Anatolia Cultural Foundation

Agence du revenu
l+I Canada Revenue

Agency du Canada
REGISTERED MAIL
JAN O2 2019 BN: 844104265RROOOI
File #: 3043592
Dear :
Subject: Notice of intention to revoke

Anatolia Cultural Foundation
We are writing with respect to our letter dated August 2, 2017, (copy enclosed), in which
the Anatolia Cultural Foundation (the Organization) was invited to respond to the
findings of the audit conducted by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), and explain why
the registration of the Organization should not be revoked in accordance with
subsection 168( I) of the Income Tax Act.
We have reviewed and considered your written response(s) dated November 21. 2017.
Your reply has not alleviated our concerns with respect to the Organization's non-
compliance with the requirements of the Act for registration as a charity. Our concerns
are explained in Appendix A attached.
Conclusion
The audit by the CRA found that the Organization is not complying with the
requirements set out in the Act. In particular, it was found that the Organization did not
devote all its resources to charitable purposes and activities; gifted resources to non-
qualified donees both inside and outside Canada; failed to maintain and provide books
and records to allow the CRA to verify revenue, expenses, and use ofresources; failed to
issue official donation receipts in accordance with the Act/ or its Regulations; and failed
to file a Registered Charity Information Return (T30 I 0) as prescribed by the Act.
Our analysis of the information obtained during our audit of the Organization has Jed the
CRA to believe that the Organization, through its various funding and gifting
arrangements, may have extended the benefits of its status as a registered charity to
support the activities of various organizations that are Iinked to or openly support the
Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and/or armed militia groups and political groups that are
closely aligned with the PKK. The PKK was listed as a terrorist entitv in Canada
effective December I 0, 2002 and remains listed today. For all of these reasons, and for
each reason alone, it is the position of the CRA that the Organization no longer meets the
Canada A350 E (08)

-2-
requirements for charitable registration and should be revoked in the manner described in
subsection 168( 1) of the Act.
For each of the reasons mentioned in our letter dated August 2, 2017, pursuant to
subsection 168(1) and 149.1(2) of the Act, we propose to revoke the registration of the
Organization. By virtue of subsection 168(2) of the Act, revocation will be effective on
the date of publication of the following notice in the Canada Gazette:
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraphs I68(1)(b), I68(l)(c),

I68(1)(d), I68(1)(e), and subsection 149.1(2), of the Income Tax Act that
I propose to revoke the registration of the charity listed below and that by
virtue of paragraph 168(2)(b) thereof, the revocation of registration is
effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette.
Business number Name

844104265RROOO 1 Anatolia Cultural Foundation
North York ON
Should the Organization choose to object to this notice of intention to revoke the
Organization's registration in accordance with subsection 168(4) of the Act, a written
notice of objection, with the reasons for objection and all relevant facts, must be filed
within 90 days from the day this letter was mailed. The notice of objection should be sent
to:
Tax and Charities Appeals Directorate

Appeals Branch
Canada Revenue Agency
250 Albert Street
Ottawa ON KIA OL5
However, a copy of the revocation notice, described above, will be published in

the Canada Gazette after the expiration of 30 days from the date this letter was
mailed. As such, the Organization's registration will be revoked on the date of
publication, unless the CRA receives an order, within the next 30 days, from the
Federal Court of Appeal issued under paragraph I68(2)(b) of the Act extending
that period.
Please note that the Organization must obtain a stay to suspend the revocation
process, even though it may have filed a notice of objection.
A copy of the relevant provisions of the Act concerning revocation of registration,

including appeals from a notice of intention to revoke registration, can be found in
Appendix B, attached.
-3-
Consequences of revocation
As of the effective date of revocation:
a) the Organization will no longer be exempt from Part l tax as a registered charity
and will no longer be permitted to issue official donation receipts. This means
that gifts made to the Organization would not be allowable as tax credits to
individual donors or as allowable deductions to corporate donors under subsection
118.1 (3) and paragraph 110.1 ( 1)(a) of the Act respectively;
b) by virtue of section 188 of the Act, the Organization will be required to pay a tax
within one year from the date of the notice of intention to revoke. This revocation
tax is calculated on Form T2046, Tax Return Where Registration of a Charity is
Revoked (the Return). The Return must be filed, and the tax paid, on or before the
day that is one year from the date of the notice of intention to revoke. The
relevant provisions of the Act concerning the tax applicable to revoked charities
can also be found in Appendix B. Form T2046 and the related Guide RC4424,
Completing the Tax Return Where Registration of a Charity is Revoked. are
available on our website at canada.ca/charities-giving;
c) the Organization will no longer qualify as a charity for purposes of subsection

123(1) of the Excise Tax Act. As a result, the Organization may be subject to
obligations and entitlements under the Excise Tax Act that apply to organizations
other than charities. If you have any questions about your Goods and Services
Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST) obligations and entitlements, please call
GST/HST Rulings at 1-888-830-7747 (Quebec) or 1-800-959-8287 (rest of
Canada).
Finally, we advise that subsection 150(1) of the Act requires that every corporation (other
than a corporation that was a registered charity throughout the year) file a return of
income with the Minister in the prescribed form, containing prescribed information, for
each taxation year. The return of income must be filed without notice or demand.
Yours sincerely,
Tony Manconi
Director General
Charities Directorate
Attachments:
• Appendix A, Comments on representations
-4-
• Appendix B, Relevant provisions of the Act

• Appendix C, CRA letter dated August 2, 2017
• Appendix D, Organization's representations dated November 20, 2017
c.c.:
Mr. Ilhan Ulutas

Ms. Khenaw Rahmati

Appendix A
COMMENTS ON REPRESENTATIONS
Based on the results of the Canada Revenue Agency's (CRA) audit of the Anatolia Cultural
Foundation (the Organization), and after careful consideration of the Organization's
representations dated November 20, 2017, it remains our position that the identified areas of non-
compliance with the provisions of the Income Tax Act (the Act) and/or its Regulations are
sufficiently serious to warrant revocation of the Organization's registration.
The reasons for revocation are described in greater detail in this Appendix, which addresses the
Organization's representations regarding the non-compliance issues identified in the CRA's
Administrative Fairness Letter (AFL) dated August 2, 2017.
This Appendix contains:
• a summary of the issues raised by the CRA in our AFL dated August 2, 2017;
• a summary of the representations provided to the CRA by the Organization's
representative, , on November 20, 2017; and
• the CRA's conclusions as it pertains to the non-compliance issues identified.
The audit relates to the operations of the Organization for the period from January 1, 2011, to
December 31, 2014.
As confirmed by the Federal Court of Appeal in Canada, the onus is on the registered
charity to demonstrate that the CRA has erred or that the audit findings should not result in
revocation. 1 This means that an organization must provide irrefutable evidence to fully alleviate
the CRA's concerns.
The Federal Court of Appeal in Canada has also confirmed2 that the CRA has the statutory
discretion to reasonably select the appropriate compliance tool provided by the Act. As
such, in serious cases of non-compliance, it may move directly to revocation.
The remainder of this Appendix provides a summary of the CRA's audit findings, the
Organization's representations with respect to those findings, and the CRA's final conclusion.
1 See Public Television Association of Quebec v. Canada (National Revenue), 2015 FCA 170 and Canadian
Committee for the Tel Aviv Foundation v Canada 2002 FCA 72
2
See Christ Apostolic Church of God Mission International v. MNR, 2009 FCA 162, 2009 DTC 5102 and
International Pentecostal Ministry Fellowship of Toronto (1PM) v. The Minister of National Revenue 20 IO FCA 51.
1.0 Ceased to comply with the requirements of the Act for its continued registration
1.1 Advancement of an unstated purpose

CRA's position
The Organization has undertaken a scholarship program in order to support students in Turkey.
Our review of both this activity and the Organization's purposes indicates that the scholarship
program does not advance any of the Organization's stated purposes. There is no purpose that
explicitly enables the Organization to provide scholarships. As such, the CRA considers the
Organization to be advancing an unstated purpose.
The Organization's Representations

The Organization submits that its scholarship program falls within its third and fourth purposes
namely the - relief of poverty, and the relief of poverty, sickness, and distress by the provision of
humanitarian aid. As access to post-secondary education in Turkey is highly dependent on
income level, the scholarship program supported students for the poorest families in the region.
Mr. Attilla Firat, a member of the Confederation of Public Workers' Unions (KESK), contacted
the Organization's president Adnan Kaya to see if the Organization would provide help with the
many poor students who apply for financial support from KESK. After reviewing Mr. Firat's
proposal the Organization decided to operate a scholarship program and appointed Mr. Firat as to
administer the program on their behalf. The Organization developed and provided a copy of its
scholarship program policies.
The Organization provided $900 per student per month. The Organization's former president
interviewed all 54 applicants and chose 20 to receive the scholarship. Mr. Firat, as the
Organization's agent, provided the information on the 20 students chosen to ensure all were in
need. The Organization transferred monthly amounts to the students for a year and had full
direction and control over the funds.
CRA's conclusion
On October 8, 2015, the CRA requested additional information regarding the scholarship
program from the Organization's president, Mr. Kaya. Specifically, the Organization was asked
to provide:
• the selection criteria used for awarding monetary scholarships to students;

