A Guide To Teaching Elementary Science
A Guide To Teaching Elementary Science
A Guide To Teaching Elementary Science
Yvette Greenspan received her doctorate degree in science education and has developed
science curriculum at all levels. A career spent in teaching elementary students in an urban
community, she now instructs college students, sharing her love for the teaching and
learning of science. She considers it essential to encourage todays students to be active
learners and to concentrate on STEM topics that will help prepare them for the real world.
Yvette F. Greenspan
ISBN 978-94-6300-365-0
SensePublishers DIVS
Spine
9.322 mm
A Guide to Teaching Elementary Science
A Guide to Teaching Elementary Science
Ten Easy Steps
Yvette F. Greenspan
A C.I.P. record for this book is available from the Library of Congress.
Prefacexi
Acknowledgementsxiii
Introductionxvii
vii
Table of Contents
viii
Table of Contents
Chapter 11. P
hysical Sciences:
PS2 Matter and Stability: Forces and Interactions 63
Primary Lesson Plan: Moving Cars 63
Intermediate Lesson Plan: Small Marble/Large Marble 66
ix
Table of Contents
Appendices
Index145
x
PREFACE
This book presents ten easy steps to help veteran, experienced, and novice teachers
develop a sound, realistic, fun and exciting science curriculum within the guidelines
of the Next Generation Science Standards and the Common Core Standards. It is:
designed as a practical handbook for busy classroom teachers;
organized to include best practices for teaching science;
structured with easily implemented ideas and lesson plans that embrace and
address the needs of all learners;
prepared with extensive lists of resources.
The steps are designed with inquiry learning, thus engaging all students in the
learning process through hands-on activities in cooperative learning groups. I
wrote this book using everyday language and with simple descriptive examples that
are thought-provoking and supported by leading researchers and verified by my
extensive experience.
Using this book will not consume large amounts of your time. As an elementary
school teacher, I understand that your time is valuable and limited. Thats why I
designed this book to use before, during, or after you teach a science lesson or to
peruse when its convenient for you to reflect on the notion of how to teach science
when your students are excited and motivated to learn.
Part I
Rooted in the Next Generation Science Standards, the ten steps, basic and
uncomplicated, are easily read and should prepare you to teach science through
inquiry-based learning, the 5E Instructional Model, and the Scientific Method.
Think about them in planning your science lessons and setting up effective science
curricula. Take the ideas outlined and adapt them to the needs of your students and
to your own needs as a teacher. Try them they may not work effectively at first, but
with time, you might find them helpful and worthwhile.
xi
PREFACE
Part II
Part II of this book is devoted to sample lesson plans, which cover each of the
areas of science required by the current standards. You will see lesson plans for
both primary and intermediate grades in physical science, life science, earth and
space, and engineering, technology and applications of science. Not only do they
follow the 5E Instructional Model, a possible approach for teaching inquiry learning,
emphasizing STEM, each lesson plan contains background information on the
scientific concept, materials needed to teach each topic, the five phases for teaching
the concept, possible home learning assignments, strategies to teach the Exceptional
Student (ESE learners), some connections to other disciplines, and several real world
applications. I have also included some of my favorite lesson plans. They, too, may
be adapted, revised, and adjusted to meet the needs of your students. The unit on a
place-based experience, a field trip, gives you science content in the disciplinary
core ideas found in the Next Generation Science Standards and also integrates
mathematics, social studies, and language arts skills. The handouts are excellent
teaching tools and can be adapted, too, for all grade levels.
The figures found throughout this guidebook and other handouts exhibited in the
appendices should help you to incorporate the ten steps, always remembering that
nothing is written in stone; the steps serve only as a source of information and a
foundation to build on as you pursue new avenues of teaching. Youll find handouts
for a science fair, including an elementary assessment, and other assessments I
have used in my classroom and found to be most effective. Keep in mind that every
handout can be adapted for your grade level and the ability of your students.
A Final Note
Take into consideration the ten steps outlined in this handbook. Add them as
another source of information to help your students learn science. I believe they
can only improve your teaching and your students learning. As you embark on this
new journey, or perhaps continue it, think of it as an exciting path toward greater
understanding of all that is science.
xii
Acknowledgements
Thank you to all the college professors, educators, administrators, mentors, and
teachers who have inspired me to develop a passion for both learning and teaching
science. I have learned from all of you.
