Mercantile Reviewer UP 2016 NEGO PDF
Mercantile Reviewer UP 2016 NEGO PDF
Mercantile Reviewer UP 2016 NEGO PDF
NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENTS LAW
PAGE 10 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
PAGE 11 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
The drawee pays the The drawee pays SUM PAYABLE MUST BE CERTAIN
payee from his own directly from the
funds. Afterwards, particular fund Sec. 2, NIL. What constitutes certainty as to
the drawee pays indicated. sum. - The sum payable is a sum certain within
himself from the the meaning of this Act, although it is to be
indicated fund. paid:
Note: A sum is certain if from the face of the interest, if any, but the obligation to pay the
instrument it can be determined even if it note remains.
requires mathematical computation.
(Sundiang and Aquino)
AT A FIXED TIME
PAGE 15 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
B. DETERMINATION OF
Fictitious Payee Rule NEGOTIABILITY
• It is not necessary that the person
referred to in the instrument is really non- • In determining the negotiability of an
existent or fictitious to make the instrument, the instrument in its entirety
instrument payable to bearer. The person and by what appears on its face must be
to whose order the instrument is made considered. It must comply with the
payable may in fact be existing but he is requirements of Sec. 1 of the Negotiable
still fictitious or non-existent under Sec. Instruments Law. [Caltex Phils. v. CA, G.R.
9(c) of the NIL if the person making it so No. 97753 (1992)]
payable does not intend to pay the
specified persons. [PNB v. Rodriguez, G.R. • The acceptance of a bill of exchange is
No. 170325 (2008)] not important in the determination of its
negotiability. The nature of acceptance is
• A check drawn payable to the order of important only on the determination of
"CASH" is a check payable to bearer, and the kind of liabilities of the parties
the bank may pay it to the person
PAGE 16 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
involved. [PBCOM vs. Aruego, G.R. Nos. Manila Oil Refining, G.R. No. L-18103
L-25836-37 (1993)] (1922)]
Omissions and
Additional Provisions
Provisions That Do
That Do Not Affect
Not Affect
Negotiability
Negotiability
Note: Negotiability is
affected when
instrument contains a
promise or order to do
any act in addition to
the payment of
money.
Note:
• A confession of judgment is provision
given by the maker authorizing the
plaintiff's attorney to sign judgment and
issue execution for the value of the
instrument, costs, and attorney's fees.
This is also called a judgment cognivit
actionem. If accompanied by withdrawal
of plea, it is called judgment relicta
verificatione.
• A confession of judgment is not
recognized in our country, as it is against
public policy. It denies due process, and
deprives the right of appeal. [PNB v.
PAGE 17 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
PAGE 19 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
C. EFFECT OF ANTE-DATING AND In this case a real defense exists and not even
POST-DATING a holder in due course can recover on the
instrument, for the law is specific that it is not
a valid contract in the hands of any holder.
Sec. 12, NIL. Ante-dated and post-dated. - The (Campos)
instrument is not invalid for the reason only
that it is ante-dated or post-dated, provided Note: A drawee bank whose negligent
custody of the checks, after partial execution,
this is not done for an illegal or fraudulent
purpose. The person to whom an instrument contributed to its escape, is estopped from
so dated is delivered acquires the title thereto raising the real defense under Sec. 15 of the
NIL. (Campos)
as of the date of delivery.
Delivery
Completeness
When Enforceable
PAGE 21 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
Kind of Defense
Rights of Holder
PAGE 22 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
Indorsers subsequent to forgery are liable because Indorsers may be made liable to those persons who
of their warranties. obtain title through their indorsements.
Indorsers subsequent to forgery are liable because Indorsers may be made liable to those persons who
of their warranties. obtain title through their indorsements.