• the procedures in place to ensure the students meet the selection criteria in order to
receive the scholarships;
• copies of scholarship applications received during the fiscal period;
• copies of promotional material used to advertise the scholarship; and
• documentation showing that the students were enrolled in a program at that university.
In its response, the Organization provided a letter assigning Mr. Firat power of attorney and
indicating that he would be acting on the Organization's behalf with respect to the scholarship
project in Turkey. In addition, the Organization provided copies of wire transfers from Mr. Firat
to the students.
2
The Organization did not provide any of the information requested in the October 8, 2015, letter.
Subsequently, in response to the August 2, 2017, AFL, the Organization submitted one
additional record: the scholarship program terms and conditions. This document fails to provide
the information requested by the CRA. As such, we cannot determine whether the scholarship
program is charitable in nature. Furthermore, the Organization failed to produce any other
documentation to substantiate the representations contained in its letter of November 20, 2017.
For example, the Organization:
• failed to provide any information as to how it determined that the students were in need
of financial assistance;
• failed to provide a copy of the proposal submitted by Mr. Firat, or any documentation to
support the decision to administer a scholarship program;
• failed to provide any of the applications for the scholarship program or the criteria used
to determine which of the twenty students would receive assistance; and
• failed to provide supporting documents to demonstrate that the students were enrolled in
a post-secondary education program.
Despite its claim that it is relieving poverty, the Organization has not demonstrated that this is, in
fact, the case. While the provision of scholarships is traditionally seen as advancing education, it
is possible for such activities to be considered to be relieving poverty. However, in order to
relieve poverty in the charitable sense, the Organization is required to meet a different standard
than it would if it were advancing education.
The Organization has stated that the recipients of scholarship funds "could barely provide money
for their transportation". However the Organization has not demonstrated that it undertook a
means test to determine if the students were in need of financial assistance. The failure to
conduct a means test, or at the very least, provide the subsequent records to the CRA to
demonstrate that it had undertaken such an analysis suggests that the Organization was unaware
of the student's actual financial needs.
As the Organization has not provided any information to demonstrate that the students it
provided assistance to were in financial need, and that the provision of a scholarship was thus
relieving poverty, the CRA is unable to validate whether this activity furthers any of the
Organization's stated purposes.
We have considered the Organization's representations in this regard, however, it remains our
position that the Organization has failed to demonstrate that its scholarship program is charitable
in nature or that the program advanced one of its charitable purposes.
Consequently, it remains our position that the Organization has ceased to comply with the
requirements of subsection 149.1 (1) of the Act for its continued registration, and for this reason
there are grounds for the revocation of its charitable status pursuant to paragraph 168( 1)(b) of the
Act.
3
1.2 Collateral non-charitable purpose
CRA's position
As detailed above, in Section 1.1, the Organization was registered with the understanding that it
would be conducting activities in support of its charitable purposes.
An analysis of the activities actually being undertaken by the Organization, as outlined below in
Section 1.3, appears to suggest a focus, not on relieving poverty or advancing knowledge related
to the Kurdish language, art, or literature, but on advancing and promoting a political ideology
associated with the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), an organization listed as a terrorist entity in
Canada on December 10, 2002, 3 and which remains listed to date. Public Safety Canada provides
the following description of the PKK. 4
Formally established in Turkey in 1978 by Abdullah Ocalan, the Kurdistan Workers

Party (PKK / KADEK) is a Kurdish political pm1y whose main goal is the creation of
an independent Kurdish state in southeast Turkey and in no11hem Iraq, a region that is
part of the traditional territory of the Kurdish people. To reach its goal, the PKK /
KADEK has led a campaign of guerrilla warfare and terrorism, especially in Turkey
and in northern Iraq. Its activities include attacking the Turkish military, diplomats and
Turkish businesses at home and in some western European cities. It has also been
known to bomb resorts and kidnap tourists in an attempt to destabilize tourism in
Turkey.
Such activities regardless of whether they were ancillary and incidental would be considered an
activity contrary to Canadian public policy and therefore not charitable. However, as such
activities appear to have become the Organization's main focus, encapsulating most, if not all, of
its resources, it is the CRA's preliminary position that the Organization may be advancing a
collateral non charitable purpose.
Organization's representations
The Organization submits that the audit findings in this regard are based on speculation and a
fundamental misunderstanding of the complex situation of the Kurdish people. The Organization
submits that all its activities are charitable and fall under either the advancement of education or
the relief of poverty, including the provision of humanitarian aid.
CRA's conclusion
After analyzing the Organization's representations in their entirety, the CRA has concluded that
the Organization is advancing a non-charitable purpose. In reaching this determination, the CRA
considered the following audit findings:
1. The Organization maintained a close relationship with, and subsidized the Kurdish
festival that was run by the openly pro-PKK Toronto Kurdish Community Centre.
3
https ://www.pub Iicsa fetv .gc. ca/en t/ ntn 1-scrt/c ntr-trrrs m/1std-n tts/ inde x-e n.aspx
4
Ibid
4
2. The Organization funded the Rojava Media Project, whose stated goal was to
document the revolution in Rojava, and whose documentary prominently featured
scenes about the PKK and associated groups.
3. The Organization provided funding and resources to several overseas programs over
which it failed to demonstrate that it maintained direction and control over the
resources it devoted to those programs. In addition, each of the intermediaries it
worked with on those projects appeared to be associated with, supportive of, or
belonged to, an organization which was politically aligned with the PKK.
4. Two of the Organization's primary decision makers appear to be openly supportive of
the PKK itself and/or groups associated with the PKK.
5. Over $160,000 (40% of the Organization's revenue from the audit period) was
provided to groups or individuals associated with, or supportive of, the PKK.
The Organization has not provided any new documentation or meaningful representations to
dispute the audit findings in this regard. In its response the Organization claims to have no
knowledge of the connections between its funding recipients and the PKK, and dismisses its key
member's support for the PKK as " ...totally understandable" given the given the complex
situation and the oppression the Kurdish people are facing in Turkey, Syria, Iran, and Iraq.
In addition, while not part of the grounds for revocation set out in the AFL, our research
indicates that the Organization is continuing to engage with organizations alleged to be
associated with the PKK. We note, for example, the Organization's April 2017 donations to
Heyva Sor a Kurdistane (HSK). 5 6 HSK is not listed as being part of the International Federation
of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.7
According to both the HSK website, 8 and the Organization's Facebook page, 9 the Organization
appears to have partnered with One Free World International and
to donate $500,000 in medical supplies to HSK. While it is not clear how these medical supplies
were to be used, the Organization's Facebook page states: "Thank you for contributing to save
the lives of those fighting ISIS and the Christians, Yazidis, Kurds and other minorities facing
persecution." 10
Mr. El-Shafie, of One Free World International, goes even further saying:
Today the Kurdish peoples fighting great evil. Fighting the western countries trust to fight
ISIS and the great victory that they are receiving right now. The Kurdish people should
not, fight alone. Today, we will stand with you. All Canada will stand with you. Myself,
my organization, One Free World International will stand with you . My partners will stand
with you. This fight is not only your fight. This fight is the fight for all humanity. I don't
5 According to its website, HSK was founded in Germany in 1993. HSK appears to be an umbrella organization with
branches in France, Switzerland, Netherlands, Sweden, Austria, Denmark, England, Norway, Italy, Belgium, Syria,
Iraq, Japan, and Canada. Source: http://www.heyvasor.com/en/alikari/
6
Also known as Kurdish Red Crescent (English), and Kurdischer Roter Halbmond (German).
7
http:/ /media. ifrc.org/ itrc/who-we-are/national-soc ieties/nati ona 1-societies-d irectorv/
8
http://hskurd.org/ar/2017/04/ 1.i.....;s_.l-..c _i,-u)) ~t""-~-'..rUL.,..J~l-1 7 /JI /
9
www.facebook.com/ ACFcharity
10
www.facebook.com/ ACFcharity/posts/ l 407737902626 536
5
have to be Kurdish in order to fight for you or to support you. I only have to be a human.
So on behalf of Canada and the Canadian people, we love you. We thank you for your
sacrifices. And today this is a simple gift of medication to stand beside your troops [sic]
that fighting in Rojava. [Emphasis added]
Both quotes indicate that the medical supplies, given to HSK, are to be used for individuals who
are engaged in combat. Furthermore, publicly available information suggests there may be an
association between the HSK and the PKK. The German government, in particular the
Bundesamt ftir Verfassungsschutz (BfV) - the domestic intelligence service of the Federal
Republic of Germany - issued a warning on its website of increased PKK activity in Germany
and singled out the Kurdischer Roter Halbmond, the German language name for the HSK, 11 for
being close to the PKK. 12
On May 20, 2010, the German state of Rhineland Pfalz banned the HSK from collecting
donations because the donations it had collected were not being used in support of the purpose
for which they had been collected; it appeared, instead, that donations were being used to support
organizations identified in the BfV's Report on the Protection of the Constitution. 13 14 The ban
on HSK appears to remain in place. 15 16 HSK also appears on the German state of Bavaria' s 17 list
of extremist groups since at least 2007. 18 19
The Organization appears to have entered into a funding relationship with the HSK. In this
regard, the Organization's name, contact information, and bank account details appear on the
HSK website under the 'donations' tab with other Kurdish Red Crescent organizations from
around the world. 20 This suggests that the Organization is acting as a conduit for resources from
Canada to the HSK.
In addition, the Organization appears to be mirroring HSK messaging, and portraying HSK's
projects as its own. For example, on its Facebook page, the Organization posted verbatim
11
http://www.heyvasor.com/en/ nasname/
12
https ://www. verfassu n gs sch utz.de/de/oeffentl ichke itsarbe it/news letter/newsletter-arch ive/bfv-newsletter-
archiv/bfv-news letter-2014-1 /bfv-newsletter-2014-01-08.html
13
The Report on the Protection of the Constitution provides information on the nature and scope of anti-
constitutional developments, on organisations and groupings pursuing activities that are directed against the tree
democratic basic order, on espionage against Germany, and on proliferation .... [t]his report focuses on violence-
oriented activities. The Annual Report on the Protection of the Constitution significantly contributes to raising
awareness about the level of the threat posed to the German state and society. Source:
https ://www.verfassungsschutz.de/en/pub Iic-relations/pub lications/annual-reports/annua l-report-20 17-summary
14
https ://add.rlp.de/fileadmin/add/ Abteilung 2/Referat 23/Sammlungsrecht/Pressemitteilungen/10-06-
0 I Heyva Sor a Kurdistane e. V.pdf
15
http ://www.heyvasor.com/en/komkiri na-al ikari-1 i-herema-bundesland-rhei n land-pfa lze/
16
http://www.heyvasor.com/en/a \ikari/
17
Bavarian State Government's Min is try of State of the Interior published a directory of extremist organizations
dated November 27. 2007, AIIMBI p. 693 . StAnz no. 50).
18
http ://www.gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Document!BavVV I08268
19
https:/ /www .oth-regensburg.de/fi leadm in/med ia/hochsc.hule/ organ isation/verwaltung/personal/Prak A ntrag. pdf
20
http ://www.heyvasor.com/en/alikari/
6
22
wording, as well as the same images, that were used in HSK' s sibling campaign,21 emergency
aid appeal campaign,23 24 and other campaigns. 25 26
In light the above, and the Organization's apparent pattern of associating with, and providing
resources to, organizations that are associated with and/or promote the PKK, it remains our
position that the Organization appears to be advancing and promoting a political ideology
associated with the PKK.
The courts have confirmed that an organization that undertakes activities that further an unstated
non-charitable purpose is not eligible for registration as a charity under the Act. 27
Consequently, the Organization has ceased to comply with requirements of subsection 149.1(1)
of the Act for its continued registration, and for this reason there are grounds for the revocation
of its charitable status pursuant to paragraph 168( 1)(b) of the Act.
1.3.1 - Support to organizations whose resources may be used to support the efforts of a
political organization, armed militia groups, and/or a listed terrorist entity
a) CRA's position - the Rojava Media Project (RMP)

