Accuracy of A Commercial Igm Elisa For The Diagnosis of Human Leptospirosis in Thailand
Accuracy of A Commercial Igm Elisa For The Diagnosis of Human Leptospirosis in Thailand
524–527
doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0423
Copyright © 2012 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Accuracy of a Commercial IgM ELISA for the Diagnosis of Human Leptospirosis in Thailand
Varunee Desakorn,* Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Vipa Thanachartwet, Duangjai Sahassananda, Wirongrong Chierakul,
Apichat Apiwattanaporn, Nicholas P. Day, Direk Limmathurotsakul, and Sharon J. Peacock
Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Department of Tropical Hygiene, Department of Microbiology and Immnunology and
Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;
Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom;
Medical Department, Udon Thani General Hospital, Udon Thani, Thailand
Abstract. The Leptospira immunoglobulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgM ELISA) has been recom-
mended for the rapid diagnosis of leptospirosis in endemic areas. We conducted a retrospective case-control study of
218 patients (109 leptospirosis cases confirmed by Leptospira culture and/or microscopic agglutination test and 109 control
patients with acute febrile illness) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a commercial IgM ELISA (Panbio) in north-
east Thailand. Paired serum samples taken on admission and at least 10 days after the onset of symptoms were tested.
Using the cutoff value recommended by the manufacturer (11 Panbio units), sensitivity and specificity of IgM ELISA on
paired sera were 90.8% and 55.1%. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff
value. This was 20 Panbio units, which gave a sensitivity and specificity of 76.1% and 82.6%, respectively, on paired sera.
We conclude that using either cutoff value, the accuracy of IgM ELISA is limited in our setting.
INTRODUCTION tic accuracy was very low (sensitivity ranged from 36.0% to
60.9% and specificity ranged from 65.1% to 98.0%).9–11 The
Leptospirosis is considered an emerging infectious dis- reason for poor performance in the latter studies may be that
ease in Thailand.1–3 Regular contact with the environment is in countries where leptospirosis is highly endemic, a variable
a major risk factor, with a study in Thailand reporting that lep- proportion of the apparently healthy population may be sero-
tospirosis accounted for around one-third of undifferentiated positive. This would result in variability in the optimal cutoff
fevers in agricultural workers.3 Such infection usually results value in different geographic regions. In this study, we tested
from contact with water or soil contaminated with pathogenic the hypothesis that the optimal cutoff for this assay in Thailand
Leptospira originating from the urine of maintenance (carrier) is higher than that stated by the manufacturer, and determined
hosts such as rodents. The clinical features of leptospirosis are the optimal cutoff value and diagnostic accuracy of the IgM
often nonspecific and severity ranges from a mild flu-like ill- ELISA in this setting.
ness to severe sepsis and septic shock. Signs and symptoms
of leptospirosis may resemble those of other diseases in the
tropics including dengue, scrub typhus, and malaria, resulting MATERIALS AND METHODS
in an inaccurate clinical diagnosis.4 Diagnostic confirmation is
The Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy
not attempted across much of the world, however, leading to
testing (STARD) were followed in this study.
sub-optimal patient management and a poor understanding of
Study patients. Patients with laboratory-confirmed lep-
disease epidemiology.
tospirosis (cases) or without leptospirosis (controls) were
In Thailand, the definitive diagnosis of leptospirosis is
identified from a prospective cohort study of consecutive
made by culture of Leptospira spp. from clinical samples such
patients presenting to Udon Thani hospital, northeast Thailand
as blood or urine, or by the reference serological assay, the
with an acute febrile illness between 2001 and 2002.12 In brief,
microscopic agglutination test (MAT). These tests require spe-
patients were recruited into the study during twice daily ward
cialist expertise, are labor-intensive, and provide a retrospec-
rounds. Inclusion criteria were patients who were ³ 15 years of
tive diagnosis.5 Several rapid serological diagnostic tests have
age with fever (> 37.8 °C) of unknown cause who agreed to
been developed as alternatives to MAT, of which a commer-
participate and to attend outpatient follow-up for a convalescent
cial immunoglobulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
serum sample. Exclusion criteria were patients with a definable
(IgM ELISA) is promising because it can be performed in a
source of infection on admission. Blood samples for Leptospira
greater number of laboratories throughout the tropics, and is
culture and serological testing were taken on admission, and a
inexpensive compared with MAT. The IgM ELISA has been
second serum sample taken 10 or more days after the onset of
recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) as
symptoms. Leptospira culture and MAT were performed as
a diagnostic test for the serodiagnosis of leptospirosis where
described previously.5,12 Serum was stored at –80 °C until anal-
healthcare resources are limited,4 although its reported accu-
ysis for IgM ELISA and MAT.
