InBody E Book PDF

T H E P R O F E S S I O N A L’S G U I D E TO
THE INBODY
RESULT SHEET
Everything you need to know to interpret InBody
Results and start offering your clients the insights they
need to improve their health & wellness
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S
INTRODUCTION
3
The InBody Result Sheet
CHAPTER 1
5 Body Composition Analysis and
Body Water
11 CHAPTER 2
Muscle, Fat, and Obesity Risk
CHAPTER 3
24 Segmental Analysis
- Your Magnifying Glass
32 CHAPTER 4
Customizable Outputs
CHAPTER 5
38 Unlocking the Power of the
Result Sheet
48 CONCLUSION
INTRODUCTION
The InBody Result Sheet, if used properly, can be one of the most powerful
tools at your disposal to guide, train, and care for your clients in ways that were never
before possible. However, to unlock the power of the InBody Result Sheet, you need to
become familiar with how it reports information, and even more importantly, what you
can do with it. That’s the point of this ebook.
Packed into the InBody Result Sheet is the health and fitness information that anyone
who deals with the health and wellness of their clients absolutely needs if they want to
be the best professional they can be.
Over the next several pages, you’ll learn exactly how to read and interpret the InBody
Result Sheet. You’ll learn what the terms mean, why they’re valuable, and the strategies
you can use to implement this invaluable data into your business and with your clients.
If, after reading, you have any questions at all, you can reach out to us anytime at info@
inbodyusa.com, and an InBody Specialist will be happy to assist you with anything you’d
like to know.
Now, on to the Result Sheet!
* The information provided in this document is to be used for educational/informational purposes only and does
not constitute medical advice. Only certified medical & health professionals may diagnose patients and provide
such advice.
The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 3

Below is the Result Sheet from our flagship model, the InBody 770. Although not all InBody
models will have all the outputs shown below, understanding this Result Sheet will help you
understand any InBody Result sheet.This ebook will divide up related portions of the Result Sheet
in separate chapters. You can jump to a specific section/chapter by clicking on it on the Result
Sheet below.
[InBody770]
ID Height Age Gender Test Date / Time
John Doe 5ft. 08.4in. 22 Male 08.23.2016 10: 22
Body Composition Analysis
CHAPTER 1
Values Total Body Water Lean Body Mass Weight

Visceral Fat Area
Intracellular Water (lbs) 70.5 VFA (cm )
CHAPTER 4
2
109.6
Extracellular Water (lbs) 39.0 149.9 200
163.3
Dry Lean Mass (lbs) 40.3 150
Body Fat Mass (lbs) 13.4
100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
11.3
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
163.3 20 40 60 80 Age
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
87.5 Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Control
CHAPTER 2
Skeletal Muscle Mass
Body Fat Mass (lbs)

40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0 lbs
13.4
Lean Body Mass + 0.0 lbs
Obesity Analysis (+) means to gain fat/lean (-) means to lose fat/lean
Segmental Fat Analysis

BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
Body Mass Index
(kg/m2) 24.1 Right Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
PBF (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
Percent Body Fat 8.2 Trunk ( 6.0 lbs) 62.1%
Right Leg ( 2.2 lbs) 59.6%
Segmental Lean Analysis
Left Leg ( 2.2 lbs) 59.5%
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Basal Metabolic Rate
Right Arm 9.04 0.368
(%) 124.4 1838 kcal
CHAPTER 3
(lbs)
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%)
8.91 0.368 45.1 lbs
122.5
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk (%)
67.3 0.357 73.1 %
116.0 Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
Right Leg (lbs)
22.51 0.352 RA LA TR RL LL
(%) 111.3 Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.5 18.6
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.6 29.8
Left Leg (lbs)
(%)
22.60 0.355 250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.5 19.6
111.7
Whole Body Phase Angle
ECW/TBW Analysis 7.3˚
RA LA TR RL LL
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8 7.8
ECW/TBW 0.357 Results Interpretation QR Code
Scan the QR Code to see
Body Composition History results interpretation in
164.2
Weight (lbs) 163.0 163.2 163.3 163.5 162.1 162.8 163.3 more detail.
88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance

SMM
(lbs) 86.5 87.5 RA LA TR RL LL
Z (Ω) 1 291.2 295.4 27.4 282.4 274.6
9.0 8.5 8.7 8.0 9.2 8.5 8.3 8.2 5 282.1 286.2 26.6 273.1 266.3
PBF (%)
Percent Body Fat 50 236.3 240.6 21.5 224.2 219.9
250 206.3 210.6 17.1 193.9 189.8
ECW/TBW 0.357 0.362 0.359 0.358 0.362 0.360 0.356 0.357 500 198.4 202.4 15.5 186.9 182.8
1000 193.5 197.3 14.8 181.6 177.6
06.16.16 06.21.16 07.08.16 07.19.16 07.28.16 08.02.16 08.13.16 08.23.16
Recent Total 10:01 10:12 10:27 09:45 09:30 10:56 10:29 10:22
Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR-USA-C7-A-131106
HELPFUL TIP
Be on the lookout for boxes like these. These boxes will highlight practical uses for a section
that will help you understand how to use the data.
You can click on this icon to return to the table of contents at any time

CHAPTER ONE
BODY COMPOSITION
ANALYSIS AND
BODY WATER
BODY COMPOSITION ANALYSIS
In this section, you’ll learn:
· How to understand a body composition breakdown
· How to determine if muscle growth has truly occurred
· How to identify swelling in the body
[InBody770]
At the top of
ID
the result sheet isHeight
your client’s
Age
basicGender
body composition
Test Date / Time
breakdown.
Visceral Fat Area
Intracellular Water (lbs) 70.5 VFA (cm2)
109.6
163.3
100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
11.3
D
epending
Weight on the model(lbs) of InBody
55 70 85
you’re
100
using,
115 130
the
145
breakdown
160 175 190
may205
look a little
163.3 20 40 60 80
different,
SMM
but all models
(lbs)
70 start
80 with
90 the
100 smallest
110 120 units
130 on the
140 150 left
160 and
170 gradually
get into theSkeletal

bigger categories until you get to the total 87.5
Muscle Mass
body weight on the far right. Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Co
Body Fat Mass (lbs)
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0
13.4
Lean Body Mass + 0.0
In this example,
Obesity taken from the InBody 770 Result Sheet, you can see how weight
Analysis (+)is
means to gain fat/lean (-) means to l
broken down into Lean Body Mass and Total Body Water, which is broken into even Segmental Fat Analysis
BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
smaller pieces: Intracellular
Body Mass Index
(kg/m ) Water, Extracellular
2
Water, Dry Lean Mass, and Body
24.1 Right Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
Fat Mass. PBF (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
(%) 124.4 1838 kcal
(lbs)
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%)
8.91 0.368 45.1 lbs
122.5
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk (%)
67.3 0.357 73.1 %
116.0 Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
Right
GuideLeg
22.51 0.352
The Professional’s to the InBody
(%) Result Sheet 111.3 Xc(Ω) 5 6 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.
Left Leg (lbs)
(%)
22.60 0.355 250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.
111.7
C H1 / B O DY C O M P O S I T I O N A N A LY S I S
Starting from the top, you have Intracellular Water and Extracellular Water.
Intracellular Water is the amount of body water held within the body’s cells;
Extracellular Water is the water outside the cells. Added together, these make up
Total Body Water.
[InBody770]
Visceral Fat Area
109.6
163.3
100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
11.3
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
163.3 20 40 60 80
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Skeletal Muscle Mass 87.5 Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Co
B R E A K I N GBody
I T Fat W N(lbs)
D OMass
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0
13.4
Obesity Analysis (+) means to gain fat/lean (-) means to
Both of these sections are useful in their own right, but monitoring Extracellular Water in Segmental Fat Analysis
particular hasBMI
a lot of very pertinent
10.0 uses18.5to health
15.0 22.0 professionals.
25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
(kg/m ) 24.1
2
Body Mass Index Right Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
If you notice PBF
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0
an increase
Percent Body Fat in(%)
ECW, but not ICW, this could be the presence of internal swelling
8.2 Trunk ( 6.0 lbs) 62.1%
and/or inflammation. Right Leg ( 2.2 lbs) 59.6%
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
(%) 124.4 1838 kcal
(lbs)
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%)
8.91 0.368 45.1 lbs
122.5
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk (%)
67.3 0.357 73.1 %
116.0 Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
Right Leg (%)
22.51 0.352
111.3 Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.
Left Leg (lbs)
(%)
22.60 0.355 250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.
111.7
RA LA TR RL
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
Body
The Professional’s GuideComposition History
to the InBody Result Sheet 7
results interpretation in
164.2 163.0 163.2 163.3 163.5 more detail.
Weight (lbs) 162.1 162.8 163.3
88.5 89.2 87.2 88.0 Impedance
Below ICW and ECW is Dry Lean Mass (DLM). This is the weight of the protein
and mineral content in the body. Although this is an often underused section of the
[InBody770]
Result Sheet, it can reveal some very interesting insights.
Visceral Fat Area
109.6
163.3
100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
11.3
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
B R E A K I NWeight
G IT DOWN
(lbs)
163.3 20 40 60 80
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Because muscle is made up of mostly protein, and because87.5 DLM by definition doesn’t Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Con
account forBody
bodyFatwater, (lbs) 40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass
Mass if you see your client’s DLM increase, it’s very likely that they have - 0.0 lb
13.4
truly gained muscle. Lean Body Mass + 0.0 lb
Obesity Analysis (+) means to gain fat/lean (-) means to los

BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
Body Mass Index
(kg/m2) 24.1 Right Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
PBF (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
Below DLM is Body Fat Mass. This reports all of the body fat in the [InBody770]
person
ECW/TBW testing,
including both
Right the
Arm surface level (subcutaneous) and internal (visceral) fat.
ID (lbs) Height Age Gender Test Date / Time 0.368
9.04
(%) 124.4 1838 kcal
John Doe 55
5ft.7008.4in.
85
22
100 115
Male
130 145
08.23.2016
160 175
10: 22 Leg Lean Mass
(lbs)
Left Arm 8.91 0.368 45.1 lbs
Body Composition Analysis (%) 122.5
70 80 90 100 110 TBW/LBM
(lbs) Values Total Body Water120 Lean
130
Body140Mass150 Weight
Trunk (%)
67.3 0.357 73.1 %
Visceral Fat Area
Intracellular Water (lbs) 70.5 116.0 VFA
Reactance
(cm )
2
70 80 90 100
109.6
110 120 130 140 150
Right Leg Water (lbs) 39.0 22.51 0.352 200 RA LA TR RL
Extracellular (lbs)
(%) 111.3 149.9 Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.5
163.3 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.6
Dry
LeftLean
Leg Mass (lbs)
70
40.3
80 90 100 110 120
22.60
130 140 150
0.355 150250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.5
(%) 111.7
Body Fat Mass (lbs) 13.4 Whole Body Phase Angle
100 7.3˚
ECW/TBW Analysis
Muscle-Fat Analysis RA LA TR RL
ø50
( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
ECW/TBW
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450
11.3
Weight (lbs)
55 70 0.357
85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Results Interpretation QR Code
163.3 20 40 60 80
Body
SMM Composition
(lbs) History 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
164.2 163.0 163.2 163.3 163.5 87.5 Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Con
163.3 more detail.
Weight 162.1400 162.8
(lbs)
Body Fat Mass (lbs)
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0 lb
13.4
88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Lean Body Mass
Impedance + 0.0 lb
SMM
Obesity
The Professional’s Guide
Skeletal toAnalysis
(lbs)
the InBody
Muscle Mass Result Sheet 86.5 87.5 (+) means to gain fat/lean (-) means to los
8 RA LA TR RL
Z (Ω) 1 291.2 295.4 27.4 282.4
9.0 15.0 8.518.5 8.7 9.2 8.5 8.3 Segmental
5 Fat Analysis
282.1 286.2 26.6 273.1
PBF
BMI (%) 10.0 22.0 25.08.030.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 8.2
55.0
50 236.3 240.6 21.5 224.2
(kg/m ) 24.1
2
Percent Body Fat
250 206.3 210.6 17.1 193.9
0.0 5.00.362
10.0 0.359
15.0 20.0 25.0 0.362
30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0
By adding ICW, ECW, and DLM together, you get the total Lean Body Mass (LBM),
shown in the second column from the right. LBM is the weight of everything in the
body that is not body fat. This includes muscle, water, bones, organs - everything
[InBody770]
that is not Body Fat.
Visceral Fat Area
109.6
163.3
100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
11.3
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
Most of the time, increases in LBM reflect increases 163.3 in muscle (which you can 20 40 60 80
SMM
also see as an 70 80 90 100 110 120
increase in DLM), and is considered a positive 130 140 150 160 170
87.5 improvement in body
(lbs)
Skeletal Muscle Mass Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Co
composition. However,
Body Fat Mass
people
(lbs) 40 who
60 do
80 not
100maintain
160 220 normal
280 340body
400 water
460 ratios
520 may
Body Fat Mass - 0.0
13.4
have increased LBM due to swelling caused by certain health conditions. Lean Body Mass + 0.0
Obesity Analysis (+) means to gain fat/lean (-) means to l

BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
(kg/m ) 24.1
2
PBF (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
E X T R A SRight
F O RArm
T H I S (%) 9.04 B LO G
S E C T I O N O N T H E I N B O DY 0.368
124.4 1838 kcal
55
(lbs) The Beginner’s Guide
70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Leg Lean Mass
· Body Composition
Left Arm 101:
(%)
8.91 0.368
Read
45.1 lbs
122.5
· Unpacking Body Composition
(lbs)
70 Lingo
80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 Read TBW/LBM
Trunk 67.3 0.357 73.1 %
· Your Body and You: A Guide To Body Water
(%)
116.0 Read
Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
Right Leg (%)
22.51 0.352
111.3 Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.
Left Leg (lbs)
(%)
22.60 0.355 250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.
111.7
RA LA TR RL
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
164.2 163.0 163.2 163.3 163.5 more detail.
Weight (lbs) 162.1 162.8 163.3
88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance
SMM
(lbs) 86.5 87.5 RA LA TR RL
Z (Ω) 1 291.2 295.4 27.4 282.
9.0 8.5 8.7 8.0 9.2 8.5 8.3 8.2 5 282.1 286.2 26.6 273.
PBF (%)
Extracellular Water
Dry Lean Mass
Body Fat Mass
Muscle-Fat Analysis
Weight
SMM
Body Fat Mass
ECW/TBW ANALYSIS
Obesity Analysis
BMI
Body Mass Index
PBF In this section, you’ll learn:

Percent Body Fat
· How
Segmental Lean to recognize a water imbalance
Analysis
ECW/TBW
Right Arm
Left Arm
T he ECW/TBW Analysis compares the ratio of ECW to TBW. Most healthy

peopleTrunk
will have an average ratio of around 0.380, with the acceptable range
being between 0.360 – 0.390. Anything beyond 0.390 may indicate swelling or
Right Leg
excess ECW.
Left Leg
ECW/TBW Analysis
ECW/TBW
Body Composition History

Weightfluctuations in your client’s ECW/TBW - that’s normal. This output
You’ll see minor
is primarilySMM
used to give context to another section – the Segmental Lean Analysis.
PBF
Percent Body Fat
BREAKING IT DOWN
ECW/TBW
This graph lets you quickly understand if your client has some sort of swelling in his or her
body, either in a specific area (like in the case of an injury) or present throughout the entire
body (often seen in obese individuals).
You can also use this to give context to LBM. High LBM and a high ECW/TBW ratio usually
indicate the presence of excess body water – not just muscle.

CHAPTER TWO
MUSCLE, FAT,
AND OBESITY RISK
MUSCLE-FAT ANALYSIS [InBody770]
· How to quickly identify common body compositions
· How to tell if someone is below, above, or average in weight, Visceral Fat Area
muscle,109.6
and fat
163.3
100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
11.3
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
163.3 20 40 60 80
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Body Fat Mass (lbs) 40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0
13.4
F
BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
or many Body
people,
Mass Index
(kg/m2) 24.1 is one of their favorite sections.
this section of the Result Sheet Right Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
PBF (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
Why? Because it allows
Segmental youAnalysis
Lean to categorize different body types more easily. This Right Leg ( 2.2 lbs) 59.6%
section makes it simple for you to give your clients a good, general ideaECW/TBW
about their
current overall
Rightbody
Arm composition and what changes
(lbs) they need to make.0.368
9.04
(%) 124.4 1838 kcal
(lbs)
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%)
8.91 0.368 45.1 lbs
122.5
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk (%)
67.3 0.357 73.1 %
116.0 Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
Right Leg (%)
22.51 0.352
111.3 Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.
Left Leg (lbs)
(%)
22.60 0.355 250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.
111.7
RA LA TR RL
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
164.2
88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance

SMM
The Professional’s Guide
Skeletal toMass
Muscle
(lbs) Result Sheet
the InBody 86.5 87.5 12 RA LA TR RL
Z (Ω) 1 291.2 295.4 27.4 282.
9.0 8.5 8.7 8.0 9.2 8.5 8.3 8.2 5 282.1 286.2 26.6 273.
PBF (%)
Percent Body Fat 50 236.3 240.6 21.5 224.
250 206.3 210.6 17.1 193.
0.362 0.359 0.362
C H2 / M U S C L E-FAT A N A LY S I S [InBody770]
Visceral Fat Area
109.6
39.0
Extracellular Water (lbs) 149.9 200
163.3
H O W TO R E Lean
Dry AD T H E (lbs)
Mass N U M B40.3
E R S AT T H E TO P: 150
100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
11.3
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
163.3 20 40 60 80
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Skeletal Muscle Mass 87.5 Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Con
Body Fat Mass (lbs)
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0 l
13.4
Lean Body Mass + 0.0 l

BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
(kg/m ) 24.1
2
The 100% Body

mark, as well as all the percentage marks,
Mass Index
are all based on what is Right Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
PBF 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
consideredPercent
normal (%)
Body Fat for an individual of the specific height they give when they Trunk
8.2 ( 6.0 lbs) 62.1%
tested. The markingsLean
Segmental above the bar graphs allow you to compare your client to Right Leg
Analysis ( 2.2 lbs) 59.6%
others of the same height and gender. ECW/TBW
(lbs)
(%) 124.4 1838 kcal
While the healthy range varies 55 as
70 shown
85 above,
100 115 100%
130 145designates
160 175 the average for
Leg Lean Mass
(lbs)
Left Arm 8.91 0.368
the weight bar extended to 130%,
individuals with the same height and gender. So, if122.5
(%) 45.1 lbs
TBW/LBM
(lbs) person who you are testing is 30% above average.
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
this wouldTrunk
mean that the 67.3 0.357 73.1 %
(%)
116.0 Reactance
70 80 90 100 130 110
140 150 120
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
Similarly, ifRight
yourLeg
client’s(%)weight 22.51
bar extended to111.3 0.352
70%, this would mean that yourXc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.5
50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.6
client has 30% less mass
Left Leg (lbs)than is considered normal for their height.
70 80 90 100 110 120 130
22.60
140 150
0.355 250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.5
(%) 111.7
RA LA TR RL
BREAKING IT DOWN 0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
This graph Body Composition
lets you History
show your client how their body composition compares against people of
the same height and gender. 164.2
88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance

SMM
Z (Ω) 1 291.2 295.4 27.4 282.4
9.0 8.7 9.2 8.5 8.3
PBF (%) 8.5 8.0 8.2 5 282.1 286.2 26.6 273.1
Percent Body Fat 50 236.3 240.6 21.5 224.2
250 206.3 210.6 17.1 193.9
ECW/TBW 0.357 0.362 0.359 0.358 0.362 0.360 0.356 0.357 500 198.4 202.4 15.5 186.9
1000 193.5 197.3 14.8 181.6
06.16.16 06.21.16 07.08.16 07.19.16 07.28.16 08.02.16 08.13.16 08.23.16
Recent Total 10:01 10:12 10:27 09:45 09:30 10:56 10:29 10:22
Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR-U

C H2 / M U S C L E-FAT A N A LY S I S [InBody770]
Visceral Fat Area
109.6
39.0
163.3
T H E M U SDry
C LLean
E-FAT A N A
Mass (lbs) LY S I
40.3S H A S T H R E E C O M P O N E N T S: 150
100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
11.3
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
163.3 20 40 60 80
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Body Fat Mass (lbs)
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0 l
13.4

