Report Demography Forum European Union
Report Demography Forum European Union
Report Demography Forum European Union
Table of Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3
Opportunities for young adults ............................................................................ 4
Improving the work-life balance .......................................................................... 5
Enabling people to be active longer ...................................................................... 6
Successful inclusion of second-generation migrants ............................................... 7
Regions in rapid demographic and economic decline and inequalities within regions ... 8
Investing in Europe's demographic future - how the SIP will support the drive towards
extending Europe's demographic dividend ............................................................ 9
Conclusions .....................................................................................................10
May 2013 2
Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion
The Fourth Demography Forum
This report was drafted by the Forum organisers on the basis of the delivered
speeches. Any possible errors or omissions are to be imputed to the Forum
organisers
Introduction
In his welcoming speech, Commissioner Andor underlined our duty to prepare
a longer-term future for ourselves and our children while being conscious of
the need to urgently tackle the short-term problems caused by the crisis. He
highlighted a dilemma whereby cutting jobs to reduce costs and debt was also
reducing revenue and increasing social welfare expenditure. Facing ageing
meant creating an environment where growing old did not necessarily mean
becoming dependent on others. For todays young, it was necessary to bring
education and training more closely into line with the skills needed on the
labour market and to take advantage of free movement on the EU labour
market to match jobs and skills more effectively. Overall, within existing
budget constraints, the Member States need to shift their focus to investing in
human capital, supporting job creation and social cohesion. Francesco Billari
cast the policy debate into the observed long term trends of higher education
levels, especially for women, postponement of access to and exit from labour
market, family-forming and child birth, and the increasingly positive link
between well-being and fertility. Monika Queisser underlined womens
potential in sustaining labour supply and the role of the market place and
public authorities; to remove barriers to women's participation in the labour
market, a whole array of policies should be enacted, in the areas of work-life
reconciliation policies, removing disincentives in tax and benefit systems,
education and labour market, entrepreneurship, gender equality. Marc Frequin
warned against localised initiatives to attract young adults that tend to create
an expensive service excess supply; at local level, there was a need for more
adaptability in measures to develop physical (e.g., multi-functional buildings
that can be reconverted) and human capital to adapt to changing needs; there
were also opportunities to make of the challenge a virtue, as for instance in
converting abandoned areas to energy regions within a necessary strategic
de-investment.
May 2013 3
Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion
The Fourth Demography Forum
Making labour market more adapted to attract more young adults, migrants,
women, as well as the elderly into labour force. At present, the major threat to
European welfare system is not population aging as such, but the inability of labour
markets to tap the unused labour market potential of many underemployed
people.
Reducing income inequalities, which have been on the rise in most countries in
Europe. As more people live on the margins, without decent income, education,
and employment, the reproduction of social disadvantage threatens future human
capital more than the observed low birth rates in many parts of Europe.
Reducing elderly bias in social spending. Recently, Vanhuysse (2013) has shown
that social spending in many countries of Europe is strongly biased towards the
elderly, which risked undermining intergenerational justice and makes young adults
well-being more dependent on the willingness of their families to support them. The
elderly welfare spending bias also implies that government cuts in social spending
in times of austerity fall more heavily on younger generations and, consequently,
may impinge negatively on family formation.
Supporting family formation and homecare for children among those temporary out
of employment. People out of employment often lack resources considered
necessary to start a family. For instance, parental leave benefits are often tied to
previous employment. One way how to support people who are temporarily out of
employment in their decision to have a child, is to establish a system of temporary
home-care allowances, housing subsidies and special loans for parents with small
children.
Pavel Trantina outlined very clearly the economics behind the youth
guarantee as its advantages would not be limited to help young adults a
strong reason in itself -, rather it makes strong economic sense from an
investment viewpoint. There were some 14 million young NEETs in the EU-27;
these cost in excess of 150 billion per year; according to ILO estimates, the
guarantee would cost some 21 billion for the next few years and the youth
guarantee fund itself was endowed with 6 billion per year in the current EU
multi-annual financial framework.
The NEET, that is young people not in employment, education or training, cost
varied widely across Member States; and lower cost were associated with
Member States that had invested early in young people. Investments had to
be planned at national level but following common EU principles.
In Finland, as Matti Mkel explained, there was much satisfaction with their
training guarantee model. Since 2011 it offers those who completed
comprehensive school (to age 16) a placement in education/training,
apprenticeship, youth work or other suitable position; since 2013, it offers
May 2013 4
Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion
The Fourth Demography Forum
Some rebalancing between paid and unpaid work was necessary to allow
improving the work-life balance. Maria Jepsen indicated flexible working
arrangements, accessible quality care services and adequate parental leave
schemes as crucial policy levers. It was also important to consider what kind
of jobs these policies would foster, for instance those available to women who
return from leave. She reported that women in the EU, while faring better
than men in working conditions and working time, are often penalised in terms
of salaries and career opportunities.
According to her, It was important to realise that work-life balance is for both
women and men; that there were issues of consistency between work-life
balance and gender equality, especially on the labour market; that there was a
need for continuity in supporting the access of women to the labour market.
