Diagnosis Malaria
Diagnosis Malaria
Diagnosis Malaria
Approach
Diagnosis of this potentially fatal disease rests on a high index of suspicion in a patient
with suggestive symptoms and an appropriate travel history. Whilst epidemiological maps
of malaria endemicity may be useful in determining risk for the purpose of pre-travel
advice regarding prophylaxis, such an approach may be dangerous in the setting of
managing a febrile patient returning from an area bordering a malaria area; conditions on
the ground can change.
Treatment depends on the infecting species, the parasite burden, and the clinical status
of the patient; thus, history, examination, and laboratory tests should focus on determining
these factors.
Most countries require reporting of malaria so that epidemiological data can be collected.
In the US, healthcare providers should report all cases of laboratory-confirmed malaria
occurring in the US and its territories to their local or state health department.
History
Most patients with Plasmodium falciparum infection present in the first month after
exposure; almost all present within 3 months of exposure. P vivax or P ovale infections
commonly present later than 3 months after exposure, and presentation may even be
delayed for 1 year or more. [24]
Symptoms are non-specific and common to many other infections. Fever, or history of
fever, is universal. Characteristic paroxysms of chills and rigors followed by fever and
sweats may be described. Patterns of fever are rarely diagnostic at presentation but may
develop over time: fevers occurring at regular intervals of 48 to 72 hours may be
associated with P vivax , P ovale , or P malariae infections. Other very common
symptoms include headache, weakness, myalgia, and arthralgia. Less common
symptoms include anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and abdominal pain. Many
children present only with influenza-like respiratory symptoms. [46] History should also
focus on whether risk factors for severe disease are present (e.g., low host immunity,
pregnancy, child <5 years of age, immunocompromise, older age).
History of travel to an endemic area is the key diagnostic factor in patients presenting with
fever in non-endemic countries. However, travel history is frequently overlooked. History
of travel to a malaria endemic area in the past 12 months should be elicited if a patient
presents with non-specific symptoms. If travel history is positive, the patient should be
asked if antimalarial prophylaxis was taken. If taken, the specific drug should be
determined and whether it was taken in the correct manner. As reporting is often
unreliable, the use of prophylaxis does not exclude malaria infection; however, it may
influence selection of the treatment regimen if malaria is confirmed.
Physical examination
Clinical status of the patient should be assessed. There are very few physical signs to
elicit that are specific for malaria. It is important to determine whether a complication of
severe malaria is present (suggested by jaundice, confusion or altered level of
consciousness, seizures, hypotension, respiratory distress, or anuria/oliguria) or whether
there is concurrent bacterial infection (suggested by presence of focal signs: e.g.,
crackles on lung auscultation suggesting super-imposed pneumonia). Signs often present
include hepatosplenomegaly (although not common at time of initial presentation in the
first-world setting) and/or pallor (suggesting anaemia).
Laboratory examination
Light microscopy
The detection of malaria parasites in the blood is essential. In skilled hands, the most
sensitive and specific test readily available is light microscopy of Giemsa-stained blood
smears, and this is the diagnostic test of choice. Wright or Field stains are alternatives to
Giemsa. When to use these alternatives is a laboratory decision and may vary locally.
Thick films enable a relatively large amount of blood to be screened for parasites, but
species determination may be difficult as red cells are lysed and parasite morphology may
be distorted. Thin film preparations allow speciation, which will affect treatment decisions.
The percentage of parasitaemia can be assessed using a simple formula but may be
extremely low, and false-negative thick smears may occur. [47] If there is a strong
suspicion of malaria, the test should be repeated daily for 3 days.
[Figure caption and citation for the preceding image starts]:Giemsa-stained slide
revealing Plasmodium falciparum , P ovale , P malariae, and P
vivax gametocytesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Image Library; used with
permission[Citation ends].
