Carles1 PDF
Carles1 PDF
Carles1 PDF
www.perfumersapprentice.com
This series of articles was published in the 1968 yearbook issue of the
publication “Soap, Perfumery & Cosmetics” and is available at many
libraries across the country. To find a library near you, search on
www.worldcat.org.
The apprentice perfumer at the beginning of his career is like a ship without a rudder. If he is left
to his own devices or badly lead, his discoveries will lack organization and will lead him inevitably
to wasteful and ineffectual use of his creative energy.
In my early days on this rugged pathway, I found myself in the presence of tutors who seemed to
have disregarded the necessity for basic rules and whose enthusiasm in our fate was of the
mildest. Watching how they proceeded with their own work was not particularly enticing: they
appeared to believe in a happy-go-lucky way of life, desultorily dipped smelling strips into the
available samples of odorous materials, and thus their formulations progressed, small addition by
small addition, and not according to some preestablished plan. Thus, in the past, most of the
great perfume creations, or rather, of the commercially successful perfumes, were produced
almost by chance, sometimes to the unfeigned surprise of their authors! Although such happy
occurrences are always possible, a firm belief in them should not be the guiding rule.
Since the trial and error method held no appeal for me, I attempted from the very outset of my
career - 50 years ago - actually to understand the whys and wherefores of the fascinating world I
entered for better or worse. This is why I feel I may now offer to share whatever experience I've
acquired since with my younger colleagues, many of whom still work undirected and create in
haphazard fashion, in the expectation of a potential miracle.
In perfumery, however, miracles are few and far between. From the very outset, a perfumer
should be able to tell whether a creation stands a chance of becoming a sales success. The
technique I eventually worked out has made perfume creation surprisingly easy. Thanks to it, I
am never a loss for creating new perfumes.
Although some sort of apology should be in order for the seemingly inordinate conceit of what I
have just set forth, all my laboratory colleagues and all those who have come to us for tuition can
vouch that I've stated nothing but the truth. Also, I firmly believe that the simplicity and the ready
applicability of my method will become fully apparent once I disclose my views on organized
creative perfumery.
There is no mystery in the way I work. Over the past 35 years, more than 100 students, both
French and foreign, have taken courses in perfumery in the company's laboratory at Grasse and
have been taught according to the simple method which I had originally devised for myself.
I am here trying to record the result of 50 years of sometimes disappointing, but often most
rewarding experiences, in the hope that my young colleagues will find therein new possibilities for
future creations and will see their enthusiasm increase tenfold when their efforts are crowned with
success: since without enthusiasm there can be no perfumer.
PERFUMERY AN ART
Perfumery is an art, not a science, as many seem to believe. A scientific background is not
necessary for the perfumer; scientific knowledge may even sometimes prove an obstacle to the
freedom required in perfume creation. The creative perfumer should use odorous materials in the
same way that a painter uses colors and give them opportunity for maximum development and
effect, although it is understood that potential reactions such as discoloration within the ultimate
formulation and also the stability of the perfume should be given due consideration. This is about
the only use the perfumer will be able to make of his scientific training, if any.
The perfumer’s only tool is his nose. I was first called "Mr. Nose" in the USA about 20 years ago.
But any one of us is a potential Mr. Nose since, in perfumery, there just is no privileged "nose".
Anyone may acquire a highly developed sense of smell, as this is merely a matter of practice. A
good nose, that is, an excellent olfactory memory, is not sufficient for producing a good perfumer.
By the term "a nose" is meant a perfumer who is able to distinguish a pure product from
unadulterated product, who can tell lavender 50% from lavender 40%. I myself, in spite of my
long experience, am but a beginner in comparison to the old "noses" I met at Grasse at the
beginning of my career, and who were able to detect olfactorily the geographical area where a
given oil of neroli or of lavender came from.
Olfactory training is of prime importance and should never be neglected or interrupted. Our own
perfumers make it a strict rule to test daily their knowledge of perfume materials and this is why a
half-hour is set apart for this exercise, which we all perform in a truly competitive spirit.
Let it be emphasized again that no "nose" can be said to be better than another, and that it is
merely a question of olfactory memory for which daily training is not only
necessary , but indispensable.
OLFACTORY STUDIES
Thus, the training of a beginner who knows nothing about perfumery should begin with the
olfactory study of all odorous materials, both natural and synthetic. In order to facilitate such a
study, the beginner will first be given to smell contrasting odors, and later materials belonging to a
certain odor "family". Elsewhere are given two tables relating to olfactory studies, according to
such requirements. Learning to smell his smelling strips, to identify and to distinguish from one
another all odorous materials, the beginner will soon notice that the odor of the products changes
with time, that the rate of evaporation is not the same for all products.
