This document discusses many aspects of prostate cancer including risk factors, screening methods, diagnosis, staging, treatment options and outcomes. It reviews over 50 scholarly articles on prostate cancer covering topics such as screening, biopsy techniques, hormone therapy and its effectiveness.
This document discusses many aspects of prostate cancer including risk factors, screening methods, diagnosis, staging, treatment options and outcomes. It reviews over 50 scholarly articles on prostate cancer covering topics such as screening, biopsy techniques, hormone therapy and its effectiveness.
This document discusses many aspects of prostate cancer including risk factors, screening methods, diagnosis, staging, treatment options and outcomes. It reviews over 50 scholarly articles on prostate cancer covering topics such as screening, biopsy techniques, hormone therapy and its effectiveness.
This document discusses many aspects of prostate cancer including risk factors, screening methods, diagnosis, staging, treatment options and outcomes. It reviews over 50 scholarly articles on prostate cancer covering topics such as screening, biopsy techniques, hormone therapy and its effectiveness.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6
1. Epstein J. Pathology of prostatic neoplasia.
In: Wein A, Kovoussi L, Novick A, et
al. (eds) Campbell-Walsh Urology. Philadelphia, 2007, pp. 2874–82. 2. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010; 127: 2893–2917. 3. Mottet N, Schalken J, Heidenreich A, et al. Highlights on Prostate Cancer from Urological and Oncological Congresses in 2007. Eur Urol Suppl 2008; 7: 460–73. 4. Murai M, Cheng C, Khauli R, et al. Prostate cancer: 6th international consultation on new developments in prostate cancer and prostate diseases. 2006. Epub ahead of print 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.121. 5. Klein E, Platz E, Thompson I. Epidemiology, Etiology, and Prevention of Prostate Cancer. In: Wein A, Kovoussi L, Novick A, et al. (eds) Campbell-Walsh Urology. Philadelphia, 2007, pp. 2854–73. 6. Indonesian Society of Urologic Oncology (ISUO). ISUO Meeting 2011. 2011. 7. Kelompok Kerja Kanker Urologi RS. Cipto Mangunkusumo - RS. Kanker Dharmais. Panduan pengelolaan kanker prostat. Interna Publishing, 2009. 8. Umbas R, Muchtar C, Hamid R. Terapi radikal pada penderita kanker prostat: tindak lanjut jangka panjang dan faktor prediksi survival. Indones J Cancer 2010; 4: 55–60. 9. Safriadi F. Karakteristik dan pola penanganan Kanker prostat di RS. Hasan Sadikin Bandung. Indones J Cancer. 10. Mahadi E, Widjanarko S. Penanganan karsinoma prostat di RSUD dr. Moewardi Surakarta selama Januari 2000-Desember 2006. J Urol Indones 2009; 16: 25–28. 11. Gann PH. Risk factors for prostate cancer. Rev Urol 2002; 4 Suppl 5: S3–S10. 12. Wolk A. Diet, lifestyle and risk of prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 2005; 44: 277–81. 13. Kolonel L. Fat, meat, and prostate cancer. Epidemiol Rev 2001; 23: 72–81. -67- 14. Giovannucci E, Rimm E, Wolk A. Calcium and fructose intake in relation to risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 442–7. 15. Ostrander EA, Udler MS. The role of the BRCA2 gene in susceptibility to prostate cancer revisited. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17: 1843–1848. 16. Cavanagh H, Rogers KMA. The role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in prostate, pancreatic and stomach cancers. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2015; 13: 16. 17. Plaskon LA, Penson DF, Vaughan TL, et al. Cigarette Smoking and Risk of Prostate Cancer in Middle-Aged Men 1. 2003; 12: 604–609. 18. Huncharek M, Sue Haddock K, Reid R, et al. Smoking as a risk factor for prostate cancer: A meta-analysis of 24 prospective cohort studies. Am J Public Health 2010; 100: 693–701. 19. Richie J, Catalona W, Ahmann F, et al. Effect of patient age on early detection of prostate cancer with serum prostate-spesific antigen and digital rectal examination. Urology 1993; 42: 356–74. 20. Carvalhal G, Smith D, Mager D, et al. Digital rectal examination for detecting prostate cancer at prostate specific antigen levels of 4ng/ml or less. J Urol 1999; 161: 835–9. 21. Stamey T, Yang N, Hay A, et al. Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 909–16. 22. Catalona W, Richie J, Ahmann F, et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol 1994; 151: 1283–90. 23. Lee F, Torp-Pedersen S, Siders D, et al. Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. Radiology 1989; 170: 609–15. 24. Takenaka A, Hara R, Ishimura T. A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficiency between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 11: 134–8. 25. Hara R, Jo Y, Fujii T, et al. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core -68- biopsy. Urology 2008; 71: 191–5. 26. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, et al. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol 2006; 175: 1605–12. 27. Donovan J, Handy F, Neal D, et al. Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) feasibility study. Heal Technol Assess 2003; 7: 1–88. 28. Aziz A, Hakim L, Soebadi D. Comparison of sextant and 10-core biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol Indones. 29. Monn MF, Flack CK, Koch MO. Prostate Cancer. ProstateCance2016; 551–562. 30. Shepherd D, Keetch D, Humprey P, et al. Repeat biopsy strategy in men with isolated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate needle biopsy. J Urol; 156. 31. Merrimen J, Jones G, Walker D, et al. Multifocal high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a significant risk factor for prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol 2009; 182: 485–90. 