Reflexive Relations
Reflexive Relations
Reflexive Relations
Contents
1 Definition
2 Describing sets
3 Membership
3.1 Subsets
3.2 Power sets
4 Cardinality
5 Special sets
6 Basic operations
6.1 Unions
6.2 Intersections
6.3 Complements
6.4 Cartesian product
7 Applications
8 Axiomatic set theory
9 Principle of inclusion and exclusion
10 De Morgan's laws
11 See also
12 Notes
13 References
14 External links
Definition
A set is a well-defined collection of distinct objects. The objects that
make up a set (also known as the elements or members of a set) can be
anything: numbers, people, letters of the alphabet, other sets, and so on.
Georg Cantor, the founder of set theory, gave the following definition
of a set at the beginning of his Beitrge zur Begrndung der
transfiniten Mengenlehre:[1]
Passage with a translation of the original
set definition of Georg Cantor. Note that
A set is a gathering together into a whole of definite, the German word Menge for set is
distinct objects of our perception [Anschauung] or of our translated with aggregate here.
thoughtwhich are called elements of the set.
Sets are conventionally denoted with capital letters. Sets A and B are equal if and only if they have precisely the
same elements.[2]
Cantor's definition turned out to be inadequate; instead, the notion of a "set" is taken as a primitive notion in
axiomatic set theory, and the properties of sets are defined by a collection of axioms. The most basic properties
are that a set can have elements, and that two sets are equal (one and the same) if and only if every element of
each set is an element of the other; this property is called the extensionality of sets.
Describing sets
There are two ways of describing, or specifying the members of, a set. One way is by intensional definition,
using a rule or semantic description:
A is the set whose members are the first four positive integers.
B is the set of colors of the French flag.
The second way is by extension that is, listing each member of the set. An extensional definition is denoted
by enclosing the list of members in curly brackets:
C = {4, 2, 1, 3}
D = {blue, white, red}.
One often has the choice of specifying a set either intensionally or extensionally. In the examples above, for
instance, A = C and B = D.
There are two important points to note about sets. First, in an extensional definition, a set member can be listed
two or more times, for example, {11, 6, 6}. However, per extensionality, two definitions of sets which differ
only in that one of the definitions lists set members multiple times, define, in fact, the same set. Hence, the set
{11, 6, 6} is exactly identical to the set {11, 6}. The second important point is that the order in which the
elements of a set are listed is irrelevant (unlike for a sequence or tuple). We can illustrate these two important
points with an example:
For sets with many elements, the enumeration of members can be abbreviated. For instance, the set of the first
thousand positive integers may be specified extensionally as
where the ellipsis ("...") indicates that the list continues in the obvious way. Ellipses may also be used where
sets have infinitely many members. Thus the set of positive even numbers can be written as {2, 4, 6, 8, ... }.
The notation with braces may also be used in an intensional specification of a set. In this usage, the braces have
the meaning "the set of all ...". So, E = {playing card suits} is the set whose four members are , , , and . A
more general form of this is set-builder notation, through which, for instance, the set F of the twenty smallest
integers that are four less than perfect squares can be denoted
In this notation, the colon (":") means "such that", and the description can be interpreted as "F is the set of all
numbers of the form n2 4, such that n is a whole number in the range from 0 to 19 inclusive." Sometimes the
vertical bar ("|") is used instead of the colon.
Membership
If B is a set and x is one of the objects of B, this is denoted x B, and is read as "x belongs to B", or "x is an
element of B". If y is not a member of B then this is written as y B, and is read as "y does not belong to B".
For example, with respect to the sets A = {1,2,3,4}, B = {blue, white, red}, and F = {n2 4 : n is an integer;
and 0 n 19} defined above,
4 A and 12 F; but
9 F and green B.
Subsets
If every member of set A is also a member of set B, then A is said to be a subset of B, written A B (also
pronounced A is contained in B). Equivalently, we can write B A, read as B is a superset of A, B includes A,
or B contains A. The relationship between sets established by is called inclusion or containment.
If A is a subset of, but not equal to, B, then A is called a proper subset of B, written A B (A is a proper subset
of B) or B A (B is a proper superset of A).
Note that the expressions A B and B A are used differently by different authors; some authors use them to
mean the same as A B (respectively B A), whereas others use them to mean the same as A B
(respectively B A).
Example:
The set of all men is a proper subset of the set of all people.
