CH 3
CH 3
CH 3
E3-2
E3-3
Given:
Javadi Company makes a single product that is subject to wide seasonal variations
in demand. Javadi uses a job-order costing system and computes predetermined
overhead rates on a quarterly basis using the number of units to be produced as the
allocation base. Its estimated costs, by quarter, for the coming year are given below:
Quarter
First Second Third Fourth
Direct Materials $240,000 $120,000 $60,000 $180,000
Direct Labor 96,000 48,000 24,000 72,000
Manufacturing Overhead 228,000 204,000 192,000 ?
Total Manufacturing Costs $564,000 $372,000 $276,000 ?
Management finds the variation in quarterly unit product costs to be confusing and
difficult to work with. It has been suggested that the problem lies with manufacturing
overhead, since it is the largest element of total manufacturing cost. Accordingly,
you have been asked to find a more appropriate way of assigning manufacturing
overhead cost to units of product.
Required:
1. Using the high-low method, estimate the fixed manufacturing overhead cost per
quarter and the variable manufacturing overhead cost per unit. Creat a cost
formula to estimate the total manufacturing overhead cost for the fourth quarter.
Compute the total manufacturing cost and unit product cost for the fourth quarter.
Manufacturing
Dollars Units
High Values $228,000 80,000 $228,000
Low Values 192,000 20,000 Minus variable MO 48,000
Change in Costs $36,000 60,000 Fixed MOH $180,000
Variable MOH cost per unit $0.60
Fixed MOH cost per quarter $180,000 $180,000
2. What is causing the estimated unit product cost to fluctuate from one quarter
to the next?
The fixed portion of the MOH cost is causing the unit product costs to fluctuate.
The unit product cost increases as the level of production decreases because
fixed overhead is being spread over fewer units.
3. How would you recommend stabilizing the company's unit product cost?
Support your answer with computations that adapt the cost formula you
created in requirement 1.
Fixed cost for the year can be estimated as 4 times the quarterly
value of $180,000 or $720,000.
Manufacturing overhead
b 12,000
c 3,000
d 197,000
E3-5
Debit Credit
a Raw materials inventory Cash
Raw materials inventory 75,000 a 75,000 73,000 b
Cash 75,000 75,000 a
126,000 d
b Work in process inventory 67,000
Manufacturing overhead 6,000
Raw materials inventory 73,000
Given:
Parmitan Corporation hyas provided the following data concerning last month's manufacturing
operations.
Beginning Ending
Raw materials inventory $24,000 $6,000
Work in process inventory 41,000 38,000
Finished goods inventory 86,000 93,000
Required:
Parmitan Corporation
Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured
For the month just completed year
Parmitan Corporation
Cost of Goods Sold
For the month just completed year
Given:
Southworth Company uses a job-order costing system and applies manufacturing
cost to jobs on the basis of the cost of direct materials used in production. At the
beginning of the current year, the following estimates were made for the purpose
of computing the predetermined overhead rate:
Estimated Actual
Manufacturing overhead cost $248,000 $243,000
Direct materials cost $155,000 $150,000
MOH rate $1.60 160% $1.62
The following transactions took place during the year (all purchases and services
were acquired on account):
a. Raw materials purchased $142,000
b. Raw materials requisitioned for use in production (all DM) $150,000
c. Utility bills incurred in the factory $21,000 $21,000
Required:
Debit Credit
1. Prepare journal entries to record the above data.
Southworth Company
Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured
For the Period ended on ___________
Southworth Company
Schedule of Cost of Goods Sold
For the Period ended on ___________
Southworth Company
Statement of Income
For the Period ended on ___________
Sales $1,000,000
Less: Adjusted Cost of Goods Sold 603,000
Gross Margin $397,000
Selling and Administrative Expenses:
Salaries Expense $145,000
Advertising Expense 130,000
Depreciation Expense 5,000
Rent Expense 18,000
Miscellaneous Expense 17,000 315,000
Net Operating Income $82,000
6. Job 218 was one of the many jobs started and completed during the
year. The job required $3,600 in DMs and 400 hours of DL time at a
rate of $11 per hour. If the job contained 500 units and the company
billed at 75% above the unit product cost on the job cost sheet, what
price per unit would have been charged to the customer?
