Unit I: Introduction To Indian Constitution
Unit I: Introduction To Indian Constitution
Unit I: Introduction To Indian Constitution
Introduction to Indian
Constitution
The framing of the Constitution was completed on November 26, 1949 when
the Constituent Assembly formally adopted the new Constitution. The
Constitution came into force with effect from January 26, 1950.
The Constitution contains the fundamental law of the land. It is the source of
all powers of, and limitations on, the three organs of State, viz. the executive,
legislature and judiciary. No action of the state would be valid unless it is
permissible under the Constitution. Therefore, it is imperative to have a clear
understanding of the nature and working of the Constitution.
Prof. Wheare put-forth his view that to say a Constitution is federal in nature,
it should displays federal character predominantly.
Factors that affect the federal character of the Constitution of India are:
Principles of Federalism
The Indian Constitution is basically federal in form and is marked by the
traditional characteristics of a federal system, namely, supremacy of the
Constitution, division of power between the Union and State Governments,
existence of an independent judiciary and a rigid procedure for the
amendment of the Constitution.
CASE LAWS
1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461 1
2. S. R. Bommai v. Union of India, AIR 1994 SC 1918 8
3. State of West Bengal v. Union of India, AIR 1963 SC 1241 24
4. Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab, AIR 1955 SC 549 39
5. Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India, AIR 2006 SC 3127
6. State of Haryana v. State of Punjab, AIR 2002 SC 685
Preamble
WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to
constitute India into a [SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC] and to secure to all its citizens:
Article 4: Laws made under articles 2 and 3 to provide for the amendment of
the First and the Fourth Schedules and supplemental, incidental and
consequential matters
CASE LAWS
1. In re Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves, AIR 1960 SC 845 47
2. Ram Kishore Sen v. Union of India, AIR 1966 SC 644
3. Union of India v. Sukumar Sengupa, AIR 1990 SC 1692
4. N. Masthan Sahib v. Chief Commissioner Pondicherry, AIR 1962 SC
797
5. R. C. Poudyal v. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 1804
6. Babulal Parate v. State of Bombay, AIR 1960 SC 51
Part II Citizenship
Article 5: Citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution
Citizenship by Birth
Article 7: Rights of citizenship of certain migrants to Pakistan
Commonwealth Citizenship
Every person who is a citizen of a Commonwealth country specified in the
First Schedule shall, by virtue of that citizenship, have the status of a
Commonwealth citizen in India.
Case Laws:
1. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar, AIR 1965
SC 40 (48)
2. Bennet Coleman and Co. Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1973 SC 106:
(1972) 2 SCC 788: 1973 (1) SCJ 177
3. D.C & G.M. v. Union of India AIR 1983 SC 937
Domicile Meaning
The country that a person treats as their permanent home, or lives in and has
a substantial connection with. The state in which a person has his/her
permanent residence or intends to make his/her residence, as compared to
where the person is living temporarily.
Kinds of Domicile
1. Domicile of origin
2. Domicile of choice
3. Domicile by operating of law
One Domicile
Under the Indian Constitution, there is only one domicile viz. the domicile of
the country and there is no separate domicile for a State.
Case Law:
Pradeep Jain (Dr.) v. Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 1420 : (1984) 3 SCC
654: 1984 Ed Case 237, para 8-9
Citizenship by Migration
Migration must be with intention to reside permanently in India. Such
intention may be formed even later.
Natural Rights
Natural Rights are those rights that are available to each and every being,
including human beings. Rights that are specific to Human beings are also
called as Human Rights. Natural rights deals with right to life, right to
movement, etc.
At the same time, when a person lives alone in an island, he does not have
right but freedom. Only when a man lives as a group or in a community,
rights evolve. Because, when a man lives in a group, there is always conflict
and absolute freedom cannot be assured. Hence, the concept of right is
correlated with duties.
After this, nearly all democracies of the world have given a constitutional
sanctity to certain inalienable rights available to their citizens. (Source:
Hanumant.com)
The need for Fundamental Rights
1. Rule of Law
These rights are a protection to the citizens against the govt and are necessary
for having the rule of law and not of a a govt or a person. Since explicitly
given by the constitution to the people, these rights dare not be transgressed
by the authority. The govt. is fully answerable to the courts and is fully
required to uphold these rights.
3. Quantification of Freedom
Every Indian citizen in free to practice a religion of his choice, but that is not
so in the gulf countries. Our right to speech and expression allows us to freely
criticize the govt. but this is not so in China. (Source: Hanumant.com)
Art. 19(1)a 19(1)g and Art. 19(2) places reasonable restriction on rights.
Our rights are not absolute rights.
