Acute Coronary Syndromes - M. Brizzio (Intech, 2012) WW PDF
Acute Coronary Syndromes - M. Brizzio (Intech, 2012) WW PDF
Acute Coronary Syndromes - M. Brizzio (Intech, 2012) WW PDF
SYNDROMES
Edited by Mariano E. Brizzio
Acute Coronary Syndromes
Edited by Mariano E. Brizzio
Published by InTech
Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
As for readers, this license allows users to download, copy and build upon published
chapters even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly
credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications.
Notice
Statements and opinions expressed in the chapters are these of the individual contributors
and not necessarily those of the editors or publisher. No responsibility is accepted for the
accuracy of information contained in the published chapters. The publisher assumes no
responsibility for any damage or injury to persons or property arising out of the use of any
materials, instructions, methods or ideas contained in the book.
Preface IX
This book has been written with the intention of providing an up-to-the minute review
of acute coronary syndromes. Atherosclerotic coronary disease is still a leading cause
of death within developed countries and not surprisingly, is significantly rising in
others. Over the past decade the treatment of these syndromes has changed
dramatically. The introduction of novel therapies has impacted the outcomes and
surviving rates in such a way that the medical community need to be up to date
almost on a “daily bases”.
It is hoped that this book will provide a timely update on acute coronary syndromes
and prove to be an invaluable resource for practitioners seeking new and innovative
ways to deliver the best possible care to their patients.
Mariano E. Brizzio, MD
Editor in Chief
The Valley Heart and Vascular Institute, Ridgewood, New Jersey
USA
1
1. Introduction
Platelet activity has a very important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis disease. In
addition to being part of the coagulation system, they contribute to all phases of the
atherosclerosis process (1) The “intervention” in the platelet activity has been played a
central role in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) (2).
Aspirin is considered the foundation antiplatelet therapy for patients at risk of
cardiovascular events. However, in the last few decades many different agents were
introduced to have a more effective antiplatelet action and improve treatment outcomes in
coronary syndromes.
In this chapter you will find a systematic review of all the antiplatelet agents available:
mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, side effects, evidence of effectiveness and their use
in clinical settings. A special emphasizes will point out agents that are in investigational
stage and what are the future perspectives.
agent used and proven to be effective to reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction and
stroke in many high risk vascular patients (2).The recurrence of vascular events in
patients treated with aspirin alone ranges between 10 – 20% within five years of the initial
event (2-7).
Aspirin is effective by blocking the synthesis of TXa2, a powerful platelet activator.
In the last decade, the thienopyridines such as clopidogrel have been used to improve
outcomes in the treatment of ACS. This anti-platelet agent irreversibly blocks the P2Y12
receptor, precluding the platelet activation by ADP (2). Its anti-platelet mechanism of action
clearly differs from aspirin. In the majority of cardiovascular patients the combination of
clopidogrel and aspirin has additive beneficial effects when compared with clopidogrel or
aspirin alone (8). Clopidogrel also has some limitations, which have prompted the
development of newer anti-platelet agents which interact at different sites of the coagulation
cascade.
The following figure reflects the site of action of the common antiplatelet agents (figure 1)
prevents the conformational change of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa which allows platelet binding
to fibrinogen (13). It is used in patients in whom aspirin is not tolerated, or in whom dual
anti-platelet therapy is desirable (in combination with Aspirin). Because it has been
reported to increase the risk of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and
neutropenia, its use has largely been supplanted by the newer drug, clopidogrel, which is
felt to have a much lower hematologic risk (14).
Prasugrel, a novel thienopyryridine was approved for clinical use in the USA by the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2010. Unlike clopidogrel, which undergoes a two-step,
CYP450-dependent conversion to its active metabolite, prasugrel only requires single-step
activation. Prasugrel is a more potent platelet inhibitor with faster action and inhibition.
Also, it has been estimated that due to its “easy metabolism” its genetic resistance is less
likely (15). In other words, prasugrel has a significantly lower incidence of hypo-
responsiveness in comparison with clopidogrel (15). However, the risks of bleeding in these
patients are greater than clopidogrel (16).
Ticagrelor is the most novel class of anti-platelet drugs, the cyclopentytriazolopyrimides,
which also inhibit the P2Y12 receptor as the thienopyryridines. However, it has a simpler
and faster metabolism (rapid onset of action) high potency and most importantly
reversibility (17). The latter, makes this drug safer in regards of bleeding complications.
Cangrelor, an ATP analog, is an investigational intravenous anti-platelet drug. This agent
has biphasic elimination and possesses the advantages of high potency, very fast onset of
action and very fast reversibility after the discontinuation (16).This gives a considerable
advantage over other ADP antagonist in patients who might need immediate surgery.
However, after initial treatment, patients who received intravenous infusion of Cangrelor
often require continued treatment with one of the oral P2Y12 antagonists, something that
one must take into consideration (16).
halted for patients with stroke and mild heart conditions due to safety reasons. It is unknown
if it will continue.
8. Conclusions
Antiplatelet therapy plays a crucial role in the treatment of coronary patients. The continuous
introduction of new agents is geared to improve results in patient ongoing percutaneous
coronary interventions. However, the side effects of theses should be monitored closely. In
the end, the ideal management of patients with acute coronary syndrome should be to be a
collaborative effort between cardiologist and surgeons to assure the best outcomes possible.
9. References
[1] Hoffman M et al.Activated factor VII activates Factor IX on the surfaces of activated
platelets. Blood Coag Fibrinolyis. 1998:9; 61-65.
[2] Antithrombotic triallist’s collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials
of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infartion, and stroke in
high risk patients. BMJ 2002;324:71-86
[3] Heemskerk JW. Funtion of glycoprotein VI and intgrelin in the procoagulant response of
single, collagen-adherent platelets. Throm Hemost 1999;81:782-792
[4] Jin, J, Kunapuli, SP. Coactivation of two different G protein-coupled receptors is
essential for ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
1998;95:8070-74
[5] Heechler B, et al. The P2Y1 receptor in necessary for adenosine 5’-diphodphate-induced
platelet aggregation. Blood 1998;92:152-159
[6] Brizzio, ME, Shaw, RE, Bosticco B, et al. Use of an Objective Tool to Assess Platelet
Inhibition Prior to Off-Pump Coronary Surgery to Reduce Blood Usage and Cost.
Journ Interv Cardiol. 2011 In press
[7] de Werf F et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients. Euro Heart J . 2007:9:D3-
D9 MC,
[8] Metha SR, Peters RJG, Bertrand ME, et al., for the Clopidrogel in Unstable angina to
prevent Recurrent events (CURE) Trial Investigators. Effects of pretreatment with
clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing
percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-Cure study. Lancet 2001;358:527-33.
[9] Halkes PH, van Gijn J, Kappelle LJ, Koudstaal PJ, Algra A (May 2006). "Aspirin plus
dipyridamole versus aspirin alone after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin
(ESPRIT): randomised controlled trial". Lancet.2006; 367: 1665–73.
[10] Sprigg N, Gray LJ, England T, et al. (2008). Berger, Jeffrey S.. ed. "A randomised
controlled trial of triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel and
6 Acute Coronary Syndromes
1. Introduction
Seeing is believing, but the reverse, namely, disbelieving the unseen may often go against
the spirit of scientific exploration. This is particularly true for nano-scale objects
interacting almost invisibly with biological cells, tissues or organs. Interestingly many of
the biological sub-cellular components (e.g. proteins, DNA)have nano-scale dimension.
The apparently innocent (chemically inactive) and tiny particulate matter originating from
various natural or artificial sources (e.g., pollutant) have been shown to be toxic at
different physiological levels. The famous saying by Jeevaka, the legendary physician of
the Jataka tales, that there is no herb in the world that is not a drug, however follows.
What is toxic in some context have important therapeutic value elsewhere. Nanoparticles
do interfere with the thrombo-static equilibrium. While this shift on one hand is a matter
of concern, it may provide us a tool to handle or diagnose diseases in which such
equilibrium is shifted. One of the finest models to test this dual aspect of the nano-scale
objects is Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), a leading cause of death in the global
scenario. What is known today regarding the effect of nanoscale objects may really be a
tip of iceberg and with the advent of smarter nanoparticles one may think of more
versatile use of nanotechnology in the management of ACS.
Granules occur as i) dense granules (δ), ii) alpha granules (α). Dense granules mainly
contains ATP, ADP, serotonin etc., whereas alpha granules contain fibronectin, fibrinogen,
platelet activation factor (PAF) etc. (Marcus et al, 1966; Flaumenhaft et al, 2005). Ca++, one of
the most important factors for platelet action, is stored in endoplasmic reticulum and
released into the cytoplasm, during platelet activation (Nesbitt et al, 2003). Open canalicular
system (OCS) is a channel like protrusion inside the platelet where granules release their
contents (Escolar & White, 1991). Recently role of mRNA and mi-RNA has been shown to
play important roles in platelet aggregation (Calverley et al, 2010; Rowley et al, 2011;
Nagalla et al, 2011).
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of platelet activation and aggregation. In the resting conditions
platelets, maintain their discoid form and flow in circulation. Upon injury, platelets become
exposed to sub-endothelial collagen and vWf (1) adhered on it (2). This is followed by
activation and shape changes (3). The next phase is granules release and secondary phase
aggregation (4) and lastly the stable platelet plaque forms(5).
The detailed mechanism of platelet function depends on the complex intracellular signalling
pathways. This leads to platelet activation by simulating a series of physiological events.
Briefly, after binding of agonists, the corresponding receptors trigger downstream signalling
cascades and initiates Ca++ mobilisation from endoplasmic reticulum. Platelet granules
release (α and δ), platelet shape change and the thromboxane A2 (TXA2) production then
follows. The cumulative effects of these events initiate activation of fibrinogen receptor
(GPIIbIIIa) and triggering of primary phase aggregation. The released granules-content
(ADP, ATP etc.) along with TXA2 activate other resting platelets resulting the secondary
phase aggregation (Kroll & Schafer, 1989; Ashby, 1990) (figure 3). The important signalling
molecules that help the above process through a complex interplay among different G-
protein coupled receptors, integrin receptors, second messengers, kinases, phosphatise and
Ca++ mobilisation etc (Dorsam & Kunapuli, 2004; Wu e al., 2006,2010; Roberts et al.,2004;
Karniguian et al., 1990; Farndale, 2006; Spalding et al., 1998; Patscheke , 1980; Clifford et al.,
1998; Hoffman et. al. 2009).
10 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of agonists induced platelet activation. Binding of agonists with
corresponding receptors, triggers downstream signalling cascade, and causes mobilisation
of intracellular Ca++. The initial Ca++ flux branches itself into three major signalling events:
A (alpha and dense granules release), B (platelet shape change), C (TXA2 production). The
three signalling events cumulatively determine the activation and aggregation. The released
chemicals (ADP,ATP etc) from granules and the TXA2, further activates other resting
platelets and initiates the secondary phase of aggregation.
Thrombotic Inception at Nano-Scale 11
Table 1. List of anti-platelet drugs – their mode of action and generic names. The most
common drugs are described in the first two rows.
Fig. 5. Target sites for anti-platelet drugs in platelet signalling pathway- different
downstream signalling pathways are shown. The drug targets described in Table 1 are
represented by the corresponding numbers (see text for elaboration).
Thrombotic Inception at Nano-Scale 13
3. Nano-interface
Nanotechnology has the potential to interfere with basic biological mechanisms because of
their tunable electrical, magnetic and optical properties, and small size ( Chen et al., 2005;
Gobin et al., 2007; Fu et al., 2007). This tunability makes them potential tool in diagnostics
(e.g. bio-imaging) therapy and a smart combination of both of these properties (Smith et al.,
2008; Peng et al., 2000; Li et al., 2003; Murry et al., 2000).
Some of advancement of nanotechnology inspired application include improved imaging
contrast agents by SPIONS (super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles), targeted
delivery of drugs, molecular chaperons and agents to kill specific cancer cells (Yu et al.,
2011; Petkar et al., 2011; Patra et al., 2007). Another exclusive application involve magnetic
induction (radio frequency) heating or laser induced heating of designer particles, with
desirable material and shape attributes (Peterman et al., 2003; Plech et al., 2004). The
hyperthermic killing of tumor cells, is one of the most important examples (Rao et al.,
2010; Huff et al., 2007). The recently reported chaperon properties of nanoparticles can
also have important biomedical potential (Singha et al., 2010). Interestingly there are only
few report on haematological (Elias & Tsourkas 2009; Baker, 2009; Walkey et al., 2009;
Wickline et al., 2005) and cardiological applications (Lanza et al., 2006; Iverson et al., 2008)
of nanotechnology.
EFFECT ON
TYPE OF NANOMATERIALS
PLATELETS
Carbon nanoparticle (C60) Inert
Standard urban particulate matter Activation
Carbon NP Multiwall carbon nanotube Activation
Single wall carbon nanotube Activation
Mixed carbon nanotube Activation
Gold nanoparticle Activation
Iron nanoparticle Activation
Cupper nanoparticle Activation
Metallic NP Cadmium sulphide nanoparticle Activation
Cadmium sulphide nanorod Activation
Quantum dots Activation
Silver nanoparticle Anti-platelet effect
Short collagen related peptide Activation
Amidine White Polystyrine Latex NP(+ve) Activation
Aminated Polystyrine Latex NP (+ve) Activation
Carboxylated Polystyrine Latex NP (-ve ) Activation
Unmodified Polystyrine Latex NP Inert
Polymer NP
PNIPAAM Inert
and
PEG coated PNIPAAM Inert
Bio- derived
poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) Inert
NP
Chitosan nanoparticles Inert
Human and Bovine derived NP Anti-platelet effect
Hydroxyapatite Anti-platelet effect
E78 NPs Anti-platelet effect
PEG coated E78 NPs Anti-platelet effect
Ultra fine particles Activation
Aerosol
Ambient Particulate Matter Activation
Table 2. Nanoparticle effects on platelets – the Table enlists how the platelet response varies
with variation in nano-material as well as the corresponding nano-surface configuration. NP
is nanoparticle.
As mentioned earlier, anti-platelet drug therapy is the most important therapeutic regime
for ACS patients. A major fall-out of the conventional therapeutic approach is the sizable
incidence of drug resistance among ACS patients (Guha et al., 2009; Jogns et al., 2006;
Michelson et al., 2006). There are indications that nanotechnology can help diagnosis of drug
resistance (Deb et. al. 2011).
Again, metallic nanoparticles can induce platelet aggregation depending on the
physiological state of the platelets. For a given nano-drug such response can show inter
individual variations, and there is evidently a scope of judging the safety of such drugs
depending on the extent of induced alteration in platelet function. It may be important to
note that under certain conditions nanoparticles can be hazardous to both normal
individuals as well as ACS patients. Table 3 summarises the overall ACS risk associated
with nanoparticles :
circulation (Yamawaki & Iwai, 2006). Thus, smaller nanoparticles pose a higher risk in the
ACS scenario.
Fig. 7. Nanoparticle Size Response. Gold Nanoparticle induced platelet response [see Deb et.
al. 2007,2011] is dependent on nanoparticle size, smaller particle showing aggregatory effects.
Though the exact molecular mechanism of metallic-nanoparticle platelet interaction is yet to
be established, systemic response like release of platelet granules (both α and δ) have been
observed in presence of nano-particles. In presence of apyrase (scavenge ADP released from
δ granules), or anti-platelet drug clopidogrel (block P2Y12 purinergic receptors, thus inhibit
secondary wave of aggregation, which is the signature of granules release) nano-particle
induced aggregation inhibited. In presence of Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser (RGDS) (a tetra-peptide,
which binds to fibrinogen receptor GpIIbIIIa, mimicking the anti-platelet drug Reo-Pro),
nano induced platelet aggregation is again inhibited. This reflects that nanoparticles
induced aggregation is not due to any physico-chemical agglomerate formation.
Consequently, metallic nano-forms are unlikely to activate platelets from patients under
anti-platelet drug therapy (Deb et al., 2011). Alternatively, conjugation of anti-platelet drugs
(or combined administration of such drugs) can help to reduce the thrombotic risk of
nanoparticle based drug formulation.
18 Acute Coronary Syndromes
release, inhibit platelet aggregation. This paradox is possibly due to the reduction of
platelet-platelet interaction in presence of nanoparticle (Miller et al., 2009). Negatively
charged Polyethylene glycol (PEG) coated nanoparticles from Microemulsion precursor
(PEG-E78) induces platelet inhibition (Koziara et al., 2005). Importantly, in both pro-
aggregatory or antiplatelet responses , the nanoparticles are effective inducer when added in
the pre-incubation stage. Neither the inhibition nor the aggregatory response are observed
once the aggregation is initiated by an agonist (Koziara et al., 2005; Deb et al. 2007, 2010).
Similar argument holds good for anti-platelet effect of silver nanoparticles prepared with a
certain surface attributes (Shrivastava et al., 2009). Silver nanoparticles with a different
surface conjugations again show pro-aggregatory effects (Deb et al., 2011 (in press)).
Fig. 8. Nanosensor for Drug Resistance in ACS [89]-Using Nanoparticle effect to discriminate
between responder and non-responder of antiplatelet drugs (e.g. aspirin and clopidogrel).
The important question that crops up here is whether in the platelet context it is the nano-
surface conjugation or the nano-material that play the lead role. It follows that by modulating
20 Acute Coronary Syndromes
the nano-surface, one can tune the thrombotic level, the desirable level depending on the
patient status. For ACS, the desired state is a nanoform that attenuates the aggregatory
response, and in case of hemorrhage the situation may be complimentary in nature.
6. References
Aragam KG, Bhatt DL. Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes.J Cardiovasc
Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Mar;16(1):24-42. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
Arnida, Malugin A, Ghandehari H. Cellular uptake and toxicity of gold nanoparticles in
prostate cancer cells: a comparative study of rods and spheres.J Appl Toxicol. 2010
Apr;30(3):212-7.
Ashby B, Daniel JL, Smith JB. Mechanisms of platelet activation and inhibition.Hematol
Oncol Clin North Am. 1990 Feb;4(1):1-26.
Badran HM, Elnoamany MF, Khalil TS, Eldin MM.Age-related alteration of risk profile,
inflammatory response, and angiographic findings in patients with acute coronary
syndrome.Clin Med Cardiol. 2009 Feb 18;3:15-28.
Baker JR Jr. Dendrimer-based nanoparticles for cancer therapy.Hematology Am Soc
Hematol Educ Program. 2009:708-19.
Born G, Patrono C.Antiplatelet drugs.Br J Pharmacol. 2006 Jan;147 Suppl 1:S241-51.
Calverley DC, Phang TL, Choudhury QG, Gao B, Oton AB, Weyant MJ, Geraci MW.
Significant downregulation of platelet gene expression in metastatic lung
cancer.Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Oct;3(5):227-32.
Cejas MA, Chen C, Kinney WA, Maryanoff BE. Nanoparticles that display short collagen-
related peptides. Potent stimulation of human platelet aggregation by triple helical
motifs.Bioconjug Chem. 2007 Jul-Aug;18(4):1025-7. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
Chen J, Saeki F, Wiley BJ, Cang H, Cobb MJ, Li ZY, Au L, Zhang H, Kimmey MB, Li X, Xia
Y. Gold nanocages: bioconjugation and their potential use as optical imaging
contrast agents. Nano Lett. 2005 Mar;5(3):473-7.
Chen Z, Meng H, Xing G, Yuan H, Zhao F, Liu R, Chang X, Gao X, Wang T, Jia G, Ye C, Chai
Z, Zhao Y. Age-related differences in pulmonary and cardiovascular responses to
SiO2 nanoparticle inhalation: nanotoxicity has susceptible population. Environ Sci
Technol. 2008 Dec 1;42(23):8985-92.
Chithrani BD, Ghazani AA, Chan WC. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold
nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells.Nano Lett. 2006 Apr;6(4):662-8.
Clifford EE, Parker K, Humphreys BD, Kertesy SB, Dubyak GR.The P2X1 receptor, an
adenosine triphosphate-gated cation channel, is expressed in human platelets but
not in human blood leukocytes.Blood. 1998 May 1;91(9):3172-81.
Deb S, Chatterjee M, Bhattacharya J, Lahiri P, Chaudhuri U, Pal Choudhuri S, Kar S,
Siwache O P, Sen P, Dasgupta A K.Role of purinergic receptors in platelet-
nanoparticle interactions.Nanotoxicology 2007. 1:93-103.
Deb S, Patra HK, Lahiri P, Dasgupta AK, Chakrabarti K, Chaudhuri U. Multistability in
platelets and their response to gold nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2011 Feb 26.
[Epub ahead of print]
Deb S, Dasgupta AK. One step nanosensor for single and multidrug resistance in acute
coronary syndrome (acs).Pub No: US 2011/0053172 A1
Deb S, Raja SO, Dasgupta AK, Sarkar R, Chattopadhyay AP, Chaudhuri U, Guha P, Sardar
P. Surface tunability of nanoparticles in modulating platelet functions. Blood Cells,
Molecules, and Diseases. 2011 [in press].
Thrombotic Inception at Nano-Scale 21
Decie and Lewis. Practical Heamatology. 9th edition. Edited by S M Lewis, B J Bain, I Bates.
Chapter 16 - Investigation of Haemostasis.
Dorsam RT, Kunapuli SP. Central role of the P2Y12 receptor in platelet activation.J Clin
Invest. 2004 Feb;113(3):340-5.
Elias A, Tsourkas A. Imaging circulating cells and lymphoid tissues with iron oxide
nanoparticles.Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2009:720-6.
Escolar G, White JG.The platelet open canalicular system: a final common pathway.Blood
Cells. 1991;17(3):467-85; discussion 486-95.
Farndale RW. Collagen-induced platelet activation.Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2006 Mar-
Apr;36(2):162-5. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
Faxon DP. Optimizing antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous
coronary intervention.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May 26. doi:
10.1002/ccd.23163. [Epub ahead of print]
Flaumenhaft R, Dilks JR, Rozenvayn N, Monahan-Earley RA, Feng D, Dvorak AM. The actin
cytoskeleton differentially regulates platelet alpha-granule and dense-granule
secretion. Blood. 2005 May 15;105(10):3879-87. Epub 2005 Jan 25.
Fu A, Gu W, Boussert B, Koski K, Gerion D, Manna L, Le Gros M, Larabell CA, Alivisatos
AP. Semiconductor quantum rods as single molecule fluorescent biological labels.
Nano Lett. 2007 Jan;7(1):179-82.
Geys J, Nemmar A, Verbeken E, Smolders E, Ratoi M, Hoylaerts MF, Nemery B, Hoet PH.
Acute toxicity and prothrombotic effects of quantum dots: impact of surface charge.
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Dec;116(12):1607-13. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
Gobin AM, Lee MH, Halas NJ, James WD, Drezek RA, West JL. Near-infrared resonant
nanoshells for combined optical imaging and photothermal cancer therapy. Nano
Lett. 2007 Jul;7(7):1929-34. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
Guha S, Mookerjee S, Guha P, Sardar P, Deb S, Roy PD, Karmakar R, Mani S, Hema MB,
Pyne S, Chakraborti P, Deb PK, Lahiri P, Chaudhuri U.Antiplatelet drug resistance
in patients with recurrent acute coronary syndrome undergoing conservative
management.Indian Heart J. 2009 Jul-Aug;61(4):348-52.
Guha S, Sardar P, Guha P, Deb S, Karmakar R, Chakraborti P, Mookerjee S, Deb PK, De R,
Dutta A, Chaudhuri U. Dual antiplatelet therapy in ACS: time-dependent variability
in platelet aggregation during the first week.Indian Heart J. 2009 Mar-Apr;61(2):173-7.
Guha S, Sardar P, Guha P, Roy S, Mookerjee S, Chakrabarti P, Deb PK, Chaudhuri U, Deb S,
Karmakar R, Dasgupta AK, Lahiri P.Dual antiplatelet drug resistance in patients
with acute coronary syndrome.Indian Heart J. 2009 Jan-Feb;61(1):68-73.
Gulati N, Rastogi R, Dinda AK, Saxena R, Koul V. Characterization and cell material
interactions of PEGylated PNIPAAM nanoparticles.Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces.
2010 Aug 1;79(1):164-73. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
Hoffman R, Edward J. Benz Jr et.al.Hematology Basic Principles and Practice. Edition 5.
Chapter116 - The Molecular Basis of Platelet Activation 2009.
Huff TB, Tong L, Zhao Y, Hansen MN, Cheng JX, Wei A.Hyperthermic effects of gold
nanorods on tumor cells.Nanomedicine (Lond). 2007 Feb;2(1):125-32.
Iverson N, Plourde N, Chnari E, Nackman GB, Moghe PV. Convergence of nanotechnology and
cardiovascular medicine : progress and emerging prospects.BioDrugs. 2008;22(1):1-10.
Johns A, Fisher M, Knappertz V. Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: an emerging clinical
entity.Eur Heart J. 2006 Jul;27(14):1754; author reply 1754-5. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
Karniguian A, Grelac F, Levy-Toledano S, Legrand YJ, Rendu F. Collagen-induced platelet
activation mainly involves the protein kinase C pathway. Biochem J. 1990 Jun
1;268(2):325-31.
22 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Nagalla S, Shaw C, Kong X, Kondkar AA, Edelstein LC, Ma L, Chen J, McKnight GS, López
JA, Yang L, Jin Y, Bray MS, Leal SM, Dong JF, Bray PF.Platelet microRNA-mRNA
coexpression profiles correlate with platelet reactivity.Blood. 2011 May
12;117(19):5189-97. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
Nemmar A, Hoylaerts MF, Hoet PH, Vermylen J, Nemery B. Size effect of intratracheally
instilled particles on pulmonary inflammation and vascular thrombosis. Toxicol
Appl Pharmacol. 2003 Jan 1;186(1):38-
Nesbitt WS, Giuliano S, Kulkarni S, Dopheide SM, Harper IS, Jackson SP. Intercellular
calcium communication regulates platelet aggregation and thrombus growth.J Cell
Biol. 2003 Mar 31;160(7):1151-61.
Nikolas Kipshidze.Nanotechnology in Cardiology.BULLETIN OF THE GEORGIAN
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES,2009, vol. 3, no. 165-177
Nyman D.Von Willebrand factor dependent platelet aggregation and adsorption of factor
VIII related antigen by collagen.Thromb Res. 1980 Jan 1-15;17(1-2):209-14.
Oberdörster G ,Stone V,Donaldson K. Toxicology of nanoparticles: A historical
perspective.Nanotoxicology 2007, 1, 2-25.
Patra HK, Banerjee S, Chaudhuri U, Lahiri P, Dasgupta AK. Cell selective response to gold
nanoparticles.Nanomedicine. 2007 Jun;3(2):111-9.
Patscheke H. Role of activation in epinephrine-induced aggregation of platelets.Thromb Res.
1980 Jan 1-15;17(1-2):133-42.
Patscheke H.Correlation of activation and aggregation of platelets. Discrimination between
anti-activating and anti-aggregating agents.Haemostasis. 1979;8(2):65-81.
Peng X, Manna L, Yang W, Wickham J, Scher E, Kadavanich A, Alivisatos AP. Shape control
of CdSe nanocrystals. Nature. 2000 Mar 2;404(6773):59-61.
Peterman EJ, Gittes F, Schmidt CF. Laser-induced heating in optical traps.Biophys J. 2003
Feb;84(2 Pt 1):1308-16.
Petkar KC, Chavhan SS, Agatonovik-Kustrin S, Sawant KK. Nanostructured materials in
drug and gene delivery: a review of the state of the art. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier
Syst. 2011;28(2):101-64.
Plech, A.; Kotaidis, V.; Grésillon, S.; Dahmen, C.; von Plessen, G. Laser-induced heating and
melting of gold nanoparticles studied by time-resolved x-ray scattering. Published
16 November 2004 (7 pages) 195423
Radomski A, Jurasz P, Alonso-Escolano D, Drews M, Morandi M, Malinski T, Radomski
MW . Nanoparticle-induced platelet aggregation and vascular thrombosis. British
journal of pharmacology 2005 ;146: 882–893
Ramtoola Z, Lyons P, Keohane K, Kerrigan SW, Kirby BP, Kelly JG. Investigation of the
interaction of biodegradable micro- and nanoparticulate drug delivery systems
with platelets.J Pharm Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;63(1):26-32. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-
7158.2010.01174.x. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
Rao W, Deng ZS, Liu J. A review of hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy/chemotherapy
on malignant tumors.Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2010;38(1):101-16.
Roberts DE, McNicol A, Bose R. Mechanism of collagen activation in human platelets. J Biol
Chem. 2004 May 7;279(19):19421-30. Epub 2004 Feb 23.
Rowley JW, Oler A, Tolley ND, Hunter B, Low EN, Nix DA, Yost CC, Zimmerman GA,
Weyrich AS.Genome wide RNA-seq analysis of human and mouse platelet
transcriptomes.Blood. 2011 May 19. [Epub ahead of print]
Rückerl R, Phipps RP, Schneider A, Frampton M, Cyrys J, Oberdörster G, Wichmann HE,
Peters A.Ultrafine particles and platelet activation in patients with coronary heart
disease--results from a prospective panel study.Part Fibre Toxicol. 2007 Jan 22;4:1.
24 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Shrivastava S, Bera T, Singh SK, Singh G. Ramachandrarao, P.; Dash, D.: Characterization of
antiplatelet properties of silver nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2009; 3:1357-1364.
Singha S, Datta H, Dasgupta AK. Size dependent chaperon properties of gold
nanoparticles.J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2010 Feb;10(2):826-32.
Smith AM, Mohs AM, Nie S. Tuning the optical and electronic properties of colloidal
nanocrystals by lattice strain. Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Jan;4(1):56-63. Epub 2008 Dec 7.
Spalding A, Vaitkevicius H, Dill S, MacKenzie S, Schmaier A, Lockette W. Mechanism of
epinephrine-induced platelet aggregation. Hypertension. 1998 Feb;31(2):603-7.
Thompson CB.From precursor to product: how do megakaryocytes produce platelets? Prog
Clin Biol Res. 1986;215:361-71.
Tschopp TB, Baumgartner HR, Meyer D. Antibody to human factor VIII/von Willebrand
factor inhibits collagen-induced platelet aggregation and release.Thromb Res. 1980
Jan 1-15;17(1-2):255-9.
Walkey C, Sykes EA, Chan WC. Application of semiconductor and metal nanostructures in
biology and medicine. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2009:701-7.
Wani M Y, Hashim M A, Nabi F, Malik M A. Nanotoxicity: Dimensional and Morphological
Concerns. Advances in Physical Chemistry. Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 450912,
15 pages. doi:10.1155/2011/450912
Wickline SA, Lanza GM. Nanotechnology for molecular imaging and targeted
therapy.Circulation. 2003 Mar 4;107(8):1092-5.
Wickline SA, Neubauer AM, Winter P, Caruthers S, Lanza G. Applications of
nanotechnology to atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.Arterioscler
Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006 Mar;26(3):435-41. Epub 2005 Dec 22.
Wilson DW, Aung HH, Lame MW, Plummer L, Pinkerton KE, Ham W, Kleeman M, Norris
JW, Tablin F.Exposure of mice to concentrated ambient particulate matter results in
platelet and systemic cytokine activation.Inhal Toxicol. 2010 Mar;22(4):267-76.
Wilson SR, Sabatine MS, Braunwald E, Sloan S, Murphy SA, Morrow DA. Detection of
myocardial injury in patients with unstable angina using a novel nanoparticle
cardiac troponin I assay: observations from the PROTECT-TIMI 30 Trial.Am Heart
J. 2009 Sep;158(3):386-91. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
Wiwanitkit V, Sereemaspun A, Rojanathanes R. Gold nanoparticles and a microscopic view
of platelets: a preliminary observation. Cardiovasc J Afr 2009 ; 20: 141-142.
Wu CC, Teng CM. Comparison of the effects of PAR1 antagonists, PAR4 antagonists, and
their combinations on thrombin-induced human platelet activation.Eur J
Pharmacol. 2006 Sep 28;546(1-3):142-7.
Wu CC, Wu SY, Liao CY, Teng CM, Wu YC, Kuo SC. The roles and mechanisms of PAR4
and P2Y12/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in maintaining thrombin-
induced platelet aggregation.Br J Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;161(3):643-58.
Yamawaki H, Iwai N. Mechanisms underlying nano-sized air-pollution-mediated
progression of atherosclerosis: carbon black causes cytotoxic injury/inflammation
and inhibits cell growth in vascular endothelial cells.Circ J. 2006 Jan;70(1):129-40.
Yamawaki H, Iwai N. Mechanisms underlying nano-sized air-pollution-mediated
progression of atherosclerosis: carbon black causes cytotoxic injury/inflammation
and inhibits cell growth in vascular endothelial cells.Circ J. 2006 Jan;70(1):129-40.
Yu MK, Kim D, Lee IH, So JS, Jeong YY, Jon S.Image-Guided Prostate Cancer Therapy Using
Aptamer-Functionalized Thermally Cross-Linked Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide
Nanoparticles.Small. 2011 Jun 7. doi: 10.1002/smll.201100472. [Epub ahead of print].
3
Physiopathology of the
Acute Coronary Syndromes
Iwao Emura
Department of Surgical Pathology, Japanese Red Cross Nagaoka Hospital,
Japan
1. Introduction
The widespread application of catheter-based interventions, and chronic treatment have
contributed to improved long-term prognosis in patients with acute ST-elevation
myocardial infarction (STEMI) 1-5. Despite these indisputable achievements, a large number
of individuals remain at substantial risk of severe first attack, recurrent disease and death.
Patients with unstable angina were classified into three groups according to short-term risk
of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction6, and the results of noninvasive tests and the
corresponding approximate mortality rates were reported 7.
Disruption, fissure, or erosion of an atherosclerotic plaque, with residual mural
thrombus (RMT) has a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of acute coronary
syndromes (ACS) 8-12. Most of occlusive thrombi had a layered structure indicating an
episodic growth by repeated mural deposits 13, 14. Morphological studies indicated that
plaque complications remained clinically silent days or weeks before the fatal event 15-18.
A RMT predisposes patients to recurrent thrombotic vessel occlusion 15, 16, 17, and plaque
disruption, fissure or erosion with thrombus contributes to plaque development and
progression 18. Therefore, a marker that predicts disrupted, fissured or eroded plaque
and the coronary thrombus may have practical clinical applications. The diagnosis of
these lesions has been tried by several methods 19. However, plaque disruption itself is
asymptomatic, and the associated RMT is usually clinically silent 20. To the best of our
knowledge, markers as a sign of a disrupted, fissured or eroded plaque and a coronary
thrombus are not available.
Scavenger receptor-mediated endocytosis of oxidized low-density lipoprotein by
macrophages has been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The differentiation
of scavenger receptor A negative (SRA-) monocytes in peripheral blood (PB) into SRA
positive (SRA+ ) macrophages was believed to take place in atherosclerotic lesions by
stimulation of macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) 21-24, and it was reported that
freshly isolated blood monocytes were negative for SRA 25. We surmised that plaque content
might be exposed to the blood stream after disruption of plaque, and SRA monocytes
-
Although several scavenger receptors, such as SRA, CD36, scavenger receptor-B1, CD68 and
Lox-1 have been shown to bind oxidized low-density lipoprotein, SRA and CD36 are
responsible for the preponderance of modified low-density lipoprotein uptake in
macrophages 26. In our study, we evaluated the utility of SRA, since SRA antigen is
restrictedly expressed on macrophages 26, but CD36 is expressed not only on macrophages
and monocytes but also on B lymphocytes.
We reported that the SRA index[number of SRA+ cells in 10 high power fields (HPF, ×400)
of peripheral blood (PB) smear, upper limit: <30] greater than 30 was considered to be a
useful indication of disrupted, fissured or eroded plaque and coronary thrombus 27, 28 . In
this paper, we described the composition of occlusive coronary thrombi obtained from
patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the relationship between
the SRA index and these thrombi, and the utility of SRA index as an indication of disrupted,
fissured or eroded plaque and coronary thrombus in patients with ACS.
2. Study subjects
Eight autopsy cases with acute myocardial infarction, 393 patients with STEMI and 79
patients with unstable angina (UA) were examined. Patients with STEMI were treated with
percutaneous intracoronary thrombectomy during primary angioplasty. High-sensitivity C-
reactive protein (h-CRP), creatine kinase (CK) and creatine kinase-MB isozyme (CK-MB)
were examined in patients with STEMI. PB from 43 apparently healthy men and women in
their 20s was examined as a control.
