Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 19 views

    People of The Philippines,: Prepared By: Giles Edgar B. Daya Court Interpreter II

    Uploaded by

    Giles Daya
    The court heard a motion to defer the arraignment of the accused Christine Orbita regarding charges of serious physical injuries against a minor victim. The defense argued the court had no jurisdiction due to the victim's age, while the prosecution noted proof of the victim's age was lacking beyond the mother's statement. The arraignment was reset to allow clarification of the victim's age. In a separate case, the court heard a motion to defer promulgation of judgment against Franklin Abarquez for slight physical injuries to allow the defense to file a motion for reconsideration regarding deemed waiver of witnesses. The court granted the defense time to respond and set a tentative future date for promulgation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    People of The Philippines,: Prepared By: Giles Edgar B. Daya Court Interpreter II

    Uploaded by

    Giles Daya
    19 views2 pages
    The court heard a motion to defer the arraignment of the accused Christine Orbita regarding charges of serious physical injuries against a minor victim. The defense argued the court had no jurisdiction due to the victim's age, while the prosecution noted proof of the victim's age was lacking beyond the mother's statement. The arraignment was reset to allow clarification of the victim's age. In a separate case, the court heard a motion to defer promulgation of judgment against Franklin Abarquez for slight physical injuries to allow the defense to file a motion for reconsideration regarding deemed waiver of witnesses. The court granted the defense time to respond and set a tentative future date for promulgation.

    Original Description:

    letter

    Original Title

    Sept 11 2017 letter

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The court heard a motion to defer the arraignment of the accused Christine Orbita regarding charges of serious physical injuries against a minor victim. The defense argued the court had no jurisdiction due to the victim's age, while the prosecution noted proof of the victim's age was lacking beyond the mother's statement. The arraignment was reset to allow clarification of the victim's age. In a separate case, the court heard a motion to defer promulgation of judgment against Franklin Abarquez for slight physical injuries to allow the defense to file a motion for reconsideration regarding deemed waiver of witnesses. The court granted the defense time to respond and set a tentative future date for promulgation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    19 views2 pages

    People of The Philippines,: Prepared By: Giles Edgar B. Daya Court Interpreter II

    Uploaded by

    Giles Daya
    The court heard a motion to defer the arraignment of the accused Christine Orbita regarding charges of serious physical injuries against a minor victim. The defense argued the court had no jurisdiction due to the victim's age, while the prosecution noted proof of the victim's age was lacking beyond the mother's statement. The arraignment was reset to allow clarification of the victim's age. In a separate case, the court heard a motion to defer promulgation of judgment against Franklin Abarquez for slight physical injuries to allow the defense to file a motion for reconsideration regarding deemed waiver of witnesses. The court granted the defense time to respond and set a tentative future date for promulgation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Republic of the Philippines

    MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES


    8th Judicial Region
    Branch II, Tacloban City

    PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Crim. Case No. M-TAC-17-


    Plaintiff, 00016,19,20,21,23,24 and 26-CR

    FOR:
    -versus-
    SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES

    CHRISTINE JANE ORBITA


    Accused.
    x----------------------------------------x

    MINUTES

    Presiding Judge: HON. MANASSEH S. BASTES Date: June 21, 2017


    Stenographer: Joevic Corales
    Interpreter: Giles Edgar B. Daya

    Appearances:
     Accused
     Atty. Sajonia, PAO - for purposes of arraignment only

    Setting for today: Arraignment


     When called for arraignment, Counsel for the Accused, Atty. Sajonia moved for the
    deferment of the arraignment on the ground that the victim in this case was a minor to
    which the court has no jurisdiction. Said motion was based on the police blotter excerpt
    attached to the records.
     Prosecution then manifested that while they concur to the manifestation of the Defense
    counsel that the victim was a minor, there was no sufficient proof however that the
    latter was indeed a minor except the JUDAF of the mother which alleges that his son
    was only 6 years old.
     Prosecution did not object to a resetting and undertakes to subpoena private
    complainant to appear at her office to clarify the matter.
     Arraignment reset to JULY 25, 2017 at 8:30 AM

    Prepared by:

    GILES EDGAR B. DAYA


    Court Interpreter II
    Republic of the Philippines
    MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES
    8th Judicial Region
    Branch II, Tacloban City

    PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Crim. Case No. 2015-09-CR-13


    Plaintiff,
    FOR:
    -versus- SLIGHT PHYSICAL INJURIES
    FRANKLIN ABARQUEZ,
    Accused.
    x----------------------------------------x

    MINUTES

    Presiding Judge: HON. MANASSEH S. BASTES Date: June 28, 2017


    Stenographer: Joevic Corales
    Interpreter: Giles Edgar B. Daya

    Appearances:
     Accused
     ACP Andrade
     Defense: Atty. Andrew Astilla

    Setting for today: Promulgation of Judgment


     When this case was called for promulgation of judgment, Defense Counsel, Atty. Astilla moved
    for the deferment of the promulgation and manifested that they intend to file a motion for
    reconsideration of the April 19, 2017 order of this court declaring the accused to have deemed
    waived their right to present evidence for failure to file JUDAF of their witnesses on time.
    Counsel added that they were not in receipt of the copy of said order and requested that they
    be given a period of time within which to receive the written order. He further added that the
    reason why he was unable to attend the hearing last time was that at the time of the hearing,
    they were still awaiting for the resolution of the demurrer to evidence. They only received the
    resolution denying the demurrer after the last hearing.
     Prosecution objected to the deferment because as early as August of 2016, parties were already
    directed to submit their respective JUDAF but until now accused has not done so; and further
    inquired whether Defense Counsel was notified of the hearing in the previous setting. Defense
    counsel answered that he was notified but he was at the RTC and that according to him, he
    came to the court however hearing has already ended when he arrived.
     Court gave the accused 15 days to respond to the said written order and to furnish a copy to the
    prosecution who is given 15 days from receipt to file their comments and/or opposition thereto.
    Thereafter, the intended pleading shall be submitted for resolution
     Without prejudice to the outcome of the resolution, case was tentatively set to AUGUST 30,
    2017, at 8:30 AM for PROMULGATION OF JUDGMENT.

    Prepared by:

    GILES EDGAR B. DAYA


    Court Interpreter II

    You might also like