Community development

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup
reason has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (February 2009)
(Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Part of a series on

Community

Academic studies

Community studies
Community psychology
Computational sociology
Cultural anthropology
Internet studies
Philosophy of social science
Rural sociology
Social geography
Social philosophy
Social sciences
Sociocultural evolution
Urban planning

Key concepts
Affinity (sociology)
Collectivism
Community of interest
Community of practice
Community of place
Community service
Communitarianism
Community politics
 Group (sociology)
Group dynamics
Imagined community
Organization
Sense of community
Small-group communication
Social capital
Socialization
Solidarity (sociology)

Community development
Community-based management
Community building
Community economic development
Community development planning
Community organizing

See also
Outline
WikiProject Community
Community portal
Category:Community building
Category:Community development
Category:Localism (politics)
Join the Community community

v
t
e

The United Nations defines community development as "a process where community members
come together to take collective action and generate solutions to common problems."[1] It is a
broad term given to the practices of civic leaders, activists, involved citizens and professionals to
improve various aspects of communities, typically aiming to build stronger and more resilient
local communities.
Community development is also understood as a professional discipline, and is defined by the
International Association for Community Development (www.iacdglobal.org), the global
network of community development practitioners and scholars, as "a practice-based profession
and an academic discipline that promotes participative democracy, sustainable development,
rights, economic opportunity, equality and social justice, through the organisation, education and
empowerment of people within their communities, whether these be of locality, identity or
interest, in urban and rural settings".

Community development seeks to empower individuals and groups of people with the skills they
need to effect change within their communities. These skills are often created through the
formation of social groups working for a common agenda. Community developers must
understand both how to work with individuals and how to affect communities' positions within
the context of larger social institutions.

Community development as a term has taken off widely in anglophone countries i.e. the United
States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and New Zealand and other countries in the
Commonwealth of Nations. It is also used in some countries in Eastern Europe with active
community development associations in Hungary and Romania. The Community Development
Journal, published by Oxford University Press, since 1966 has aimed to be the major forum for
research and dissemination of international community development theory and practice.[2]

Community development approaches are recognised internationally. These methods and

approaches have been acknowledged as significant for local social, economic, cultural,
environmental and political development by such organisations as the UN, WHO, OECD, World
Bank, Council of Europe and EU.

Contents
1 Definitions
2 Different approaches
3 History
o 3.1 In the global North
3.1.1 United States
3.1.2 UK
3.1.3 Canada
3.1.4 Australia
o 3.2 In the global South
4 See also
5 References
6 Further reading
7 External links

Definitions
There are complementary definitions of community development.
The United Nations defines community development broadly as "a process where community
members come together to take collective action and generate solutions to common problems."[1]

The Community Development Challenge report, which was produced by a working party
comprising leading UK organizations in the field (including the (now defunct) Community
Development Foundation, the (now defunct) Community Development Exchange and the
Federation for Community Development Learning) defines community development as:

A set of values and practices which plays a special role in overcoming poverty and disadvantage,
knitting society together at the grass roots and deepening democracy. There is a community
development profession, defined by national occupational standards and a body of theory and
experience going back the best part of a century. There are active citizens who use community
development techniques on a voluntary basis, and there are also other professions and agencies
which use a community development approach or some aspects of it.[3]

Community Development Exchange defines community development as:

both an occupation (such as a community development worker in a local authority) and a way of
working with communities. Its key purpose is to build communities based on justice, equality
and mutual respect.

Community development involves changing the relationships between ordinary people and
people in positions of power, so that everyone can take part in the issues that affect their lives. It
starts from the principle that within any community there is a wealth of knowledge and
experience which, if used in creative ways, can be channeled into collective action to achieve the
communities' desired goals.

Community development practitioners work alongside people in communities to help build

relationships with key people and organizations and to identify common concerns. They create
opportunities for the community to learn new skills and, by enabling people to act together,
community development practitioners help to foster social inclusion and equality.[4]

Different approaches
There are numerous overlapping approaches to community development. Some focus on the
processes, some on the outcomes/ objectives. They include:

Women Self-help Group; focusing on the contribution of women in settlement groups.[5]