3. Thrombectomy procedure
On admission, all patients were treated with 162 mg aspirin (Ebis, Osaka, Japan), and they
underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of the infarct-related artery through the
femoral access route with a 6F guiding catheter. Thrombectomy was performed with a
RescueTM catheter (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) or a TVAC catheter (NIPRO, Osaka,
Japan). Aspirated blood and intracoronary material were collected in a collection bottle,
which was equipped with a filter. Stent implantation was performed in 386 patients and all
patients were treated with antithrombotic therapy.
5. Cytological methods
I believe that the method of cytological examination of peripheral blood is my original
method 29. Briefly, red blood cells were lysed with lysing reagent (826 mg of NH4CL + 3.7
mg of EDTA-4Na + 100 mg of KHCO3 in 100 ml H2O), then nucleated cells were
suspended in isotonic sodium chloride solution, and the suspensions containing about
5x106 nucleated cells were smeared on glass slides using Auto smear CF-12 (Sakura Seiki,
Tokyo, Japan). Cells that did not adhere to the glass slides were gently washed away
with 95% ethanol solution. Smear preparations were fixed in 95% ethanol solution and
stained with the Papanicolaou method. A smear preparation of PB is shown in figure 1.
About one million and two hundred thousand nucleated cells were smeared in one slide.
Nucleated cells are smeared evenly and precise nuclear structures are excellently
preserved. About one thousand nucleated cells were observed in one high power field
(×400, Figure 2).
Fig. 1. A cytological preparation of peripheral blood stained with the Papanicolaou method.
About one million and two hundred thousand nucleated cells are smeared in one slide.
Papanicolaou stain.
28 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Fig. 2. About one thousand nucleated cells are observed in one high power field (×400).
Nucleated cells are smeared evenly and precise nuclear structures are excellently preserved.
Papanicolaou stain.
6. Definitions
Thrombi were classified into 4 groups according to previously published definitions
considering age and constituents of thrombus13, 30 : 1) an eosinophilic mass with neo-
vascularization (organizing thrombus: OT), 2) a structureless eosinophilic (hyalin) mass
(fibrin-rich thrombus: FT), 3) Thrombus containing significant quantities of platelets,
erythrocytes, fibrin and leukocytes (mixed thrombus: MT), and 4) tightly packed but
individually discernible platelets (platelet thrombus: PT). In this paper, we defined MT and
FT as RMT. Plaque components were identified based on the presence of foamy
macrophages, cholesterol crystals, collagen tissue, and/or calcification. Since the aspirated
material was fragmented, and PT seemed to be the freshest thrombus, contact between PT
and other types of thrombus (PT and MT: P-M, PT and FT: P-F,) and contact between PT and
plaque content (P-C) were examined in all cases to investigate the process of coronary
occlusion. Cases were classified into 3 groups according to the composition of the thrombus:
group A, containing PT only and P-C; B, a MT only, P-M and P-C+P-M; C, P-F, P-M+P-F, P-
C+P-F, and P-C+P-M+P-F. SRA+ cells in PB that had the same size and nuclear shape as
blood monocytes were defined as SRA+ cells. The SRA index was defined as the number of
SRA+ cells in 10 HPFs of PB smear samples. Based on the SRA index of apparently healthy
people in their 20s, we temporarily set the normal upper limit of the SRA index at 30 27.
Physiopathology of the Acute Coronary Syndromes 29
7. Autopsy cases
P-C was observed in 4 autopsy cases, P-M in 3 and P-M + P-F in 1. Numerous emboli of PT
were observed in peripheral small arteries and capillaries of the infarct-related artery in 6
cases. SRA index exceeded 30 in 5 cases. A typical case with acute myocardial infarction is
presented in figure 3 to 7. This patient is a forty-three year old male. He died suddenly.
Postmortem examination revealed disruption of the plaque and occlusive thrombus in the
left anterior descending artery (Figure 3). Thrombus is composed of platelet thrombus and
mixed thrombus + fibrin-rich thrombus (Figure 4 and 5). Platelet thrombus was adhered on
the inner side of mixed thrombus + fibrin-rich thrombus (Figure 4). Immunohistochemistry
for CD 42b revealed that platelet thrombus was deeply stained than mixed thrombus +
fibrin-rich thrombus (Figure 4). Fibrin mesh is contained in mixed thrombus + fibrin-rich
thrombus but not in platelet thrombus (figure 5). SRA+ cells are infiltrated in mixed
thrombus + fibrin-rich thrombus but not in platelet thrombus (Figure 6). Numerous emboli
of fragments of platelet thrombi were observed in small arteries and capillaries at the distal
portion of the left anterior descending artery (Figure 7).
Fig. 3. Plaque disruption (arrow) and thrombus formation in the left anterior descending
artery of the patients who died suddenly. Thrombus is composed of platelet thrombus (P)
and mixed thrombus + fibrin-rich thrombus (P+M). hematoxylin and eosin.
30 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Fig. 4. Serial section of figure 1. Platelet thrombus is deeply stained than mixed thrombus +
fibrin-rich thrombus, and adhered on the inner side of mixed thrombus + fibrin-rich
thrombus. Immunochemistry for CD42b.
Fig. 5. Serial section of figure 1. Fibrin mesh is contained in mixed thrombus + fibrin-rich
thrombus but not in platelet thrombus . phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin stain.
Physiopathology of the Acute Coronary Syndromes 31
Fig. 6. Serial section of figure 1. Scavenger receptor A positive cells are infiltrated in mixed
thrombus + fibrin-rich thrombus but not in platelet thrombus. Immunochemistry for
scavenger receptor A.
Fig. 7. Numerous emboli of fragments of platelet thrombi are observed in small arteries and
capillaries at the distal portion of the left anterior descending artery. Immunohistochemistry
for CD 42b.
32 Acute Coronary Syndromes
M 2
B P-M 202 243/389(62.5) 181/243(74.5)
P-C+P-M 39
P-F 23
P-M+P-F 14
C 57/389(14.7) 49/57(86.0)
P-C+P-F 8
P-C+P-M+P-F 12
Table 1. Brief title: Relationships between contact patterns of thrombus and SRA index at
hospitalization1.
1P: Platelet thrombus. P-C: Contact between platelet thrombus and plaque content. M: Mixed thrombus.
P-M: Contact between platelet thrombus and mixed thrombus. P-F: Contact between platelet thrombus
and fibrin-rich thrombus.
Physiopathology of the Acute Coronary Syndromes 33
Eighty-nine patients were classified into group A, 243 into group B, and 57 into group C
(Table 1). Typical findings of group A (P-C) are shown in figure 8. Macrophages in plaque
content were positive for SRA, and SRA positive cells were not found in platelet thrombus.
Figure 9 to 12 are typical findings of group B (P-M). Platelet thrombus is adhered on the
mixed thrombus (Figure 9, 10), and fibrin mesh is not observed in platelet thrombus (Figure
11). SRA positive cells are infiltrated into mixed thrombus along the boundary zone (Figure
12). Typical findings of group C (P-F) are shown in figures 13 and 14. SRA positive cells are
diffusely infiltrated in fibrin-rich thrombus (Figure 14). Fragments of PT are frequently
found in MT in many cases (Figure 15). SRA+ cells infiltrated into 147 (54.6%) of 269 MT.
These cells and SRA+ cells in PB were nearly equal in size, and infiltrated into MT along the
boundary zone between PT and MT in most cases. SRA+ cells were diffusely infiltrated into
all FT and OT. Some of these SRA+ cells were large in size. Foam cells in plaque content were
positive for SRA. SRA+ cells were not infiltrated into PT.
Fig. 8. Contact between platelet thrombus (P) and plaque content (C).
34 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Fig. 9. Contact between platelet thrombus (P) and mixed thrombus (M).
Fig. 10. Serial section of figure 9. Platelet thrombus is strongly stained. Immunochemistry
for CD42b.
Physiopathology of the Acute Coronary Syndromes 35
Fig. 11. Serial section of figure 9. Fibrin mesh is not observed in platelet thrombus.
phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin stain.
Fig. 12. Serial section of figure 9. Scavenger receptor A positive cells infiltrate into mixed
thrombus along the boundary zone. Immunochemistry for CD204.
36 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Fig. 13. Contact between platelet thrombus (P) and fibrin-rich thrombus (F).
Fig. 14. Serial section of figure 13. Scavenger receptor A positive cells infiltrate into fibrin-
rich thrombus. Immunochemistry for CD204.
Physiopathology of the Acute Coronary Syndromes 37
Fig. 15. Small fragments of platelet thrombus (P) are intermingled with mixed thrombus (M).
+
8.3 SRA cells in PB
SRA+ cells were observed in all control cases and in all patients with STEMI and UA.
Neither SRA+ large macrophages nor foamy cells could be observed in PB of all examined
cases. SRA index of control cases ranged 1 to 24 (mean±SD=11.1±7.5). The relationships
between SRA index and contact patterns of thrombus at hospitalization were shown in
table 1. At hospitalization, SRA index exceeded 30 in 276 of 393 patients with STEMI
(Figure 16). Thrombus was identified in all these patients with more than 30 SRA index.
PT was identified in 274 (99.3 %), and RMT in 230 (83.3 %) cases. From the viewpoint
thrombus, SRA index exceeded 30 in 230 of 300 (76.7 %) cases with RMT and 46 of 89 (51.7
%) cases with PT alone (Table 1). The percentage of patients with a SRA index more than
30 was significantly lower in group A patients than other groups of patients (P<0.001).
Significant differences were observed between group A and B, and A and C (both,
P<0.001).
Peripheral blood of 109 of 117 patients with less than 30 SRA index at hospitalization were
examined repeatedly, and SRA index of all 109 cases exceeded 30 within 2 to 3 days after
hospitalization. The maximum SRA indices of STEMI patients during 3 days after
hospitalization were significantly higher than those of STEMI patients at hospitalization.
The SRA index of 60 of 79 UA (75.9%) cases were 30 or more at hospitalization. The
differences in the SRA index were not significant between STEMI and UA (Table 2, P=0.218,
Welch’s test).
38 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Fig. 16. Scavenger receptor A positive cells in peripheral blood (SRA index: 187/10HPFs).
Table 2. The scattered plots of the SRA index of controls, AMI, UA.
Physiopathology of the Acute Coronary Syndromes 39
healthy men and women by various stimuli. Fuster et al. classified the progression of
coronary atherosclerotic diseases into five phases 35. Phase 1 is represented by a small plaque
that is present in most people under the age of 30 years. We set the normal upper limit of the
SRA index at 30 27, since plaque disruption, fissure, or erosion and RMT might not develop
in healthy men and women in their 20s, and SRA index of these control cases ranged 1 to 24
(mean±SD=11.1±7.5).
We considered two possibilities on the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the
differentiation of SRA+ cells in patients with STEMI (myocardial infarction or plaque
disruption, fissure or erosion). With the recognition that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory
process 36, h-CRP has been evaluated as a potential tool for predicting the risk of AMI 37, 38, 39,
and CK and CK-MB are good markers of myocardial injury. Macrophages are known to
arise from monocytes, and become larger over twice as large as monocytes with
differentiation. SRA-monocytes became positive for SRA after 5 days in culture with M-CSF
40, and differentiated into large macrophages by 10 days 41. Cytokines elevate in PB after
insult 42. Myocardial infarction is severe insult, so SRA+ cells may increase in PB as a result
of myocardial infarction. However, differentiation of SRA+ cells in PB was not considered to
result from myocardial injury, because there was no correlation between SRA indices and
CK, CK-MB, and h-CRP.
The differentiation of SRA- monocytes into SRA+ macrophages was believed to take place in
atherosclerotic lesions by stimulation of M-CSF 21-24. Disruption, fissure or erosion of an
atherosclerotic plaque is generally recognized as a proximate event responsible for the
development of the ACS 8-12. The SRA index of the patients with less than 30 SRA index at
hospitalization rapidly increased, and the SRA index of all these STEMI patients exceeded
30 within 2 to 3 days. We therefore surmised that SRA- monocytes might differentiate into
SRA+ cells as the result of exposure of plaque content that contains M-CSF to the blood
stream.
coronary occlusion was often preceded by a period of plaque instability and thrombus
formation, initiated days or weeks before the onset of symptoms 15-18, and total coronary
occlusion of the infarct-related artery always results from the growth of RMT 44, 47 - 49.
Considering these reports and the histopathological findings of thrombi, PT was thought to
be formed abruptly as a result of severe coronary stenosis due to sudden extrusion of
atheromatous debris into vessel lumen in 43 group A patients with a SRA index less than 30
at hospitalization, and due to gradual growth of RMT in group B and C patients. The
percentage of patients with SRA index more than 30 at hospitalization was significantly
lower in group A patients than other groups of patients. This finding seemed to support the
theory, since the SRA index exceeded 30 about 2 days after plaque disruption27.
to be common with the acute myocardial infarction. We, therefore, believe that the abnormal
increase of SRA+ cells is considered to be a useful finding to gather the presence of disrupted
or fissured or eroded plaque, PT, and probably RMT in patients with UA.
13. References
[1] Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic
therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised
trials. Lancet 2003;361:13-20.
[2] Freemantle N, Cleland J, Young P, Mason J, Harrison J. Beta blockede after myocardial
infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis. BMJ 1999;318:1730-1737.
[3] Latini R, Tognoni G, Maggioni AP, et al. For Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitor
Myocardial Infarction Collaborative Group.Clinical sffects of early angiotensin-
converting enzyme inhibitor treatment for acute myocardial infarction are similar
in the presence and absence of aspirin: systematic overview of indivifual data
from96712 randomized patients. J A Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1801-07.
[4] Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Effects of atovastatin on early recurrent
ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized
controlled trial. JAMA 2001;285:1711-18.
[5] Antithrombotic trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials
of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in
high risk patients. BMJ 2002;324:71-86.
[6] Gibbons RJ, BaladyGJ, Bricker JT, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise
testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the
1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531-40.
[7] Kumar A, Cannon CP. Acute coronary syndromes: Diagnosis and management, Part II.
Mayo Clin Proc 2009;84:1021-36.
[8] Falk E. Plaque rupture with severe pre-existing stenosis precipitating coronary
thrombosis : characteristics of coronary atherosclerotic plaques underlying fatal
occulusive thrombi. Br Heart J 1983;50:127-34.
[9] Davies MJ, Thomas AC. Plaque fissuring- the cause of acute myocardial infarction,
sudden ischemic death, and crescendo angina. Br Heart J 1985;53:363-73.
[10] Richardson PD, Davies MJ, Born GVR. Influence of plaque configuration and stress
distribution on fissuring of coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Lancet 1989;2:941-4.
[11] Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang Y-H, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors
and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N
Engl J Med 1997;336:1276-82.
[12] Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang Y-H, Smialek J, Virmani R. Effect of risk factors
on the mechanism of acute thrombosis and sudden coronary death in women.
Circulation 1998;97:2110-6.
[13] Falk E. Unstable angina with fatal outcome: Dynamic coronary thrombosis leading to
infarction and/or sudden death: autopsy evidence of recurrent mural thrombosis
with peripheral embolization culminating in total vascular occlusion. Circulation
1985;71:699-708.
42 Acute Coronary Syndromes
[14] Mailhac A, Badimon JJ, Fallon JT, et al. Effect of an eccentric severe stenosis on
fibrin(ogen) deposition on severely damaged vessel wall in arterial thrombosis.
Relative contribution of fibrin(ogen) and platelets. Circulation 1994;90:988-96.
[15] Hackett D, Davie G, Chierchia S, Maseri A. Intermittent coronary occlusion in acute
myocardial infarction: value of combined thrombolytic and vasodilatory therapy. N
Engl J Med 1987;317:1055-9.
[16] Davies SW, Marchant B, Lyons JP, et al. Irregular coronary lesion morphology after
thrombolysis predicts early clinical instability. J Am Coll Cardol 1991;18:669-74.
[17] Ohman EM, Topol EJ, Califf RM, et al. An analysis of the cause of early mortality after
administration of thrombolytic therapy. Cor Art Dis 1993;4:957-64.
[18] Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A, et al. Healed plaque rupture and sudden coronary
death. Evidence that subclinical rupture has a role in plaque progression.
Circulation 2001;103:934-40.
[19] MacNeill BD, Lowe HC, Takano M, Valentin F, Ik-Kyung J. Intravascular modalities for
detection of vulnerable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23:1333-42.
[20] Davies MJ, Bland JM, Hangartner JRW, Angelini A, Thomas AC. Factors influencing the
presence or absence of acute coronary artery thrombi in sudden ischemic death.
Eur Heart J 1989;10:203-8.
[21] Rajavashisth TB, Andalibi A, Territo MC, et al. Induction of endothelial cell expression
of granulocyte and macrophage colony-stimulating factors by modified low-
density lipoproteins. Nature 1990;344:254-7.
[22] Liao F, Andalibi A, Qiao J-H, Allayee H, Fogelman AM, Lusis AJ. Genetic evidence for a
common pathway mediating oxidative stress, inflammatory gene induction, and
aortic fatty streak formation in mice. J Clin Invest 1994;94:877-84.
[23] Clinton SK, Underwood R, Hayes L, Sherman ML, Kufe DW, Libby P. Macrophage
colony-stimulating factor gene expression in vascular cells and in experimental and
human atherosclerosis. Am J Pathol 1992;140:301-16.
[24] Rosenfeld ME, Ylä-Herttula S, Lipton BA, Ord VA, Witztum JL, Steinberg D.
Macrophage colony-stimulating factor mRNA and protein in atherosclerotic lesions
of rabitts and humans. Am J Pathol 1992;140:291-300.
[25] Takeya M, Tomokiyo R, Jinnouchi K, et al. Macrophage scavenger receptor: Structure,
function and tissue distribution. Acta Histochem. Cytochem 1999;32:47-51.
[26] Kunjathoor VV, Febbraio M, Poderz EA, et al. Scavenger receptor A-I/II and CD36 are
the principal receptors responsible for the uptake of modified low density
lipoprotein leading to lipid loading in macrophages. J Biol Chem 2002;277:49982-8.
[27] Emura I, Usuda H, Fujita T, Ebe K, Nagai T. Increase of scavenger receptor-A- positive
monocytes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Pathology International
2007;57:502-508.
[28] Emura I, Usuda H, Fujita T, Ebe K, Nagai T. Scavenger receptor A index anfd coronary
thrombus in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Pathology
International 2011;61:351-355.
[29] Iwao Emura. High incidence of apoptosis in peripheral blood of myelodysplastic
syndrome patients determined by Papanicolaou-stained preparations. Laboratory
Hematology 2003;9:42-6.
Physiopathology of the Acute Coronary Syndromes 43
[30] Rittersma SZH, van der Wal AC, Koch KT, et al. Plaque instability frequently occurs
day or weeks before occlusive coronary thrombosis. A pathological thrombectomy
study in primary precutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2005; 111: 1160-5.
[31] Konishi Y, Okamura M, Konishi N, et al. Enhanced gene expression of scavenger
receptor in peripheral blood monocytes from patients on cuprophane
haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial transplant 1997;12:1167-72.
[32] Villanova JG, Lucena JLD, Arcás NF, Engel AR. Increased expression of scavenger
receptor type I gene in human peripheral blood from hyperlipidemic patients
determined by quantitative additive RT-PCR. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta
1996;1300:135-41.
[33] Geng Y-j, Kodama T, Hansson GK. Differential expression of scavenger receptor
isoforms during monocyte-macrophage differentiation and foam cell formation.
Arterioscler Thromb 1994;14:798-806.
[34] Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Cheserbo JH. The pathogenesis of coronary artery
disease and the acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 1992;326:242-50.
[35] Ross R. Atherosclerosis -an inflammatory disease. New Engl J Med 1999;340:115-26.
[36] Kuller LH, Tracy RP, Shaten J, Meilahn EN. Relationship of C-reactive protein and
coronary heart disease in the MRFIT nested case-control study : Multiple Risk
Factor Intervention Trial. Am J Epidemiol 1996;144:537-47.
[37] Koenig W, Sund M, Frohlich M. et al. C-rfeactive protein, a sensitive marker of
inflammation, predicts future risk of coronary heart disease in initially healthy
middle-aged men : results from the MONICA(monitoring Trends and
Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Augsberg Cohort Study, 1984 to 1992.
Circulation 1999;99:237-42.
[38] Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation
2002;105:35-1143.
[39] Naito M, Kodama T, Matsumoto A, Doi T, Takahashi K. Tissue distribution,
intracellular localization, and in Vitro expression of Bovine macrophage scavenger
receptor. Am J Pathol 1991;139:1411-23
[40] Young DA, Lowe LD, Clark SC. Comparison of the effects of IL-3, granulocyte-
macrophage colony- stimulating factor, and macrophage colony-stimulating factor
in supporting monocytes differentiation in culture. J Immunol 1990;145:607-15.
[41] Sakamoto K, Arakawa H, Mita S, et al. Elevation of circulating interleukin 6 after
surgery: Factors influencing the serum level. Cytokine 194;6:181-186.
[42] Henriques de Gouveia R, van der Wal AC, van der Loos CM, Becker AE. Sudden
unexpected death in young adults.Discrepancies between initiation of acute plaque
complications and the onset of acute coronary death. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 1433-40.
[43] Murakami T, Mizuno S, Takahashi Y, et al. Intracoronary aspiration thrombectomy for
acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 839-44.
[44] Badimon L, Badimon JJ. Mechanism of arterial thrombosis in nonparallel streamlines:
platelet thrombi grow on the apex of stenotic severely injured vessel wall.
Experimental study in the pig model. J Clin Invest 1989; 84: 1134-44.
[45] Lassila R, Badimon JJ, Vallabhajosula S, Badimon L. Dynamic monitoring of platelet
deposition on severely damaged vessel wall in flowing blood. Effects of different
stenoses on thrombus growth. Arteriosclerosis 1990; 10: 306-15.
44 Acute Coronary Syndromes
1. Introduction
In patients with acute thoracic pain and non-conclusive acute myocardial infarction
electrocardiogram (non-STEMI), the biochemical diagnosis is an essential tool for its correct
treatment. The study of the chosen biomarker for cardiac injury has raised interest during
decades. The appearance of immunoassays to assess cardiac troponin I or T has reached
great improvements in the diagnosis, evolution and prognosis of the Acute Coronary
Syndrome (ACS), as well as in risk stratification of these patients and in patients with
chronic cardiac diseases as heart failure or cardiomyopathies. Regarding the analytical
sensitivity of the methods that evaluate cardiac troponin I or T these improvements have
made possible to measure accurately very tiny seric concentrations of the protein (high
sensitivity troponin) (hs-Tn). This fact, being positive in principle sometimes induces to
reconsider if tiny seric concentrations of isolated troponin I or T are not due to acute
myocardial infarction but to a less severe source which affects the myocardiocite, this will
oblige us to assess the clinical presentation in depth.
biochemical method chosen for the diagnosis of acute coronary ischemia. The criteria of the
WHO (WHO 1979 ) was followed until 1999, being the catalytic activity of creatine kinase
MB isoenzyme (CKMB) the marker chosen. In fact, according to the WHO to reach the
diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) two of the following three criterias must be
fulfilled: precordial pain with evolution longer than 30 minutes, specific electrocardiograph
changes and elevation of catalityc activity of creatine kinase (CK) and its isoenzime MB
(CKMB).
However, during the 1990s more sensitive and specific cardiac markers are marketed and
beginning to be used in order to detect the disease, such as the protein concentration of
isoenzime MB (CKMBmass) or Troponin.
In September 2000 the criteria which defines acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was
reviewed and a consensus document was published (European Society of Cardiology/ American
College of Cardiology Committe 2000) between The Joint European Society of Cardiology and
The American College of Cardiology where they give great importance to the alterations of
cardiac markers: Troponin or CKMBmass (no activity) for the diagnosis of the disease,
together with symptoms of ischemia or alterations in the electrocardiogram (ECG). In fact,
the main criteria to establish the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is to verify the
gradual release of troponin or CKMBmass, (typical curve of fast rising-descent), together
with at least one of the following alterations: a) ischemic syntoms; b) development of
pathological Q waves in ECG; c) indicative changes of ischemia (variations of the segment
ST,T)
SKELETAL MUSCLE
Thick
Filament
MYOSIN
MYOSIN ATP
TROPONIN
ADP+P
I C
ACTIN
ACTIN
T Thin I
Filament C Ca++
T
TROPOMYOSIN
REPOSE CONTRACTION
muscle and in the myocardium. Some specific anti-bodies have been patented in opposition
to troponin T and cardiac Troponin I so that they can be recognised by specific
immunoassays. Troponin forms (I and T) of skeletal and cardiac muscle: a) Are codified by
different genes; b) Have structures which are clearly differentiated; c) Are recognised by
specific immunoassays.
That is why the assessment of troponin T or troponin I favours the specific recognition of
myocardial damage even in the presence of concomitant skeletal muscle damage. Therefore
only troponin molecules fulfil the cardiospecificity criteria. This cardiospecificity guarantees
that the detection of a cardiac troponin molecule in plasma is indicative of myocardial
injury.
ISOFORMS OF TROPONIN I
Slow N 109 123 146 C
skeletal
muscle 215
MW 19800
Fast
55
skeletal
muscle
211
Heart
Muscle
31 209
Heterogeneity Heterogeneity
MW 24000
69% 44%
Fig. 2. Isoforms of Troponin I: In the figure we can see two isoforms of skeletal muscle, one
of slow contraction and another one fast and a specific form of cardiac muscle. The cardiac
isoform has 31 suplementary aminoacids at the end N-terminal of the polypeptide chain,
besides it differs from skeletal isoforms as it shows in the tracts of the primary sequence of
the protein a heterogeneity of 69% for the central tract (residues 30 to 110) and 44% for the
terminal tract (110-215) which seems to be more stable because of the protection carried out
by the subunit C terminal (Galän A 2004).
We confirmed the absence of crossed reactions (Galán A. 2002) for an Immunoassay
Troponin I (cat. nº RF421 Dade Behring) using the Dimension RxL automatic analyzer (Dade
Behring, Newark, Delaware, USA). The cardiospecificity of troponin I was verified using
Evolution of Biochemical Diagnosis of
Acute Coronary Syndrome – Impact Factor of High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays 49
myocardial and skeletal muscle (quadriceps, biceps) tissue. Troponin I was measured in
myofibrillar and cytosolic fraction. The absence of troponin I in skeletal muscle was
corroborated: the concentration of troponin I in biceps and quadriceps was not detected (<
1% of the values obtained in myocardial tissue). The troponin I concentration in the
myofibrillar fraction of cardiac tissue was 7.2 mg/g protein and only 4% of total troponin
content was found in the soluble fraction (figure 3).
8 CYTOSOLIC FRACTION
MIOFIBRILLAR FRACTION
7
TROPONINA I ( m g/g.prot)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Fig. 3. Tissue specificity for the troponin I method. The figure shows the lack of
crossreactivity of troponin I with skeletal muscle. No troponin I concentrations in the crude
extract of biceps and quadriceps were detected. The troponin I concentration in the
myofibrillar fraction of cardiac tissue was 7.2 mg/g protein and in the cytosolic fraction 0.3
mg/g protein. (Galán A. 2002)
This fact helps to understand the double diagnostic window of troponin: The small fraction
dissolved in cytoplasma of the cardiomyocites, which has relative precociousness (>6 hours)
in the detection of cellular injuries (similar to other cytoplasmatic proteins) and the majority
fraction which is the one linked to tropomyosin complex in structure and only appears in
plasma after cellular irreversible damage and after 40 hours from occurring and remains
elevated till 10-15 days after the injury, being then used as late marker of myocardial
necrosis (figure 4)
50 Acute Coronary Syndromes
45
Cytosolic Miofibrillar Fraction
40
Fraction
reference limits X 35 Early
Letar
biomarker
30 biomarker Mioglobin
25 CKMB Isoformes
20 CKMB mass
15 Troponin
10 days
5
0
Myoglobin and CK isoforms are the earliest markers and with the fastest elimination. CKMB
is cytosolic but it has higher PM than Myoglobin so it takes it longer to appear and clear the
plasma. Troponin, due to its double location has a wide diagnostic window (from 6 hours to
10-12 days) (Table 2)
2.3 Problem of the methods to assess troponin. Solutions taken. Guidelines for
clinical practice 1999 and 2001
In the beginning of working with troponin, either physician or biochemists wondered : Is
troponin so useful?, Which troponin method is the right one? (Troponin T or Troponin I),
What cut-off must we choose?, What marker or markers must be selected?, What intervals
must be used?
52 Acute Coronary Syndromes
At present there are black spots in the analytical management of the methods which assess
troponin as the election for cut-off or the lack of standardization of the different methods
available in the market (Wu Alan HB 2001), (Apple FS, 2001) and the low analytical
sensitivity of the methods among others. These factors may cause confusion in the election
of the method as well as in the clinical interpretation of the results (Table 3).
Fig. 5. Scheme of the release in blood of cardiac sub-units of troponin after acute myocardial
infarction (according to Wu y cols.) (Galan2004).
So the main problem regarding the methods that assess troponin is the lack of
standardization (Figure 6). As a consequence of that there is no transferring of the results
among the different commercial methods which assess this protein, what creates confusion
due to the analytical and clinical variability of the results. This makes it difficult to choose
the best method.
The absence of a material of reference which standardizes the methods means that the
results obtained can not be transferred. The methods will have a different cut-off, variations
in the limit of the cut-off, as well as imprecisions. On the other hand at low levels close to
the reference values the coefficients of variation are elevated.
The most suitable solution in the long run, as it is a difficult matter, to solve this problem is
to obtain international reference material, a topic in which scientific societies as IFCC and
AACC (American Society of Clinical Chemistry) among others have been working on since
2001. This would standardize the methods and the transferring of the results would be
achieved. What would not be unified is the variation of anti-bodies every manufacturer
uses. The problem is not completely solved as the reference material obtained, more
suitable, was elaborated by a sub-committee of standardization of the AACC in
54 Acute Coronary Syndromes
collaboration with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and certified
in 2006 as standard reference material SRM # 2921. This reference material achieves
commutability only with 50% of the commercial methods which assess troponin. In any
case, the standardization of the measurement methods of troponin is not finished yet, which
involves wide analytical variations noticed among the different immunoassays marketed
and appoved by the FDA. (Wu Alan HB 2001).
PROBLEMATIC SOLUTIONS
long-run unmediated
lack of standarization user solution
Choose
Choose
immunoassay
immunoassay
To obtein best
best
Lack result’s an fit
fitthe
the
transferibility high INTERNATIONAL infrastructure
infrastructure
imprecision REFERENCE center
center
at cuttof MATERIAL
leves (IFCC,AACC)
Require
documentation
high Manufacturer's
Imprecision technical
or
Result’s Evalute the method
Relative sensitivity
These Guidelines are in accordance with the latest analytic recommendations for the use
of troponin published in 2007 by the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB)
and the Committee of standardization of Cardiac Markers of the IFCC (NACB 2007)
which state that: To establish reference values 99th percentile must be applied on a
population of at least 120 subjects exempt from myocardial damage. It is required that the
imprecision of the method in the 99th percentile chosen is lower or equal to a coefficient of
variation of 10%.
To detect the Tn
To comply with the
Clinica Guides recommendations
99 percentile of the reference interval, with
of Scientific Societies
HIGH PRECISION ANALYTICAL
Reliably detected
risk stratification
Table 6 (from Jaffé 2010) holds the classification of the methods available in the market to
assess troponin according to the criteria of Apple 1999. None of the 16 methods mentioned in
the table fulfil the two conditions Apple demands in their criteria of high sensitivity method
% of detectable
99th Imprecision at Classification
values in
percentile 99th percentile according
reference
(in ng/L) (%) imprecision
subjects
Current available assays (generation)
Abbott AxSYM ADV (2nd) 40 15.0 Clinically <50%
Abbott ARCHITECT 28 15.0 Clinically <50%
Abbott i-STAT 80 16.5 Clinically <50%
Beckman Coulter Access
40 14.0 Clinically 50-75%
Accu (2nd)
bioMerieux Vidas Ultra (2nd) 10 27.7 Not acceptable <50%
Innotrac Aio! (2nd) 15 14.0 (at 19 ng/L) Clinically <50%
Inverness Biosite Triage <50 NA NA <50%
Inverness Biosite Triage (r) 56 17.0 Clinically Unknown
Mitsubishi Chemical
29 5.0 Guideline <50%
PATHFAST
Ortho Vitros ECi ES 34 10.0 Guideline <50%
Radiometer AQT90 23 17.7 Clinically <50%
Response Biomedical RAMP <100 18.5 Clinically <50%
Roche E170 <10 18.0 Clinically <50%
Roche Elecsys 2010 <10 18.0 Clinically <50%
Roche Cardiac Reader <50 NA NA <50%
Siemens Centaur Ultra 40 10.0 Guideline <50%
Siemens Dimension RxL 70 20.0 Clinically <50%
Siemens Immulite 2500
200 NA NA <50%
STAT
Siemens Immulite 1000
NA NA NA <50%
Turbo
Siemens Stratus CS 70 10.0 Guideline <50%
Siemens VISTA 45 10.0 Guideline <50%
Tosoh AIA II <60 8.5 Guideline <50%
Research high-sensitive assays
Beckman Coulter Access hs-
8.6 10.0 Guideline >95%
cTnI
Roche Elecsys hs-cTnT 13 8.0 Guideline >95%
Nanosphere hs-cTnI 2.8 9.5 Guideline 75-95%
Singulex hs-cTnI 10.1 9.0 Guideline >95%
Table 6. Classification of the current and the high-sensitive cTn assays according criteria of
Apple 2009.(source) Troponinas ultrasensibles en el dolor torácico y los síndromes
coronarios agudos. ¿un paso hacia delante? A.S. Jaffé y J.Ordoñez-Llanos. Rev Esp Cardiol,
2010; 63(7)763-68
Evolution of Biochemical Diagnosis of
Acute Coronary Syndrome – Impact Factor of High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays 59
From these results it is important to point out that the most sensitive methods (research
high-sensitivity assays) that is, with concentration values under 99th percentile and with
better imprecisions in such percentile, are the ones which show higher proportion of healthy
subjects (between 75-95% or >95%) which exceed the value of normality established for the
method
Table 7. Mandatory requirements for the use of a high sensitivity troponin method in
clinical practice
4.2 Establish the value of increase of high sensitivity troponin discriminator of acute
coronary syndrome
As a result of all the above mentioned it is easy to understand the difficulty in interpreting a
value of basal high sensitivity troponin in patients who go to the emergency room with
precordial pain and without conclusive alterations in the electrocardiogram. From the
biochemical point of view, the only way to help to distinguish if a high sensitivity troponin
elevation is due to an acute ischemia process or if the origin is a sub-acute cardiac disease or
chronic, as it happens with congestive cardiac insufficiency or cardiomyiopaties among
others, is to perform serial troponins, as the Guidelines for Clinical Practice in 2007
recommended (Thygesen 2007, NACB 2007). Nevertheless, given the early of the appearance
of high sensitivity troponin (3 hours after pain) as well as its high sensitivity in detection,
the basal determination and the determination 6-9 after pain would not be the protocol to
choose. With these new generation of troponins, the advisable to distinguish if we are facing
an acute necrosis process or an underlying ischemia of a chronic process, is to establish a
value of the increase of troponin discriminator of acute coronary syndrome (∆ Tn
discriminator). To obtain this data the increase in the variation of troponin should be
assessed for a 3-hour interval, in a group of patients who suffer from an acute coronary
syndrome and in another group patients who suffer a chronic process. In the acute ischemia
there will be a significant increase of basal troponin compared with the one carried out
between 3 and 6 hours later. In chronic processes the increase in troponin between 3 and 6
hours compared with basal troponin will be much lower. Once the Tn discriminator for a
determined method is obtained, in clinical practice the scheme in figure I could be applied,
which will help us confirm an acute myocardial infarction, at an earlier stage than with
traditional methods, or to look for other causes of the increase in troponin.
The correct establishment of the increase evolution of high sensitivity troponin for an acute
coronary syndrome, together with the strict study of normality values will clarify the
advantages of this new generation of methods for the early diagnosis of acute coronary
syndrome, as well as it will significantly benefit in the stratification of the risk, not only in
patients with acute coronary syndrome but also patients who suffer from other myocardial
injuries or increase of cardiac size among other causes.
62 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Cheast Pain
Non-STEMI
O houres
hsTn hsTn
< 99th percentil > 99th percentil
3 houres
ACUTE/CHRONIC ACUTE/CHRONIC
ACUTE ? ? ACUTE
AMI Re-test at 6 Re-test at 6 AMI
(12- 24) h (12- 24) h
Fig. 9. Clinical significance of hsTn using troponin increase ACS discriminator. Proposal for
the use of high sensitivity troponin in clinical practice.
