Classic Experiments: Origin of Life Forms: Spontaneous Generation
Classic Experiments: Origin of Life Forms: Spontaneous Generation
Classic Experiments: Origin of Life Forms: Spontaneous Generation
Life Forms
Spontaneous Generation
It was once believed that life
could come from nonliving
things, such as mice from corn,
flies from bovine manure,
maggots from rotting meat, and
fish from the mud of previously
dry lakes.
Spontaneous generation is
the incorrect hypothesis that
nonliving things are capable of
producing life.
Several experiments have
been conducted to disprove
spontaneous generation.
Redi's Experiment and
Needham's Rebuttal
In 1668, Francesco Redi, an
Italian scientist, designed a
scientific experiment to test the
spontaneous creation of
maggots by placing fresh meat
in each of two different jars.
One jar was left open; the other
was covered with a cloth. Days
later, the open jar contained
maggots, whereas the covered
jar contained no maggots. He
did note that maggots were
found on the exterior surface of
the cloth that covered the jar.
Redi successfully
demonstrated that the maggots
came from fly eggs and thereby
helped to disprove
spontaneous generation.
Needham’s Experiment
In England, John Needham
challenged Redi's findings by
conducting an experiment in
which he placed a broth, or
“gravy,” into a bottle, heated
the bottle to kill anything inside,
then sealed it. Days later, he
reported the presence of life in
the broth and announced that
life had been created from
nonlife.
In actuality, he did not heat it
long enough to kill all the
microbes.
Spallanzani's Experiment
Lazzaro Spallanzani, also an
Italian scientist, reviewed both
Redi's and Needham's data
and experimental design and
concluded that perhaps
Needham's heating of the
bottle did not kill everything
inside.
He constructed his own
experiment by placing broth in
each of two separate bottles,
boiling the broth in both bottles,
then sealing one bottle and
leaving the other open. Days
later, the unsealed bottle was
teeming with small living things
that he could observe more
clearly with the newly invented
microscope. The sealed bottle
showed no signs of life. This
certainly excluded spontaneous
generation as a viable theory.
Except it was noted by
scientists of the day that
Spallanzani had deprived the
closed bottle of air, and it was
thought that air was necessary
for spontaneous generation. So
although his experiment was
successful, a strong rebuttal
blunted his claims.
Pasteur's Experiment
Louis Pasteur, the notable
French scientist, accepted the
challenge to re-create the
experiment and leave the
system open to air.
He subsequently designed
several bottles with S-curved
necks that were oriented
downward so gravity would
prevent access by airborne
foreign materials. He placed a
nutrient-enriched broth in one
of the goose-neck bottles,
boiled the broth inside the
bottle, and observed no life in
the jar for one year. He then
broke off the top of the bottle,
exposing it more directly to the
air, and noted life-forms in the
broth within days. He noted
that as long as dust and other
airborne particles were trapped
in the S-shaped neck of the
bottle, no life was created until
this obstacle was removed. He
reasoned that the
contamination came from life-
forms in the air.
Pasteur finally convinced the
learned world that even if
exposed to air, life did not arise
from nonlife.