Community capacity building; focusing on helping communities obtain, strengthen, and
maintain the ability to set and achieve their own development objectives.[6]
Large Group Capacitation; an adult education and social psychology approach
grounded in the activity of the individual and the social psychology of the large group
focusing on large groups of unemployed or semi-employed participants, many of whom
with Lower Levels of Literacy (LLLs).
Social capital formation; focusing on benefits derived from the cooperation between
individuals and groups.
 Nonviolent direct action; when a group of people take action to reveal an existing
problem, highlight an alternative, or demonstrate a possible solution to a social issue
which is not being addressed through traditional societal institutions (governments,
religious organizations or established trade unions) are not addressing to the satisfaction
of the direct action participants.
Economic development, focusing on the "development" of developing countries as
measured by their economies, although it includes the processes and policies by which a
nation improves the economic, political, and social well-being of its people.
Community economic development (CED); an alternative to conventional economic
development which encourages using local resources in a way that enhances economic
outcomes while improving social conditions.
Sustainable development; which seeks to achieve, in a balanced manner, economic
development, social development and environmental protection outcomes.[7]
Community-driven development (CDD), an economic development model which shifts
overreliance on central governments to local communities.
Asset-based community development (ABCD); is a methodology that seeks to uncover
and use the strengths within communities as a means for sustainable development.[8]
Faith-based community development; which utilizes faith-based organizations to bring
about community development outcomes.[9]
Community-based participatory research (CBPR); a partnership approach to research
that equitably involves, for example, community members, organizational
representatives, and researchers in all aspects of the research process and in which all
partners contribute expertise and share decision making and ownership, which aims to
integrate this knowledge with community development outcomes.[10][11]
Community organizing; a term used to describe an approach that generally assumes that
social change necessarily involves conflict and social struggle in order to generate
collective power for the powerless.
Participatory planning including community-based planning (CBP); involving the
entire community in the strategic and management processes of urban planning; or,
community-level planning processes, urban or rural.[12][13]
Language-based development; or Language revitalization focuses on the use of a
language so that it serves the needs of a community. This may involve the creation of
books, films and other media in the language. These actions help a small language
community to preserve their language and culture.[14]
Methodologies focusing on the educational component of community development,
including the community-wide empowerment that increased educational opportunity
creates.
Methodologies addressing the issues and challenges of the Digital divide, making
affordable training and access to computers and the Internet, addressing the
marginalisation of local communities that cannot connect and participate in the global
Online community. In the United States, nonprofit organizations such as Per Scholas
seek to break the cycle of poverty by providing education, technology and economic
opportunities to individuals, families and communities as a path to development for the
communities they serve.[15]
There are a myriad of job titles for community development workers and their employers include
public authorities and voluntary or non-governmental organisations, funded by the state and by
independent grant making bodies. Since the nineteen seventies the prefix word 'community' has
also been adopted by several other occupations from the police and health workers to planners
and architects, who have been influenced by community development approaches.

History
Amongst the earliest community development approaches were those developed in Kenya and
British East Africa during the 1930s. Community development practitioners have over many
years developed a range of approaches for working within local communities and in particular
with disadvantaged people. Since the nineteen sixties and seventies through the various anti
poverty programmes in both developed and developing countries, community development
practitioners have been influenced by structural analyses as to the causes of disadvantage and
poverty i.e. inequalities in the distribution of wealth, income, land, etc. and especially political
power and the need to mobilise people power to affect social change. Thus the influence of such
educators as Paulo Freire and his focus upon this work. Other key people who have influenced
this field are Saul Alinsky (Rules for Radicals) and E.F. Schumacher (Small is Beautiful). There
are a number of international organisations that support community development, for example,
Oxfam, UNICEF, The Hunger Project and Freedom from Hunger, run community development
programs based upon community development initiatives for relief and prevention of
malnutrition. Since 2006 the Dragon Dreaming Project Management techniques have spread to
37 different countries and are engaged in an estimated 3,250 projects worldwide.

In the global North

In the 19th century, the work of the Welsh early socialist thinker Robert Owen (17711851),
sought to create a more perfect community. At New Lanark and at later communities such as
Oneida in the USA and the New Australia Movement in Australia, groups of people came
together to create utopian or intentional communities, with mixed success.

