How To Develop A CRM Strategy
How To Develop A CRM Strategy
How To Develop A CRM Strategy
Almost every company that has benefited from a customer relationship management
initiative has done so after developing a coherent CRM strategy. This document offers
guidance on creating such a strategy.
2004 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior
written permission is forbidden. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable.
Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Gartner shall have no
liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof. The reader
assumes sole responsibility for the selection of these materials to achieve its intended results. The opinions expressed
herein are subject to change without notice.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. A CRM Vision Must Take the Customer Viewpoint and Answer: Why and How? ............. 6
Figure 2. Creating the CRM Vision.................................................................................................... 7
Figure 3. Knowledge Transfer Between Board and CRM Team....................................................... 8
Figure 4. Internal and External Inputs Into CRM Strategy .............................................................. 10
Figure 5. Customer Value Relationship Matrix................................................................................ 11
Figure 6. Relationship Investment Guide ........................................................................................ 12
Figure 7. CRM Internal Capability Assessment............................................................................... 13
Figure 8. Comparing the Elements of Marketing and CRM Strategies ........................................... 15
Figure 9. Segmentation and Customer Value ................................................................................. 16
Figure 10. Segment-Based Resource Allocation ............................................................................ 18
Management Summary
Gartner has run a CRM Excellence Award since 2001 and has examined what made the finalists
stand out from the other entries. We found that the most successful had a coherent, simple,
widely understood strategy with associated metrics that were well defined. The finalists' strategies
were backed by senior executives and most had laid out a governance structure to ensure their
strategies succeeded. In many other cases, the CRM strategies either did not exist, had ceased
to be relevant to the organization, had no leadership support or were not understood outside a
handful of executives' heads. Therefore, getting the CRM strategy right is clearly a prerequisite
for a successful initiative.
This report is designed to aid the CRM project manager, executive sponsor or operations
executive who is seeking help in building a CRM strategy. It is not intended to provide a template
for a strategy document, because all organizations are unique and no two strategies are alike.
Instead, this report provides guidance and help by providing successful models and frameworks
alongside case studies and examples. It has four main sections.
How will companies effectively manage increased service and communication to build
real customer loyalty?
Set the destination: The vision of the company and the goals derived from this vision are
the intended destination of the CRM strategy. The vision will be heavily dependent on
the leadership of the company and on which definition of CRM is used.
Audit the current situation: Skills, resources, competitors, partners and, of course,
customers all need to be consulted in assessing the start point.
Map the journey: The journey may take many years, and the map will change along the
route. It is important to plan for this before starting.
The creation of boundaries for CRM, so that it does not encompass everything and
anything to do with customers
Buy-in from those involved in its creation and, ultimately, its execution
An acceleration in the process of defining a CRM vision, because the definition and the
vision are inextricably linked
Gartner recommends collecting several definitions of CRM, particularly from organizations within
the same industry, from those with similar goals; or from those that are seen as successful at
CRM, to draw inspiration and identify common characteristics. However, it is important not to take
an "off the shelf" definition and then proceed to create a unique one for your company. Once the
definition has been fixed, the CRM vision can set out who the customers are and why CRM
needs to take place. The strategy can then determine how it will happen. Moreover, once a
definition of CRM is reached, the expression of a CRM vision is far easier to establish.
Action Item: Companies should examine as many definitions of CRM as possible but should
create their own definition to gain buy-in and cohesiveness from those involved in the initiative.
How? How?
Make customers assets safe Increase propensity to buy
Weed out unprofitable customers Increase frequency of purchase
Create emotional contract with brand Deliver value in a personalized way
How?
For example, change customer experience, organizational structures, metrics,
processes, behaviors, technologies, data and information
The focus can be subtler with customer-centered goals like increased customer commitment and
loyalty, which will feed back to greater profitability over a longer period of time. These goals are
more difficult to measure. Usually, there is a mix of cost-reduction and revenue-enhancing goals
in the vision.
However, a true CRM vision should consider the future state from the customer's perspective:
What will the customer gain from the CRM strategy? How will the customer's value proposition
differ from the current situation?
Action Item: A CRM vision should be able to articulate the future environment for the organization
in terms of profitability and also the future customer experience.
Customer experience
Differentiating
brand values
The customer relationship The vision is the
management vision is a what and why;
Core value
picture of what the the strategy is
proposition
company wants the how.
to be to target
customers.
These values should be determined from the customer's viewpoint. Too many organizations think
they know what customers want, but instead discover, through costly mistakes, that they do not.
