Judicial Affidavit
Judicial Affidavit
Judicial Affidavit
MARIA MAHINHIN
Complainant
-versus-
JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT
PURPOSES:
2. That the witness is not guilty of the acts being complained of or there
was no sexual favor that was being made as a condition to the giving
of a passing grade.
Thus, I declare:
1. Q: Mr. Witness, are you the same Mario Mahillig , who is named in the
complaint as the Dean in the Engineering Department?
A: Yes, Sir.
A: Yes Sir. That was the day when I gave my students in Calculus Subject
their Preliminary Examinations at 2nd Floor Room 123 of Northeastern
College.
6. Q: When you informed them, were there any reactions on their part?
A: Yes Sir. On the next day, January 18, 2017, they asked me if I could give
them another chance to take the exam again or just pass a requirement
to make up for the exam.
7. Q: Have you given them another chance to take the examination or let
them pass a requirement to pass the subject?
A: I have given their remedial examination on January 25, 2017 in the
morning.
A: Yes sir. I called one of the students whose number was in the first list
of the piece of paper being given, Maria Mahinhin, and to inform her that
she was the only one who failed the remedial exam and that I have not in
a good mood to check her paper because when I scanned her
examination booklet, what only I could see were many erasures and no
correct answers.
10. Q: What was her reaction if any when you have told her such
happenings?
A: I think she did not seem nervous nor shock when I informed her
considering that she already experienced getting failing grades for
different subjects for the past semester in which I was also their
Professor.
11. Q: Was this person talked to you in person after she has been informed
of the result?
A: Yes Sir. She came to my office, crying, and begging for another
remedial exam and that she did not want that such failure would come to
the knowledge of her parents because she said that they would lose
trust on her and not let her enrol again.
A: As far as I know very well the parents of Maria and considering that I
also have a daughter like her, I had given her a second chance and
instructed her to go to my office on January 27, 2017 at 7:00 in the
morning to take the exam.
A: No Sir because when I let her to come in my office, she saw first her
examination booklet and out of curiosity, she scanned it with my
permission but when she found out that there were no checks or any
marks in the said booklet, she asked me why I did not check it while the
other classmates who then took the remedial examination have some
marks and passed the examination. I explained her again that how could
I check her examination booklet if there was nothing to check, that what
only I could see were many erasures and wrong answers. After what
happened, she called me a bias person and I have this so-called
“favouritism” in class. She just went out of my office, crying, without
giving any respect and she forcibly closed the door.
14. Q: Can you tell us what happened after she went out of your office?
A: She told her classmates Sir that I did something terrible; that I force
her and made a sexual favour as a condition of giving her a passing
grade.
A: My office is just near where they are talking Sir and the window of my
office was open that time in which I could clearly hear their statements.
16. Q: Do you know the reason why Maria made such actions?
A: As far as I know sir, she made such actions because I failed her not
only in Calculus subject but also in other subjects in the previous
semester and she made some stories to cause my suspension or
termination as a College Dean.
A: Yes Sir.
MARIO MAHILIG
Affiant
3. Neither I nor any other person then present or assisting him coached the
said witnessed regarding the latter’s answer.