{1, 3} {1, 2, 3, 4}.
{1, 2, 3, 4} {1, 2, 3, 4}.
The empty set is a subset of every set and every set is a subset of itself:
A.
A A. A is a subset of B
An obvious but useful identity, which can often be used to show that two
seemingly different sets are equal:
A partition of a set S is a set of nonempty subsets of S such that every element x in S is in exactly one of these
subsets.
Power sets
The power set of a set S is the set of all subsets of S. Note that the power set contains S itself and the empty set
because these are both subsets of S. For example, the power set of the set {1, 2, 3} is {{1, 2, 3}, {1, 2}, {1, 3},
{2, 3}, {1}, {2}, {3}, }. The power set of a set S is usually written as P(S).
The power set of a finite set with n elements has 2n elements. For example, the set {1, 2, 3} contains three
elements, and the power set shown above contains 23 = 8 elements.
The power set of an infinite (either countable or uncountable) set is always uncountable. Moreover, the power
set of a set is always strictly "bigger" than the original set in the sense that there is no way to pair every element
of S with exactly one element of P(S). (There is never an onto map or surjection from S onto P(S).)
There is a unique set with no members, called the empty set (or the null set), which is denoted by the symbol
(other notations are used; see empty set). The cardinality of the empty set is zero. For example, the set of all
three-sided squares has zero members and thus is the empty set. Though it may seem trivial, the empty set, like
the number zero, is important in mathematics. Indeed, the existence of this set is one of the fundamental
concepts of axiomatic set theory.
Some sets have infinite cardinality. The set N of natural numbers, for instance, is infinite. Some infinite
cardinalities are greater than others. For instance, the set of real numbers has greater cardinality than the set of
natural numbers. However, it can be shown that the cardinality of (which is to say, the number of points on) a
straight line is the same as the cardinality of any segment of that line, of the entire plane, and indeed of any
finite-dimensional Euclidean space.
Special sets
There are some sets that hold great mathematical importance and are referred to with such regularity that they
have acquired special names and notational conventions to identify them. One of these is the empty set, denoted
{} or . Another is the unit set {x}, which contains exactly one element, namely x.[2] Many of these sets are
represented using blackboard bold or bold typeface. Special sets of numbers include
P or , denoting the set of all primes: P = {2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, ...}.
N or , denoting the set of all natural numbers: N = {0, 1, 2, 3, . . .} (sometimes defined excluding 0).
Z or , denoting the set of all integers (whether positive, negative or zero): Z = {..., 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, ...}.
Q or , denoting the set of all rational numbers (that is, the set of all proper and improper fractions): Q =
{a/b : a, b Z, b 0}. For example, 1/4 Q and 11/6 Q. All integers are in this set since every
integer a can be expressed as the fraction a/1 (Z Q).
R or , denoting the set of all real numbers. This set includes all rational numbers, together with all
irrational numbers (that is, numbers that cannot be rewritten as fractions, such as 2, as well as
transcendental numbers such as , e and numbers that cannot be defined).
C or , denoting the set of all complex numbers: C = {a + bi : a, b R}. For example, 1 + 2i C.
H or , denoting the set of all quaternions: H = {a + bi + cj + dk : a, b, c, d R}. For example, 1 + i +
2j k H.
Positive and negative sets are denoted by a superscript - or +. For example, + represents the set of positive
rational numbers.
Each of the above sets of numbers has an infinite number of elements, and each can be considered to be a
proper subset of the sets listed below it. The primes are used less frequently than the others outside of number
theory and related fields.
Basic operations
There are several fundamental operations for constructing new sets from given sets.
Unions
Two sets can be "added" together. The union of A and B, denoted by A B, is the set of all things that are
members of either A or B.
Examples:
{1, 2} {1, 2} = {1, 2}.
{1, 2} {2, 3} = {1, 2, 3}.
{1, 2, 3} {3, 4, 5} = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}
A B = B A.
A (B C) = (A B) C.
A (A B).
A A = A.
The union of A and B, denoted A B
A = A.
A B if and only if A B = B.
Intersections
A new set can also be constructed by determining which members two sets have "in common". The intersection
of A and B, denoted by A B, is the set of all things that are members of both A and B. If A B = , then A
and B are said to be disjoint.
Examples:
A B = B A.
A (B C) = (A B) C.
A B A.
A A = A. The intersection of A and B, denoted
A = . A B.