6. Conclusions
In view of all the above mentioned we can conclude that the biochemical diagnosis of ACS
continues being a current affair and continues envolving. The process of troponin has not
finished yet. The appearance of high sensitivity methods seems to be promising. They help
to diagnose ACS much earlier and obtain higher stratification of the risk than convencional
Evolution of Biochemical Diagnosis of
Acute Coronary Syndrome – Impact Factor of High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays 63
methods. Besides, it will let us know about the prognostic evolution of other pathologies
such as chronic cardiac insufficiency as well as cardiovascular events in stable coronary
disease. Nevertheless, to achieve the efficiency that the test deserves we have to learn, again
to use and interprete the results of ultra-sensitive troponin. It is necessary to consolidate and
establish firmly the dynamic changes of troponin concentrations to interprete the results
accurately.
7. References
Apple FS, Adams JE, Wu Alan HB, Jaffe AS. Report on a survey of analytical and clinical
characteristics of commercial cardiac troponin assays. In Markers in cardiology:
current and future clinical applications. Armonk, NY 2001,4,31
Apple FS. A new season for cardiac troponin assays: It’s time to keep a scorecard. Clin
Chem 2009; 55:1303-6.
Braunwald E Biomarkers in heart failure.. N Engl J Med. 2008 (20):2148-59
The Joint European Society of Cardiology/ American College of Cardiology Committe.
Consensus Document. Myocardial infarction redefined. A consensus document of
the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology
Committe for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Eur Heart J 2000;21:1502-
13.
Galán A. Diagnóstico Bioquímico de la Isquemia Coronaria Aguda Medicina Clínica 2000;
115(17) :671-676
Galán, A, Curos, J Durán. A.Corominas ,V.Valle Analytical evaluation of two automatic
methods to measure blood CK-MB mass an Troponin I Journal of Automated
Methods and Management in Chemistry 2002;24(2):51-57
Galán, A. Curós y A. Corominas. Interés de las troponinas en el síndrome coronario agudo
en pacientes con insuficiencia renal. Medicina Clínica, 2004;123:551-6
Giannitsis E, Katus AH. Myocardial infarction. Current recommendation for interpretation
of highly sensitive troponin T assay for diagnostic, therapeutic and pronostic
puposes in patients with a non-ST-segment – elevation acute coronary Syndrome.
European Cardiology 2009; 5(2): 44-47
Giannitsis E, Kurz K, Hallermayer K, Jarausch J, Jaffe AS, Katus AH. Analytical validation of
a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. Clin Chem 2010; 56:254-61.
Giannitsis E, Becker M, Kurz K, Hess G, Zdunek D, Katus HA. High-sensitivity cardiac
troponin T for early prediction of evolving non-ST-segment elevation myocardial
infarction in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and negative
troponin results on admission. Clin Chem 2010; 56:642-50.
Jaffé A.S. J.Ordoñez-Llanos J. Troponinas ultrasensibles en el dolor torácico y los
síndromes coronarios agudos. ¿un paso hacia delante? Rev Esp Cardiol, 2010;
63(7)763-68
Kavsak PA, MacRae AR, Yerna MJ, Jaffe AS.Analytic and clinical utility of a next-generation,
highly sensitive cardiac troponin I assay for early detection of myocardial injury.
Clin Chem 2009 ;55(3):573-7
Latini R, Masson S, Anand IS, Missov E, Carlson M, Vago T, Angelici L, Barlera S, Parrinello
G, Maggioni AP, Tognoni G, Cohn JN; Val-Heft Prognostic value of very low
64 Acute Coronary Syndromes
1. Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of morality in the western world. The aim
of this chapter is to understand the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes from
atherosclerotic plaque formation, to plaque progression and vascular remodeling, to plaque
destabilization, to ultimately plaque rupture or erosion and thrombus formation.
A cascade of interacting factors leads to plaque formation, progression, fraglisation, and
rupture.
Features associated with plaque rupture are: large eccentric soft lipid core, thin fibrous cap,
inflammation in the cap and adventitia, increased plaque neovascularity, and outward or
positive vessel remodeling.
Vasospasm is a separate mechanism for developing ACS without plaque rupture or erosion
will not be discussed in this chapter.
2. Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis is a chronic disease that can remain asymptomatic through decades. It is
enhanced by modifiable and non modifiable risk factors and consists of intra intimal
accumulation of intra cellular and extracellular oxidized LDL, macrophages, T cells, smooth
muscle cells, proteoglycan, collagen, calcium, and necrotic debris. Low endothelial shear
stress can contribute to atherosclerotic plaque formation, vulnerabilisation, and rupture.
Intimal accumulation of oxidized LDL-C, called fatty streaks constitutes the earliest
histopathologic stage of atherosclerosis.
Adhesion molecules expressed by endothelial cells mediate the rolling and adhesion of
circulating leukocytes on the endothelial surface. Chemoattractant chemokines promote
transmigration of leukocytes into the intima. Monocytes infiltrate beneath the endothelium,
differentiate to macrophages, phagocytose the oxidized LDL-C and transform into foam
cells. Foam cells produce cytokines, growth factors, reactive oxygen species and matrix-
degrading enzymes, sustaining atherosclerosis progression. The intensity of oxidized LDL-C
accumulation in the subendothelial space is a major stimulus for the ongoing inflammatory
process. The accumulation of lipid-laden foam cells constitute the intermediate lesions or
pathologic intimal thickening, which evolve through several stages of progression.
66 Acute Coronary Syndromes
3. Arterial remodeling
Arterial remodeling involves a cascade of structural and morphological changes of a vessel
wall in response to various stimuli including changes in blood flow and pressure, and acute
injury; all three are common findings in atherosclerotic plaques.
Two types of coronary arterial remodeling have been described:
- Negative remodeling: defined as local shrinkage, negative remodeling is more often
seen in patients with stable angina and is associated with smaller plaque areas. It might
be seen in arterial wall healing after injuries such as balloon injury, that could be mainly
related to vascular wall contracture and consequent luminal narrowing. The biological
events involved in this wound healing involve complex series of interacting growth
factors, integrins and proteases.
- Positive or outward remodeling: defined by a compensatory increase in local vessel
size in response to increasing plaque burden minimizing the degree of luminal stenosis.
Positive remodeling characterizes unstable vulnerable plaques.
There are studies demonstrating that plaque rupture occurs in insignificant, mildly
occlusive plaques, this could be explained by positive remodeling: the increase in total
arterial area that accompanies plaque accumulation. Large positive remodeled plaques
while paradoxically protecting against luminal narrowing, are more susceptible to
mechanical forces that lead to plaque rupture and an unstable clinical presentation.
The pathogenesis of arterial remodeling is not fully understood and remains debated. Many
hypotheses have been advanced.
Arterial wall neovascularisation of atherosclerotic plaques seems to have a potential role in
modulating lesion formation and structural changes of the arterial wall, by nourishing the
growing plaque. Various angiogenic growth factors and receptors are implicated in
coronary wall angiogenesis such as VEGF/VPF, estrogen, interleukin 8, bFGF, and aFGF;
the role of TNF-α and TGF-β remains controversial.
Angiotensine II via AT1 receptors is another trigger of plaque neovascularisation and
remodeling.
Activation of NADPH oxidase by various triggers such as Angiotensine II and mechanical
stretch promotes ROS production and ROS-mediated pathways leading to vascular remodeling.
In addition Low ESS leads to inflammation of the wall beneath the plaque and shift of the
extracellular matrix balance toward degradation. Within such an environment the internal
elastic lamina undergoes severe fragmentation, and the atherosclerotic process extends into
the media degrading the collagen and elastin fibers, thereby promoting arterial expansion
and outward remodeling.
Human studies using intravascular ultrasound confirmed that outward or positive
remodeling is more common at culprit lesion sites in patients with unstable angina, whereas
inward or negative remodeling is more common in patients with stable angina.
4. Plaque destabilisation
Typically a vulnerable plaque is described as having a thin fibrous cap and a rich superficial
lipid core. Weakening of the fibrous cap is due mainly to accelerated degradation of
collagen and other matrix components.
Many factors contribute to plaque vulnerabilisation:
4.1 Inflammation
Inflammation cells such as activated monocytes and macrophages and, to a lesser degree, T
cells play a crucial role in destabilizing the fibrous cap tissue and, therefore, enhance the risk
of plaque rupture.
Adhesion molecules such as VCAM-1 as well as chemokines such as MCP-1 recruite
inflammatory cells into the atherosclerotic plaques. Inflammatory cells are activated in the
vessel wall by oxidized lipids and cytokines such as M-CSF.
Adventitial neovasculature also enhances inflammatory cells entry and recruitement inside
the atherosclerotic lesion.
Many mediators secreted by plaque macrophages could be involved in fibrous cap
weakening including:
- Interleukin (IL)-18: also called interferon gamma-inducing factor, is a proinflammatory
cytokine secreted by plaque macrophages. Increased serum IL-18 may be an
independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality.
- Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMP): mainly MMP-2 (Gelatinse A), MMP-9 (Gelatinase B),
and MMP-8 (Collagenase), released from activated macrophage foam cells, directly
mediate matrix degradation of the plaque fibrous cap. Oxidized LDL containing
arachidonic and linoleic acid upregulates the expression of metalloproteinase, while
HDL reverses this effect.
- Tissue factor: expressed by macrophages is the main initiator of thrombogenesis.
Inflammation usually concerns the entire coronary circulation not only the culprit lesion.
This fact explains why patients with acute coronary syndrome may have multiple
vulnerable plaques.
Stimulation of neovascularisation
Fig. 1. Fibrous cap assessment with OCT: fibrous cap is a signal rich layer separating the lumen
from the signal poor underlying lipid core. Fibrous cap is measured at its thinest segment.
70 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Fig. 2. OCT showing a thick fibrous cap, calcified plaque. Calcium is seen as a homogeneous
signal poor region with sharply demarcated edges.
Fig. 3. OCT showing a lipid rich plaque. Lipid is seen as a heterogeneous signal poor region
with irregular edges.
Pathogenesis of Acute Coronary Syndrome, from Plaque Formation to Plaque Rupture 71
5. Plaque rupture
As previously explained the fibrous cap rupture results from an imbalance between
synthesis and breakdown of extracellular matrix collagen and other matrix components
leading to thinning of the cap, predisposing the cap to spontaneous rupture or rupture in
response to a variety of triggers. Plaque rupture primarily occurs in yellowish plaques with
an increased lipid core and thin fibrous cap. Rupture of the thin fibrous cap exposes blood
flow to the lipid core. The lipid core is believed to be highly thrombogenic when exposed to
circulating blood. The enhanced thrombogenicity of the lipid core has been attributed to the
high levels of functionally active tissue factor most likely derived from the death of
macrophages inside the plaque. In addition to tissue factor, oxidized lipids in the lipid core
may also directly stimulate platelet aggregation.
The thrombus is usually occlusive in STEMI and nonocclusive in NSTEMI. Episodes of
plaque disruption and thrombosis may be subclinical and do not always result in acute
coronary syndrome. Healing process may play an integral role in the progression of
atherosclerosis, having the potential to cause sudden plaque growth.
72 Acute Coronary Syndromes
A B
Fig. 5. (A)- Coronary angiogram showing ostial occlusion (TIMI 0 flow) of the left ascending
artery responsible of acute STEMI; (B)- OCT performed in the same patient after thrombo-
aspiration and restauration of a TIMI 3 flow, shows the site of plaque rupture, defined by a
discontinuation of the fibrous cap and cavity formation within the plaque.
Fig. 6. Rupture site detected with OCT (right) in the setting of NSTEMI. The coronary
angiogram (left) shows a subocclusion of the segment 2 of the right coronary artery.
Pathogenesis of Acute Coronary Syndrome, from Plaque Formation to Plaque Rupture 73
A B
Fig. 7. (A)- Coronary angiogram showing occlusion of the segment 1 of right coronary artery
in a patient presenting with STEMI; (B)- OCT performed after thrombo-aspiration showed
residual white thrombus seen as a hypersignal protrusion within the lumen.
Fig. 8. Red thrombus in the setting of ACS is seen with OCT as hypersignal protusion
within the lumen, however, unlike white thrombus, red thrombus is characterised by a
signal attenuation and posterior signal free shadowing due to the backscatering properties
of the red blood cells wich are highly present in red thrombus.
74 Acute Coronary Syndromes
6. Plaque erosion
Plaque erosion usually occurs in younger patients, women and smokers.
Culprit lesion do not have a large lipid core but instead have a proteoglycan-rich matrix, a
deep lipid core, the prevalence of inflammation is lower with less macrophages and T cells
and more smooth muscle cells compared to culprit lesions in plaque ruptures. Plaque
erosion is defined as acute thrombus in direct contact with the intimal plaque without
rupture of a lipid pool. The plaque luminal surface is irregular and eroded.
Thrombus resulting from plaque erosion has been reported to be 20% to 40% of all coronary
thrombi. The precise mechanisms of thrombosis in this entity are not known.
Thrombosis in such cases might be triggered by an enhanced systemic thrombogenic state
such as enhanced platelet aggregability, increased circulating tissue factor levels, and
depressed fibrinolytic state. In addition activated circulating leucocytes may transfer active
tissue factor by shedding microparticles and transferring them onto adherent platelets.
Virmani et al have also identified yet another pathological variant where a calcified nodule
within the plaque erodes through the surface of the plaque leading to thrombosis.
7. Abbreaviations
ACS Acute coronary syndrome
LDL-C Low density lipoprotein cholesterol
ESS Endothelial shear stress
VEGF Vascular endothelial growth factor
VPF Vascular permeability factor
FGF Fibroblast growth factor
TNF Tumor necrosis factor
TGF Transforming growth factor
AT1 Angiotensine type 1
IL Interleukine
MMP Matrix metalloproteinase
NADPH Nicotinamide Adenosine Dinucleotide Phosphate
VCAM Vascular cellular adhesion molecule
ROS Reactive oxygen species
MCP Monocyte Chemotactic Protein
CSF Colony stimulating factor
ACE Angiotensine converting enzyme
HDL High density lipoprotein
eNOS Endothelial nitric oxide synthase
OCT Optical coherence tomography
TIMI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction
STEMI ST elevation myocardial infarction
NSTEMI Non ST elevation myocardial infarction
Pathogenesis of Acute Coronary Syndrome, from Plaque Formation to Plaque Rupture 75
8. References
[1] Molecular bases of the acute coronary syndrome. Libby, P. Circulation 1995; 91:2844.
[2] Evidence for increased collagenolysis by interstitial collagenases-1 and -3 in vulnerable
human atheromatous plaques. Sukhova GK, Schonbeck U, Rabkin E, et al.
Circulation 1999; 99:2503.
[3] Site of intimal rupture or erosion of thrombosed coronary atherosclerotic plaques is
characterized by an inflammatory process irrespective of the dominant plaque
morphology. Van der Wal AC, Becker AE, Van der Loos CM, Das PK. Circulation
1994; 89:36.
[4] Focal and multi-focal plaque macrophage distributions in patients with acute and stable
presentations of coronary artery disease. MacNeill BD, Jang IK, Bouma BE, et al.. J
Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:972.
[5] Increased expression of membrane type 3-matrix metalloproteinase in human
atherosclerotic plaque: role of activated macrophages and inflammatory cytokines.
Uzui H, Harpf A, Liu M, et al. Circulation 2002; 106:3024.
[6] Oxidized low density lipoprotein regulates matrix metalloproteinase-9 and its tissue
inhibitor in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Xu X-P, Meisel SR, Ong JM, et
al. Circulation 1999; 99:993.
[7] Expression of angiotensin II and interleukin 6 in human coronary atherosclerotic
plaques: potential implications for inflammation and plaque instability. Schieffer B,
Schieffer E, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, et al. Circulation 2000; 101:1372.
[8] Distribution of inflammatory cells in atherosclerotic plaques relates to the direction of
flow. Dirksen MT, van der Wal AC, van den Berg FM, et al.Circulation 1998;
98:2000.
[9] Association between myocardial infarction and the mast cells in the adventitia of the
infarct-related coronary artery. Kaartinen M, Penttila A, et al. Circulation 1999;
99:361.
[10] Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial
infarction. DeWood MA, Spores J, Notske R, et al. N Engl J Med 1980; 303:897.
[11] Coronary arteriographic findings in acute transmural myocardial infarction. DeWood
MA, Spores J, Hensley GR, et al. Circulation 1983; 68:I39.
[12] The non-Q wave myocardial infarction revisited: 10 years later. Liebson PR, KleinLW et
al. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1997; 39:399.
[13] Elevations in troponin T and I are associated with abnormal tissue level perfusion: a
TACTICS-TIMI 18 substudy. Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of
Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial
Infarction. Wong GC, Morrow DA, Murphy S, et al. Circulation 2002; 106:202.
[14] A Prospective Natural-History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis. Stone G, Maehara A,
Lansky A, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz G, Mehran R, McPherson J, Farhat N,
Marso S, Parise H, Templin B, White R, Zhang Z, Serruys P, for the PROSPECT
Investigators. N Engl J Med 2011;364:226-35.
[15] Coronary plaque erosion without rupture into a lipid core a frequent cause of coronary
thrombosis in sudden coronary death. Farb A, Burke AP, Tang AL, Liang TY,
Mannan P, Smialek J, Virmani R. Circulation. 1996 Apr 1;93(7):1354-63.
[16] Exercise and acute cardiovascular events placing the risks into perspective: a scientific
statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical
76 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Indonesia
1. Introduction
Acute coronary syndrome is a clinical condition of partial or total obstruction of blood flow
in the coronary artery due to acute thrombus formation. Culprit vessel, coronary artery
segment within which the site of origin of thrombus formation lies, is occupied by eroded or
ruptured atherosclerotic plaque. Direct contact between circulating blood constituent and
atherosclerotic plaque content owing to loss of endothelial cell barrier orchestrates the
haemostasis events, i.e. thrombus formation and coagulation activation. Evolved within
years of human life span, atherosclerotic undergoes three main steps: initiation, progression
and finally complication (Libby, 2002).
Atherosclerotic plaque development involves cellular and molecular interactions as well as
blood flow dynamic alterations in the affected area. Although these steps affect all
individual, some gather the risk factors to develop progression and complication of
coronary atherosclerotic lesion faster and more prominent than others. Given the dynamic
nature of these steps, understanding several mechanisms engage in every step will provide
insight into therapeutic approach. Here, we review the last two steps of coronary
atherosclerotic plaque development, with the focus in the role of platelets, anucleated cells
being the target for therapeutic advancement in atherosclerosis and acute coronary
syndrome.
*Budi Y. Setianto1,2, Hariadi Hariawan1,2, Lucia K. Dinarti1,2, Nahar Taufiq1,2, Erika Maharani1,2,
Irsad A. Arso1,2, Hasanah Mumpuni1,2, Putrika P.R. Gharini1,2, Dyah W. Anggrahini1,2 and Bambang Irawan1,2
1Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
2Pusat Jantung Terpadu / Heart Centre Dr. Sardjito Hospital , Yogyakarta, Indonesia
78 Acute Coronary Syndromes
exposes thrombogenic plaque to circulation. Platelets, around 150,000 until 450,000 per
millilitre circulate in the blood without contacting endothelial cells, adhere to exposed site,
are activated and initiate the event to seal the broken plaque surface. Unfortunately, this
process gives rise to thrombus formation and acute coronary syndrome.
medial layer is another hallmark of progressed plaque (Fleiner et al., 2004). Hyperplastic
network of vasa vasorum and ectopic neovascularization of the plaque are associated with
intimal thickening, lipid contents and the degree of inflammation (Fleiner et al., 2004). The
extent of these microvessels delivers a channel for entry of inflammatory cells into the
plaque, boosting inflammation even more (Lusis, 2000). This blood vessel networks are
fragile and prone to rupture and create an outward expansion of intraplaque hemorrhage
that may overwhelm the integrity of the fibrous cap (Dickson & Gottlieb, 2003).
Thrombogenic property of lipid-rich necrotic core is determined by its collagen and tissue
factor content. Two important direct platelet agonists dwell in the lipid-rich core, i.e
lysophosphatidic acid which mediates platelet shape change during thrombus formation
and collagen which induces platelet adhesion and aggregation (Lusis, 2000). Tissue factor,
another major thrombogenic subtrate in the lipid-rich core, is released by endothelial cells,
smooth muscle cells, monocytes and macrophages or foam cells (Moons et al., 2002). The
most abundant tissue factor site is in the necrotic core (Moons et al., 2002). Tissue factor
activates coagulation cascade and promotes thrombus stabiliy through fibrin network
formation. Platelets are also capable in releasing tissue factor which give a hint of their role
in supporting coagulation process (Zillmann et al., 2001).
show that platelet αIIbβ3 and endothelial cell αvβ3, mediate firm contact between platelets
and activated endothelial cells (Bombeli et al., 1998; Maasberg et al, 1999). By forming a
bridge to fibrinogen, αIIbβ3 promotes arrest of platelets to adhesion molecules, intercellular
adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM)-1, and to αvβ3 on activated endothelial cells (Bombeli et al.,
1998; von Hundelshausen & Weber, 2007). Fibrinogen links platelet fibrinogen receptor on
the surface of αIIbβ3 to the endothelial cell αvβ3 and forms the firm platelet adhesion to
activated endothelial cells (Gawaz et al., 1991).
Fig. 1. Rolling of platelets to endothelial cells is mediated by platelet PSGL-1 and GP1bα
bind to endothelial cell von Willebrand factor and P selectin.
It is worth mentioning that interaction between platelets and activated endothelial cells is
not sufficient to promote thrombus formation. However, platelet adhesion to endothelial
cells contributes to the progression of the plaque. Platelets mediate such effects through
releasing products following adhesion and activation. The contents of storage granules are
liberated upon platelet activation. It is estimated more than 300 proteins are secreted from
activated platelets, which act in an autocrine or paracrine manner to modulate cell signaling
and mediate the plaque progression (Coppinger et al., 2004).
Endothelial cell chemotactic, adhesion, and proteoliytic capacities are altered by paracrine
modulation of substances released by adherent activated platelets. Here are the lists of
platelet contents released upon adhesion and activation : (1) adhesion proteins (e.g., P-
selectin, vitronectin, fibrinogen, fibronectin, von Willebrand factor, thrombospondin and
αIIbβ3), (2) growth factors (e.g., PDGF, TGF-β, EGF and bFGF), (3) chemokines (e.g.
RANTES, PF-4 and epithelial-neutrophil activating protein 78 (ENA-78)), (4) cytokine-like
factors (e.g. IL-1β, CD40 ligand and β-thromboglobulin) and (5) coagulation factors (e.g.
factor V, factor XI, PAI-1, plasminogen and protein S) (Gawaz et al., 2005).
In vitro study revealed that activated platelets coincubated with cultured endothelial cells
gave rise to a secretion of MCP-1 and surface expression of ICAM-1 and αvβ3 on endothelial
cells, which is mediated by an IL-1-dependent mechanism (Gawaz et al., 2000). MCP-1 is an
effectual chemotactic factor for monocytes and ICAM-1 is an adhesion molecule which
advocates monocyte and neutrophil recruitment to endothelial cells. This study emphasized
Plaque, Platelets, and Plug – The Pathogenesis of Acute Coronary Syndrome 83
the important role of IL-1β on mediating endothelial cell activity upon platelet activation.
IL-1 is the prototypic cytokine released by inflammatory cells and three members of the IL-1
gene family have been identified: IL-1, IL-1β, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) (von
Hundelshausen & Weber, 2007). Platelet activation induces rapid and persistent synthesis
and release of IL1β and converts endothelial cell phenotype to become more adhesive to
circulating neutrophils (Lindemann et al., 2001). Inhibition of β3 integrin attenuated the
synthesis of platelet IL-1β, indicating firm adhesion of platelet to endothelial cells is
prerequisite for IL-1β sustained secretion (Lindemann et al., 2001).
Fig. 2. Tight adhesion of platelets to endothelial cells is mediated by platelet αIIbβ3 bind to
endothelial cell αvβ3, bridged by fibrinogen, and ICAM-1. This results in release of platelet
contents (blue dots) which mediates endothelial activated molecules (green dots) expression,
Upon activation, platelet expresses CD40 ligand (CD40L) which ligates CD40 expressed by
activated endothelial cells (Henn et al., 1998). Platelet CD40L and endothelial cell CD40
interaction amplifies the release of IL-8 and MCP-1 from endothelial cells and enhances
the expression of endothelial cell adhesion receptors including E-selectin, VCAM-1, and
ICAM-1 (Henn et al., 1998). In vivo study using mice deficient of platelet CD40L shows that
platelet CD40L accelerate plaque formation and progression, mainly due to prevention of
leukocyte recruitment (Lievens et al., 2010). This study implicates that platelet CD40L is
important for recruitment of monocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes during plaque
intitiation and progression. Ligation of CD40L on endothelial cells promotes endothelial cell
tissue factor expression, thus enhances a procoagulant phenotype on endothelial cells
(Slupsky et al., 1998). Furthermore, it implicates in both the generation and secretion of
matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and protease receptor urokinase-type plasminogen
activator receptor (uPAR), thus promotes proteolytic activity on endothelial cells (May et
al., 2002). Tight adhesion of platelet to endothelial cell via αIIbβ3 binding enhances platelet
CD40L upregulation and matrix degradation (May et al., 2002). This endothelial-mediated
matrix degradation is important in digestion of fibrous cap, thus promotes imbalance of
matrix production and degradation and subsequently weakens the cap. This contributes to
loss of cap protection and threatens plaque in rupture-prone condition.
84 Acute Coronary Syndromes
PF-4, stored in platelet alpha granules, is the most abundant protein secreted by activated
platelets. In histopathological study on human carotid atherosclerotic, PF-4 accumulates
within macrophages of the plaque in the early lesion and continues to accumulate in foam
cells and neovascular endothelial cells as lesion progressed (Pitsilos et al., 2003). PF-4 is
deposited on the endothelial cell surface and retained by subendothelial proteoglycan
(Aidoudi & Bikfalvi, 2010). PF-4 can activate endothelial cells by stimulating E-selectin
expression (Yu et al., 2005). In vitro study indicates that PF-4 inhibits apolipoprotein B-
containing LDL catabolism and facilitates retension of LDL on cell surface (Sachais et al.,
2002). PF-4 blocks LDL uptake by LDL receptor expressed by vascular wall cells, thus
increases its retention and prolongs its residence time in the vascular space which allows
apolipoprotein-B to be modified and increases ox-LDL deposition (Nassar et al., 2002).
RANTES, secreted by activated platelets, triggers monocyte arrest and recruitment under
flow conditions in vitro and in perfused carotid arteries (von Hundelshausen et al., 2001).
Platelet P-selectin is important mediator of RANTES upregulation, indicates that RANTES is
secreted during platelet rolling to endothelial cells (Schober et al., 2002). In atherosclerotic
lesions and injury of apolipoprotein-E deficient mice, RANTES is expressed on endothelial
cells (von Hundelshausen et al., 2001). Endothelial cells should have been modified by IL-1β,
in order to receive the deposition of RANTES (Weyrich et al., 2002). Taken together,
platelet-generated RANTES involves in atherosclerosis early in the beginning and more
prominently in the plaque progression by modulating intimal hyperplasia and monocyte
recruitment (Schober et al., 2002). Initial knowledge of ENA-78 activity is that this CXC
chemokine superfamily member is synthesized and secreted by activated endothelial cells
which give a proadhesive activity for neutrophils (Walz et al., 1997). Activated platelet
expresses ENA-78 which attract leukocyte to adhere the endothelial cells (Schober et al.,
2002). Furthermore, activated platelet-induced IL-1β action can stimulate endothelial cells to
secret ENA-78 which encourage endothelial cell adhesiveness (Weyrich et al., 2002).
3.3.1 Activated platelets bind and promote monocyte activation and transmigration
Monocytes are predominant leukocytes lodge in atherosclerotic plaque. Adherent platelets
efficiently mediate monocyte rolling and arrest, even at high shear rate. Monocyte rolling is
mediated by P-selectin on activated platelets and PSGL-1, constitutively expressed on
monocytes (Kuijper et al., 1998). CD15, expressed by monocytes, has also been shown to
bind platelet P-selectin (Larsen et al., 1990).
The initial connection between platelet P-selectin and monocyte PSGL-1 and CD15 is a loose
attachment, and within rapid periode it leads to elevated expression of the monocyte
Plaque, Platelets, and Plug – The Pathogenesis of Acute Coronary Syndrome 85
integrin αMβ2 (membrane-activated complex 1 (Mac-1)) and makes tighter adhesion which
support binding to platelet (Neumann et al., 1999). Monoctyte Mac-1 has several counter-
receptors expressed on activated platelet, such as GP1b, JAM-3 and ICAM-2 (Simon et al.,
2000; Santoso et al., 2002; Diacovo et al., 1994).
Platelet junctional adhesion molecule (JAM) supports platelet chemokine deposition and
promotes monocyte recruitment (von Hundelshausen & Weber, 2007). JAM-3 is identified as
a counter-receptor on platelets for the monocyte Mac-1 and mediates platelet-monocytes
interactions (Santoso et al., 2002). Mac-1 is also able to bind indirectly to platelet αIIbβ3
linked by soluble fibrinogen bridge (Gawaz et al., 1991). Furthermore, several protein-
receptor complexes mediate platelet-monocyte adhesion, such as thrombospondin which
form a bridging of the CD36-CD36 interaction in both monocytes and platelets, CD40L on
the platelet which attach to monocyte CD40 and monocyte triggering receptor expressed on
myeloid cell 1 (TREM-1) to platelet-expressed TREM-1 ligand (Van Gils et al., 2009).
The attachment of activated adherent platelets to monocytes induces monocyte activation
through shedding, expressing and releasing fungsional proteins. Interaction between
platelets and monocytes increases the expression and activity of chemotaxis (MCP-1 and
MIP-1α), proteolysis (uPAR and MMP), thrombosis (tissue factors), activation (TNF-α and
IL-8) and adhesion (Mac-1 and VLA-4) factors on monocytes as well as potentiates
monocyte to macrophage differentiation (Gawaz et al., 2005). In this respect, platelet-
monocyte interaction provides an atherogenic environment at the vascular wall that
supports plaque formation and regression (Gawaz et al., 2005). Similar to adherent platelets,
activated platelets circulating in blood stream can affect endothelial cell and leukocyte
phenotype (Huo et al., 2003). Circulating activated platelets are detected in the blood of
patients with atherosclerotic conditions, such as acute coronary syndromes (Sarma et al.,
2002), stable coronary disease (Furman et al., 1998), and diabetes mellitus (Broijersen et al.,
1998).
In vitro study shows that platelet P-selectin increases monocytoid cell adhesion to
endothelial cells (Theilmeier et al., 1999). In vivo study using apoE-knock-out mice reveals
that circulating activated platelets, through platelet P-selectin, promote monocyte
recruitment to atherosclerotic plaque and accelerate the formation of atherosclerotic lesions
(Huo et al., 2002). Platelet P-selectin-mediated interactions lead to deposition of platelet-
derived proinflammatory factors, RANTES and PF-4, to the vessel wall and monocytes,
resulting in activation of monocyte integrins, increased monocyte recruitment and accelerate
atherosclerosis (Huo et al., 2002). Inversely, at low levels, activated endothelial cells express
PSGL-1 and bind P-selectin on platelets and monocytes, thus mediating monocyte tethering
and platelet recruitment to the endothelial cells (Da Costa Martins, 2007).
Not only do adherent platelets form tight binding to monocyte, but also circulating
activated platelets attach to monocyte and form platelet monocyte complex (PMC). PMC
reflected great capacity of platelet activation and in lesser extent, monocyte activation (Van
Gils et al., 2009). Activated platelets bind via P-selectin to its receptor on monocytes, PSGL-
1, and form complexes (Van Gils et al., 2009). PMCs mediate monocyte tethering and
adhering to endothelial cell surface, making adherent monocyte-PMC cluster and promoting
monocyte, and probably platelet, transmigration into subendothelial plaque lession (Da
Costa Martins et al., 2004). PMC high adhesive capability to activated endothelial cell is due
to increasing integrin activation on monocyte and subsequently, increasing cell adhesion to
fibronectin, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 (Da Costa Martins, 2006). Monocytes transmigrate into
86 Acute Coronary Syndromes
the atherosclerotic plaque, and change phenotype, becoming macrophages which express
scavenger receptors and digest oxLDL to become foam cells (Libby & Aikawa, 2001).
Fig. 3. Activated platelets recruit monocytes via platelet P selectin binding to monocyte
PSGL-1 and CD15, subsequently stabilized by monocyte Mac-1 bind to counter receptors in
platelets thus promoting monocyte adhesion and transmigration into subendothelial.
Monocytes are the main source of tissue factor, an important determinant of thrombogenic
plaque (Lindmark et al., 2000). Along with more monocyte recruitment, macrophage
proliferation and tissue factor production intensify, filling the plaque with inflammatory
and thrombogenic material which promote plaque progression.
3.3.2 Activated platelets bind and promote lymphocyte activation and transmigration
Lymphocyte transmigration from circulation to atherosclerotic plaque follows three steps:
selectin-mediated rolling, integrin-modulated adhesion and transmigration. The
transmigration of all lymphocyte populations, i.e. T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells, are
enhanced by activated platelets (Li, 2008). Activated platelets interact with lymphocytes
through binding between platelet P-selectin and lymphocyte PSGL-1 forming a loose
contact, which subsequently induces clustering of αL integrin and enhances lymphocyte
firm adhesion via ICAM-1 binding (Atarashi et al., 2005). Among lymphocytes, T cells have
stronger adhesive capacity than B cells, indicates that T cells are selectively recruited in
mediation of P-selectin expressing cells (Li, 2008) Enhancement of T cell adhesion on
subendothelial matrix is mediated by activated platelets through formation of platelet–T cell
conjugates and via ligations of P-selectin, CD40L and αIIbβ3 integrins (Li, 2008).
In progressed atherosclerotic plaque, T cells make up nearly 10% to 20% of the cell
population and assemble at sites which are prone to rupture and cause fatal thrombosis
(Hansson et al., 2002). Most of the T cells in atherosclerotic lesions is T helper (CD3+ and
CD4+) and T-cell antigen receptor positive (TCRβ+), which indicate a function of
recognition of antigens presented by macrophages or dendritic cells (Hansson et al., 2002).
They modulate cell mediated immunity through secretion of interferon (IFN-γ), IL-2, and IL-
22 (Hansson et al., 2002). IFN-γ inhibits smooth muscle cell new collagen synthesis, which is
essensial in supporting fibrous caps, thus weakens fibrous cap and promotes rupture-prone
Plaque, Platelets, and Plug – The Pathogenesis of Acute Coronary Syndrome 87
plaque (Libby et al., 2010). Smooth muscle cells in the rupture-prone plaque express HLA-
DR which is susceptible to IFN-γ action (Libby & Aikawa, 2001). Furthermore, activated T
cells induce production of MMP and tissue factor, mediated by CD40-CD40L binding, which
enhances the thrombogenicity of the plaque lipid-rich core (Libby et al., 2010).
which contains several adhesive molecules such as collagen, von Willebrand factor, laminin,
fibronectin and thrombospondin (Andrews & Berndt, 2004). These molecules, once exposed,
provide ligands for various activated platelet surface receptors. Under low shear rate
condition, such as in vein and large artery flow, the molecules bind to platelet receptors are
collagen, fibronectin and laminin, whereas under higher shear rates, such as in small arteries
and atherosclerotic vessel, collagen and von Willebrand factor are principal molecules to
mediate platelet slackening, tethering and adhesion (Andrews & Berndt, 2004). The early
step of atherothrombosis is tethering of platelets to the surface of rupture plaque and is
accomplished through the interaction between platelet GPIbα and collagen-bound von
Willebrand factor (Ruggeri, 2002) and platelet GPVI and collagen (Andrews & Berndt, 2004).
GPIbα is the major ligand-binding subunit of GPIb-IX–V or von Willebrand factor receptor
and, in addition to binding site for von Willebrand factor, contains partially overlapping
binding sites for the leukocyte integrin Mac-1, α-thrombin, and P-selectin expressed on
activated platelets or activated endothelial cells (Andrews & Berndt, 2004). GPVI is a
collagen receptor of the immunoglobulin superfamily that forms a complex with the FcR g-
chain at the cell surface in human and mouse platelets (Andrews & Berndt, 2004).
Von Willebrand factor, stored both by alpha granules of platelets or Weibel-Palade body of
endothelial cells, is an adhesive glycoprotein found in circulating blood or subendothelial
matrix (Andrews & Berndt, 2004). Circulating von Willebrand factor, which amount is much
higher than that in subendothelial matrix, can be immobilized in exposed collagen via
collagen binding site and become the substrate for platelet GP1bα (Massberg et al., 2003). In
addition to collagen-bound, circulating von Willebrand factor can also be immobilized by
forming the multimeric connection to matrix-bound, platelet-bound or subendothelial von
Willebrand factor (Ulrichts et al., 2005). Immobilized von Willebrand factor is capable to
catch circulating platelets via binding with platelet GPIbα (Andrews & Berndt, 2004).