United States

In the United States in the 1960s, the term "community development" began to complement and
generally replace the idea of urban renewal, which typically focused on physical development
projects often at the expense of working-class communities. One of the earliest proponents of the
term in the United States was social scientist William W. Biddle[16] In the late 1960s,
philanthropies such as the Ford Foundation and government officials such as Senator Robert F.
Kennedy took an interest in local nonprofit organizations. A pioneer was the Bedford Stuyvesant
Restoration Corporation in Brooklyn, which attempted to apply business and management skills
to the social mission of uplifting low-income residents and their neighborhoods. Eventually such
groups became known as "Community development corporations" or CDCs. Federal laws
beginning with the 1974 Housing and Community Development Act provided a way for state
and municipal governments to channel funds to CDCs and other nonprofit organizations.
National organizations such as the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (founded in 1978
and now known as NeighborWorks America), the Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC)
(founded in 1980), and the Enterprise Foundation (founded in 1981) have built extensive
networks of affiliated local nonprofit organizations to which they help provide financing for
countless physical and social development programs in urban and rural communities. The CDCs
and similar organizations have been credited with starting the process that stabilized and revived
seemingly hopeless inner city areas such as the South Bronx in New York City.

UK

In the UK Community development has had two main traditions. The first was as an approach
for preparing for the independence of countries from the former British Empire in the 1950s and
1960s. Domestically it first came into public prominence with the Labour Government's anti
deprivation programmes of the latter sixties and seventies. The main example of this being the
CDP (Community Development Programme), which piloted local area based community
development. This influenced a number of largely urban local authorities, in particular in
Scotland with Strathclyde Region's major community development programme (the largest at the
time in Europe).

The Gulbenkian Foundation was a key funder of commissions and reports which influenced the
development of community development in the UK from the latter sixties to the 80's. This
included recommending that there be a national institute or centre for community development,
able to support practice and to advise government and local authorities on policy. This was
formally set up in 1991 as the Community Development Foundation. In 2004 the Carnegie UK
Trust established a Commission of Inquiry into the future of rural community development
examining such issues as land reform and climate change. Carnegie funded over sixty rural
community development action research projects across the UK and Ireland and national and
international communities of practice to exchange experiences. This included the International
Association for Community Development.

In 1999 a UK wide organisation responsible for setting professional training standards for all
education and development practitioners working within local communities was established and
recognised by the Labour Government. This organisation was called PAULO the National
Training Organisation for Community Learning and Development. (It was named after Paulo
Freire). It was formally recognised by David Blunkett, the Secretary of State for Education and
Employment. Its first chair was Charlie McConnell, the Chief Executive of the Scottish
Community Education Council, who had played a lead role in bringing together a range of
occupational interests under a single national training standards body, including community
education, community development and development education. The inclusion of community
development was significant as it was initially uncertain as to whether it would join the NTO for
Social Care. The Community Learning and Development NTO represented all the main
employers, trades unions, professional associations and national development agencies working
in this area across the four nations of the UK.

The term 'community learning and development' was adopted to acknowledge that all of these
occupations worked primarily within local communities, and that this work encompassed not just
providing less formal learning support but also a concern for the wider holistic development of
those communities socio-economically, environmentally, culturally and politically. By
bringing together these occupational groups this created for the first time a single recognised
employment sector of nearly 300,000 full and part-time paid staff within the UK, approximately
10% of these staff being full-time. The NTO continued to recognise the range of different
occupations within it, for example specialists who work primarily with young people, but all
agreed that they shared a core set of professional approaches to their work. In 2002 the NTO
became part of a wider Sector Skills Council for lifelong learning.

The UK currently hosts the only global network of practitioners and activists working towards
social justice through community development approach, the International Association for
Community Development (IACD).[17] IACD was formed in the USA in 1953, moved to Belgium
in 1978 and was restructured and relaunched in Scotland in 1999.[18]

Canada

Community development in Canada has roots in the development of co-operatives, credit unions
and caisses populaires. The Antigonish Movement which started in the 1920s in Nova Scotia,
through the work of Doctor Moses Coady and Father James Tompkins, has been particularly
influential in the subsequent expansion of community economic development work across
Canada...