The audit findings indicate that the Organization provided funding for Mr. Sardar Saadi and
Mr. Massood Manaf of the Rojava Media Project (RMP) to travel to Rojava, Syria to provide
media training to students to document their struggle during the Rojava revolution.
The RMP appears, on the surface, to be about providing young people with "media production
equipment, training & and venues of publication." However, a review of the RMP's online
presence suggests there is a focus on raising "awareness about the struggle of the Kurds in
Rojava" and empowering "the young Kurds and other ethnic groups, in Rojava to advance their
struggles by creating their own media."
Our analysis of content produced by the RMP strongly indicates the existence of an alternative
political purpose, namely to "empower young people to write, document, and film their stories of
revolution and resistance ... [The RMP] seeks to provide a medium for making the voices and
vision of the people of Rojava heard around the world." The RMP appears to be a venue to
promote Kurdish autonomy in the region, or at the very least, the struggle to achieve it, however,
our analysis of the videos produced by RMP suggests that they may be promoting and glorifying
21
https://d.faccbook.cmn/storyJ2hJ2.?storv_fbid = 1I 7 1757089557953&substorv indcx=O&id=85446346 12873 I9& tn =*s-R and
hllps ://\ymy~laccbook.com/76272 6007 132709/photos/a.884504 26828821 5. I 073741829.762726007134,70~0 041089755962998/?tvpc 3
00
22
http: //www.heyvasor.com/en/kampanyasirnex/
23
https://d.facebook.com/story .php?storv tbid= l 176190349 1 I4627&id=S54463461 2873 I 9& tn =*s-R
24
http://www.heyvasor.corn/en/ banga-al ikariye-j i-bo-cizir-sur-silopi-hezex-n isebi n-u-kerborane/
25
http://www.heyvasor.com/wp-content/uploads/20 I7/07 /
26
https://www.facebook.com/ACFcharity/photos/a.1454 79583 92074
27
Vancouver Society of Immigrant and Visible Minority Women v Minister of National Revenue [I 999] I S.C.R.
I 0., at paragraph I 56, where Mr. Justice Iacobucci, speaking for the majority, cite with approval the comments of
Denning L.J. in British Launderers' Research Association v. Borough of Hendon Racing Authority [1949] I K.B.
462 (C.A. at pp. 467-68, as applied by the Supreme Court of Canada in Guaranty Trust Company of Canada v.
MinisterofNational Revenue [1967] S.C.R. 133 .
7
the resistance by the PKK, the People's Protection Units (YPG), and the Women's Protection
Unit (YPJ), two armed militant groups closely aligned with the PKK.
The Organization did not provide its own response with respect to concerns regarding material
produced by the RMP that glorified and promoted the PKK and closely aligned militant groups.
Rather, the substantive response came from the RMP's representative, Mr. Sardar Saadi, and was
attached to the Organization's submission as 'Appendix 2'.
Appendix 2- Response to section 1.3.1 (a) Rojava Media Project
Mr. Saadi submits that the RMP "aimed to provide basic means and trainings of documentary
filmmaking for Kurdish youth in high conflict areas of the Middle East to empower them to
document their stories of struggle and make their voices heard." That struggle, according to
Mr. Saadi is
·• ... not just a political or military struggle, but struggle to keep their daily life going, to
preserve hope and determination in the face of an evil group such as ISIS, and to promise
a future that could bring happiness to the people on their own homeland and not
beyond."
Mr. Saadi represented that the RMP does not have a hidden and undeclared political purpose; nor
does it have a hidden agenda of providing support for any political organizations. The RMP does
not "promote" or "glorify" the resistance by the PKK and the YPG/YPJ. In this regard, Mr. Saadi
contends:
" ... there is an accepted principal of the freedom of artistic expression that even goes
beyond the universal freedom of expression. When a young group of students who for
the first time handle cameras in their life and want to document their everyday living
conditions and happenings, of course they wanted to show the most obvious
happenings in their life: people who die fighting against ISIS and those who still fight.
Many of our students were coming from families who had lost one or more members
in this fight. They are incredibly impacted by what was going on in their region. The
only ones that fight against ISIS or the military forces of Rojava are members of the
YPG that ideologically follow the PKK's leader Abdullah Ocalan, but they are not
associated with the PKK. Ocalan's pictures are everywhere in Rojava, and it is a source
of inspiration for their resistance. It is normal for these young students to show those
places where their dead rest forever, for the respect their people show to their dead,
and to have Ocalan's picture at their ceremonies."
RMP received $10,000 from the Organization. which was spent on a cameras, other equipment,
and travel expenses. A detailed list of expenses and receipts has been provided to the CRA.
Mr. Saadi argues CRA 's position regarding the Organization and the RMP is incongruent with
that of the Government of Canada as a whole, which '· ... promotes any kind of humanitarian and
even military support for those that have been fighting against ISIS.''
8
Finally, Mr. Saadi contends that the Organization, and the RMP, cannot separate its work and
activities from the people they are trying to support and raise awareness about. And, both the
Organization and the RMP believe the activities to conform to all Canadian laws, rights, and
freedoms - particularly freedom of expression.
CRA's conclusion
As stated in our August 2, 2017, AFL, the Organization's funding of the RMP is problematic, as
the project appears to be an avenue for promoting Kurdish autonomy, and the armed resistance
spearheaded by the PKK, the YPG, and the YPJ, neither of which are accepted charitable
activities under the law.
The Organization's response, authored by Mr. Saadi of the RMP, focuses primarily on defending
the Organization's decision to support the RMP, rather than addressing our concerns with the
project itself.
The Organization submits that the RMP is "primarily educational, but also represents activities
that seek to foster an understanding of human rights issues through the dissemination of reports,
materials, documentary films and discussions." The CRA recognizes that there are many
potential charitable purposes and activities that can uphold human rights. However, in order for
the CRA to accept the Organization's position that the RMP is educational and fosters an
understanding of human rights, the CRA would have to be satisfied that the Organization has met
certain conditions, namely that it:
I) be established for the purpose of promoting or defending human rights; and