Ligation of non-activated platelet GPIbα with collagen-bound von Willebrand factor is not
stable enough and is intended mainly to slow down platelets and maintain them in the
rupture site, where subsequently platelets will be activated through various receptors,
mainly integrin, and stable adhesion is formed.
Fig. 4. Plaque rupture exposes platelets to thrombogenic collagen which attract them to
adhere via platelet GPVI bind to collagen and GP1bα bind to collagen-bound von
Willebrand factor, initiate thrombus formation.
Plaque, Platelets, and Plug – The Pathogenesis of Acute Coronary Syndrome 89
In addition to collagen-bound von Willebrand factor, collagen itself can capture non-
activated circulating platelets through platelet GPVI. However, GPVI has only a low affinity
for collagen which makes GPVI, same as GPIbα, incapable to mediate stable platelet
adhesion. Ligation of GPVI during the initial contact between platelets and subendothelial
collagen provides an activation signal through platelet integrins, αIIbβ3 and α2β1, which is
essential for subsequent stable platelet adhesion and aggregation (Gawaz, 2004). Although
not tightly adherent, this early adhesion of platelets is of adequate affinity to facilitate arrest
at high shear rate, leading ultimately to much more stable integrin-mediated adhesion
(Andrews & Berndt, 2004).
thrombus growth. The inhibiton of interaction of platelet αIIbβ3 - von Willebrand factor and
αIIbβ3 - fibrinogen by αIIbβ3 antagonists, i.e tirofiban, abciximab and eptifibatide, is of
potentially benefit in acute settings of coronary atherothrombosis, due to inhibition of
platelet aggregation, thrombus growth and stability.
Fig. 5. Adhesion and activation of platelets form stable plug via platelet αIIbβ3 bind to
collagen-bound von Willebrand factor and platelet α2β1 bind to collagen, thus stimulate
release of platelet surface receptors (blue dots) receptive to agonists and adhesive proteins.
In addition to integrin activation, several means of activation responses of platelets include:
mobilization of cytosolic calcium, secretion of ADP, shedding and secretion of CD40L,
released of tromboxane A2 (TxA2) and formation of pseudopods which support an effective
sealing of the denuded plaque area (Cosemans et al., 2008; Gawaz, 2004). ADP, secreted by
dense granules of activated platelets, stimulates platelets in autocrine loop through its
receptors, P2Y1 and P2Y12. P2Y1 activation mediates platelet shape change and initiates
platelet aggregation by mobilization of intracellular calcium (Andre et al., 2003). P2Y12
activation by ADP signal mediates inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and stabilizes platelet
aggregates as well as participates in the firm adhesion by activating αIIbβ3 (Andre et al.,
2003). Persistent signal to keep P2Y12 in active state is of paramount important to prevent
platelet disaggregation and to maintain αIIbβ3 in its active conformation (Cosemans et al.,
2008). In addition to autocrine loop, ADP also works in paracrine mechanism by stimulating
and recruiting non activated circulating platelets and inducing them to undergo aggregation
with adherent platelets (Gawaz, 2004). Antagonist for P2Y12, i.e ticlopidine and clopidogrel,
has already been widely used in acute coronary syndrome.
CD40L, expressed and released by activated platelets, binds to activated αIIbβ3 and
contributes in supporting platelet aggregate stability (Andre et al., 2002). Upon platelet
activation, the cytosolic CD40L protein is exocytosed to the platelet plasma membrane from
where it is also shed and release into circulation in soluble form, sCD40L (Andre et al., 2002).
These transmembran and soluble forms are detected to be elevated in patients with acute
coronary syndrome (Aukrust et al., 1999; Garlichs et al., 2001; Setianto et al., 2010). Both
transmembrane and soluble CD40L can form a cluster with platelet αIIbβ3 and lead to more
platelet activation and enhance thrombus formation and stabilization (Andre et al., 2002).
Plaque, Platelets, and Plug – The Pathogenesis of Acute Coronary Syndrome 91
TxA2 is made from arachidonic acid and is secreted by activated adherent platelets. It
strengthen the activation process after the release into the extracellular space and create
platelet feedback activation by acting as autocrine and paracrine manner on its thromboxane
platelet receptor (Gawaz, 2004). TxA2 has a vasoconstricting activity and thus favors
formation of the thrombus by slowing down the blood flow (Gawaz, 2004). Aspirin induces
a complete and permanent inhibition of platelet TxA2 production through the inactivation
of cyclooxygenase. In addition to αIIbβ3-mediated stability, several other adhesion and
signaling receptors contribute to thrombus stability, such as PECAM-1, JAM-A, JAM-C,
ESAM, CD226, and Epf kinases/ephrins, which is enable the tight contact of one platelet
with receptors on adjacent platelets (Brass et al., 2005).
5. Conclusion
Platelet is a key maker for progression of atherosclerotic plaque. Its ability to interact with
activated endothelial cells and leukocytes, provide the milieu of inflammation and
thrombus-prone environment in atherosclerotic plaque. Platelet, with relatively similar
pattern, captures monocyte and lymphocyte and grants them the path to transmigrate into
atherosclerotic plaque. Platelet is a central player during coronary plaque rupture. It starts
and nurtures coronary thrombus formation and stabilization. Platelet-based therapeutic
modalities for atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndrome are still in progressed studies
with some of them yield beneficial effect while others inconclusive.
6. References
Abedin, M.; Tintut, Y.; & Demer, L.L. 2004. Vascular Calcification: Mechanisms and Clinical
Ramifications. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, Vol.24, No.7, (May
2004), pp.1161-1170, ISSN: 1079-5642.
Aidoudi, S. & Bikfalvi, A. 2010. Interaction of PF4 (CXCL4) With The Vasculature: A Role in
Atherosclerosis and Angiogenesis. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Vol.104, No.5,
(November 2010), pp.941-948, ISSN:0340-6245.
André, P.; Prasad, K.S.S.; Denis, C.V.; He, M,; Papalia, J.M.; Hynes, R.O.; Phillips, D.R. &
Wagner, D.D. 2002. CD40L Stabilizes Arterial Thrombi by A 3 Integrin–Dependent
Mechanism. Nature Medicine, Vol.8, No.3, (March 2002), pp.247-252, ISSN:1078-
8956.
Andre, P.; Delaney, S.M.; LaRocca, T.; Vincent, D.; DeGuzman, F.; Jurek, M.; Koller, B.;
Phillips, D.R. & Conley, P.B. 2003. P2Y12 Regulates Platelet Adhesion/Activation,
Thrombus Growth, and Thrombus Stability in Injured Arteries. The Journal of
Clinical Investigation, Vol.112, No.3, (August 2003), pp.398-406, ISSN:0021-9738.
Andrews, R.K. & Berndt, M.C. 2004. Platelet Physiology and Thrombosis. Thrombosis
Research, Vol.114, No.5-6, (2004), pp. 447-453, ISSN:0049-3848.
Atarashi, K.; Hirata, T.; Matsumoto, M.; Kanemitsu, N. & Miyasaka, M. 2005. Rolling of Th1
Cells Via P-Selectin Glycoprotein Ligand-1 Stimulates LFA-1-Mediated Cell
Binding To ICAM-1. The Journal of Immunology, vol.174, no.3, (February 2005),
pp.1424-1432, ISSN:0022-1767.
Aukrust, P.; Müller, F.; Ueland, T.; Berget, T.; Aaser, E.; Brunsvig, A.; Solum, N.O.; Forfang,
K.; Frøland, S.S. & Gullestad, L. 1999. Enhanced Levels of Soluble and Membrane-
Bound CD40 Ligand in Patients With Unstable Angina. Possible Reflection of T
92 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Diaz, M.; Frei, B.; Vita, J.A. & Keaney, J.F.Jr. 1997. Antioxidants and Atherosclerotic Heart
Disease. 1997. The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol.337, No.6, (August 1997),
pp.408–416, ISSN:0028-4793.
Diacovo, T.G.; deFougerolles, A.R.; Bainton, D.F. & Springer, T.A. 1994. A Functional
Integrin Ligand on The Surface of Platelets: Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-2. The
Journal of Clinical Investigation, Vol.94, No.3, (September 1994), pp:1243-51,
ISSN:0021-9738.
Dickson, B.C. & Gotlieb, A.I. 2003. Towards Understanding Acute Destabilization of
Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaques. Cardiovascular Pathology, Vol.12, No.5,
(September 2003), pp.237-248, ISSN:1054-8807.
Dong, Z.M.; Brown, A.A. & Wagner, D.D. 2000. Prominent Role of P-Selectin in the
Development of Advanced Atherosclerosis in ApoE-Deficient Mice. Circulation,
Vol.101, No.19, (May 2000), pp.2290-2295, ISSN:0009-7322.
Fleiner, M.; Kummer, M.; Mirlacher, M.; Sauter, G; Cathomas, G.; Krapf, R. & Biedermann,
B.C. 2004. Arterial Neovascularization and Inflammation in Vulnerable Patients
Early and Late Signs of Symptomatic Atherosclerosis. Circulation, Vol.110, No.18,
(November 2004), pp.2843-2850, ISSN:0009-7322.
Freedman, J.E. 2005. Molecular Regulation of Platelet-Dependent Thrombosis. Circulation,
Vol.112, No.17, (October 2005), pp.2725-2734, ISSN:0009-7322.
Frenette, P.S.; Johnson, R.C.; Hynest, R.O. & Wagner, D.D. 1995. Platelets Roll on Stimulated
Endothelium In Vivo: An Interaction Mediated by Endothelial P-Selectin.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Vol.92,
No.16, (August 1995), pp.7450-7454, ISSN:0027-8424
Frenette, P.S.; Denis, C.V.; Weiss, L.; Jurk, K.; Subbarao, S.; Kehrel, B., Hartwig, J.H.;
Vestweber, D. & Wagner, D.D. 2002. P-Selectin Glycoprotein Ligand 1 (PSGL-1) is
Expressed on Platelets and Can Mediate Platelet–Endothelial Interactions In Vivo.
Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol.191, No.8, (April 2000), pp.1413–1422, ISSN:
0022-1007.
Furie, B. & Furie, B.C. 1995. The Molecular Basis of Platelet and Endothelial Cell Interaction
with Neutrophils and Monocytes: Role of P-Selectin and The P-Selectin Ligand,
PSGL-1. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Vol.74, No.1, (July 1995), pp:224-227, ISSN:
0340-6245.
Furman, M.I.; Benoit, S.E.; Barnard, M.R.; Valeri C,R.; Borbone, M.L.; Becker, R.C.;
Hechtman, H.B. & Michelson, A.D. 1998. Increased Platelet Reactivity and
Circulating Monocyte-Platelet Aggregates in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery
Disease. Journal of American College of Cardiology, Vol.31, No.2, (February 1998),
pp.352–358, ISSN:0735-1097.
Garlichs, C.D.; Eskafi, S.; Raaz, D.; Schmidt, A.; Ludwig, J.; Herrmann, M.; Klinghammer, L.;
Daniel, W.G. & Schmeisser, A. 2001. Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes
Express Enhanced CD40 Ligand/CD154 on Platelets. Heart, Vol.86, No.6,
(December 2001), pp.649-655, ISSN:1355-6037.
Gawaz, M.P; Loftus, J.C.; Bajt, M.L.; Frojmovic, M.M., Plow, E.F. & Ginsberg, M.H. 1991.
Ligand Bridging Mediates Integrin Alpha IIbbeta3 (Platelet GPIIB-IIIA) Dependent
Homotypic and Heterotypic Cell-Cell Interactions. The Journal of Clinical
Investigation, Vol.88, No.4, (October 1991), pp.1128-1134, ISSN:0021-9738.
94 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Gawaz, M.; Brand, K.; Dickfeld, T.; Pogatsa-Murray, G.; Page, S.; Bogner, C.; Koch, W.;
Schömig, A. & Neumann, F. 2000. Platelets Induce Alterations of Chemotactic and
Adhesive Properties of Endothelial Cells Mediated Through an Interleukin-1-
Dependent Mechanism. Implications for Atherogenesis. Atherosclerosis, Vol.148,
No.1, (January 2000), pp.75-85, ISSN:0021-9150.
Gawaz, M. 2004. Role of Platelets in Coronary Thrombosis and Reperfusion of Ischemic
Myocardium. Cardiovascular Research, Vol.61, No.3 (February 2004), pp.498–511,
ISSN:0008-6363.
Gawaz, M.; Langer, H. & May, A.E. 2005. Platelets in Inflammation and Atherogenesis. The
Journal of Clinical Investigation, Vol.115, No.12, (December 2005), pp.3378-3383,
ISSN:0021-9738.
Gawaz, M. 2006. Platelets in The Onset of Atherosclerosis. Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases,
Vol.36, No.2 , (April 2006), pp.206–210, ISSN: 1079-9796.
Hansson, G.K.; Libby, P.; Schönbeck, U. & Yan, Z. 2002. Innate and Adaptive Immunity in
the Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis. Circulation Research, Vol.91, No.4, (August
2002), pp.281-291, ISSN:0009-7330.
Henn, V.; Slupsky, J.R.; Gräfe, M.; Anagnostopoulos, I.; Förster, R.; Müller-Berghaus, G.; &
Kroczek, R.A. 1998. CD40 Ligand on Activated Platelets Triggers an Inflammatory
Reaction of Endothelial Cells. Nature, Vol.391, No.6667, (February 1998), pp.517-
615, ISSN:0028-0836.
Huo, Y.; Schober, A.; Forlow, S.B.; Smith, D.F.; Hyman, M.C.; Jung, S.; Littman, D.R.; Weber,
C. & Ley, K. 2003. Circulating Activated Platelets Exacerbate Atherosclerosis in
Mice Deficient in Apolipoprotein E. Nature Medicine, Vol.9, No.1 (January 2003),
pp.61 – 67, ISSN:1078-8956.
Kasirer-Friede, A.; Ware, J.; Leng, L.; Marchese, P.; Ruggeri, Z.M. & Shattil, S.J. 2002. Lateral
Clustering of Platelet GP Ib-IX Complexes Leads to Up-regulation of the Adhesive
Function of Integrin αIIbβ3. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol.277, No.14, (April
2002), pp:11949-11956, ISSN:0021-9258.
King, S.M. & Reed, G.L. 2002. Development of Platelet Secretory Granules. Seminars in Cell &
Developmental Biology, Vol.13, No.4 (August 2002), pp.293–302, ISSN:1084-9521.
Kuijper, P.H.; Gallardo Torres, H.I.; Houben, L.A.; Lammers, J.W.; Zwaginga, J.J. &
Kenderman, L. 1998. P-selectin and MAC-1 Mediate Monocyte Rolling and
Adhesion to ECM-Bound Platelets Under Flow Conditions. Journal of Leukocyte
Biology, Vol.64, No.4, (October 1998), pp.467–473, ISSN:0741-5400.
Langer, H.F. & Gawaz, M. 2008. Platelet-vessel Wall Interactions in Atherosclerotic Disease.
Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Vol.99, No.5, (May 2008), pp.480-486, ISSN:0340-6245.
Larsen, E.; Palabrica, T.; Sajer, S.; Gllbert, G.E.; Wagner, D.D.; Furie, B.C. & Furie, B. 1990.
PADGEM-Dependent Adhesion of Platelets to Monocytes and Neutrophils Is
Mediated By A Lineage-Specific Carbohydrate, LNF III (CD15). Cell, Vol.63, No.3,
(November 1990), pp.467-474, ISSN:0092-8674.
Li, N. 2008. Platelet–lymphocyte Cross-talk. Journal of Leukocyte Biology, Vol.83, No.5, (May
2008), pp.1069–1078, ISSN:0741-5400.
Libby, P. 2002. Inflammation in Atherosclerosis. Nature, Vol.420, No.19/26, (December
2002), pp.868-874, ISSN:0028-0836.
Plaque, Platelets, and Plug – The Pathogenesis of Acute Coronary Syndrome 95
Moons, A.H.M.; Levib, M. & Peters, R.J.G. 2002. Tissue Factor and Coronary Artery Disease.
Cardiovascular Research, Vol. 53, No.2, (February 2002), pp.313-325, ISSN:0008-6363.
Nassar, T.; Sachais, B.S.; Akkawit, A.; Kowalska, M.A.; Bdeir, K.; Leitersdorf, E.; Hiss, E.;
Ziporen, L.; Aviram, M.; Cines, D.; Poncz, M. & Higazi, A.A. 2003. Platelet Factor 4
Enhances the Binding of Oxidized Low-density Lipoprotein to Vascular Wall Cells.
The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol.278, No.8, (February 2003), pp.6187-619,
ISSN:0021-9258.
Neumann, F. J.; Zohlnhofer, D.; Fakhoury, L.; Ott, I.; Gawaz, M. & Schomig, A. 1999. Effect
of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade on Platelet-Leukocyte Interaction and
Surface Expression of The Leukocyte Integrin Mac-1 in Acute Myocardial
Infarction. Journal of American College of Cardiology, Vol.34, No.5, (November 1999),
pp.1420–1426, ISSN:0735-1097.
Pitsilos, S.; Hunt, J.; Mohler, E.R.; Prabhakar, A.M.; Poncz, M.; Dawicki, J.; Khalapyan, T.Z.;
Wolfe, M.L.; Fairman, R.; Mitchell, M.; Carpenter, J.; Golden, M.A.; Cines, D.B. &
Sachais, B.S. 2003. Platelet Factor 4 Localization in Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques:
Correlation With Clinical Parameters. Thrombrosis and Haemostasis, Vol.902, No.6,
(December 2003), pp.1112-1120, ISSN:0340-6245.
Romo, G.M.; Dong, J.F.; Schade, A.J.; Gardiner, E.E., Kansas, G.S., Li, C.Q., McIntire, L.V.,
Berndt, M.C. & López, J.A. 1999. The Glycoprotein Ib-IX-V Complex is a Platelet
Counterreceptor for P-selectin. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol.190, No.6,
(September 1999), pp.803-814, ISSN:0022-1007
Ross, R. 1993. The Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis: A Perspective for The 1990s. Nature,
Vol.362, No.6423, (April 1993), pp.801-809, ISSN:0028-0836.
Ruggeri, Z.M. 2002. Platelets in Atherothrombosis. Nature Medicine, Vol.8, No.11,
(November 2002), pp.1227-1234, ISSN:1078-8956.
Sachais, B.S.; Kuo, A.; Nassar, T.; Morgan, J.; Kariko, K.; Williams, K.J.; Feldman, M.;
Aviram, M.; Shah, N.; Jarett, L.; Poncz, M.; Cines, D.B. & Higazi, A.A. 2002. Platelet
Factor 4 Binds to Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptors and Disrupts The Endocytic
Itinerary, Resulting in Retention of Low-Density Lipoprotein on The Cell Surface.
Blood, Vol.99 , No.10, (May 2002), pp.613-3622, ISSN:0006-4971.
Santoso, S.; Sachs, U.J.H.; Kroll, H.; Linder, M.; Ruf, A.; Preissner, K.T. & Chavakis, T. 2002.
TheJunctional Adhesion Molecule 3 (JAM-3) on Human Platelets is A Counter
receptor for The Leukocyte Integrin Mac-1. The Journal of Experimental Medicine,
Vol.196, No.5, (September 2002), pp.679-691, ISSN:0022-1007.
Sarma, J.; Laan, C.A.; Alam, S.; Jha, A.; Fox, K.A.A. & Dransfield, I. 2002. Increased Platelet
Binding to Circulating Monocytes in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation, Vol.
105, No.18, (May 2002), pp.2166-2171, ISSN:0009-7322.
Schober, A.; Manka, D.; von Hundelshausen, P.; Huo, Y.; Hanrath, P.; Sarembock, I.J.; Ley,
K. & Weber, C. 2002. Deposition of Platelet RANTES Triggering Monocyte
Recruitment Requires P-Selectin and is Involved in Neointima Formation After
Arterial Injury. Circulation, Vol.106, No.12, (September 2002), pp.1523-1529, ISSN:
0009-7322.
Setianto, B.Y.; Hartopo, A.B.; Gharini, P.P.; Anggrahini, D.W. & Irawan, B. 2010. Circulating
soluble CD40 ligand mediates the interaction between neutrophils and platelets in
acute coronary syndrome. Heart Vessels, Vol.25, No.4, (July 2010), pp.282-287, ISSN:
0910-8327.
Plaque, Platelets, and Plug – The Pathogenesis of Acute Coronary Syndrome 97
Sevitt, S. 1986. Platelets and Foam Cells in the Evolution of Atherosclerosis Histological and
Immunohistological Studies of Human Lesions. Atherosclerosis, Vol.61, No.2,
(August 1986), pp.107-115, ISSN:0021-9150.
Simionescu, M. & Simionescu, N. 1993. Proatherosclerotic Events: Pathobiochemical
Changes Occurring in The Arterial Wall Before Monocyte Migration. The FASEB
Journal, Vol.7, No.14, (November 1993), pp.1359-1366, ISSN:0892-6638.
Simon, D.I.; Chen, Z.; Xu, H.; Li, C.Q.; Dong, J.; McIntire, L.V.; Ballantyne, C.M.; Zhang, L.;
Furman, M.I.; Berndt, M.C. & López, J.A. 2000. Platelet Glycoprotein Ib Alpha Is
A Counterreceptor for The Leukocyte Integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18). The Journal
of Experimental Medicine, Vol.192, No.2, (July 2000), pp.193-204, ISSN:0022-1007.
Skålén, K.; Gustafsson, M.; Rydberg, E.K.; Hultén, L.M.; Wiklund, O.; Innerarity, T.L. &
Borén, J. 2002. Subendothelial Retention of Atherogenic Lipoproteins in Early
Atherosclerosis. Nature, Vol.417, No.13, (June 2002), pp.750-754, ISSN:0028-0836.
Slupsky, J.R.; Kalbas, M.; Willuweit, A.; Henn, V.; Kroczek, R.A. & Müller-Berghaus, G.
1998. Activated Platelets Induce Tissue Factor Expression on Human Umbilical
Vein Endothelial Cells By Ligation of CD40. Thrombrosis and Haemostasis, Vol.80,
No.6, (December 1998), pp.1008–1014, ISSN:0340-6245.
Sniderman, A.; Vu, H. & Cianflone, K. 1991. Effect of Moderate Hypertriglyceridemia on
The Relation of Plasma Total and LDL Apo B Levels. Atherosclerosis, Vol.89, No.2-3,
(August 1991), pp.109-116, ISSN: 0021-9150.
Stocker, R. & Keaney, J.F.Jr. 2004. Role of Oxidative Modifications in Atherosclerosis.
Physiological Review, Vol.84, No.4, (October 2004), pp.1381-1478, ISSN: 0031-9333
Tabas, I.; Williams, K.J., & Borén, J. 2007. Subendothelial Lipoprotein Retention As the
Initiating Process in Atherosclerosis: Update and Therapeutic Implications.
Circulation, Vol.116, No.16, (October 2007), pp.1832-1844, ISSN:0009-7322.
Theilmeier, G.; Lenaerts, T.; Remacle, C.; Collen, D.; Vermylen, J. & Hoylaerts, M.F. 1999.
Circulating Activated Platelets Assist THP-1 Monocytoid/Endothelial Cell
Interaction Under Shear Stress. Blood, Vol.94, No.8, (October 1999), pp.2725-2724,
ISSN:0006-4971.
Theilmeier, G.; Michiels, C.; Spaepen, E.; Vreys, I.; Collen, D.; Vermylen, J. & Hoylaerts, M.F.
2002. Endothelial von Willebrand Factor Recruits Platelets To Atherosclerosis-
Prone Sites in Response To Hypercholesterolemia. Blood, Vol.99, No.12, (June 2002),
pp.4486-4493, ISSN:0006-4971.
Torzewski, M. & Lackner, K.J. 2006. Initiation and Progression of Atherosclerosis—
Enzymatic or Oxidative Modification of Low-Density Lipoprotein? Clinical
Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Vol.44, No.12, (December 2006), pp.1389–1394,
ISSN: 1434-6621.
Ulrichts, H.; Vanhoorelbeke, K.; Girma, J.P.; Lenting, P.J.; Vauterin, S. & Deckmyn, H. 2005.
The Von Willebrand Factor Self-Association is Modulated By a Multiple Domain
Interaction. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Vol.3, No.3, (March 2005), pp.
552–556, ISSN:1538-7933.
Vandendries, E.R.; Furie, B.C. & Furie, B. 2004. Role of P-selectin and PSGL-1 in Coagulation
and Thrombosis. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Vol.92, No.3, (September 2004),
pp.459-466, ISSN:0340-6245.
Van Gils, J. M.; Zwaginga, J. J. & Hordijk, P. L. 2009. Molecular and Functional Interactions
Among Monocytes, Platelets, and Endothelial Cells and Their Relevance for
98 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Japan
1. Introduction
Acute coronary syndrome(ACS) and acute aortic dissection(AAD) are life-threatening
conditions which can be difficult to differentiate in the emergency room because of the
similarity of clinical presentations. In addition, ACS can be caused in AAD as a complication
of the dissecting process. Usual form of ACS is caused by an obstruction of the epicardial
coronary arteries, which is initiated with the rupture of an unstable atherosclerotic plaque
complicated with subsequent thrombus formation(Libby , 2001). On the other hand, ACS
secondary to AAD is caused by malperfusion of the coronary artery by an obstruction of the
orifice as a complication of the dissecting process. If AAD is compicated with ACS,
prognosis becomes worse and the treatment of choice may be totally different from usual
ACS. Medications and procedures which are usually used in cases of ordinary ACS, such as
Heparin, antiplatelets, thrombolytic agents and catheter interventions, may be harmful in
ACS secondary to AAD. So it is of great importance to make a correct diagnosis of ACS
secondary to AAD for better treatment and survival.
2.2 Mechanisms
There are four possible mechanisms for coronary malperfusion in AAD(Ashida, 2000 ;
Cambria, 1988; Massetti, 2003 ; Neri, 2001 ; Shapira, 1998,)
1. buldging of the dissected false lumen producing occlusion of the coronary artery orifice
(Figure 1 A).
2. a retrograde extension of the dissection into the coronary arterial wall resulting in
obstruction (Figure 1 B)
3. disruption or detachment of the coronary artery from the aortic root(Figure 1 C).
4. dynamic obstruction of the coronary orifice by flail intimal flap(Figure 1 D).
Fig. 1. Four possible mechanisms for coronary malperfusion in cases of acute type A aortic
dissection. Mechanisms A to D correspond to mechanisms 1) to 4) in the text. See text in
detail (modified from Neri E et al. Proximal aortic dissection with coronary artery
malperfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001 ; 121 : 552-560 with permission).
Distribution of the each mechanism has not been well defined. In our
experience(Hirata,2010), among 10 patients in whom actual mechanism of coronary
malperfusion was identified during surgery, 5 patients had mechanism 1), 3 patients had
mechanism 2) , and 2 patients had mechanism 3). Identification of the mechanism for
coronary malperfusion is potentially important in relation to the therapeutic options
described later.
Fig. 2. Twelve-lead ECGs obtained from a 56-year-old male with type A AAD. This patient
had shock (initial systolic blood pressure was 60mmHg), cardiac tamponade and mild aortic
regurgitation. An ECG showed sinus pause with ectopic atrial escape rhythm, marked ST
elevation in both inferior and precordial leads. This patient had disruption of the orifice of
right coronary artery but the orifice of left main trunk was intact. Simultaneous ST elevation
in inferior and anterior leads reflected involvement of the conus branch or right ventricular
branch due to obstruction of the orifice of the right coronary artery. A horizontal arrow
indicates 1 second and a vertical arrow indicates 1 mV (same in Figure 3). Reproduced with
permission(Hirata K et al. Electrocardiographic changes in patients with type A acute aortic
dissection. J Cardiol 2010;56:147-153).
102 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Fig. 3. Twelve-lead ECGs obtained from a 46-year-old female with type A AAD associated
with Marfan syndrome. Note that ST segment was elevated in leads aVR and aVL, and
diffuse severe ST depression was also seen. This patient had acute pulmonary edema due to
severe acute aortic valvular regurgitation. Initial systolic blood pressure was preserved
(120mmHg). A transesophageal echocardiogram showed flail intimal flap in the ascending
aorta. The dissection was extended beyond the orifice of the left main trunk. Bentall surgery
and coronary reconstruction were performed. Reproduced with permission(Hirata K et al.
Electrocardiographic changes in patients with type A acute aortic dissection. J Cardiol
2010;56:147-153).
We recently reported that acute electrocardiographic changes(either ST depression and or T
wave inversion) were rather common in patients with type A AAD even if there was no
involvement of the coronary artery(Table 1, Hirata 2010). Only 27% of the patients with type
A AAD had normal ECG. These observations were consistent with others(Hagan, 2000).
Those acute ECG changes were closely associated with initial shock state(BP<90mmHg) and
cardiac tamponade in our experience of 159 patients(Hirata K, 2010).
Pre-existing chronic coronary artery disease has been reported to coincide in some patients
with type A AAD. In the international registry of AAD, Hagan et al reported that, among
464 patients, 4.3% had previous history of bypass surgery and 7.7% had evidence of old
myocardial infarction(Hagan, 2000). Creswell et al. found that about one-third of the
patients showed one or more coronary artery lesions greater than 50% with a coronary
angiography (Creswell, 1995). At present, in type A AAD, the contribution of preexisting
chronic coronary disease on clinical presentation, acute ECG change and needs for
concomitant bypass surgery has not been well defined.
Acute Coronary Syndrome Secondary to Acute Aortic
Dissection – Underlying Mechanisms and Possible Therapeutic Options 103
Chronic ECG abnormalities such as left ventricular hypertrophy with or without strain
pattern, bundle branch block, etc. were also common in patients with type A AAD.
patients in whom underlying AAD is a possible cause of ACS. Those patients include abrupt
onset with back pain, shock vital signs, mediastinal widening(ratio of greater than 30%),
pericardial effusion, aortic regurgitation, and aortic root dilatation(>30mm). If there is a flail
intimal flap, the diagnosis of AAD can be made at bedside
Fig. 4. A: A CT scan image showing severe narrowing of the left main coronary artey
(between arrows)due to the extension of the dissecting hematoma. B: The ostium of the right
coronary artery was not obstructed. T : True lumen, F: False lumen.
106 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Fig. 5. Coronary angiograms before(A) and after(B) stenting the left main coronary artery.
Note the severe narrowing of the orifice of the left main coronary artery resulting in poor
visualization of both left anterior descending and circumflex artery. After stenting the left
main tract became wide open and TIMI 3 flow was restored in both left anterior descending
and circumflex arteries. A:Left anterior oblique view. B:Left anterior oblique and cranial
view.
4. Conclusion
Recognition and appropriate management of ASC secondary to AAD is very important.
Because the mechanism of coronary malperfusion is totally different from usual ACS, the
treatment of choice is also very different. Making a correct diagnosis regarding underlying
dissection is very important.
5. Acknowledgment
We deeply express our thanks to Drs. Maeshiro, Henzan, Ie, Tengan, Yasumoto and Asato.
We also appreciate the hard work of all the past and current fellow doctors in the division of
cardiology, in Okinawa Hokubu and Chubu Hospital
6. References
Ashida K. (2000). A case of aortic dissection with transient ST-segment elevation due to
functional left main coronary arterial obstruction. Jpn Circ J ,64,130-4
Barabas M.(2000). Left Main Stenting-as a Bridge to Surgery- for Acute Type A Aortic
dissection and Anterior Myocardial Infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Intervnt, 51, 74-
77.
Blankenship J.(1989). Cardiovascular complications of thrombolytic therapy in patients with
a mistaken diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 15 ,1579-82.
Butler J.(1990). Streptokinase in acute aortic dissection. Br Med J 1990, 300, 517-9.
Creswell LL. (1995). Coronary artery disease in patients with type A aortic dissection. Ann
Thorac Surg , 59 ,585-90.
Eriksen UH(1992). Fatal haemostatic complications due to thrombolytic therapy in patients
falsely diagnosed as acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J ,13 , 840-3.
Hagen PG.(2000). The international registry of acute aortic dissection(IRAD) : New insight
into an old disease. JAMA, 283, 897-903.
Hirata K.(2010). Electrocardiographic changes in patients with type A acute aortic
dissection-incidence, patterns and underlying mechanisms in 159 cases. J Cardiol, 56
, 147-153.
Kamp TJ.(1994) Myocardial infarction, aortic dissection, and thrombolytic therapy Am Heart
J ,128, 1234-7.
Libby P.(2001). Current concept of the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes Circulation
, 104, 365-372
Maseetti M.(2003). Flap suffocation : An uncommon mechanism ofcoronary malperfusion in
acute type A dissection. J Thrac Cardiovasc Surg, 125, 6, 1548-1550.
Metha RH. (2002). Predicting death in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.
Circulation, 105, 200-2006
Melchior T.(1993) Aortic dissection in the thrombolyitic era : early recognition and optimal
management is a prerequisite for improved survival. Int J Cardiol 1993,42 , 1-6.
Neri E.(2001). Proximal aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion: presentation,
management and outcome. J Thrac Cardivasc Surg ,121, 552-60 .
Nikus KC.(2007). Acute total occlusion of left main coronary artery with emphasis on
electrocardiographic manifestations. Timely Top Med Cardiovasc Dis , 11 , E22.
108 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Shapira OM.(1998). Functional left main coronary artery obstruction due to aortic dissection.
Circulation,98,278-80.
Shirakabe A.(2008). Diagnostic score to differenciate acute aortic dissection in the emergency
room. Circ J, 72, 986-990.
Spittel PC.(1993). Clinical features and differential diagnosis of aortic dissection :experience
with 236 cases(1986 through 1990). Mayo Clin Proc. , 68 , 642-51.
The European Myocardial Infarction Project Group.(1993) Prehospital thrombolysis in
patients with suspectedacute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med , 329 ,383-9.
Wilcox RG.(1988) Trial of tissue plasminogen activator for mortality reduction in acute
myocardial infarction. Anglo-Scandinavian Study of Early Thrombolysis(ASSET).
Lancet , 2 , 525-30.
Yunoki K.(2010). Stenting of right coronary ostial occlusion due to thrombosed type A aortic
dissection : One-year follow-up results. J Cardiol case , 1, e116-170.
8
1. Introduction
Chest pain has been reported as a cardinal clinical feature among the patients with acute
coronary syndrome (ACS). However, several patients exhibit the atypical or no symptom on
initial evaluation. Atypical symptom was defined as the absence of chest pain before or
during admission, and may have included gastrointestinal or respiratory symptoms such as
dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort.
Patients who present without chest pain are frequently misdiagnosed, and less likely to
receive optimal treatment for ACS. Consequently, greater in-hospital morbidity, and
mortality are noted. Therefore, understanding the factor associated with atypical
presentations may help in the earlier detection and treatments in patients with ACS.
Prior to discussing the risk factor, clarifying the concept of symptom in patients with ACS is
needed to figure out this theme. In this manuscript, atypical presentation is used
interchangeably 1 or 1+2 in figure 1 according to each reference (Fig.1).
Fig. 2. Dominant symptom among patients with atypical presentation (Adopted from
Brieger D, et al. Chest. 2004;126: 461-9)
Table 1. Independent risk factor for atypical presentation (Adopted from Canto J.G, et al.
JAMA. 2000;283:3223-9)
112 Acute Coronary Syndromes
4.1 Women
Atypical presentation in ACS was observed more commonly in women than men in large
cohort studies (Table 2). Women with coronary heart disease are older by 10 years and
have more risk factors than men. It might be due to lack of early recognition and
management.
There are several differences between men and women in presentation. Women were less
likely to have typical angina, rated their pain as more intense, used different words to
describe it (more burning, sharp), and reported more non-pain-related symptoms than
men. They experienced pain and other sensations in the neck area more frequently.
Another feature of chest pain in women is that angina being induced by rest, sleep,
mental stress instead of or addition to physical exertion. Psychosocial factors might also
affect symptom presentation and diagnostic approach in women. For example, a history
of anxiety disorders is associated with a lower probability of significant angiographic
disease among women with chest pain symptoms. As women underestimate their own
risk of coronary artery disease, diagnostic approach by physician could be altered less
aggressively than men. Compared with men, women are less likely to perform cardiac
monitoring, cardiac enzyme measurement, electrocardiogram, cardiac consultation,
admission to a coronary care unit, undergo less coronary angiography, angioplasty, and
bypass surgery.
5. Conclusions
ACS patients with atypical presentation are under-diagnosed and under-treated high risk
group. Several clinical risk factors could be helpful in prediction of ACS in this group.
