5.5 Usm
5.5 Usm
Dr. Venkaiah N
6
USM
Setup
Main
elements:
• Magnetostrictor
or
Piezoelectric
transducer
• Concentrator
• Tool
• Slurry
feeding
arrangement
7
Magnetostrictor
• Has
a
high-‐frequency
winding
• Magnetostric=on
effect:
Ferromagne=c
materials
change
their
shape
or
d i m e n s i o n s
d u r i n g
magne=za=on.
• M a g n e t o s t r i c = v e
materials
can
convert
magne=c
energy
into
kine=c
energy,
or
the
reverse,
and
are
used
to
b u i l d
a c t u a t o r s
a n d
8
sensors.
Mechanical
Amplifier
• The
elonga=on
obtained
at
the
resonance
frequency
(fr)
using
a
magnetostrictor
of
length l =
0.5
λ
is
usually
0.001
to
0.1
μm.
• This
is
too
small
for
prac=cal
machining
applica=ons.
• Amplitude
is
increased
by
fiMng
an
amplifier
(acous=c
horn)
into
the
output
end
of
the
magnetostrictor.
• Larger
amplitudes,
typically
40
to
50
μm,
are
found
to
be
suitable
for
prac=cal
applica=ons.
• Depending
on
the
final
amplitude
required,
the
amplitude
amplifica=on
can
be
achieved
by
one
or
more
acous=c
horns.
9
Tools
• Tool
=ps
must
have
Ø high
wear
resistance
Ø High
fa=gue
strength
• Copper
and
chromium
silver
steel
tools
à
for
machining
glass
and
tungsten
carbide
• Silver
and
chromium
nickel
steel
à
for
machining
sintered
carbides
• Tool
feed
mechanisms:
– Pneuma=c
– Periodic
switching
of
a
stepping
motor
or
solenoid
– Compact
spring-‐loaded
system
– Counterweight
techniques.
10
Abrasive
Slurry
• The
abrasive
slurry
is
con=nuously
fed
into
the
machining
zone
to
ensure
efficient
flushing
of
debris
and
keep
the
machining
area
cool.
• Slurry
composi=on:
50
vol.
%
of
fine
abrasive
grains
(of
Grit
No.
100-‐800)
and
50
vol.
%
of
water.
• Abrasives:
Boron
carbide
(B 4 C),
Aluminum
oxide
(Al2O3)
or
Silicon
carbide
(SiC)
• The
slurry
is
pumped
at
a
rate
of
25
L/min.
• As
machining
progresses,
the
slurry
becomes
less
effec=ve
as
the
par=cles
wear
and
break
down.
• The
expected
life
ranges
from
150
to
200
h
of
ultrasonic
exposure
11
Mechanism
of
Material
Removal
v Material
removal
mechanism
of
USM
involves
three
dis=nct
ac=ons:
1. Mechanical
abrasion
by
localized
direct
hammering
of
the
abrasive
grains
stuck
between
the
vibra=ng
tool
and
adjacent
work
surface.
2. The
micro-‐chipping
by
free
impacts
of
par=cles
that
fly
across
the
machining
gap
and
strike
the
workpiece
at
random
loca=ons.
3. The
work
surface
erosion
by
cavita=on
in
the
slurry
stream.
12
Mechanism
of
Material
Removal
…
• Dominant
mechanism
à
direct
hammering
• Contribu=on
of
cavita=on
effect
à
<
5
%
of
the
total
material
removed
15
MRR
…
Amplitude
&
Frequency
of
tool
vibra7on:
• Amplitude
of
the
tool
oscilla=on
has
the
greatest
effect
of
all
the
process
variables.
• Higher
tool
vibra=on
amplitude
à
higher
kine=c
energy
à
enhanced
mechanical
chipping
ac=on
à
higher
MRR
• A
very
high
vibra=on
amplitude
may
lead
to
the
occurrence
of
splashing,
which
causes
a
reduc=on
of
the
number
of
ac=ve
abrasive
grains
and
results
in
a
decrease
in
the
MRR.
• Higher
the
vibra=on
frequency
à
lesser
the
chipping
=me
for
each
grain
à
lower
chipping
ac=on
à
lower
the
MRR
• Higher
the
feed
force
à
greater
the
chipping
forces
by
each
grain
à
higher
the
MRR
16
MRR
…
2.
Abrasives
• Both
the
grain
size
and
the
vibra=on
amplitude
have
a
similar
effect
on
the
removal
rate.
• MRR
rises
un=l
the
grain
sizes
reach
the
vibra=on
amplitude,
at
that
stage,
the
MRR
decreases
• Grain
size
>
vibra=on
amplitude
à
difficulty
of
abrasive
renewal
• B4C
à
higher
hardness
à
higher
removal
rates
than
silicon
carbide
(SiC)
when
machining
glass
17
MRR
…
• Carrying
liquid:
Ø Water
is
commonly
used
Ø Benzene,
glycerol,
and
oils
are
other
alterna=ves
• Low
slurry
viscosity
à
beTer
flow
of
slurry
à
enhanced
MRR
• Volumetric
concentra=on
of
abrasives:
30
to
35
%
• A
change
of
concentra=on
occurs
during
machining
as
a
result
of
the
abrasive
dust
seTling.
• The
actual
concentra=on
should,
therefore,
be
checked
at
certain
=me
intervals.