2) conduct charitable activities in support of its charitable purposes, and meet the necessary
public benefit test.
First, the Organization is not established to educate, uphold, or "foster an understanding of

human rights issues." In addition, as outlined in Section 1.2, above, the audit found that the
Organization appeared to promote a non-charitable collateral purpose, namely advancing and
promoting a political ideology associated with a listed terrorist entity.
Second, rather than conducting activities that focused on fostering human rights issues and the
atrocities committed by the Islamic State (ISIS), the documentary funded by the Organization
highlights the activities of the 'martyrs' of the PKK, depicts celebrations in support of the PKK,
and recognizes the role of the PKK in the revolution. As one student in the documentary notes, 'I
am taking part in Rojava Media Project to learn about camera and media production, and to
produce films on our times in this revolution;' a revolution in which violence plays a critical
role. The Organization's response confirms that it has a good understanding of the PKK and its
political ideology, and was aware that the YPG " .. .ideologically follow[ s] the PKK's leader
Abdullah Ocalan.'' The Organization also represented that" ... Ocalan's pictures are everywhere
in Rojava, and it is a source of inspiration for their resistance." Activities of this nature do not
meet the requisite public benefit element that a charity's resources be devoted to charitable
activities.
9
We also considered Mr. Saadi's representation that RMP is an 'educational project' which
"provide[d] the basic means and trainings (sic) of documentary filmmaking for Kurdish youth in
high conflict areas of the Middle East to empower them to document their stories of struggle and
make their voices heard."
ln order to qualify as advancing education, the RMP would require a structured curriculum and a
qua! ified instructor, the details of which the Organization has not provided. The Organization has
not presented anything that would indicate Mr. Saadi has an educational or a professional
background in providing training for documentary filmmaking. Furthermore, as detailed in CRA
summary policy CSP-S 10, Policy Institutes, the end result of any educational activity must be
free of bias and not promote a single point of view. 28 The courts have affirmed this principle in
several decisions:
Educating people from a particular political or moral perspective may be educational

in the charitable sense in that it enables listeners to make an informed and critical
choice. However, an activity is not educational in the charitable sense when it is
undertaken "solely to promote a particular point of view" (per Iacobucci J. in
Vancouver Society v. MN R., [ 1999] 1 S. C.R. 10, at paragraph 169).29
Mr. Saadi also claims that the RMP's purpose is not to promote the Kurdish autonomy as the
"Rojava region is an autonomous region" and as such "there is no need for us to promote it."
While the Rojava region has self-declared autonomy, this declaration has not been recognized by
Syria, the United States,30 or any other country. 31 With little international support for an
autonomous Rojava, the people and political organizations would need to promote, not only its
efforts to defend against Islamic State attacks, but its political revolution, which has transformed
how the region is governed.
Despite Mr. Saadi's assertions that there is no need to promote Kurdish autonomy, we note that
Mr. Saadi has written articles, and appeared on television and in online videos calling for people
to not only support Rojava in its defence against ISIS, 32 but to also support its revolution. 33
Mr. Saadi also submits, on behalf of the Organization, that the views and images depicted in the
RMP documentary are " ... within the rights and freedoms in Canada, such as freedom of
expression." The CRA respects the rights and freedoms of all Canadians; however, the
requirements for registration are clear in terms of what qualifies as charitable under the Act and
28
https://www .canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/charities-giving/charities/policies-guidance/summary-policy-
s I 0-policy-institutes.htm.l
29
Challenge Team v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue), 2000-03-29
30
https://www.dw.com/en/syrias-kurds-approve-establishment-of-autonomous-region/a-19125 824
31
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29702440
32
Everyone who cares about the future of this region must show their solidarity with Rojava. Must show their
solidarity with the Kobani resistance. Must show and do whatever they have in their hands to stop this brutal attacks
by ISIS group. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= MdDp2HjRijA
33
In order to do a media project with youth in Rojava in order to set up a centre, a media centre to do a media
production training program for young men and women in Rojava to feel, to document their own stories of
resistance, own stories of revolution by their own hands. We give them tools and trainings that they need to do this
because we believe the people of Rojava, those that must be heard, and must be followed, they have a real
alternative for the whole region. Source: https://www.youtube .com/watch?v=MdDp2HjRljA
10
the common law. As outlined in our AFL, the activity is not charitable and when considered with
the other activities of the organization, indicates that the organization has a collateral, non-
charitable purpose.
Finally, the Organization suggests that the CRA is being incongruent with the policy position
taken by the Government of Canada. which Mr. Saadi submits, " ... promotes any kind of
humanitarian and even military support for those that have been fighting against ISIS.''
It is important to recognize that the provisions of the Act pe1iaining to the registration and
revocation of charities are solely concerned with the tax treatment of Canadian charities and their
donors. The CRA has a responsibility as a regulator to protect and maintain public confidence in
the charitable sector by ensuring that Canadian registered charities meet the legislative
requirements for obtaining and maintaining charitable registration. This ensures that the benefits
of charitable registration are made available only to organizations that operate exclusively for
charitable purposes and charitable activities, including ensuring that registered charities do not
make their resources available, directly or indirectly, to organizations or individuals that are
engaged in terrorist activities, or activities intended to support ten-orist activities. 34
It is well established at law that a registered charity cannot be considered to be operating in

suppo1i of a recognized charitable purpose if its activities are illegal or contrary to public
policy. 35 Canadian public policy recognizes that depriving terrorist organizations of access to
resources, directly or indirectly, undermines terrorist activities by weakening the supporting
logistical and social infrastructures of terrorist organizations. 36
Canada ·s counter-terrorism strategy - Building Resilience Against Terrorism 37 - sets out the
basic principles and elements underpinning the Government's counter-terrorism activities. It
states that all Government activity is directed towards one or more of four elements addressing
the terrorist threat: Prevent, Detect, Deny an<l Respond [emphasis added].
Specifically, the strategy names the Charities Directorate of the CRA as playing an integral part
in detecting and addressing the risks to the charitable sector through reviewing applications for
charitable registration and conducting audits. When a risk is detected, the Strategy outlines the
impo1iance of the CRA's "significant compliance measures" which include the denial of, or
revocation of, registered charity status for "applicants and registered charities that do not comply
with the Income Tax Act by directly or indirectly making their resources available to support
terrorist entities."
34
CRA Guidance - Canadian Registered Charities Carrying Out Activities Outside of Canada. http://www.cra-
arc.gc.ca/chrts-gvng/chrts/plcy/cgd/tsd-cnd-eng.html
35
Summary Policy, CSP-PI3. See Everywoman 's Health Centre Society (1988) v. Canada (Minister ofNational
Revenue) [1992] 2 F.C 52 and Canadian Magen David Adorn for Israel v. Canada (Minister of Revenue) 2002 FCA
323
36
See "Harper Government Releases Air India Inquiry Action Plan: Roadmap to help ensure terrible and senseless
act is never repeated." http://www.publicsafetv.gc.ca/mcdia/nr/20 I O/nr20 I 01207-envlSpx and ""Backgrounder:
Terrorist Financing." http:i/www.publicsafetv.gc.ca/media/nr/20IO/nr20IO 1207-3-eng.aspx
37
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/rslnc-gnst-tmsm/
11
As such, the CRA's position in this matter is entirely consistent with the Government of
Canada's counter-terrorism strategy. While the CRA recognizes that some charities may be
operating in parts of the world where terrorism and other forms of violence prevail, we would
expect any charity in such a position to take the necessary steps to ensure compliance with the
requirements for registration. As stated in the CRA guidance 'Canadian registered charities
carrying out activities outside Canada': "Charities have to remember their obligations under
Canada's anti-terrorism legislation. As with all individuals and organizations in Canada, charities
are responsible for making sure that they do not operate in association with individuals or groups
that are engaged in terrorist activities, or that support terrorist activities."
The Organization's representations have not alleviated the concerns set out in our AFL.
requirements of the Act by contravening the requirement in subsection 149.1 (1) that its resources
be devoted to charitable activities. This constitutes sufficient reason to revoke the Organization's
registration as a charity under paragraph 168(l)(b) of the Act.
b) CRA's position - the Kurdish Community Centre of Toronto