W E I G H T BMI (kg/m )
2
10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0
24.1
30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
Body Mass Index Right Arm
Total BodyPBFWeight (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
S K E L E TASegmental
L M U S C LLean
E M AAnalysis
S S (S M M) Left Leg ( 2.2 lbs) 59.5%
ECW/TBW
The total weight of your client’s
55 Skeletal
70 85 Muscle.
100 115 These
130 145 are
160 the
175muscles that can be Metabolic Rate
Basal
(lbs)
Right Arm
grown and developed through exercise. Unlike LBM, 9.04 0.368
(%) 124.4 which includes everything that 1838 kcal
Leg Lean Mass
isn’t body fat, you
Left Arm can view
(lbs) an
55
increase
70 85
in SMM
100 115
as actual
130
8.91
145
muscle
160 175
gain. 0.368
(%) 122.5 45.1 lbs
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
B O DY FAT Trunk
MASS (%)
67.3 0.357 73.1 %
116.0 Reactance
This is howRight
muchLegbody(lbs)
fat your client has, and combines
70 80 90 100 110 120
22.51
130
both the surface
140 150
0.352level and RA LA TR RL
(%) 111.3 Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.5
internal fat. 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.6
Left Leg (lbs)
(%)
22.60 0.355 250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.5
111.7
The Muscle-Fat
ECW/TBWAnalysis also tells you whether your client has a healthy balance of
Analysis 7.3˚
SMM and Body Fat Mass in respect to his or her weight. RA LA TR RL
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
BREAKING IT DOWN Scan the QR Code to see
164.2
The Muscle-Fat Analysis graph allows you to get a rough understanding of your client’s
overall bodySMMcomposition in one 88.5 89.2
quick glance. By 87.2
looking 88.0
at the lengths bar and Impedance
(lbs)
87.1 87.1 86.5each
of 87.5 how
RA LA TR RL
they compare to each other, you can better understand how to help your client reach their
Z (Ω) 1 291.2 295.4 27.4 282.4
goals. 9.0 8.5 8.7 8.0 9.2 8.5 8.3 8.2 5 282.1 286.2 26.6 273.1
PBF (%)
Percent Body Fat 50 236.3 240.6 21.5 224.2
250 206.3 210.6 17.1 193.9
0.357 0.362 0.359 0.358 0.362 0.360
0.356 0.357
500 198.4 202.4 15.5 186.9
ECW/TBW 1000 193.5 197.3 14.8 181.6
06.16.16 06.21.16 07.08.16 07.19.16 07.28.16 08.02.16 08.13.16 08.23.16
Recent Total 10:01 10:12 10:27 09:45 09:30 10:56 10:29 10:22
Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR-U

C H2 / M U S C L E-FAT A N A LY S I S
T H E B A S I C B O DY T Y P E S: “C-S H A P E”
[InBody770]
The three Jane
valuesDoepresented in5ft.05.0in.
the Muscle-Fat31 Analysis
Female are arranged
01.28.2015 07 in
: 13such a way
as to makeBody
it simple and easyAnalysis
Composition to make general observations about your client’s body
composition. Values Total Body Water Lean Body Mass Weight
Visceral Fat Area
64.2
You do thisExtracellular
by forming one of24.3
Water (lbs) the three “shapes” by connecting
88.0 the endpoints of200
the
Weight, SMM, and Body (lbs)Fat Mass bars. 135.3
Dry Lean Mass 23.8 150
47.4 100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
C
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
135.3 20 40 60 80
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Body Fat Mass (lbs)
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
47.4
Lean Body Mass + 9.3 lb

BMI (kg/m )
10.0 15.0 18.5 21.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
22.5for SMM than for weight and Body
2
Body Mass Index Right Arm ( 3.3 lbs) 15
A C-shaped individual has a shorter bar length
PBF 8.0 13.0 18.0 23.0 28.0 33.0 38.0 43.0 48.0 53.0 58.0 Left Arm ( 3.3 lbs) 15
Fat Mass. Although
Percent Body Fat this(%)is characteristic of someone who 35.0 is overweight or obese,
Trunk ( 24.0 lbs)
you may see this shape in someone ( 7.3 lbs)
Segmental Lean Analysis who is normal or underweight, too. Right Leg 132.
Left Leg ( 7.1 lbs) 132
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
(%) 88.6 1231 kcal
(lbs)
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%)
4.03 0.374 26.9 lbs
85.6
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
B R E A K I NTrunk
G IT DOWN
(%)
39.6 0.377 73.0 %
92.7 Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
Right Leg (%)
13.36 0.374
89.6 Xc(Ω) 5 21.1 20.9 1.9 20.8
You would want to counsel a client 70
with
80
a
90
Muscle-Fat
100 110
Analysis
120 130
graph
140 150
that looks like this to 50 37.0 36.9 3.2 37.5
reduce their Body
Left (lbs)
Leg Fat Mass (which would also 0.377
13.49lower their Weight) while improving their 250 32.3 32.2 3.4 26.4
(%) 90.5
Skeletal Muscle Mass. Helping this person improve to an I-Shape, and eventually a D-Shape, Whole Body Phase Angle
is the goal. ECW/TBW Analysis 5.4˚
RA LA TR RL
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 4.7 4.5 7.0 6.2
135.4 134.1 134.2 135.4 136.7 135.3 135.0 135.3 more detail.
Weight (lbs)
47.1 47.8 48.2 47.9 Impedance

SMM (lbs) 47.0 46.7 46.5 47.6
RA LA TR RL
Z (Ω) 1 513.6 530.2 31.0 407.2
36.2
The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 36.0 34.3 35.0 5 15503.3
PBF (%) 34.7 32.5 34.2 33.9 521.9 30.0 397.3
Percent Body Fat 50 452.0 470.2 26.3 346.4
250 411.5 429.7 22.4 313.2
0.376 0.378 0.376 0.374 0.376 0.376 0.378 0.376 500 396.7 414.8 20.0 305.0
ECW/TBW 1000 384.3 402.2 17.8 299.4
T H E B A S I C B O DY T Y P E S: “I-S H A P E”
John Doe 6ft. 00.0in. 26 Male 11.20.2015 07 : 45

An I-shaped individual has a “balanced” body composition, meaning their Weight,
Skeletal Muscle Mass, and Body Fat Mass bars roughly form a straight line.
57.1
Although people with this body composition93.3
are often127.4
at a healthy weight or body
36.2
fat percentage, they can still have health risks if they have too much body fat.
194.2
34.2
66.8
56.7
I
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
171.7 60 80
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
80.7 ody Mass Con
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
4.6
29.8
0.0
10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
23.3 1.5 98.9%
BREAKING IT DOWN 1.3 94.9%
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0
17.3 15.4 15
4.6 180.
If you’re working with a client that has an I-shaped body composition, you should find out
4.4 107.6
from them what their overall health goals are before making recommendations.
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175
7.74 0.370 1761
98.6
Typically, I-shaped people don’t have body compositions that put them at health risks, and so
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175
they are in a good position to focus on building 7.89
muscle to gain strength and size,
0.371or lose body
fat in order to gain improve overall leanness. 100.7
46.0
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
61.7 0.372 73.2
98.6
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
23.15 0.374
106.2 18.0 16.2 2.2 13.5
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 32.9 31.5 3.9 27.0
22.84 0.375 23.0 23.4 3.2 20.0
104.8
6.4
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 6.1 6.0 9.7 6.4
0.373
168.4 169.7 170.4 171.7

162.9 164.3 166.5 167.1
78.3 78.6 79.2 79.9 80.4 80.7
76.5 77.2
363.6 351.0 29.3 282.4
16.8 17.1 16.9 17.1 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 355.0 343.6 28.3 276.2
The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 16309.4 301.5 23.4 242.1
275.1 268.0 19.0 216.3
0.373 0.372 0.374 0.373 0.372 0.374 0.370 0.373 264.6 257.4 17.3 210.4
257.3 250.7 15.6 206.5
08.16.15 08.27.15 09.02.15 09.16.15 09.24.15 10.01.15 10.15.15 11.20.15
T H E B A SBody
I C B OComposition
DY T Y P E S:Analysis
“D-S H A P E”
Intracellular Water
A D-shaped person has a longer SMM bar than both their weight and body fat bars.
Extracellular Water
This is indicative of an “athletic” body type and is considered to be the ideal body
Dry Lean Mass
composition shape.
Body Fat Mass
Muscle-Fat Analysis
D
Weight
SMM
Body Fat Mass
Obesity Analysis
If you are working
BMI
with a client who has this type of body composition, they likely
already have specific fitness goals in mind, and your job will be to help them reach
Body Mass Index
PBF
them. Percent Body Fat

BREAKING IT DOWN ECW/TBW
Right Arm
Your client may want to improve their strength and size. In that case, you would want to
Left Arm
monitor their SMM bar and Body Fat Mass bars to make sure that SMM increases without a
significant increase in Body Fat Mass.
Trunk
Others mayRight
wantLegto work on their leanness and lose body fat. For a client with this goal, loss
of Body Fat Mass should be monitored while taking care to mitigate loss of SMM. If SMM
losses become
Left too
Leg great, make adjustments.
ECW/TBW Analysis
E X T R A SECW/TBW
F O R T H I S S E C T I O N O N T H E I N B O DY B LO G
Body Lean
· Why Building Composition History For Everyone (yes even you)
Mass Is Important Read
· 5 Things You Didn’t Know About Muscle and Fat
Weight Read
SMM
PBF
Percent Body Fat
ECW/TBW

[InBody770]
OBESITY ANALYSIS
Visceral Fat Area
109.6
163.3
In this section, you’ll learn: 100
· How
Muscle-Fat to assess your client’s body fat percentage
Analysis
50
· If your client’s body weight and BMI hides their health risks 11.3
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs) from excess163.3
body fat
20 40 60 80
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Body Fat Mass (lbs)
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0
13.4

BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
(kg/m ) 24.1
2
PBF (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
1838 kcal
T
(%) 124.4
he Obesity Analysis includes
(lbs)
55 70 the85signature
100 115 metric
130 of any
145 160 body
175 composition Leg Lean
Mass
Left Arm 8.91 0.368 45.1 lbs
analysis: Percent Body Fat (PBF).
(%) 122.5
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk (%)
67.3 0.357 73.1 %
116.0
It’s a deceptively simple(lbs)
metric
70 – 80a division
90 100 of body
110 120fat 130 total weight – butReactance
mass140by 150 it
Right Leg 22.51 0.352 RA LA TR RL
is a much better indicator of the risk of obesity than
(%) 111.3BMI, which is one of the major Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.
reasons BMI is Leg
Left still included
(lbs) in the analysis – to highlight
22.60 its flaws by comparing
0.355 it to250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.
(%) 111.7
PBF. Whole Body Phase Angle
RA LA TR RL
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
164.2 163.0 163.2 163.3 163.5 more detail.
Weight (lbs) 162.1 162.8 163.3
88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance
SMM
Z (Ω) 1 291.2 295.4 27.4 282.
9.0 8.5 8.7 8.0 9.2 8.5 8.3 8.2 5 282.1 286.2 26.6 273.
PBF (%)
Percent Body Fat 50 236.3 240.6 21.5 224.
250 206.3 210.6 17.1 193.
0.362 0.359 0.358 0.362 0.360
ECW/TBW 0.357 0.356 0.357
500 198.4 202.4 15.5 186.
1000 193.5 197.3 14.8 181.
06.16.16 06.21.16 07.08.16 07.19.16 07.28.16 08.02.16 08.13.16 08.23.16
Recent Total 10:01 10:12 10:27 09:45 09:30 10:56 10:29 10:22
Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR

Visceral Fat Area
64.2
Extracellular Water (lbs) C H2 / O B E S I T Y A N A LY S I88.0
24.3 S 200
135.3
47.4 100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
135.3 20 40 60 80
TSMM
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
W H AT’S HE DIFFER E N C E B E T W47.6
(lbs)
Skeletal Muscle Mass E E N B M I A N D P B F? Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Con
Body Fat Mass (lbs)
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
47.4
Lean Body Mass + 9.3 lb

BMI (kg/m )
10.0 15.0 18.5 21.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
22.5
2
Body Mass Index Right Arm ( 3.3 lbs) 15
PBF (%)
8.0 13.0 18.0 23.0 28.0 33.0 38.0 43.0 48.0 53.0 58.0 Left Arm ( 3.3 lbs) 15
Percent Body Fat 35.0 Trunk ( 24.0 lbs)
Right Leg ( 7.3 lbs) 132
Left Leg ( 7.1 lbs) 132
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
On the InBody Result Sheet,
(%) you’ll see a88.6 1231 kcal
set of ranges for BMI and PBF. 18.5 –
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Leg Lean Mass
24.99 kg/mLeftisArm
2
the normal
(lbs) range according 4.03 to the World Health Organization.
0.374 This
(%) 85.6 26.9 lbs
normal range is presented
(lbs)
on
70 the
80 Result
90 Sheet,
100 110 although
120 130 the
140 InBody
150 device can be
TBW/LBM
Trunk 39.6 0.377 73.0 %
programmed to use a different
(%) range. 92.7 Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
Right Leg (%)
13.36 0.374
89.6 Xc(Ω) 5
21.1 20.9 1.9 20.8
For PBF, the ranges differ for
70 men
80 and
90 women,
100 110 as120
women
130 tend150to carry more body fat
140 37.0 36.9 3.2
50 37.5
Left Leg (lbs) 13.49 0.377 250
32.3 32.2 3.4 26.4
than men due to their reproductive
(%) system
90.5 as well as genetics. The example above is
a graph that represents
ECW/TBW a female individual, and the normal range for females is set
Analysis 5.4˚
at 18-28%, with the average being 23%. RA LA TR RL
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 4.7 4.5 7.0 6.2
135.4 134.1 134.2 135.4 136.7 135.3 135.0 135.3 more detail.
Weight (lbs)
BREAKING IT DOWN
47.1 47.8 48.2 47.9 Impedance
SMM (lbs) 47.0 46.7 46.5 47.6
RA LA TR RL
Z (Ω)
You can show your client their body 36.2 fat percentage36.0
to help their health 15
them understand 35.0
34.3
513.6 530.2 31.0 407.2
PBF (%) 34.7 32.5 34.2 33.9 503.3 521.9 30.0 397.3
and fitness Percent
better. Body FatBMI should not be used. According the WHO, BMI is a population-level 50 452.0 470.2 26.3 346.4
250 411.5 429.7 22.4 313.2
measure of obesity, and a rough guide
0.376 for individuals.
0.378 0.376 0.376 0.376 0.378 0.376 500 396.7 414.8 20.0 305.0
ECW/TBW 0.374
1000 384.3 402.2 17.8 299.4
Recent Total 11.12.15 11.25.15 12.02.15 12.16.15 12.25.15 01.02.15 01.15.15 01.28.15
07:13 07:15 07:05 07:01 06:58 06:45 07:11 07:13
Copyright © 1996~ by InBody Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. BR-U

John Doe 5ft. 08.4in. 22 Male 08.23.2016 10:22
Visceral Fat Area
Intracellular Water (lbs) C70.5
H2 / O B E S I T Y A N A LY S I S VFA (cm2)
109.6
163.3
Dry Lean Mass (lbs) 40.3 [InBody770]
150
ID
Body Fat Mass (lbs) Height
13.4 Age Gender Test Date / Time
Jane Doe 5ft. 07.0in. 22 Female 12.05.2015 12 :45 100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
Body Composition Analysis 50
Values Total
11.3
100 Body
115Water130 Lean
145Body160
Mass 175 Weight205
T H E H E A LT H Y R A N(lbs)
Weight GE
(lbs)
55 70 85 190
Visceral Fat Area
Intracellular Water 57.1 163.3 VFA (cm2) 20 40 60 80
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 93.3
110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Extracellular Water (lbs)
Skeletal Muscle Mass 36.2 87.5
127.4 200 Fat - Lean Body Mass Con
Body
For men, the healthy
Massrange
(lbs) is 34.2
between 10-20%
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 194.2
460 520
Body - 0.0 l
Body
Dry Fat Mass
Lean (lbs)
13.4 150 Fat Mass
134.8
Body Fat Mass
Obesity (lbs)
Analysis 66.8 (+) means to gain fat/lean (-) means to lo
100
Muscle-Fat Analysis Segmental Fat Analysis
BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 50
Body Mass Index
(kg/m2) 24.1 Right Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight
PBF (lbs) 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
(%) 194.2 20( 6.040
Percent Body Fat 8.2 Trunk lbs) 6062.1%80
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Segmental
Skeletal Muscle Mass Lean Analysis 69.9 Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Con
ECW/TBW
18-28% - 28.7 lb
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
For women,
BodytheFathealthy
Mass range
(lbs) is70between 14566.8
Body Fat Mass
55
(lbs)
85 100 115 130 160 175 Basal Metabolic
Lean Body Mass Rate + 0.0 lb
Obesity Analysis
(%) 124.4 1838 kcal
(+) means to gain fat/lean (-) means to los
(lbs)
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm 8.91 0.368 Segmental Fat Analysis
BMI (%) 10.0 15.0 18.5 21.0 25.0 122.5 35.0
30.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 45.1 lbs
Body Mass Index
(kg/m2)
70 80 90 100 110 120 30.4
130 140 150 TBW/LBM
Right Arm ( 5.1 lbs)
(lbs)
Trunk
PBF (%) 8.0 13.0 18.0 23.0 28.0 33.067.338.0 43.0 48.0 53.0 0.357
58.0 Left Arm ( 5.173.1
lbs) %
(%) 116.0
Percent Body Fat
70 80 90 100 110 120
34.3
130 140 150
Reactance ( 33.1 lbs)
Trunk
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
Right Leg 22.51 0.352 Right Leg ( 10.4 lbs) 1
Segmental Lean Analysis (%) 111.3 Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.5
Left Leg
50 10.4 lbs
(27.6 ) 3.5
27.7 30.61
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 ECW/TBW
If you’d likeLeft
moreLeg information
(%) 40 on
(lbs)
60 how
80 InBody
100 120sets
22.60160PBF
140the 180ranges
200
0.355and Basal
for men 250 19.8 18.4 1.6
Metabolic Rate 19.5
Right Arm
(lbs) 111.7
6.75 0.379 Whole Body Phase Angle
women, send (%)
an email Analysis
to [email protected]. 120.5 1619 kcal
ECW/TBW 40 60 80 100 120 140
7.3˚160 180 200 Leg Lean Mass
(lbs)
Left Arm (%)
6.59 0.379 39.9 lbs RA LA TR RL
117.7 ø( ˚) 50
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450
TBW/LBM 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
ECW/TBW (lbs)
70 80 90
0.357
100 110 120 130 140 150
Trunk (%)
54.0 0.390 73.2 %QR Code
Results Interpretation
107.6 Reactance
Body Composition
Right Leg (lbs)
70
History
80 90 100 110
0.390
120 130
19.97
140 150
RA LA
results interpretation in TR RL
(%) 5 14.4 14.1 1.2 8.7
S E C164.2
113.5 Xc(Ω)detail.
E X T R A S Weight
F O R T H I S (lbs) T I O 80163.0
N O N T163.2
H E I N163.3
B O DY163.5
B LO G 150 162.8
163.3 more
70 90 100 110 120 130 162.1
140 50 27.3 26.9 2.8 18.4
Left Leg (lbs) 20.02 0.392 250 20.4 20.5 2.8 14.6
88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2
(%) 113.7 88.0 Impedance
· Why You SMM Need To Know (lbs) Your Body Fat Percentage 87.1 86.5 87.5 Read Whole Body Phase Angle
RA LA TR RL
˚
· BMI’s FatECW/TBW Analysis 291.2 5.4
Secret Z (Ω) 1 295.4 27.4 282.4
9.0 8.7 9.2 8.5 8.3
Read
PBF (%) 8.5 8.00.400 8.2 5 RA
282.1 LA286.2 TR RL
26.6 273.1
Percent Body Fat 0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 50
ø( ˚) 50 236.3
5.1 4.9 240.6 9.6
21.5 224.2
5.4
ECW/TBW 250 206.3 210.6 17.1 193.9
ECW/TBW 0.357 0.362 0.359 0.358
0.3890.362 0.360
0.356 0.357
500 Interpretation
Results 198.4 202.4QR Code
15.5 186.9
Scan 1000 193.5 to197.3
the QR Code see 14.8 181.6
06.16.16 06.21.16 07.08.16 07.19.16 07.28.16 08.02.16 08.13.16 08.23.16 results interpretation in
Recent Total 10:01 10:27 10:12
09:45 09:30 10:56 10:29 10:22
195.0 194.2 194.1 194.0 194.1 194.2 more detail.
Weight (lbs) 192.9 193.7 Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR-U
71.2 70.3 70.5 Impedance