PAGE 25 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
PAGE 26 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
G. ACCEPTANCE AND PAYMENT Rule: The drawee who pays the holder of the
UNDER MISTAKE bill cannot recover from the holder what he
paid under mistake. (Campos)
Sec. 62, NIL. Liability of acceptor. - The b) Stop Paym ent Order is one issued by
the drawer of a check countermanding
acceptor, by accepting the instrument,
engages that he will pay it according to the his first order to the drawee bank to pay
the check.
tenor of his acceptance and admits:
(1) The existence of the drawer, the Rule: The drawee bank is bound to follow the
genuineness of his signature, and his order, provided it is received prior to its
certification or payment of the check.
capacity and authority to draw the
instrument; and (Campos)
PAGE 27 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
VI. Consideration
B. BURDEN OF PROOF -
Sec. 25, NIL. Value, what constitutes. — Value PRESUMPTION OF CONSIDERATION
is any consideration sufficient to support a
simple contract. An antecedent or pre-existing Sec. 24, NIL. Presumption of consideration. -
debt constitutes value; and is deemed such Every negotiable instrument is deemed prima
whether the instrument is payable on demand facie to have been issued for a valuable
or at a future time. consideration; and every person whose
signature appears thereon to have become a
party thereto for value.
Sec. 191, NIL. Definition and meaning of
terms. - In this Act, unless the contract
Because of the presumption, it is immaterial
otherwise requires:
whether or not “for value received” appears in
x---x
the instrument.
"Value" means valuable consideration;
x---x
C. EFFECT OF WANT OF
“Value” and “consideration” are generally
convertible terms. However, they may have CONSIDERATION
different implications.
“Consideration” is the proper term when the Sec. 28, NIL. Effect of want of consideration. -
payee of a note sues the maker, or the payee Absence or failure of consideration is a matter
of a bill sues the drawer, or an indorsee sues of defense as against any person not a holder
his immediate indorser. in due course; and partial failure of
consideration is a defense pro tanto, whether
“Value” is the proper term when a holder the failure is an ascertained and liquidated
sues any party to the instrument with whom amount or otherwise.
he himself has not dealt, the term “value” is
more appropriate.
An antecedent or pre-existing debt Absence or failure of consideration is a
constitutes value; and is deemed such matter of defense as against any person not a
whether the instrument is payable on holder in due course, hence, it is a personal
demand or at a future time. [Sec. 25, NIL] defense.
Value need not be full and a holder will be Partial failure of consideration is a defense
one for value even if he gave less than the pro tanto, meaning a defense to the extent of
face value of the instrument, provided the the failure. (Abad)
intention of the transferor is to transfer the
full amount represented by the instrument.
Effect of an illicit or unlawful
consideration: Illicit or illegal
A. WHO IS A HOLDER FOR VALUE consideration does not affect the negotiability
(HFV)? of the instrument as validity of consideration
is not one of the requisites of a negotiable
instrument. It is merely constitutes a defect of
1. A holder of an instrument for which value, title hence such illegality of consideration is
which need not be in full, has been given
merely a personal defense which cannot be
at any given time but only with respect to raised against a holder in due course. [Sec. 55
all parties who have become parties to
and 57, NIL] [2009 bar question]
the instrument prior to the time at which
value has been given. [Sec 26, NIL]
2. A holder who has a lien on the instrument
but only to the extent of his lien. [Sec 27,
NIL] (2011 Bar Question)
PAGE 29 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
PAGE 30 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
Sec. 30, NIL. What constitutes negotiation. - Sec. 191, NIL. Definition and meaning of
An instrument is negotiated when it is terms. - In this Act, unless the contract
transferred from one person to another in such otherwise requires:
manner as to constitute the transferee the x---x
holder thereof. If payable to bearer, it is "Delivery" means transfer of possession,
negotiated by delivery; if payable to order, it is actual or constructive, from one person to
negotiated by the indorsement of the holder another;
and completed by delivery. x---x
"Issue" means the first delivery of the
instrument, complete in form, to a person who
A. NEGOTIATION DISTINGUISHED takes it as a holder;
FROM ASSIGNMENT x---x
Requisites
Negotiation Assignment (1) Mechanical act of writing the instrument
completely and in accordance with the
The transfer of the The transferee does requirements of Section 1 of the NIL; and
instrument from one not become a holder,
person to another so nor can he become a (2) The delivery of the complete instrument
as to constitute the holder in due course; by the maker or drawer, with the
transferee the holder and he merely steps intention of giving effect to it, to the
thereof. [Sec.30, NIL] into the shoes of the payee or holder.