Australia

Community development in Australia have often been focussed upon Aboriginal Australian
communities, and during the period of the 1980s to the early 21st century were funded through
the Community Employment Development Program, where Aboriginal people could be
employed in "a work for the dole" scheme, which gave the chance for non-government
organisations to apply for a full or part-time worker funded by the Department for Social
Security. Dr Jim Ife, formerly of Curtin University, organised a ground breaking text-book on
community development

In the global South

Community planning techniques drawing on the history of utopian movements became important
in the 1920s and 1930s in East Africa, where community development proposals were seen as a
way of helping local people improve their own lives with indirect assistance from colonial
authorities.[citation needed]

Mohandas K. Gandhi adopted African community development ideals as a basis of his South
African Ashram, and then introduced it as a part of the Indian Swaraj movement, aiming at
establishing economic interdependence at village level throughout India. With Indian
independence, despite the continuing work of Vinoba Bhave in encouraging grassroots land
reform, India under its first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru adopted a mixed-economy
approach, mixing elements of socialism and capitalism.During the fifties and sixties, India ran a
massive community development programme with focus on rural development activities through
government support. This was later expanded in scope and was called integrated rural
development scheme [IRDP]. A large number of initiatives that can come under the community
development umbrella have come up in recent years.

The main objective of community development in India remains to develop the villages and to
help the villagers help themselves to fight against poverty, illiteracy, malnutrition, etc. The
beauty of Indian model of community development lies in the homogeneity of villagers and high
level of participation.

Community development became a part of the Ujamaa Villages established in Tanzania by Julius
Nyerere, where it had some success in assisting with the delivery of education services
throughout rural areas, but has elsewhere met with mixed success. In the 1970s and 1980s,
community development became a part of "Integrated Rural Development", a strategy promoted
by United Nations Agencies and the World Bank. Central to these policies of community
development were

Adult literacy programs, drawing on the work of Brazilian educator Paulo Freire and the
"Each One Teach One" adult literacy teaching method conceived by Frank Laubach.
Youth and women's groups, following the work of the Serowe Brigades of Botswana, of
Patrick van Rensburg.
Development of community business ventures and particularly cooperatives, in part
drawn on the examples of Jos Mara Arizmendiarrieta and the Mondragon Cooperatives
of the Basque region of Spain
Compensatory education for those missing out in the formal education system, drawing
on the work of Open Education as pioneered by Michael Young.
Dissemination of alternative technologies, based upon the work of E. F. Schumacher as
advocated in his book Small is Beautiful: Economics as if people really mattered
Village nutrition programs and permaculture projects, based upon the work of Australians
Bill Mollison and David Holmgren.
Village water supply programs

In the 1990s, following critiques of the mixed success of "top down" government programs, and
drawing on the work of Robert Putnam, in the rediscovery of social capital, community
development internationally became concerned with social capital formation. In particular the
outstanding success of the work of Muhammad Yunus in Bangladesh with the Grameen Bank,
has led to the attempts to spread microenterprise credit schemes around the world. This work was
honoured by the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize.

The "human scale development" work of Right Livelihood Award-winning Chilean economist
Manfred Max Neef promotes the idea of development based upon fundamental human needs,
which are considered to be limited, universal and invariant to all human beings (being a part of
our human condition). He considers that poverty results from the failure to satisfy a particular
human need, it is not just an absence of money. Whilst human needs are limited, Max Neef
shows that the ways of satisfying human needs is potentially unlimited. Satisfiers also have
different characteristics: they can be violators or destroyers, pseudosatisfiers, inhibiting
satisfiers, singular satisfiers, or synergic satisfiers. Max-Neef shows that certain satisfiers,
promoted as satisfying a particular need, in fact inhibit or destroy the possibility of satisfying
other needs: e.g., the arms race, while ostensibly satisfying the need for protection, in fact then
destroys subsistence, participation, affection and freedom; formal democracy, which is supposed
to meet the need for participation often disempowers and alienates; commercial television, while
used to satisfy the need for recreation, interferes with understanding, creativity and identity.
Synergic satisfiers, on the other hand, not only satisfy one particular need, but also lead to
satisfaction in other areas: some examples are breastfeeding; self-managed production; popular
education; democratic community organizations; preventative medicine; meditation; educational
games.

See also

Community portal

Social Welfare and Social Work portal

Community building
Community education
Community engagement
Community practice
Organization workshop
Rural community development
Urbanism

References
1.

"Community development". UNTERM. Retrieved 7 July 2014.

