100% found this document useful (1 vote)
54 views36 pages

5.5 Usm

Ultrasonic machining (USM) is a non-traditional machining process that uses abrasive particles suspended in a liquid slurry and high-frequency ultrasonic vibrations to erode material from a workpiece. In USM, a tool vibrates at ultrasonic frequencies against the workpiece while abrasive slurry is circulated between them. This causes the abrasive particles to repeatedly impact the workpiece, removing small amounts of material and replicating the shape of the tool. USM can machine hard and brittle materials like glass and ceramics without affecting their properties. The rate of material removal depends on factors like the amplitude and frequency of tool vibration, static pressure, abrasive material, and

Uploaded by

Ashish Mishra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
54 views36 pages

5.5 Usm

Ultrasonic machining (USM) is a non-traditional machining process that uses abrasive particles suspended in a liquid slurry and high-frequency ultrasonic vibrations to erode material from a workpiece. In USM, a tool vibrates at ultrasonic frequencies against the workpiece while abrasive slurry is circulated between them. This causes the abrasive particles to repeatedly impact the workpiece, removing small amounts of material and replicating the shape of the tool. USM can machine hard and brittle materials like glass and ceramics without affecting their properties. The rate of material removal depends on factors like the amplitude and frequency of tool vibration, static pressure, abrasive material, and

Uploaded by

Ashish Mishra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
You are on page 1/ 36

Ultrasonic Machining (USM)

Dr. Venkaiah N

“Everything in your life is a reflection of a choice you have made. If


you want a different result, make different choices.”
- Anonymous
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this lecture, student should be able to

v  Explain working of USM

v  Explain functions of the components of USM process

v  Explain mechanism of material removal

v  Explain the effect of process parameters on responses

v  List and explain the USM variants

v  List merits, demerits and applications of USM


USM  –  Working  
•  Grit  loaded  slurry  is  circulated  between  the  tool  and  the  workpiece  
•  Vibra=ons   of   small   amplitude   (10–20   μm)   and   high   frequency   (20–40  
kHz)  are  given  to  the  tool.  
•  Hard   abrasives   in   the   slurry   are   accelerated   towards   the   workpiece  
surface  by  the  oscilla=ng  ac=on  of  the  tool.  
•  Tool   is   fed   toward  
and   held   against  
the   workpiece   by  
means   of   a   sta=c  
pressure   that   has  
to   overcome   the  
cuMng   resistance  
at   the   interface   of  
t h e   t o o l   a n d  
workpiece.  
3
USM  –  Working  …  
•  CuMng   is   performed   by   the   abrading   ac=on   of   the   abrasive  
par=cles  
•  Replica  of  the  tool  shape  will  be  obtained  on  the  workpiece  
•  Material  is  removal  in  the  form  of  fine  grains.  
•  Shape   and   dimensional   accuracy   are   directly   dependent   on  
the  tool.    
•  Which  materials  can  be  machined?  à  BriTle  materials    (glass,  
ceramics  and  diamond)  
•  Intricate  shapes  can  be  cut  easily  
•  No   change   in   the   chemical,   physical   or   metallurgical  
proper=es  of  the  workpiece  
4
USM  –  Video  