transferor. As such,
any defense available
against the transferor Presumption of delivery
is available against • Where the instrument is no longer in the
the transferee. possession of a party whose signature
appears thereon, a valid and intentional
delivery by him is presumed until the
B. MODES OF NEGOTIATION contrary is proved [Sec. 16, NIL]
• If it is in the hands of a holder in due
Sec. 30, NIL. What constitutes negotiation. - course, the presumption of a valid
An instrument is negotiated when it is delivery is conclusive [Sec. 16, NIL]
transferred from one person to another in such
manner as to constitute the transferee the
holder thereof. If payable to bearer, it is Presumption as to date
negotiated by delivery; if payable to order, it is
negotiated by the indorsement of the holder • Date is not an essential element of
negotiability; it is not included in the
PAGE 31 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
B.2.A. INDORSEM ENT; HOW DONE Sec. 43, NIL. Indorsement where name is
misspelled, and so forth. - Where the name of
Sec. 31, NIL. Indorsement; how made. - The a payee or indorsee is wrongly designated or
indorsement must be written on the misspelled, he may indorse the instrument as
instrument itself or upon a paper attached therein described adding, if he thinks fit, his
thereto. The signature of the indorser, without proper signature.
additional words, is a sufficient indorsement.
PAGE 32 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
and it may also be either restrictive or qualified • Specifies the person to whom/to whose
or conditional. order the instrument is to be payable; and
the indorsement of such indorsee is
necessary to further negotiation.
Four bases of classification of • A special indorser is liable to all
indorsem ents under the NIL: subsequent holders, unless the
(1) Special or in blank instrument is an originally bearer
instrument, in which case he is liable only
(2) Restrictive or Non-Restrictive to those who take title through his
(3) Qualified or unqualified indorsement. [Sec. 40, NIL]
restrictive.
(1) Qualified
• Constitutes indorser as mere assignor of
Sec. 37, NIL. Effect of restrictive indorsement; title
rights of indorsee. - A restrictive indorsement • Made by adding the words “without
confers upon the indorsee the right: recourse”, “sans recourse,” “indorser not
(a) to receive payment of the instrument; holder,” “at the indorser’s own riske,” and
other terms of similar import. [Sec. 38,
(b) to bring any action thereon that the NIL].
indorser could bring;
• But this does not mean that the
(c) to transfer his rights as such indorsee, transferee only has the rights of an
where the form of the indorsement assignee; transfer remains a negotiation
authorizes him to do so. and transferee can still be a holder
But all subsequent indorsees acquire only the capable of acquiring a title free from
title of the first indorsee under the restrictive defenses of prior parties.
indorsement. Effects:
1. Relieves the qualified indorser of his
(1) Restrictive – Such indorsement either: liability to pay the instrument should the
maker be unable to pay
(a) Prohibits further negotiation of
instrument 2. The qualified indorser does not guarantee
the solvency of the maker, but merely his
(b) Constitutes indorsee as agent of legal title to the instrument
indorser
3. A qualified indorsement does not impair
Vests title in indorsee in trust for another [Sec the negotiable charater of the
36, NIL] intstrument
(2) Non-qualified
RIGHTS OF RESTRICTIVE INDORSEE
• Receive payment C.4. AS TO PRESENCE/ABSENCE OF
• Bring any action thereon that the indorser EXPRESS LIMITATIONS
could bring.
Sec. 39, NIL. Conditional indorsement. - Where
• Transfer his rights as such indorsee, but an indorsement is conditional, the party
all subsequent indorsees acquire only the required to pay the instrument may disregard
title of first indorsee under restrictive the condition and make payment to the
indorsement. [Sec 37, NIL] indorsee or his transferee whether the
condition has been fulfilled or not. But any
(2) Non-restrictive
person to whom an instrument so indorsed is
negotiated will hold the same, or the proceeds
thereof, subject to the rights of the person
C.3. AS TO KIND OF LIABILITY ASSUMED
indorsing conditionally.
BY INDORSER
Sec. 38, NIL. Qualified indorsement. - A
qualified indorsement constitutes the indorser (1) Conditional
a mere assignor of the title to the instrument.