Thanks also to my editor, Virginia McCullough, for her patience, expertise, and
belief in my ability to complete this project. She has taken my words and made them
vividly real so that they can benefit the educational community.
Thank you to Peter de Liefde and the staff at Sense Publishers for having
confidence in me and for providing support and assistance in the editing, proofreading
and design of this book.
Thank you to my family and friends who have encouraged me throughout this
journey. You know who you are!
And, of course, I want to thank my husband and my children for their love,
understanding, and constant reassurance during the many hours it took me to write
this book and complete a lifelong goal.
Finally, to my grandchildren, who are learning that the world of science is all
encompassing and plays an integral role in their everyday life: May you always be
motivated and encouraged to observe, explore, learn, study, and research the true
meaning of science.
xiii
List of Figures and Tables
Figures
xv
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
Tables
Table 1. Science fair project display standard-sized science fair board 123
Table 2. Classroom observation rubric 125
Table 3. The 5Es teacher observation rubric 127
Table 4. Sample generic observation template 128
Table 5. Checklist. Sample generic science content template 128
Table 6. Portfolio assessment 130
Table 7. Pine Rockland fire adaptations data handout 137
Table 8. Pine Rockland habitat data handout 137
Table 9. Pine Rockland and Hammock shrub height data handout 137
Table 10. P ine Rockland and Hammock sunlight and vegetation
data handout 138
Table 11. Evaluation data handout 138
xvi
INTRODUCTION
In a world filled with the products of scientific inquiry, scientific literacy has
become a necessity for everyone. Everyone needs to use scientific information
to make choices that arise every day. Everyone needs to be able to engage
intelligently in public discourse and debate about important issues that involve
science and technology. And everyone deserves to share in the excitement and
personal fulfillment that can come from understanding and learning about the
natural world.1
Teaching science should be fun and rewarding. Based on the premise that children
have a natural curiosity about the things around them, teaching science would seem
to be an easy task. Children wonder how plants grow and how animals live and
move in their environment. They ask about how birds can fly and how high the sky
stretches above them. They want to know why the moon glows and why it rains. So,
given the nearly universal curiosity we see in children, why do some teachers have
difficulty creating a classroom in which all students are engaged and enthusiastic
about science learning? Based on my experience, many pre-service teachers and
novice teachers, along with some veteran teachers, too, lack the know-how to create
an active learning environment that promotes students innate inquisitiveness,
especially in culturally diverse classrooms.
In an effort to fill a gap in teaching tools, I created this practical, step-by-step
handbook to provide guidelines to help you reach your goal of a successful science
classroom for all learners. Regardless of experience level, pre-service or veteran,
every reader will come away with a foundation of strategies that provide ideas to
think about now and in the future.
Although Ive designed the steps sequentially, you can adapt them to fit your
teaching style, perhaps combining several steps or use them individually. Ive also
used the language, the jargon, of our profession. In addition, my purpose here
is not to provide an abundance of details about every science classroom strategy.
Rather, I chose to offer a brief course of action to heighten the awareness of science
for both teachers and students. After all, the ideal is to involve the students in their
own learning while recognizing their prior experiences and encouraging them to be
active learners.2
xvii
INTRODUCTION
xviii
INTRODUCTION
that timeframe.5 For eighth graders, the trend appears more positive but our U.S.
