Chapter 4.0-1
Chapter 4.0-1
November, 2018
CHAPTER FOUR
CLASSICAL
ECONOMIC THOUGHT
INTRODUCTION
ADAM SMITH
DAVID RICARDO
The last quarter of the 18th century was characterized by full of new
events. Some important changes took place in the world. It was the new
era in economic and political organizations.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 4
It was a period of:
The Beginning of the Industrial Revolution.
Adam Smith
David Ricardo
Jermy Bentham
J. Mill
Adam Smith was the first academic economist with much higher
degree of systematic thinking, who was able to achieve much as
compared with those who preceded him.
1. Immediate Predecessors
2. C l u b s a n d T r a v e l s
Inspite of the fact that Smith owed a debt to his predecessors, the
important of his own contributions cannot be minimized. He collected
ideas that were lying scattered, wove them together, gave them a shape,
and thus enhanced their significance. His work, thus, created a
revolution in the domain of economic thinking.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 12
CONTRIBUTION OF ADAM SMITH
A n a l y s i s o f t h e We a l t h o f N a t i o n s
Adam Smith`s thought regarding the origin of wealth was different from
Mercantilist and Physiocrats. To M e r c a n t i l i s t s wealth comes from
the accumulation of precious metals. To P h y s i o c r a t s wealth
originated from a g r i c u l t u r e .
Capital
Public finance.
G ove r n m e n t I n t e r ve n t i o n
maintained by individuals
1. D iv i s i o n o f L ab o r
Although the idea of division of labor is not new, the statement given by
Adam Smith is a real contribution to economic science.
To him labor is the source of the wealth of nations- not all human exertion ,
but only productive labor.
A. I m p r o v e m e n t i n s k i l l
B. S a v i n g o f t i m e
When a bigger job is broken down into smaller ones, workers are able to do their
part properly and look for better ways of doing things i.e., division of labor
stimulate invention of machinery due to specialization.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 19
Smith also pointed out the disadvantages of division of labor. Thus, he said
division of labor caused mental stagnation. Furthermore, specialization
decreased mobility of labor also.
Adam Smith also states about the limit to division of labor. In this regard,
he pointed out that division of labor was limited by the following factors:
He held that the industry will itself depends up on the extent of the market
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 20
2. T h e o r y o f Va l u e
R i c h a r d C a n t i l l o n was the founder of the Classical theory of value.
He clearly stated that the v a l u e o f t h e c o m m o d i t y was
dependent on the quantity and quality land and labor entering into its
production. He also said that market price of a commodity was
determined by the supply and demand.
Some of the most useful commodities such as air and water have scarcely
any value in exchange while others such as diamonds although of little use
can command a great deal of other commodities in exchange.
Smith did not solve the paradox of value. This had to await later economists who
clearly saw the distinction between a good’s total utility and its marginal utility.
Smith argued that in a society in which labor was the only resource (i.e., in a
primitive society), the relative value of a good (its exchange value) would
be determined by the amount of labor necessary to produce it.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 22
In other words he considered the value of a commodity be determined by
the cost of producing or the amount/quantity of labor necessary for
the production of the commodity.
costs, including a normal profit. Any increase in demand will not increase
value because the costs of producing each unit of the commodity remain
unchanged.
principle becomes untenable. If the demand for the product rises, and if as
the industry expands it produces the good at higher costs, then the long-run
If rising output results in falling costs per unit, then an increase in demand
Adam Smith stated that demand for labor depended upon the wealth of
the nation while its supply was determined by the average price of
provisions. The implication of this is that in a ‘stationary economy’,
laborers multiplied beyond their employment opportunities (the
increasing population), hence the wage level gradually comes down to
its subsistence level.
Monopoly
Different fertility and location of land, and
Smith assumes that land is a private property and that with the
progress of the society and an increase with population, the
demand for agricultural produce keeps on increasing.
The landlords have the capacity to withhold supply of land unless they are
paid rent for their land. This rent is not in any way related to the efforts
undertaken by the landowners. This also reflects that land is any free gift
of nature in which no contribution of human effort is involved.
In this regard, Smith pointed out that rent diminished if the land was
distant from the market.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 28
5. N a t u r a l a n d M a r k e t P r i c e
Smith also distinguished between Natural and Market Price.
A. Natural Price
It is that price of the commodity which covers the natural rate of profit,
wages and rent. Thus, the concept of natural price is essentially “the cost
of production” theory of value.