SMM (lbs) 69.8 70.1 69.8 70.2 69.9
RA LA TR RL
Z (Ω) 1 350.6 358.2 20.1 222.2
34.7 34.5 34.3 34.8 34.5 5 343.3 351.9 19.6 216.3
PBF (%) 34.1 34.2 34.3
Percent Body Fat 50 307.0 315.2 17.0 195.4
250 278.5 287.7 14.0 178.2
0.391 0.389 0.390 0.389 500 268.7
ECW/TBW 0.387 0.385 0.385 0.387 277.8 12.7 175.0
1000 260.3 268.2 11.2 173.4
10.17.15 10.26.15 11.02.15 11.15.15 11.20.15 11.28.15 12.01.15 12.05.15
Recent Total 11:15 11:30 12:46 12:52 12:23 12:37 12:20 12:45
Copyright © 1996~ by InBody Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. BR-U

163.3 20 40 60 80
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Body Fat Mass (lbs)
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0
13.4

BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
Body Mass Index
(kg/m2) 24.1 Right Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
PBF (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
BODY COMPOSITION HISTORY

ECW/TBW
(lbs)
(%) 124.4 1838 kcal
(lbs)
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%)
8.91 0.368 45.1 lbs
122.5
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk In this section, you’ll
(%)
67.3
learn: 0.357 73.1 %
116.0 Reactance
Right Leg
· How
(lbs) to recognize trends in body composition
70 80 90 100 110 120
22.51
130 140 150
0.352 RA LA TR RL
(%) 111.3 Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.
· How to identify positive
70 80
or
90
negative
100 110
changes
120 130
in body
140 150
composition 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.
Left Leg (lbs)
(%) with respect to weight 22.60 0.355 250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.
111.7
RA LA TR RL
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
164.2 163.0 163.2 163.3 163.5 more detail.
Weight (lbs) 162.1 162.8 163.3
88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance
SMM
Z (Ω) 1 291.2 295.4 27.4 282.
9.0 8.5 8.7 8.0 9.2 8.5 8.3 8.2 5 282.1 286.2 26.6 273.
PBF (%)
Percent Body Fat 50 236.3 240.6 21.5 224.
250 206.3 210.6 17.1 193.
ECW/TBW 0.357 0.362 0.359 0.358 0.362 0.360 0.356 0.357 500 198.4 202.4 15.5 186.
1000 193.5 197.3 14.8 181.
06.16.16 06.21.16 07.08.16 07.19.16 07.28.16 08.02.16 08.13.16 08.23.16
Recent Total 10:01 10:12 10:27 09:45 09:30 10:56 10:29 10:22
A t the bottom of the Result Sheet is the Body Composition History, which
automatically tracks some of the most important body composition metrics.
This makes it really easy to identify trends over time.
Take, for example, the results above. These results represent an athletic, D-shaped
individual whose goal was to gain muscle and lose body fat.

ECW/TBW
Right Arm
Left Arm C H2 / B O DY C O M P O S I T I O N H I S TO R Y
Trunk
Right Leg
Left Leg
T R AC K I NECW/TBW
G P O S I T I VAnalysis
E CHANGE
ECW/TBW

Weight
SMM
PBF
Percent Body Fat
ECW/TBW
As you can see, the program this individual adopted has clearly been successful. In a
little over two months, his weight has only increased 2 pounds, yet has gained almost
8 pounds of muscle and dropped his percentage body fat by 2.6%. By any measure,
this would be an indication of great success!
BREAKING IT DOWN
If your client’s results look like the above example, the current exercise and/or diet regimen
they’ve adopted would appear to be effective. Little modifications to diet or exercise are
likely needed, but you should continue to monitor trends carefully.

BMI
Body Mass Index
(kg/m2) 25.9 Right Arm ( 2.0 lbs) 147
PBF (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 2.0 lbs) 146
Percent Body Fat 20.0 Trunk ( 19.0 lbs)
Right Leg ( 5.3 lbs) 136
Segmental Lean
C H2Analysis
/ B O DY C O M P O S I T I O N H I S TO R Y Left Leg ( 5.5 lbs) 136
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
(%) 102.1 1785 kcal
(lbs)
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%)
7.83 0.380 45.0 lbs
102.4
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk (%)
60.2 0.391 73.4 %
98.9 Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
T R AC K I NRight
G N ELeg
G AT I V(%)
E CHANGE 22.25 0.392
104.7 Xc(Ω) 5 14.8 12.5 2.3 8.1
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 24.3 24.3 3.0 17.8
Left Leg (lbs)
(%)
22.75 0.396 250 19.4 19.8 2.8 15.0
107.1
The Body Composition History also makes it easy to raise red flags when negative 5.2˚
ECW/TBW Analysis
changes in body composition occur, especially when they are disguised by a RA LA TR RL
ø( ˚) 50 5.0 5.0 10.6 5.1
seemingly ECW/TBW
“positive” change0.320of reduced
0.340 0.360
body
0.380
weight.
0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450
0.391 Results Interpretation QR Code

181.5 181.2 180.9 180.5 more detail.
Weight (lbs) 180.0 180.1 180.2 180.6
83.0 82.9 82.3 81.2 Impedance
SMM (lbs) 80.8 80.5 80.2 79.8 RA LA TR RL
Z (Ω) 1 321.6 316.2 20.0 224.2
19.5 19.7 19.8 20.0
PBF (%) 19.0 19.2 19.2 19.3 5 313.3 310.9 19.5 220.3
Percent Body Fat 50 279.0 279.2 16.5 199.4
0.392 0.391 250 253.5 252.7 13.3 183.2
ECW/TBW 0.389 0.389 0.388 0.389 0.389 0.390 500 244.7 243.8 11.9 179.0
1000 237.3 236.3 10.7 176.4
Total 02.15.16 03.01.16 03.19.16 03.28.16 04.02.16 04.12.16 04.29.16 05.02.16
Recent 07:42 06:50 06:52 06:45 06:30 06:16 06:12 06:45
Copyright © 1996~ by InBody Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. BR-
If you have a client whose graph looks similar, by testing this client’s body
composition and seeing their overall trend, you would be able to see that much of this
weight loss is due to the slow loss of muscle, leading to a higher percentage body fat.
BREAKING IT DOWN
A graph like this can be a real eye-opener for a client because it shows that negative changes
in body composition can occur if his or her weight remains the same or even decreases for
the wrong reason.
This person needs to be guided towards a solution that helps them retain their muscle mass
with some combination of nutrition and strength training.
E X T R A S F O R T H I S S E C T I O N O N T H E I N B O DY B LO G
· Why Tracking Changes in Body Composition Leads To Results Read

· How To Set a Body Composition Goal That’s Right For You Read

CHAPTER THREE
SEGMENTAL LEAN ANALYSIS:

YOUR MAGNIFYING GLASS
[InBody770]
Visceral Fat Area
109.6
163.3
SEGMENTAL LEAN ANALYSIS

100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
11.3
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
In this section, 163.3
you’ll learn: 20 40 60 80
SMM· How to (lbs) spot problem areas in110your120client’s
70
80 90 100 130
development
140 150 160 170
· How 40 your client
100compares
220 to
280others
Body Fat Mass (lbs)
60 80 160 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0
13.4
· If your client is sufficiently developed in all sections of their body Lean Body Mass + 0.0
Obesity Analysis · If your client has muscle imbalances (+) means to gain fat/lean (-) means to l

BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
Body Mass Index
(kg/m2) 24.1 Right Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
PBF (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
(%) 124.4 1838 kcal
(lbs)
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%)
8.91 0.368 45.1 lbs
122.5
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk (%)
67.3 0.357 73.1 %
116.0 Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
Right Leg (%)
22.51 0.352
111.3 Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.
Left Leg (lbs)
(%)
22.60 0.355 250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.
111.7
RA LA TR RL
ø( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
T
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450
ECW/TBW 0.357
here are many valuable outputs on the Result Sheet. However, the Segmental LeanInterpretation
Results QR Code
Analysis, if used properly is arguably
Body Composition History the most powerful section of the Scan
Result the QR Code to see
Sheet.
164.2 163.0 163.2 163.3 163.5 more detail.
Weight (lbs) 162.1 162.8 163.3
88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance
SMM
Z (Ω) 1 291.2 295.4 27.4 282.
9.0 8.5 8.7 8.0 9.2 8.5 8.3 8.2 5 282.1 286.2 26.6 273.
PBF (%)
Percent Body Fat 50 236.3 240.6 21.5 224.
250 206.3 210.6 17.1 193.
ECW/TBW 0.357 0.362 0.359 0.358 0.362 0.360 0.356 0.357 500 198.4 202.4 15.5 186.
1000 193.5 197.3 14.8 181.
06.16.16 06.21.16 07.08.16 07.19.16 07.28.16 08.02.16 08.13.16 08.23.16
Recent Total 10:01 10:12 10:27 09:45 09:30 10:56 10:29 10:22

C H3 / S E G M E N TA L L E A N A N A LY S I S
L E A N B O DY M A S S V S. M U S C L E M A S S
In order to fully understand this section, you must fully understand what it is not.
The information in the Segmental Lean Analysis shows how much Lean Body Mass is
contained in each segment; not how much “muscle” is in each segment.
This is an important distinction, which you can learn more about in our blog post
“Lean Body Mass vs. Skeletal Muscle Mass: What’s The Difference?”
While it is true that Skeletal Muscle gains in a body segment will be reflected as
gains in the Segmental Lean Analysis chart, not every gain in Lean Body Mass can be
explained by muscle. That’s because Lean Body Mass also accounts for body water.
This makes this chart useful not just for tracking muscle, but also for injury and
disease states.