114 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Health care providers should have more concerns about the presence of ACS in patients
who have these risk factors.
6. References
Panju A.A., Hemmelgarn B.R., Guyatt G.H., Simel D.L. (1998). The rational clinical
examination. Is this patient having a myocardial infarction? JAMA, 280, 1256-1263.
Swap C.J., Nagurney J.T. (2005). Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation
of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. JAMA, 294, 2623-2629.
Servi R.J., Skiendzielewski J.J. (1985). Relief of myocardial ischemia pain with a
gastrointestinal cocktail. Am J Emerg Med, 3, 208-209.
Henrikson C.A., Howell E.E., Bush D.E., et al. (2003). Chest pain relief by nitroglycerin does
not predict active coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med, 139, 979-986.
Brieger D., Eagle K.A., Goodman S.G., et al. GRACE Investigators. (2004). Acute coronary
syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk
group: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Chest, 126, 461-
469.
Canto J.G., Shlipak M.G., Rogers W.J., et al. (2000). Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and
mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain.
JAMA, 283, 3223-3229.
Gregoratos G. (2001). Clinical manifestations of acute myocardial infarction in older
patients. Am J Geriatr Cardiol, 10, 345-347.
Patel H., Rosengren A., Ekman I. (2004). Symptoms in acute coronary syndromes: does sex
make a difference? Am Heart J, 148, 27-33.
Arslanian-Engoren C., Patel A., Fang J., Armstrong D., et al. (2006). Symptoms of men and
women presenting with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2006, 98, 1177-
1181.
DeVon H.A., Ryan C.J., Ochs A.L., Shapiro M. (2008). Symptoms across the continuum of
acute coronary syndromes: differences between women and men. Am J Crit Care,
17, 14-24; quiz 25.
Canto J.G., Goldberg R.J., Hand M.M., Bonow R.O., Sopko G., Pepine C.J., Long T. (2007).
Symptom presentation of women with acute coronary syndromes: myth vs reality.
Arch Intern Med,167, 2405-2413.
Lerner D.J., Kannel W.B. (1986). Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality
in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J, 111,
383-390.
Kannel W.B., Vokonas P.S. (1992). Demographics of the prevalence, incidence, and
management of coronary heart disease in the elderly and in women. Ann
Epidemiol, 2, 5-14.
Stangl V., Witzel V., Baumann G., Stangl K. (2008). Current diagnostic concepts to detect
coronary artery disease in women. Eur Heart J, 29, 707-717.
Alexander K.P., Shaw L.J., Shaw L.K., Delong E.R., Mark D.B., Peterson E.D. (1998). Value of
exercise treadmill testing in women. J Am Coll Cardiol, 32, 1657-1664.
Atypical Presentation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome 115
D'Antono B., Dupuis G., Fortin C., Arsenault A., Burelle D. (2006). Angina symptoms in men
and women with stable coronary artery disease and evidence of exercise-induced
myocardial perfusion defects. Am Heart J, 151, 813-819.
Pepine C.J., Abrams J., Marks R.G., Morris J.J., Scheidt S.S., Handberg E. (1994).
Characteristics of a contemporary population with angina pectoris. TIDES
Investigators. Am J Cardiol, 74, 226-231.
Rutledge T., Reis S.E., Olson M., et al. Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE).
(2001). History of anxiety disorders is associated with a decreased likelihood of
angiographic coronary artery disease in women with chest pain: the WISE study. J
Am Coll Cardiol, 37, 780-785.
Birdwell B.G., Herbers J.E., Kroenke K. (1993). Evaluating chest pain. The patient's
presentation style alters the physician's diagnostic approach. Arch Intern Med, 153,
1991-1995.
Lehmann J.B., Wehner P.S., Lehmann C.U., Savory L.M. (1996). Gender bias in the
evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department. Am J Cardiol, 77, 641-
644.
Anand S.S., Xie C.C., Mehta S., et al. CURE Investigators. (2005). Differences in the
management and prognosis of women and men who suffer from acute coronary
syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol, 46, 1845-1851.
Yu H.T., Kim K.J., Bang W.D., et al. (2011). Gender-based differences in the
management and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome in Korea. Yonsei Med
J, 52, 562-568.
Langer A., Freeman M.R., Josse R.G., Armstrong P.W. (1995). Metaiodobenzyl-
benzolguanidine imaging in diabetes mellitus: assessment of cardiac sympathetic
denervation and its relation to autonomic dysfunction and silent myocardial
ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol, 25, 610-618.
Di Carli M.F., Bianco-Batlles D., Landa M.E., et al. (1999). Effects of autonomic neuropathy
on coronary blood flow in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation, 100, 813-
819.
Stevens M.J., Raffel D.M., Allman K.C., et al. (1998). Cardiac sympathetic dysinnervation
in diabetes: implications for enhanced cardiovascular risk. Circulation, 98, 961-
968.
Ranjadayalan K., Umachandran V., Ambepityia G., Kopelman P.G., Mills P.G., Timmis A.D.
(1990). Prolonged anginal perceptual threshold in diabetes: effects on exercise
capacity and myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol, 16, 1120-1124.
Stern S., Behar S., Leor J., Harpaz D., Boyko V., Gottlieb S. Israeli Working Group on
Intensive Cardiac Care, Israel Heart Society. (2004). Presenting symptoms,
admission electrocardiogram, management, and prognosis in acute coronary
syndromes: differences by age. Am J Geriatr Cardiol, 13, 188-96.
Calle P., Jordaens L., De Buyzere M., Rubbens L., Lambrecht B., Clement D.L. (1994). Age-
related differences in presentation, treatment and outcome of acute myocardial
infarction. Cardiology, 85, 111-20.
116 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Hwang S.Y., Park E.H., Shin E.S., Jeong M.H. (2009). Comparison of factors associated with
atypical symptoms in younger and older patients with acute coronary syndromes. J
Korean Med Sci, 24, 789-94. .
Hwang S.Y., Jeong M.H. (2010). Cognitive factors that influence delayed decision to seek
treatment among older patients with acute myocardial infarction in Korea. Eur J
Cardiovasc Nurs, in-press.
Hwang S.Y., Zerwic J.J., Jeong M.H. (2011). Impact of prodromal symptoms on prehospital
delay in patients with first-time acute myocardial infarction in Korea. J Cardiovasc
Nurs, 26, 194-201.
9
1. Introduction
Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who suffer persistent symptoms and reduced
quality of life while receiving medical therapy are considered for revascularization.1
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are
the most common methods of revascularization for symptomatic CAD. These two
interventions can reduce ischemic symptoms such as angina or dyspnea,2 thus improving
the ability to undertake physical training. Shorter length of hospitalization,3 earlier return to
work,4 and better life adaptation5 were reported in patients undergoing PCI. However, the
incidence rate of restenosis following PCI is higher than CABG,6 and PCI patients who
required further interventions outnumbered the patients who underwent CABG.7-8 A recent
meta-analysis study found that the mortality rate and the rate of revascularization were
significantly lower in the CABG group than the PCI group (9.9% vs 24.5%).9 In a subgroup
analysis, the 5-year mortality rate of DM patients was also lower in the CABG group.
In the era of drug-eluting stent (DES), the Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac
Surgery (SYNTAX) trial10 found that major adverse cardiovascular events rates at 12 months
were significantly higher in the PCI group (17.8% vs 12.4%), and the rate of
revascularization was lower in the CABG group (5.9% vs 13.5%), but stroke was
significantly higher in the CABG group (2.2% vs 0.6%). However, the application of new
surgical technique, such as off-pump CABG (OPCAB) may reduce the rate of stroke after
surgery. In general, CABG remains the method of choice in patients with left main disease,
multivessel disease, especially in diabetic patients, or patients with left ventricular
dysfunction, in the event of failure of PCI, and in-stent restenosis.11 Although the procedure
risk is higher for patients receiving CABG, the extent of revascularization is more
complete,12 and hence the potential of training is higher than patients with PCI. The
objective of this study is to review the effect of exercise training program in patients with
CABG.
15 M, 2 F
6-8 wk aerobic training, v O2peak between baseline and 9
Daida et al18 3 times/wk, 40 min each mon:
53±3 y/o, 3 m after
(1996) time, 21.9 vs 27.4 mL·kg-1·min-1 (25.1%)
CABG
at RPE 12-13 ↑Exercise time, O2 pulse, peak HR
Nakai et al.38 reported the effects of exercise training on recovery of cardiac function in 115
patients after CABG. After training, stroke index increased significantly in the exercise
group, but not in the usual care group. Takeyama et al22 applied a 2-week bicycle program
to 13 patients with CABG, and they exercised 30-minute twice daily. The peak cardiac
output increased 22.9% from 10.6 L/min to 13.4 L/min, while the control group showed no
significant improvement. Adachi et al.23 assigned 34 patients with CABG to a 2-week
exercise program, and cardiac output during exercise at 20 watt and at peak exercise
significantly increased in the exercise group. In a recent study, Bilinska et al30 reported that
after 6 weeks of aerobic training at 70–80% of HRpeak, the stroke volume and cardiac output
were higher (by 13% and 15%, respectively) in trained patients compared with controls.
Goodman et al.21 has explored central and peripheral adaptations after exercise training in
31 patients with CABG. Patients underwent 12 weeks of exercise training consisting of
walking and jogging, at 75% to 80% v O2peak. The results showed a significant improvement
in v O2peak and an increase of the ejection fraction during submaximal exercise (60 ± 3% vs 63
± 2% at 40% v O2peak; 61 ± 3% vs 64 ± 3% at 70% v O2peak). Peak ischemic exercise calf blood
flow and vascular conductance were also increased. The result indicated that exercise
training in patients after CABG can elicit significant improvements in functional capacity
that, for the most part, are secondary to peripheral adaptations, with lesser contribution of
central adaptation.
improve LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol in CABG patients with metabolic syndrome.
Additionally, metabolic scoring defined by the number of the modified Adult Treatment
Panel criteria of the US National Cholesterol Education Program was significantly
improved.
work capacity higher, and more patients had continued with regular physical training (66%
vs 46%). Hedbäck et al.43 reported in a study included 49 patients who underwent CABG
and were offered a CR program consisting of education in risk-factor control and a physical
training program. After 10 years of follow up, the study group had lower cardiac events
than in the control group (18.4% versus 34.7%). The number of readmissions to hospital (2.1
versus 3.5 per patient) and length of admissions (11 versus 26 days per patient) were
significantly lower in the study group. The result proved that a comprehensive CR program
after CABG will improve long-term prognosis and reduce the need for hospital care.
In a recent study, Plüss et al.44 randomized 224 patients with acute myocardial infarction or
undergoing CABG to expanded CR (a one-year stress management program, increased
physical training, staying at a 'patient hotel' for five days after the event, and cooking
sessions), or to standard CR. The number of cardiovascular events was reduced in the
expanded CR group compared with the standard CR (47.7% versus 60.2%). This was mainly
because of a reduction of myocardial infarctions in the expanded CR group. Days at hospital
for cardiovascular reasons were significantly reduced in patients who received expanded
CR (median 6 days) compared with standard CR (median 10 days). The result showed that
expanded CR reduces cardiovascular morbidity and days at hospital.
In a recent study, Angelini et al.46 reported the graft patency 6-8 years after CABG was
similar between OPCAB and CABG-CPB, and the major adverse cardiovascular events or
death showed no difference between the two groups. The health-related quality of life was
similar between the OPCAB and CABG-CPB groups. In addition, with increasing expertise
and technology, minimally invasive and robotic techniques have been developed to enhance
post-operative recovery and patient satisfaction.47 However, there is no study compare the
effect of exercise training on conventional CABG and those new techniques, further study is
needed to evaluate the difference between conventional and new surgical techniques to the
outcomes in patients with CABG.
6. Conclusion
Short-term exercise training for patients with CABG showed benefits to cardiorespiratory
function, muscular strength, metabolic profile, cardiac function, ventilatory efficiency,
hemodynamic function and quality of life. Additionally, exercise training may improve graft
patency, reduce cardiac events and readmission rate. Thus, CR exercise training is an
important intervention and should be recommended to most of the patients after CABG.
7. References
[1] Hamm CW, Reimers J, Ischinger T, et al. A randomized study of coronary angioplasty
compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary
disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1037-43.
[2] Bourassa MG, Knatterud GL, Pepine CJ, et al. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot
(ACIP) Study. Improvement of cardiac ischemia at 1 year after PTCA and CABG.
Circulation 1995;92:II1-II7.
[3] Holmes DR, Vlietstra RE, Mock MB. Employment and recreation patterns in patients
treated by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a multicenter study.
Am J Cardiol 2000;52:710-3.
[4] Holmes DR, Jr., Van Raden MJ, Reeder GS, et al. Return to work after coronary
angioplasty: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Am J Cardiol
1984;53:48C-51C.
[5] Raft D, McKee DC, Popio KA, et al. Life adaptation after percutaneous transluminal
coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol
1985;56:395-8.
[6] Popma JJ, Califf RM, Topol EJ. Clinical trials of restenosis after coronary angioplasty.
Circulation 1991;84:1426-36.
[7] Five-year clinical and functional outcome comparing bypass surgery and angioplasty in
patients with multivessel coronary disease. A multicenter randomized trial.
Writing Group for the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI)
Investigators. JAMA 1997;277:715-21.
[8] King SB, III, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS, et al. A randomized trial comparing coronary
angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery
Trial (EAST) N Engl J Med 1994;331:1044-50.
[9] Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Bravata DM, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery
compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a
126 Acute Coronary Syndromes
collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet
2009; 373: 1190–97
[10] Serruys PW, Morice, MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention
versus coronary artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J
Med 2009; 360: 961-72.
[11] Hannan EL, Racz, MJ, Gary Walford G, et al. Long-term outcomes of coronary artery
bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2174-83.
[12] Whitlow PL, Dimas AP, Bashore TM, et al. Relationship of extent of revascularization
with angina at one year in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation
(BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1750-9.
[13] American College of Sports Medicine: Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Exercise
Prescription. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 2010.
[14] Kavanagh T, Mertens DJ, Hamm LF, et al. Prediction of long-term prognosis in 12,169
men referred for cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation 2002;106:666-71.
[15] Haennel RG, Quinney AH, Kappagoda CT. Effects of hydraulic circuit training
following coronary artery bypass surgery. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991;23:158-65.
[16] Engblom E, Hietanen EK, Hämäläinen H, et al. Exercise habits and physical
performance during comprehensive rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass
surgery. Eur Heart J 1992;13:1053-9.
[17] Dubach P, Myers J, Dziekan G, et al. Effect of residential cardiac rehabilitation following
bypass surgery. Chest 1995;108:134-9.
[18] Daida H, Squires RW, Allison TG, et al. Sequential assessment of exercise tolerance in
heart transplantation compared with coronary artery bypass surgery after phase II
cardiac rehabilitation. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77:696-700.
[19] Mariorana AJ, Briffa TG, Goodman C, et al. A controlled trial of circuit weight training
on aerobic capacity and myocardial oxygen demand in men after coronary artery
bypass surgery. J cardiopulm Rehabil 1997;17:239-47.
[20] Lan C, Chen SY, Lai JS, et al. The effect of Tai Chi on cardiorespiratory function in
patients with coronary artery bypass surgery. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;31:634-8.
[21] Goodman JM, Pallandi DV, Reading JR, et al. Central and peripheral adaptations after
12 weeks of exercise training in post-coronary artery bypass surgery patients. J
Cardiopulm Rehabil 1999;19:144-50.
[22] Takeyama J, Itoh H, Kato M, et al. Effect of physical training on the recovery of the
autonomic nervous activity during exercise after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Jpn Circ J 2000; 64:809-13.
[23] Adachi H, Itoh H, Sakurai S, et al. Short-term physical training improves ventilatory
response to exercise after coronary arterial bypass surgery. Jpn Circ J 2001; 65: 419–
23.
[24] Kodis J, Smith KM, Arthur HM, et al. Changes in exercise capacity and lipid after clinic
versus home-based aerobic training in coronary artery bypass graft surgery
patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2001;21:31-6.
[25] Lan C, Chen SY, Hsu CJ, et al. Improvement of cardiorespiratory function in patients
with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass
grafting during outpatient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:336-41.
[26] Chuang TY, Sung WH, Lin CY. Application of a virtual reality-enhanced exercise
protocol in patients after coronary bypass. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1929-32.
Exercise Training for Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery 127
[27] Sumide T, Shimada K, Ohmura H, et al. Relationship between exercise tolerance and
muscle strength following cardiac rehabilitation: comparison of patients after
cardiac surgery and patients with myocardial infarction. J Cardiol 2009; 54: 273-81.
[28] Moholdt TT, Amundsen BH, Rustad LA, et al. Aerobic interval training versus
continuous moderate exercise after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized
study of cardiovascular effects and quality of life. Am Heart J 2009;158:1031-7
[29] Onishi T, Shimada K, Sunayama S, et al. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with
metabolic syndrome after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiol 2009;53:381-7.
[30] Bilinska M, Kosydar-Piechna M, Gasiorowska A, et al. Influence of dynamic training on
hemodynamic, neurohormonal responses to static exercise and on inflammatory
markers in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circ J 2010;74:2598-604.
[31] Shabani R, Gaeini AA, Nikoo MR, et al. Effect of cardiac rehabilitation program on
exercise capacity in women undergoing coronary artery bypass graft in hamadan-
iran. Int J Prev Med 2010;1:247-51.
[32] Smith KM, McKelvie RS, Thorpe KE, et al. Six-year follow-up of a randomized
controlled trial examining hospital versus home-based exercise training after
coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart 2011;97:1169-74.
[33] Kelemen MH, Stewart KJ, Gillilan RE, et al. Circuit weight training in cardiac patients. J
Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:38-42.
[34] McCartney N, McKelvie RS, Haslam DR, et al. Usefulness of weightlifting training in
improving strength and maximal power output in coronary artery disease. Am J
Cardiol 1991;67:939-45.
[35] Hagberg JM, Eshani AA, Holloszy JO. Effect of 12 months of intense exercise training
on stroke volume in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1983; 1194-9.
[36] Ehsani AA, Biello DR, Schultz J, et al. Improvement of left ventricular contractile
function by exercise training in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation
1986; 64: 1116-24.
[37] Laslett LJ, Paumer L, Ammsterdam EA. Increases in myocardial oxygen consumption
indexes by exercise training at onset of ischemia in patients with coronary artery
disease. Circulation 1985; 72: 958-62.
[38] Nakai Y, Kataoka Y, Bando M, et al. Effects of physical exercise training on cardiac
function and graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 1987;93:65-72.
[39] Wosornu D, Bedford D, Ballantyne D. A comparison of the effects of strength and
aerobic exercise training on exercise capacity and lipids after coronary artery
bypass surgery. Eur Heart J 1996;17:854-63.
[40] Heather AM, Daniels C, Mckelvie R, et al. Effect of a preoperative intervention on
preoperative and postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective
coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:253-62.
[41] Brügemann J, Poels BJ, Oosterwijk MH et al. A randomized controlled trial of cardiac
rehabilitation after revascularisation. Int J Cardiol. 2007;119:59-64.
[42] Perk J, Hedbäck B, Engvall J. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery
bypass grafting on readmissions, return to work, and physical fitness. A case-
control study. Scand J Soc Med 1990;18:45-51.
128 Acute Coronary Syndromes
[43] Hedbäck B, Perk J, Hörnblad M, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery
bypass surgery: 10-year results on mortality, morbidity and readmissions to
hospital. J Cardiovasc Risk 2001;8:153-8.
[44] Plüss CE, Billing E, Held C, et al. Long-term effects of an expanded cardiac
rehabilitation programme after myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass
surgery: a five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil
2011;25:79-87.
[45] Channer KS, Barrow D, Barrow R, et al. Changes in hemodynamic parameters
following Tai Chi Chuan and aerobic exercise in patients recovering from acute
myocardial infarction. Postgrad Med J 1996;72:349-51.
[46] Angelini GD, Culliford L, Smith DK, et el. Effects of on- and off-pump coronary artery
surgery on graft patency, survival, and health-related quality of life: long-term
follow-up of 2 randomized controlled trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:295-
303.
[47] Atluri P, Kozin ED, Hiesinger W, et al. Off-pump, minimally invasive and robotic
coronary revascularization yield improved outcomes over traditional on-pump
CABG. Int J Med Robot 2009;5:1-12.
10
1. Introduction
The cardiac risk (CR) in noncardiac surgery represents the probability of acute
cardiovascular conditions appearance, assessed as perioperative complications.
The most frequent perioperative complications are the acute manifestations of coronary or
noncoronary ischemia; acute or exacerbated chronic heart failure (CHF); acute rhythm and
conductive disorders; acute cardiac inflammatory processes; increased arterial blood
pressure or hypertensive crisis; cardiogenic shock and sudden cardiac death. These
conditions are either early signs, or represent a manifestation of progress or decompensation
of present cardiac diseases. Specific indication may be found in their origin, if it is explicitly
or implicitly associated with the present surgical disease or with a completed surgical
intervention, giving weight to the special features of the perioperative period [1].
The major surgical interventions, e.g. in the thoracic cavity and the upper abdominal cavity,
as well as the neurosurgical and the major orthopedic operations, are related to increased
CR. Previous myocardial infarction, unstable stenocardia and decompressed chronic cardiac
insufficiency are powerful predictors for the emergence of acute perioperative
cardiovascular complications (CVC) and mortality. The patients with such specified
pathologies need additional evaluation before major surgical intervention.
The cardiac postoperative morbidity and mortality are closely related to the basic surgical
disease and the corresponding intervention. Many scientific publications report on the high
number of complications, accompanying the major surgical abdominal and intrathoracic
interventions, emergency surgical interventions, surgery of malignant neoplasm, major
peripheral vascular manipulations [1, 2, 3].
The CR evaluation will not change the course and the result of the intervention in emergency
conditions, e.g. rupture of abdominal aortic aneurism, heavy trauma, perforations etc., but
may have influence upon the care during the early postoperative period. In emergency but
noncritical states (e.g. biliary obstruction), the evaluation may contribute to risk reduction
without influence upon the decision about the necessity of the intervention. In some cases, the
CR evaluation may influence the surgical intervention planning and the choice of less invasive
130 Acute Coronary Syndromes
intervention, e.g. the preference for peripheral arterial angioplasty before infrainguinal bypass,
even though the long-term result of the surgery may be altered. In other cases, the CR
assessment must support the decision for a given intervention, e.g. for removal of small
aneurisms from asymptomatic patients with carotidal stenosis, when the compromise is
between the expected life duration and the risk of the intervention.
Below are presented some practices for cardiac risk assessment in emergency noncardiac
surgery, including high risk one. Part of them are discussed on the basis of own studies over
the applicability of models for CP evaluation in groups of subjects, differentiated upon the
urgency, the severity of the surgical disease and intervention, with or without
cardiovascular and other concomitant nonsurgical diseases [4, 5, 6, 7].
1. Chronic imbalance between the need and the providing of blood stream that is clinically
manifested as stable IHD (due to coronary arteries’ stenosis, limiting the blood stream);
2. Rupture of coronary plaque with clinical manifestation of acute coronary syndrome
(ACS).
c. Patients with high risk of asymptomatic IHD.
Such are the patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or peripheral vascular disease, when
either the ECG stress-test cannot be carried out, or the results obtained are not reliable.
High risk of the supraventricular tachiarrhythmias progress subsists among elderly patients
subjected to pulmonary surgery, patients with subcrucial valvular stenosis and patients
with primary anamnesis of similar tachyarrhythmias [24].
Patients with anomalies in the conductive system as AV block, fascicular or bundle branch
block often have cardiac diseases. Many anesthetics suppress the cardiac contractility
and/or provoke peripheral vasodilatation. The anesthesia may give rise to further
depression of the automatism and, consequently, of the ventricular frequency in patients
with heart block. The complication of biphascicular block after MI may progress to a third
degree AV block, often accompanied by serious hemodynamic disorders [24, 25].
Patients with bundle branch blocks are not subject to increased risk of third degree AV block
progress in the perioperative period, although they may acquire it in a long-term context.
The presence of bundle branch block does not represent an independent predictor of heavy
postoperative cardiac complications if there is no evidence of other severe disease [15, 20].
According to the recommendations of the ACC/AHA the arrhythmias with high risk are as
followed [2]:
- high-degree AV block;
- symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias, combined with presence of cardiovascular
diseases (CVD);
- supraventricular arrhythmias at high and out-off-control heart rate (HR).
2.1.6 Cardiomyopathies
The hypertrophic cardiomyopathy raises some specific problems. The reduction of the blood
volume, the decreased vascular system resistance and the increased venous volume can
reduce the left ventricular volume and increase the tendency towards obstruction of the left
ventricular output tract. In addition, the decreased pressure of the ventricular filling may
lead to considerable reduction of stroke volume, due to reduced compliance of the
hypertrophic ventricle.
Risk Evaluation of Perioperative Acute Coronary Syndromes and
Other Cardiovascular Complications During Emergency High Risky Noncardiac Surgery 133
the body temperature, the loss of blood and the body liquids exchange. The intervention
emergency represents an issue of special importance. The survival rate increases twofold
with preoperative intensive cardiac care that is related to eventual delayed emergency
intervention, whenever that is possible [37]. Each surgery provokes a stress reaction, due
to tissue damages and is mediated by neuroendocrine factors that may lead to
tachycardia and hypertension. The perioperative stress reaction includes effusion of
catecholamine, provoked by the hemodynamic stress, vasospasm, reduced fibrinolitic
activity, activated trombocytes and extracoagulation. Coronary plaque rupture leads to
thromboses and subsequent vessel occlusion, which are important factors for the
occurrence perioperative ACS. The MI among patients with significant IHD may be a
result of a continuous imbalance between the available and the necessary myocardial
blood steam (in cases of tachycardia and increased myocardial contractility). Studies on
performed autopsies, demonstrate that half of the fatal MI have directly destroyed
plaque fissure, rupture or plaque bleeding. Although the specific patient factors are more
important for cardiac risk prediction than the surgical ones, the type of the surgical
intervention cannot be ignored.
2.1.9.2 Type of the anesthesia
Recent studies indicate, that the operative period is more reliable than it was in the past,
mostly because of the careful monitoring of hemodynamics and respiration during the
anesthesia [20]. No data are available for determining some significant differences in the
severity of the cardiac complications due to the different anesthesia techniques. However,
the assessment of the type and the conditions of the anesthesia may have important
implications for the cardiac risk prognosis.
2.2 Indices and scales for cardiac risk evaluation and their applicability on cardiac
risk assessment in patients with emergency high risky noncardiac surgery
The preoperative assessment of cardiac risk during noncardiac surgery (specifically for
emergency surgery) is based on quantitative indices and rated scales. They were proposed
and introduced initially for assessment of the anesthesiology risk and consequently, for the
cardiac one [20, 23, 38, 39].
The synthesis of methods for preoperative cardiac risk assessment began intensively at the
end of the seventies, as a result of the communication by Goldman et al [17, 19, 20, 23, 40, 41,
42, 43, 44, 45, 46]. The methods and indices for the cardiac risk assessment can be
characterized as:
- common for CR [20, 25, 27, 42];
- specifically related to the risk of ischemic complications – underestimated by Goldman
et al, although it is the most dynamic and dangerous risk factor (RF) [17,19, 40, 41, 43,
44, 45, 46].
From another point of view, the methods and indices for cardiac risk assessment are:
- quantitative [20, 23, 27];
- qualitative [17, 19, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47].
Later on, diagrams and tables for risk assessment of ischemic complications [19, 41, 43], life-
threatening ischemic complications [17, 36, 44, 45], tachyarrhythmias [24], and
ventricular arrhythmias [49] were proposed. The scales and the statements about the
probability of ischemic complications comprise of several symptoms, derived from
clinical, laboratory, imaging, and electrophysiological examinations. Hopf and Tarnow
[41] propose intraoperative ECG monitoring, transesophageal echocardiography, which
is a semi-invasive and expensive method, cardio-kymography, radio-marked
erythrocytes and small gamma camera, as well as metabolic parameters. Lette et al [43]
reach the conclusion that the clinical parameters can not predict incoming ischemic
incidents. They accentuate on dipyridamole-thallium scintigraphy. Leppo [19] includes
ECG examinations, treadmill, stress-echocardiography with dobutamine or exercise,
thallium scintigraphy with test burden in the preoperative assessment. Symptomatic
angina, CHF, survived MI, ventricular extrasystoles, and age over 70 years, are also
taken into consideration.
Mangano et al [50] evaluate the significance of the following clinic symptoms, related to the
appearance of post-operative ischemic complications: 1) presence of left ventricular
hypertrophy in ECG; 2) remoteness of the arterial hypertension; 3) diabetes mellitus; 4)
manifested IHD; 5) HF needing the use of digoxine. According to the presence of the five
preoperative symptoms for postoperative ischemia, the probability of its perioperative
appearance is divided into 5 levels: without any symptom presence – 22%; presence of one
symptom – 31%; 46% with two symptoms; 70% with three; 77% with four symptoms.
Other studies of the same authors emphasize the significance of the following conditions,
contributing to unfavorable outcomes from ischemic complications [44, 45]:
1. intraoperative hypotension and tachycardia (the assessment of hypertension is
contradictory);
2. appearance of acute ischemic events in the postoperative period (acute MI), unstable
stenocarida or ECG ischemia. Note that CHF and ventricular tachycardia are not
associated with unfavorable outcomes;
3. instrumentally determined intra- and postoperative changes: appearance of ECG
ischemia (doubles the MI risk); increases of the endmost left camera diastolic pressure
that are accepted as evidence of ischemia - note that the mean pulmo-capillary pressure
and the diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure do not correlate with the incidents;
segmental disorder of the left camera wall assessed by transesophageal
echocardiography - that is accepted as the most sensitive predictor [51], although the
same authors specify later on, that transesophageal echocardiography weakly correlates
with postoperative complications;
4. the presence of AH, heavy limiting lung disease, creatinine clearance lower than 0.8
ml/s – factors independently associated with high risk of cardiac death [45]. The death
probability is 80% when two or more factors are present.
If the total rate of complications with all monitored patients is 12%, then 24% of those with
old MI or cardiomegaly have postoperative complications – cardiac death, acute MI,
ischemia. The rate of patients without the mentioned consequences is only 7% [52].
A standard for CR assessment during noncardiac surgeries [22, 53, 54] was adopted, on the
basis of the debates, concerning the applicability of the schemes and indices for CR
assessment and the ACC/AHA proposals [22, 53, 54]. According to it, CR is further divided
into three groups – high, moderate, and low, depending on the severity of the perioperative
Risk Evaluation of Perioperative Acute Coronary Syndromes and
Other Cardiovascular Complications During Emergency High Risky Noncardiac Surgery 137
CVC and the probability of a fatal outcome; the significance of the clinical predictors is
determined, as well as the volume and type of the surgery.
1. Risk, related to CVD:
a. high:
the unstable coronary syndromes – new MI and unstable stenocardia;
the decompensated HF;
the significant arrhythmias – high-degree AV block, symptomatic ventricular
arrhythmias accompanying cardiac disease, as well as supraventricular arrhythmias
with uncontrolled HR;
critical valvular cardiac lesion.
b. moderate:
stable stenocardia – I-II FC;
old MI or present pathological Q wave in ECG ;
compensated HF;
diabetes mellitus.
c. lower:
advanced in years;
ECG abnormalities;
non-sinus rhythm;
bad functional capacity;
past apoplexy;
uncontrolled arterial hypertension.
2. Risk, related to surgical intervention:
a. high:
emergency major interventions, specifically with elderly patients;
aortic and other major vessel interventions;
peripherally vessel surgeries;
extended surgeries, accompanied by loss of many liquids and blood .
b. moderate:
carotid endarteriectomy;
cranial and vertebral surgeries;
intraperitoneal and intrathoracic surgeries;
orthopedic surgeries;
prostate surgery.
c. lower:
endoscope procedures;
procedures on the body surface;
cataract and breast surgeries.
The ACC/AHA classification merits consist of classification of the risk categories, as well as
the consideration of the cardiac state and type of surgery. Are specified the rhythm
disorders, the low risk predictors and the pathological ECG findings.
There are several investigations and analyses on the applicability of the CR indices
evaluation [1, 11], including such on large number of patients [23]. Basic disadvantages of
indices are the high percent of false-positive conclusions [38] and the impossibility of
obtaining accurate diagnosis and assessment of the most serious and dynamic RF – the
ischemia, with pain or silent [9, 31, 45, 56]. The CR indices do not determine the appearance
138 Acute Coronary Syndromes
probability of acute ischemic incidents [9, 31, 57] and that is what significantly affects the
reliability of the cardiac death prognosis.
The point indices of Goldman et al and Larsen et al include the emergency and the operation
volume in the criteria set for the index calculation, but with the lowest possible weights: 4
and 3 with Goldman et al (in the assessment range from 3 through 11) and 3 and 3 with
Larsen et al (in the range from 3 through 12). The detailed analysis of the two schemes gives
a satisfactory answer to both the low discrimination coefficients (used for calculation of the
emergency and severity of the surgery with both models), and their unavoidable presence
among the criteria. Table 1.1 details systematically the required data.
major intervention rates to the total number of interventions. We devoted special attention
to that fact, in our targeted study [5, 6] introducing the so called “Exceeding Indices.” The
Exceeding Index, applied to the emergency surgeries (EIES) expresses the quotient (in
percent) between the relative rate of the heavy cardiac complications (including cardiac
death) accompanying the emergency surgeries (HCCES), towards the total number of heavy
cardiac complications (HCC), and the relative rate of the emergency surgeries (ES) towards
the total number of surgeries (TNS):
deficient in direct criteria for cardiac status evaluation; this fact is relevant to a greater extent
for Goldman’s model.
The relative advantages of Larsen’s model may be well explained by the adequately
introduced cardiac status criteria. The IHD assessment criterion includes: 1) MI presence
during the 3 last months (Goldberger et al specify 6 months); 2) older infarction or angina
pectoris (missing in Goldberger’s model). The data analysis shows that the second index,
even appreciated by 3 points only, is significantly more frequent, about 15% of the cases
with critical patient complications. At the same time, MI presence during the last 3 or 6
months (indices with high value, 10 and 11 in both models, respectively) is recorded with
one patient, who did not demonstrate perioperative complications. Our interpretation is that
the recent (and generally severe) cardiovascular incidents have no explicit contribution to
the risk evaluation, since they are subject to therapeutic monitoring. This is not the case with
patients with chronic and mild incidents and generally more distant in time CVD and their
complications. In emergency cases, the possibilities for correction are missing, that are
inherent to planed surgery, even when the complications are under- or decompensated.
Considerable contribution to the cardiac risk assessment in the model of Larsen et al, have
indices characterizing in aggregate the “heart failure” criterion. Within the investigated by
us patient group, with present or preceding pulmonary stagnation, heart failure is a
considerably more frequent postoperative CVC. The conclusion is highly valid among
patients with stagnations, confirmed by X-ray examination. In such cases, the corresponding
cardiac risk assessment increases by 12 points (at persistent pulmonary stagnation) or by 8
points (without stagnation but with preceding pulmonary edema).
Important for the correct cardiac risk evaluation are the cases, offering indices for combined
criteria, that are assessed by low point amounts from 2 to 4, such as preceding HF without
stagnation or edema; preceding IHD with or without old MI; diabetes; increased serum
creatinine. The combination of three of the mentioned indications, accompanying the
emergency abdominal surgeries (very common case in practice), leads to a risk increase in
the range of 12 through 50%.
Special comment is needed on diabetes, included as a indicator in Larsen’s model. In addition
to the specific complication, diabetes is associated with the IHD. Introduction of diabetes in
cardiac risk evaluation is appropriate, bearing in mind its frequency. It was encountered in
22.4% of the patients, examined by us. The percent of the heavy CVC in patients with diabetes
is 14.5. In comparison, it is 8 with patients with mild CVC complications.
The discussion on the applicability of the index models does not cover the problems related
to the adequate evaluation of the used criteria constellations for CR assessment in
emergency noncardiac surgery. Evidently, there are other criteria, which reliably predict
(directly or indirectly) the probability of cardiovascular incidents during the perioperative
period.
perioperative one [60]. When the preoperative ischemia is determined by two-days of ECG
monitoring, the perioperative complications are specified as 18%, 21% of them being cardiac
death, AMI, and unstable stenocardia; 35% are HF; 44% - ventricular tachycardia [9]. The
influence of the real and relative myocardial ischemia on perioperative CVC appearance is
evident. Therefore, it is useful to associate the CR evaluation with the ECG determined ST-
depression. The introduction of an index for CR assessment provides an understandable
and objective method for CVC risk determination in cases of preoperative ECG manifested
myocardial ischemia (MMI) during emergency noncardiac surgeries. This paragraph
presents a synthesis of the cardiac risk assessment index (CRI) for CVC prediction in the
postoperative period, based on ST-depression in preoperative ECG, as an expression of
real/relative myocardial ischemia.
