Math 111 Notes Week 303

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

10

Math 111 – Calculus I.


Week Number Three Notes
Fall 2002

I. Limits of Functions and Methods for Computing Them

Now that we have an “intuitive notion” of what a limit is and we see why this concept is
important, we will now “abstract” this notion and define the limit of a real-valued
function at a value x.

Definition 3.1: Assume f is a real-valued function with domain a subset of the real line.
Then, the limit as x approaches a of f(x) is L if for every positive integer there
exists a positive integer such that if |x-a| < then |f(x) – L| < We express this
utilizing the following notation.

lim f(x)  L
x a

What does the above definition mean intuitively? It says the following.

No matter HOW CLOSE we get to the number L (this is why  in the above definition is
arbitrary), we can find a distance about the x-value a (this is called  and usually depends
on ) such that if x is less than distance  from a (i.e. it is close to a), then f(x) is less than
 from L (i.e. it is “close” to L). NOTE: L does not have to equal f(a). IN FACT, a
MAY NOT BE A MEMBER OF THE DOMAIN OF f.

The concept of limit is the concept that underlies ALL OF CALCULUS. It is


ESSENTIAL that you UNDERSTAND THIS CONCEPT.

First let’s look at sketches of some functions to understand how this concept works.

Example 3.2: Consider the sketches of the following functions f(x) and g(x) below.

f(x) g(x)
11

Does the limit as x approaches a of f(x) exist? If so, what is it? If not, explain why not?
Does the limit as x approaches a of g(x) exist? If so, what is it? If not, explain why not?

Now that we have an idea on how to estimate limits of functions graphically, we will
focus on how to compute limits of functions using algebraic techniques (given an explicit
definition of the function).

Example 3.3(Similar to examples 1 and 2 from pp. 102-103 of Stewart): Compute the
following limits (or justify why they do not exist). Use your graphing calculator to assist
in verifying the correctness of your answers.

x9 t 2  25 5
(a ) lim 2
(b) lim 2

x 9 x  81 t 0 t t2
12

We will learn many techniques for computing limits as this semester progresses. At this
point, the following example is extremely difficult to compute using traditional algebraic
techniques. In this case, technology (such as our graphing calculator) can be an
invaluable tool (we learn how to explicitly evaluate and prove this limit later in the
course).

Example 3.4(Sec 2.2, problem 20, parts (a) and (b) on p. 110): Consider the following
function h(x).

tan(x) - x
h(x) 
x3

(a) Compute h(1), h(0.5), h(0.1), h(0.05), h(0.01), and h(0.005) respectively.

(b) Using your result in (a), estimate the following limit.

lim h(x)
x0

II. Some rules for computing limits (will be stated without proof)

Theorem 3.5: Assume that f and g are functions of a real-variable x, c is a real constant
and n is a positive integer. Moreover, assume that
lim f(x) exists and lim g(x) exists.
x a x a

Then,
(1) lim(f(x)g(x))  lim f(x) lim g(x)
(6) lim(f(x)) n  (lim f(x)) n
x a x a x a x a x a

(2) lim(f(x)g(x))  lim f(x) lim g(x)


x a x a x a
(7) lim(f(x))1/n  (lim f(x))1/n
x a x a

(3) lim cf(x)  c lim f(x)


x a x a

(4) lim f(x)g(x)  (lim f(x))(lim g(x))


x a x a x a

(5) lim(f(x)/ g(x))  (lim f(x)) /(lim g(x)) if lim g(x)  0.


x a x a x a x a
13

These are the standard rules that allow us to “decompose” limits into smaller pieces that
are calculable. Let’s go through two more examples to understand how these rules can
be utilized.

Example 3.6: Evaluate the limits below using the limit laws. Justify each step explicitly.

x3 1
(1) lim 5x 2  2x  3 (2) lim
x 4 x 1 x2 1

Example 3.7: Assume that

lim f(x)  L and lim g(x)  M.


x a x a

Compute
lim 5(f(x)) 3 g(x)  3f(x) 7
x a

using the limit laws.


14

The following theorem called the pinching or squeezing theorem for limits is also
extremely useful. If we know two functions that have the same limit at a given
value and a third function that we can “pinch” between the two functions (using
inequalities) near that value, then we can calculate the third functions limit as
well.

Theorem 3.8: Assume f(x) < g(x) < h(x) on an interval containing a real number a
(except possibly at a). Moreover, assume that

lim f(x)  lim h(x)  L.


x a x a

Then,
lim g(x)  L.
x a

The following example from the textbook will illustrate the use of this theorem.

Example 3.9(example 10, p. 116 of section 2.3 of Stewart): Use the pinching theorem and
known limits to show that

1
lim x 2 sin( )  0.
x 0 x
15

III. The notion of one-sided limits

The notion of a one-sided limit is as follows. Although a function may not have a well-
defined limit at a value a, it may have a limit if we approach the value from one direction
(either from the left – usually called a left-hand limit or from the right – usually called a
right-hand limit). I will define this concept formally now.

Definition 3.10: Assume f is a real-valued function with domain a subset of the real line.
Then, the right-hand limit as x approaches a of f(x) is L if for every positive integer
there exists a positive integer such that for x > a, if |x-a| < then |f(x) – L| <
We express this utilizing the following notation.

lim f(x)  L
x a 

Exercise: Analogously define the notion of a left-hand limit as x approaches a given real
number.

Let’s look at one more example to get an idea of the difference between a one-sided limit
versus a two-sided limit.

Example 3.11: Consider the sketches of the following functions f(x) and g(x) that we first
observed in example 3.2 (refer back to page 12 of the notes). Compute left-hand and
right-hand limits of f and g respectively as x approaches 1 or argue while the particular
one-sided limit fails to exist.

Finally, note the following result from the textbook relating one-sided and two-sided
limits of a function.

Theorem 3.12:

(1) lim f(x)  L if and only if lim f(x)  L and lim- g(x)  L.
x a x a x a
16

What does this theorem imply? Does it make intuitive sense?

Non Hand-In Homework Problems Associated with Week #3 Notes


Sections 2.2 and 2.3

Section 2.2: 1-6, 8,10,13,14,16,17,19


Section 2.3: 1-7,8,9-17, 20, 22, 23, 25, 29, 32, 36
Read Sections 2.4 through 2.5 of the textbook

EXAM #1: Friday, September 19th

You might also like