students scores still lag behind the front running Asian countries.6
What do these results say about our science teaching at these grade levels? We have
to ask ourselves if as teachers were preparing our students to meet the demands of
competing in the twenty-first century technological world. Are we addressing all of
the needs of our minority students, who currently comprise 36% of our population,
but make up more than half of all children born in the U.S. today?7
xix
INTRODUCTION
their knowledge and practices in teaching science while promoting English language
development of ELL students in urban schools.14
Moreover, according to Parsons, African American students, the second largest
minority group in the United States, perform poorly in science achievement in the
early grades, a trend that becomes more pronounced as they reach high school. Based
on her findings, she found that culturally congruent instruction and the context in
which African Americans learned science affected their success in that subject. In
her article, she analyzes the cross-cultural work of Au and Kawakami, who connect
culture, context, and learning by incorporating the ethnic minorities culture into
the education process. She contends that teaching content to these students should
contain relevant cultural examples along with meaningful strategies.15
Others agree that we see a declining number of African American students in
mathematics and science, particularly in STEM related fields. The reasons for this
decline include perception of those subjects, lack of mentoring, stereotyping, and
economic shortfalls.16 On a more positive note, however, in recent years dropout rates
have fallen steeply for all minority groups, including African American, Hispanic,
and low-income young people; college attendance among the same groups has
jumped sharply. Still, in 2014, students from low-income families complete college
at only one-seventh the rate of those from high-income families.17
Not only are African American students and Hispanics not achieving the kind
of success needed to understand basic science concepts, but girls also fall into this
category. Patrick, Mantzicopoulos, and Samarapungavan noted that according to
the United States Department of Education, girls are underrepresented in degrees
earned and careers related to physical science, computer and information science,
and engineering. Because girls are less likely to study science-oriented subjects and
dont select non-compulsory science classes in high school, they have minimized
their opportunity to access high-paying careers.18 Furthermore, St. Rose states, it
is true that women are underrepresented in high-paying jobs, like those in science,
technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields. But its not that simple
as women not choosing STEM theyre often actively discouraged from pursuing
careers in those fields.19
What, then, discourages girls? What influences girls motivation (or the lack
of it) to learn science? In a research study conducted in a large urban community,
elementary school girls in third and fifth grade were observed learning science in a
classroom setting with boys and other girls. Observers noted that cultural and societal
factors had an appreciable effect on how girls appeared to have learned science. The
qualitative study included observations, interviews, and a questionnaire; the results
mirrored previous studies, which indicated that girls are generally conscious about
their interrelationships with boys; this then affects their self-perception and the way
others perceive them. As a consequence, girls modify their behavior and alter the
way they learn science.20 This is certainly a possible influence that discourages girls
to choose science related careers.
xx
INTRODUCTION
Given the performance among all students in the U.S. and the gap among certain
groups of students, I call upon you to act now and cultivate a love for all things
science. Its within your power to help your students improve their knowledge of
science, enrich the process of understanding science, develop their ability to think
critically, and facilitate their proficiency in connecting and applying science concepts
to everyday life . As professionals, its our responsibility to enhance science learning
for every student, whatever their race, culture, or gender. We are called on to foster
students natural curiosity so that they can reach their full potential and acquire the
necessary science skills to live productively in the twenty-first century. Without a
doubt, children from all backgrounds are capable of being successful in science.21
This ten-step handbook is designed as a tool to help you expand your views on
science education and develop curricula that include the process of inquiry-based
science. These ten steps will help you create a learning environment that emphasizes
hands-on discovery and exploration of scientific concepts. Consider this a guide,
which when implemented should help you create a classroom setting that is fun and
engaging for all your students . Follow these ten easy steps Ive outlined and you and
your students can grow together toward understanding your scientific world.
NOTES
1
National Committee on Science Education Standards and National Research Council. (1996). National
science education standards (p. 1). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_
id=4962&page=1
2
Gilmer, P. J. (1999). Looking at science as a pattern: Learning from differing perspectives (p. 4).
Presented at the annual meeting, National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Boston, MA.
3
Keeley, P. (2009, May). Elementary science education in the K-12 System. NSTA Reports, 20, 3.
4
Prez-Pea, R. (2014, December 26). Colleges reinvent classes to keep more students in science.
The New York Times (p. 2). Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/27/us/college-science-
classes-failure-rates-soar-go-back-to-drawing-board.html
5
Gonzales, P., Williams T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008, December 9).
Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-
grade students in an international context. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics,
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/
timss/results11.asp
6
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Trends in international mathematics and science
study (TIMSS). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/results11_science11.asp
7
Act for Youth: Center for Excellence. (2015). U.S. teen demographics. Retrieved from
http://www.actforyouth.net/adolescence/demographics
8
Bohrnstedt, G. (2013, October 30). Gains and gaps: Education performance after a nation at risk.
Retrieved from http://www.air.org/resource/three-decades-education-reform-are-we-still-nation-risk
9
Fensterwald, J. (2012). STEMing the minority gap. Retrieved from http://toped.svefoundation.org/
2012/04/03/steming-the-minority-gap/
10
Truby, R. (1998). Student work and teacher practices in science (NCES#1999-455). Washington, DC:
National Center for Education Statistics.