Gender mainstreaming was a crucial policy option that could ensure continuing
support throughout the life course.
Iceland was proud of its world primacy in gender equality, announced Kristin
stgeirsdttir. There were no secret formula, rather a good combination of
friendly policies such as work organisation, including hours, education levels,
leave provisions, child care, promoting an equal share of housework, family
and elderly support and a supportive tax and benefit system. Main changes
occurred between 1960 and 1980, during which women strongly increased
May 2013 5
Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion
The Fourth Demography Forum
their role on the labour market; 1960s policies fostered the dual-earner model
above the male-breadwinner and the provision of migrant labour; this was
built around principles of equal pay for equal work and equal opportunities.
From the 1980s women movements fostered further gender equality reforms,
via services aimed to support work/life reconciliation. Although even in
Iceland, gender equality was still far from perfect, the country had moved
much and close towards an equal society. The progress continues and recently
the government had introduced parental leave that encouraged fathers to take
an almost equal time to mothers; this was the current, most important
challenge, shared by other in the panel.
Policies should focus on life-long learning for adults with lower formal
qualifications.
In Italy, Pietro Checcucci told the audience, there had been a slow change
from replacement policies, aiming to replace older workers with large cohorts
of younger ones, towards blocking (limit early retirement) and development
(older workers and managers jointly improve their employability). Their new
2014-2020 strategy aimed at increasing the Italian manpower by 1.5 million
people, as a result of a loss of workers under age 54, compensated by the
influx of immigrant workers and an increase in participation of those aged 55
and over. Older workers were more present in larger enterprises and there
was a need to focus on their participation in life-long learning. The new
strategy also foresaw incentives for hiring older workers, flexible times and
working arrangements, and other active labour market measures.
Productivity does not necessarily decrease with age. Thomas Zwick recalled
early studies that had introduced the notion of productivity decrease with age.
However, while there are still difficulties in estimating productivity, newer
studies, based on longitudinal data, pointed to a sustained and continuing
productivity into older working ages. In Germany, half of the companies had
introduced measures to accommodate for older workers needs, including
reduced working time, training and ensuring that teams have a mix of younger
May 2013 6
Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion
The Fourth Demography Forum
and older workers. The first two measures had a limited impact because of the
older workers training preferences (less technical, less formal) and used
reduced working time as a stepping stone towards retirement. On the other
hand, mixed-age work teams appeared to be an effective way of motivating
older workers and keeping their productivity high.
As the first generation of migrant was still largely active and the second still
largely in education there was a need for an integrated cross-generational
approach to social investment. In particular, the south-EU migration model,
with a large share of less-well educated, less-well paid, high-activity migrants,
was showing its limits. Ferruccio Pastore highlighted its low-cost but also low-
benefit nature. It was increasingly characterised by native-immigrant
competition on bad jobs markets; cheap access to immigrant labour was a
disincentive for ever more needed entrepreneurial innovation; and a growing
demand for welfare services.
May 2013 7
Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion
The Fourth Demography Forum
Birgit Garbe-Emden illustrated the plight of rural regions in the European East,
from where many young adults were leaving and few returning. Low
employment, high unemployment and low per-capita GDP were inextricably
linked to regional out-migration. These left a legacy of children and other
dependent persons left behind, scarcity of care support, sparse schools with
combined-aged classes. Responses were to be developed also within
partnerships between immigration and emigration regions in the EU. These
should focus on the infrastructure (such as transport and education), as well
as human capital and labour market measures that were tailored to the local
economy.
May 2013 8
Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion
The Fourth Demography Forum
John Bohan highlighted the depth and width of the Social Investment Package.
It was important for Member States to have adequate budget tools. The main
challenge now was its implementation, which would consist of on national
reforms, with the help of structural funds, supported by identifying good
practices and support in exploring innovative solutions. Reorienting exiting
programmes could be sufficient in some cases, although there was also a need
for a Social Investment programme. Linking separate programmes is a way to
build synergies. Social innovation played an important role, including ways of
assessing programme benefits. And we should not forget that we can learn
from other Member States.
Minister Beermann recalled the recent history of his region, Saxony, and how
it had managed to face its demographic challenges through sustained
investment focussing on education and training. While in the early 1990s the
region was characterised by low fertility and high out-migration, now Dresden
had become the city in Germany with highest fertility and young adults were
returning to Saxony. Still, the region was paying the consequences of the
difficult adaptation in the 1990s. Rural regions in Germany and elsewhere
were undergoing rapid ageing and population loss; this undermined cohesion
within the Union. There was a need to preserve social services for those in
need and maintain production; young well-educated people should be
encouraged not to leave and policies could be successful. To bring this forward
the Social Investment Package was a suitable framework.
May 2013 9
Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion
The Fourth Demography Forum
Conclusions
The many Forum participants joined in the debate and highlighted their
concern for demographic change and its relations to several policy areas,
debating problems and solutions.
In the next years we will get to know how successfully the good policies and
practices highlighted during this Forum will have been adopted and
implemented elsewhere, and if building on demographic awareness we will
have moved closer to the Europe 2020 targets of improving skills, raising
labour participation and reducing poverty.
May 2013 10