Data obtained by monitoring the disease process within a group of 466 patients is used for
CRI synthesis. The patients have been emergency treated against acute abdominal surgical
diseases or abdominal traumas. The patient distribution within the investigated surgical
nosological groups (ING) is presented in increasing order of surgical disease (SD) severity in
Table 2.1.
The CRI synthesis is related to assessment and comparison of the CVC rate of patients with
and without MMI in the ING. CVC appeared in 169 (36.3%) of ING patients: 51 (64.5%) of
them with MMI and the remaining 118 (30.9%) – without MMI. The statistically significant
difference (р<0.001) shows that MMI is an important RF. This general evaluation of the MMI
influence on the patients in the postoperative period has to be specified for ING in
increasing order of their severity. Table 2.2 presents the CVC rate (in percent) found in ING
patients with and without MMI.
The frequency of CVC in patients without MMI marks the anticipated increasing trend in
accordance with the increased SD severity – from the low 5.5% among patients with acute
appendicitis, through the significant 33, 34, and 35% for patients with hernia, abdominal and
biliary-pancreatic diseases, to the high 54% related to acute states, provoked by pathologies
of the lower part of the gastrointestinal tract.
The CVC rates in patients with MMI are obviously higher, but as a trend, they do not repeat the
monotonic CVC rate increase with SD deterioration of patients without MMI. A characteristic
peak may be observed in group B (77%); high rate in group E (71%); limited increase in С (62%)
and D (65%) groups. Group A remains with the most rare CVC cases (40%).
The statistically significant difference between the CVC rates in ING, among patients with
and without MMI, underlines the specificity of the two trends. Significant, even at different
levels, are the differences in groups A, B, C and D. The high level (р<0.005) in group B
corresponds to the highest recorded increase of the CVC rate, when comparing the results of
patients with and without MMI (from 33% to 77%). The differences in groups A and D
(р<0.005) are also derived with high significance, due to the considerable CVC percentage
among the MMI patients. At the same time, the difference in group E between the CVC rate
among patients with and without MMI is not significant.
The analysis of the trends in the CVC rates demonstrates the necessity of a detailed
discussion on the MMI influence as an ING risk factor.
The CVC are separated as lethal and nonlethal, depending on the recorded disease outcome.
Nonlethal CVC appeared in 136 (29.2%) patients of the investigated group: 38 (48.1%) of
them with and 98 (25.3%) without MMI. Lethal CVC were observed in 33 (7.1%) patients, 13
(16.5%) with and 20 (5.2%) without MMI.
142 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Complicated hernia B 92
Gastro-duodenal C 84
Hepatopancreatobiliary D 108
Mechanical icterus
Intestinal E 80
Benignant ileus
Malignant ileus
Mesenteric thrombosis
Table 2.1. The patient distribution of the surgical nosological groups in increasing order of
severity.
Risk Evaluation of Perioperative Acute Coronary Syndromes and
Other Cardiovascular Complications During Emergency High Risky Noncardiac Surgery 143
The differentiated MMI evaluation as a risk factor, reveals its different contribution to the
critical complications structure (lethal and nonlethal) of ING patients with and without
MMI. Both ratios equal zero due to lack of lethal CVC in group A. In this group, with low
severity SD, MMI is a risk factor only in cases of mild complications.
In group B, despite the lesser level of significant difference (р<0.1), MMI stands out as a
factor emphasizing the CVC and their prognoses. In groups with increased severity SD (C
and D) this difference is p<0.05,which is convincing proof of the MMI importance for the
CVC structuring. The significance of the MMI contribution has its logical maximum
(р<0.001) with the CVC appearances and outcomes in group E, the group with considerable
surgical severity.
The results obtained, outlining the role of MMI as a risk factor of increased severity of CVC
rate in SD with increased severity, need specification of the factor, which underlines the
specifics of the nonlethal CVC rate trend among MMI patients, reflected also in the structure
of the total number of CVC.
The role of age as risk factor in CVC appearance and their complicated duration is known.
We will limit our scope to clarification of its specific contribution to the CVC structure in the
ING, thus evaluating the CVC risk among patients with and without MMI. The highest
mean age of such patients is recoded with the lowest level of significance in group B - 69
and 75 years, respectively, with the lowest level of significance of p<0,05. This expressed
high and near mean age in both types of patients in group B, may be well interpreted by the
SD nature – the complicated abdominal hernias. The age discrimination among patients
with and without MMI (37 and 58 years) is most expressed in group A, where the
significance level of difference is high: p<0.005. Practically the patients of this group are
clustered in two sets – young without MMI and elderly with MMI. Such clusters have
considerably nearer values in groups C, D and E (61 and 68 years, 55 and 63 years, 62 and 72
years, respectively) that determines the lower significance levels of difference. The mean age
of MMI patients in the very serious SD (group E) is relatively high (72 years) and come close
to that in group B.
The low surgical severity group A of MMI patients often contains nonlethal CVC; it is
characterized by a relatively high mean age. Such age, combined with MMI, determines the
frequency peak of the nonlethal CVC in group B, which also consists of relatively low
surgical severity SD. The lethal CVC are more frequent in group E, because of the
considerable surgical severity SD and the high mean age of the MMI group; the nonlethal
CVC rates among patients with and without MMI are equaled. In comparison to MMI, the
age has prevalent importance towards the appearance of nonlethal CVC, in the cases
discussed above.
The performed analysis and the results obtained allow quantitative assessment of the
increasing risk of CVC in patients with MMI in ING, taking into consideration the age
profile, expressed by indices synthesis: general – for prognosis of all CVC, and specific – for
the lethal CVC prognosis only. Based on the related to the SD groups content of Table 2.2:
1. relation between rates of all CVC in patients with and without MMI
(FAC+MMI/FAC-MMI)SD;
2. mean ages of patients with and without MMI
(MA+MMI/MA-MMI)SD,
Risk Evaluation of Perioperative Acute Coronary Syndromes and
Other Cardiovascular Complications During Emergency High Risky Noncardiac Surgery 145
we can constitute a relation between the rates of all CVC in patients with and without MMI,
adjusted to the corresponding mean ages:
TCRISD = (FAC+MMI/FAC-MMI)SD/(MA+MMI/MA-MMI)SD
The last equation is the total, age-corrected CRI, which gives assessment of the MMI “net
contribution” to the increased risk of CVC appearance individually in each SD group, and is
relevant for a “conditional” patient whose age is equal to the mean age within the group.
The MMI assessment of a given patient is corrected by the ratio between his own age (PA)
and the mean age within the MMI group of SD:
P(TCRISD) = TCRISD*(PA/MA+MMI)
This formula can be used for interval assessments of the general CRI in ING, according to
the recommended by the WHO age intervals for patient grouping – Table 2.3.
Analogously, one may assess the specific CRI, related to lethal CVC prediction by the equation
LCRISD = (FLC+MMI/FLC-MMI)SD/(MA+MMI/MA-MMI)SD
and its personalized value
P(LCRISD) = LCRISD*(PA/MA+MMI),
where FLC+MMI and FLC-MMI are the presented in Table 2.3 lethal CVC rates of patients with
and without MMI.
Table 2.4 contains the age interval assessments (compliant with WHO recommendations) of
the specific CRI in the SD groups. The trend towards increasing the value of the index can
be clearly followed as a function of the severity of the SD.
The research conducted, leads to the following conclusions. The CVC prediction during
emergency surgeries is very important, due to the exceptionally high CVC rate – 45% in the
investigated patient groups. In its turn, the significantly higher CVC rate among patients with
MMI proves that it is an independent, important and leading risk factor. In this context, MMI
determines not only the probability of occurrence, but also the CVC severity: fully nonlethal
(group A); predominantly nonlethal (groups B, C, D); predominantly lethal (group E).
The rate trends of the nonlethal (low severity) and lethal (considerable severity)
complications among patients in the SD groups with and without MMI take into
consideration the age influence, since it can not be disregarded in risk factor evaluation.
Therefore, the MMI presence qualitatively determines the following, influenced by the age
CVC risks:
- group A (low surgical severity): rare and mild CVC in young patients, who dominate in
the group; relatively frequent, but mild CVC among the more elderly;
- group B (relatively low surgical severity): high rate of mild CVC due to the specific high
mean age;
- groups C and D (increased surgical severity): increased probability of mild CVC with
the age increase; increased probability of high severity CVC with the SD severity
increase;
- group E (considerable surgical severity): high probability of high severity CVC, due to
the specific high mean age; the risk of mild CVC is identical in patients with and
without MMI.
146 Acute Coronary Syndromes
A 1,4 - 3,2 3,2 - 4,3 4,3 - 5,1 5,1 - 5,9 5,9 - 7,1 > 7,1
B 0,5 - 1,1 1,1 - 1,5 1,5 - 1,8 1,8 - 2,1 2,1 - 2,5 > 2,5
C 0,4 - 0,95 0,95 - 1,3 1,3 - 1,5 1,5 - 1,8 1,8 - 2,2 > 2,2
D 0,5 - 1,2 1,2 - 1,7 1,7 - 2,0 2,0 - 2,3 2,3 - 2,7 > 2,7
E 0,3 - 0,6 0,6 - 0,8 0,8 - 1,0 1,0 - 1,1 1,1 - 1,4 > 1,4
Table 2.3. Values of TCRI according to surgery groups and age intervals
A 0 0 0 0 0 0
B 0,06 - 0,13 0,13 - 0,18 0,18 - 0,22 0,22 - 0,25 0,25 - 0,30 > 0,30
C 0,13 - 0,31 0,31 - 0,43 0,43 - 0,50 0,50 - 0,59 0,59 - 0,73 > 0,73
D 0,22 - 0,53 0,53 - 0,75 0,75 - 0,88 0,88 - 1,01 1,01 - 1,19 > 1,19
E 0,30 - 0,60 0,60 - 0,80 0,80 - 1,00 1,00 - 1,10 1,10 - 1,40 > 1,40
Table 2.4. Values of LCRI according to surgery groups and age intervals
cover the three periods of the disease process: preoperative, intraoperative and
postoperative. Each indicator has its own structure of category-related or quantitative
values, appropriately coded to be processed through a multidimensional statistical
approach. We used discriminant analysis (DA) for the synthesis of rules, allowing
quantitative evaluation of the CVC risk appearance probability, during the intra- and
postoperative periods. The categorisation of individual patients to the CVC group with a
given CR level, or to the group without CVC, is performed by substituting the patient’s
indicators values in the linear discriminator. The patient belongs to the control group if the
discriminator value is below the limit. Such are the operated patients without perioperative
CVC, even only with transient CVD or abnormal values of some indicators related to the
cardiovascular system. Discriminator value above the limit classified the patient to the
corresponding risk level group. The hypothesis about CVC appearance with higher risk
level is verified by the next discrimination rule, which assesses the probability of higher risk
of CVC.
- the transient hypotension of the intraoperative CVC scheme is re-classified from low
risk to moderate risk;
- the compensated HF of the postoperative CVC scheme is re-classified from high risk to
moderate risk; the decompensate HF is determined as a high risk complication.
According to these corrections, the patients are distributed in CVC groups with different CR
level, as it is shown in Table 3.2 and Table 3.3. The control group consists of 97 patients. The
intraoperative CVC groups are with: low risk – 42; moderate risk – 206; high risk – 41. The
postoperative CVC groups are: 1 with low risk; 201 with moderate risk; 40 with high risk (21
of them with, and 19 without cardiac death).
Further on, the procedure for optimum discriminator synthesis was applied on the
already differentiated patient groups. Tables 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 present the weighting
discrimination coefficients of the corresponding groups, within the models that determine
the appearance of the risk of: postoperative CVC, based on data from the preoperative
period; postoperative CVC based on the pre- and intraoperative data period;
intraoperative CVC based on data from the preoperative period. The lack of a weighting
coefficient for a given index in some columns means that the step procedure of the
discriminant analysis has rejected this index as non-contributing to the correct patient
distribution in the corresponding groups.
Level of Number of
Type of complication
risk patients
Short transient hypertension
Low Supraventricular extrasystoles 42
Ventricular extrasystoles
Transient hypotension
Unprovoced prolonged hypotension ( > 1 hour)
Prolonged hypertension ( > 1 hour)
Supraventricular arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation,
Moderate supraventricular tachycardia) 206
Increased heart rate ( > 120 bpm)
Sinus bradycardia
ECG manifestations of myocardial ischemia
Frequent ventricular extrasystoles
Hypotension during sudden heart failure
Ventricular extrasystoles class IV
Ventricular tachycardia
High 41
Acute myocardial infarction
Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
Cardiac arrest
Table 3.2. Intraoperative cardiovascular complications
Risk Evaluation of Perioperative Acute Coronary Syndromes and
Other Cardiovascular Complications During Emergency High Risky Noncardiac Surgery 149
Level of Number of
Type of complication
risk patients
Hypotension
Ventricular extrasystoles
Hypertension
Angina attack
Cardiac arrest
Discrimination
CVC with CVC CVC CVC with
Cardiac
Indicators moderate with high with high moderate
death vs.
risk vs. risk vs. risk vs. risk vs.
control
control control cardiac CVC with
group
group group death high risk
Age 8.0
Arterial hypertension 10.5
Ischemic heart disease 2.5 15.0 14.0 6.5
Myocardial infarction 18.5 55.5
Arrhythmias 4.5
Heart failure 12.0 17.5 57.0 3.5
Chronic pulmonary disease 8.5
Diabetes mellitus 3.0 2.0 4.5
Lung breathing, preoperative 10.0
Lung auscultatory, preoperative
Systolic blood pressure, preoperative 0.5
Diastolic blood pressure,
preoperative
Central venous pressure,
19.5
preoperative
Heart rate, preoperative 19.5 6.5 6.0
Heart rhythm, preoperative
Heart auscultatory, preoperative 1.0 4.0 3.0
Hemoglobin, preoperative 3.0 18.0 11.0 7.0
Glucose, preoperative 3.5
Urea, preoperative
Creatinine, preoperative 13.5 43.5
Potassium, preoperative
Enzymes - SGOT, preoperative
Enzymes - SGPT, preoperative
X-ray lung, preoperative 27.5 3.5 16.0
Exercise ECG, preoperative
Myocardial ischemia - preoperative 40.5
Limit value for positive test: 40 30 60 35 30
Table 3.4. Quantitative models for postoperative CVC risk assessment according to
preoperative data
Risk Evaluation of Perioperative Acute Coronary Syndromes and
Other Cardiovascular Complications During Emergency High Risky Noncardiac Surgery 151
Discrimination
CVC with CVC with
CVC with Cardiac CVC with
moderate moderate
Indicators high risk death vs. high risk
risk vs. risk vs.
vs. control control vs. cardiac
control CVC with
group group death
group high risk
Age
Surgical conditions
Volume of surgery 1.0 8.0
Duration of anesthesia 2.0
Intraoperative surgery complications 0.5 5.0
Intraoperative CVC with low risk 4.5 5.0 3.5
Intraoperative CVC with moderate risk 81.0 69.0 41.0
Intraoperative CVC with high risk 8.5 21.5 43.0 8.5
Arterial hypertension, class 2.0
Ischemic heart disease 3.5 5.5
Myocardial infarction 7.0
Arrhythmias
Heart failure 15.5
Chronic pulmonary disease 1.5
Diabetes mellitus 7.5 3.5
Lung breathing, preoperative
Lung breathing, intraoperative
Lung auscultatory, preoperative 1.5 1.5
Lung auscultatory, intraoperative 6.5
Systolic blood pressure, preoperative 0.5
Diastolic blood pressure, preoperative 0.5
Systolic blood pressure, intraoperative
Diastolic blood pressure, preoperative
Central venous pressure , preoperative 3.5 11.5
Central venous pressure, intraoperative 17.0 15.0
Heart rate, preoperative 1.0
Heart rate, intraoperative 9.0
Heart rhythm, preoperative
Heart rhythm, intraoperative 5.0
Heart auscultatory, preoperative 2.5
Hemoglobin 4.5
Glucose
Urea
Creatinine 3.5 30.0
Potassium
Enzymes - SGOT
Enzymes - SGPT
X-ray lung 2.5 12.5
ECG LVH 0.5 0.5
Myocardial ischemia - preoperative
Limit value for positive test: 20 20 55 65 25
Table 3.5. Quantitative models for postoperative CVC risk assessment according to pre- and
intraoperative data
152 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Discrimination
CVC CVC
CVC CVC
CVC with with high
with with
with low moderat risk vs.
Indicators moderat high
risk vs. e risk vs. CVC
e risk vs. risk vs.
control CVC with
control control
group with low moderate
group group
risk risk
Age 24.0 18.5 7.0 6.0
Arterial hypertension 22.0 6.5 2.5 9.5
Ischemic heart disease 5.5 3.0
Myocardial infarction 11.0 8.0 20.5
Arrhythmias 42.0 19.5
Heart failure 12.0 13.0 11.0
Chronic pulmonary disease 9.0 4.5
Diabetes mellitus
Lung breathing, preoperative 8.0 19.0 17.0
Lung auscultatory, preoperative 8.5
Systolic blood pressure,
preoperative
Diastolic blood pressure, preoperative 7.5
Central venous pressure,
10.0
preoperative
Heart rate, preoperative 23.5 15.5
Heart rhythm, preoperative
Heart auscultatory, preoperative 8.5
Hemoglobin, preoperative 2.5 20.5 25.5
Glucose, preoperative 6.0
Urea, preoperative
Creatinine, preoperative
Potassium, preoperative
Enzymes - SGOT, preoperative
Enzymes - SGPT, preoperative
X-ray lung, preoperative 1.0
Exercise ECG, preoperative 2.0
Myocardial ischemia - preoperative 12.5 14.5 45.0
Limit value for positive test: 90 80 40 60 30
Table 3.6. Quantitative models for intraoperative CVC risk assessment according to
preoperative data
Tables 3.7 and 3.8 show the results of correct and incorrect classification of patients, on the
basis of the used training groups, ranged according to the CVC risk. The greater informative
value of the combination of pre- and intreoperative data for prognosis of postoperative CVC
becomes obvious, and the more distinct significance for prognosis of each higher-risk level
of the post- and intraoperative CVC.
Risk Evaluation of Perioperative Acute Coronary Syndromes and
Other Cardiovascular Complications During Emergency High Risky Noncardiac Surgery 153
Table 3.8. Predictive value of models for evaluation of cardiovascular complications (in
patient groups with adjacent levels of cardiac risk)
Risk Evaluation of Perioperative Acute Coronary Syndromes and
Other Cardiovascular Complications During Emergency High Risky Noncardiac Surgery 155
Generally, the proposed models for risk assessment of acute CVC appearances, and of
incidents with patients undergoing emergency noncardiac interventions, manifest not only
high significance, but also point out:
- the importance of the intraoperative CVC (especially that with moderate risk) for
prognosis of all risk level postoperative CVC, based on preoperative and intraoperative
data;
- the obtained discrimination between the groups with cardiac death and high risk
complications, which is impossible when directly using the ACC/AHA classification of
intra- and postoperative CVC;
- certain decrease of the discrimination importance of the preoperatively ECG detected
myocardial ischemia together with keeping its role in prognosticating the intraoperative
CVC with moderate and high risk, which are among the factors that determine the rate
and the severity of the postoperative CVC.
more risk factors. The last can be accomplished during each surgery, depending on the
change in the perioperative strategy – the intervention type and the anesthetic technique.
Patients without stress-induced moderate or heavy ischemia (orienting towards single- or
two-branch coronary disease) can continue with the planned intervention by inclusion of
statins and low dose beta-blockers. Individual approach is recommended for patients with
heavy stress-induced ischemia, after discussing the potential benefit of the advised surgery
in comparison with the bad prognosis. It is necessary to specify the effect of the
medicamentous therapy and/or coronary revascularization not only in the postoperative
plan, but also in a long-term plan.
5.3 Revascularization
When a life-threatening state, requiring surgical intervention, is combined with ACS, it is
advisable to give advantage to the surgery. However, a second stage necessities aggressive
medicamentous therapy and revascularization, according to the NSTEMI and STEMI-ACS
recommendations.
ACS without ST-elevations is interpreted as a high risk clinical state, requiring accurate
diagnosis, risk stratification and revascularization. That means that if no life-threatening
surgical state is present, advantage has to be given to the diagnosis and the appropriate
treatment of the unstable angina. The corner-stones of the treatment are the double
antiaggregating therapy, the beta-blocker and the revascularization.
The antiaggregation and the anticoagulations have to be carefully appreciated before
applying to patients with unstable AP and forthcoming surgery state, in order to avoid the
risk of subsequent enhanced bleeding. Most of the patients with unstable AP need
interventional revascularization and advantage must be given to metal stents, in order not
to delay the surgery more than three months.
The main goal of the prophylactic myocardial revascularization is the prevention of lethal
perioperative MI. As far as the revascularization may be only partially effective in treatment
of high risk stenosis, it cannot prevent the rupture of vulnerable plaque during the surgery
stress. This one is found at least in the half of the perioperative MI cases, and can explain the
lack of specificity in the stress-imaging methods for infarct-related coronary lesions
discovery. Patients with previous PCI can be with higher risk during or after noncardiac
surgery, especially in the cases of unplanned or emergency surgery that follow coronary
stent setting. The intervention duration and the specificity of the process (malignant tumor,
vascular aneurism, etc.) have to be adequately balanced against the risk of stent-provoked
thrombosis during the first year after the implantation of drug emitting stent. Careful
discussion is recommended in every individual case by a team, including a surgeon, an
anesthesiologist and a cardiologist.
Despite the specific strategies for risk reduction, the perioperative CR assessment gives an
opportunity for optimized control of all cardiovascular risk factors.
6. Index
-A-
ACC/AHA classification for CR assessment during noncardiac surgeries
acute cardiac inflammatory process
acute conductive disorders
Risk Evaluation of Perioperative Acute Coronary Syndromes and
Other Cardiovascular Complications During Emergency High Risky Noncardiac Surgery 157
-P-
perioperative cardiovascular complications
perioperative CVC
peripheral vascular diseases
preoperative CVC
-R-
real and relative myocardial ischemia
-S-
scales for CR evaluation
ST-depression in the preoperative ECG
sudden cardiac death
surgical factors in CR
-T-
Total Index for CR assessment, through ST-depression in the preoperative ECG (TCRISD)
-U-
unstable stenocardia
7. References
[1] Wong CB, Porter TR. Cardiac management of patients undergoing major noncardiac
surgery. Nebr Med J 1995; 80: 350-353.
[2] Eagle KA, Brundage BH, Chaitnam BR, et al. Guidelines for Perioperative
Cardiovascular Evaluation for noncardiac surgery. Report of ACC/AHA Task Force on
Practice Guidlines. Circulation 1996; 93: 1286–1317.
[3] Fleisher L, Pasternak L, Herbert R, Anderson G. Inpatient hospital admission and death
after outpatient surgery in elderly patients: imoprtance of patient and system
characteristics and location of care. Arch Surg 2004; 139:67-72.
[4] Milanova M, Matveev M. Cardiac risk evaluation in noncardiac surgical procedures.
Journal of Emergency Medicine 1998; vol. 6, 2:27-32.
[5] Milanova M, Matveev M. Heart risk assessment indicators in emergency noncardiac
surgery. I. Practicability in patients presenting periopertative cardiovascular accodents.
Journal of Emergency Medicine 1999; 7(2):45-52.
[6] Milanova M, Matveev M. Heart risk assessment indicators in emergency noncardiac
surgery. I. Practicability in patients free periopertative cardiovascular accodents.
Journal of Emergency Medicine 2001; 9(2):60-63.
[7] Milanova M, Matveev M. Index for myocardial ischemia assessment as a risk factor of
nonsurgical postoperative complications in emergency abdominal surgery. Journal of
Emergency Medicine 1999; vol. 7, 4:43-49.
[8] Goldman L, Caldera D. Risks of general anasthesia and elective operative in the
hypertensive patient. Anesthesiology 1979; 50: 285-293.
Risk Evaluation of Perioperative Acute Coronary Syndromes and
Other Cardiovascular Complications During Emergency High Risky Noncardiac Surgery 159
[9] Mangano DT, Browner WS, Hollenberg M et al. Association of perioperative myocardial
ischemia with cardiac morbidity and mortality in men undergoing noncardiac surgery.
New Engl J Med 1990; 323: 1781-1788.
[10] Foster ED, Davis KB, Carpenter JA et al. Risk of noncardiac operation in patients with
defined coronary disease: The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry
experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1986; 41: 42-50.
[11] Massie BM, Mangano DT. Risk stratification for noncardiac surgery. How (and why)?
Circulation 1993; 87: 1752 -1755.
[12] Gerson MC. Cardiac risk evaluation and management in noncardiac surgery. Clin
Chest Med 1993;14: 263-281.
[13] Kloner RA, Goldman L, Lee TH. Noncardiac surgery in the cardiac patient; Cardiovasc
Rev Rep1992; 13: 24-47.
[14] Jollis J. Outcomes in heart failure patients after major noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2004; 44:1446-53.
[15] Goldman L, D. Caldera, F. Southwick et al. Cardiac risk factors and complications in
noncardiac surgery, Medicine 1978; 57: 357-370.
[16] Ashton CM, Petersen NJ, Wray NP et al. The incidence of perioperative myocardial
infarction in men undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 504-510.
[17] Hollenberg M, Mangano DT, Browner WS. Predictors of postoperative myocardial
ischemia in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. The study of Perioperative
Ischemia Reserch Group. JAMA 1992; 268 (2): 205-209.
[18] Joyce WP, Ameli FM, Mc Ewan P et al. Failure of bicycle exercise electrocardiogram to
predict major post-operative cardiac complications in patients undergoing abdominal
aortic surgery. Ir Med J 1990; 83: 65-66.
[19] Leppo JA. Preoperative cardiac risk assessment for noncardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol
1995; 75: 42D-51D.
[20] Goldman L, Caldera D, Hussbaum S et al. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in
noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med 1977; 297: 845-850.
[21] Amar D, Roistacher N, Burt M, Reinsel RA, Ginsberg-RJ, Wilson-RS. Clinical and
echocardiographic correlates of symptomatic tachydysrhythmias after noncardiac
thoracic surgery. Chest 1995; 108: 349-354.
[22] Eagle KA. Surgical patients with heart disease: summary of the ACC/AHA guidelines.
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Am Fam Physician 1997;
56(3): 811-818.
[23] Detsky AL, Abrams HB, Mc Laughlin JR et al. Predicting cardiac complications in
patients undergoing noncardiac surery. J Gen Intern Md 1986; 1: 211-219.
[24] Lin M, Yang YF, Lin SL et al. Supraventricular tachiarrhythmias after noncardiac
surgery. Acta Cardiol Sin 1994; 10: 128-136.
[25] Goldman L, Braunwald E. General anaesthesia and noncardiac surgery in patients with
heart disease In: Braunwald E, ed. Heart disease, 4-th ed., Philadelphia: Sounders, 1992,
1708-1720.
[26] Prys Roberts C, Meloche R, Foex P. Studies of anesthesia in relation to hypertension. I.
Cardiovascular responses of treated and untreated patients. J Anaesthesiol 1971; 43:
122-
160 Acute Coronary Syndromes
[27] Larsen SF, Olesen KH, Jacobsen E et at. Prediction of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgery.
Eur Heart J 1987; 8: 179-87.
[28] Fleisher LA, Barash PG. Preoperative cardiac evaluation for noncardiac surgery: a
functional approach. Anesth Analg 1992, 74: 586-598.
[29] Khoja H, Gard D, Gupa M, et al. Evaluation of risk factors and outcome of Surgery in
Elderly patients. Journal of the Indian Acad. of Geriatrics 2008; 1:14-17.
[30] Carliner NH, Fisher ML, Plotnik GD et al. The preoperative electrocardiogram as an
indicator of risk in major noncardiac surgery. Can J Cardiol 1986; 2: 134-137.
[31] Cohen JR, Cooper B, Sardari F et al. Risk factors for myocardial infarction after distal
arterial reconstructive procedures. Am Surg 1992; 58: 478-483.
[32] Kroenke K, Lawrence VA, Theroux JF et al. Operative risk in patients with severe
obstructive pulmonary disease; Arch Intern Med 1992; 152/5: 967-971.
[33] Goldman L. Medical care of the surgical patient. JB Lippincott Co, Phyladelphia 1983:
41-47.
[34] Schouten O, Bax J, Poldermans D. Assessment of cardiac risk before non-cardiac general
surgery. Heart 2006; 92:1866-72.
[35] Bunker JP, Wennberg RD. Operation rates, mortality statistic and the quality of life. N
Engl J Med 1973; 289: 1249–1254.
[36] Eisenberg MJ, London MJ, Leung JM et al. Monitoring for myocardial ischemia during
noncardiac surgery. A technology assessment of transesophageal echocardiography
and 12-lead ECG. SPI Research Group. JAMA 1992; 268: 210-216.
[37] American College of Surgeons Committee on pre- and postoperative care: Manual of
preoperative and postoperative care. ed 3, WB Saunders Co, Phyladelphia 1983: 87-111.
[38] Goldman L. Cardiac risk in noncardiac surgery: An Update. Anesth. Analg 1995; 80: 810
– 820.
[39] Lawrence VA, Hilsenbeck SC, Mulrow CD, Dhanda R, Sapp J, Page CP. Incidence and
hospital stay for cardiac and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery. J Gen
Intern Med 1995; 10: 671-678.
[40] Hollenberg M, Mangano DT. Therapeutic approaches to postoperative ischemia. Am J
Cardiоl 1994; 73: 30B - 33B.
[41] Hopf HB, Tarnow J. Perioperative diagnosis of acute myocardial ischemia.
Anaesthesist 1992; 41: 509-519
[42] Kleinman B. Assessment and preparation of a cardiac patient scheduled for noncardiac
surgery: A cardiologist and anesthesiologist’s viewpoint. Probl Crit Care 1991; 5: 493–
512.
[43] Lette J, Colleti BW, Cerino M et al. Artificial intelligence versus logistic regression
statistical modelling to predict cardiac complications after noncardiac surgery. Clin
Cardiol 1994; 17: 609-614.
[44] Mangano DT. Dynamic predictors of perioperative risk. Study of Perioperative
Ischemia (SPI) Research Group. J Card Surg 1990; 5 (3 Suppl): 231-236.
[45] Mangano DT, Browner WS, Hollenberg M et al. Long-term cardiac prognosis following
noncardiac surgery. J Am Med Assoc 1992; 268: 233 – 239.
[46] Mangano DT. Perioperative cardiac morbidity. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41/5 II (R13 - R16).
Risk Evaluation of Perioperative Acute Coronary Syndromes and
Other Cardiovascular Complications During Emergency High Risky Noncardiac Surgery 161
[47] Eagle K, Coley C, Newell J et al. Combining clinical and thallium data optimizes
preoperative assessment of cardiac risk before major vascular surgery. Ann Intern Med
1989; 110: 859-866.
[48] Lee T, Marcantonio D, Mangione C et al. Derivation and Prospective Validation of a
Simple Index for Prediction of Cardiac Risk of Major Noncardiac Surgery. Circulation
1999; 100:1043-49.
[49] O’Kelly B, Browner WS, Massie B et al. Ventricular arrhythmias in patients undergoing
noncardiac surgery. J Am Med Assoc 1992; 268: 217-221.
[50] Mangano DT, Hollenberg M, Fegert G et al. Perioperative myocardial ischemia in
patients undergoing noncardiac surgery - I: Incidence and severity during the 4 day
perioperative period. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 843 - 850 .
[51] Greim CA, Roewer N, Schulte am Esch J. Assessment of changes in left ventricular wall
stress from the end-systolic pressure-area product. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 583-587.
[52] Charlson ME, MacKenzie CR, Gold JP et al. The preoperative and intraoperative
hemodynamic predictors of postoperative ischemia in patients undergoing noncardiac
surgery. Ann Surg 1989; 210: 637-643.
[53] Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, Chaitman BR, Ewy GA, Fleischmann KE et al.
ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for
noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of
Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee
to update the 1996 guidelines for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for
noncardiac surgery). Circulation 2002; 105: 1257-1267.
[54] Eagle KA, Rihal CS, Mickel MC, Holmes DR, Foster ED, Gersh BJ. Cardiac risk of
noncardiac surgery: influence of coronary disease and type of surgery in 3368
operations. CASS Investigators and University of Michigan Heart Care Program.
Coronary Artery Study. Circulation 1997; 96: 1882-1887.
[55] Goldman L. When the cardiac patient has noncardiac surgery. Prim Cardiol 1985; 11:
72-80.
[56] Abraham SA, Eagle KA. Preoperative cardiac risk assessment for noncardiac surgery. J
Nucl Cardiol 1994; 1: 389-398.
[57] Mangano DT, London MJ, Hollenberg M et al. Predicting cardiac morbidity in surgical
patients. Prim Cardiol 1992; 18: 27-36.
[58] Marsch SC, Schaefer HG, Skarvan K et al. Perioperative myocardial ischemia in patients
undergoing elective hip arthroplasty during lumbar regional anesthesia.
Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 518-527.
[59] Mangano DT. Characteristics of electrocardiographic ischemia in high-risk patients
undergoing surgery SPI Research Group. J Electrocardiol 1990; 23 Suppl : 20-27.
[60] Dodds TM, Stone JG, Coromilas J et al. Prophylactic nitroglycerin infusion during
noncardiac surgery does not reduce perioperative ischemia. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 705-
713.
[61] Bassand J, Hamm C, Ardissino D et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of
non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. European Heart Journal 2007;
28(13): 1598-660.
162 Acute Coronary Syndromes
[62] Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in
patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force on the
Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European
Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal 2008; 29(23): 2909-45.
[63] ESC Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac
Management in Non-Cardiac Surgery. European Heart Journal 2009; 30: 2769-812.
11
1. Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) represents a continuous spectrum of disease including
Unstable Angina (UA), acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and acute
ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In spite of major advances in prevention and
treatment, Acute Coronary Syndrome remains a leading cause of death as well as a major
cause of hospital admissions both within Europe and worldwide.[1-3]
Recent advances have allowed for early detection and disposition of patients with Acute
Coronary Syndrome. The first step in the management of patients with ACS is prompt
recognition. The diagnosis of ACS is largely based on the history, the electrocardiogram
(ECG) and changes in cardiac biomarkers. It is a universally acknowledged fact that history
remains the most essential tool in directing the need for further workup which includes
serial ECGs and measurement of cardiac biomarkers.
2. Diagnostic challenges
The ECG is an important diagnostic and risk stratification tool. Most patients who have
UA/NSTEMI have some ECG changes, although the ECG may be normal in 1% to 6% of
patients who have NSTEMI and in approximately 4% of patients who have UA.[4]ST
elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is diagnosed by the symptoms and the
characteristic ST elevation on the ECG. The other two variants of ACS, non-ST elevation
myocardial infarction and unstable angina are differentiated from each other by the
presence of positive cardiac biomarker in the former and the treatment varies
accordingly.[5-7]
Of the number of available markers and assays that detect myocardial necrosis, the cardiac
troponins T and I and the creatinine kinase–MB (CK-MB) isoform are the most commonly
used, with troponins gaining acceptance as the markers of choice in ACS. These have
achieved an important role in diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment pathways by virtue of
their high degree of sensitivity and specificity and their relative ease of use and
interpretation. However, troponins are detectable only 6 hours after myocardial injury and
are measurable for up to 2 weeks.
For a patient presenting with a suspected acute MI, the characteristics of the chest pain and
the ECG findings permit initial risk stratification. The gold standard in the care of a patient
164 Acute Coronary Syndromes
with cardiac chest pain is that an ECG and an abbreviated history and physical examination
be obtained within 10 minutes of patient arrival.[8]
The early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is however sometimes difficult due
to: [9]
1. Equivocal electrocardiogram (ECG) changes and other conditions with ECG changes
that mimic acute myocardial infarction. Atypical chest pains with many differentials
confuse to make a diagnosis.
2. Acute myocardial infarction patients without ST-segment elevation.
3. Delayed liberation and detection of cardiac markers of myocardial necrosis such as
troponin and creatine kinase (CK).