B. Market Price
Opposed to the natural price is the market price, which is determined by the
forces of demand and supply through the competition among buyers
and sellers, and around this natural price the market price oscillates.
If the labor employment was only meant to add to the consumption of the
employer then such a labor was termed to be u n p r o d u c t i v e l a b o r .
The labor of a menial servant, on the contrary adds to the value of nothing.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 31
In Smith's approach, we have three definitions of productive labor:
A. Circulating Capital:
Is characterized by its changing ownership and periodic turnover.
B. Fixed Capital:
Is a type of capital which is used for production without changing masters,
or without circulating any further. Mostly, physical capital is termed to be
fixed capital for the difficulty of its liquidity.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 33
Regarding s a v i n g , Smith said that it is very important for capital
accumulation of a nation. National savings might be increased either
through a shift from consumption into savings, or through diversion of
additional national income into savings.
If supply of capital increases faster than the demand, there is a fall in the
rate of interest thereby the rate of profit falls as well.
1. Defense expenditure
2. Expense of justice
Adam Smith did not agree with the Physiocrats that taxes should entirely fall
upon the rent of land (i.e., on the land lords). To him every tax must
ultimately be paid out of the three revenues of society: R e n t , P r o f i t s
a n d Wa g e s .
♥ Equality ♥ Convenience
♥ Certainty ♥ Economy
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 36
A. The Maxim of Equality/Ability:
important canon of taxation. By equality it does not mean that all tax payers
Rather by equality it means equality of sacrifice, i.e., people should pay taxes
in proportion to their incomes.
In this canon of taxation Adam Smith said that “Every tax ought to be
It means every tax should be levied in such a manner and a time which is
For example in an agricultural country, tax should be collected only after the
harvesting has been done. More, a tax payable by a school teacher should be
Adam Smith further said “The tax which each individual has to pay ought
how much tax he has to pay, to whom and by what time the tax is to be
paid. The place and other procedural information should also be clear.
For Smith, it would protect the tax payer from the exploitation of tax authorities
in any way. It will enable the tax payer to manage his income and expenditure.
Those taxes which are expensive and difficult to collect should be avoided.
take out and keep out of pockets of the people as little as possible over
According to Smith Public debts are the result of two contributory factors:
1. The need of the state to keep the national welfare whether during
For Smith public debt is not good for the state because it shifts the
employment of capital from productive uses into unproductive one.
Adam Smith was the founder of economics of science and the father
of political economy.
ever produced by Adam Smith. It was really a great book, without it the
Adam Smith through his book not only influenced his own generation
Thus, his place in economics cannot be challenged and has not yet been
challenged by anyone.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 43
DAVID RIC ARD O
D av i d R i c a r d o ( 1 7 7 2 – 1 8 2 3 )
L i f e H i s t o r y a n d Wo r k s
David Ricardo was born in London, England.
He has been regarded as the greatest economist of all times. In his hands
Classical English political economy reaches its final and complete form.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 46
Formerly, he was interested in the study of Mathematics, Chemistry, and
Biology; but when he studied the ‘Wealth of Nations’ in 1779, his
attention was wholly diverted to political economy.
Ricardo had very little formal education till the age of 12 when he was
sent to Holland for two years for commercial education. Ricardo entered in
to business and began working with his father at the age of 14.
Finally, Ricardo died when he was fifty-one from an ear infection. At the
time of his death his fortune was estimated at about £ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 .
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 47
Although A d a m S m i th was the founder of the English classical
school and set its dominant tone, D a v i d R i c a r d o was the leading
figure in further developing the ideas of this school.
Ricardo was responsible for giving rise to many other school of thought
in economics viz: Historical School, Austrian School, and Marxian School.
David Ricardo like his forerunners was also affected by several multi-
dimensional factors prevailing at that time in England which shaped his
economic ideas. Most of the factors were related to the intellectual and
environmental influences of that period which are as follows:
3. Ricardo also read many other writers works of his time, like Malthus,
J. B Say, Edward West and so on to whom he had acknowledged his
indebtedness and had expressed his gratitude in his book. From Malthus,
he got raw material, especially on population and rent. From J. B Say the
law of market.
1. T h e o r y o f Va l u e
♦ The theory of value has been one of the most controversial subject in the
domain of economic theory.
♦ Ricardo was concerned with relative values, not with absolute value.
♦ According to David Ricardo natural value is stable while the market value
is variable which turns about natural value and ultimately tends to equalize
with it in the long run.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 51
In his ‘Principles of Political Economy and Taxation’ , Ricardo wrote that for a
commodity to have exchange value, it must have use value. Utility is not the
measure of exchangeable value, although it is essential to it.
Ricardo did not give much attention for these commodities in his theory of
value since these are so limited in number. He paid much attention for
common commodities, and regarding these he said that most commodities
are reproducible/common commodities and Ricardo assumed that they
are produced without restraint under conditions of competition.
of capital will incur loss, thus capital flows out of the industry . This
then profits rise and more capital is used to produce the commodity.
Hence the market price decrease and tends to bring in accord with
He said in the long run wages tend to equal the exchange value of food and
the rates of exchange are equalized by competition.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 55
3. T h e o r y o f Wa g e s
In this regard he stated that if the price of food and other necessaries
increase, the natural price of labor will increase and vice versa.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 56
To him the ‘ M a r k e t P r i c e o f L a b o r ’ mean price which is really
paid for it. It is determined by the forces of demand and supply. But
the market price tends to fluctuate around the natural price.
NB. The long-run tendency is, therefore for workers to receive the
subsistence minimum wage.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 58
4. T h e o r y o f R e n t
David Ricardo propounded his theory of rent on the basis of the idea of
Adam Smith and Thomas Robert Malthus.
Moreover, Adam Smith remarked: the rent of land not only varies with its
f e r t i l i t y whatever be its produce but with its s i t u a t i o n s , whatever
be its fertility.”
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 59
The P h y s i o c r a t s regarded “ R e n t ” as the free gift of nature that was
likely to increase the national wealth. But like Adam Smith, they did not try
to determine the amount of rent to be paid to landlords of different
categories.
According to Ricardo the land which was cultivated first in every country
was the most fertile and favorably situated.
Ricardo believed that so long as the most fertile land was available, the
question of rent would not arise. And he said that less fertile land was
cultivated only when the population of the country increases.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 60
In this regard he said that as population increases, demand for food
became acute and this leads people to start cultivation on less fertile
Ricardo said that if successive units of labor and capital are added to a piece
of land while technology remains constant, each added unit of investment
will add less to the output than previous units.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 62
In general, according to David Ricardo, rent arises at both the extensive and
intensive margins of cultivation.
He said if the first grade land produced 6 quintals of grains and the second
grade land produce 5 quintals of grains, the difference i.e. one quintals of
gain would be the rent, the second grade land being the marginal land which
population, and it yielded only 4 quintals of grains, then rent would be as follow:
If on further pressure, the fourth grade land was cultivated which yielded 3
quintals of grain only, the rent would accrue on the first three plots of land
As population and the demand for food increase less fertile lands have the
tendency to be put for cultivation. Consequently the society will face both
fertile and non-fertile land.
The price of the produce on non-fertile land must be high enough to cover
the highest cost of production. In a competitive environment production
with higher level of price in the market will not have any demand.
Hence no producer has the tendency to look for non-fertile lands. As the
result rent is absent on non-fertile land. To conclude: the differential
refers to the surplus generated from the land for being fertile.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 65
Criticisms of his ‘Theory of Rent’
It does not appear sound to treat capital and labor as a single homogeneous factor.
Ricardo did not connect rent with any particular quantity of land. It is the capital
and labor applied to land which yields rent.
His assumption that best lands are cultivated first is not supported by any
NB: The scarcity principle explains why rent arises and the differential principle
But Ricardo does not accept this view. He tries to show that accumulation of
capital would leads to the reduction of profits, not always, but under certain
conditions/circumstances. The accumulation of capital will lead to reduction
of profits if it is accompanied by rising wages.
Low prices will stimulate exports and ultimately the money which was
sent abroad will come back. Consequently, price would rise, export will
be curtailed and imports will increase, thus leading to the export of
money. The cycle will go on.
For Adam Smith trade between two countries will occur if and only if each
country has an absolute cost advantage over the other in one commodity.
Unlike to Smith, Ricardo shows that even if one country is more efficient
than another in producing all commodities, trade between the two
nevertheless can be of mutual benefit/advantageous.
Table 2: Hours of Labor Necessary to Produce One Unit of Wine and Cloth
(80 + 90) of labor to produce one unit of Wine and Cloth each.
But after trade, Portugal produces 2 units of Wine in 1 6 0 (80 + 80) labor hours
and England Produces 2 units of cloth in 2 0 0 (100 + 100) hours of labor.