It may be made by adding to the indorser's • Additional condition annexed to
signature the words "without recourse" or any indorser’s liability; such condition must
words of similar import. Such an indorsement be expressed
does not impair the negotiable character of • Where an indorsement is conditional, a
the instrument. party required to pay the instrument may
PAGE 34 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
person adds to his signature words some person under whom he claims acquired
indicating that he signs for or on behalf of the title as holder in due course. But the last-
a principal or in a representative capacity, mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a
he is not liable on the instrument if he party who became bound on the instrument
was duly authorized; but the mere prior to the acquisition of such defective title.
addition of words describing him as an
agent, or as filling a representative
character, without disclosing his principal, B.1. WHO ARE HOLDERS IN DUE COURSE
does not exempt him from personal
(1) Holder in due course [HDC] under Sec. 52,
liability.
NIL
(2) Payment in due course to the
(2) HDC under Sec. 58, NIL: A holder who
holder discharges instrum ent
DERIVES title to the instrument through
a HDC has all the rights of the latter even
though he himself satisfies none of the
B. HOLDER IN DUE COURSE [HDC] requirements of due course holding
(2nd Most Frequently Asked since 1992)
HDC under Sec. 59, NIL
[presum ption]: Every holder is deemed
Sec. 52, NIL. What constitutes a holder in due prima facie to be a holder in due course
course. - A holder in due course is a holder Sec. 191 of the NIL defines holder as the
who has taken the instrument under the payee or indorsee of a bill or note, who is in
following conditions: possession of it, or the bearer thereof. The
(a) That it is complete and regular upon word “holder” in the first clause of Sec. 52
its face; and in the second subsection thereof may be
(b) That he became the holder of it replaced by the definition in Sec. 191 so as to
before it was overdue, and without read “a holder in due course is a payee or an
notice that it has been previously indorsee in possession, etc.” [De Ocampo vs.
dishonored, if such was the fact, Gatchalian, G.R. No. L-15126 (1961)]
(c) That he took it in good faith and for
value;
(d) That at the time it was negotiated to B.2. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DUE COURSE
him he had no notice of any infirmity HOLDING
in the instrument or defect in the title • The question of whether a holder is a
of the person negotiating it. holder in due course or not is significant
only when there is an existing defense
Sec. 58, NIL. When subject to original between prior parties. (Campos)
defense. - In the hands of any holder other • A holder in due course can acquire a
than a holder in due course, a negotiable better title than his predecessors because
instrument is subject to the same defenses as he takes the instrument free from any
if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who defect of title of prior parties. He is
derives his title through a holder in due furthermore free from defenses available
course, and who is not himself a party to any to prior parties among themselves.
fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, (Campos)
has all the rights of such former holder in
respect of all parties prior to the latter. • A holder not in due course, on the other
hand, takes the instrument subject to all
defenses because he is treated as a
Section 59, NIL. Who is deemed holder in due transferee of a non-negotiable paper.
course. - Every holder is deemed prima facie Real defenses, however, which attach to
to be a holder in due course; but when it is the instrument itself would be available
shown that the title of any person who has even against a holder in due course.
negotiated the instrument was defective, the (Campos)
burden is on the holder to prove that he or
PAGE 36 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
PAGE 37 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
PAGE 39 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
B.5. PRESUMPTION IN FAVOR OF DUE Holder in Due Course Not Holder in Due
COURSE HOLDING Course
Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a
Rights
holder in due course. [Sec. 59, NIL]
(1) Burden shifts when it is shown that the Has the right to Has the right to
title of any person who has negotiated enforce payment, sue enforce payment, sue
the instrument was defective. Holder in his own name, and in his own name, and
must then prove that he or some person negotiate the negotiate the
under whom he claims acquired the title instrument instrument
as a holder in due course.
(2) But the last mentioned rule does not
apply in favor of a party who became C. DEFENSES AGAINST THE HOLDER
bound on the instrument prior to the
acquisition of such defective title.
Real Defenses Personal Defenses
Defenses
PAGE 40 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
should the primary party have refused to pay take, he will pay the amount thereof to the
upon such presentment. (Campos) holder, or to any subsequent indorser who
may be compelled to pay it.