Visceral Fat Area
109.6
163.3
100
TO P A N D Muscle-Fat
B OT TO M BAnalysis
ARS 50
11.3
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
163.3 20 40 60 80
The InBodySMM
divides the body (lbs)
into805 body
70 90 segments:
100 110 120 the
130two
140 arms,
150 two
160 legs,
170 and the
87.5
legs. Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Co
trunk, which can be thought of as60covering the160area between the neck and
Body Fat Mass (lbs) 40 80 100 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0
The information 13.4
for each body segment is reported as two bars.

BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
T H E TO P BBody
AR Mass Index
(kg/m2) 24.1 Right Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
PBF (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
(%) 104.1 1838 kcal
(lbs)
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%)
7.58 0.378 45.1 lbs
102.3
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk (%)
60.1 0.370 73.1 %
101.8 Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
Right Leg (%)
19.67 0.369
95.5 Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.
Left Leg (lbs)
(%)
19.31 0.373 250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.
93.8
RA LA TR RL
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
The top barECW/TBW
shows how much Lean Body Mass in pounds is in a given segment.
0.357 Results Interpretation QR Code
Just like with the Muscle-Fat Graph, the top bar of the Segmental Lean Analysis Scan the QR Code to see
compares the pounds of Lean Body Mass against the average expected amount of
164.2
163.0 163.2 163.3 163.5 163.3 more detail.
Weightfor that(lbs)
Lean Body Mass person’s height. 162.1 162.8
88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance
SMM (lbs) 86.5 87.5 RA LA TR RL
Your clients should always work to be at 100% or higher.
Z (Ω) 1 291.2 295.4 27.4 282.
9.2
9.0 8.7 8.5 8.3
PBF (%) 8.5 8.0 8.2 5 282.1 286.2 26.6 273.
Percent Body Fat 50 236.3 240.6 21.5 224.
250 206.3 210.6 17.1 193.
ECW/TBW 0.357 0.362 0.359 0.358 0.362 0.360 0.356 0.357 500 198.4 202.4 15.5 186.
1000 193.5 197.3 14.8 181.
06.16.15 06.21.15 07.08.15 07.19.15 07.28.15 08.02.15 08.13.15 08.23.15
Recent Total 10:01 10:12 10:27 09:45 09:30 10:56 10:29 10:22

Visceral Fat Area
C H3 / S39.0
E G M E N TA L L E A N A N A LY SIS
109.6
163.3
100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
11.3
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
163.3 20 40 60 80
T H E B OT TO M BAR
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Body Fat Mass (lbs)
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass - 0.0
13.4
The bottom bar is different. The number shown by the bottom bar is the percentage
and makes it easier to quickly understand see how close to (or past) 100% each bar
extends. BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 22.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
(kg/m ) 24.1
2
PBF (%)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Left Arm ( 0.2 lbs) 16.7%
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
(%) 104.1 1838 kcal
(lbs)
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%)
7.58 0.378 45.1 lbs
102.3
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk (%)
60.1 0.370 73.1 %
101.8 Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA LA TR RL
Right Leg (%)
19.67 0.369
95.5 Xc(Ω) 5 18.7 19.0 2.2 19.
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 27.6 27.7 3.5 30.
Left Leg (lbs)
(%)
19.31 0.373 250 19.8 18.4 1.6 19.
93.8
RA LA TR RL
0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 6.7 6.6 9.4 7.8
ECW/TBW 0.357
What is this bar showing? It’s comparing your client’s Lean Body Mass against their
measured body
Body weight. This shows
Composition whether or not your client has enough Lean
History Scan the QR Code to see
Body Mass to support their 164.2
own body weight, where 100% = sufficient.
163.0 163.2 163.3 163.5 163.3 more detail.
Weight (lbs) 162.1 162.8
88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance
SMM
BREAKING IT DOWN Z (Ω) 1 291.2 295.4 27.4 282.
9.0 8.7 9.2 8.5 8.3
PBF (%) 8.5 8.0 8.2 5 282.1 286.2 26.6 273.
Percent Body Fat 50 236.3 240.6 21.5 224.
250 206.3 210.6 17.1 193.
In the aboveECW/TBW 0.357
example, the 3 upper 0.362
body 0.359 are
segments 0.358 0.362
over 0.360
100%, but the lower body
0.356 0.357 500 198.4 202.4 15.5 186.
1000 193.5 197.3 14.8 181.
segments are not.
06.16.15 06.21.15 07.08.15 07.19.15 07.28.15 08.02.15 08.13.15 08.23.15
Recent Total 10:01 10:12 10:27 09:45 09:30 10:56 10:29 10:22
If you’re working with a client like this, they may benefit from exercises that target Lean Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR
Body Mass development in their legs. This will help them achieve a more balance body
composition and may have other positive effects, such as body fat reduction, as well.

W H I C H C L I E N T S M AY B E AT R I S K F O R U N D E R D E V E LO P M E N T?
Any person can theoretically be underdeveloped in a body segment, and without

Segmental Lean Analysis, identifying this can be difficult.
However, several groups of clients may be at more risk than others. Here are three.
1. Sedentary adults
Sedentary adults who do not exercise commonly have below 100% Segmental
Lean Mass especially in their legs, primarily due to jobs that require them to sit
throughout most of the day.
2. “Skinny Fat” individuals (sarcopenic obese)

People with “skinny fat” profiles have more fat than is healthy for their bodies
coupled with a low amount of Lean Body Mass. Their relatively overdeveloped fat
or underdeveloped muscle mass contributes to their body weight, and may result
in scores below 100% for one or more body segment.
3. The elderly
The elderly are at particular risk for not having sufficiently developed Lean Body
Mass due to their tendency to lose muscle as a result of increasing inactivity. This
impacts their ability to care for themselves as they age and puts them at greater
risk of falling and broken bones.

64.2
135.3
Dry Lean Mass (lbs) 23.8
150
Body Fat Mass (lbs) 47.4 100
Muscle-Fat Analysis
50
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
135.3 20
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Skeletal Muscle Mass 47.6 Body Fat - Lean
U P P E R / LO W E R M U S C L E I M 40B A L A
60
N C 80E 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass
Lean Body Mass
Upper/lowerObesity Analysis are a fairly common in today’s increasingly sedentary
body imbalances (+) means to gain fat/
workforce, and you’ll likely encounter cases where the upper body is developed, but Segmental Fat
BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 21.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
the lower body isn’t,
Body Mass Index like in the example below.
(kg/m ) 2
22.5 Right Arm ( 3.
PBF (%)
8.0 13.0 18.0 23.0 28.0 33.0 38.0 43.0 48.0 53.0 58.0 Left Arm ( 3.
Percent Body Fat 35.0 Trunk ( 24.
Right Leg ( 7.
Left Leg ( 7.
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Basal Metabol
Right Arm (%) 1
(lbs)
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%) 2
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk (%) 7
Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA
Right Leg (%) Xc(Ω) 5 21.1
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 37.0
(lbs)
Left Leg (%)
250 32.3
Whole Body Pha
ECW/TBW Analysis
RA
ø( ˚) 50 4.7
BREAKING IT DOWN 0.320 0.340 0.360 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450
ECW/TBW 0.376 Results Interpre
Scan the QR Code
If your clientBody Composition
looks like this, he or sheHistory
needs to increase the LBM in their lower legs. Even results interpretatio
though the upper body is sufficiently developed, the lower body 137.6
is still at risk for injury due
135.5 134.9 135.4 136.1 135.2 135.3 more detail.
Weight
to the low amount of Lean Body(lbs) Mass. This client, despite their upper body, risks134.6
developing
health issues if they keep this body composition.
45.6 45.3 45.7 47.6 Impedance
SMM (lbs)
42.8 43.2 44.0 44.7 RA
Z (Ω) 1 513.6
40.3 39.5 38.6
PBF (%)
37.9 37.4 36.7 35.9 35.0
5 503.3
Percent Body Fat 50 452.0
250 411.5
ECW/TBW 0.376 0.378 0.376 0.374 0.376 0.376 0.378 0.376 500 396.7
1000 384.3
Recent Total 11.12.15 11.25.15 12.02.15 12.16.15 12.25.15 01.02.15 01.15.15 01.28.15
07:13 07:15 07:05 07:01 06:58 06:45 07:11 07:13
Copyright © 1996~ by InBody C

135.3
Body Fat Mass (lbs) 47.4 100
Muscle-FatCAnalysis
H3 / S E G M E N TA L L E A N A N A LY S I S
50
55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
Weight (lbs)
135.3 20
SMM (lbs)
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Skeletal Muscle Mass 47.6 Body Fat - Lean
40 60 80 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
Body Fat Mass
Lean Body Mass
RIGHT/ LEFT MUSCLE IMBALANCE
Obesity Analysis (+) means to gain fat/
Segmental Fat
BMI 10.0 15.0 18.5 21.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
Another imbalance
Body Mass Indexthe Segmental Lean Analysis can
(kg/m ) 2
22.5reveal is the imbalance Right Arm ( 3.
between thePBF
right and left (%) arms8.0and/or
13.0 legs.
18.0 23.0 28.0 33.0 38.0 43.0 48.0 53.0 58.0 Left Arm ( 3.
Percent Body Fat 35.0 Trunk ( 24.
Right Leg ( 7.
Left Leg ( 7.
ECW/TBW
(lbs)
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Basal Metabol
Right Arm (%) 1
(lbs)
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Leg Lean Mass
Left Arm (%) 2
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
(lbs)
Trunk (%) 7
Reactance
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
(lbs) RA
Right Leg (%) Xc(Ω) 5 21.1
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 50 37.0
(lbs)
Left Leg (%)
250 32.3
Whole Body Pha
ECW/TBW Analysis
RA
Although this client has a balanced
0.320
upper
0.340
body,
0.360
there’s
0.380 0.390
a0.400
significant
0.410
imbalance
0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 4.7
ECW/TBW
between the right and left legs. There are many reasons0.376 why this could have Results Interpre
occurred: For example, an injury can cause swelling and cause the LBM values to go Scan the QR Code
up. Body Composition History results interpretatio
(lbs) 135.5 134.9 135.4
136.1 137.6 135.2 134.6 135.3 more detail.
Weight
BREAKING IT DOWN
45.6 45.7 47.6 Impedance
SMM 43.2 44.0 44.7 45.3
(lbs) 42.8 RA
Z (Ω) 1 513.6
If you are working 40.3body39.5 38.6 looks
PBF with a client (%)
whose composition 37.9 like this, it36.7
37.4 is helpful to find
35.9 35.0 5 503.3
out more about his
Percent Bodyor
Fat her medical history to determine whether an imbalance is due to 50 452.0
swelling or from underdeveloped LBM. 0.378 250 411.5
ECW/TBW 0.376 0.376 0.374 0.376 0.376 0.378 0.376 500 396.7
1000 384.3
Recent Total 11.12.15 11.25.15 12.02.15 12.16.15 12.25.15 01.02.15 01.15.15 01.28.15
07:13 07:15 07:05 07:01 06:58 06:45 07:11 07:13
E X T R A S F O R T H I S S E C T I O N O N T H E I N B O DY B LO G Copyright © 1996~ by InBody C
· Lean Body Mass vs. Skeletal Muscle Mass: What’s the Difference? Read
· Does Muscle Turn Into Fat? Read