Documentation provided by the Organization as part of the audit, as well as a review of publicly
available material, suggests the Organization has a close relationship with the Kurdish
Community Centre of Toronto (KCC). The relationship appears to be so close that it is often
unclear whether an activity being undertaken is the Organization's or the KCC's.
The close relationship between, and the joint activities undertaken by, the Organization and the
KCC is of concern to the CRA because of the KCC's overt support for the PKK and its leader
Abdullah Ocalan.
The Organization submits that its relationship with the KCC is minor and stems from the fact
that there is a small community of Kurds in Toronto. The Organization maintains that it does not,
and never has, sponsored the KCC, and that it sponsored the Kurdish Peace and Cultural
Festival, in furtherance of its mandate, 11 ••• to advance the knowledge and understanding of
Kurdish language, literature, art, theatre and cultural traditions. 11 The Organization submits that
this activity is acceptable under the CRA's Ethno-Cultural Policy, and that support for the Peace
and Cultural Festival was discontinued - not because the Organization believed the KCC to be a
supporter of the PKK, but because the Organization's Directors believed that their involvement
could pose at risk to their charitable status, as the KCC was engaging political figures in the
events. The Organization ceased sponsoring the festival as result of concerns over KCC's
partisanship and decided to undertake its own cultural and educational activities.
CRA's conclusion
The CRA does not accept that the Organization's representation that it could sponsor KCC's
festival without also endorsing, or otherwise financially supporting, the KCC. It is difficult to
separate an event from the entity that is holding the event. In essence, it is neither feasible nor
practical to support an event without also supporting the entity that has organized said event.
Regardless, expenses that the KCC incurred, for the purpose of the festival, were paid for by the
Organization.
12
When the Organization sponsored the festival, it was the ninth time the festival had been held.
Previous iterations of the festival appear to be similar to the one the Organization sponsored in
that the festival grounds were adorned with PKK flags. By virtue of there being a "small
community of Kurds in Toronto", and the presence of individuals associated with both the
Organization and the KCC, the Organization ought to have known that the KCC openly
promoted the PKK.
The CRA recognizes that the Organization does not appear to have sponsored the festival in
subsequent years. However, our concerns with regards to the Organization's relationship with the
KCC go beyond the sponsorship of, and participation in, the festival, and include the relationship
and apparent common leadership between the two organizations.
As detailed in our AFL, the CRA expressed concerns with respect to Mr. Dogan Dogan and his
apparent involvement with both the Organizations and the KCC. The Organization responded by
saying Mr. Dogan Dogan is no longer involved with the Organization.
The Organization also stated in its response that at the time of its Van Earthquake fundraiser it
did not have a phone. and that individuals who contacted the KCC seeking to donate were
directed to speak with the Organization's directors. Not only is this potentially misleading for
donors. but it serves to further demonstrate the close relationship between the Organization and
the KCC.
While we considered the Organization's representations that it is no longer associated with the
KCC, we note that there appears to be additional co-mingling of membership and leadership
between the two organizations. A recent article detailing the Organization's 2017 gift to Heyva
Sor Kurdistan (Kurdish Red Crescent Society) indicates that the Organization was represented by
Beritan Roghlat, 38 who, according to a 2013 article published by Rudaw, a Kurdish media
network, is the "secretary of the Toronto Kurdish Community Center." 39
Due to the provision of conflicting information from the Organization and its legal representative
regarding the status of the Organization's directors, the CRA's October 26, 2017, letter asked the
Organization to provide a current list of" ... directors, authorized representatives, and/or like
officials." The Organization's November 2, 2017, response failed to list Beritan Roghlat as an
authorized representative, despite publicly available information to suggest otherwise. Even the
2016 T30IO, which was received on May 3, 2018, did not list Beritan Roghlat as a director or a
representative.
For the reasons provided above, the Organization's response has not alleviated the concerns
expressed in the AFL. Consequently, it remains the CRA's position that the Organization has
ceased to comply with subsection 149 .1 ( 1) of the Act for its continued registration, and for this
reason there are grounds for the revocation of its charitable status pursuant to paragraph
168( 1)(b) of the Act.
38
http://hskurd.org/ar/2017 /04/ 1.l....iS-~ ji-u.,i_,IL..+t"'-e:'.-'_;-UL.,-J~l-17 /JI/
39
http://www.rudaw.net/mobile/english/world/11032013
13
c) CRA's position - Foreign Intermediaries - Mr. Atilla Firat - Scholarship Program
In its 2013-12-31 Registered Charity Information Return, (Fonn T3010), the Organization
indicated that it spent $3,000 on scholarships. In support of its reported activities, the
Organization provided documentation to the CRA, including a letter dated June 23, 2013,
wherein the Organization authorized Mr. Atilla Firat to act on its behalf in distributing the
scholarship money to students. Similarly, Schedule 2, Line 200, of the Organization's 2014-
12-31 Fonn T3010, reported that the Organization had provided $15,000 to Mr. Atilla .Firat
in Turkey. This is the same as the amount the Organization reported as 'Educational
sponsorship' on its "Statement of Operations" .
An analysis of the scholarship transfer documents provided by the Organization indicates

that Mr. Firat is closely associated with the Ban$ ve Demokrasi Partisi (BDP), a Turkish
political party. Research conducted by the CRA, and outlined in Appendix A of the AFL,
indicates that the BDP is closely aligned with, and pursues policies similar to, the PKK.
As detailed in Section 2.1.3 b), below, the Organization did not provide any documentation
with respect to how the scholarships were awarded, despite a request by the CRA. As a
result, the CRA is unable to determine whether the money sent to Turkey for scholarship
purposes was actually spent on activities intended to advance education in the charitable
sense.
The Organization acknowledges that Mr. Firat, an employee of People's Democracy Party
(HDP), 40 was involved in the disbursement of its resources for scholarship purposes in 2013
and 2014. The Organization represents that when Mr. Firat approached his personal friend.
the Organization's president, Mr. Adnan Kaya, about the scholarship program, he was a
member of Confederation of Public Workers' Unions (KESK). Mr. Firat asked for the
Organization ' s assistance in providing scholarships to the poor students who apply for
support from KESK. The Organization reviewed his proposal and agreed to run the
scholarship program as activities in suppmt of its 3rd and 4th objectives. The Organization
established terms and conditions for the program and gave Mr. Firat the authority to
administer funds on its behalf. The funds were transferred by Mr. Firat to the 20 students
who were identified as being in need of support in the monthly amount of $900. This
accounts for the $18.000 transferred over 2013 and 2014.
The Organization submits that its selection of Mr. Firat is clear and understandable as he is
an employee of the Turkish Parliament a member of a legal political party, and a personal
friend of the Organization's former president. The funds were spent for charitable activities
under the direction and control of the charity.
CRA's conclusion
As detailed in our AFL, the CRA's concerns regarding Mr. Firat and the Organization's
scholarship program are that the Organization:
40
The BOP ceased to exist in 2014. Following its dissolution, the BOP parliamentary caucus joined the HOP.
14
I) was not established to provide scholarships:
2) failed to conduct due diligence with respect to its intermediary;
3) selected an intermediary who belongs to a political party that has an apparent
association to the PKK; and
4) failed to produce documentation relating to the scholarship program in response to a
CRA request.
The Organization has failed to adequately address these concerns:
I) As discussed in Section 1.1, above, the Organization is not established to advance education;
engaging in the provision of scholarships does not support any of its stated objectives.
2) The Organization did not respond as to whether it conducted any kind of due diligence
exercise with respect to Mr. Firat prior to entering into the intermediary arrangement, but
noted that Mr. Fi rat was a close personal friend of its previous president, Mr. Adnan Kaya.
3) The Organization did not respond to the audit findings which indicated Mr. Firaf s
involvement with the BOP. Rather, the Organization simply represented that Mr. Fi rat is
currently an employee of the Turkish Parliament working with the HDP (Peoples'
Democracy Party).
4) The Organization's failure to provide the requested documentation in furtherance of its

