Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer
PROF.PRAKASH PATIL
Assistant Prof. M. E. Mechanical Engineering, Rajarshi Shahu College of Engg. Pune, Maharashtra,India
DR.KAMLESH SORATE
Associate Prof. M. E. Mechanical Engineering, Rajarshi Shahu College of Engg. Pune, Maharashtra,India
193 | P a g e
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering and Technology [IJRPET]
ISSN: 2454-7875
VOLUME 3, ISSUE 6, Jun.-2017
Parameter Dimension in mm
e 10
W 200
H 350
P 80
Area of triangle,
A= 0.5×W×H
=34883.72mm2
Perimeter of triangle,
P=3×W
=600mm
Hydraulic diameter
Graph 3: Nusselt no. Vs Reynolds no. for 450 rib angle.
Dh= (4×P) ÷A
=232.56mm =0.23m
Nusselt no Vs Reynold no
(60 degree)
12000
10000
8000
6000
Nu Vs Re
Graph 2: Nusselt no. Vs friction factor for plani duct. 4000
2000
Results graphs and discussion for plain duct 0
1. From graph 1 it is found that as increasing Nusselt 2400 2600 2800 3000
number Reynolds no. increases.
2. From graph 2 it is found that as increasing Nusselt Graph 5: Nusselt no. Vs Reynolds no. for 600 rib angle.
number friction factor decreases.
194 | P a g e
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering and Technology [IJRPET]
ISSN: 2454-7875
VOLUME 3, ISSUE 6, Jun.-2017
CONCLUSION:
Nusselt no Vs Friction factor
(60 degree) This research work will lead to findings on the effect of
artificial rough surface on heat transfer enhancement in
12000
triangular duct. It is expected from this research work that
10000
the applications of artificial rough surface will enhance the
8000
heat transfer in triangular duct by providing turbulence
6000 Nu Vs f
movement of fluid in triangular duct.
4000
Nu Vs f
2000
0 REFERENCES:
1) Raed Abed Mahdi, H A. Mohammed , K. M.
0.01140.01160.01180.0120.0122
Munisamy,"Improvement of Convection Heat Transfer
by Using Porous Media and Nanofluid: Review",
Graph 6: Nusselt no. Vs friction factor for 600 rib angle.
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR),
Results graphs and discussion for 600 rib angle plate. India Online ISSN: 2319-7064,Volume 2 Issue 8,
1. From graph 5 it is found that as increasing Nusselt August 2013,pp 34-47
number Reynolds no. increases. It is found also that for 2) Gaurav Bharadwaj, Varun & Avdhesh Sharma,
”Thermo hydraulic performance of an equilateral
Reynolds number 2596 having higher Nusselt number
as compared to Reynolds number 2728. triangular duct with artificial roughness used insolar
2. From graph 6 it is found that as increasing Nusselt air heater”, International Journal of Mechanical and
Industrial Engineering (IJMIE) ISSN No. 2231 –6477,
number friction factor decreases. It is found also that for
friction factor 0.01175 having higher Nusselt number Vol-2, Iss-3, 2012, pp1-6.
as compared to friction factor 0.0119 3) ThamerKhalif Salem, Raaid R. Jassem & Manar Salih
Mahdi,” thermally developing mixed convection in
From above experimentation, it is found that for
Reynolds number 2596 having higher Nusselt number ahorizontal equilateral triangular channel”, IJRRAS,
as compared to Reynolds number 2728 of both angled Vol16, Issue1/ 16, 2013, pp1-17.
4) Hussein Togun, S.N. Kazi, Ahmed Badarudin, “A
plates.
Review of Experimental Study of Turbulent Heat
7.EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION: Transfer in Separated Flow,”Australian Journal of
Basic and Applied Sciences, ISSN 1991-8178, 5(10),
a. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP:
2011, pp489-505.
5) Mohammed Ghanem Jehad, “Experimental Study of the
Friction Factor in Equilateral Triangular Duct With
Different types of Vorex Generators (Obstacles)”,Al-
Qadisiya Journal For Engineering Sciences, Vol. 3. No.
2 2010, pp 6- 172.
Sectional view of test section
6) A. Tamayol,M. Bahrami, “Analytical Solutions for
Laminar Fully-Developed Flow in Micro channels with
Non-Circular Cross-Section”, Copyright © 2009 by
ASME
7) H. C. CLAIBORNE,” Laminar Flow Velocity Distributions
and Heat Transfer Characteristics f o r Noncircular
Ducts w i t h Fully Developed Hydmdynamic and
menn81 Boundary Layers”, OAK RIDGE NATIONAL
LASORATCSRY,MAY 1951,pp1-45.
Photograph of Experimental plate
SPECIFICATIONS:
I) TEST SECTION:
Dimensions of triangular duct (W=200mm, H=350,
e=10mm, P=80mm).
e/Dh = Relative roughness height =
P/e = Relative roughness pitch= 8.
Value of angle of attack (α) for making roughness is 450
And 600.
195 | P a g e