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs)
Rapid diagnostic tests are immunochromatographic tests that detect the presence of
parasite antigens on a finger prick sample. Different types detect either P falciparum -
specific histidine-rich protein-2 (HRP-2) or species-specific parasite lactate
dehydrogenase (pLDH). [48] A number of tests have been evaluated in returned
travellers, with most generating sensitivity and specificity values for P falciparum of over
85% to 90%. [48]Problems have included poor detection of species other than P
falciparum and false-negative results at lower parasite burden. [48] [49] However, some
studies have shown that performance of RDTs can be equivalent to expert
microscopy. [50] [51]
The main advantage of RDTs is that they provide a means for rapid diagnosis, especially
in health resource-limited areas where microscopy is not available or reliable. Their
incorporation into treatment algorithms may substantially reduce prescribing of
antimalarials when compared with clinical diagnosis alone, although an improvement in
health outcomes has not been proven. [52]
The disadvantages of RDTs include the inability to distinguish between active infection
and recently treated infection. In addition, even with a positive RDT, a blood film is still
necessary for confirmation of species (non-falciparum) and for a parasite count to help
guide treatment (falciparum).
The choice between RDTs and microscopy depends on local circumstances, including
the skills available, patient caseload, epidemiology of malaria, and the possible use of
microscopy for the diagnosis of other diseases. [53] A systematic review found that pLDH
tests had a higher specificity, whereas the HRP-2 tests had better sensitivity and slightly
greater accuracy, when compared to each other. [54] A combination of both tests, if
possible, may be more reliable.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
PCR is usually only available in reference laboratories. It may be used to confirm the
diagnosis of malaria in cases where microscopy is negative but there is a high clinical
suspicion of disease, [55] [56] or to determine the species when it is not possible to
distinguish on light microscopy.
PCR can play a useful role in the diagnosis of malaria in pregnancy, as sequestration of
parasites in the placenta can lead to a parasite count in the peripheral blood below the
threshold for microscopic detection in blood films. [57]
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)
Baseline tests include an FBC, a clotting profile, renal and liver function tests,
blood glucose, and urinalysis. In cases of severe malaria, blood gas analysis is
necessary to exclude metabolic or lactic acidosis. HIV testing is usually indicated,
as malaria may be more severe in the presence of HIV infection. If concurrent
bacterial infection is suspected, blood, sputum, and urine cultures should be
requested. Lumbar puncture may be indicated to exclude meningitis. In addition,
PCR of nasopharyngeal swabs may be considered to exclude influenza infection,
which can present in an identical manner.
Imaging
A chest x-ray helps exclude other diagnoses (e.g., pneumonia, legionnaires' disease,
pulmonary tuberculosis) when investigating patients returning from abroad with a fever.
In addition, a chest x-ray is indicated if there is suspicion of severe malaria, particularly
with respiratory symptoms or signs, or if consciousness level is reduced (to exclude
aspiration).
Pregnancy: all types of malaria increase the risk of miscarriage. Pregnancy leads to
higher percentage parasitaemia and anaemia in Plasmodium falciparum infection.
Age <5 years: children are less likely than adults to complain of chills, myalgia, or
headaches, and more likely to present with non-specific symptoms.
fever or hx of fever
Fever, or history of fever, is universal. Characteristic paroxysms of chills and rigors
followed by fever and sweats may be described. Usually associated tachycardia.
Patterns of fever are rarely diagnostic at presentation but may develop over time: fevers
occurring at regular intervals of 48 to 72 hours may be associated with P vivax , P ovale ,
or P malariae infections. In most patients there is no specific fever pattern.
headache
Non-specific but common complaint.
weakness
Non-specific but common complaint.
myalgia
Non-specific but common complaint.
arthralgia
Non-specific but common complaint.
anorexia
Non-specific symptom.
diarrhoea
Non-specific symptom.
UNCOMMON
seizures
Suggests falciparum infection, which is almost always the cause of severe disease.
However, febrile illnesses reduce seizure threshold in known epileptic patients.
abdominal pain
Non-specific symptom.
pallor
Anaemia is often present.
hepatosplenomegaly
Common presenting sign, although not common at time of initial presentation in the first-
world setting.
jaundice
Suggests falciparum infection, which is almost always the cause of severe disease.
hypotension
Suggests falciparum infection, which is almost always the cause of severe disease.
Circulatory shock may indicate concurrent sepsis.
anuria/oliguria
Suggests falciparum infection, which is almost always the cause of severe disease.
Risk factors
STRONG
Investigations
1st investigations to order
TEST RESULT
Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood smears detection of asexual
or sexual forms of
Considered the test of choice to identify parasites.The most the parasites inside
common asexual form seen is the trophozoite erythrocytes
.
[Figure caption and citation for the preceding image
starts]:Thin-film Giemsa-stained micrographs showing ring-
form Plasmodium vivaxand P
falciparum trophozoitesCenters for Disease Control and
Prevention Image Library/Steven Glenn, Laboratory &
Consultation Division; used with permission[Citation ends].