racy is variable. A number of studies have reported that IgM
Cases of leptospirosis were defined by isolation of patho-
ELISA has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis
genic Leptospira spp., and/or a 4-fold or greater rise or a
of acute leptospirosis.6–8 However, recent studies evaluating
single serum MAT titer of ³ 1:400. Controls (ratio 1:1) were
this test in Laos, Vietnam, and Hawaii found that its diagnos-
randomly selected from those patients who had convalescent
sample and did not meet the diagnostic criteria for leptospiro-
sis. Overall, 109 cases and 109 controls were recruited in our
* Address correspondence to Varunee Desakorn, Department of
Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol study. A database was constructed in which cases and controls
University, 420/6, Rajvithi Road, Bangkok, 10400 Thailand. E-mail: were entered, randomized, and blinded to the investigators
[email protected] before performing IgM ELISA.
524
ELISA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF LEPTOSPIROSIS IN THAILAND 525
Leptospira IgM ELISA. Detection of IgM antibodies to Government of Thailand. Each patient was recruited to the
Leptospira species was determined using a commercially study after written informed consent was obtained.
available Leptospira IgM ELISA (Panbio Pty., Ltd.,
Queensland, Australia). The assay was performed according RESULTS
to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, test sera, cutoff
calibrator, and positive and negative control sera were A case-control study consisting of 109 leptospirosis cases
diluted 1:100 in serum diluent, and 100 µL added to and 109 controls was used to evaluate the accuracy of the
Leptospira antigen-coated microwells and incubated for IgM ELISA. Of 109 leptospirosis cases, laboratory confirma-
30 minutes at 37 °C. After washing with phosphate-buffered tion was made on the basis of being positive by culture and
saline containing 0.05% Tween 20, 100 µL of HRP conjugated MAT in 19 patients (17%), culture positive/MAT negative
anti-human IgM was added and incubated for another in 15 patients (14%), and culture negative/MAT positive in
30 minutes at 37 °C. After further washing, 100 µL of 75 patients (69%). The proportion of study patients who were
tetramethylbenzidine substrate was added and incubated at male was 82% and 57% for cases and controls, respectively
room temperature for 10 minutes, after which the reaction (P < 0.001). Three cases (2%) and four controls (4%) died
was stopped with 100 µL of 1 M phosphoric acid. The during hospital admission (P > 0.1). All patients in the con-
absorbance of each well was read at a wavelength of 450 nm trol group had a convalescent serum sample taken a median of
with a Bio-Tek ELX 808 plate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, 17 days (interquartile range [IQR] 13–21 days, range 10–43 days)
Winooski, VT). The results were expressed as Panbio units after the onset of symptoms. The discharge diagnoses of con-
calculated by the ratio of sample absorbance to the mean trols were as follows: scrub typhus (N = 51), bacterial septice-
cutoff absorbance multiplied by 10. The recommended cutoff mia (N = 8) (Escherichia coli [N = 2], Klebsiella pneumoniae
for a positive result is a value of ³ 11 Panbio units, and is [N = 2], Acinetobacter baumannii [N = 1], Corynebacterium
interpreted by the manufacturer to indicate recent infection jeikeium [N = 1], Enterococcus spp. [N = 1], and Streptococcus
of leptospirosis. pneumoniae [N = 1]), dengue fever (N = 4), murine typhus
Evaluation of IgM ELISA in healthy individuals. Serum (N = 4), melioidosis (N = 2), HIV-related infections (N = 2),
samples were obtained from 218 healthy blood donors other diagnoses (N = 6), and unknown diagnosis (N = 32).
residing in northeast Thailand and tested using the IgM The sensitivity and specificity of IgM ELISA were deter-
ELISA to evaluate background seropositivity. To determine mined using culture and/or MAT positivity as the gold stan-
the reference range for this population, IgM Panbio units were dard. The diagnostic accuracy of the ELISA based on testing
log transformed so that data was normally distributed, and the paired (acute and convalescent) sera and using a positive
reference range then calculated using the geometric mean and result on admission and/or during follow-up was deter-
range values (geometric mean ± 2 SD). mined using the manufacturer’s cutoff of > 11 Panbio units.