They overinvest in services that customers do not want or value, and they do not invest enough in
the elements of service delivery that would generate real value and loyalty. Finally, there is an
outline of what the customer experience should be for different situations and segments.
Action Item: Examine the current core value proposition for customers: Is there one? Is it different
from that of competitors? Is it understood by, and motivating for, employees? And do customers
associate the organization with it?
A key factor in the early stages of an initiative is the mutual education of the main board or
executive council, and the program management team. The board/executive council must be
educated on the changes required as part of CRM. However, the program management team
must know what the board is thinking and how the business strategy may evolve.
Action Item: During the initial stages of the CRM initiative while the CRM vision and strategy
are being developed the program management, executive council and board-level sponsors
must commit time to mutual education workshops.
Seek input on the current causes of pain from multiple external customers and partners,
and internal sources like frontline employees from different business functions.
Find out what matters most to customers in dealing with the organization.
Assess the organization's own capabilities to deliver on a CRM initiative. This will
include assessing the state of customer data, mapping customer-facing processes,
collating and assessing the metrics used to measure customer-facing departments and
the level of focus that the organization is placing on its customers. Use the assessment
to evaluate the organization against equivalents in the same or similar industries.
Lack of understanding at board-level: "We want it done by Christmas." The board has
little customer or CRM understanding or involvement.
Lack of adjustment to compensation structures: "I'm not paid to do that." Rewards and
incentives tied to old, non-customer objectives.
Employee culture does not change: "So what do I do differently? It's all a load of hype!"
Staff culture does not have a relentless focus on the customer.
Customer input is nonexistent or limited in developing the strategy: "We know what they
want." Limited or no input from the customers' perspective.
Thinking that buying a software package will create CRM, and forgetting that
architecture and integration issues are bigger and more expensive: "Send someone to
that exhibition for brochures."
Independent or inappropriate processes: "I have to have your date of birth again." Lack
of specifically designed, mutually reinforcing processes (that is, strategy).
Poor-quality data on customers, leading to poor analysis and decision making: "We
need to collect all our data on all our customers and 'data mine' it."
The CRM team focuses too much on IT or back-office functions and with short-term
project time scales, while ongoing business operations do not get involved: "Whom can
we send on the CRM project that we can live without for six months?"
Often, past CRM projects and initiatives failed to meet expectations, but still delivered a
positive return on investment. Outright failures are rare; occurring less than 15 percent
of the time. Before rejuvenating a CRM initiative, companies should spend time
measuring what has gone before, wherever possible. It is also important to spend time
interviewing past participants on what they thought went wrong. In many cases, the
assumptions, business case and goals of past projects remain valid, even if the
execution was not as successful as hoped.
External External
Resources
Technology Vision
Capability
External External
Without internal and external information sources, there may be serious miscalculations in the
CRM strategy, not only about customer and consumer needs, but also about the internal
capabilities to deliver to those needs. Customer and consumer information must be weighted
highest. However, to set new standards of service, it is sometimes critical to override customer
perceptions, as they are bound by past experiences. Therefore, customer feedback cannot be
used as the only input.
Beware generic discussions about the relationship between customer and supplier, and focus on
the highest pain points. The more specific the problems, and the better the examples given by
customers and frontline staff, the more immediate the understanding of those approving
businesses cases.
Action Item: Beware of short cuts in information gathering when assessing the current customer
relationship situation. Seek information from external sources first, and weight customer and
consumer feedback highest.
The result is a customer value relationship matrix that combines the supplier's view of customer
value segments which can be derived by examining current profitability or expectations of
future potential (such as lifetime value) with a measure of the current strength of the
relationship from the customer's perspective (that is, derived by looking at satisfaction and
loyalty). The intersection will then determine the objectives and strategies by segment.
Measurements of current and future profitability should be one of the first things companies
consult when estimating relationship value, even though the allocation of fixed costs across
customers may be difficult. However, understanding the strength of the relationship from the
customer's perspective is equally important, and this is where primary research is usually
required.
Were hidden and which the company had not realized were important
All of these factors can be compared with those of competitors and detailed by customer
segment.
Below average
Poor
Hidden
Low Overspending opportunities
Process management
Such models should include an examination of people and organizations, process management,
analysis and planning capabilities, measurement, the value proposition, customer experience,
applications and the supporting technology infrastructure. Gartner's version of this holistic view of
internal capabilities is called the Gartner CRM Maturity Model. It focuses on capabilities for
organizational collaboration and a valued customer experience.