B.1. DRAWER
W ho is a qualified indorser? One who is
Sec. 61, NIL. Liability of drawer. – The drawer
constituted as a mere assignor of the title to
by drawing the instrument admits the
existence of the payee and his then capacity the instrument by adding to his signature the
words "without recourse" or any words of
to indorse; and engages that on due
similar import.
presentment the instrument will be accepted
or paid, or both, according to its tenor, and A qualified indorser does not assume the
that if it be dishonored, and the necessary liability to pay the instrument since he is
proceedings on dishonor be duly taken, he merely an assignor of the title to the
will pay the amount thereof to the holder, or instrument. However, he becomes liable once
to any subsequent indorser who may be he breaches a warranty.
compelled to pay it. but the drawer ay insert
in the instrument an express stipulation
negativing or limiting his own liability to the W ho is a general or unqualified
holder. indorser? Every person who indorses
without qualification [Sec. 66, NIL]
A person placing his signature upon an
The drawer warrants the existence of the
instrument other than as a maker, drawer, or
payee and the latter’s capacity to indorse the
acceptor unless he indicates by appropriate
instrument at the time of its issuance.
words his intention to be bound in some other
(Campos)
capacity [Sec. 63, NIL]
A person, who places his signature on an
B.2. INDORSERS instrument negotiable by delivery, incurs all
the liabilities of an indorser [Sec. 67, NIL]
The following indorsers assume the liability
to pay the instrument: The general indorser makes two contracts:
(1) General or Unqualified Indorser; and (1) An assignment or sale of the
instrument; and
(2) Irregular Indorser
(2) A special contract of indorsement
XI. Warranties
B.3. ORDER OF LIABILITY AMONG
INDORSERS
The primary or secondary liability of the
Sec. 68, NIL. Order in which indorsers are
liable. – As respects one another, indorsers parties should be distinguished from their
are liable prima facie in the order in which warranties.
they indorse; but evidence is admissible to (1) Primary or secondary liability of the
show that as between or among themselves parties makes them liable to pay the
they have agreed otherwise. Joint payees or sum certain in money stated in the
joint indorsees who indorse are deemed to instrument.
indorse jointly and severally.
(2) Warranties are affirmations of the
fact on the part of the parties that
impose no direct obligation to pay in
Among themselves, indorsers are liable prima
the absence of breach thereof.
facie in the order they indorse.
(Aquino)
Sec. 68 does not bind the holder, and he may
In case of breach of warranties, the person
sue any of the indorsers, regardless of the
who breached the same may either be liable
order of their indorsement. (Campos)
or he may be barred from asserting a
particular defense.
Promissory Note Bill of Exchange
C. ACCEPTOR’S WARRANTIES
PAGE 43 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
A. PRESENTMENT; MEANING
D. GENERAL INDORSER’S
WARRANTIES Presentment for payment is the presentation
of the instrument, whether a note or a bill, to
the person primarily liable for the purpose of
(1) That the instrument is genuine in and
demanding and obtaining payment thereof.
in all respects what it purports to be (Campos)
(2) That he has a good title to it
(1) The production of a Bill of Exchange to
(3) That all prior parties had capacity to the drawer or acceptor for payment; or
contract
(2) The production of a Promissory Note to
(4) That the instrument is, at the time of the party liable for payment.
his indorsement, valid and subsisting
[Sec. 66, NIL]
These warranties are in favor of all
B. DATE AND TIME OF PRESENTMENT
subsequent holders in due course. [Ang Tiong
v. Ting, G.R. No. L-26767 (1968)] Sec. 72, NIL. What constitutes sufficient
presentment. - Presentment for payment, to
be sufficient, must be made:
E. QUALIFIED INDORSER’S (a) By the holder, or by some person
WARRANTIES authorized to receive payment on his
behalf;
(1) That the instrument is genuine in and in (b) At a reasonable hour on a business
all respects what it purports to be day;
(c) At a proper place as herein defined;
(2) That he has a good title to it (d) To the person primarily liable on the
(3) That all prior parties had capacity to instrument, or if he is absent or
contract inaccessible, to any person found at
the place where the presentment is
(4) That he has no knowledge of any fact made.
which would impair the validity of the
instrument or render it valueless. [Sec. 68,
NIL] (1) Bearing fixed m aturity/not
payable on demand – on the day it
falls due [Secs. 71 and 85, NIL]
(2) Payable on demand – within a
reasonable time after its issue [Sec. 7,
NIL]
(3) Dem and bill of exchange – within a
reasonable time after the last negotiation.
[Sec. 71, NIL]
Presentment for payment cannot be made on
a Sunday or legal holiday, and if the note
matures on such a day, since the maker
cannot be compelled to pay sooner than he
promised, the note or bill will have to be
presented on the next business day. (Campos)
PAGE 44 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
Note: Notice must be given to persons Notice may be given as soon as the
secondarily liable. Otherwise, such parties instrument is dishonored [Sec. 102, NIL]
are discharged. Notice may be given to the
party himself or to his agent.
C. WHEN NOT NECESSARY TO GIVE TO
A.1. TO WHOM IN GENERAL DRAWER
PAGE 46 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
PAGE 47 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
I. WAIVER
XIV. Discharge of
Notice of dishonor may be waived either
before the time of giving notice has arrived or
Negotiable Instrument
after the omission to give due notice, and the
waiver may be expressed or implied. [Sec. 109, Discharge: The release of all parties,
NIL] whether primary or secondary, from the
Where the waiver is embodied in the obligation on the instrument. It renders the
instrument itself, it is binding upon all instrument without force and effect and,
parties; but, where it is written above the consequently, non-negotiable (De Leon)
signature of an indorser, it binds him only.
[Sec. 110, NIL]
A. DISCHARGE OF NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENT
J. DISPENSATION WITH NOTICE
Notice of dishonor is dispensed with: Sec. 119, NIL. Instrument; How discharged. - A
(1) When party to be notified knows about negotiable instrument is discharged:
the dishonor, actually or constructively (1) By payment in due course by or on behalf
[Secs. 114-117, NIL] of the principal debtor;
(2) If waived [Sec. 109, NIL] (2) By payment in due course by the party
(3) When after due diligence, it cannot be accommodated, where the instrument is
given [Sec. 112, NIL] made or accepted for his
accommodation;
(3) By the intentional cancellation thereof by
K. EFFECT OF FAILURE TO GIVE the holder;
NOTICE (4) By any other act which will discharge a
simple contract for the payment of
Failure to give notice to parties secondarily money;
liable discharges such parties
(5) When the principal debtor becomes the
An omission to give notice of dishonor by holder of the instrument at or after
non-acceptance does not prejudice the rights maturity in his own right.
of a holder in due course subsequent to the
omission [Sec. 117, NIL]
Note: A holder in due course cannot be B. BY PAYMENT IN DUE COURSE
prejudiced by the failure or neglect of a (2000 Bar Question)
previous holder to give notice of dishonor by
Sec. 51, NIL. Right of Holder to Sue for
non-acceptance.
Payment. – The holder of a negotiable
A dishonor by non-payment necessarily instrument may sue thereon in his own name;
presupposes the instrument has matured, and payment to him in due course discharges
and therefore, no holder subsequent thereto the instrument.
can be a holder in due course. Such dishonor
by non-payment will thus prejudice al
subsequent holders. (Campos) Sec. 88, NIL. What Constitutes Payment in
Due Course. - Payment is made in due course
when it is made at or after the maturity of the
payment to the holder thereof in good faith
and without notice that his title is defective.
(Sec. 88)
PAGE 48 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
PAGE 49 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
accommodation and has been paid by third person, and has been paid by the
the party accommodated. drawer;
(2) Where it was made or accepted for
accommodation, and has been paid by
• Where instrument negotiated back to a the party accommodated.
prior party, such party may reissue and
further negotiate, but he is not entitled
to enforce payment against any
• The discharge of a secondary party is not
intervening party to whom he was
the same as the discharge of the
personally liable
instrument. The discharge of the
instrument prevents subsequent holders
from becoming holders in due course.