Therefore, the next step will be for him to establish a classification of odorous materials according
to their volatility.
While such a classification could be establish scientifically, the apprentice perfumer will soon
attain unexpected proficiency by forgetting any technical information he may have, and by
establishing "his" classification for himself, as I had to 40 years ago.
On the smelling strips will first be inscribed the date and time at which the drop of the odorous
material was deposited thereon, and later the date and time at which the product on the strip will
begin to lose its main characteristic, it's typical odor. When proceding thus, no consideration
should be taken of the ultimate off-odors, such as terpenic notes or the like. This technique will
soon make it apparent for the student that while some products are very volatile and lacking in
tenacity, others are of intermediate volatility and tenacity, and others still are of low volatility and
high tenacity.
Such data will then readily be set forth in tabular form, all available all odorous materials being
listed under three headings, as shown in the table below.
The student will then have to be taught how to use this table.
As set forth above, I have termed:
very volatile products lacking tenacity
Top notes
Anyone even remotely familiar with perfume materials is aware that all products of low volatility
and high tenacity such as Vetiver, oak moss, patchouli, the Methyl Ionones and the like, give off a
rather unpleasant smell when freshly deposited on the smelling strips but, on the other hand, the
scent given off during the subsequent stages of evaporation is excellent. This is the reason for
the use of the modifiers of intermediate volatility and tenacity which will serve to change the
unpleasant top note of the base products.
Finally, the very volatile top notes, lacking tenacity, will serve to impart to the perfume
composition a very pleasant odor on opening the bottle.
For illustrative purposes, let us take as an example the creation of the chypre note.
We shall select a second product belonging to the series of base notes, whichever was the most
appropriate for blending with absolute oak moss. In the present case, we shall use, for example,
absolute Cistus colorless or a similar product such as ambergris 162B, and we shall prepare a
series of "Accords" containing both constituents in the following ratios:
Absolute 9 8 7 6 5
Oakmoss
Ambergris 1 2 3 4 5
162B
We shall not test combinations beyond the five: five ratio, since the following ratios of materials:
Absolute 4 3 2 1
Oakmoss
Ambergris 6 7 8 9
162B
would no longer produce an accord based on oakmoss, but an accord based on ambergris.
We shall then choose between the five "Accords" based on oakmoss and, for example, shall
decide on the following:
6 absolute oakmoss
4 ambergris 162B
Since any chypre note should also have a musk like character, we shall at a certain amount of
musk ketone or of musk ambrette to the above "Accord". Thus, the base of the desired chypre
note will be as follows:
6 Absolute Oakmoss
4 ambergris 162B
1 Musk Ketone
When smelling this blend on the smelling strip, we shall notice that its immediate effect is rather
unpleasant, although this will fairly rapidly disappear and be replaced by a pleasant, long-lasting
note essentially characteristic of the personality of the ultimate perfume.
We shall choose a floral note, a rose note, for example rose absolute. This rose note will subdue
the immediate effect of our "Accord " between bases and make it more pleasant. It will play its
part as a modifier of base notes, and this is the reason why we have termed the products of
intermediate volatility and tenacity: "modifiers" (of base notes). To the rose note, we shall add a
trace of absolute civet, so as to impart a slightly animal shading to the chypre note.
At this stage, the formula is as follows:
modifiers - 3 Absolute Rose
1 Absolute civet, 10% sol.
Bases
6 Absolute Oakmoss
4 Ambergris 162B
1 Musk ketone
Our formula, however, is not yet complete. We must add to it a top note, which will produce the
immediate effect when smells on opening the bottle. This note is fairly important, since the
potential buyer is easily influenced by it - with or without reason - as in no case can the top note
be the characteristic note of the perfume.
This study is far easier than the study of the "Accord" between bases, since the series of very
volatile products lacking tenacity contains many odorous products, most of which possess very
pleasant notes. The study of the "Accord" between top notes can be carried out as set forth
above for base notes, but with much more freedom and fantasy. Combinations, in this case, are
countless, and may be left entirely to the perfumer’s initiative.
As with base notes, we may study several "Accords" between two or three notes, or even four.