Cardiac troponin is frequently not detected until after 4-6 hours and in many cases, repeated
measurement is needed 8-12 hours after admission. The importance of early risk
stratification in the management of acute myocardial infarction is emphasized in the
American Heart Association task force guidelines.[10]Risk stratification is an important
objective in the evaluation of patients with ACS. The presence of positive biomarkers
indicates higher risk and worse prognosis.[11]
When initiating reperfusion therapy, door-to-needle time of less than or equal to 30 minutes
for initiation of fibrinolytic therapy and a door-to-balloon time of less than or equal to 90
minutes for percutaneous coronary perfusion is the standard of care.[12-14]Although, more
and more hospitals are meeting this benchmark, diagnosing and excluding ACS often poses
a diagnostic challenge to the clinicians.[15]A misdiagnosis may lead to considerable increase
in morbidity and mortality. An ideal marker which can predict the onset of the disease,
could aid in reducing the deaths due to ACS.
3. Cardiac biomarkers
Acute myocardial infarction refers to irreversible myocardial necrosis caused by an
imbalance between oxygen supply and demand. In 75% cases, plaque rupture or erosion
leading to thrombus formation are the causes of acute coronary syndromes. Early diagnosis
and subsequent reperfusion therapies within 4 to 6 hours of onset of symptoms can salvage
myocardium at risk. Therefore, optimal markers of myocardial necrosis need to be rapidly
detectable in blood.
Myocardial injury causes release into the extracellular space of intracellular constituents
including detectable levels of a variety of biologically active cytosolic and structural proteins
such as troponin, creatine kinase, myoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, etc.
Cardiac biomarkers have characteristic release and clearance kinetics. However, the time to
presentation and comorbidities that affect clearance may confound the interpretation of
biomarkers. Myoglobin is the earliest biochemical marker of myocardial cell damage, and it
is detectable in blood within 1 to 2 hours of myocyte damage. Blood levels of CK-MB may
be detectable in blood after 4 to 6 hours of myocardial ischemia. [16] Cardiac troponins are
elevated within 4 to 12 hours of symptom onset and remain elevated for 4 to 10 days. [17]
Based on these patterns of release and clearance, a diagnostic algorithm of serial biomarker
measurements has been developed. Serial sampling of multiple cardiac markers beginning
at the time of presentation is recommended currently. The sensitivity of serial
measurements of multiple markers nears 100%, whereas the sensitivity of a single
Early Evaluation of Cardiac Chest Pain – Beyond History and Electrocardiograph 165
measurement of any biomarker at the time of presentation is poor. The recommended time
between the first and second blood draw is 6 to 7 hours. [18] If cardiac marker levels are not
elevated but clinical suspicion remains high, a third set of markers should be drawn at 12 to
24 hours after presentation. [19] The markers currently used in this multimarker approach are
myoglobin, CKMB, and troponin.
3.1 Myoglobin
Myoglobin is a heme protein found in the cytoplasm of cardiac and skeletal muscle cells that
rises most rapidly after myocardial injury but is not cardiac-specific. [16] Myoglobin levels
are frequently elevated in patients who have renal failure, skeletal muscle injury, trauma,
and other diseases. Myoglobin is not used in most hospital laboratories.
of asymptomatic patients who had renal failure did not show TnI levels to be elevated in
this population. The previously noted false-positive TnI results in patients who have renal
failure were measured during acute disease states, including sepsis or pulmonary embolism,
which may independently cause elevated troponin levels. [27]
In symptomatic patients who have chest pain and renal dysfunction, elevated levels of
cardiac troponin predict patients at an increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
In a study of 7033 patients who had suspected acute coronary syndromes, the elevated
levels of TnT were predictive of death or myocardial infarction across the spectrum of
creatinine clearance. [28]
Despite the value of cardiac troponin as a very sensitive marker for myocardial damage,
elevated troponin levels do not reflect the mechanism of damage and should not be used
alone to diagnose myocardial infarction. Troponin levels may be elevated in patients who
have myocarditis, pericarditis, decompensated heart failure, and septic shock. The use of
troponin measurements as a screening tool in patients whose conditions have a low
suspicion for ACS lowers the sensitivity and positive predictive value to 47% and 19%,
respectively. A high sensitive troponin could be available in future to turn out an ideal
biomarker for ACS. [29]
injury in the early hours of the insult but may also be ideal for the diagnosis of reinfarctions.
H-FABP has been found to be superior to troponins due to its higher sensitivity.[33, 34]A
recent study showed h-FABP had a sensitivity of 75.76% and a specificity of 96.97%
compared with 58.59% and 98.94% for cTnT and 68.69% and 97.54% for CK-MB in the initial
6 hours after the onset of chest pain. [35]Recent data also suggests h-FABP may provide some
prognostic information which appears superior to that of troponins. [36].
FABP Quanta) is used for the quantitative measurement, especially in next one hour of the
initial testing to see if there is a rise of titre. This kit is more useful in emergency
department/CCU and ICU setting. ConformitéEuropéenne (CE) certification approving it
for sale in the European Union member countries.
5. References
[1] World Health Organization Department of Health Statistics and Informatics in the
Information, Evidence and Research Cluster (2004).The global burden of disease
2004 update. Geneva: WHO. ISBN 9241563710.
[2] Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2006 update:
a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke
Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation.2006; 113:85-151.
[3] World Health Organization. Estimated deaths per 100,000 population by cause and
Member State. http://www.oint/research/en (14 November 2008)
[4] Slater DK, Hlatky MA, Mark DB, et al. Outcome in suspected acute myocardial
infarction with normal or minimally abnormal admission electrocardiographic
findings. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:766–70.
[5] Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined-a
consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American
College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J
Am CollCardiol 2000;36 (3):959-69.
[6] Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation
myocardial infarction-executive summary. A report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
(Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of
patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am CollCardiol 2004;44 (3):671-
719.
[7] Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, Califf RM, Cheitlin MD, Hochman JS, et al.
ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable
angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-2002: summary
article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the
Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). Circulation 2002;106(14):1893-
900.
[8] Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the
management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of
the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force
on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the
Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 2004;
110:e82.
[9] Okamoto F, Sohmiya K, Ohkaru Y, Kawamura K, Asayama K, Kimura H, et al.
Human heart-type cytoplasmic fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) for the
diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Clinical evaluation of H-FABP in
168 Acute Coronary Syndromes
[36] Azzazy HME, Pelsers MMAL, Christenson RH. Unbound free fatty acids and heart
type binding protein: diagnostic assays and clinical applications. ClinChem
2006;52(1):19–29.
[37] Ecollan P, Collet JP, Boon G,Tanguy ML, Fievet ML, Haas R, Bertho N, Siami S, Hubert
JC, Coriat P, Montalescot G. Pre-hospital detection of acute myocardial infarction
with ultra-rapid human fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) immunoassay. Int J
Cardiol. 2007 Jul 31;119(3):349-54. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
12
1. Introduction
Many patients who present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are candidates for
coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Approximately 500,000 CABG operations are
performed each year in the United States, and many of these patients present with acute
coronary syndrome. In the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial
comparing CABG and percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease, 64%
of the patients presented with unstable angina (Rosamond, Flegal et al. 2008). According to
2007 ACC/AHA guidelines (Anderson, Adams et al. 2007), left main stenosis greater than
50% and three-vessel coronary artery disease represent a class I indication for coronary
artery bypass grafting in patients with unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial
infarction. In addition, patients with 2-vessel coronary artery disease and either diabetes or
left ventricular dysfunction may benefit from coronary artery bypass grafting (Class II
recommendation). Regardless of the modality of revascularization, patients with acute
coronary syndrome benefit from antagonists of platelet activity such as aspirin and
clopidogrel since these agents reduce the risk of major adverse events. However, antiplatelet
agents also increase the risk of bleeding in patients who will ultimately proceed to coronary
artery bypass graft surgery. Usually the benefits of early initiation of antiplatelet therapy
outweigh the risks. The purpose of this review is to summarize current antiplatelet therapy
in acute coronary syndrome, with particular emphasis on patients who will undergo
coronary artery bypass, and the appropriate operative strategies will be discussed. We will
also review the current recommendations for secondary prevention after coronary artery
bypass grafting.
2. Antiplatelet therapy
Platelet activation and aggregation play a critical role in the pathogenesis of coronary
thrombosis, and antiplatelet therapy has become a central tenet of the treatment strategy in
acute coronary syndrome. Platelet aggregation and activation can be inhibited
pharmacologically at several points in the cascade leading up to platelet aggregation, and
several of these antiplatelet agents are commonly used perioperatively in the setting of acute
172 Acute Coronary Syndromes
2009; Wallentin, Becker et al. 2009). However, prasugrel is associated with increased risk of
bleeding complications, especially related to CABG. In contrast, ticagrelor was not
associated with increased risk of bleeding related to CABG.
Several clinical trials have examined the outcomes of patients with ACS who were treated
with antiplatelet therapy before undergoing CABG. In the CURE trial, patients who
proceeded to CABG after receiving clopidogrel as opposed to placebo had a decreased
relative risk of the composite endpoint of death, MI or stroke prior to CABG (RR 0.56 95% CI
0.29-1.08, absolute risk reduction 1.8%). As long as clopidogrel was stopped 5 days prior to
CABG there was no increase in risk of life-threatening bleeding. The CLARITY-TIMI trial
and the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy) trials
demonstrated similar improved outcomes without increased risk of bleeding in patients
who underwent CABG after being treated with clopidogrel (Ferraris, Ferraris et al. 2005).
4. Operative strategies
Usually CABG can be delayed in ACS to allow ADP-receptor blockers to be metabolized
and excreted allowing platelet function to recover. If anticoagulation is critical, as is usually
174 Acute Coronary Syndromes
the case in ACS, short acting anticoagulants such as unfractionated heparin and Gp IIb/IIIa
inhibitors can be used up until shortly before going to the operative room. Patients with
ACS who have ongoing ischemia or are hemodynamically unstable and have received ADP-
receptor antagonists may benefit from bridge percutaneous coronary intervention or intra-
aortic balloon pump insertion. An algorithm for the management of patients with ACS that
undergo CABG is presented in Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Algorithm or the management of patients with ACS and indications for CABG.
Patients with ACS who are stable are observed while ADP receptor blockers are held for 5
days prior to surgery to eliminate the increased risk of bleeding and mortality (Ferraris,
Ferraris et al. 2005; Ebrahimi, Dyke et al. 2009). Aspirin is continued up to the time of
surgery. If there is particular concern about the grade of coronary stenosis or evidence of
ongoing ischemia, the patient may be continued on unfractionated heparin and/or Gp
IIb/IIIa inhibitors up until the time of surgery. The bleeding time or platelet function time
can be used to assess platelet function and the bleeding risk preoperatively. This may be
useful in assessing bleeding risk and planning for CABG. The dose of clopidogrel may be
proportional to the risk of bleeding after CABG. In patients who receive the 600 mg loading
dose of clopidogrel, CABG should be delayed 5-7 days for the platelet function to recover.
However, in patients who received the lower 300 mg loading dose and are maintained on 75
mg per day of clopidogrel, CABG may be safely performed after holding clopidogrel for 1-3
days. A logical strategy is to administer 300mg of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin at the
Coronary Bypass Grafting in Acute Coronary
Syndrome: Operative Approaches and Secondary Prevention 175
5. Secondary prevention
CABG for patients with ACS reduces angina, reduces the risk of myocardial infarction,
and improves long-term survival, particularly when the internal thoracic artery is grafted
to the left anterior descending artery (Anderson, Adams et al. 2007). However, secondary
prevention strategies are critical for the long-term benefit of revascularization to be
realized. Lifestyle modification such as diet modification, an exercise regimen, and
smoking cessation are necessary. Pharmacologic secondary prevention consisting of lipid-
lowering agents, antihypertensives (primarily with beta blockers), and antiplatelet
medications is also required to decrease the risk of progression of coronary artery disease
and graft occlusion. A strategy for antiplatelet therapy after CABG in patients with ACS is
presented in Figure 2. All patients should be continued on aspirin postoperatively to
reduce the risk of vein graft occlusion (ACC/AHA class I recommendation). This also
protects against the risk of future cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral
vascular ischemic events. In patients with ACS who have undergone coronary artery stent
placement, clopidogrel is required in addition to aspirin to reduce major cardiac events
(Muller, Buttner et al. 2000). In the CURE trial, patients with ACS treated with clopidogrel
in addition to aspirin had decreased cardiac events, stroke and hospitalizations at 1 year
regardless of whether they underwent PCI or CABG (Yusuf, Zhao et al. 2001). Therefore,
in our practice, patients with ACS who undergo on-pump CABG or OPCAB are treated
with 600mg aspirin suppository upon postoperative admission to the intensive care unit.
When they are extubated, clopidogrel 75mg daily is administered, in addition to aspirin
81mg daily. Dual antiplatelet therapy is continued in all patients with ACS for 9-12
months.
176 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Fig. 2. Strategy for antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of CAD after CABG.
All patients with a history of a cardiovascular event should be started on a beta blocker and
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (MHG –CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) for
secondary prevention of cardiovascular events unless otherwise contraindicated (1994;
Sacks, Pfeffer et al. 1996; 1998). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors should be
initiated in all patients with CAD and a left ventrticular ejection fraction less than 40%,
diabetes, hypertension, or chronic kidney disease (Smith, Allen et al. 2006). ACE inhibitors
may be considered in lower risk patients with well-controlled risk factors. If ACE inhibitors
are not tolerated or are contraindicated, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be
considered. Patients with heart failure may also benefit from ARBs. Medication compliance
is required for successful secondary prevention and must be ensured to reap the benefits of
revascularization.
6. Conclusions
Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel imparts a clear benefit in major adverse
cardiovascular events and mortality after acute coronary syndrome. Although these agents
may pose additional bleeding risk in the small percentage of patients with ACS that proceed
to CABG, the risk is far outweighed by the benefits, and much of the bleeding can be
diminished by delaying CABG when possible. Short acting anticoagulants and IABP
insertion may temporize while allowing platelet function to recover after discontinuing
Coronary Bypass Grafting in Acute Coronary
Syndrome: Operative Approaches and Secondary Prevention 177
clopidogrel. Following bleeding times postoperatively can clarify the need for platelet
transfusion in the event of bleeding. OPCAB may have offer some benefits by avoiding full
heparinization and avoiding the inflammatory response associated with cardiopulmonary
bypass. Secondary prevention with antiplatelet therapy, beta blockade, lipid lowering
therapy, and ACE inhibitors or ARBs is critical to the long term success of revascularization.
7. References
(1994). "Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart
disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)." Lancet 344(8934): 1383-
9.
(1996). "A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of
ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee." Lancet 348(9038): 1329-
39.
(1998). "Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with
coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. The Long-
Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group." N
Engl J Med 339(19): 1349-57.
Anderson, J. L., C. D. Adams, et al. (2007). "ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management
of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report
of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on
Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the
Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial
Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency
Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the
Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of
Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic
Emergency Medicine." J Am Coll Cardiol 50(7): e1-e157.
Bhatt, D. L., M. T. Roe, et al. (2004). "Utilization of early invasive management strategies for
high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes:
results from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative." Jama 292(17): 2096-
104.
Ebrahimi, R., C. Dyke, et al. (2009). "Outcomes following pre-operative clopidogrel
administration in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary
artery bypass surgery: the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention
Triage strategY) trial." J Am Coll Cardiol 53(21): 1965-72.
Ferraris, V. A., S. P. Ferraris, et al. (2005). "The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice
guideline series: aspirin and other antiplatelet agents during operative coronary
revascularization (executive summary)." Ann Thorac Surg 79(4): 1454-61.
Fox, K. A., F. A. Anderson, Jr., et al. (2007). "Intervention in acute coronary syndromes: do
patients undergo intervention on the basis of their risk characteristics? The Global
Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)." Heart 93(2): 177-82.
Genoni, M., R. Tavakoli, et al. (2003). "Clopidogrel before urgent coronary artery bypass
graft." J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126(1): 288-9.
Hongo, R. H., J. Ley, et al. (2002). "The effect of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin
when given before coronary artery bypass grafting." J Am Coll Cardiol 40(2): 231-7.
178 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Magee, M. J., J. H. Alexander, et al. (2008). "Coronary artery bypass graft failure after on-
pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass: findings from PREVENT IV." Ann
Thorac Surg 85(2): 494-9; discussion 499-500.
Moore, G. J., A. Pfister, et al. (2005). "Outcomes for off-pump coronary artery bypass
grafting in high-risk groups: a historical perspective." Heart Surg Forum 8(1): E19-22.
Muller, C., H. J. Buttner, et al. (2000). "A randomized comparison of clopidogrel and aspirin
versus ticlopidine and aspirin after the placement of coronary-artery stents."
Circulation 101(6): 590-3.
Puskas, J. D., P. D. Kilgo, et al. (2008). "Off-pump coronary bypass provides reduced
mortality and morbidity and equivalent 10-year survival." Ann Thorac Surg 86(4):
1139-46; discussion 1146.
Rastan, A. J., J. I. Eckenstein, et al. (2006). "Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery
for acute coronary syndrome: beating heart versus conventional cardioplegic
cardiac arrest strategies." Circulation 114(1 Suppl): I477-85.
Rosamond, W., K. Flegal, et al. (2008). "Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a
report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke
Statistics Subcommittee." Circulation 117(4): e25-146.
Sabatine, M. S., C. P. Cannon, et al. (2005). "Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and
fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation." N Engl J
Med 352(12): 1179-89.
Sacks, F. M., M. A. Pfeffer, et al. (1996). "The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after
myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and
Recurrent Events Trial investigators." N Engl J Med 335(14): 1001-9.
Serebruany, V. L., A. I. Malinin, et al. (2004). "Risk of bleeding complications with
antiplatelet agents: meta-analysis of 338,191 patients enrolled in 50 randomized
controlled trials." Am J Hematol 75(1): 40-7.
Seshadri, N., P. L. Whitlow, et al. (2002). "Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the
contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era." Circulation 106(18): 2346-50.
Smith, S. C., Jr., J. Allen, et al. (2006). "AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for
patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update:
endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute." Circulation 113(19):
2363-72.
Wallentin, L., R. C. Becker, et al. (2009). "Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute
coronary syndromes." N Engl J Med 361(11): 1045-57.
Wiviott, S. D., E. Braunwald, et al. (2007). "Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with
acute coronary syndromes." N Engl J Med 357(20): 2001-15.
Yende, S. and R. G. Wunderink (2001). "Effect of clopidogrel on bleeding after coronary
artery bypass surgery." Crit Care Med 29(12): 2271-5.
Yusuf, S., F. Zhao, et al. (2001). "Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with
acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation." N Engl J Med 345(7): 494-
502.
13
1. Introduction
Atherosclerosis is increasingly considered as a low grade inflammatory response of the
arterial wall to a variety of stimuli [Fuster&Lewis, 1994; Libby, 2001]. It is accepted that
the adhesion of circulating leukocytes and monocytes to endothelial cells (EC) and
subsequent transendothelial migration are an important step in the initiation and the
development of atherosclerotic lesions [Hillis&Flapan, 1998; Jang, 1994]. This process is
mediated by receptors expressed on the surface of vascular EC – cell adhesion molecules
(CAM) under the action of an enhanced oxidative stress, lipopolysaccharide and
proinflammatory cytokines. Vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) and intercellular
adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) are two members of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily
that play important but different roles in the adhesion of blood cells to the vascular
endothelium. The significance of these molecules in the course of atherogenesis is
confirmed by their immunohistochemically established elevated expression in the
atherosclerotic plaques [Cybulsky&Gimbronejr, 1991; O’Brien et al., 1993] and by
experimental models proving a delayed lesion development in case of their absence
[Cybulsky et al., 2001].
Circulating forms of adhesion molecules that have been described are probably generated
by cleavage to a site close to membrane insertion. The amount of ICAM-1 released has been
demonstrated to be directly correlated with the surface expression of ICAM-1 in EC in
culture and a correlation between plasma VCAM-1 and VCAM-1 mRNA has been reported
in human atherosclerotic aorta [Leuwenberg et al., 1992; Pigott et al., 1992].
Levels of soluble cell adhesion molecules have been postulated to be useful risk predictor of
cardiovascular events in healthy populations and various settings of ischemic heart disease
[de Lemos et al., 2000; Hwang et al., 1997; Mulvihill et al., 2000, 2001; O’Malley et al., 2001;
Ridker et al., 1998]. Nonetheless, the pathologic role of different soluble adhesion molecules
in various stages of coronary artery disease is not fully defined.
Two electrocardiographic markers - ventricular arrhythmias (VA), [Bigger et al., 1981;
Farrell et al., 1991; Kostis et al., 1987] and impaired cardiac autonomic function, as indicated
by depressed heart rate variability (HRV), [Bigger at al., 1992; Farrell et all, 1991;
180 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Hartikainen et al., 1996; Kleiger et al., 1987; Lanza et al., 1998, 2006; La Rovere et al., 1998]
have been shown to predict mortality among patients recovering from acute myocardial
infarction (MI). However there are only limited data about the prognostic value of
depressed HRV in the whole spectrum of patients with ACS and few attempts to quantify
the exact value of soluble adhesion molecules and HRV in the cumulative risk assessment of
patients with ACS [Kennon et al., 2008; Lanza et al., 2006].
Previous studies have shown that statin treatment improve the prognosis in patients with
acute coronary syndromes [Kinlay et al., 2003; Ridker at al., 2005]. The reduction of clinical
events secondary to lipid lowering has traditionally been attributed to reduction of
cholesterol deposition and facilitation of cholesterol efflux from coronary plaques. However,
several studies have recently suggested that the beneficial effects of statins in atherosclerotic
disease may not be limited to the lipid-lowering effects of these drugs. Possible explanations
for the observed reduction of morbidity and mortality with statin use include improvement
of endothelial function, plaque stabilisation, and inhibition of the inflammatory response
associated with atherosclerosis [Liao 2003; Ray&Cannon, 2005]. In the last years an
antiarrhythmic effect of statins has been suggested and reported as a possible contributing
mechanism.
The aim of this study was:
1. To assess heart rate variability and soluble adhesion molecules ICAM-1 (intercellular
adhesion molecule-1) and VCAM-1 (vascular cells adhesion molecule-1) in patients
with coronary artery disease and healthy control and to evaluate the usefulness of the
markers of impaired autonomic function and endothelial activation as predictors of
adverse prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
2. The impact of early initiation of low and moderate-dose rosuvastatin treatment on
autonomic function and concentrations of soluble adhesion molecules during the first
12 weeks post ACS without ST segment elevation.
2. Methods
2.1 Study protocol
The study consisted of two phases. In the first phase two groups of patients with coronary
artery disease (acute coronary syndromes without ST segment elevation and stable angina
pectoris) and one control group of subjects were included for comparisons of soluble
levels of adhesion molecules and heart rate variability. Between December 2001 and July
2002, a total number of 136 patients were involved in the study. Patients were divided
into three groups according to the clinical diagnosis. The first group consisted of 75
patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS (unstable angina and non ST elevation
myocardial infarction). Unstable angina (UA) patients (n=57) had ischemic chest pain at
rest within the preceding 48 hours that had developed in the absence of an extracardiac
precipitating cause with either ST segment depression of >0.1 mV or T wave inversion in
two or more contiguous leads on the presenting 12 lead ECG. Patients with non ST
elevation myocardial infarction (n=18) had similar diagnostic criteria along with elevation
of serum creatine kinase, without the evolution of pathological q waves. The second
group consisted of 36 patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) who had typical
exertional angina pectoris and positive stress test. Patients with angina at rest were
excluded from this group. The control group comprised of 25 healthy volunteers in the
same age of distribution, without angina symptoms and with normal physical
Markers of Endothelial Activation and Impaired Autonomic Function in Patients
with Acute Coronary Syndromes – Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Implication 181
examination and stress test. Subjects with acute or chronic inflammatory diseases,
malignancies, renal insufficiency, and severe liver disease, on immunosuppressive and
antibiotic treatment were excluded from the study. Also excluded were patients with
acute ST elevation myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, and history of myocardial
infarction, surgical intervention or major trauma within the preceding month.
A six months follow-up of patients with ACS was assessed by regular clinical examination
for every month. Primary outcome was defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial
infarction or recurrent hospital admission for severe unstable angina. After the 6-month
period of observation the study population was divided into two groups – with favorable
course of the disease and with occurrence of adverse coronary events.
In the second phase other 30 patients with ACS were allocated into two groups, and
received rosuvastatin 10 mg/day (n =16, mean age 57.25±2.2 years) or rosuvastatin 20
mg/day (n =14, mean age 57.64±3.1 years). The randomization was carried out by the
adaptive dynamic random allocation method irrespective of serum lipids levels. A follow-
up assessment of both HRV on ambulatory ECG monitoring and adhesion molecules levels
was performed during study period of 12 weeks. All patients were under treatment with the
same medications during the acute phase of the episode (aspirin, nitrates, beta blockers,
ACE inhibitors), according to the guidelines.
3. Results
3.1 Markers of endothelial activation and impaired autonomic function in patients with
acute coronary syndromes – Potential prognostic implication
3.1.1 Characteristics of the study population
Table 1 demonstrates clinical characteristics and biochemical data of all study groups. There
were no significant differences among study groups regarding age, gender, family history
and smoking status. The patients with coronary artery disease (acute coronary syndromes
and stable angina) had significantly higher rates of hypertension and dyslipidaemia
compared with healthy control group. The presence of coronary risk factors was equal
among groups with acute coronary syndromes and stable angina pectoris. Eight of the
patients in the control group (32%) were on antihypertensive medications. The
corresponding number of patients on antihypertensive medications in ACS group was 48
(64%) and 21 (61%) in stable angina pectoris group. All soluble ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and
hsCRP significantly discriminated between patients with ACS and SAP (p=0.014, 0.05 and
0.025 respectively) and control subjects (p<0.001, 0.05 and 0.048). Soluble ICAM-1 and
hsCRP were also elevated in patients with SAP compared with control group whereas no
difference in sVCAM-1 was found (p<0.001, 0.05 and 0.4). In opposite, all the parameters of
the frequency domain HRV tented to be lower in patients with ACS compared with stable
angina and control group. In healthy subjects VLF, LF and HF were elevated, but LF/HF
ratio was lower in comparison with stable angina patients (p=0.006).
Markers of Endothelial Activation and Impaired Autonomic Function in Patients
with Acute Coronary Syndromes – Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Implication 183
and with a significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction on the echocardiographic
examination performed between day 3 and day 7 of the hospitalization (54,6% versus 60,4%,
p=0,003). Concentrations of sVCAM-1 (1488,75 ng/ml versus 1071,45 ng/ml, p<0,001),
sICAM-1 (516,7 vs 433,3 ng/ml, p=0,010), hsCRP (32.6 vs 5.31 mg/l, p=0.001) and cTnT (0,72
vs 0,115 ng/ml, p<0,001) at presentation were significantly raised in patients who went on
to have ischemic events during the six months of follow-up. None of the parameters of HRV
was significantly associated with the occurrence of the composite endpoint. Although the
prognostic information of frequency domain HRV indices was low, we found out that 2
variables – reduced LF (27±1.7 vs 65.1±10 ms, p=0.05) and LF/HF ratio (0.5±0.2 vs 2.94±0.4,
p=0.004) were significantly predictive of death, but no for other endpoints (Fig 1)
No event Event
p
n (%) n (%)
Number 47 28
Males 26 (55.3) 15 (53.6) 1
Age, y 57.36 ±8.2 58.6 ±10.1 0.559
Hypertension 34 (72.3) 17 (60.7) 0.318
Smoking 23 (48.9) 15 (53.6) 0.812
Previous MI 12 (25.5) 7 (25) 1
Family history 20 (42.6) 16 (57.1) 0.242
BMI>25 25 (53.2) 18 (64.3) 0.470
Kilip>1 4 (8.5) 8 (28.6) 0.047
Cholesterol mmol/l 6.30 ±1.22 6.13 ±1.31 0.581
Triglycerides mmol/l 2.07 ±1.19 1.70 ±0.75 0.145
Ejection fraction % 60.4 ±7.65 54.6 ±8.45 0.003
Тroponin Т ng/ml 0.115 ±0.01 0.72 ±0.16 <0.001
hsCRP mg/l 5.31 ±1.66 32.59 ±9.45 0.001
sVCAM-1 ng/ml 1071.5 ±54.08 1488.8 ±90.3 <0.001
sICAM-1 ng/ml 433.3 ±20.01 516.7 ±23.8 0.010
VLF ms 114.5±13.4 89.2±11.6 0.16
LF ms 73.7±12.2 65.2±10.1 0.62
HF ms 56.6±16.4 32.5±6.5 0.143
LF/HF ms 1.98±0.3 2.98±0.4 0.07
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of patients with and without cardiovascular events during
follow-up
Markers of Endothelial Activation and Impaired Autonomic Function in Patients
with Acute Coronary Syndromes – Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Implication 185
Fig. 1. LF and LF/HF in patients according to the prognosis during the study period
Table 3 presents the associations between soluble adhesion molecules, high sensitivity C-
reactive protein and troponin T in patients with ACS. There is a moderately strong positive
correlation between the levels of sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1 (Spearman's r=0,205, p=0,028).
Levels of sICAM-1 showed a strong correlation with hsCRP. The correlation between
sVCAM-1 and hsCRP was r=0.144, p=0.11. In acute coronary syndromes levels of the
myocardial necrosis marker troponin T correlated highly significant with hsCRP (r=0.451,
p=0.001), but showed no interdependence with sVCAM-1 (r=0.106, p=0.383) and sICAM-1
(r=0.129, p=0.286).
p - 0,028 0,11
p 0,028 - <0,001
p 0,11 <0,001 -
VLF LF HF LF/HF
hsCRP r 0,128 -0,02 0,16 -0,19
p 0,35 0,87 0,24 0,16
sVCAM-1 r -0,10 -0,24 -0,12 -0,06
p 0,46 0,08 0,41 0,67
sICAM-1 r -0,08 0,014 0,03 0,009
p 0,55 0,92 0,82 0,95
cTnT r 0,125 0,017 0,15 -0,07
p 0,36 0,9 0,27 0,57
Table 4. Associations between HRV and soluble adhesion molecules, high sensitivity C-
reactive protein and troponin T
1,0 1,0
0,8 0,8
Sensitivity
0,6 0,6
Sensitivity
0,4 0,4
CRP VCAM-1
0,2 cTnT 0,2 ICAM-1
Reference Line Reference Line
0,0 0,0
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0
1 - Specificity 1 - Specificity
A total of 37 patients (49.3%) had a concentration of sVCAM-1>1153.4 ng/ml and the ischemic
event rate for these patients was 78.6%. The remaining 38 patients had sVCAM-1
concentrations <1153.4 ng/ml and the ischemic event rate in this group was 21.4% (Pearson
x2= 15,28, p<0,001). As Figure 3 A shows the difference was mainly driven by an increased
rate of non-fatal myocardial infarction and rehospitalsation for unstable angina in the group of
patients with high sVCAM-1 levels. Although the incidence rate of the ischemic complications
in the patients with sICAM-1>438 ng/ ml was 66,7% while in the patients with subthreshold
concentration of this parameter it was only 33,3%, a statistically reliable difference was lacking
(Pearson x2=2,71,p<0,140, Figure 3 B). The sensitivity of a concentration of sVCAM-1>1153.4
ng/ml for predicting future ischemic events was 79%, with a specificity of 68%. The negative
predictive value was 84%. The sensitivity of sICAM-1>438 ng/ml for predicting a future
ischemic events was 66%, with a specificity of 53% and negative predicting value of 72%.
40 Clinical course
non event
death
myocardial
30 infarction
Number of patients
unstable angina
20
32
10
15
13
7
4
1 1 2
0
<1153.4 >1153.4
VCAM-1 ng/ml
25
20
Number of patients
15
23
10 20
11
5
6 6
2
0
1 1
<438 >438
ICAM-1 ng/ml
b
Fig. 3. Cardiovascular events in patients according to concentration of sVCAM-1 (A) and
sICAM-1 (B)
188 Acute Coronary Syndromes
4.62
Model 1
4.63
2.55
Model 2
3.93
2.14
Model 3 3.8
2.22
1.61
Model 4 4.53
7.97
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Odds Ratio
CRP>4 mg/l cTnT>0.01 ng/ml Killip>1&EF<50% VCAM>1153.4 ng/ml
In order to assess the exact role of the increased soluble adhesion molecules levels we
analyzed the combined predictive value of these two molecules with that of the already
established prognostic indicators among ACS patients – troponin T and hs C-reactive
protein. Division of the patients into 4 groups based on their sCAM and cTnT levels
revealed that sVCAM-1 is an independent prognostic indicator of major adverse coronary
events during the six months follow-up. In the patients admitted to the ICU without any
detectable levels of the marker of cardiomyocyte necrosis (n=39) the incidence rate of the
ischemic events was 1,3% when combined with low levels of sVCAM-1 and 6,7% when
combined with sVCAM-1> 1153,4 ng/ml (Pearson χ2=6,03, p<0,024, Figure 5 A).
Simultaneously, the high sICAM-1 levels do not improve the prognostic value of troponin T
as there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of the complications
in the patients with a negative cTnT test in dependence on the low or high sICAM-1 levels
(the incidence of the complications was 2,9% and 5,7%, respectively) (Figure 5 B).
25
20
Events %
22.7
15
10 6.7
cTnT>0.01
5 6.7
1.3 cTnT<0.01
0
sVCAM<1153,4
20
15 20
Events %
10 10
cTnT>0.01
5
5.7
2.9 cTnT<0.01
0
sICAM<438
b
Fig. 5. Incidence of cardiovascular events according to soluble VCAM-1 and cTnT levels (A)
and soluble ICAM-1 and cTnT levels (B)
190 Acute Coronary Syndromes
30
25
Events %
20 25.3
15
10 6.7
hsCRP>4
5 4
1.3 hsCRP<4
0
sVCAM<1153,4
25
20
Events %
21.4
15
11.4
10
hsCRP>4
5
1.4 4.3 hsCRP<4
0
sICAM<438 sICAM>438
Fig. 6. Incidence of cardiovascular events according to soluble VCAM-1 and hsCRP levels
(A) and soluble ICAM-1 and hsCRP levels (B)
Markers of Endothelial Activation and Impaired Autonomic Function in Patients
with Acute Coronary Syndromes – Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Implication 191
3.2 Markers of endothelial activation and impaired autonomic function in patients with
acute coronary syndromes – Potential therapeutic implication
3.2.1 Characteristics of the study population
During the second phase of the study 30 patients with ACS were allocated into two groups,
and received rosuvastatin 10 mg/day (n =16, mean age 57.25±2.2 years) or rosuvastatin 20
mg/day (n =14, mean age 57.64±3.1 years) for 12 weeks. Baseline characteristics for each
group are presented in Table 6, showing no significant differences between the two
treatment groups. Furthermore, no significant differences in lipids, HRV and markers of
endothelial activation were observed at baseline.
Rosuvastatin Rosuvastatin
Variable 10 mg 20 mg p
n=16 n=14
3.2.2 Effects of rosuvastatin on lipid profile and markers of endothelial and autonomic
activation
The changes in lipid values from baseline to 12 weeks in the two treatment groups are
shown in Table 7.
Rosuvastatin 10 mg Rosuvastatin 20 mg
Baseline 3 months p Baseline 3 months p
Cholesterol
5,66±0,28 4,49±0,18 <0.001 6,07±0,32 4,24±0,16 <0.001
mmol/l
Tryglycerides
1,76±0,17 1,3±0,13 <0.001 1,93±0,25 1,37±0,18 <0.001
mmol/l
HDL-C mmol/l 0,99±0,03 1,05±0,04 <0.001 0,91±0,03 1,06±0,03 <0.001
LDL-C mmol/l 3,86±0,29 2,67±0,2 <0.001 4,27±0,28 2,27±0,11 <0.001
Table 7. Effects of rosuvastatin on lipid profile
Serum levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol in patients decreased after
3 months of treatment with rosuvastatin. The decrease in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol
was significantly larger in the more aggressively treated group (p<0.05 for all comparisons).
Rosuvastatin 10 mg Rosuvastatin 20 mg
Baseline 3 months p Baseline 3 months p
sVCAM-1
median ng/ml 1235 1120,2 962,4
1327,4
25- and 75- (831.3- (839,7- 0.43 (603,4- 0,01
(1039.5-1989.7)
percentile 1476.3) 1341,2) 1570,3)
sICAM-1
median ng/ml
476,8 385,5 439,4 324,7
25- and 75- 0,004 0.01
(424,3-516,8) (348,5-453,9) (362,1-607,3) (188,5-447,5)
percentile
VLF ms 97±18,7 99,5±16,5 0,8 90,7±16,7 113,3±20,5 0,35
LF ms 43,3±8,2 63,8±14,9 0,2 44,5±7,1 56,7±13,4 0,23
HF ms 19,8±5,8 37±11,6 0,23 20,9±6,7 42,2±7,2 0,009
LF/HF ms 3,34±0,5 2,87±0,5 0,31 3,58±0,5 1,73±0,2 0,003
Table 8. Effects of Rosuvastatin on Adhesion Molecules and HRV levels
After 3 months, patients in the 20 mg rosuvastatin group demonstrated a significant
decrease in serum levels of sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1 (Table 8, Figure 7 and 8). Also in the 10
mg-rosuvastin group, there was a significant decrease of sICAM-1 (Figure 9). However, no
changes in sVCAM-1 levels were observed in this group of patients (Table 8, Figure 10).
