Cisco Networking Academy Connecting Networks Companion Guide: Hierarchical Network Design
Cisco Networking Academy Connecting Networks Companion Guide: Hierarchical Network Design
Search
🔎
Home Shop By Cert Formats Cisco Networking Academy Deals & Promotions Video Training Explore Community
Home > Articles > Cisco Network Technology > General Networking > Cisco Networking Academy Connecting Networks Companion Guide: Hierarchical
Network Design
When discussing network design, it is useful to categorize networks based on the number
of devices serviced:
Network designs vary depending on the size and requirements of the organizations. For
example, the networking infrastructure needs of a small organization with fewer devices
will be less complex than the infrastructure of a large organization with a significant
number of devices and connections.
There are many variables to consider when designing a network. For instance, consider
the example in Figure 1-1. The sample high-level topology diagram is for a large
enterprise network that consists of a main campus site connecting small, medium, and
large sites.
Network design is an expanding area and requires a great deal of knowledge and
experience. The intent of this section is to introduce commonly accepted network design
concepts.
NOTE
Hubs and switches were added as more devices needed to be connected. A flat network
design provided little opportunity to control broadcasts or to filter undesirable traffic. As
more devices and applications were added to a flat network, response times degraded,
making the network unusable.
A better network design approach was needed. For this reason, organizations now use a
hierarchical network design as shown in Figure 1-3.
A hierarchical network design involves dividing the network into discrete layers. Each
layer, or tier, in the hierarchy provides specific functions that define its role within the
overall network. This helps the network designer and architect to optimize and select the
right network hardware, software, and features to perform specific roles for that network
layer. Hierarchical models apply to both LAN and WAN design.
The benefit of dividing a flat network into smaller, more manageable blocks is that local
traffic remains local. Only traffic that is destined for other networks is moved to a higher
layer. For example, in Figure 1-3 the flat network has now been divided into three
separate broadcast domains.
A typical enterprise hierarchical LAN campus network design includes the following three
layers:
Another sample three-layer hierarchical network design is displayed in Figure 1-4. Notice
that each building is using the same hierarchical network model that includes the access,
distribution, and core layers.
NOTE
There are no absolute rules for the way a campus network is physically built. While
it is true that many campus networks are constructed using three physical tiers of
switches, this is not a strict requirement. In a smaller campus, the network might
have two tiers of switches in which the core and distribution elements are combined
in one physical switch. This is referred to as a collapsed core design.
In a LAN environment, the access layer highlighted grants end devices access to the
network. In the WAN environment, it may provide teleworkers or remote sites access to
the corporate network across WAN connections.
As shown in Figure 1-5, the access layer for a small business network generally
incorporates Layer 2 switches and access points providing connectivity between
workstations and servers.
Layer 2 switching
High availability
Port security
QoS classification and marking and trust boundaries
Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) inspection
Virtual access control lists (VACLs)
Spanning tree
Power over Ethernet (PoE) and auxiliary VLANs for VoIP
The distribution layer aggregates the data received from the access layer switches
before it is transmitted to the core layer for routing to its final destination. In Figure 1-6,
the distribution layer is the boundary between the Layer 2 domains and the Layer 3
routed network.
The distribution layer device is the focal point in the wiring closets. Either a router or a
multilayer switch is used to segment workgroups and isolate network problems in a
campus environment.
A distribution layer switch may provide upstream services for many access layer
switches.
The core layer is also referred to as the network backbone. The core layer consists of
high-speed network devices such as the Cisco Catalyst 6500 or 6800. These are
designed to switch packets as fast as possible and interconnect multiple campus
components, such as distribution modules, service modules, the data center, and the
WAN edge.
As shown in Figure 1-7, the core layer is critical for interconnectivity between distribution
layer devices (for example, interconnecting the distribution block to the WAN and Internet
edge).
The core should be highly available and redundant. The core aggregates the traffic from
all the distribution layer devices, so it must be capable of forwarding large amounts of
data quickly.
The three-tier hierarchical design maximizes performance, network availability, and the
ability to scale the network design.
However, many small enterprise networks do not grow significantly larger over time.
Therefore, a two-tier hierarchical design where the core and distribution layers are
collapsed into one layer is often more practical. A “collapsed core” is when the
distribution layer and core layer functions are implemented by a single device. The
primary motivation for the collapsed core design is reducing network cost, while
maintaining most of the benefits of the three-tier hierarchical model.
The example in Figure 1-8 has collapsed the distribution layer and core layer functionality
into multilayer switch devices.
The hierarchical network model provides a modular framework that allows flexibility in
network design and facilitates ease of implementation and troubleshooting.
About Affiliates Cisco Systems, Inc. Contact Us FAQ Jobs Legal Notice Privacy Notice Site Help Site Map Write for Us