Given:
The following information is taken from the accounts of FasGrow Company. The entries in the
T-accounts are summaries of the transaction that affected those accounts during the year.
Bal. 100,000
The overhead that had been applied to production during the year is distributed among the
ending balances in the accounts as follow:
For example, of the $80,000 ending balance in WIP, $32,800 was overhead that had been
applied during the year.
Required:
(a) To record the actual MOH incurred during the current time period.
(b) To record applied MOH assigned to production during the current time period.
(c) To record cost of goods manufactured for the current time period.
(d) To record the cost of goods sold for the current time period.
2. Assume that the company closes any balance in the MOH directly to COGS.
Prepare the necessary journal entry.
Debit Credit
Manufacturing Overhead 30,000
Cost of Goods Sold 30,000
To close the Manufacturing Overhead Account
3. Assume instead that the company allocates any balance in the MOH account to the
other accounts in proportion to the overhead applied during the year that is in the
ending balance in each account. Prepare the necessary journal entry, with
supporting computations.
Debit Credit
Manufacturing Overhead 30,000
Work in Process Inventory 2,400
Finished Goods Inventory 3,000
Cost of Goods Sold 24,600
To close the Manufacturing Overhead Account
Case 3-29: Plantwide versus Departmental MOH Rates; Under/Overapplied Overhead
Given:
"Don't tell me we've lost another bid!" exclaimed Sandy Kovallas, president of Lenko Products,
Inc. "I'm afraid so," replied Doug Martin, the operations vice president. "One of our competitors
underbid us by about $10,000 on the Hastings job." "I just can't figure it out," said Kovallas. "It
seems we're either too high to get the job or too low to make any money on half the jobs we bid
any more. What's happened?"
Lenko Products manufactures specialized goods to customers' specifications and operates a job-
order costing system. Manufacturing overhead cost is applied to jobs on the basis of direct labor
cost. The following estimates were made at the beginning of the year:
Department
Cutting Machining Assembly Total Plant
Direct labor $300,000 $200,000 $400,000 $900,000
Manufacturing overhead $540,000 $800,000 $100,000 $1,440,000
Jobs require varying amounts of work in the three departments. The Hastings job, for
example, would have required manufacturing costs in the three departments as follows:
Department
Cutting Machining Assembly Total Plant
Direct materials $12,000 $900 $5,600 $18,500
Direct labor $6,500 $1,700 $13,000 $21,200
Manufacturing overhead ? ? ? $0
The company uses a plantwide overhead rate to apply manufacturing overhead costs
to jobs.
Required:
1. Assuming the use of a plantwide rate:
a. Calculate the MOH rate for the current year
Predetermined MOH Rate = Estimated TMOH $/ Estimated total amount of the allocation base
b. Determine the amount of MOH $ that would have been applied to the Hastings job.
Applied MOH = MOH Rate X Actual use of the allocation based used to the determine rate
2. Suppose that instead of using a plantwide overhead rate, the company had used a
separate predetermined overhead rate in each department. Under these conditions:
a. Compute the MOH rate for each department for the current year.
Predetermined MOH Rate = Estimated TMOH $/ Estimated total amount of the allocation base
Department
Cutting Machining Assembly Total Plant
Manufacturing overhead $540,000 $800,000 $100,000 $1,440,000
Direct labor cost $300,000 $200,000 $400,000 $900,000
MOH Rate per DL $ $1.80 $4.00 $0.25 $1.60
MOH Rate as a % of DL $ 180% 400% 25% 160%
b. Determine the amount of MOH cost that would have been applied to the Hastings job.