CHAPTER FOUR
CUSTOMIZABLE
OUTPUTS
CUSTOMIZABLE OUTPUTS
· How to track visceral fat and segmental fat
· How to guide a client to their average weight
· How to use BMR to offer nutritional guidance
O
n the right hand side of the Result Sheet are a series of additional outputs that you
can mix and match to suit your business needs. Depending on which InBody unit you
are using, the outputs available may vary.
[InBody770]
Age Gender Test DateIn the following pages, you’ll learn about 4 of the most use outputs. All of these are
/ Time
31 Female 01.28.2015 07 : 13
available on the InBody 770. These are:
tal Body Water Lean Body Mass Weight

Visceral Fat Area Visceral Fat Area
VFA (cm )
2
64.2
88.0 200
135.3
150
105.6
100
50
100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205
135.3 20 40 60 80 Age
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
.6 Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Control Body Fat-Lean Mass Control
100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520
47.4
(+) means to gain fat/lean (-) means to lose fat/lean
21.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0

Segmental Fat Analysis Segmental Fat Analysis
22.5 Right Arm ( 3.3 lbs) 158.9%
23.0 28.0 33.0 38.0 43.0 48.0 53.0 58.0 Left Arm ( 3.3 lbs) 158.9%
35.0 Trunk ( 24.0 lbs) 202.2%
Left Leg ( 7.1 lbs) 132.4%
ECW/TBW
100
.17
120 140 160 180 200
0.374
Basal Metabolic Rate Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR)
8.6 1231 kcal
100 120 140 160 180 200 Leg Lean Mass
.03 0.374 26.9 lbs
.6
100 110 120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
39.6 0.377 Guide to the InBody73.0
The Professional’s Result
% Sheet 33
2.7 Reactance
100 110 120 130 140 150
.36 0.374 RA LA TR RL LL
6 Xc(Ω) 5 21.1 20.9 1.9 20.8 20.2
100 110 120 130 140 150 50 37.0 36.9 3.2 37.5 35.3
C H4 / C U S TO M I Z A B L E O U T P U T S
V I S C E R A L FAT A R E A
[InBody770]
you may know, there are two main types of body fat: subcutaneous and visceral.
Gender Test DateAs/ Time
The Visceral
Female 01.28.2015 07 : 13 Fat Area* graph allows you to determine how much harmful visceral fat
your client has.
Water Lean Body Mass Weight

Visceral Fat Area
VFA (cm )
2
88.0 200
135.3
150
105.6
100
50
130 145 160 175 190 205
5.3 20 40 60 80 Age
120 130 140 150 160 170
Body Fat - Lean Body Mass Control

220 280 340 400 460 520
The graph looks a bit complicated
Body Fat Mass - quite
but is actually 18.3 lbs
simple to read.
47.4
The “100” on the left side
LeanofBody
the graph + 9.3
Mass represents cm2 of visceral fat.
100lbs
You should advise yourSegmental Fat below

clients to stay Analysisthis line for optimal health and to reduce
30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
health risks.
.5 Right Arm ( 3.3 lbs) 156.0%
33.0 38.0 43.0 48.0 53.0 58.0 Left Arm ( 3.3 lbs) 158.9%
35.0 BREAKING IT DOWN Trunk ( 24.0 lbs) 202.2%
Research has found that Left
visceral 7.1 lbs)
Leg fat is( particularly influenced by cardiovascular exercise.
132.4%
ECW/TBW
Encouraging your client to engage in more cardiovascular exercise may improve his or her
140 160 180 200 Basal Metabolic Rate
0.374 loss of visceral fat.
health by promoting
1231 kcal
140 160 180 200 Leg Lean Mass
* Visceral Fat 0.374
Level on InBody 570 Result Sheet
26.9 lbs
120 130 140 150 TBW/LBM
0.377 73.0 %
Reactance
120 130 140 150
0.374 RA LA TR RL LL
Xc(Ω) 5 21.1 20.9 1.9 20.8 20.2
120 130 140 150 50 37.0 36.9 3.2 37.5 35.3
0.377 250 32.3 32.2 3.4
The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet
26.4 27.8 34
5.4˚
RA LA TR RL LL
01.28.2015 07 : 13
Body Mass Weight C H4 / C U S TO M I Z A B L E O U T P U T S

Visceral Fat Area
VFA (cm ) 2
8.0 200
135.3
150
B O DY FAT-L E A N B O DY M A S S C O105.6
NTROL
100
This section makes it incredibly simple to set goals for your client. It is designed to
50
help your client reach their ideal body composition, which is defined as the average
160 175 190PBF205
for their gender (15% for men, 23% for women).
20 40 60 80 Age
140 150 160 170

340 400 460 520

40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
Depending on your Right Arm
client’s ( 3.3
current lbs)
Muscle-Fat balance, 156.0%
this section of the Result
43.0 48.0 53.0Sheet
58.0will recommend adjusting(Body
Left Arm lbs)Mass and/or LBM
3.3 Fat 158.9%in order to reach the
5.0 target PBF. Trunk ( 24.0 lbs) 202.2%
If your client is overfat, the InBody will advise losing a certain number of pounds
Left Leg ( 7.1 lbs) 132.4%
ofECW/TBW
fat mass and maintaining or increasing LBM. The InBody will never recommend
180 200 losing LBM. Basal Metabolic Rate
0.374
1231 kcal
180 200 Leg Lean Mass
0.374 26.9 lbs
140 150 TBW/LBM
BREAKING IT DO WN
0.377 73.0 %
Reactance
These recommendations are meant to be general guidelines for helping individuals achieve
140 150
0.374 RAmay have
optimal health. However, your clients LA theirTRownRL LL and these should be
set of goals,
discussed prior to planning
(Ω) 5a routine for
21.1 meeting those
1.9 goals.
Xc 20.9 20.8 20.2
140 150 5037.0 36.9 3.2 37.5 35.3
0.377 25032.3 32.2 3.4 26.4 27.8
5.4˚
RA LA TR RL LL
0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 4.7 4.5 7.0 6.2 6.0

50
160 175 190 205
20 40 60 80 Age
140 150 160 170

340 400 460 520
S E G M E N TA L FAT A NBody
Lean A LY S Mass
IS + 9.3 lbs

40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
Right Arm ( 3.3 lbs) 158.9%
43.0 48.0 53.0 58.0 Left Arm ( 3.3 lbs) 158.9%
Trunk ( 24.0 lbs) 202.2%
Left Leg ( 7.1 lbs) 132.4%
ECW/TBW
180 200 Basal Metabolic Rate
0.374
1231 kcal
In the above example, the person above has 3.3 pounds of body fat in their left arm.
0.374
For a person of their height and gender, that’s 158.9%, or 58.9% more body fat than
26.9andlbsgender.
the average person with the same height
140 150 TBW/LBM
0.377 73.0 %
Reactance
140 150
B R E A K I N G I T DXc
OW(Ω)N 5 21.1 20.9 1.9 20.8 20.2
140 150 50 37.0 36.9 3.2 37.5 35.3
0.377 250 32.3 32.2 3.4 26.4 27.8
This section can be used to track your client’s improvements in body composition and
Whole
changes in body fat, Body
over time. Phase
While studies Angle
have shown that you can’t “spot target” body
5.4˚
fat with exercise, you can use this section to encourage your clients and give them a more
detailed account of the improvements they are making.
RA LA TR RL LL
0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 ø( ˚) 50 4.7 4.5 7.0 6.2 6.0

135.3 135.0 135.3 more detail.
47.9 Impedance
46.5 47.6 LL
RA LA TR RL
Z (Ω) 1 513.6 530.2 31.0 407.2 396.2
34.2 33.9 35.0
The 5 Result503.3
Professional’s Guide to the InBody Sheet 521.9 30.0 397.3 386.8 36
50 452.0 470.2 26.3 346.4 338.7
250 411.5 429.7 22.4 313.2 307.3
0.378
160 175 190 205
20 40 60 80 Age
140 150 160 170

340 400 460 520
B A S A L M E TA B O L I C R AT E (B M R)
40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
Right
The Basal Metabolic Arm
Rate, ( 3.3
or BMR, is the )
lbsnumber 156.0%
of calories your client needs in
43.0 48.0 53.0 58.0 to maintain
order Left Arm
their ( 3.3 functions.
basic essential lbs) 158.9%
This value allows you to guide
your clients’ nutritional
Trunk plans, which
( 24.0islbs )
essential to helping them reach their body
202.2%
composition goals.
Left Leg ( 7.1 lbs) 132.4%
ECW/TBW
180 200 Basal Metabolic Rate
0.374
1231 kcal
0.374 26.9 lbs
140 150 TBW/LBM
Your clients might not fully understand what the BMR is, and they may think that
0.377
their BMR is the number of calories they should eat in a day - This is NOT the case!
73.0 %
Reactance
140 150 BMR does not take into account any calories needed to perform daily activities, and
so your client’s actual caloric need for the day is likely much higher than their BMR.
Xc(Ω) 5 21.1 20.9 1.9 20.8 20.2
140 150 50 37.0 36.9 3.2 37.5 35.3
0.377 250 32.3 32.2 3.4 26.4 27.8
5.4˚
E X T R A S F O R T H I S S E C T I O N O N T H E I N B O DY B LO G
· How To Use BMR To Hack Your RA