A B if and only if A B = A.
Complements
{1, 2} \ {1, 2} = .
{1, 2, 3, 4} \ {1, 3} = {2, 4}.
If U is the set of integers, E is the set of even integers, and O is the set of odd integers, then U \ E =
E = O.
A \ B B \ A for A B.
A A = U.
A A = .
(A) = A.
A \ A = .
U = and = U.
A \ B = A B.
The complement of A in U
For example, the symmetric difference of {7,8,9,10} and {9,10,11,12}
is the set {7,8,11,12}. The power set of any set becomes a Boolean ring
with symmetric difference as the addition of the ring (with the empty
set as neutral element) and intersection as the multiplication of the ring.
Cartesian product
Examples:
{1, 2} {red, white, green} = {(1, red), (1, white), (1, green), (2, red), (2, white), (2, green)}.
{1, 2} {1, 2} = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 1), (2, 2)}.
{a, b, c} {d, e, f} = {(a, d), (a, e), (a, f), (b, d), (b, e), (b, f), (c, d), (c, e), (c, f)}.
A = .
A (B C) = (A B) (A C).
(A B) C = (A C) (B C).
Let A and B be finite sets; then the cardinality of the Cartesian product is the product of the cardinalities:
| A B | = | B A | = | A | | B |.
Applications
Set theory is seen as the foundation from which virtually all of mathematics can be derived. For example,
structures in abstract algebra, such as groups, fields and rings, are sets closed under one or more operations.
One of the main applications of naive set theory is constructing relations. A relation from a domain A to a
codomain B is a subset of the Cartesian product A B. Given this concept, we are quick to see that the set F of
all ordered pairs (x, x2), where x is real, is quite familiar. It has a domain set R and a codomain set that is also
R, because the set of all squares is subset of the set of all reals. If placed in functional notation, this relation
becomes f(x) = x2. The reason these two are equivalent is for any given value, y that the function is defined for,
its corresponding ordered pair, (y, y2) is a member of the set F.
Russell's paradoxIt shows that the "set of all sets that do not contain themselves," i.e. the "set" { x : x is
a set and x x } does not exist.
Cantor's paradoxIt shows that "the set of all sets" cannot exist.
The reason is that the phrase well-defined is not very well defined. It was important to free set theory of these
paradoxes because nearly all of mathematics was being redefined in terms of set theory. In an attempt to avoid
these paradoxes, set theory was axiomatized based on first-order logic, and thus axiomatic set theory was
born.
A more general form of the principle can be used to find the cardinality
of any finite union of sets:
The inclusion-exclusion principle can be
used to calculate the size of the union of
sets: the size of the union is the size of
the two sets, minus the size of their
intersection.
De Morgan's laws
Augustus De Morgan stated two laws about sets.
(A B) = A B
The complement of A union B equals the complement of A intersected with the complement of B.
(A B) = A B
The complement of A intersected with B is equal to the complement of A union to the complement of B.
See also
Set notation Mereology
Mathematical object Multiset
Alternative set theory Naive set theory
Axiomatic set theory Principia Mathematica
Category of sets Rough set
Class (set theory) Russell's paradox
Dense set Sequence (mathematics)
Family of sets Taxonomy
Fuzzy set Tuple
Internal set
Notes
1. "Eine Menge, ist die Zusammenfassung bestimmter, wohlunterschiedener Objekte unserer Anschauung
oder unseres Denkens welche Elemente der Menge genannt werden zu einem Ganzen." [1] (http://ww
w.brinkmann-du.de/mathe/fos/fos01_03.htm)
2. Stoll, Robert. Sets, Logic and Axiomatic Theories. W. H. Freeman and Company. p. 5.
References
Dauben, Joseph W., Georg Cantor: His Mathematics and Philosophy of the Infinite, Boston: Harvard
University Press (1979) ISBN 978-0-691-02447-9.
Halmos, Paul R., Naive Set Theory, Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand (1960) ISBN 0-387-90092-6.
Stoll, Robert R., Set Theory and Logic, Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications (1979) ISBN 0-486-63829-4.
Velleman, Daniel, How To Prove It: A Structured Approach, Cambridge University Press (2006)
ISBN 978-0-521-67599-4
External links
C2 Wiki Examples of set operations using English operators.
Mathematical Sets: Elements, Intersections & Unions, Education Portal Academy