11
Bryan, L., & Atwater, M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher
preparation programs. Science Education, 86, 826.
xxi
INTRODUCTION
12
Kennedy, M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education (Research Monograph
No. 13). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.
13
Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R. D., LeRoy, K., & Secada, W. G. (2008, January). Science
achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year
professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 32.
14
Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R. D., LeRoy, K., & Secada, W. G. (2008, January). Science
achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year
professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 32.
15
Parsons, E. C. (2008, August). Learning contexts, Black cultural ethos, and the science achievement
of African American students in an urban middle school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45,
665683.
16
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Fast facts: Degrees conferred by race and sex.
Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/FastFacts/display.asp?id=72
17
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Progress for American children. Retrieved from
http://www.ed.gov/priorities
18
Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Samarapungavan, A. (2009, February). Motivation for learning
science in kindergarten: Is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction
make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 166191.
19
St. Rose, A. (2013, Winter). Community college: Training ground for women in STEM? Outlook, 107,
2021.
20
Greenspan, Y. F. (2000). Gender differences in an elementary school learning environment : A study on
how girls learn science in collaborative learning groups. Ann Arbor, MI: Bell & Howell Information
and Learning Company.
21
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and
teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
xxii
part I
Ten Easy Steps
CHAPTER 1
STEP ONE
Know What You Want to Accomplish
The important thing in science is not so much to obtain new facts as to discover
new ways of thinking about them.
William Lawrence Bragg
Science is complex to teach, in no small part because its always changing. Your first
priority is understanding the content youre about to teach. (If you are not familiar
with the science concept at hand, use the resources mentioned below.) However, its
fine to learn along with your students, and theyll admire you for living the reality
that scientific knowledge is expanding rapidly. After all, the ideal classroom is one
in which the students and teacher grow and evolve into a community of learners.1
Ask yourself what you want to learn about the concept, what content is required,
and your students current level of understanding of the topic. As you develop your
students curiosity, try to widen yours. If possible, read books and magazines on the
topic, research current practices, use students textbooks or your Teachers Guide
as a reference, discuss the topic with colleagues, browse the Internet, and attend
professional development workshops. All of these will help you prepare for what
you want to accomplish.
Organizing and planning your lessons are the most important and time-consuming
tasks involved in teaching, whether the subject is language arts, mathematics, social
studies, or science. However, gathering the tools and planning lessons to meet your
objectives are necessary steps to ensure success. (Check out suggestions for inquiry
learning and the lesson plan format for the 5-E Instructional Model detailed in Step
Five).
The groundwork for all science lesson planning is derived from the National Science
Education Standards, published in 1996. Standards are not a curriculum. They are
not a set of lesson plans. They are goals for achievement that are appropriate for all
members of the science education community.2 Most recently, the Next Generation
Science Standards were released; their goal is to better prepare students to think
3
CHAPTER 1
critically, engage them in more relevant context, and apply science to their daily
lives.3 The Standards are divided into three main areas:
1. Performance expectations: Performances that can be assessed to determine if
students meet the standards on what they should know and understand.
2. Disciplinary Core Ideas: Each performance expectation incorporates disciplinary
core ideas (physical science, life science, earth and space, engineering, technology
and applications of science), cross-cutting concepts (patterns, cause and effect,
systems, energy, structure, and stability), and a science and engineering practice.
3. Connections to other ideas and Common Core: Each set of performance
expectations lists connections to other ideas within science and engineering, and
with the Common Core State Standards (see below) in mathematics and language
arts.4,5
By following the guidelines set forth in these Standards, teachers know what they
need to accomplish in their science classrooms.
In addition, statewide standards, those known as Common Core Standards,6 were
developed by a team of educators that included teachers, administrators, and national
organizations. Their mission was to upgrade state standards by adopting a common
core of internationally benchmarked standards in mathematics and language arts
for grades K-12. The objective of the Common Core Standards is to ensure that
students of that state become equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills in
mathematics and language arts to be competitive globally. Although the Common
Core Standards are not yet written for science, expectations are that science content
would be integrated into the teaching of both mathematics and language arts.