Action Item: Perform a gap analysis on internal capabilities before starting the initiative, and
perform benchmark tests against other companies where possible.
Rational: A structured, formal approach to planning that sets out to find and implement
the optimal strategy in a given market. The result is a style in which organizational and
political constraints are to be overcome, not accommodated.
Pragmatic: Another formal approach to strategic planning, but one that accommodates
the various constraints, rules and procedures governing the organizational units involved
in execution.
Opportunistic: An approach that views the world as too complex and uncertain to be
captured by a formal, strategic planning process, which would be unreliable and slow.
Opportunistic strategy is a mixture of instinct and exploitation of events, without reliable
rules. Strategy can be imposed by decree, or built through ad hoc collaborations.
Many organizations use the political and opportunistic models for planning. And they offer no
clear, up-to-date and explicit plan for the CRM strategy to attach to. Failing to anchor a CRM
strategy to company one may mean that the people that develop it lose their jobs, because it is
perceived to be out of touch with business reality.
The main challenges in developing a CRM strategy without a company strategy are:
Executive whim. Less formal styles of strategic planning are more dynamic and prone to
the whims of senior executives. Managers developing a CRM strategy must stay close
to influential individuals or be left behind. CRM senior executives must be quick to
change course if required.
Lack of executive consensus. One executive may sanction actions without the
agreement of others. If that executive is replaced, there may be a backlash against CRM
because it is seen as his or her personal foible. The head of a CRM strategy must verify
individual executive thinking with other executives.
Business units or regions filling the planning void. Business units may implement their
own strategies without interference from headquarters because they can act to achieve
their own local or personal goals (for example, specific profit, revenue or volume
targets).
Need for faster paybacks. Managers must understand the economic payoff from the
CRM strategy. This is critical because enterprise-level strategy is more likely to change
in the short term. Thus, the CRM strategy must justify its investment more rigorously to
senior executives and business unit heads. The CRM team should recruit from the
finance team.
Ad hoc inputs. CRM strategies have many different inputs, including marketing, sales,
operations, business units, market research, customers, external agencies and
consultancies. Senior executives provide key inputs, yet there may be no formal process
for channeling and auditing this input.
4.2 The Differences Between the Marketing Strategy and CRM Strategy
The first part of a CRM strategy audits where the organization is and what its objectives are.
Many companies have a marketing strategy or should have that needs to be revisited to
develop the CRM strategy (see Figure 8).
Since its rise as a business discipline, the aim of marketing has always been to put the customer
at the front of the "production function." So instead of "produce-sell-customer," the business
process is "understand customer needs-produce-sell-customer." However, as companies grew,
they could only do this at an aggregate, mass-market level at best. What has changed now is that
technology is enabling businesses to do this at a far more granular or even personal level (if
required). In addition, customers are demanding more value, and service is increasingly the key
to sales. The technology is there, but business practices and strategy are not making the most of
it.
The development of the CRM strategy from the marketing strategy is outlined in Figure 8. The
biggest difference between the two is that the marketing strategy is concerned with placing the
organization in its chosen field in relation to competitors, while the CRM strategy is concerned
$1,500
Source: KPMG
Product line
Region
Frequency of purchases
Current profitability
All these measures are valid; but, increasingly, future profitability is also being used as a better
measure of attractiveness to the supplier. Since 1997, banks in particular have started to
segment by current and future profitability, and then mapped CVPs, resources, management and
a customer life cycle contact strategy onto each segment. However, agreeing definitions of
profitability are difficult. If there are large fixed costs to be allocated, they can swamp any profit
Less One:One
than to Dedicated
10% One:Few Few:One account
To teams
Share of
10% One:One
Buying
to
Power
50% One:Many
More One:Few
than Dedicated
50% Hunters
Call
center Less than $6 to More than
model $6 million $12 million $12 million
Buying Power
It is easy to visualize the benefits of changing sales resources-to-account ratios, so that the
largest customer accounts have the most support; and greater customer "spend" is rewarded with
greater attentiveness if this is what the customer wants. The hidden danger is that customer
movements across segments are more dynamic than product changes in many vertical sectors.
Therefore, the real challenge of segment-based strategies and resource allocation is to
dynamically alter budgets, behaviors and management attention as individual customers move
between segments.
Action Item: Focus on building processes and systems that can be altered rapidly and
dynamically as individual customers move between segments.