The total number of hours of labor required by both countries before trade was
3 9 0 which reduced to 3 6 0 after trade, a reduction of 3 0 hours of labor.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 74
Comparative cost theory does not tell us what the actual terms of trade
will be. Rather it gives us upper and lower limits of the range in which trade
between the two countries will be mutually beneficial.
If Portuguese Wine is exchanged for English Cloth at the rate of 1 wine = 0.89
cloth, then all the gains of the trade will go to England. If Portuguese Wine
is exchanged for English Cloth at the rate of 1 Wine = 1.2 Cloth, then all the
gains of the trade will go to Portuguese.
Ricardo did not specify clearly how the gains would get divided between
England and Portugal. Although his theory defines the limits within which
the ratios of exchange between internationally traded commodities could
fluctuate, it does not attempt to explain what determines the ratios. It was
J o h n S t u a r t M i l l (Chapter 6) later presented a theory of reciprocal
demand that addressed this question.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 75
CONCLUSION
David Ricardo was considered as a great economist next to Adam Smith.
He succeeded even more than Adam Smith in isolating the chief categories of
the economic system. He left his successors many unsolved problems, but he
also indicated ways in which they might be solved.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 76
Ricardo’s writings fascinated a number of early socialists in the 1820s, who
thought his value theory had radical implications. Hence it is concluded that
Above all, Ricardo was responsible for giving rise to many schools of thought
in economics; viz, Historical School, Austrian School, and the Marxian School.
Although some of his analysis were weak or inaccurate in several respects, all
wealthiest and the strongest countries were often the most populous.
to economic development.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 81
Malthus’s view on population
Although Malthus was known for his essay on population, he was not
the first to lay bare the danger of over population. In fact he was
not even the originator of the idea that population tends to
increase at a faster rate than the means of subsistence.
The first edition of the book was published in 1798, contained 396 pages.
This book had 7 editions: 1803, 1806, 1807, 1817, 1826, and 1872.
growth in America (the India of its day) for proof of his propositions.
In his opinion, Malthus said that the population can exist only in
proportion to the available food supply. If the population in the country
continues to increase without restriction, soon it will reach the point it will
be just more than the means of subsistence.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 83
In general Malthus has summarized his doctrines in to three prepositions.
3. The checks which repress the superior power of population keep its effects.
2. Positive Checks
1. Preventive Checks:
He also called it man made checks.
Others
B. A r t i f i c i a l R e s t r a i n t s (Vices):
Includes the acts of sexual intercourses that do not result in pregnancy includes:
Professional prostitution
Promiscuous intercourse
Wars
Famine
In his opinion, the preventive checks were better than the positive checks to
control the population. Since positive checks are harder/horrible and causes of
miseries, Thus, Thomas Robert Malthus suggested adoption of preventive
checks: like self-restraints, late marriage, and celibacy.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 87
Malthus said self-restraint and celibacy were the better measure to control
the number of births, and he badly criticized the artificial and unnatural
modes of checking population like sex fraud, use of contraceptives and free
people who had not practiced moral restraint i.e., for the failure by the “lower
the poor. Because for him to give them aid would cause more children to
advocated that the state should not recognize the right of the poor to
who married at 21, had eight children and twenty-five grandchildren. Had this
warned the people against the rapidly increasing population which was
In this regard, Malthus was badly criticized. The main criticisms of the
Malthus has tried to prove that the population doubles itself every 25
years. This condition is not correct. More, the concept that population
ratio was wrong. He did not visualize the impact of technical innovations,
production.
products but also vegetables and meat that have been ignored by Malthus
many times more than the population on woman, it was therefore, wrong
Malthus was also wrong not to differentiate between the desire of sex and
the desire of children. The desire to have sex is natural desire and is found
in every man, but the desire of children is related with social and religious
desires. Man can not have control over the desire to have sex, but the desire
however, we must also emphasize that Malthus’s population theory still has
On Rent
His views on rent are contained in book entitled “An Enquiry in to the
Nature and Progress of Rent”, in 1815.
He stated that the cause of high prices of food was the population
growth and progress. The growth of population leads to the scarcity of
good land. The scarcity of good land is a cause of scarcity of food.
Prices of the produce raised from the already cultivated land increases- an
application of the law of diminishing returns.
December 6, 2018 By: Michael T. 94
He said that since rent arises due to the difference between the price
and cost of production, the rise in price was the sole cause for the
origin of rent.
Reading Assignment