There were no significant differences in changes between the two treatment groups for
either soluble adhesion molecules levels, but for sICAM-1 we found out a trend towards
lower concentrations in the moderately treated group (p=0.07).
No correlations were found between changes in LDL-cholesterol over 12 weeks and changes
in s-ICAM-1 (r=0.198, p=0.29), sVCAM-1 (r=0.193, p=0.31) and HRV during the same period.
The Spearman’s correlation coefficients between hsCRP and sICAM-1 (r=0.059, p=0,7) and
sVCAM-1 (r=0.15, p=0,4) are low and not statistically significant.
Markers of Endothelial Activation and Impaired Autonomic Function in Patients
with Acute Coronary Syndromes – Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Implication 193
8000,00 vcam_1
vcam_statin
6000,00
VCAM ng/ml
4000,00
2000,00
0,00
1 2 6 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7
1 6 7 0 1 2 6 0 1 6 8 1 9 2 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 5 8 1 2 3 4
Case Number
Fig. 7. Intra-individual changes in levels of s-VCAM-1 in patients during the study.
1200,00 icam_1
icam_statin
1000,00
800,00
ICAM ng/ml
600,00
400,00
200,00
0,00
1 2 6 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7
1 6 7 0 1 2 6 0 1 6 8 1 9 2 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 5 8 1 2 3 4
Case Number
Rosuvastatin
10 mg 20 mg
1 000
800
Mean +- 2 SD
600
400
200
Rosuvastatin
10 mg 20 mg
6 000
4 000
Mean +- 2 SD
2 000
-2 000
Fig. 10. Mean changes ± 2 SD of sVCAM-1 in the two rosuvastatin treated groups
Markers of Endothelial Activation and Impaired Autonomic Function in Patients
with Acute Coronary Syndromes – Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Implication 195
vcam icam
LDL VLF LF HF LF/HF
1 1
Correlation
1,000 ,193 ,198 ,049 ,029 ,130 -,098
Coefficient
LDL
Sig. (2-tailed) . ,308 ,294 ,804 ,882 ,509 ,620
Correlation -
,193 1,000 ,384(*) -,158 -,506 ,207
Coefficient ,423(*)
vcam 1
Sig. (2-tailed) ,308 . ,036 ,405 ,020 ,004 ,273
Correlation
,198 ,384(*) 1,000 ,089 -,144 -,234 ,210
Coefficient
icam 1
Sig. (2-tailed) ,294 ,036 . ,654 ,465 ,231 ,284
Correlation
,049 -,158 ,089 1,000 ,694 ,431(*) ,125
Spearman's Coefficient
VLF
rho
Sig. (2-tailed) ,804 ,405 ,654 . ,000 ,017 ,511
Correlation -
,029 -,144 ,694 1,000 ,656 ,091
Coefficient ,423(*)
LF
Sig. (2-tailed) ,882 ,020 ,465 ,000 . ,000 ,634
Correlation
,130 -,506 -,234 ,431(*) ,656 1,000 -,649
Coefficient
HF
Sig. (2-tailed) ,509 ,004 ,231 ,017 ,000 . ,000
Correlation
-,098 ,207 ,210 ,125 ,091 -,649 1,000
Coefficient
LF/HF
Sig. (2-tailed) ,620 ,273 ,284 ,511 ,634 ,000 .
4. Discussion
The measurement of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 in prospective studies is based on the presence
of an inflammatory process in the artery wall which increases the expression of adhesion
molecules and on the hypothesis that the serum levels of these molecules reflect their
expression by the endothelial cells. In this study we had measured the two main
representatives of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily of CAM and found significantly
higher levels of both sVCAM-1 and sICAM-1 in patients with ACS as compared with those
with SAP and healthy controls. Our finding that soluble adhesion molecules and especially
sVCAM-1 are strongly and independently predictive for future CV events in patient with
ACS extends previous observations describing the predictive value of inflammatory
markers on future cardiac events. However, whereas the causative role of C-reactive protein
in promoting the inflammatory component in development of plaque rupture remains
controversial, our data implicate a direct mediator of an inflammatory vessel wall process.
Several arguments support the hypothesis that sCAM may be more useful than other
markers of inflammation in predicting clinical outcome:
First, all sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1 measured in our study are elevated in patients at risk for
future cardiovascular events. Second, sCAM levels did not correlate with cTnT, a specific
marker of cardiomyocyte necrosis and the most established prognostic marker in patients
with ACS. The risk related to the high sVCAM-1 concentrations is independent of the cTnT
that is evident from the increasing rate of complications in the groups with negative and
positive cTnT in dependence on sVCAM-1 levels. These data suggest that VCAM-1 release
actually precedes myocardial injury and that VCAM-1 elevation identifies patients with
unstable atherosclerotic plaque formation even before complete microvascular obstruction.
In contrast, we do not find any relationship between sICAM-1 and the risk of subsequent
events in the course of the follow-up and we do not read any enhanced incidence rate of
vascular events in the patients without laboratory evidence of a cardiomyocyte necrosis in
dependence on the levels of this parameter. Third, sVCAM-1 levels did not correlate with C-
reactive protein, a systemic marker of inflammation. Because hsCRP correlated with cTnT
levels elevated CRP serum levels most likely reflect both a robust vascular inflammatory
response and myocardial injury. The measurement of sVCAM-1 added to the predictive
value of hsCRP in determining the risk of future cardiovascular events. Even patients with
low hsCRP levels were found to be at significantly higher risk with elevated sVCAM-1
levels which suggest that endothelial activation and proteolytic cleavage of sCAM is a
primary event and is followed by release of other systemic mediators and acute phase
proteins such as C-reactive protein.
Prospective data of soluble adhesion molecules are sparse. The results of our study
correspond to the data published in the literature about the relationship between sCAM and
the risk of cardiovascular events and they find their explanation in some differences
between the two adhesion molecules studied. In the large prospective trials ARIC and PHS
of healthy individuals, sICAM-1, but not sVCAM-1 appears consistently related to incident
CAD [de Lemos et al., 2000; Hwang et al., 1997; Ridker et al., 1998]. ICAM-1 expression is
not only endothelial and ICAM-1 is constitutively expressed by a variety of cell types
including cells of the hematopoietic lineage and fibroblasts. sICAM-1 correlates with acute
phase reactants like CRP and provides similar predictive information to CRP in settings of
primary prevention [Blankenberg et al., 2003; Mulvihill et al., 2002; Ridker et al., 1998; 2000].
sICAM-1 therefore appears as a general marker of a proinflammatory status with little
Markers of Endothelial Activation and Impaired Autonomic Function in Patients
with Acute Coronary Syndromes – Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Implication 197
prognostic information in patients with ACS after controlling the data for troponin T and C-
reactive protein (Figure 5 and 6). By contrast, VCAM-1 is not expressed in baseline
condition, but is rapidly induced by pro-atherosclerotic conditions in animal models and
humans [Cybulsky&Gimbronejr, 1991; O’Brien et al., 1993]. It seems that sVCAM-1
represents an appropriate marker of plaque burden or activity of a potential clinical
importance as a prognostic indicator under the conditions of secondary prevention rather
than in healthy individuals without endothelial dysfunction [Blankenberg et al., 2003;
Mulvihill et al., 2002]. A similar hypothesis is supported by the data proving the
independent predictive value of sVCAM-1 in the patients with angiographically proven
coronary artery disease [Blankenberg et al., 2001], with diabetes mellitus [Jager et al., 2000]
and with ACS [Mulvihill et al., 2001, 2002] as well as its absence in healthy individuals [de
Lemos et al., 2000].
The relationship between depressed HRV and mortality is difficult to ascertain as the
exact physiological mechanisms responsible for the various HRV components are still
incompletely known [Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North
American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, 1996; Tsuji et al., 1996]. Decreased
values of HRV variables, including LF, may reflect reduced vagal tone or predominant
sympathetic influence to the heart. The presence of frequent or complex non-sustained VA
in the context of sympathovagal imbalance can increase the susceptibility to fatal VA, in
particular during myocardial ischaemia [Kent et al., 1973; Lanza et al., 1998, 2006;
Schwartz et al.,1988]. On the other hand, VA and depressed HRV are unlikely to be
associated with the triggers of acute MI, as they were not predictive of non-fatal MI in
hospital or at six-month follow up.
Recent experimental findings have suggested that the nervous autonomic system can
significantly modulate inflammatory reactions [Wang et al., 2003]. In particular, vagal
stimulation has been shown to decrease inflammatory reactions in animals by inhibiting
tissue macrophage activation, an effect mediated by stimulation of the alpha-7 subunit of
the macrophage nicotine receptor by the vagal neurotransmitter acetylcholine, whereas
adrenergic activity has been reported to favor sympathectomy and towards inflammatory
reactions. Conversely, several products of inflammation have been shown to have potential
influence on nervous autonomic activity by central and/or peripheral mechanisms [Lanza et
al.,2006; Tracey,2002]. The low and no significant correlations between markers of
endothelial activation and HRV in the present study emphasize that neural influence
unlikely explained the observed predictive value of soluble adhesion molecules in patients
with ACS.
ACS is a diffuse process involving the entire coronary vasculature [Buffon et al., 2002].
Although mechanical revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention may address
the culprit lesion, recurrent events may reflect disease progression or instability elsewhere
in the vascular tree. Stabilization of vulnerable plaques or modulation of the so-called
vulnerable patient is becoming recognized as an important target for systemic therapy
[Libby&Aikawa 2003; Naghavi et al., 2003a, 2003b]. The rapid pleiotropic effects of statins
on inflammation, endothelial function, and coagulation are likely to be particularly
beneficial in patients with ACS in whom these systems are deranged.
Inhibition of HMG CoA reductase by statins inhibits cholesterol synthesis and isoprenoid
production. This results in reduced prenylation of small G-proteins such as Rho and, in turn,
NF-κB activation. By inhibiting HMG CoA reductase, statins can prevent the biosynthesis of
198 Acute Coronary Syndromes
adhesion molecules. We observed that the treatment with rosuvastatin diminish both
markers of endothelial activation during 12 week follow-up. We found out a trend towards
lower concentrations of sICAM-1 in patients randomized to 20 mg Rosuvastatin, in addition
to the previously observed significant lowering of low-density lipoprotein and C-reactive
protein. There was no correlation between sCAMs and low-density lipoprotein and hsCRP
at month 3 and the effect of rosuvastatin on soluble CAMs did not appear to be explained by
changes in lipids or inflammatory markers.
However, standart statin therapy did not significantly alter sVCAM-1 levels at 3 months.
The present observations with sVCAM-1 are analogous to the observations with aspirin
and clopidogrel in which each drug decreases the risk of adverse clinical events in
subjects with high CRP levels but do not decrease CRP significantly [Chew et al., 2001;
Kennon et al., 2001; Ridker et al., 1997]. A potential mechanistic explanation for our
clinical observations is, that among subjects with increased endothelial activation, a more
potent statin regimen could bind to lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 on
inflammatory cells to a greater extent, thus interfering with downstream effects of
increased endothelial activation rather than decreasing endothelial activation itself. This
hypothesis raises the possibility that novel therapeutic strategies that target inhibition of
adhesion molecules may be of benefit in ACS, as has been demonstrated in animal
models and in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [Gill et al., 2005; Van Assche et
al., 2005].
An interesting finding was the observed beneficial effect of more intense statin regiment
on some parameters of autonomic function. During the study period we found out a
significant increase of high frequency component with represents the parasympathetic
contribution to the spectrum, whereas low frequency remained unchanged. As a result,
the LF/HF ratio, measure of autonomic balance was reduced significantly in patients
received 20 mg Rosuvastatin. The results of the correlation analysis clearly suggest that
some of the beneficial effects of more potent statin dose may be driven by the effect on
endothelial and autonomic function [Lanza et al., 2006; Patti et al., 2006]. Supports for this
hypothesis are the results of the meta-analysis of Patti et al, who found that high-dose
statin pretreatment before percutaneous coronary intervention leads to a significant
reduction in periprocedural myocardial infarction and 30-day adverse events. It is
noteworthy that the effect is most pronounced, but is not limited in patients with elevated
markers of inflammatory activity [Patti et al., 2011]. Our findings must be confirmed by
larger studies. It may contribute to the achievement of specific treatment goals for each
patient with proper drug selection and dose titration in high risk patients such as those
with elevated markers of endothelial activation and depressed HRV.
5. Conclusions
In patients with ACS, soluble adhesion molecules are independent predictors of subsequent
MACE and reduced HRV of medium-term mortality, suggesting that markers of endothelial
activation and impaired autonomic function should be taken into account in the risk
stratification of these patients.
Our findings support the hypothesis that statins decrease endothelial injury and activation
in patients with acute coronary syndromes. In addition we found that more aggressive
regiment with early initiation of 20 mg Rosuvastatin significantly decreases sICAM-1 levels
200 Acute Coronary Syndromes
and better preserve parasympathetically mediated variable of HRV. Future studies are
required to elucidate the optimal dose of statin treatment in patients with ACS and high
levels of markers of inflammatory and endothelial activation or impaired autonomic
function.
6. References
Ascer E, Bertolami MC, Venturinelli ML, et al (2004). Atorvastatin reduces proinflammatory
markers in hypercholesterolemic patients. Atherosclerosis, Vol. 177, pp. 161 -6.
Bigger JT, Weld FM, Rolnitzki LM (1981). Prevalence, characteristics and significance of
ventricular tachycardia (three or more complexes) detected with ambulatory
electrocardiographic recording in the late hospital phase of acute myocardial
infarction. Am J Cardiol, Vol. 48, pp.815–23.
Bigger JT, Fleiss JL, Steinman RC, et al (1992). Frequency-domain measures of heart period
variability and mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation, Vol. 85, pp. 164–
71.
Blankenberg S, Rupprecht HJ, Bickel C, Peetz D, Hafner G, Tiret L, et al. (2001) Circulating
cell adhesion molecules and death in patients with coronary artery disease.
Circulation , Vol. 104: pp. 1336–42.
Blankenberg S, Barbaux S, Tiret L (2003). Adhesion molecules and atherosclerosis.
Atherosclerosis, Vol. 170, pp. 191-203
Blanco-Colio LM, Martın-Ventura JL, de Teresa E, Farsang C, Gaw A, et all of the ACTFAST
investigators (2007). Elevated ICAM-1 and MCP-1 plasma levels in subjects at high
cardiovascular risk are diminished by atorvastatin treatment. Atorvastatin on
Inflammatory Markers study: A substudy of Achieve Cholesterol Targets Fast with
Atorvastatin Stratified Titration. Am Heart J, Vol. 153, pp. 881-8.
Buffon A, Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, D’Onofrio G, Crea F, Maseri A (2002). Widespread
coronary inflammation in unstable angina. N Engl J Med, Vol. 347, pp. 5–12.
Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Robbins MA, Mukherjee D, Roffi M, Schneider JP, Topol EJ, Ellis SG
(2001). Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin before percutaneous coronary
intervention on the risk associated with C-reactive protein. Am J Cardiol, Vol.88,
pp.672– 674.
Cybulsky MI&Gimbronejr MA (1991). Endothelial expression of a mononuclear leukocyte
adhesion molecule during atherogenesis. Science, Vol. 251, pp. 788–91.
Cybulsky MI, Iiyama K, Li H et al (2001). A major role for VCAM-1, but not ICAM-1, in
early atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest, Vol. 107, pp. 1255-1262
de Lemos JA, Hennekens CH, Ridker PM (2000). Plasma concentration of soluble vascular
cell adhesion molecule-1 and subsequent cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol, Vol.
36, pp. 423–6.
Farrell TG, Bashir Y, Cripps T, et al.(1991). Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in
postinfarction patients based on heart rate variability, ambulatory
electrocardiographic variables and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. J Am
Coll Cardiol, Vol. 18, pp. 687–97.
Fuster V.&Lewis A. (1994). Conner Memorial Lecture. Mechanisms leading to myocardial
infarction: insights from studies of vascular biology. Circulation, Vol. 90, pp. 2126-
2146.
Markers of Endothelial Activation and Impaired Autonomic Function in Patients
with Acute Coronary Syndromes – Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Implication 201
Gao L, Wang W, Li YL, Schultz HD, Liu D, Cornish KG, et al (2005). Simvastatin therapy
normalizes sympathetic neural control in experimental heart failure: Roles of
angiotensin II type 1 receptors and NAD(P)H oxidase. Circulation, Vol. 112, pp.1763
– 1770.
Gill V, Doig C, Knight D, Love E, Kubes P (2005). Targeting adhesion molecules as a
potential mechanism of action for intravenous immunoglobulin. Circulation, Vol.
112, pp. 2031–2039.
Gomes, ME; Tack, CT; Verheugt, FW at al (2010). Sympathoinhibition by Atorvastatin in
Hypertensive Patients. Circ J, Vol. 74, pp. 2622 – 2626
Hartikainen JEK, Malik M, Staunton A, et al (1996). Distinction between arrhythmic and
nonarrhythmic death after acute myocardial infarction based on heart rate
variability, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, ventricular arrhythmias and left
ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol, Vol. 28, pp. 296–304.
Hillis GS&Flapan AD (1998). Cell adhesion molecules in cardiovascular disease: a clinical
perspective. Heart , Vol. 79, pp. 429- 431.
Hirooka Y, Sagara Y, Kishi T, Sunagawa K (2010). Oxidative stress and central
cardiovascular regulation: Pathogenesis of hypertension and therapeutic aspects.
Circ J, Vol. 74, pp. 827 – 835.
Hwang SJ, Ballantyne CM, Sharrett AR, Smith LC, Davis CE, Gottojr AM, et al. (1997).
Circulating adhesion molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and E-selectin in carotid
atherosclerosis and incident coronary heart disease cases: the Atherosclerosis Risk
In Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation, Vol. 96, pp. 4219–25.
Jager A, van Hinsbergh VW, Kostense PJ, Emeis JJ, Nijpels G, Dekker JM, et al. (2000)
Increased levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 are associated with
risk of cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn study. Diabetes, Vol.
49, pp. 485–91.
Jang Y, Lincoff AM, Plow EF, Topol EJ (1994). Cell adhesion molecules in coronary artery
disease. J Am Coll Cardiol , Vol. 24, pp. 1591- 601.
Jilma B, Joukhadar C, Derhasching U, et al (2003). Levels of adhesion molecules do not
decrease after 3 months of statin therapy in moderate hypercholesterolemia. Clin
Sci (Lond), Vol. 104, pp. 189 - 93.
Kennon S, Price CP, Mills PG, Ranjadayalan K, Cooper J, Clarke H, Timmis AD (2001). The
effect of aspirin on C-reactive protein as a marker of risk in unstable angina. J Am
Coll Cardiol, Vol. 37, pp. 1266 –1270.
Kennon S, Price CP, Mills PG et al (2003). Cumulative risk assessment in unstable angina:
clinical, electrocardiographic, autonomic, and biochemical markers. Heart, Vol. 89,
pp36-41
Kent KM, Smith ER, Redwood DR, et al (1973). Electrical stability of acutely ischemic
myocardium: influences of heart rate and vagal stimulation. Circulation, Vol. 47, pp.
291–8.
Kinlay S, Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, et al. (2003). Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with
Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering Study Investigators. High-dose atorvastatin
enhances the decline in inflammatory markers in patients with acute coronary
syndromes in the MIRACL study. Circulation, Vol. 108, pp. 1560–1566.
202 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT et al., The Multicenter Postinfarction Research Group, (1987).
Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after
acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol, Vol. 59, pp. 256–62.
Kostis JB, Friedman LM, Goldstein S et al., for the BHATB Study Group, (1987). Prognostic
significance of ventricular ectopic activity in survivors of acute myocardial
infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, Vol. 10, pp. 231–42.
Lanza GA, Guido V, Galeazzi MM, et al (1998). Prognostic role of heart rate variability in
patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol, Vol. 82, pp. 1323–8.
Lanza GA, Cianflone D, Rebuzzi AG, et al. for the Stratificazione Prognostica dell’Angina
Instabile Study Investigators (2006). Prognostic value of ventricular arrhythmias and
heart rate variability in patients with unstable angina. Heart, Vol. 92, pp.1055-1063;
Lanza, GA, Sguegliaa GA, Cianflone D et al. for the SPAI (Stratificazione Prognostica
dell’Angina Instabile) Investigators (2006). Relation of Heart Rate Variability to
Serum Levels of C-Reactive Protein in Patients With Unstable Angina Pectoris. Am
J Cardiol, Vol. 97, pp. 1702–1706
La Rovere MT, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, et al (1998). Baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate
variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction.
ATRAMI (autonomic tone and reflexes after myocardial infarction) investigators.
Lancet, Vol. 351, pp.478–84.
Leuwenberg JF, Smeets EF, Neefjes JJ et al (1992). E-selectin and intercellular adhesion
molecule-1 are relased by activated human endothelial cells in vitro. Immunology,
Vol. 77, pp. 543-9.
Liao JK (2002). Beyond lipid lowering: the role of statins in vascular protection. Int J Cardiol,
Vol. 86, pp. 5–18.
Libby P. (2001). Current concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes.
Circulation, Vol. 104, pp. 365-372
Libby P&Aikawa M (2003). Mechanisms of plaque stabilization with statins. Am J Cardiol,
Vol. 91(suppl 4A), pp. 4B–8B.
Mulvihill N, Foley JB, Murphy R et al (2000). Evidence of prolonged inflammation in unstable
angina and non Q wave myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, Vol. 36, pp 1210-6.
Mulvihill N, Foley JB, Murphy R et al (2001). Risk stratification in unstable angina and non-
Q-wave myocardial infarction using soluble cell adhesion molecules. Heart, Vol. 85,
pp. 623-627
Mulvihill N, Foley JB, Crean P, Walsh M (2002). Prediction of cardiovascular risk using
soluble cell adhesion molecules. Eur Heart J, Vol. 23, pp. 1569-1574
Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis
C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, et al (2003). From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable
patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies, part I. Circulation,
Vol. 108, pp. 1664 –1672.
Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis
C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, et al (2003). From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable
patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies, part II. Circulation,
Vol. 108, pp. 1772–1778.
O’Brien KD, Allen MD, McDonald TO, Chait A, Harlan JM,Fishbein D, et al. (1993). Vascular
cell adhesion molecule-1 is expressed inhuman coronary atherosclerotic plaques.
Markers of Endothelial Activation and Impaired Autonomic Function in Patients
with Acute Coronary Syndromes – Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Implication 203
Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing
and Electrophysiology (1996). Heart rate variability: standards of measurement,
physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation, Vol. 93, pp.1043–65.
Tracey KJ (2002). The inflammatory reflex. Nature, Vol. 420, pp. 853– 859.
Tsuji H, Venditti FJ Jr, Manders ES, et al (1996). Determinants of heart rate variability. J Am
Coll Cardiol, Vol. 28, pp. 1539–46.
Van Assche G& Rutgeerts P. (2005). Physiological basis for novel drug therapies used to
treat the inflammatory bowel diseases. I. Immunology and therapeutic potential of
antiadhesion molecule therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Physiol
Gastrointest Liver Physiol, Vol. 288(suppl), pp. G169–G174.
Wang H, Yu M, Ochani M, et al (2003). Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha7 subunit is an
essential regulator of inflammation. Nature, Vol. 421, pp. 384 –388.
Weitz-Schmidt G, Welzenbach K, Brinkmann V, et al (2001). Statins selectively inhibit
leukocyte function antigen-1 by binding to a novel regulatory integrin site. Nat
Med, Vol. 7, pp. 687–92.
Wiklund O, Mattson-Hulten L, Hurt-Camejo E, et al (2002). Effects of simvastatin and
atorvastatin on inflammatory markers in plasma. J Intern Med, Vol. 251, pp. 338 - 47.
Yoshida M, Sawada T, Ishii H, et al. (2001). HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor modulates
monocyte-endothelial cell interaction under physiological flow conditions in vitro:
involvement of Rho GTPase-dependent mechanism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,
Vol. 21, pp. 1165–1171.
14
1. Introduction
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), i.e. acute myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina,
is a life threatening disease, and its treatment after onset has greatly improved; however, we
are not satisfied with the long-term outcome of the patients with ACS. Furthermore, we
cannot adequately prevent the onset of ACS, although we know many risk factors of ACS,
e.g. diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, and smoking.
As plaque disruption and thrombosis is known as the major cause of ACS, many
investigations to identify vulnerable plaques that are prone to disrupt have been performed
but failed to identify high-risk lesions of future ACS event. Major reason for this failure may
be that disruption of plaques does not always cause ACS and probably very few percentages
of disrupted plaques may actually cause ACS. In order to know adequately about the
mechanisms for the onset of ACS and to prevent it effectively, we have to clarify those
missing factors that are essential for the disrupted plaques to cause ACS.
In this chapter, we would like to elucidate and discuss on the known and unknown
mechanisms for the onset of ACS from the angioscopic point of view.
As >90% of ACS patients have disrupted yellow plaque in their culprit lesions, both
ruptured and eroded plaques, which are detected in about 70% and 30% of cases,
respectively, by pathologic studies, should be detected as yellow plaques5. We have recently
revealed4 that both ruptured and non-ruptured yellow plaques detected by angioscopy have
similar atherosclerotic characteristics including thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) when
examined by VH-IVUS (Figure 1).
4. Silent plaque disruption and missing factors for the onset of acute
coronary syndrome
Disrupted yellow plaques are sometimes found in the asymptomatic patients or in the non-
culprit segments of ACS patients, which are called silent plaque disruptions10, 11. Factors
required for the disrupted plaques to cause symptomatic ACS are unknown, which is an
important but unsolved issue for clarifying the mechanism of ACS onset. However,
thrombogenic potential of blood, thrombogenic potential of necrotic core that would be
exposed to blood by plaque rupture, underlying stenosis or stenosis caused by the
protrusion of necrotic core at the site of plaque rupture, and/or vasoconstriction may play a
role for the onset of ACS after the disruption of vulnerable plaques12. Investigations to
clarify the contributions of these or other factors have not been reported adequately.
Although the thrombogenicity of blood, i.e. vulnerable blood, has been regarded one of
important factors, reports on this issue are limited. We have recently reported13 that
originally defined parameter of blood thrombogenicity (blood vulnerability index) is
significantly and extremely higher in the patients with acute MI than in the patients with
stable coronary heart disease.
Acute Coronary Syndrome from Angioscopic Viewpoint 207
B
Most of ACS culprit lesions have disrupted yellow plaque, which is classified into ruptured or non-
ruptured yellow plaque by angioscopy. Non-rupture would include small rupture and erosion of
pathologic classifications. Both of ruptured and non-ruptured yellow plaques have similar
atherosclerotic characteristics by VH-IVUS. (From reference #4)
Fig. 1. Culprit lesions of ACS
208 Acute Coronary Syndromes
Yellow plaques are classified into 3 grades according to these standard colors: grade 1, slight yellow; grade 2,
yellow; and grade 3, intensive yellow. Grade 0 indicates white color. Yellow plaques of the higher grade are
regarded more vulnerable as they have higher frequency of plaque disruption. (From reference #6)
Fig. 2. Classification of yellow plaques according to their color
The yellow plaque at the culprit lesion is disrupted having thrombus on it. There are multiple yellow
plaques in the non-culprit segments both in culprit and non-culprit vessels. The formation of yellow
plaques is regarded pan-coronary process. (From reference #9)
Fig. 3. Coronary arteries in acute MI patients
Acute Coronary Syndrome from Angioscopic Viewpoint 209
Various conditions of neointima coverage are observed at 1-year follow-up after DES implantation. A:
White and good (grade 2) neointima coverage is observed without thrombus formation. B: Thin (grade 1)
neointima coverage is observed without thrombus formation; and the vessel wall under stent is white. C:
Thin (grade 1) neointima coverage is observed without thrombus formation; however, the vessel wall
under stent is yellow. D: Neointima coverage grade is partly 1 and partly 2. Both of vessel wall under
stent and neointima over stent are yellow. Yellow atherosclerotic neointima is often observed after Cypher
stent implantation but never after BMS implantation. E: Uncovered stent strut is observed on the yellow
disrupted plaque. Thrombus is detected on the yellow plaque and on the stent strut. (From reference #17)
Fig. 4. Angioscopic appearance of DES implanted lesions at follow-up
Acute Coronary Syndrome from Angioscopic Viewpoint 211
Cypher stent was implanted on a white vessel wall (A). However, at 1-year follow-up (B), neointima that
covered the stent was yellow, suggesting the early formation of atherosclerosis in the neointima. Yellow
arrow indicates where the stent was implanted. Red arrow indicates the stent strut. (From reference #17)
Fig. 5. Rapid progression of atherosclerosis in the neointima after DES implantation
Process of positive feedback and cyclic flow variation might play an important role for the
onset of ACS: i.e. a plaque disruption causes thrombus formation that increases
thrombogenicity of blood and more thrombus would be formed; if the occlusive thrombus is
formed, it may cause cyclic flow variation depending on the severity of stenosis and the
amount of thrombus formed, which may further increase the thrombogenicity of blood; and
the thrombus may finally occlude the artery. In this process, the amount of thrombus must
be influenced by the thrombogenicity of both blood and exposed necrotic core; and the
severity of stenosis would be determined by the underlying stenosis, the stenosis increased
by the protrusion of necrotic core on plaque rupturing, and the stenosis caused by
vasoconstriction that may be induced by thrombus formation.
It is well known that silent plaque disruption is frequently detected in the patients with
ACS23, suggesting that plaque disruption and/or thrombogenesis is generally promoted in
ACS patients (Figure 6). Blood thrombogenicity would be increased in ACS patients as
mentioned above. Another idea is that coronary vessels generally have inflammation in ACS
patients, i.e. coronary flu syndrome, which might possibly be the initiation mechanism of
ACS.
These mechanisms should be examined more intensively by clinical and basic
investigations; and blocking some of these steps may be able to prevent the onset of ACS.
In a patient with acute MI (culprit lesion at red arrow), a silent plaque disruption (at yellow arrow) was
detected. The healing process of silently disrupted yellow plaque was observed as the regression of
yellow color intensity and the disappearance of thrombus by 6 months. (From reference #23)
Fig. 6. Silent plaque disruption and its healing in the non-culprit segments in acute MI
patients
Acute Coronary Syndrome from Angioscopic Viewpoint 213
8. References
[1] Ueda Y, Asakura M, Yamaguchi O, Hirayama A, Hori M, Kodama K. The healing
process of infarct-related plaques. Insights from 18 months of serial angioscopic
follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1916-1922.
[2] Ueda Y, Asakura M, Hirayama A, Komamura K, Hori M, Kodama K. Intracoronary
morphology of culprit lesions after reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction:
serial angioscopic observations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:606-610.
[3] Mizote I, Ueda Y, Ohtani T, Shimizu M, Takeda Y, Oka T, Tsujimoto M, Hirayama A,
Hori M, Kodama K.. Distal protection improved reperfusion and reduced left
ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction who had
angioscopically defined ruptured plaque. Circulation. 2005;112:1001-1007.
[4] Sanidas EA, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Kashiyama T, Guo J, Pu J, Shang Y, Claessen B,
Dangas GD, Leon MB, Moses JW, Stone GW, Ueda Y. Angioscopic and virtual
histology intravascular ultrasound characteristics of culprit lesion morphology
underlying coronary artery thrombosis. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:1285-1290.
[5] Ueda Y, Ogasawara N, Matsuo K, Hirotani S, Kashiwase K, Hirata A, Nishio M, Nemoto
T, Wada M, Masumura Y, Kashiyama T, Konishi S, Nakanishi H, Kobayashi Y,
Akazawa Y, Kodama K. Acute coronary syndrome: insight from angioscopy. Circ
J. 2010;74:411-417.
[6] Ueda Y, Ohtani T, Shimizu M, Hirayama A, Kodama K. Assessment of plaque
vulnerability by angioscopic classification of plaque color. Am Heart J.
2004;148:333-335.
[7] Kubo T, Imanishi T, Takarada S, Kuroi A, Ueno S, Yamano T, Tanimoto T, Matsuo Y,
Masho T, Kitabata H, Tanaka A, Nakamura N, Mizukoshi M, Tomobuchi Y,
Akasaka T. Implication of plaque color classification for assessing plaque
vulnerability: a coronary angioscopy and optical coherence tomography
investigation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1:74-80.
[8] Ohtani T, Ueda Y, Mizote I, Oyabu J, Okada K, Hirayama A, Kodama K. Number of
yellow plaques detected in a coronary artery is associated with future risk of acute
coronary syndrome: detection of vulnerable patients by angioscopy. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 2006;47:2194-2200.
[9] Asakura M, Ueda Y, Yamaguchi O, Adachi T, Hirayama A, Hori M, Kodama K.
Extensive development of vulnerable plaques as a pan-coronary process in patients
with myocardial infarction: an angioscopic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1284-
1288.
[10] Ueda Y, Hirayama A, Kodama K. Plaque characterization and atherosclerosis
evaluation by coronary angioscopy. Herz. 2003;28:501-504.
[11] Masumura Y, Ueda Y, Matsuo K, Akazawa Y, Nishio M, Hirata A, Kashiwase K,
Nemoto T, Kashiyama T, Wada M, Muller JE, Kodama K. Frequency and location
of yellow and disrupted coronary plaques in patients as detected by angioscopy.
Circ J. 2011;75:603-612.
[12] Muller JE, Tofler GH, Stone PH. Circadian variation and triggers of onset of acute
cardiovascular disease. Circulation 1989;79;733-743.
[13] Matsuo K, Ueda Y, Nishio M, Hirata A, Asai M, Nemoto T, Kashiwase K, Kodama K.
Thrombogenic potential of whole blood is higher in patients with acute coronary
214 Acute Coronary Syndromes
syndrome than in patients with stable coronary diseases. Thromb Res. 2011, in
press.
[14] Ueda Y, Nanto S, Komamura K, Kodama K. Neointimal coverage of stents in human
coronary arteries observed by angioscopy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:341-346.
[15] Asakura M, Ueda Y, Nanto S, Hirayama A, Adachi T, Kitakaze M, Hori M, Kodama K.
Remodeling of in-stent neointima, which became thinner and transparent over 3
years: serial angiographic and angioscopic follow-up. Circulation. 1998;97:2003-206.
[16] Oyabu J, Ueda Y, Ogasawara N, Okada K, Hirayama A, Kodama K. Angioscopic
evaluation of neointima coverage: sirolimus drug-eluting stent versus bare metal
stent. Am Heart J 2006;152:1168-1174.
[17] Higo T, Ueda Y, Oyabu J, Okada K, Nishio M, Hirata A, Kashiwase K, Ogasawara N,
Hirotani S, Kodama K. Atherosclerotic and thrombogenic neointima formed over
sirolimus drug-eluting stent: an angioscopic study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.
2009;2:616-624.
[18] Nakazawa G, Otsuka F, Nakano M, Vorpahl M, Yazdani SK, Ladich E, Kolodgie FD,
Finn AV, Virmani R. The pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary
implants bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1314-1322.
[19] Higo T, Ueda Y, Matsuo K, Nishio M, Hirata A, Asai M, Nemoto T, Murakami A,
Kashiwase K, Kodama K. Risk of in-stent thrombus formation at one year after
drug-eluting stent implantation. Thromb Res. 2011, in press.
[20] Hirayama A, Saito S, Ueda Y, Takayama T, Honye J, Komatsu S, Yamaguchi O, Li Y,
Yajima J, Nanto S, Takazawa K, Kodama K. Qualitative and quantitative changes in
coronary plaque associated with atorvastatin therapy. Circ J. 2009;73:718-725.
[21] Kodama K, Komatsu S, Ueda Y, Takayama T, Yajima J, Nanto S, Matsuoka H, Saito S,
Hirayama A. Stabilization and regression of coronary plaques treated with
pitavastatin proven by angioscopy and intravascular ultrasound--the TOGETHAR
trial. Circ J. 2010;74:1922-1928.
[22] Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, Mehran R,
McPherson J, Farhat N, Marso SP, Parise H, Templin B, White R, Zhang Z, Serruys
PW; PROSPECT Investigators. A prospective natural-history study of coronary
atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226-35.
[23] Okada K, Ueda Y, Matsuo K, Nishio M, Hirata A, Kashiwase K, Asai M, Nemoto T,
Kodama K. Frequency and Healing of Nonculprit Coronary Artery Plaque
Disruptions in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. Am J Cardiol.
2011;107:1426-1429.