Culture
Understand
Delivery others
Confident Proactive
Proactive
Detailed
Service
contact
Values
Educate Quality Accessible Collaborative Solidarity
Social National
Mission
Committed Specialist Expert
Definitive mission
I
source Impartial
Supportive Leadership Heritage Pride
Staff feel
valued Innovation Custodian
Knowledgeable
Technically Up-to-date
Sense advanced
of purpose Inspired
Optimistic drive
At the delivery level, it set out to find more detailed information on how those values would need
to be delivered to customers. Service delivery had to be knowledgeable, up-to-date, impartial,
collaborative, proactive and technically advanced. Finally, it examined the type of culture it would
require to ensure the values were met and the brand position achieved. It then set about
influencing and changing its existing culture to match, and supporting the delivery mechanisms
that, in turn, support the customer values that were in demand.
Action Item: Brand-value model development should be used to help develop a CRM strategy.
Selection
How can the
company How will the
increase the company
loyalty and Extension Customer Acquisition acquire this
profitability of customer in an
this customer? effective way?
Retention
When using a life cycle approach, marketing organizations must first make tough decisions about
which customers will truly be the most profitable and will receive more focused attention. After
customers are identified, a sales channel and field marketing or trade promotion strategy must be
developed. The strategy will determine which products will be most suitable for each customer.
Once customers are acquired, salespeople need to work in tandem with customer service to
improve or maintain retention and renewal rates. The result is that the days of the marketing,
sales and customer service organizations working in isolation are gone. A CRM strategy will
affect these organizations and many others within the company, including billing and finance. As
such, companies will be required to:
Define a CRM strategy that takes a customer life cycle perspective from the start
$15,000
10,000
5,000
0
(500)
(1,000)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Household deciles ranked by profit
With a more complete vision, the job of filling in the strategy's details and the tactics to be used
to develop the customer will be easier and more coordinated. When the detail is done, the
capabilities that the company needs to deliver the strategy will become clear. Understanding this
will mean that building a capability can be prioritized in the infrastructure road map. The strategy
and tactics also aid in building relevant customer processes.
Most organizations that Gartner speaks with have multiple objectives behind their CRM initiatives.
Typically, one objective dominates, but there are several others. The average number of
objectives in the survey in Figure 15 was six.
Not all objectives are mutually exclusive; many are subsets of each other. For example,
enhanced cross-sell can be seen as contributing to enhanced profitability per customer, although
the connection between these objectives is not guaranteed.
Action Item: Beware of having too many top-line objectives for CRM initiatives three to five is
sufficient.
Real examples of CRM objectives include:
Measure the propensity to churn, expected lifetime value, and propensity to accept
discounts and special marketing offers
Retain the most valuable customers to gain revenue in the short term
CRM metrics should not be viewed as an amorphous whole. There is a hierarchy of metrics
required, depending on their purpose and who is using them. Gartner proposes four levels of
metrics:
Corporate
Customer-strategic
Operational
Performance
Examples are outlined above. There are two primary challenges to developing CRM metrics:
Complete
Restricted
In a strong economy and with restricted access to customer information, "Mass Marketing Rules"
best describes the scenario. Where access to customer information is restricted and the economy
is weak, a chaotic "dog-eat-dog" world prevails, and the scenario is "CRM in Deep Freeze." The
next "Niche Marketing Wins" scenario is a weak economy, and companies have complete access
to customer information. Customer segmentation is an imperative because highly profitable
customers are few. Gartner's final scenario, "Relationships Are King," is the networked world
6.0 Conclusion
To assist organizations in their efforts to create CRM vision and strategy, Gartner offers these
recommendations:
Where is the company heading? Articulate the desired result of the initiative.
Why is the company going there? Describe the benefits to the organization and its
customers.
What is the company's start point? Audit internally the current capabilities of the
organization and the current customer experience.
Which customers does the company want? Segment the customer base by current
and future value, and set objectives for each segment.
How is the company going to get there? Show the steps that must be taken to
achieve the vision.
Establish the company's market position against requirements and competitors. Define a
"valued" and different customer proposition.
Make the brand part of the company culture to deliver the proposition.
Value the company on the potential of its customer base not just on current profit.
Establish the motivating factors for customer loyalty. Where does the company need to
excel, and where can it cut costs? Are there any "gems"?
Develop skills in the new areas of customer relationship building (such as service,
contact strategies and relationship models). Understand what technology enables the
company to do.
Ultimately, a CRM strategy should:
REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS