Analysis of Stress Field in Al O - Zro Biomaterials by Finite Element Method
Analysis of Stress Field in Al O - Zro Biomaterials by Finite Element Method
To cite this article: S. Laasri, M. Es-Sadik, M. Taha, A. Laghzizil, E.K. Hlil & A. Hajjaji (2016)
Analysis of stress field in Al2O3-ZrO2 biomaterials by finite element method, Molecular Crystals and
Liquid Crystals, 627:1, 141-147, DOI: 10.1080/15421406.2015.1137130
Article views: 27
Download by: [University of Sydney Library] Date: 27 November 2017, At: 19:34
MOL. CRYST. LIQ. CRYST.
, VOL. , –
http://dx.doi.org/./..
ABSTRACT KEYWORDS
We present an investigation of the mechanical properties of Al2 O3 -ZrO2 Bioceramic; Al O /ZrO ;
as duplex-structured materials using the finite element method (FEM). Mechanic properties; Finite
The creation of stress fields are a result of the material trying to dissipate element modelling; D
reconstruction
mechanical energy that is being exerted on the biomaterial. By finite ele-
ment modelling and the stress fields, as either compressive or tensile, we
can understand how inclusions interact with each other bioceramic lat-
tice containing alumina in the presence of different zirconia contents.
The stress fields can be applied to various strengthening mechanisms in
bioceramic. They can be created by adding several inclusions in alumina
lattice.
1. Introduction
Bioceramics became an accepted group of materials for medical applications, mainly for
implants in orthopaedics, maxillofacial surgery and for dental implants [1–3]. In the last years,
layered configurations have been studied as a structural option for improving the mechani-
cal behavior and reliability of ceramics. Presently, bioceramics have become a diverse class
of biomaterials including three basic types: (i) bioactive ceramics as calcium phosphate that
forms direct chemical bonded with bone or even with soft tissue of a living organism, (ii)
bioresorbable (bioglass and glass ceramics) ceramics that actively participate in the metabolic
processes of an organism, and (iii) bio-inert high strength ceramics such as alumina (Al2 O3 )
and zirconia (ZrO2 ). Zirconia is a most used biomaterial that has a higher mechanical strength
and fracture toughness, while alumina is the most studied material for the implants develop-
ment considered as low-cost with easily manipulation. Besides, it is widely used on numerous
domains in particular in the orthopaedic applications. The combination of various bioceram-
ics with the development of partially stabilized zirconia and alumina is the part of biomateri-
als world becoming increasingly important in medical devises. The mechanical properties of
Al2 O3 -ZrO2 bioceramic materials are largely discussed [1–4]. Contrary to alumina ceramic,
the zirconia is a very interesting potential candidate for orthopaedic devices due to its excep-
tional mechanical properties such as the tenacity and fracture [1]. As disvantage, they can be
influence of crack position and length on the dynamic characteristics of inclusions have been
simulated and discussed. From such simulations, we are able to demonstrate that the crack
position and crack length affect the gear’s natural frequency as well as vibration shape.
2.2. Materials
The finite element modelling provides detailed information regarding the development of
stress fields associated with several inclusions. In this way, it becomes possible to analyze
the micro-cracks inside the Al2 O3 bio-ceramic. The modelling conditions are: (a) Matrix
in alumina, (b) Inclusion of Al2 O3 +x%.ZrO2 (noted AZx ), (c) The inclusion effect on the
matrix likened to an internal pressure with their values depends on the zirconia content in
the reinforcement zone, (d) The inter-inclusion distance depends on the inclusion percent-
age in matrix volume, (e) The mechanical and geometrical properties are taken according to
those reported by Lutz et al. [11–12].
B), [αA andαB ] are thermal dilatation coefficients of A and B spheres, respectively. The [T ]
is the temperature deviation in the considered conditions.
The pressure with the interface inclusion-matrix is expressed as:
B 3
r
Piso = −C. 1 − A
B
(1)
r
Where
1/2EA .EB .εV
C= 3
2EA .(1 − 2νB ) + EB (1 + νA ) + [2.EB .(1 − 2νA ) − EA (1 − 2νB )]( RRB )
A
With (EA and EB ), (VA and VB ) and (RA and RB ) are the Young’s Modulus, Poisson coefficients
and inter-inclusion for A and B, respectively.
The spherical inclusion effect is compared to an internal pressure that its value depends on
the zirconia content in each inclusion. The figure 3 shows the scheme for the used geometrical
matrix for internal pressure calculations.
According to the conditions considered by Lutz [13], the calculated pressures for optimum
Al2 O3 -x%ZrO2 ceramics are reported in figure 4.This internal pressure decreases when the
RB /RA ratio increases. However, this pressure also increases with zirconia content such as
reported elsewhere [15].Then, we conclude that Al2 O3 -35%ZrO2 bioceramic is considered as
the most selected zirconia content in view of suitable rupture with lower internal pressure
than 1000 MPa [14].
From finite element construction applied on the quadratic system at four nodes, the figure 5
shows the internal pressure effect on the cylindrical plate, which confirms that the pressure
field is radial with an increase of the principal constraint with ZrO2 content such as reported
elsewhere [1–3].Consequently, the reinforcement in ceramic containing alumina and zirco-
nia compounds is related to the interaction between the stress field in frontal crack and the
residual stress fields around spherical inclusions. However, the elastic energy stored around
the spherical zones should not exceed the propagation energy of cracks [16]. Based on Sels-
ing and Lundin models, Lutz [11] calculated the radial and tangential constraints around
spherical inclusions. He considers that the duplex structure includes a spherical and dense
MOL. CRYST. LIQ. CRYST. 145
Figure . Internal pressures for Al O -x%wt.ZrO inclusion as the function of RB /RA .
Downloaded by [University of Sydney Library] at 19:34 27 November 2017
implement, which wrap other small sphere B (Figure 1b).From results computed by the finite
element method (Figure 6) applied to 65% Al2 O3 -35%ZrO2 ceramic, the first stress field is
very intense in frontal inclusion and decreases quickly towards zero value in extreme cases of
the cylindrical plate. Additionally, this stress field decreases by increasing the inclusion size.
From this result point of view, we consider that a good correlation with results given by the
continuous fluid dynamics is established.
Figure . Distribution of the st principal constraints as the function RB /RA for the case or inclusion is made
up of % from Al O and % of ZrO (AZ).
146 S. LAASRI ET AL.
To solve the created stress field around a number of spherical inclusions by finite element
method, the inter-inclusion distance was varied to amplify ceramic matrix during the defor-
mation in alumina ceramic with the presence of hot working zirconia. Therefore, the mor-
phology of inclusions in wrought ceramics is largely controlled by their mechanical behavior
during the thermal processing. To simplify this investigation, the scattered network of inclu-
sions by a squared regular matrix has been opted (Figure 7).
Initially, we limited our calculations only to four inclusions dispersed at the tops of the ele-
mentary square. In this case, the internal pressure values also depend on the zirconia content
with 32 µm as inclusion diameter. The typical behaviors of different types of inclusions during
the deformation are schematically given in Figure 8.
From figure 8, we note that the reduction in inter-inclusions distance (black zones) involves
the increase in compression (blue network). So, in the restricted blue zone if the constraint
is low or almost zero, the deviation of a crack, which is propagated in the matrix will not
take place where the distance inter-inclusions is higher than 140 µm for the dispersion of
inclusions containing 65%Al2 O3 +35%ZrO2 in an alumina matrix.
Figure . Distribution of the first main stress field near of various inter-inclusion distances « d ». (a) d =
µm, (b) d= µm, (c), d = µm, (d) d = µm.
MOL. CRYST. LIQ. CRYST. 147
Figure 9 shows an example of a crack deviation propagated in one stamp out of alumina
containing spherical inclusions. The cracks are propagated in the zones of weak energies with
a deviation of the cracks induced by skirting of the black spherical zones and zones put in
Downloaded by [University of Sydney Library] at 19:34 27 November 2017
4. Conclusion
We have used the finite element method to study the distribution of the principal stress fields
in Al2 O3 -ZrO2 matrix with several inclusions. Results show that the reinforcement is ensured
by the transformation of zirconia phase in the reinforcement zones. In addition, the principal
stress fields are influenced by the residual stress field around inclusions. This residual stress
field is very high at inclusion-matrix interface.
Consequently, the developed model led to optimize the inter-inclusion distance and allows
the crack deviation propagated in alumina matrix.
References
[1] Liu, G. J., Qiu, H. B., Todd, R., Brook, R. J., & Guo, J. K. (1998). Mat. Res. Bulletin, 33, 281–288.
[2] Claussen, N. (1976). J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 59, 49–51.
[3] Lee, B. T., Kang, I. C., Gain, A. K., Kim, K. H., & Song, H. Y. (2006). Journal of the European
Ceramic Society, 26, 3525–3530.
[4] Basu, D., Das Gupta, A., Basu, M. K., & Sakar, B. K. (1996). J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 16, 613–617.
[5] Lutz, H. E., & Claussen, N. (1991). J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 7, 219–226.
[6] Claussen, N., Steeb, J., & Pabst, R. F. (1977). J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 56, 559–562.
[7] Claussen, N., Ruhle, M., & Heuer, A. H. (1984). In Science & Technology of Zirconia II, American
Ceramic Society, Columbus, 64–77.
[8] http://www-cast3m.cea.fr/
[9] Yu, T., Liu, X., Ye, J., & Zhang, M. (2014). Ceramics International, 40, 2933–2942.
[10] Han, X. (2015). Modelling Degradation of Bioresorbable Polymeric Medical Devices, 113–130, 131–
140.
[11] Lutz, H. E., & Swain, M. V. (1992). J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 75, 1729–1736.
[12] Lutz, H. E., Swain, M. V., & Claussen, N. (1991). J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 74, 19–24.
[13] Lutz, H. E., & Claussen, N. (1991). J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 7, 209–218.
[14] Taha, M. (1993). Elaboration et caractérisation de poudres de zircones, Thesis, INSA-Lyon France.
[15] Laasri, S., Taha, M., Hlil, E. K., & Hajjaji, A. (2011). C. R. Mecanique, 339, 35–41.
[16] Olagnon, C., Chevalier, J., & Pauchard, V. (2006). Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 26,
3051–3059.