Next, consider how youll plan your lessons. Develop a unit of study, a series
of easy-flowing and sequentially-targeted lessons, which correlate with the Next
Generation Science Standards and the Common Core Standards mentioned above.
Both the National Research Council7 and the Institute for Inquiry8 recommend
that the goals or outcomes for most science lessons should focus on teaching both
science content and the science process skills (now referred to as Practices in the
Next Generation Science Standards): observing, measuring, inferring, classifying,
predicting, and communicating (see Step Seven). Plan ahead, always remembering
that your planning depends on the cognitive and maturation levels of your students.
Consider a format for lesson development, incorporating inquiry-based learning,
which includes the five phases9 of engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration,
evaluation (discussed in Step Five).
By the same token, try to organize your investigations/experiments during your
planning periods, a time when students arent present. Further, prepare well in
advance with all materials you need to conduct the investigation. Good preparation
decreases stress and promotes a safe learning environment that ensures maximum
learning. At the time you present the lesson itself, your materials should be ready to
distribute to your students. Your preparation then gives you ample time to interact
with your students and guide them through the learning process.
4
STEP ONE
Finally, try to be flexible. Think about all the issues that could affect your curriculum,
from planning your lessons, gathering your manipulatives, and/or organizing your
experiments. You may need to be flexible in any number of areas to accommodate
your students needs. Students classroom behavior and their readiness to learn,
potential parent requests, and possible administration directives might call on you to
modify your lesson plan as you teach. When time is short, you may need to change
your plan and complete the topic at another time or make changes to teach it in the
next hour or the next day.
In addition, be flexible if the manipulatives you need to conduct an experiment
arent immediately available they could be hidden in closets, cabinets, or boxes in
other classrooms in the school (see Step Six). If you need to, tap into the resources at
your school; ask administrators, other teachers, or even your students if they know
where the materials are located.
If the tools you need for conducting a particular lesson are unavailable, solicit
donations from local businesses or check the catalogues of various scientific
companies, such as:
Carolina Biological Supply www.carolina.com
ETA Hand2Mind www.hand2mind.com
Frey Scientific www.freyscientific.com
Explore Learning www.explorelearning.com
Pasco Scientific www.pasco.com
Of course, request monetary help from your administrator before purchasing the
manipulatives, or ask your students parents to donate the materials (see Step Six).
Youll experience much less frustration if you take steps to acquire the materials
your students need for their experiments.
KEY POINTS
notes
1
Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin
(Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 321). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
5
CHAPTER 1
2
Kendall Hunt Publishing Company. (2014). National science education standards (p. 1). Retrieved
from http://www.mykhscience.com/standards.html
3
National Science Teachers Association. (2009). National science education standards. Retrieved from
http://www.nsta.org/publications/nses.aspx
4
Next Generation Science Standards. (2013, May). Appendix M: Connections to the common core state
standards for literacy in science and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/
sites/ngss/files/Appendix%20M%20Connections%20to%20the%20CCSS%20for%20Literacy_
061213.pdf
5
Committee on Development of an Addendum to the National Science Education Standards on
Scientific Inquiry, Center for Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education & National research
Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and
learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6
Common Core Standards. (2015). Preparing Americas students for success. Retrieved from
http://www.corestandards.org/
7
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Retrieved from
http://serc.carleton.edu/resources/1572.html
8
Exploratorium Institute for Inquiry. (2006). Assessing for learning: Workshops designed to
introduce teachers to formative assessment (Workshops IIV). San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from
www.exploratorium.edu/ifi/workshops/assessing
9
BSCS 5E Instructional Model. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.bscs.org/bscs-5e-instructional-
model
6
CHAPTER 2
STEP TWO
Set the Stage
Using the Constructivist Learning Theory as a guide, we can assume that individuals
build knowledge based on previous experiences, constructed by making sense of
these personal experiences in a social context.24 In other words, learners construct
their own knowledge and develop meaning based on that knowledge. Thats why a
pre-knowledge phase gives the teacher an awareness of what the student knows at
the onset. Lets think about the impact of a heavier moving truck colliding with a
small car. Most know, based on their experiences, that the truck will do much more
damage to the car just because it is bigger and, therefore, in their thinking, can exert
a larger force. However, Newtons Law states that two interacting bodies exert equal
and opposite forces on each other. Therefore, students should be given opportunities
7
CHAPTER 2
to explore such misconceptions together to change their initial construct and cultivate
a new one.
