Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10K views

    Letter To Chief Justice Matthew Durrant

    Uploaded by

    The Salt Lake Tribune
    Legislative leaders sent this letter to court officials in October, asking them to hold off on implementing a new tool that would give more information to judges who are deciding bail amounts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Letter To Chief Justice Matthew Durrant

    Uploaded by

    The Salt Lake Tribune
    10K views2 pages
    Legislative leaders sent this letter to court officials in October, asking them to hold off on implementing a new tool that would give more information to judges who are deciding bail amounts.

    Original Title

    Letter to Chief Justice Matthew Durrant

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Legislative leaders sent this letter to court officials in October, asking them to hold off on implementing a new tool that would give more information to judges who are deciding bail amounts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    10K views2 pages

    Letter To Chief Justice Matthew Durrant

    Uploaded by

    The Salt Lake Tribune
    Legislative leaders sent this letter to court officials in October, asking them to hold off on implementing a new tool that would give more information to judges who are deciding bail amounts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Utah State Legislature

    Senate Utah State Capitol Complex 320 State Capitol


    PO BOX 145115 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5115
    (801) 538-1035 fax (801) 538-1414

    House of Representatives Utah State Capitol Complex 350 State Capitol


    PO BOX 145030 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5030
    http://le.utah.gov (801) 538-1029 fax (801) 538-1908

    October 3, 2017

    Chief Justice Matthew B. Durrant Administrator Richard Schwermer


    450 South State Street, Fifth Floor 450 South State Street, Third Floor
    Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Salt Lake City, UT 84114

    Dear Chief Justice Durrant and Administrator Schwermer,

    This letter addresses our concern that the Judiciary intends to require or authorize each state
    district court judge to use a pretrial risk assessment tool to assist the judge in deciding the
    disposition of pretrial detainees. Specifically, we urge you not to implement, or require the use
    of, any pretrial risk assessment tool. We also request that you work with the Legislature and
    other relevant parties to develop possible legislation for the 2018 annual general session that
    implements, provides standards and requirements for, and directs the application of, any pretrial
    risk assessment tool.

    We understand that judges have discretion, based upon standards established by the Legislature,
    to determine the disposition of pretrial detainees. We are also aware that several national groups
    recommend providing judges with tools to allow them to make decisions about the disposition of
    pretrial detainees. Those groups advocate providing judges with predictive criteria that have been
    statistically demonstrated to provide conclusions about whether a pretrial detainee who is
    released into the community will need to return to court, will harm the justice system, or will
    endanger the community. Our research found that nine states have implemented pretrial risk
    assessment requirements. In eight of those states, the legislature has authorized or directed the
    judiciary to obtain a pretrial risk assessment tool and use its conclusions as one of the factors to
    be used by a judge in determining the appropriate disposition of a pretrial detainee. In only one
    state, Arizona, has the judicial branch implemented a pretrial risk assessment tool without
    legislative or constitutional direction.

    To us, the question of which branch of government has authority to mandate or direct the use of
    a pretrial risk assessment tool raises separation of powers concerns. In general, the Utah Supreme
    Court has analyzed questions like this one by determining whether the requirement is simply a
    rule of procedure, which is generally a judicial function, or if it creates a substantive right or
    establishes a policy, which is generally a legislative function. The Utah Constitution authorizes
    the Utah Supreme Court to adopt rules of evidence and procedure to be used in the courts of the
    State. Utah Constitution, Article VIII, Section 4. However, the Utah Supreme Court has also
    stated that: Simply stated, legislative powers are policy making powers . . . . Carter v. Lehi
    City, 2012 UT 2, 38, 269 P.3d 14 (internal citations and quotations omitted). In our opinion,
    because the question of whether or not to use a pretrial risk assessment tool raises substantial
    policy questions, the Legislature is the appropriate branch to decide if and in what form a pretrial
    risk assessment tool should be used by Utahs courts.

    Consequently, we request that the judicial branch, or either of you, not require or authorize the
    use of any statewide pretrial risk assessment tool until the Legislature has affirmatively
    authorized you to do so. We look forward to working with your representatives on possible
    legislation that addresses a pretrial risk assessment tool.

    Thank you for your consideration of our request.

    Sincerely,

    President Wayne L. Niederhauser Speaker Gregory H. Hughes

    You might also like