scholarship program is addressed below.
As part of its initial response, the Organization advised that it had undertaken a scholarship
program in Turkey and had appointed Mr. Firat to act on their behalf. The Organization now
states that the scholarship program was in fact undertaken following a request from Mr. Firat
and the Confederation of Public Workers' Unions (KESK), that the Organization ..... help
with the many poor students that regularly apply for financial support from the KESK
organization." The Organization states that it reviewed Mr. Firafs proposal, decided to
participate in the scholarship program," ... established tern1s and conditions of the
scholarships ... and gave Mr. Firat the authority to act on their behalf in providing names of
eligible students and to administer the funds on behalf of ACF to those students chosen by
the President.''
The Organization failed to provide any supporting documentation pertaining to the request
from KESK and/or Mr. Firat to provide scholarships. If the CRA were to accept the
Organization's representations on this issue - that the scholarship program was undertaken
at the behest of KESK - it is not clear why the scholarship terms and conditions and
intennediary agreement did not refer to K ESK as its implementing pat1ner. Further, if we
are to take the Organization's statements regarding the scholarship program as accurate,
then it appears that the program itself was KESK' s program and not the Organization's, and
that, in effect, the Organization was simply acting as a conduit to fund the activities of a
foreign entity that was not a qualified donee.
15
The Organization submitted its scholarship terms and conditions as Appendix I of its
November 20, 2017, letter. Our review of the document suggests that it is still in draft form,
as it contains several "NTD", or "Note to Draft'', comments. 41 As the Organization failed to
provide any original records pertaining to the terms and conditions for the provision of
scholarships that should have been in place prior to commencing the program. it would
appear that the terms and conditions were drafted as an after the fact exercise in order to
respond to the concerns in the AFL. For example, Article 3 of the overview states that
"specific terms and conditions of the Scholarship will be contained in a letter sent to each
recipient of a Scholarship ... The Recipient will be required to review the terms and
conditions and communicate acceptance of the Scholarship in writing to ACF." The
Organization failed to provide any copies of signed agreements.
The Organization also failed to provide any supporting documentation to substantiate ho\v
the terms and conditions set out in the document would be applied toward the scholarship
recipients. For example, the Organization failed to provide any information as to how it
would determine whether the students were in financial need or enrolled in an eligible
institution. The document also suggests that scholarship recipients may be required to
participate in an internship with the Organization" ... or a related non-governmental
institution promoting Kurdish rights." No further infonnation was provided to indicate what
the 'internship' would involve or how the Organization would be "promoting Kurdish
rights" in a manner that would be considered charitable at law.
Regarding the transfer of resources to scholarship recipients, the Organization represented

that:
Funds were transferred to the students monthly through Mr. Firat. Although they
originally considered 30 plus students they were only able to fund 20 for one year
and only in the amount of $900 per month. This accounts for the total amounts
transferred to Mr. Firat over 2013 and 2014 - $18000.
Documents provided by the Organization in its Janumy I 2, 2015, submission contradict

these representations. In this regard, the Organization provided copies of the 2013 money
transfers from Mr. Firat to each of the scholarship recipients. These transfers amounted to
$3,000 CAD. Despite the Organization ·s representation that it only funded 20 recipients, the
transfer documents show that Mr. Firat actually funded 26 students. The document shows
the transfer of 5,757,60 Turkish Lira ($3,000 CAD) to 26 students broken into the following
payments: 19 students received 221.83 TL: 6 students received 220.40: I student 220.43 TL.
All of these payments occmTed during the period of December 17 to 19, 2013, suggesting
that rather making payments to the students on a monthly basis, as the Organization
indicated, the $3,000 CAD was disbursed to 26 individuals all at once.
The Organization appears to have transferred an additional $ I 5.000 to Mr. Fi rat in 2014, as
reported on its Form T3010 for the fiscal period ending 2014-12-31, but failed to provide
any additional information with respect to how. or to whom, these additional scholarship
funds were disbursed.
41
Numbers 5, 6, and 12, have [NTD: .. .. ] listed at the end of the comment.
16
Of the three representations made by the Organization on this issue, namely that:
• payments were made monthly to students;
• 20 students were funded;
• the financial amounts provided to the students;
all have been contradicted by the Organization's own documentation.
The Organization's response also failed to address audit findings that suggest Mr. Firat was
associated with the political party Ban~ ve Demokrasi Partisi (BOP). The Organization
failed to provide any representations as to whether they conducted any due diligence
activities with regard to Mr. Firat prior to providing the funding. Instead, it would appear
funds were provided based solely on his relationship with the Organization's president.
Our position remains unchanged for the following reasons:
• the audit was unable to verify the Organization's representations that it provided 20
students with $900 each during the 2013-2014 fiscal periods:
• the Organization provided insufficient and inconsistent information resulting in the
CID\ 's inability to verify whether the scholarship program was charitable in nature.
or even whether the scholarship program was the Organization· s own activity;
• the audit was unable to verify whether the students were eligible to receive
scholarships under the relief of poverty; and
• the Organization failed to address Mr. Firat's association with a political party that
appears to be closely aligned with and pursues policies similar to the PKK.
The audit is unable to determine ifresources were used in manner that is consistent with the
requirements for charitable registration. Consequently, the Organization has ceased to comply
with subsection 149.1(1) of the Act for its continued registration and for this reason there are
grounds for the revocation of its charitable status pursuant to paragraph 168( 1)(b) of the Act.
CRA's Position - Foreign Intermediaries - Bekir Kaya

At the request of Mr. Bekir Kaya, the Mayor ofVan, 42 Turkey, the Organization collected
donations to purchase the town of Van a fire truck. 43 As early as June 2012, media reports
indicated that Mr. Kaya, had been arrested for his alleged connection to the PKK. Despite Mr.
Kaya's arrest being prominently reported in the media, the Organization transferred funds for the
fire truck in July 2012 and had him enter into a donation agreement with the Organization. Our
concerns in this regard are heightened as the audit was unable to determine how the
Organization's resources were ultimately used.
The city of Van. Turkey, suffered a deadly earthquake in October and November 2011.
42Wan is the Kurdish name for Van, Turkey.

43When queried on how it came to the decision to purchase a fire truck for the City of Van, the CRA was informed on December
21, 2015, that the Organization asked the Mayor of Van what was needed and he said they needed a fire truck.
17
Shortly after the earthquake, the Organization engaged in a major fundraising effort and
press conference to assist the people of Van with then MP Jim Karygiannis. The
Organization was represented by its President Seyfi Tomar and Mr. Dogan who travelled to
the City of Van to meet with officials, including from the department of Fire and Rescue, to
determine the best use of the funds.
Mr. Bekir Kaya, the mayor of Van, was one of the elected officials that members of the
Organization met with in Van. The Organization represents that Mr. Kaya was a well-
respected public figure at the helm of the city at the epicenter of the earthquake. The fire
truck was requested because the city had a very old and poorly functioning fire fleet.
Temporary shelters - supplied by the government for the victims of the earthquake - were
flammable and resulted in many fires and deaths.
The Organization maintains that they had no knowledge of Mr. Kaya's alleged ties to the
PKK and that the government charged and jailed Mr. Kaya based on "alleged" connections
with the PKK.
The fire truck is the property of the Municipal government. The decision to provide the fire
truck was based solely on humanitarian concerns - aimed at saving lives. Then MP-Jim
Karygiannis was present when the Organization publicly transferred the truck to the
municipal Fire Department. He is prepared to speak on behalf of the organization - in
particular to attest to the fact that it was they who raised the money, purchased the truck in
accordance with the needs of the municipal government and delivered and transferred the
truck to the appropriate authorities.
CRA's Conclusion
The CRA's concerns in this regard are with a) Mr. Bekir Kaya's apparent links to the PKK, and
b) the lack of sufficient documentation to demonstrate that the Organization maintained direction
and control over its resources to allow the CRA to determine how the resources in question were
ultimately used.
The Organization represented that "[s]hortly after the earthquake, ACF was involved in a
major fundraising effort to assist the people of Van. Members of ACF participated in a press
conference with then MP Jim Karygiannis to begin the fundraising." In its response, the
Organization fails to note that the other party involved in the fundraising effort was the KCC,
which our AFL notes is known for its open support of the PKK and its leader, Abdullah Ocalan.
According to the information provided by the Organization during the audit, the fundraising was
done at the behest of Mr. Kaya and Mr. Nazmi Gur, a member of the Turkish Parliament with the
BDP. At the first press conference, referenced in the Organization's response, Mr. Dogan is
quoted as saying "Just before we arrive here today, this morning actually, we have talked to the
MP for the city of Van, who actually has visited Canada last year, Mr. Nazmi Gur, Honourable
Nazmi Gur. He has appealed to the Canadians for help."44 A second press conference, held by
the Organization and the KCC on October 30, 2011, again featured Mr. Kaya and Mr. Gur.
According to prepared remarks provided by the Organization, Mr. Dogan Dogan stated that, "In
44 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA- 70eH9AI
18
cooperation with the Toronto Kurdish Community & Information Centre, ACF and Honorable
Jim Karygiannis, MP Scarborough-Agincourt is holding this press conference to share our plight
with our community, summarize what we have done so far, learn what is needed and expected
from Canadians directly from Honorable Bekir Kaya, Mayor of Van and Honorable Nazmi Our,
MP, BDP, Van-Turkey."
As detailed in Mr. Dogan's Van earthquake press release, Mr. Our represents the BDP, and, as
per the CRA's AFL, the BDP appears to be closely aligned with, and pursues policies similar to,
the PKK. In addition, numerous media reports have indicated that Mr. Our is also a supporter of
the PKK. For example, both Mr. Kaya and Mr. Our attended the funeral of a PKK member in
2013. 45 At the funeral, Mr. Our praised PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan. 46 In 2014, Mr. Our
appeared on Ronahi TV and called for the removal of the PKK from the American and European
list of terrorist entities. 47
With respect to Mr. Kaya's apparent PKK links, the Organization did not dispute the CRA's
findings, but questioned the media source cited in the AFL. We note that source cited was one of
a number of media sources48 49 that detail Mr. Kaya's arrest in 2012 and then again in 2016, 50 for
his apparent connections to the PKK.
While the CRA has considered the Organization's representations and is sensitive to the
concerns the Organization has raised regarding the detention and imprisonment of Kurdish
officials, it is incumbent upon the Organization to demonstrate that it:
a) conducted its due diligence prior to transferring resources;