Department
Cutting Machining Assembly Total Plant
Direct materials $12,000 $900 $5,600 $18,500
Direct labor $6,500 $1,700 $13,000 $21,200
Manufacturing overhead $11,700 $6,800 $3,250 $21,750
3. Explain the difference between the MOH that would have been applied to the Hastings
job using the plantwide rate in question 1 (b) above and using the departmental rates
in question 2 (b).
The bulk of the labor cost on the Hastings job is in the Assembly Department, which incurs
very little overhead cost. The department has an overhead rate of only 25% of direct labor
cost as compared to much higher rates in the other two departments.
As indicated above, use of departmental MOH overhead rates results in a much smaller
amount of overhead cost charged to the Hastings job than if a plantwide rate is used.
The use of a plantwide overhead rate redistributes MOH costs proportionally between the
three departments (at the rate of 160% of DL costs) and results in a larger amount of MOH
cost being charged to the Hastings job, as shown in Part 1. Use of the plantwide MOH rate
may help explain why the company bid too high and lost the job.
If a plantwide MOH rate is being used, the company will tend to charge too little MOH cost
to jobs that require a large amount of labor in the Cutting or Machining Departments. The
reason is that the plantwide overhead rate (160%) is much lower than the rates if these
departments were considered separately (180% and 400%).
4. Assume that it is customary in the industry to bid jobs at 150% of total manufacturing
cost (direct materials, direct labor, and applied MOH). What was the company's bid
price on the Hastings job? What would the bid price have been if departmental MOH
rates had been used to apply MOH costs?
5. At the end of the year, the company assembled the following actual cost data relating
to all jobs worked on during the year:
Department
Cutting Machining Assembly Total Plant
Actual MOH Incurred $560,000 $830,000 $92,000 $1,482,000
Applied MOH 512,000 336,000 544,000 1,392,000
Underapplied Overhead $48,000 $494,000 ($452,000) $90,000
Department
Cutting Machining Assembly Total Plant
Actual MOH Incurred $560,000 $830,000 $92,000 $1,482,000
Applied MOH 576,000 840,000 85,000 1,501,000
Overapplied Overhead ($16,000) ($10,000) $7,000 ($19,000)
Problem 3A-3: Predetermined Overhead Rate and Capacity
Given:
Skid Road Recording, Inc., is a small audio recording studio located in Seattle. The company handles
work for advertising agencies -- primarily for radio ads -- and has a few singers and bands as clients.
Skid Road Recording handles all aspects of recording from editing to making a digital master from
which CDs can be copied. The competition in the audio recording industry in Seattle has always been
tough, but it has been getting even tougher over the last several years. The studio has been losing
customers to newer studios that are equipped with more-up-to-date equipment and that are able to
offer very attractive prices and excellent service. Summary data concerning the last two years of
operations follows:
2010 2011
Estimated hours of studio services 1,000 750
Estimated studio overhead cost $90,000 $90,000
Actual hours of studio service provided 900 600
Actual studio overhead cost incurred $90,000 $90,000
Hours of studio service at capacity 1,800 1,800
The company applies studio overhead to recording jobs on the basis of the hours of studio service
provided. For example, 30 hours of studio time were required to record, edit, and master the Slug
Fest music CD for a local band. All the studio overhead is fixed, and the actual overhead cost
incurred was exactly as estimated at the beginning of the year in both 2010 and 2011.
Required:
1. Skid Road Recording computes its predetermined overhead rate at the beginning of each year
based on the estimated studio overhead and the estimated hours of studio service for the year.
How much overhead would have applied to the Slug Fest job if it had been done in 2010? In
2011? By how much would overhead have been underapplied or overapplied in 2010? In 2011?
