Training and Development Secrets For Changing Behavior and Driving Organizational Growth
Training and Development Secrets For Changing Behavior and Driving Organizational Growth
Training and Development Secrets For Changing Behavior and Driving Organizational Growth
DEVELOPMENT SECRETS
FOR CHANGING BEHAVIOR
AND DRIVING ORGANIZATIONAL
GROWTH
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 2
That’s because these training programs do little to change participant behavior for the long run. Employees may learn
about valuable new skills through passive forms of training, but passive consumption of knowledge just doesn’t
guarantee application. That means that companies are left investing thousands of dollars—and dozens, or even
hundreds, of hours away from the desk—in training that fades from the trainees’ memories shortly after the PowerPoint
presentation is powered down.
But the right kind of training—the kind focused on behavior change—truly has the power to transform employee
morale, engagement, and workplace contribution. In this guide, you’ll learn the secrets to instituting training and
development programs that truly change employee behavior for the better and thereby contribute to
organizational growth.
Motivation: What’s the incentive or goal for performing a certain behavior, and how desirable is that incentive?
How much time, money, and physical effort will a behavior take to perform?
Does the behavior force someone to step out of his or her comfort zone or routine?
These simplicity factors determine how much ability performing a certain behavior takes. Finally, triggers can come in
three different forms:
A facilitator
A spark
A facilitator triggers A spark triggers behavior A signal triggers a behavior
A signal behavior when motivation when ability is high when both ability and
is high but ability is low. but motivation isn’t. motivation are high.
Then, teach the manager how to give quality, actionable feedback so that his or her ability to do so becomes great.
Finally, establish a trigger. For example, instruct the manager to provide feedback to an employee within 24
hours of the employee sending in a deliverable. Receiving the deliverable acts as a trigger that indicates that
a behavior is required.
Traditional training that focuses on expanding someone’s knowledge or skill set often addresses the “ability” component
of Fogg’s model—but motivations and triggers are usually absent. That means that participants are unlikely to
actually change their behaviors or apply their new skills after the training.
2. Engagement
Behavior won’t change if the training isn’t engaging. Make the training feel safe so participants will feel comfortable
to be fully involved. The facilitator must walk the fine line of learning with participants and projecting expertise
through a mastery of the material.
3. Relevance
Participants need to know how the training and skills they’re learning are relevant to their everyday reality.
Facilitators should demonstrate connections between what participants are learning and how those new skills
are applied on the job.
4. Ownership
When participants take personal ownership of their learning, and outcomes, it becomes far more powerful. Don’t
let participants blame others for a learning outcome or “coast through” the training while hiding behind others’
efforts.
5. Point of Choice
This is the turning point for participants, where they can freely choose to apply their new skills on the job. No
training program can force participants to make behavior changes. Not to mention, forced change isn’t nearly as
effective or sustainable as change instituted freely by individuals.
The Point of Choice paradigm puts the power and opportunity to change in the participant’s hands, and if the training to
this point has been effective, most participants will make the choice to change their behaviors.
REPORTING
CYCLE
company’s current reality.
Experiential learning is a training method that engages participants through an immersive, themed training event. The
event is engaging and interactive, so participants can learn by doing. Hands-on learning where participants work
through problems together requires active engagement, rather than the passive listening that’s required by traditional,
presentation-based training.
But why do experiential training events need to be themed? By masking common work scenarios with a theme,
participants are transported to another world that they don’t immediately recognize. The new environment allows them
to “let their guard down”—they’re not concerned with producing expected behaviors, because they don’t know what
behaviors are expected in this new, unfamiliar environment. Ultimately, taking participants out of their day-to-day
reality allows them to feel safe, encouraging them to take risks and learn through their mistakes. If a training scenario
exactly mirrored their on-the-job environment, failure wouldn’t feel like an option. But failure can be another powerful
learning tool!
It’s up to training facilitators and management at large to connect an employee’s investment in training to an employee’s
core workplace desires. For example, improving skills through training and then exhibiting those skills on the job will
help employees excel in their roles, ushering in rewards, recognition, and respect from colleagues and higher-ups.
Furthermore, training built around experiential learning activities, which requires participants to interact in fun and
meaningful ways with their colleagues, works to break down barriers and foster meaningful relationships among
coworkers—building camaraderie in the process. Making connections like these explicit before and during training will
build employee conviction around the value of learning.
When it becomes clear that training will affect them personally in profound ways, employees will make the personal
choice to change their behaviors based on what they learned during training.
“Convincing leadership
The key to building conviction about training in a
company’s leadership team is to tie development
initiatives to organizational goals. Behavior change
training shouldn’t be viewed as “feel good” profes- that a major investment
sional development—it’s a strategic decision that
profoundly impacts the company’s bottom line.
in the kind of training
Training improves productivity, and productivity
that sparks behavior
increases profits. A study by the National Center on
the Educational Quality of the Workforce5 revealed
change can be tough.
that increasing education levels at workplaces by 10
percent resulted in productivity gains of nearly nine
To a leadership team,
percent. Compare that to similar cost investments in more training means
supplies and equipment that resulted in only a 3.4
percent gain in productivity levels—that’s less than more money and time
spent out of the office.
half the productivity gains brought about through
learning.
Training has been linked more directly to increased How does that help the
profits as well. According to the American Society
for Training & Development (ATD)6, companies that company?”
invest more in training see significantly higher sales
and a larger profit per employee. ATD’s study
revealed that companies that invested the most
resources in training saw a whopping 57 percent
increase in sales, and companies with the best
performance reported that they trained 86 percent
of their employees.
The lesson from these numbers? If your company’s organizational goals include increasing productivity and profits, then
investing in development initiatives that spark behavior change is practically a no-brainer. Think of it as a chain reaction:
investments in stellar training and development initiatives result in a workforce that’s more engaged and productive,
which results in a company with more profits, which, in turn, results in the opportunity to reinvest in organizational
growth strategies. It’s clear that behavior change through training is the building block for this kind of organizational
success.
Sources
1. Fogg, BJ. “BJ Fogg’s Behavior Model.” www.BehaviorModel.org. 2015. Web. 12 Aug. 2016. In-Line Citation: (Fogg)
2. Kohn, Art. “Brain Science: Overcoming the Forgetting Curve.” http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/1400/brain-science-overcoming-the-forgetting-curve. Learning Solutions Magazine,
27 May 2015. Web. 12 Aug. 2016.
3. “A visual guide to experiential learning for organizational development.” http://www.eaglesflight.com/blog/a-visual-guide-to-experiential-learning-for-organizational-development. Eagle’s Flight,
n.d. Web. 12 Aug. 2016.
4. Sirota, David, Louis A. Mischkind, and Michael Irwin Meltzer. “Why your employees are losing motivation.” http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/5289.html. HBS Working Knowledge, 4 Oct. 2006. Web. 12
Aug. 2016.
5. “The Other Shoe: Education’s Contribution to the Productivity of Establishments.” http://www.thelearningalliance.info/Docs/Jun2003/DOC-2003Jun25.1056542378.pdf. National Center on the
Educational Quality of the Workforce, n.d. Web. 12 Aug. 2016.
6. Warkenthien, Jack. “Research shows that training employees pays off with profits.” http://www.bizjournals.com/memphis/stories/2002/01/07/focus5.html. Memphis Business Journal, 06 Jan.
2002. Web. 12 Aug. 2016.
7. Olivero, Gerald, Denise K. Bane, and Richard E. Kopelman. “Executive Coaching as a Transfer of Training Tool: Effects on Productivity in a Public Agency.” Public Personnel Management 26.4
(1997): 461–469. Web. 12 Aug. 2016.