32. Stewart C, Leibovich B, Weaver A, et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol 2001; 166: 86–92. 33. Zigeuner R, Schips L, Lipsky R. Detection of prostate cancer by TURP or open surgery in patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsies. Urology; 62: 883–7. 34. Aron M, Rajeev T, Gupta N. Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate: a randomized controlled study. BJU Int; 85: 682–5. 35. Sipan G, Umbas R, Rahardjo D. Profilaksis ciprofloxacin oral dosis 1 hari versus 3 hari pada biopsi prostat transrektal dengan penuntun ultrasonografi. JURI 2004; 11: 25–30. 36. Wendy R, Safriadi R. Periprostatic block and intraprostatic infiltration on TRUS- P guiden biopsy: Effectivity and Complication. Indones J Cancer. 37. Haswir H, Umbas R. Comparison of Efficacy between oral morphine sulphate and diclofenac suppository for analgesia during Transrecrtal Ultrasound-guided Prostate biopsy. Indones J Intern Med 2008; 40: 124–127. 38. Alvarino, Umbas R. Penggunaan anestesi lokal periprostat -69- sebelum biopsi prostat transrektal. Maj Kedokt Indon 2005; 55:397–401. 39. Azis A, Djatisoesanto W, Soebadi D, et al. The difference of pain perception between ketoprofen suppository and 1% periprostatic licocain injection in transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy. J Urol Indones. 40. Ariffin A, Safriadi F. Comparison efficacy Periprostatic Nerve Block (PNB) vs. PNB Combined with 2% Lidocaine Gel for Prostate biopsy. J Urol Indones. 41. Epstein J. An update of the Gleason grading system. J Urol 2010; 183: 433–440. 42. Edge S, Byrd D, Compton C, et al. (eds). AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. Springer, 2010. 43. Spigelman S, McNeal J, Freiha F. Rectal examination in volume determination of carcinoma of the prostate clinical and anatomical correlations. J Urol 1986; 136: 1228–30. 44. Lee N, Newhouse J, Olsson C, et al. Which patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer need a computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis? An analysis based on 588 patients. Urology 1999; 54: 490–4. 45. Jager G, Severens J, Thornbury J. Prostate cancer staging: should MR imaging be used? A decision analytic approach. Radiology 2000; 215: 445–51. 46. Partin A, Mangold L, Lamm D. Contemporary update of the prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin tables) for the new millennium. Urology 2001; 58: 843–8. 47. Heidenreich A, Varga Z, Von Knobloch R. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis. J Urol 2002; 167: 1681–6. 48. McGregor B, Tulloch A, Quinlan M. The role of bone scanning in the assessment of prostatic carcinoma. Br J Urol 1978; 50: 178– 81. 49. O’Donoghue E, Constable A, Sherwood T. Bone scanning and plasma phosphatases in carcinoma of the prostate. Br J Urol 1978; 50: 172–7. 50. Wolff J, Zimny M, Borchers H. Is prostate-specific antigen a -70- reliable marker of bone metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed cancer of the prostate? Eur Urol 1998; 33: 376–81. 51. Bruwer G, Heyns C, Allen F. Influence of local tumour stage and grade on reliability of serum prostate-specific antigen in predicting skeletal metastasis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Eur Urol 1999; 35: 223–7. 52. Huggins C, Hodges C. Studies on prostatic cancer I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatase in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 2002; 167: 948–51. 53. Seidenfeld J, Samson DJ, Aronson N, et al. Relative effectiveness and cost- effectiveness of methods of androgen suppression in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 1999; i–x, 1-246, I1-36, passim. 54. Prostate Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Prostate Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Lancet (London, England) 2000; 355: 1491–8. 55. Schmitt B, Bennett C, Seidenfeld J. Maximal androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2. 56. Schmitt B, Wilt T, Schellhammer P. Combined androgen blockade with non- steroidal antiandrogens for advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review. Urology 2001; 57: 727–32. 57. Samson D, Seidenfeld J, Schmitt B. Systematic review and meta- analysis of monotherapy compared with combined androgen blockade for patients with advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2002; 95: 361–76. 58. Bruchovsky N, Rennie P, Coldman A. Effects of androgen withdrawal on the stem cell composition of the Shionogi carcinoma. Cancer Res 1990; 50: 2275–82. 59. Abrahamsson P. Potential benefits of intermittent androgen suppression therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 49–59. 60. Hussain M, Tangen C, Higano C. Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9346 (INT- 0162). Absolute prostate-specific antigen value after androgen deprivation is a strong independent predictor of survival in new metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest -71- Oncology Group Trial 9346 (INT-0162). J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 3984–90. 61. Lane T, Ansell W, Farrugia D. Long-term outcomes in patients with prostate cancer managed with intermittent androgen suppression. Urol Int 2004; 73: 117–32. 62. Mottlet N, Goussard M, Loulidi S. Intermittent versus continuous maximal androgen blockade in metastatic (D2) prostate cancer patients. A randomized trial. Eur Urol Suppl 2009; 8: 131, abstract 44. 63. Byar D. Proceedings: the Veterans Administration Co-operative Urological Research Group studies of cancer of the prostate.