Diet LA TR RL LL Read
0.420 0.430 0.440 · Your ø( ˚ 50

)
0.450 Metabolism and 4.7Composition
Your Body 4.5 7.0 6.2 6.0 Read

135.3 135.0 135.3 more detail.
47.9 Impedance
46.5 47.6 LL
RA LA TR RL
Z (Ω) 1 513.6 530.2 31.0 407.2 396.2
34.2 33.9 35.0 5 503.3 521.9 30.0 397.3 386.8
50 452.0 470.2 26.3 346.4 338.7
250 411.5 429.7 22.4 313.2 307.3
0.376 0.378 0.376
The Professional’s Guide to the 500
InBody Result396.7
Sheet
414.8 20.0 305.0 300.2 37
1000 384.3 402.2 17.8 299.4 294.0

01.02.15 01.15.15 01.28.15
CHAPTER FIVE
UNLOCKING THE POWER OF

THE RESULT SHEET
CASE STUDY #1
Member Retention
Chuze Fitness
“ ”
It’s something I know is going to keep the
members there because now they have a
tool that’s going to allow them to track their
progress.”
Corey Brightwell
Co-founder, Chuze Fitness

· How tracking members with the Body Composition History added
significant value to existing programs
· How the Result Sheet became a vehicle for member retention
· How the Result Sheet allowed for new member retention strategies, like
competitions
W hat started off as a simple need to track results became much, much more.
Business was booming for Chuze Fitness, and the Team Training group exercise
classes were rapidly becoming one of the most popular draws for members.
However, this new volume of members presented Cory Brightwell, Chuze Fitness’
co-founder, with a new problem: how was he doing to reliably track progress for all
the participants?
Already, Chuze had made the conscious decision to step away from using traditional
body weight scales. Brightwell wanted to break people’s fixation with body weight
and remove what can be a discouraging barrier for people’s motivation.
So, he brought in an InBody 570. The results were immediate.
“The InBody for us was a simple, easy-to-use tool for members. All they have to do
is come up with their workout clothes, take their shoes and socks off, stand it for a
couple minutes and boom, they’ve got it, they’re done,” said Brightwell.

C H5 / C H U Z E F I T N E S S
Tracking the progress for Chuze members became a breeze, and the detailed
information on the InBody result sheet proved to be a lure for the members. Chuze’s
members began wanting to know the impact all their hard work at Chuze was having
on their bodies. Were they losing body fat like they planned? How much muscle had
they gained over the past month? These questions kept the members engaged with
their fitness – and coming back to Chuze, month after month.
“It’s a huge retention tool. It’s something I know is going to keep the members there
because they now have a tool that’s going to allow them to constantly track their
progress, and that’s huge,” remarked Brightwell.
However, the ability to track progress proved to be only part of the draw. Over time,
Brightwell found another keep his membership engaged with his InBody device: body
composition challenges. Similar to traditional weight loss challenges, Brightwell
created a program to challenge his members to improve their body composition in
what became known as “Chuze to Lose” competitions.
The combination of member retention and engagement proved to be essential for

Chuze Fitness as they open new locations. Now, if there is Team Training, Brightwell
ensures that there’s an InBody there to track and push his members forward towards
their goals.
WATC H V I D E O: C H U Z E F I T N E S S

CASE STUDY #2
Validating Services with data-driven decisions
Restoration Healthcare
“ I started in my mind putting it in a business

model. If it helped people realize data to
make decisions, that worked better for us. If
it helped them keep compliant, it was better
”
for us.
Dr. Tom Bakman
President, Restoration Healthcare

· How body composition data can reveal root causes to complex issues
· How tracking Visceral Fat Area and Phase Angle data can improve patient health
· How data-driven decision making validates and solidifies a medical practice
W
hen it comes to medical care, patients care only about one thing: results.
They want to feel that their doctor understands them and that the
prescriptions and programs they provide are having an impact on their conditions.
Dr. Tom Bakman acutely recognizes this demand. “People want to see truth. In the
world we live in right now, they want to be able to base decisions on something that’s
truthful and data-driven,” said Bakman. “So, the more data that we can give them and
help them understand the data, it empowers them to make better decisions as far as
their healthcare.”
Bakman uses the InBody 770 at the functional medical group he founded,
Restoration Healthcare. Originally, he believed that he would use it only for weight
loss. “Now,” said Bakman, “we use it for every single patient that comes in the office.”
The body composition data that the Result Sheet gives Bakman allows him to find
root causes to problems so he can prescribe better treatments. When athletes,
particularly runners, come to Bakman with issues, he relies on the Segmental Lean
Analysis to discover muscle imbalances. If the data reveals that one leg is less
developed than the other, Bakman can prescribe appropriate therapies to correct it.

C H5 / R E S TO R AT I O N H E A LT H C A R E
Bakman also finds significant value in the Visceral Fat and Phase Angle Data provided
by the InBody 770 Result Sheet. He recalled a particular patient who came in with a
whole host of issues, including anxiety. When he tested his patient and showed him
the results, it was “a cold reality check” for him, as Bakman put it.
“His visceral fat area was off the chart; he was highly inflamed. His Phase Angle was
low. He was at 35% body fat,” Bakman remembered. After identifying these issues
with the InBody, Bakman put his patient on a biodentical hormone therapy program
and counseled him to on lifestyle changes he could make. When he retested his
patient three months later, the data revealed that Bakman’s prescriptions were
working: 9 pounds of gained Lean Body Mass, a 5% reduction in body fat, and a 40%
reduction in Visceral Fat Area.
“You think this guy’s happy?” said Bakman. “He’s incredibly happy and it wasn’t until
we got the data for him to show it.”
These data-driven solutions have built Bakman’s reputation in the highly competitive
Southern California medical market. Bakman uses the InBody data to partner with
his patients and show the impact his prescriptions have. That’s solidified his role and
helped his practice grow.
WATC H V I D E O: R E S TO R AT I O N H E A LT H C A R E

CASE STUDY #3
Growing Your Membership
NASA Johnson Space Center/Starport Services
“ The machine has proven itself. It’s passed

the ‘NASA test’ from a trust standpoint.
Evan Thoman
Employee Wellness Manager, NASA Johnson Space Center
”
In this section, you’ll learn how NASA JSC:
· Created excitement for the corporate wellness program
· Created that excitement using the Result Sheet
· Saw a 48.6% increase in enrollment in one year
T
he NASA Johnson Space Center’s corporate wellness program is called
“Starport Services.” Their central mission is to support the health and wellness
of the NASA Johnson Space Center’s 11,000+ member workforce, which includes
NASA government employees and contractors.
In order to get more people signed up at Starport Services, Employee Wellness

Manager Evan Thoman needed to get his workforce excited about improving their
physical fitness. That’s where the InBody Result Sheet came into play.
However, before he could get his workforce excited, he had to get them educated.
Thoman launched a series of “Know Your Numbers” campaigns for the workforce
that taught the important body composition metrics like Percent Body Fat, Lean
Body Mass, Skeletal Muscle Mass, Basal Metabolic Rate, etc.
Once his workforce was able to understand the basics of body composition and how
it applied to them, all that was left to do was to get people tested and their Result
Sheets printed.

C H5 / N A S A J O H N S O N S PAC E C E N T E R
Once a few people had their Result Sheets, the news spread like wildfire in the
Johnson Space Center. The Result Sheet became part of a word-of-mouth campaign,
selling itself over and over again and getting more people excited to test and get
involved in the program.
“People who had never, ever planned on having an assessment done…all of the
sudden saw this results page that their co-workers were passing around and saw all of
the data that it presented, and then suddenly became every interested and wanted
to start tracking their own metrics,” Thoman said.
With help from his InBody, Starport Services enrollment grew from 2,800 in January
to 4,280 by December – a 48.6% increase in just one year. Thoman found that the
more educated his workforce became and the more people he was able to get tested,
the more people would get excited and encourage their friends to come for a test
themselves. That helped him grow the wellness program.
READ MORE

W E C A N H E L P YO U R B U S I N E S S G R O W
L E T’S TA L K.
You can improve your business by improving

your services, inspiring your current members
to stay with you, and build your reputation.
With InBody, you’ll not only get the best

product on the market, but a dedicated
partner committed to helping you reach your
business goals, just as you help your clients
reach theirs.
C O N TAC T I N B O DY

InBody E Book PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

InBody E Book PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

InBody E Book PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

T H E P R O F E S S I O N A L’S G U I D E TO

Now, on to the Result Sheet!

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 3

Values Total Body Water Lean Body Mass Weight

Skeletal Muscle Mass

Body Fat Mass (lbs)

Segmental Fat Analysis

88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance

Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR-USA-C7-A-131106

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 4

get into theSkeletal

Segmental Fat Analysis

Segmental Fat Analysis

Body Fat Mass

PBF In this section, you’ll learn:

T he ECW/TBW Analysis compares the ratio of ECW to TBW. Most healthy

Body Composition History

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 10

88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance

Segmental Fat Analysis

The 100% Body

88.5 89.2 87.1 87.2 88.0 87.1 Impedance

Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR-U

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 13

Segmental Fat Analysis

Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR-U

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 14

Segmental Fat Analysis

47.1 47.8 48.2 47.9 Impedance

John Doe 6ft. 00.0in. 26 Male 11.20.2015 07 : 45

168.4 169.7 170.4 171.7

Body Fat Mass

Segmental Lean Analysis

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 17

Segmental Fat Analysis

Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 18

Segmental Fat Analysis

Copyright © 1996~ by InBody Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. BR-U

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 19

71.2 70.3 70.5 Impedance

Copyright © 1996~ by InBody Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. BR-U

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 20

Segmental Fat Analysis

BODY COMPOSITION HISTORY

Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 21

Body Composition History

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 22

0.391 Results Interpretation QR Code

· Why Tracking Changes in Body Composition Leads To Results Read

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 23

SEGMENTAL LEAN ANALYSIS:

SEGMENTAL LEAN ANALYSIS

Segmental Fat Analysis

Copyright © 1996~ by InBody. All rights reserved. BR

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 25

The Professional’s Guide to the InBody Result Sheet 26

Segmental Fat Analysis