Definition of State
Article 12 of the Constitution defines the State as follows:
In this part, unless the context otherwise requires, the State includes the
Government and Parliament of India and the Government and the Legislature
of each of the States and all local or other authorities within the territory of
India or under the control of the Government of India.
The definition of the term the State specifies the authorities and
instrumentalities functioning within or without the territory of India, which
shall be deemed to be the State for the purpose of part III of the
Constitution. The definition is inclusive and not exhaustive. Therefore,
authorities and instrumentalities not specified in it may also fall within it if
they otherwise satisfy the characteristics of the State as defined in this
article.
Local Authorities
A local authority having a legal grievance may be able to take out a writ.
Thus, a writ was issued on the petition of a local authority against a public
utility concern, for the latters failure to fulfil its statutory obligation to
supply power to the local authority, a consumer;
Case Law:
Corporation of City of Nagpur v. N.E.L & Power Co., AIR 1958 Bom 498
Other Authorities
Mr. Justice Bhagwati has given following test for determining whether an
entity is an instrumentality or agency of the State
Doctrine of Severability
Article 13 of the Indian Constitution provides for Doctrine of Severability
which states that All laws in force in India before the commencement of
Constitution shall be void in so far they are inconsistent with the provisions
of the Constitution.
A law becomes invalid only to the extent to which it is inconsistent with the
fundamental rights. So only that part of the law will be declared invalid
which is inconsistent, and the rest of the law will stand. However, on this
point a clarification has been made by the courts that invalid part of the law
shall be severed and declared invalid if really it is severable, i.e if after
separating the invalid part the valid part is capable of giving effect to the
legislatures
intent, then only it will survive, otherwise the court shall declare the entire
law as invalid.
Case Laws:
Doctrine of Eclipse
It states that an existing law which is inconsistent with a fundamental right
become inoperative from the date of the commencement of the constitution, it
cannot be accepted as dead altogether. The Doctrine of Eclipse is based on
the principle that a law which violates fundamental rights, is not nullity or
void ab initio but becomes, only unenforceable i.e. remains in a moribund
condition. It is over-shadowed by the fundamental rights and remains
dormant, but it is not dead. .
Case Laws:
It is the core article under Right to Equality. It deals with two kinds of rights.
It states that the State shall not deny to any person
CASE LAWS
Air India Etc. Etc vs Nergesh Meerza & Ors. Etc. Etc on 28 August, 1981
A.H. under A.I. was retired from service in the following contingencies:
Case Laws:
Case Laws:
Sexual Harassment
Vishaka v State of Rajasthan
Women Reservation
Rajesh Kumar Gupta v State of U.P.
No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.
No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of
profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any
title from any foreign State.
No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without
the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any
kind from or under any foreign State
Bharat Ratna, Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan and
Padma Shri Awards:
Fundamental Rights
The Constitution of India contains the right to freedom, given in articles 19,
20, 21 and 22, with the view of guaranteeing individual rights that were
considered vital by the framers of the constitution. The right to freedom in
Article 19 guarantees the following six freedoms:
Freedom to assemble peacefully without arms, on which the State can impose
reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order and the sovereignty and
integrity of India.
Freedom to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India which is also
subject to reasonable restrictions by the State in the interest of the general
public or for the protection of the scheduled tribes because certain safeguards
as are envisaged here seem to be justified to protect indigenous and tribal
peoples from exploitation and coercion. Article 370 restricts citizens from
other Indian states and Kashmiri women who marry men from other states
from purchasing land or property in Jammu & Kashmir.
(2) Nothing in sub clause (a) of clause ( 1 ) shall affect the operation of any
existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law
imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the
said sub clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the
security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order,
decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or
incitement to an offence
(3) Nothing in sub clause (b) of the said clause shall affect the operation of
any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any
law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or
public order, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by
the said sub clause
(4) Nothing in sub clause (c) of the said clause shall affect the operation of
any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any
law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or
public order or morality, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right
conferred by the said sub clause
(5) Nothing in sub clauses (d) and (e) of the said clause shall affect the
operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from
making any law imposing, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of any of
the rights conferred by the said sub clauses either in the interests of the
general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe
(6) Nothing in sub clause (g) of the said clause shall affect the operation of
any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any
law imposing, in the interests of the general public, reasonable restrictions on
the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub clause, and, in particular,
nothing in the said sub clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in
so far as it relates to, or prevent the State from making any law relating to,
In 2002, through the 86th Amendment Act, Article 21(A) was incorporated.
It made the right to primary education part of the right to freedom, stating
that the State would provide free and compulsory education to children from
six to fourteen years of age. Six years after an amendment was made in the
Indian Constitution, the union cabinet cleared the Right to Education Bill in
2008. It is now soon to be tabled in Parliament for approval before it makes a
fundamental right of every child to get free and compulsory education.