18
MRR
…
3.
Workpiece
Impact
Hardness
• MRR
is
affected
by
the
ra=o
of
tool
hardness
to
workpiece
hardness.
• Higher
the
ra=o
à
Lower
will
be
MRR
(If
tool
hardness
increases,
abrasives
loose
their
sharpness
and
therefore,
MRR
decreases)
• Sok
and
tough
tool
materials
are
used
4.
Tool
Shape:
Larger
tool
area
à
inadequate
distribu=on
of
abrasive
slurry
over
the
en=re
area
à
lower
machining
rate
5.
Sta7c
Pressure:
• Lower
than
the
op=mum
à
lower
force
on
the
grain
to
press
into
work
material
à
low
MRR
6.
Hole
depth:
Deeper
the
hole,
lower
will
be
the
MRR
• Reason:
deeper
the
tool
reaches,
the
more
difficult
and
slower
is
the
exchange
of
abrasives
from
underneath
the
tool.
19
MRR
…
20
Surface
Quality
• Rela=onship
among
grit
number,
grit
size
and
roughness
• Larger
the
grit
number
(smaller
grain
size),
the
surface
will
be
smooth.
• Larger
the
grit
size,
faster
the
cuMng
rate
but
surface
finish
is
poor.
• However,
other
factors
such
as
tool
surface,
amplitude
of
tool
vibra=on,
and
material
being
machined
also
affect
the
surface
finish.
21
Surface
Quality
…
• Higher
amplitude
à
deeper
grain
penetra=ons
into
the
workpiece
surface
à
deeper
craters
à
rough
surface
• Sidewalls
are
scratched
by
abrasive
grains
à
roughness
of
sidewalls
is
larger
than
those
on
the
boTom
22
Accuracy
Accuracy
is
measured
using
– Oversize,
– Conicity,
and
– Roundness
23
Oversize
(Overcut)
• Overcut
=
Hole
diameter
(measured
at
the
top
surface)
–
tool
diameter
• Side
gap
between
tool
and
hole
is
necessary
to
enable
abrasive
flow.
• Grain
size
of
the
abrasives
affects
the
overcut
produced
• Overcut
>
3
=mes
mean
grain
size
• Magnitude
of
overcut
also
depends
on
many
other
process
parameters
(type
of
workpiece
material
and
the
method
of
tool
feed).
• Accuracy
levels
are
limited
to
+
50
μm
24
Conicity
(non-‐parallel
sides)
• Cumula=ve
abrasion
effect
of
fresh
and
sharp
grains
à
greater
overcut
at
the
entry
side
than
at
the
exit
• Example:
Ø While
drilling
a
hole
of
20
mm
size,
and
a
depth
of
10
mm
in
graphite
à
Conicity
=
~
0.2o
• The
conicity
may
be
reduced
by
– Use
of
wear-‐resistant
tool
materials
– Use
of
an
undersized
tool
in
the
first
cut
and
a
final
tool
of
the
required
size,
which
will
cut
faster
and
reduce
the
conicity
– Use
of
tools
having
nega=vely
tapered
walls
25
Roundness
Error
• Roundness
error
arises
by
the
lateral
vibra=ons
of
the
tool
• Such
vibra=ons
are
due
to
out
of
perpendicularity
of
tool
face
and
center
line
• Typical values:
26
USM
Variants
1. Rotary Ultrasonic Machining (RUM)
27
Rotary
Ultrasonic
Machining
(RUM)
• Tool
is
rotated
similar
to
conven=onal
drilling
• Deep
holes
require
longer
=me
as
the
rate
of
machining
decreases
with
the
depth
of
penetra=on.
This
is
due
to
the
difficulty
in
maintaining
a
con=nuous
supply
of
new
slurry
at
the
tool
face.
• Rota=on
of
tool
enables:
Ø High
removal
rates,
lower
tool
pressures
for
delicate
parts
Ø Improved
deep
hole
drilling
• Depth-‐to-‐diameter
ra=o
of
2.5
is
achievable
by
RUM
28
Ultrasonic
sinking
and
contour
machining
(contour
USM)
Silicon
nitride
turbine
blades
(sinking)
30
Ultrasonic
Polishing
• Fine
abrasive
par=cles
abrade
the
high
spots
of
the
workpiece
surface
• BriTle
tool
material
(graphite
or
glass)
is
used
• Removes
12
μm
of
material
or
less
• Surface
roughness:
0.3
μm
Fig. Ultrasonic polishing done for 2 min to remove the machining marks left by
a CNC engraving operation.
31
Micro-‐Ultrasonic
Machining
(MUSM)
• U=lizes
workpiece
vibra=on
• Vibra=ng
the
workpiece
allows
flexibility
in
tool
system
design
as
it
does
not
include
the
set
of
transducer,
horn,
and
cone.
• In
addi=on,
the
complete
system
is
much
more
simple
and
compact
than
conven=onal
USM.
• Micro-‐holes
of
5
μm
diameter
on
quartz,
glass,
and
silicon
have
been
produced
using
tungsten
carbide
(WC)
alloy
micro-‐
tools
• Can
machine
3-‐D
shapes
32
MUSM - Concept
Micro-‐ultrasonic
machining
33
Advantages
of
USM
• CuMng
forces
are
low
à
induced
stresses
are
too
less
à
hence
no
structural
changes
36