b) maintained direction and control over those resources; and
c) maintained books and records containing sufficient information to allow the CRA to
verify whether it is in compliance with the provisions of the Act and whether it continues
to qualify for registration as a charity.
From the documentation provided during the audit, and the information submitted in response to
the AFL, the Organization has not demonstrated that it has met these requirements.
a) The Organization did not dispute the audit findings that indicated Mr. Kaya's alleged
association with the PKK. The Organization represented that it was not aware of Mr.
Kaya's alleged links to the PKK. The Organization has not provided any information to
substantiate that it made any attempt to conduct any sort of due diligence on its
intermediaries and/or the individuals who were requesting donations from the
Organization.
45
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGwWtVRp2tY
46
http://t24.eom.tr/haber/bdpli-gur-yerel-secimden-sonra-ozerkligi-kutlayacagiz,234206
47
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYkpKXcBTNY
48
https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/2016/01/04/van-co-mayor-bekir-kaya-sentenced-to- I 5-years-in-prison-for-
being-member-of-pkk;
49
http://www.dw.com/en/turkish-police-detain-vans-pro-kurdish-mayor/a-36422827
50
www.wanhaber.com/bekir-kayaya-15-yil-hapsis-cezasi-202546h.htm
19
b) The Organization failed to provide sutlicient information to demonstrate that it
maintained control and direction over its resources. Specifically:
• No representations were provided to address the gaps in the sequencing of the
delivery and transactions related to the fire truck.
• No supporting documentation was provided to demonstrate the funds provided to
Garanti ltfaiye Araclari were used to purchase the fire truck.
• No representations were provided to as to why the donation agreements were not in
the name of the Organization.
c) The Organization failed to provide any additional records to substantiate that it

maintained control and direction over its resources.
For these reasons, our position remains unchanged. Consequently, the Organization has ceased to
comply with subsection 149.1(1) of the Act for its continued registration and for this reason there
are grounds for the revocation of its charitable status pursuant to paragraph 168(1 )(b) of the Act.
CRA 's position - Foreign Intermediaries - Faruk Tatli

The Organization collected several shipping containers worth of clothing and blankets for
people in need in refugee camps in Suruc, Turkey. As part of the audit. the Organization
provided shipping invoices for the containers it sent to Suruc, Turkey. The invoices listed
the recipient of the goods as a Mr. Faruk Tatli.
Our analysis of both the Organization' s records and publicly available information indicates
that ifs agent for this project, Mr. Tatli, is reportedly associated with political groups that
are affiliated with, and share the political objectives of, the PKK .
As outlined in Section 1.4 of the AFL, the Organization failed to provide any supporting
documentation to indicate how it maintained control and direction over these resources. In
addition, it is not evident how these goods were to be distributed and to whom.
The Organization submits that it organized the clothing donation campaign to send clothing
containers for people in need after the war in Syria began. The Suruc municipality was
chosen as the recipient of the containers because it was operating refugee camps for
refugees fleeing across the border from Kobane, Syria.
Mr. Faruk Tatli. the legal representative of Suruc municipality, was the main contact as he
was responsible for signing the receipts and contracts for the containers. The Organization
contends the decision to work with Mr Tatli was not political, but rather out of necessity
since he was the only person able to provide needed humanitarian aid the conflict zone.
Legally and officially, Mr. Tatli was the one to handle the clothing donations in Suruc and
distribute it among refugees. The Organization was not aware of any connection between
Mr. Tatli and the PKK.
20
CRA 's conclusion
The Organization did not dispute the audit findings \Vith respect to Mr. Tatli's alleged
association to various PKK affiliated groups. The Organizatjon represented that it was "'not
aware of any connection between Mr. Tatli and the PKK".
As detailed in our AFL and CRA guidance, CG-002, Canadian Registered Charities Carrying
Out Activities Outside of Canada:
Charities have to remember their obligations under Canada's anti-terrorism