Statistical analysis. Statistical analyses were performed The sensitivity and specificity of paired serum samples were
using STATA/SE version 11.2 (College Station, TX). 90.8% (95% CI = 83.8–95.5) and 55.1% (95% CI = 45.2–64.6),
Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the IgM ELISA was respectively (Table 1). Recalculation of these using results
defined against the combined result for culture and MAT from the admission sample only gave a sensitivity and
(a positive result of either or both being interpreted as specificity of 52.3% (95% CI = 42.5–62.1) and 66.4%
diagnostic for leptospirosis), and expressed as a proportion (95% CI = 56.6–75.2), respectively.
with exact 95% confidence interval (CI). The Fisher’s exact A ROC curve analysis was performed using results based
test was used to compare categorical variables, and the Mann- on paired sera, which demonstrated an area under the curve
Whitney test was used to compare continuous variables. The of 0.85 (95% CI = 0.79–0.89). From this, an optimal cutoff was
optimal cutoff value of IgM ELISA was determined using estimated to be ³ 20 Panbio units. This gave an accurate clas-
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.13 Median sification in 79.4% of patients compared with 72.5% if the low
time to positivity of IgM ELISA in leptospirosis cases was cutoff value was used (Figure 1). Using this higher cutoff value,
estimated by survival analysis. This analysis was censored for the sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA on paired sera
loss to follow-up. were 76.1% (95% CI = 67.0–83.8) and 82.6% (95% CI = 74.1–
Ethical statement. The study protocol was approved by the 89.2), respectively, and those on admission were 30.8% (95%
Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Public Health, Royal CI = 22.2–40.5) and 90.7% (95% CI = 83.5–95.4), respectively.
TABLE 1
Sensitivities and specificities of Panbio IgM ELISA for the diagnosis of leptospirosis*
Gold standard result† % (95% CI)
Cutoff value Sample timing Positive (+) or negative (–) result + – Sensitivity Specificity
and control. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/ Phongmany S, Keolouangkot V, White NJ, Day NP, Newton PN,
WHO_CDS_CSR_EPH_2002.23.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2010. 2006. Limited diagnostic capacities of two commercial assays
5. Wuthiekanun V, Chierakul W, Limmathurotsakul D, Smythe LD, for the detection of Leptospira immunoglobulin M antibodies
Symonds ML, Dohnt MF, Slack AT, Limpaiboon R, in Laos. Clin Vaccine Immunol 13: 1166–1169.
Suputtamongkol Y, White NJ, Day NP, Peacock SJ, 2007. 10. Wagenaar JF, Falke TH, Nam NV, Binh TQ, Smits HL, Cobelens
Optimization of culture of Leptospira from humans with lep- FG, de Vries PJ, 2004. Rapid serological assays for leptospirosis
tospirosis. J Clin Microbiol 45: 1363–1365. are of limited value in southern Vietnam. Ann Trop Med
6. Ooteman MC, Vago AR, Koury MC, 2006. Evaluation of MAT, Parasitol 98: 843–850.
IgM ELISA and PCR methods for the diagnosis of human lep- 11. Effler PV, Bogard AK, Domen HY, Katz AR, Higa HY, Sasaki
tospirosis. J Microbiol Methods 65: 247–257. DM, 2002. Evaluation of eight rapid screening tests for acute
7. Winslow WE, Merry DJ, Pirc ML, Devine PL, 1997. Evaluation of leptospirosis in Hawaii. J Clin Microbiol 40: 1464–1469.
a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detec- 12. Thaipadungpanit J, Chierakul W, Wuthiekanun V, Limmathurotsakul
tion of immunoglobulin M antibody in diagnosis of human lep- D, Amornchai P, Boonslip S, Smythe LD, Limpaiboon R,
tospiral infection. J Clin Microbiol 35: 1938–1942. Hoffmaster AR, Day NP, Peacock SJ, 2011. Diagnostic accuracy
8. Zochowski WJ, Palmer MF, Coleman TJ, 2001. An evaluation of of real-time PCR assays targeting 16S rRNA and lipl32 genes
three commercial kits for use as screening methods for the for human leptospirosis in Thailand: a case-control study. PLoS
detection of leptospiral antibodies in the UK. J Clin Pathol 54: ONE 6: e16236.
25–30. 13. Zweig MH, Campbell G, 1993. Receiver-operating characteristic
9. Blacksell SD, Smythe L, Phetsouvanh R, Dohnt M, Hartskeerl R, (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medi-
Symonds M, Slack A, Vongsouvath M, Davong V, Lattana O, cine. Clin Chem 39: 561–577.