Republic of The Philippines National Capital Judicial Region Regional Trial Court Quezon City Branch 106

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION


REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
QUEZON CITY
BRANCH 106

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,


Plaintiff,

- versus - CRIM. CASE NO. Q-12-175140

RODOLFO G. BATASLAC,
Accused.
x----------------------------------------x

PETITION TO GRANT BAIL

ACCUSED, by counsel, and unto this Honorable Court most


respectfully alleges – that:

1. Accused herein is charged for Rape in an Information dated


September 13, 2012, which alleges that:

“That on or about the 14th of November


2008, in Quezon City, Philippines, the above-
named accused, by means of force and
intimidation, did, then and there willfully,
unlawfully and feloniously usher MARIA
CHRISTINA VERBO Y CABIGAS, a minor, 15
years old, to a room and locked the door, and
boxing her twice on her stomach and removed her
jogging pants and underwear and thereafter have
carnal knowledge with said Maria Christina Verbo
y Cabigas without her consent and against her
will, to the damage and prejudice of the said
offended party.

CONTRARY TO LAW.”
2. Presently, the accused is detained at the City Jail of Quezon
City as the Information recommends no bail for the said offense;

3. Under the Constitution, bail is a matter of right if the offense


involved is not punishable by reclusion perpetua, life imprisonment or
capital punishment. However, when the subject offense is punishable by
reclusion perpetua, life imprisonment or capital punishment but the
evidence of guilt is not strong, the accused is entitled to bail.

4. Thus, based on the records of this case during the preliminary


investigation, for the sole purpose of granting the accused a provisional
liberty, the evidence of guilt is not strong.

ALL THE ELEMENTS OF THE


CRIME OF RAPE ARE NOT
PRESENT.

5. The allegations in the Information constituting the elements


pertaining to the commission of the offense of Rape are not present in the
instant case.

6. The allegation of force and intimidation against the accused is


notadmit his sexual congress with complainant. Since the accused
contends that there is no sexual congress, the force or intimidation to
speak of as it was consensual

THEN ACCUSED DENIAL OF


OCCURRENCE OF RAPE ARE
CORROBORATED BY THREE
(3) WITNESSES

In a case decided by the Supreme Couert, it held:

“Physical impossibility refers not only to the


geographical distance between the place where the
accused was and the place where the crime was
committed when the crime transpired; but more
importantly, the facility of access between the two
places.” People v. Republo, G.R. No. 172962, July
8, 2010, citing People v. Ignas, 458 Phil. 965, 993
(2003).
THERE WAS NO AGGRAVATING
CIRCUMSTANCE

From the foregoing, it is quite clear that the prosecution has no


evidence at all to prove that the evidence of guilt against herein accused is
strong. Neither is there evidence to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Thus, the herein accused is entitled to bail. Well settled is the rule in this
jurisdiction that even if the crime imputed to the accused is punishable by
reclusion perpetua, he is still entitled to bail if the evidence of guilt is not
strong. This does not have to be established by him; it is for the prosecution
to prove the contrary, although it is not necessary at this point to prove guilt
beyond reasonable doubt. (Pareja vs. Gomez , 5 SCRA 823.)

THE ACCUSED IS NOT A


FLIGHT RISK.

The denial of this fundamental right is justified only if there is a great


probability of escape.

Even at the time of the arrest, the accused submitted himself with the police
enforcer. Thus, accused is

EVERYONE ENJOYS THE


PRESUMPTION OF
INNOCENCE.

JUSTICE AND EQUITY


DICTATES

WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is most respectfully prayed


of this Honorable Court that a bail, for the provisional liberty of the herein
accused pending trial, be fixed.
Other reliefs just and equitable in the premises are likewise prayed
for.
December ____, 2012
Pasig City for Quezon City, Metro-Manila.

MAGALONA LAW OFFICE


Counsel for the Accused
Unit G, 10th Floor Strata 100
Condominium Building
100 F. Ortigas, Jr. Road,
Ortigas Center, Pasig City
Metro Manila
Tel/Fax No. 4511594
Email: [email protected]

By:

HENNIE DIANNE CHRISTINE M.


MAGALONA
Roll of Attorneys No. 47546
IBP No. 885082-1/18/12-Quezon
PTR No.7040865-01/09/12-Pasig City
MCLE Compliance No. III-0013269
Issued on April 21, 2010

NOTICE

HON. BRANCH CLERK OF COURT


RTC, Branch 106
Quezon City

HON. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


Quezon City, Metro Manila

Greetings:

Please include the foregoing Petition for Bail in the Court’s calendar
of hearing on _______________ at ______________.

JESUS ROBERTO D. BERNABE, JR.


EXPLANATION OF SERVICE
BY REGISTERED MAIL
[Pursuant to Section 1, Rule 13 of the
1997 Rules of Civil Procedure]

ACCUSED, by counsel, submit that the foregoing Petition for Bail is


being filed to this Honorable Court and served to the adverse party by
registered mail due to distance, lack of time and absence of messengerial
personnel.

JESUS ROBERTO D. BERNABE, JR.

COPY FURNISHED:

HON. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


Quezon City, Metro Manila

You might also like