Glass Drilling by USM


5
Block  Diagram  of  USM  

6
USM  Setup  
Main  elements:  
•  Magnetostrictor  
or   Piezoelectric  
transducer  

•  Concentrator  

•  Tool  

•  Slurry   feeding  
arrangement   7
Magnetostrictor  
•  Has   a   high-­‐frequency  
winding  
•  Magnetostric=on   effect:  
Ferromagne=c   materials  
change   their   shape   or  
d i m e n s i o n s   d u r i n g  
magne=za=on.  
•  M a g n e t o s t r i c = v e  
materials   can   convert  
magne=c   energy   into  
kine=c   energy,   or   the  
reverse,   and   are   used   to  
b u i l d   a c t u a t o r s   a n d  
8
sensors.  
Mechanical  Amplifier  
•  The  elonga=on  obtained  at  the  resonance  
frequency  (fr)  using  a  magnetostrictor  of  
length l =  0.5  λ  is  usually  0.001  to  0.1  μm.  
•  This  is  too  small  for  prac=cal  machining  
applica=ons.    
•  Amplitude  is  increased  by  fiMng  an  
amplifier  (acous=c  horn)  into  the  output  
end  of  the  magnetostrictor.  
•  Larger  amplitudes,  typically  40  to  50  μm,  
are  found  to  be  suitable  for  prac=cal  
applica=ons.  
•  Depending  on  the  final  amplitude  required,  
the  amplitude  amplifica=on  can  be  
achieved  by  one  or  more  acous=c  horns.   9
Tools  
•  Tool  =ps  must  have    
Ø  high  wear  resistance  
Ø  High  fa=gue  strength  
•  Copper   and   chromium   silver   steel   tools   à   for   machining  
glass  and  tungsten  carbide  
•  Silver   and   chromium   nickel   steel   à   for   machining   sintered  
carbides  
•  Tool  feed  mechanisms:  
–  Pneuma=c  
–  Periodic  switching  of  a  stepping  motor  or  solenoid  
–  Compact  spring-­‐loaded  system  
–  Counterweight  techniques.  
10
Abrasive  Slurry  
•  The   abrasive   slurry   is   con=nuously   fed  
into   the   machining   zone   to   ensure  
efficient   flushing   of   debris   and   keep  
the  machining  area  cool.  
•  Slurry   composi=on:   50   vol.   %   of   fine  
abrasive   grains   (of   Grit   No.   100-­‐800)  
and  50  vol.  %  of  water.  
•  Abrasives:   Boron   carbide   (B 4 C),  
Aluminum   oxide   (Al2O3)   or   Silicon  
carbide  (SiC)  
•  The  slurry  is  pumped  at  a  rate  of  25  L/min.  
•  As   machining   progresses,   the   slurry   becomes   less   effec=ve   as   the   par=cles  
wear  and  break  down.  
•  The  expected  life  ranges  from  150  to  200  h  of  ultrasonic  exposure  
11
Mechanism  of  Material  Removal  

v  Material  removal  mechanism  of  USM  involves  three  dis=nct  ac=ons:  
1.  Mechanical  abrasion  by  localized  direct  hammering  of  the  abrasive  grains  
stuck  between  the  vibra=ng  tool  and  adjacent  work  surface.  
2.  The   micro-­‐chipping   by   free   impacts   of   par=cles   that   fly   across   the  
machining  gap  and  strike  the  workpiece  at  random  loca=ons.  
3.  The  work  surface  erosion  by  cavita=on  in  the  slurry  stream.  
12
Mechanism  of  Material  Removal  …  
•  Dominant  mechanism    à  direct  hammering  

•  Contribu=on  of  cavita=on  effect  à  <  5  %  of  the  total  material  
removed  

•  Sok   and   elas=c   work   materials   like   mild   steel   à   plas=cally  


deformed  first  and  are  later  removed  at  a  lower  rate  

•  Hard   and   briTle   materials   such   as   glass   à   machining   rate   is  


high  and  the  role  played  by  free  impact  can  also  be  no=ced  

•  Porous  materials  such  as  graphite  à  Erosion   13


Chipping  Rate  
MRR  
•  Factors  affec=ng  MRR:  
Ø  Amplitude  &  Frequency  of  tool  vibra=on,    
Ø  Sta=c  pressure,    
Ø  Machined  area,    
Ø  Abrasive  material  and    
Ø  Workpiece  material  

15
MRR  …  
Amplitude  &  Frequency  of  tool  vibra7on:  
•  Amplitude   of   the   tool   oscilla=on   has   the   greatest   effect   of   all  
the  process  variables.  
•  Higher   tool   vibra=on   amplitude   à   higher   kine=c   energy   à  
enhanced  mechanical  chipping  ac=on  à  higher  MRR  
•  A  very  high  vibra=on  amplitude  may  lead  to  the  occurrence  
of   splashing,   which   causes   a   reduc=on   of   the   number   of  
ac=ve  abrasive  grains  and  results  in  a  decrease  in  the  MRR.  
•  Higher   the   vibra=on   frequency   à   lesser   the   chipping   =me  
for  each  grain  à  lower  chipping  ac=on  à  lower  the  MRR  
•  Higher  the  feed  force  à  greater  the  chipping  forces  by  each  
grain  à  higher  the  MRR  
16  
MRR  …  
2.  Abrasives  
•  Both   the   grain   size   and   the   vibra=on   amplitude   have   a   similar  
effect  on  the  removal  rate.  
•  MRR   rises   un=l   the   grain   sizes   reach   the   vibra=on   amplitude,   at  
that  stage,  the  MRR  decreases  
•  Grain   size   >   vibra=on   amplitude   à   difficulty   of   abrasive  
renewal  
•  B4C   à   higher   hardness   à   higher   removal   rates   than   silicon  
carbide  (SiC)  when  machining  glass  