Sec. 50, NIL. When prior party may negotiate
instrument. - Where an instrument is
negotiated back to a prior party, such party
I. RENUNCIATION BY HOLDER
may, subject to the provisions of this Act,
reissue and further negotiable the same. But
he is not entitled to enforce payment thereof Sec. 122, NIL. Renunciation by Holder. - The
against any intervening party to whom he holder may expressly renounce his rights
was personally liable. against any party to the instrument before,
at, or after its maturity. An absolute and
unconditional renunciation of his rights
• Where instrument is paid by party against the principal debtor made at or after
secondarily liable, it is not discharged, the maturity of the instrument discharges the
but instrument. But a renunciation does not
affect the rights of a holder in due course
(a) the party so paying it is remitted to without notice. A renunciation must be in
his former rights as regard to all prior writing, unless the instrument is delivered up
parties to the person primarily liable thereon.
(b) and he may strike out his own and all
subsequent indorsements, and again
negotiate instrument, except: where Two forms of renunciation
it is payable to order of 3rd party and (1) A written declaration to that effect; or
has been paid by drawer or where it’s
made/accepted for accommodation (2) By surrender of the instrument to the
and has been paid by party primary party.
accommodated
C. KINDS OF ACCEPTANCE
E.2. IMPLIED ACCEPTANCE
(1) General – assents without qualification
to the order of the drawer [Sec. 139, NIL] (1) If the drawee refuses to return the
instrument within 24 hours after it was
(2) Qualified –which in express terms
delivered for acceptance.
varies the effect of the bill as drawn [Secs.
141 & 142, NIL]: (2) If the drawee destroys the same.
(a) Conditional – makes payment by (3) If the drawee makes an unconditional
the acceptor dependent on the promise in writing before the instrument is
fulfillment of a condition therein drawn, with respect to every person who,
stated upon the faith thereof, receives the bill for
value.
(b) Partial – an acceptance to pay part
only of the amount for which the bill
is drawn.
F. TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE
(c) Local – an acceptance to pay only at [Sec. 136, NIL]
a particular place.
• The drawee is allowed twenty-four hours
(d) Qualified as to time after presentment in which to decide
(e) The acceptance of some one or more whether or not he will accept the bill.
of the drawees but not of all. • The acceptance, if given, dates as of the
day of presentation.
D. PROOF OF ACCEPTANCE
(Sundiang and Aquino) G. RULES GOVERNING ACCEPTANCE
The written acceptance may be in the
instrument itself or in a separate instrument. Implication of payment without acceptance
However, under Sec. 133, “the holder of a bill by a drawee [FEBTC vs. Gold Palace Jewellery
presenting the same for acceptance may Co,, Nachura, G.R. No. 168274 (2008)]
require the acceptance be written on the bill,
PAGE 53 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
person not having capacity to contract by on demand may, at the option of the holder
bill. be presented for payment before twelve
o’clock noon on Saturday when that entire day
(2) Where, after the exercise of reasonable
is not a holiday. [Sec. 85, NIL]
diligence, presentment cannot be made.
(3) Where, although presentment has been
irregular, acceptance has been refused on F. HOW MADE
some other ground. [Sec. 148,NIL] [Sec. 145, NIL]
In general:
D. TIME/PLACE/MANNER OF (1) By or on behalf of the holder
PRESENTMENT (2) At a reasonable hour
H. DISHONOR BY NON-ACCEPTANCE
Time of maturity: Every negotiable
instrument is payable at the time fixed therein W hen dishonored by non-acceptance:
without grace. When they day of maturity A bill is dishonored by non-acceptance:
falls upon Sunday, or a holiday, the
instrument is payable on the next succeeding (1) When it is duly presented for acceptance
business day. Instruments falling due or and such an acceptance as is prescribed
becoming payable on Saturday are to be by this Act is refused or cannot be
presented for payment on the next succeeding obtained; or
business day, except that instrument payable
PAGE 55 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
PAGE 56 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
PAGE 57 OF 320
UP LAW BOC NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW MERCANTILE LAW
D.1. TIME
When to present? A check must be presented
for payment within reasonable time after its
issue.
E. EFFECT OF DELAY
Effects:
(1) Equivalent to acceptance [Sec. 187, NIL]
and is the operative act that makes banks
liable
(2) Assignment of the funds of the drawer in
the hands of the drawee [Sec. 189, NIL]
(3) If obtained by the holder, discharges the
persons secondarily liable thereon [Sec.
188, NIL]
PAGE 58 OF 320