Let us, for example, after testing various combinations, decide upon the use of sweet orange and
Bergamot in the following amounts:
4 Sweet Orange
1 Bergamot
Thus, the extremely simple formulation of our chypre note may be written down as follows:
Modifers (20%)
3 Absolute Rose
1 Absolute Civet, 10% sol.
Bases (55%)
6 Absolute Oakmoss
4 Ambergris 162B
1 Musk Ketone
It is understood that the above is not complete formula, but that it is nearly given for the purpose
of illustrating the method set forth in this paper.
IV. Proportions. Percentages of the three groups of products: bases, modifiers and top notes.
This percentage is extremely important: it is, for the major part, responsible for the tenacity of the
perfume. A perfume containing 20% of bases, 30% of modifiers and 50% of top notes will lack
tenacity, since the percentage of bases would be relatively too low as compared with that of the
more volatile modifiers and top notes. Therefore, the proportions are selected so as to obtain a
balanced evolution during evaporation.
We shall now examine how this chypre note formula could be completed, or modified. Let us first
consider the base notes. We have already realized the "Accord":
absolute oakmoss
ambergris 162 B
musk ketone
We might, for example, add to it Vetiver, which will result in the following "Accord":
absolute oak Moss
ambergris 162 B
Vetiver
musk ketone
…………… A B C D
Absolute Oakmoss 4 6 3 3
Ambergris 162B 4 3 6 3
Vetiver Bourbon 4 3 3 6
Musk Ketone 1 1 1 1
Thus, when studying the above "Accord", the main characteristic will be imparted by oakmoss in
experiment B, by ambergris in experiment C and by Vetiver in experiment D.
The student perfumer will also be able to choose between the following "Accords":
(a) absolute oakmoss .
ambergris 162B
patchouli
according to his preferences with respect to the main odorous characteristic of the base of the
chypre note he wishes to create. Obviously, the use "Accords" could be increased to contain 4, 5
or 6 notes.
It is therefore apparent that this method offers endless possibilities for creating new notes and
new perfumes, the perfumer being entirely free to use any odorous material in these "Accords",
provided however, that such materials are selected from the series of base notes; such complete
freedom in the choice of the starting odorous materials may also be given to the beginner.
Whatever the type of formulation, once we feel the "Accord" between bases is complete and fully
satisfactory, we shall have to reconsider our first selection of modifiers. In our first tentative
chypre note formula, we might, in place of the rose note, use an Orange note, a Jasmin note, or
any other floral note such as Lily of the valley or carnation. Again, top notes should also be
similarly adjusted.
For the purpose of illustrating the procedure used for such adjustments, a series of modifications
is given below.
absolute Rose
absolute civet
First modification
sweet Orange
Bergamot
Second modification
Bergamot
Laurel nobilis
Angelica seeds
juniper berries
Muguet
Third modification
Bergamot
sweet Orange
absolute Rose
absolute oakmoss
Amber liquid
Methyl Ionone
Vetiver
patchouli
absolute Jasmin
musk ketone
Fourth modification
Bergamot
Lemon
linalyl acetate
Jasmin 1103
geranium African
orange flower 1103
aldehydes C9, C10, C11
Thus, modifications of the original formulation may be carried out endlessly; although the
resultant blend is always within the scope of chypre notes, an entirely different perfume is
obtained each time. However, this result can be achieved only provided the original formula is
written down as suggested above, in the following order:
Top Notes
Modifiers
Base Notes
The specific example given above of the successive steps a perfume formulation shows how any
particular type of perfume may be endlessly varied. But the method applies just as well when the
perfumer wishes to obtain novel perfumes from a basic formula established to contain "Accords"
of which he is especially fond.
AIDS to metamorphosis
In this respect, I shall describe an experiment with which our former students are well familiar and
which might be called "a brief lesson in perfumery". I first write down, with black pencil, a very
simple formula containing, let us say, about eight products and which results in a very acceptable
perfume. To this formula, I then add new products, the names of which I write down with a red
pencil: thus, a second perfume is produced , while the proportions and the constituents of the first
formulation remain unchanged. Pursuing this ensuing experiment, I added new series of products
to the second formula just obtained, writing down the names with a blue pencil; it is understood
that these new products contain top notes, modifiers and base notes. Again, without affecting
any change in the products making up the first two formulations, a third perfume is produced ,
which is also entirely different from the others. ... And the experiment might go on, endlessly, by
mere addition of products.