17  
MRR  …  
•  Carrying  liquid:  
Ø  Water  is  commonly  used    
Ø  Benzene,  glycerol,  and  oils  are  other  alterna=ves  
•  Low   slurry   viscosity   à   beTer   flow   of   slurry   à   enhanced  
MRR  
•  Volumetric  concentra=on  of  abrasives:  30  to  35  %  
•  A   change   of   concentra=on   occurs   during   machining   as   a  
result  of  the  abrasive  dust  seTling.  
•  The   actual   concentra=on   should,   therefore,   be   checked   at  
certain  =me  intervals.  

18  
MRR  …  
3.  Workpiece  Impact  Hardness  
•  MRR  is  affected  by  the  ra=o  of  tool  hardness  to  workpiece  hardness.  
•  Higher  the  ra=o  à  Lower  will  be  MRR  (If  tool  hardness  increases,  abrasives  
loose  their  sharpness  and  therefore,  MRR  decreases)  
•  Sok  and  tough  tool  materials  are  used  
4.  Tool  Shape:  Larger  tool  area  à  inadequate  distribu=on  of  abrasive  slurry  
over  the  en=re  area  à  lower  machining  rate  
5.  Sta7c  Pressure:    
•  Lower   than   the   op=mum   à   lower   force   on   the   grain   to   press   into   work  
material  à  low  MRR  
6.  Hole  depth:  Deeper  the  hole,  lower  will  be  the  MRR  
•  Reason:   deeper   the   tool   reaches,   the   more   difficult   and   slower   is   the  
exchange  of  abrasives  from  underneath  the  tool.  
19  
MRR  …  

20
Surface  Quality  
•  Rela=onship  among  grit  number,  grit  size  and  roughness  

 
•  Larger  the  grit  number  (smaller  grain  size),  the  surface  will  be  
smooth.  
•  Larger  the  grit  size,  faster  the  cuMng  rate  but  surface  finish  is  
poor.  
•  However,  other  factors  such  as  tool  surface,  amplitude  of  tool  
vibra=on,  and  material  being  machined  also  affect  the  surface  
finish.   21  
Surface  Quality  …  
•  Higher   amplitude   à   deeper   grain   penetra=ons   into   the  
workpiece  surface  à  deeper  craters  à  rough  surface  
 
•  Sidewalls   are   scratched   by   abrasive   grains   à   roughness   of  
sidewalls  is  larger  than  those  on  the  boTom  

•  Sta=c  pressure  has  a  liTle  effect  on  the  surface  finish  

22  
Accuracy  
Accuracy  is  measured  using  
–  Oversize,    
–  Conicity,  and  
–  Roundness  

23  
Oversize  (Overcut)  
•  Overcut   =   Hole   diameter   (measured   at   the   top   surface)   –   tool  
diameter  
•  Side   gap   between   tool   and   hole   is   necessary   to   enable  
abrasive  flow.    
•  Grain  size  of  the  abrasives  affects  the  overcut  produced  
•  Overcut  >  3  =mes  mean  grain  size  
•  Magnitude   of   overcut   also   depends   on   many   other   process  
parameters   (type   of   workpiece   material   and   the   method   of  
tool  feed).  
•  Accuracy  levels  are  limited  to  +  50  μm  

24  
Conicity  (non-­‐parallel  sides)  
•  Cumula=ve   abrasion   effect   of   fresh   and   sharp   grains   à   greater  
overcut  at  the  entry  side  than  at  the  exit  
•  Example:    
Ø  While  drilling  a  hole  of  20  mm  size,  and  a  depth  of  10  mm  in  
graphite  à  Conicity  =  ~  0.2o  
•  The  conicity  may  be  reduced  by  
–  Use  of  wear-­‐resistant  tool  materials  
–  Use  of  an  undersized  tool  in  the  first  cut  and  a  final  tool  of  the  
required  size,  which  will  cut  faster  and  reduce  the  conicity  
–  Use  of  tools  having  nega=vely  tapered  walls  

25  
Roundness  Error  
•  Roundness  error  arises  by  the  lateral  vibra=ons  of  the  tool  

•  Such  vibra=ons  are  due  to  out  of  perpendicularity  of  tool  face  
and  center  line  

•  Typical  values:  