In the final analysis, this pre-teaching phase allows the teacher to understand
what drives a student to understand a science concept. The teacher can then correct
students ideas and guide them toward a better comprehension of the goals of the
lesson and, at the same time, students can take on the responsibility to move forward
and learn the concept.
TEACHER EFFICACY
Figure 1. Dimensions of teacher efficacy. The eight dimensions suggest that teacher
effectiveness is rooted in a positive attitude toward their own abilities and their
responsibilities and goals, paired with student cooperation6
Based on Ashtons beliefs about teacher effectiveness and expectations, the notion
evolves that students take responsibility for their own learning while teachers
provide the necessary manipulatives and tools with which to discover and learn. In
8
STEP TWO
other words, the teacher, as a guide, establishes a community of learners that expects
students to engage with each other and ultimately succeed in learning science.
QUESTIONING TECHNIQUES
9
CHAPTER 2
Equally important to asking the right kind of question is the manner in which a
teacher responds to a students answer. For example, if you respond by saying, any
questions or is that clear? or okay? youre inadvertently telling your students
that they shouldnt have any questions and deadens further discussion. Better to say,
I bet you have some questions now maybe I can answer them! This implies that
youre interested in what they have to say.
When addressing questions, first focus on the entire class rather than the
individual student so that the student is not singled out. Next, be positive, direct,
loving, constructive, encouraging, and helpful. If the question is a good one, tell the
student as much; if the response is off task or inconsequential to the topic, respond
with a different kind of statement, such as: Thats very interesting, I like what
youre saying, or Lets talk about that later. Finally, if youre unsure about a
response or simply want to involve your students in the process, throw the question
back to them.9
Many researchers have studied the importance of teachers and students discussing
scientific concepts together, either in a whole class setting or in small groups. For
example, Gallas10 describes the way implementing talking science can transform
the way we teach science and over time, changes the teachers role. She views
classroom science as a place for discourse, with its own language and thinking
practices and describes the outcome for students in this child-centered approach. In
other words, when students discuss the language of science throughout the learning
process, it enhances their understandings of scientific concepts and provokes further
thought.
Along these same lines, you can set the stage by enhancing your students natural
curiosity; they already have an innate desire to learn about the world first-hand, which
is why its important to provide ample and meaningful opportunities to develop a
love of learning science. Their eagerness to explore and discover is inherent, but
as they observe and experience the world, they may develop misconceptions. For
example, based on observation alone, they may conclude the sun rises in the morning
at the same place, or the same stars appear in the sky every night, seasons are caused
by the distance between the earth and the sun, the moon can only been seen at night,
mass and weight are the same, and rocks must be heavy.11
Teachers should provide many hands-on activities so students can work through
their misconceptions, change their beliefs, and reconceptualize their views. As they
face these challenges and learn to solve problems effortlessly, students can apply the
process to real-world situations.
10
STEP TWO
KEY POINTS
notes
1
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind,
experience, and school (p. 167). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary
science: Research into childrens ideas. London, England: Routledge.
3
Geelan, D. R. (1997). Epistemological anarchy and the many forms of constructivism. Science &
Education, 6, 1528.
4
Tobin, K. (1993). Preface: Constructivism: A paradigm for the practice of science education. In K.
Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. ixxvi). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
5
Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal
of Teacher Education, 35(5), 2832.
6
Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal
of Teacher Education, 35(5), 29.
7
Manktelow, J., & Carlson, A. (2015). Questioning techniques: Video transcript. Retrieved from
https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMC_88.htm
8
Exploratorium Institute for Inquiry. (2006). Assessing for learning: Workshops designed to
introduce teachers to formative assessment (Workshops IIV). San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from
www.exploratorium.edu/ifi/workshops/assessing/
9
Berkeley University of California Center for Teaching and Learning. (2015). Student engagement:
Asking and answering questions. Retrieved from http://teaching.berkeley.edu/asking-and-answering-
questions
10
Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing childrens questions and theories,
responding with curricula. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11
National Science Teachers Association. (2014). Common elementary student science misconceptions.
Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/elementaryschool/connections/201209AppropriateTopics-
ElementaryStudentScienceMisconceptions.pdf
11