At this point, I feel the subject of accessory products should be mentioned. What are "accessory
products."? As far as I'm concerned, products in this series are those which, owing to their typical
odor or to their high scenting power, cannot be used in large amounts in an "Accord" between
bases or between modifiers, but whose presence in a formulation in more or less traces results in
a complete change in the character of the latter and imparts to it a unique cachet. Examples of
such products are aldehydes C12 (MNA) and C14, styrallyl acetate, isobutyl quinoline,
galbanum, cascarilla and the like. However, although I have just recommended to use such
products with moderation, this is not to be taken as a standing rule. Aldehyde C12 (MNA), for
example, proves to be an exception and it should be known that some products such as
geranium, give most successful blends with as much as 50% of it. The advantages which may be
derived from the use of accessory products are therefore readily apparent, and it would be
pointless to discuss them at greater length in the present paper. But such considerations bring
me quite naturally to mention an error, which is quite common in young perfumers.
Our eager would be perfumers seem to feel that they are under the obligation to produce "well
rounded" perfumes, in other words, that they should subdue or hide any predominating odorous
material. I believe this is actually the worst mistake the perfumer could be guilty of, since this
desire for attaining maximum equilibrium in a perfume results in a subdued, characterless
finished composition.
One should never believe, before actually experimenting, that a formulation contains an excess of
a given product. Such "excess" may quite possibly be due to the lack of some other product.
Dominantly effective notes in perfumes should be neither feared nor deliberately avoided. They
are a perfumer's own secret, and such "faults" have quite often been responsible for tremendous
commercial success. As a matter of fact, when the perfumer feels the amount of a basic product
should be increased in a formulation, he should increase this original amount twofold, threefold,
and even tenfold. This will afford him the almost unhoped-for opportunity of hitting on an
outstanding "Accord". This amount can always be reduced at a later stage, but the perfumer will
know at once what results can be expected from the use of an excess of absolute oakmoss, of
Vetiver, of Methyl Ionone and the like in the ultimate formulation, an excess which, sometimes will
"pay".
At present, to meet with success perfumes should actually "explode" all over, so to speak.
Modern perfumery requires contrasts, sharply characterized olfactory values. The perfumer
should be totally unprejudiced, should entirely disregard his own tastes. Woe to him if he hates
Vetiver, if he cannot stand aldehydes. He should be aware that there are no incompatibilities in
perfumery, that apparently clashing materials will blend successfully on addition of another
product playing the part of a binding agent and making their odorous compatible. The creative
perfumer should, above all else, consider the clientele's tastes. The commercial success of the
new perfume, of the novel "Accord", is essentially dependent on his original ideas, on his brain
waves.
I have often been asked about the question: "what is the latest fashion in perfumery?" There is
no fashion in perfumery. Only actual sales success dictate the fashion. A good perfumer is a
perfumer who knows how to create a "bestseller".
Great perfumers, like great concert pianists, should make it a strict rule to practice scales, in other
words, to study possible "Accords" between cases, since only therefrom can they derive the
necessary technique conducive to virtuosity. While this as an overwhelmingly all embracing task,
an effort should be made however, to reduce it to less gigantic and more readily accessible
proportions. It is not necessary, when studying "Accords" based on chypre notes, for example, to
consider the combinations of absolute oakmoss with all existing odorous products. The perfumer
will first select the odorous raw materials he will see fit to use in his creation of a chypre note, and
is only from such materials that he will study the satisfactory "Accords" between bases.
But, although I have stated at the beginning of this paper that, in perfumery, miracles are few and
far between, I must say that this, actually, is where the true miracle emerges.
The very selection a perfumer makes of the raw materials to be used as ingredients in a new
formulation is the best of all possible standards for appraising the originality, the initiative and the
genius of the creative perfumer, on which the success of the new perfume is entirely dependent.
And while it is possible to devise a method which will enable the apprentice perfumer to
understand and to acquire some sort of the technique, in perfumery as in many other fields many
will be called but few chosen, since the essential qualities which lead to success cannot be
taught, any more than can be taught enthusiasm, the joy of living and of creating, and the love for
one's calling. These are innate qualities without which there is no great perfumer.
There is not much more I can say about the method I devised for my work, and it is up to my
readers to take over where we left off. On the basis of the method I set forth in the previous
paper, they may study "Accords" with products other than absolute oakmoss, that is Accords with
Vetiver, patchouli, Sandalwood, Methyl Ionone, etc.
Unless they find the work deadly dull from the start , they will enjoy many months of systematic
research from which they will draw many useful lessons. My own experiments with absolute
oakmoss have already passed the 1000 mark, and at least as many, if not more, remain to be
carried out, since such investigations are endless.
(End of Part 1)