-­‐  40  -­‐  140  μm  for  glass  and    

-­‐  20-­‐60  μm  for  graphite  

26  
USM  Variants  
1.  Rotary Ultrasonic Machining (RUM)

2.  Ultrasonic  sinking  and  contour  machining  

3.  Ultrasonic  Polishing  

4.  Micro-­‐Ultrasonic  Machining  (MUSM)  

27  
Rotary  Ultrasonic  Machining  (RUM)  
•  Tool  is  rotated  similar  to  conven=onal  
drilling  
•  Deep  holes  require  longer  =me  as  the  
rate   of   machining   decreases   with   the  
depth   of   penetra=on.   This   is   due   to  
the   difficulty   in   maintaining   a  
con=nuous   supply   of   new   slurry   at   the  
tool  face.  
•  Rota=on  of  tool  enables:  
Ø High  removal  rates,  lower  tool  pressures  for  delicate  parts  
Ø Improved  deep  hole  drilling  
•  Depth-­‐to-­‐diameter  ra=o  of  2.5  is  achievable  by  RUM   28  
Ultrasonic  sinking  and  contour  machining  

•  Drawbacks  with  ultrasonic  sinking:    


Ø  If   depth   >   5   to   7   mm,   renewal   of   abrasives   at   the   interface   becomes  
difficult  à  material  removal  is  impossible  
Ø  Manufacturing  of  such  a  tool  is  generally  complex  and  costly.  
•  Contouring  USM  -­‐  simple  tools  that  are  moved  along  the  contour  required  
Ultrasonic  sinking  and  contour  machining  

(contour  USM)  
Silicon  nitride  turbine  blades  
(sinking)  

30  
Ultrasonic  Polishing  
•  Fine   abrasive   par=cles   abrade   the   high   spots   of   the   workpiece  
surface  
•  BriTle  tool  material  (graphite  or  glass)  is  used  
•  Removes  12  μm  of  material  or  less  
•  Surface  roughness:  0.3  μm  

Fig. Ultrasonic polishing done for 2 min to remove the machining marks left by
a CNC engraving operation.
31  
Micro-­‐Ultrasonic  Machining  (MUSM)  
•  U=lizes  workpiece  vibra=on  
•  Vibra=ng  the  workpiece  allows  flexibility  in  tool  system  design  
as  it  does  not  include  the  set  of  transducer,  horn,  and  cone.  
•  In   addi=on,   the   complete   system   is   much   more   simple   and  
compact  than  conven=onal  USM.  
•  Micro-­‐holes   of   5   μm   diameter   on   quartz,   glass,   and   silicon  
have  been  produced  using  tungsten  carbide  (WC)  alloy  micro-­‐
tools  
•  Can  machine  3-­‐D  shapes  

32  
MUSM - Concept

Micro-­‐ultrasonic  machined  cavity  

Micro-­‐ultrasonic  machining   33  
Advantages  of  USM  
•  CuMng   forces   are   low   à   induced   stresses   are   too   less   à  
hence  no  structural  changes  

•  No   direct   contact   of   tool   with   workpiece   à   wet   cuMng  


process  à  no  thermal  changes  

•  Surfaces  produced  are  free  from  burrs  and  distor=ons  

•  Good  surface  finish  

•  Environmental  friendly  process  


34  
Limita=ons  of  USM  
•  Sok  materials  (lead  and  plas=cs)  tend  to  absorb  the  abrasive  
par=cles   rather   than   to   chip   under   their   impact   à   Not  
suitable  by  the  USM  
•  Power  consump=on  is  quite  high  
•  Tool  wear  rate  is  high  
•  Larger  areas  of  machining  and  higher  depths  are  not  possible  
•  If   the   axes   of   the   tool   and   horn,   which   are   brazed   together,  
are   not   properly   aligned   with   the   transducer   axis   à   strong  
lateral  vibra=ons  à  tapered  holes  
•  Sharp   corners   of   the   tool   get   rounded   off   à   frequent   tool  
replacements  for  producing  accurate  blind  holes  
35  
USM  -­‐  Applica=ons  
•  Suitable   for   machining   hard   and   briTle   materials   such   as  
glass,  ceramics  and  carbides.  
•  Also  successful  on  stainless  steel  and  =tanium  
•  Coining  opera=ons  -­‐  paTern  on  tool  is  imparted  to  a  flat  work  
surface  
•  Par=ng  and  machining  of  precious  stones  including  diamond  
•  Drilling   small   holes   in   helicopter   power   transmission   shaks  
and  gears.  
•  Used  for  punch  and  die  making  

36  

You might also like