Predetermined overhead rate = Estimated studio overhead cost/Estimated hours of studio services
2010 2011
Predetermined rate
Estimated studio overhead cost $90,000 $90,000
Estimated hours of studio services 1,000 750
Predetermined overhead rate $90 $120
Studio time used on Slug Fest job 30 30
Applied overhead to Slug Fest job $2,700 $3,600
2010 2011
Calculation of Under/Overapplied Overhead
Actual hours of studio service provided 900 600
Predetermined overhead rate $90 $120
Applied overhead $81,000 $72,000
Actual studio overhead cost incurred $90,000 $90,000
Underapplied overhead ($9,000) ($18,000)
2. The president of Skid Road Recording has heard that some companies in the industry have
changed to a system of computing the predetermined overhead rate at the beginning of each
year based on the estimated studio overhead for the year and the hours of studio service that
could be provided at capacity. He would like to know what effect this method would have on
job costs. How much overhead would have been applied using this method to the Slug Fest
job if it had been done in 2010? In 2011? By how much will overhead have been underapplied
or overapplied in 2010 using this method? In 2011?
Predetermined overhead rate = Estimated studio overhead cost/Capacity hours of studio services
2010 2011
Predetermined rate
Estimated studio overhead cost $90,000 $90,000
Capacity hours of studio services 1,800 1,800
Predetermined overhead rate $50 $50
Studio time used on Slug Fest job 30 30
Applied overhead to Slug Fest job $1,500 $1,500
2010 2011
Calculation of Under/Overapplied Overhead
Actual hours of studio service provided 900 600
Predetermined overhead rate $50 $50
Applied overhead $45,000 $30,000
Actual studio overhead cost incurred $90,000 $90,000
Underapplied overhead ($45,000) ($60,000)
3. How would you interpret the underapplied or overapplied overhead that results from using studio
hours at capacity to compute the predetermined overhead rate?
4. What fundamental business problem is Skid Road Recording facing? Which method of
determinimg the predetermined overhead rate is likely to be more helpful in facing this problem?
Explain.
Fundamental problem: competition is drawing customers away
Use of estimated hours as the predetermined overhead base can cause a death spiral
Lower volume causes higher cost which leads to higher prices which leads to lower
volume which leads to higher costs which leads to higher prices which leads to lower
volume, etc.
Use of capacity hours as the predetermined overhead base will avoid the death spiral.
Predetermined overhead rate is stable throughout.
While basing the predetermined rate on capacity (rather than on estimated activity) will
not solve the company's basic problem (decreasing mkt. share), at least this method
will be less likely to send managers misleading signals.
Problem 3B-5: Classification of Labor Costs
Given:
Lynn Bjorland is employed by Southern Laboratories and is directly involved in preparing
the company's leading antibiotic drug. Lynn's basic wage rate is $24 per hour. The
company pays its employees time and a half for any work in excess of 40 hours per
week.
Required:
1. Suppose that in a given week Lynn works 45 hours. Compute Lynn's total wages for
the week. How much of this cost would the company allocate to direct labor cost? To
manufacturing overhead?
Hours Rate Total
Direct labor costs 45 $24 $1,080
MOH-Overtime Premium 5 $12 60
$1,140
2. Suppose in another week that Lynn works 50 hours but is idle for 4 hours during the
week due to equipment breakdowns. Compute Lynn's total wages for the week. How
much of this amount would be allocated to direct labor cost? To manufacturing
overhead?
Hours Rate Total
Direct labor costs 46 $24 $1,104
MOH idle time 4 $24 96
MOH overtime premium 10 $12 120
$1,320
3. Southern Laboratories has an attractive package of fringe benefits that costs the
company $8 for each hour of employee time (either regular time or overtime).
During a particular week Lynn works 48 hours but is idle for 3 hours due to
material shortages. Compute Lynn's total wages and fringe benefits for the week.
If the company treats all fringe benefits as part of manufacturing overhead cost,
how much of Lynn's wages and fringe benefits for the week would be allocated
to direct labor cost? To manufacturing costs?