"Community Development Journal- about the journal". Oxford University Press. Retrieved
7 July 2014.
"Community Development Challenge Report" (PDF). Produced by Community Development
Foundation for Communities and Local Government. Retrieved 2009-02-13.
"Definition of CD". Community Development Exchange. Retrieved 2010-06-08.
Chigbu, UE. (2015). Repositioning culture for development: women and development in a
Nigerian rural community. Community, Work & Family, 18,
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13668803.2014.981506#.VSmVekI2nFK
United Nations Development Group. "United Nations Development System- A Collective
Approach to Supporting Capacity Development" (PDF). Retrieved 7 July 2014.
Sung, Hyung. "Sustainable development". General Assembly of the United Nations. General
Assembly of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 July 2014.
Mathie, Alison & Cunningham, Gord (1 Jul 2010). "From clients to citizens: Asset-based
Community Development as a strategy for community-driven development". Development in
practice. 13 (5): 474486. doi:10.1080/0961452032000125857. Retrieved 12 July 2014.
 "Faith-Based Organizations in Community Development". berkleycenter.georgetown.edu.
Retrieved 2017-05-04.
Israel, B.A.; Schulz, A.J.; Parker, E.A.; Becker, A.B. (1998). "Review of community-based
research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health". Annual Review of Public
Health. 19: 173202. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173.
Israel, B.A., Schulz, A.J., Parker, E.A., Becker, A.B., Allen, A., & Guzman, J.R. (2008).
Critical issues in developing and following CBPR Principles. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein
(Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (2nd ed.,
pp. 4766). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lefevre, Pierre; Kolsteren, Patrick; De Wael, Marie-Paule; Byekwaso, Francis; Beghin,
Ivan (December 2000). "Comprehensive Participatory Planning and Evaluation" (PDF).
Antwerp, Belgium: IFAD. Retrieved 2008-10-21.
McTague, C.; Jakubowski, S. (2013). "Marching to the beat of a silent drum: Wasted
consensus-building and failed neighborhood participatory planning". Applied Geography. 44:
182191. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.019.
http://www-01.sil.org/sil/global/MDG_booklet.pdf
"Per Scholas Website". Per Scholas Website. Retrieved July 6, 2014.
List, E. Frederick (1973). "In Memoriam: William W. Biddle". Journal of the Community
Development Society. 4 (1): 5. doi:10.1080/00103829.1973.10877482.
"International Association for Community Development". Retrieved 7 July 2014.

18. "IACD- a brief history". Retrieved 7 July 2014.

Further reading
Briggs, Xavier de Souza, and Elizabeth Mueller and Mercer Sullivan, From
Neighborhood to Community: Evidence on the Social Effects of Community
Development Corporation. Community Development Research Center, 1997.
Ferguson, Ronald F. and William T. Dickens, eds., Urban Problems and Community
Development. Brookings Institution Press, 1999. ISBN 0-8157-1875-6, ISBN 978-0-
8157-1875-8
Grogan, Paul and Tony Proscio, Comeback Cities: A Blueprint for Urban Neighborhood
Revival. Westview Press, 2002. ISBN 0-8133-3952-9, ISBN 978-0-8133-3952-8
von Hoffman, Alexander, House by House, Block by Block: The Rebirth of America's
Urban Neighborhoods. Oxford University Press, 2003, Ppbck. ed., 2004. ISBN 0-19-
517614-6, ISBN 978-0-19-517614-8
James, Paul; Nadarajah, Yaso; Haive, Karen; Stead, Victoria (2012). Sustainable
Communities, Sustainable Development: Other Paths for Papua New Guinea (PDF).
Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Kingslow, Marcia E.; Horton, Carol (1998), An Overview of the Major Asset Building
and Community Development Literatures (PDF), Chicago, IL: Kingslow Associates,
retrieved 16 September 2017
Magee, Liam; James, Paul; Scerri, Andy (2012). "Measuring Social Sustainability: A
Community-Centred Approach". Applied Research in the Quality of Life. 7 (3): 23961.
doi:10.1007/s11482-012-9166-x.
 McConnell, Charlie, Community Learning and Development: The Making of an
Empowering Profession. Community Learning Scotland/PAULO, 2002, ISBN 0 947919
75 9
Silverman, Robert Mark (2003). "Progressive Reform, Gender, and Institutional
Structure: A Critical Analysis of Citizen Participation in Detroit's Community
Development Corporations (CDCs)". Urban Studies. 40 (13): 27312750.
doi:10.1080/0042098032000146867.
Sloman, Annie (2011). "Using Participatory Theatre in International Community
Development". Community Development Journal (January 2012). 47 (1): 4257.
doi:10.1093/cdj/bsq059.

External links
Shelterforce A nonprofit magazine on community development, affordable housing,
and neighborhood stabilization.

SUMBER: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_development