Thick films are more sensitive for detection of parasites than thin
films, as they allow for a greater volume of blood to be examined.
Non-immune individuals may be symptomatic at very low parasite
densities that may initially be undetectable. Therefore, if clinical
suspicion is high, smears should be repeated daily on 3
occasions. Thin blood smears permit species identification and
calculation of the parasitaemia (percentage of parasitised red
blood cells), both of which are necessary to determine appropriate
treatment.
[Figure caption and citation for the preceding image
starts]:Thick-film Giemsa-stained micrograph showing two
mature Plasmodium vivax schizonts, each containing
merozoitesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
Image Library; used with permission[Citation ends].
Emerging tests
TEST RESULT
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification detection of
parasites at very low
New commercial molecular assay. levels
DIFFERENTIAL
Dengue fever
SIGNS / SYMPTOMS INVESTIGATIONS
Abrupt onset of symptoms. Headache and eukopenia and
retrobulbar pain that worsens with eye movements is thrombocytopenia are common.
typical. A rash may be present in about half of
patients and may be petechial or otherwise PCR may detect dengue virus in
haemorrhagic. serum early in the illness.
Isolation of virus by tissue
culture is less common.
Antibodies may be detected
after resolution of the illness but
are not helpful in the acute
phase
Often asymptomatic.
Chikungunya virus
SIGNS / SYMPTOMS INVESTIGATIONS
Residence in/travel from chikungunya-endemic ELISA/indirect fluorescent
region. antibody is positive for
chikungunya antibodies.
Prominent joint symptoms (e.g., polyarthritis and
carpal tunnel syndrome are common). RT-PCR is positive for
chikungunya viral RNA.
Hyperpigmentation of skin and intertriginous lesions
are common.
Yellow fever
SIGNS / SYMPTOMS INVESTIGATIONS
Residence in/travel from yellow fever-endemic RT-PCR is positive for yellow
region. fever virus RNA in viraemic
phase (within 5 days of
Lack of yellow fever immunisation. symptom onset).
Haemorrhagic complications. Serology is positive for yellow
fever virus antibodies and
Biphasic illness (i.e., acute febrile illness lasting 2-6 increasing IgG titers in
days, followed by a 24-48 hour remission period, postviraemic phase (day 5
and then a more severe form of illness in some onwards).
patients, with jaundice, renal failure, hepatic failure,
and haemorrhagic complications). Both RT-PCR and serology are
recommended for samples
taken between days 5 and 7.
Pneumonia
SIGNS / SYMPTOMS INVESTIGATIONS
Respiratory symptoms prominent, (e.g., cough, Neutrophilia is often present.
haemoptysis, dyspnoea, chest pain). CRP may be markedly elevated.
Respiratory examination may reveal focal coarse Chest x-ray may demonstrate
crackles or consolidation. Hypoxia is common. Signs infiltrates or consolidation with
of pleural effusion may be present (e.g., dullness to or without effusion.
percussion, decreased breath sounds over affected
area). Sputum culture may reveal the
causative organism.
Criteria
Uncomplicated disease
Presents with symptoms of malaria and a positive parasitological test (i.e., light
microscopy or rapid diagnostic test), but with no features of severe malaria (criteria for
severe disease below). [53]
Severe disease
Patients are classified as having severe malaria if they have one or more of the
following: [53]
Clinical features
Impaired consciousness (i.e., Glasgow coma score <11 in adults or Blantyre coma score
<3 in children)
Prostration (i.e., generalised weakness so that the patient is unable to walk or sit up
without assistance)
Multiple convulsions (more than 2 episodes in 24 hours)
Deep breathing, respiratory distress (acidotic breathing)
Circulatory collapse or shock - systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg in adults and <70
mmHg in children (decompensated shock); capillary refill ≥3 seconds or temperature
gradient on leg (mid-to-proximal limb) without hypotension (compensated shock)
Clinical signs of jaundice
Significant bleeding (e.g., recurrent or prolonged bleeding from gums, nose, or
venepuncture sites; haematemesis; melaena)
Pulmonary oedema (radiological finding, or oxygen saturation <92% on room air with a
respiratory rate >30 breaths/minute often with chest indrawing and crepitations on
auscultation)
Laboratory findings