legislation. As with all individuals and organizations in Canada, charities are
responsible for making sure that they do not operate in association with
individuals or groups that are engaged in terrorist activities, or that support
terrorist activities. 51
In its response, the Organization confirmed that it did not conduct any due diligence on Mr. Tatli
prior to engaging him as an intermediary. Instead, the Organization represented that "It lhc
decision to connect with Mr Tatli \Vas not political - he being the only person to connect
with to provide needed humanitarian aid in a conflict zone ... Legally and officially, Suruc
municipality and Mr. Tatli were those that could handle the clothing donations in Suruc and
distribute it among refugees'".
While \Ve have considered the Organization's representations that Mr. Tatli was the "only
person" they could use as an intermediary, absent any supporting documentation to
substantiate this claim, it is difficult to reconcile this position. For instance, in a crisis such
as the one wfoch unfolded in Syria at that time. there would have been a multitude of
humanitarian organizations operating on the ground. While we ackno"'·ledge that can-ying
on activities outside Canada ollen presents significant challenges for charities, as noted in
the CRA · s guidance CG-002, prior to engaging in such activities, a charity should consider
working with existing charities or other qualified donccs that have the experience and
capacity to carry on activities in a way that meets the requirements set out in this guidance.
If our concern rcgardi ng Mr. Tatl i's apparent connections to PKK-1 inked groups had been
an isolated i nci<lcnt within the audit. we may have accepted the Organization's
representations in the context of a compliance agreement. Hm,vevcr, gi vcn the pattern of tlrn
Organization's repeated connections to PKK affiliated organizations and individuals, as
identified throughout the audit, our position remains unchanged.
As \Ve have been unable to determine ,vhether the Organization· s resources were used in
manner that is consistent ,vith the requirements for charitable registration. it remains OLLr
vie,,· that the Organization has ceased to comply with the subsection 149.1 ( 1) of the Act for its
continued registration and for this reason there are grounds for revocation of its charitable status
pursuant to paragraph 168(1 )(b) of the Act.
51CRA Guidance - Canadian Registered Charities Carrying Out Activities Outside of Canada. hltp:!/www.cra-
c1rc.gc.cc1tch1ts-gvng.1ch1is/plcy/1:gd!tsd-cnd-eng.ht.mJ
21
1.3.2 Absence of due diligence
CRA's position
The audit found no evidence to suggest that the Organization made any efforts to investigate the
merits of any of its funding recipients and/or intermediaries. Our concerns in this regard are
heightened by the audit findings which suggest that key members of the Organization openly
support the PKK, calling into question whether the Organization had any real commitment to, or
intention of, undertaking any meaningful due diligence.
All registered charities are expected to take the necessary steps to ensure compliance with the
requirements for registration. As outlined above, due diligence measures are a matter of good
governance, that can, if conscientiously and genuinely implemented, serve to lessen the risk that
a charity's resources will be used in a manner that could result in revocation. It is apparent that
the Organization's directors failed to conduct any meaningful due diligence measures, and,
therefore, failed to ensure that the Organization met the requirements of the Act for its continued
registration.
The Organization maintains that in every instance it acted diligently - and compassionately -
in its efforts to provide aid to people in need as a result of natural disasters or their being in
combat zones. This includes in particular, the situation in Rojava. The Organization
maintains that its directors either personally knew people, or dealt with elected
representatives and/or de facto representatives where they had little choice if they were to
supply needed goods to refugees.
CRA's conclusion
The Organization did not dispute the audit findings that indicated it provided resources to various
organizations and individuals that were linked to, or openly supportive of, the PKK and/or armed
militia groups closely aligned with the PKK.
The Organization did not dispute the audit findings that it failed to conduct any meaningful due
diligence on any of its funding recipients/intermediaries. Instead, for each of the Organization's
foreign activities that the CRA had identified concerns with, the Organization's response was
that:
• it "was not aware of any connection between Mr. Tatli and the PKK";
• it "had no knowledge ofBekir Kaya's alleged ties to the PKK";
• Atila Firat was "a close personal friend" of its former president, Adnan Kaya; and
• Faruk Tatli was 'the only person to connect with to provide needed humanitarian aid in a
conflict zone".
While the Organization represents that it "acted diligently - and compassionately" in its efforts
to provide humanitarian assistance, it failed to provide any documentation to substantiate that it
had conducted any sort of due diligence when selecting intermediaries to engage in activities
outside of Canada. The Organization's representation that "[t]hey either personally knew
people, dealt with elected representatives, or de facto representatives where they had little
choice if they were to supply need goods to refugees", indicates that the Organization placed
22
little to no emphasis on ensuring that its resources were not used in a manner that would
contravene Canadian law and the Organization's requirements for ongoing registration under
the Act.
The audit found no evidence to suggest that the Organization made any efforts to
investigate the merits of any of its funding recipients and/or intermediaries. As noted in
our AFL, the concerns in this regard are heightened by the audit findings which suggest
that key members of the Organization openly support the PKK, calling into question
whether the Organization had any real commitment to, or intention of, undertaking any
meaningful due diligence. It is reasonable to conclude, based on the Organization's own
representations and the activities of it and its directors that the Organization should have
known the risks of operating with organizations closely associated with the PKK and how
doing so would be in contravention of its obligations under the Act.
requirements of the Act by contravening the requirement in subsection 149.1 ( 1) that its resources
be devoted to activities that are charitable in law. This constitutes sufficient reason to revoke the
Organization's status as a registered charity under paragraph 168(1)(b) of the Act.
1.4 Gifting to Non-Qualified Donees / Lack of Control and Direction Over Resources
CRA's position
Our audit findings indicate that the Organization failed to maintain control and direction over
resources gifted to non-qualified donees, both in Canada and Rojava.
a) Payment of services related to the Kurdish Peace and Cultural Festival
As noted in Section 1.3 .1 b) of the AFL, the Organization conducted activities in association
with, or on behalf of, the KCC. As part of the audit, the Organization provided receipts for
payment of services for the 2011 Kurdish Festival, held on August 28, 2011, at Earlscourt Park.
Publicly available information suggests that the Kurdish Festival is the activity of the KCC, and
not the Organization.
Our analysis of the receipts for expenses provided by the Organization indicates that many of the
invoices were made out to the KCC, and not the Organization. It appears as though the
Organization simply paid the invoices.
As such, it is our position that the Organization's payment of expenses incurred by the KCC, for
activities undertaken by the KCC, constitute gifts to a non-qualified donee.
The Kurdish Festival occurred in 2011 shortly after the Organization had received its charitable
registration, at a time when it had no office or formal administration.
23
The Organization maintains that Mr. Dogan Dogan - an active member at the time - was
involved in the Kurdish Festival early on, and that the Organization felt that by supporting the
festival it would be engaged in activities in support of its first objective. However, the
Organization did not sponsor the KCC. Rather, and like many other Kurdish organizations,
businesses and professionals, the Organization sponsored the Cultural Festival based on its
mandate to promote the Kurdish Culture, Folklore, and Music, as well as to celebrate the
contribution of the Kurdish people to Canadian society. The Organization's objective was never
to provide funding for any other reason.
CRA's conclusion
The Organization's representations have not alleviated our concern that it indirectly provided
resources to the KCC by covering expenses related to KCC activities. While the Organization
attempts to distinguish between the KCC and the Kurdish Festival, which is run by the KCC, we
are unable to accept the Organization's claim that its payment of expenses for the KCC was
simply the method by which it sponsored the festival.
We note that the invoices the Organization chose to pay on KCC's behalf were related to
garbage bin and toilet rentals, as well as a noise permit application. Further, it is not clear
how the festival would advance the Organization's 'mandate' with the presence of pro-PKK
paraphernalia and the apparent promotion of political groups. Therefore, we are unable to
accept the Organization's representations that these expenses are related to its own
charitable activities canied out in furtherance of its objective to:
• " ... advance the knowledge and understanding of Kurdish language, literature, art, theatre
and cultural traditions through conferences, workshops and seminars, and dissemination
of Information on topics related to the Kurdish language, literature, art, theatre and
cultural traditions through print and electronic media."
After considering the Organization's representations, it remains our position that by simply
paying invoices on behalf of the KCC, the Organization failed to demonstrate that it
maintained adequate direction and control over the resources it expended on this event, and
as a result was not in compliance with the Act in that it gifted resources to a non-qualified
donee, in direct contravention of subsection 149 .1 ( 1) of the Act, which requires registered
charities to devote all of their resources to charitable activities carried on by the organizations
themselves.
Consequently, it remains our position that the Organization has ceased to comply with
requirements of section 149 .1 (1) of the Act for its continued registration and for this reason there
are grounds for the revocation of its charitable status pursuant to paragraph 168(1 )(b) of the Act.
CRA's position - Gifts in Kind

b) Fire Truck
Our review of the documentation provided indicate:

1) The Organization's involvement with the donation of the fire truck is limited to the
money wire document.
24
2) The Organization was not in possession of these documents prior to delivering the
fire truck.
3) There are several large gaps between when the funds were sent overseas (July 13,
2012), when the fire truck was 'delivered' (November 2013), and when it was
registered (July 24, 2013).
4) The documentation provided by the Organization in support of this activity fails to
substantiate that it maintained control and direction over, and was fully accountable
for, the use of its resources.
In addition, as noted above in section 1.3 .1 c) of the AFL, the CRA has serious concerns
regarding the beneficiary selected for this project. As such, the CRA considers the transfer of
funds for the purchase of the fire truck as a gift to a non-qualified donee.
c) Clothing Donation
The CRA has concerns about the gifts-in-kind the Organization sent to Rojava, Syria, as the
violence, instability with respect to the political situation, and apparent presence of the PKK and
like-minded political parties and militant groups operating in the region make it difficult for
registered charities to ensure that the resources being sent to the region will be used for
legitimate charitable activities. Our concerns regarding the ongoing situation in Rojava, Syria,
are exacerbated by the apparent connection between the intermediary engaged by the
Organization, and groups associated with or otherwise linked to the PKK.
Audit findings indicate that the Organization's intermediaries in Syria appear to be associated or
ideologically aligned with Kurdish political organizations or terrorist groups. The Organization
has not demonstrated that it conducted any meaningful due diligence when selecting
intermediaries to carry out its activities outside of Canada. As a result, we cannot determine
whether the goods transferred were used for charitable purposes and it is our position that the
transfer of these goods does not qualify as a gift to a qualified donee.
In the absence of documentary evidence demonstrating direction and control, it is our

preliminary conclusion that the Organization has gifted its resources to non-qualified donees and
has operated in direct contravention to subsection 149.1(1) of the Act, which requires registered
charities to devote all of their resources to charitable activities carried on by the organizations
themselves.
Fire Truck
The Organization asserts that it provided sufficient documentation - the agency relationship
contract, and receipt of the fire truck by the city of Van. The Organization also notes that a
former Canadian MP, Mr. Jim Karyigiannis, was present at the ceremony where the truck was
handed over to the municipality, and that Mr Karygiannis would be available to attest to this fact.
The Organization also states that the existence of large gaps in the timeline surrounding the
donation of the fire truck is attributable to the complicated bureaucratic processes that needed to
be attended to, and the fact remains that the truck was purchased by the Organization and
delivered to the City of Van, Turkey.
25
Clothing Donation
The Organization maintains that its selection of Mr. Faruk Tatli, the legal representative of the
Suruc Municipality, was its only option, as Mr. Tatli was the only person to contact, and that he
was responsible for signing all the documents required to confirm receipt of the containers. The
use of Mr. Tatli was not a political choice, rather, the Organization had no alternative if it wished
to donate goods to the refugees in the area.
CRA's Conclusion:
Fire Truck
The CRA's concerns with respect to Mr. Kaya are a) his apparent links to the PKK and b)
the Organization did not provide sufficient documentation to demonstrate that it
maintained adequate direction and control over the use of its resources.
While the Organization submits that Mr. Karygiannis was present in Van at the time of the
transfer and can provide attestation if necessary, we did not contest Mr. Karygiannis·s
presence in Van. It is unclear as to what Mr. Karygiannis can attest to that would
demonstrate that the Organization had control and direction over this activity. No further
supporting documentation was provided to support this claim. Mr. Karygiannis is not
listed as an authorized representative of the Organization and as such would presumably
not be familiar with the books and records and business affairs of the Organization. 1f he
was involved with the Organization in some official capacity and docs have this
knowledge, it has not been reported. Simply attesting that a fire truck was presented to the
City of Van does not address the non-compliance concerns identified during the audit.
The Organization's response has not alleviated the concerns set out in the AFL. It remains
our position that:
1) The Organization failed to provide sufficient information to demonstrate that it

maintained control and direction over its resources. Specifically:
a. No representations were provided to address the gaps in the sequencing of the
delivery and transactions related to the fire truck.
b. No supporting documentation was provided to demonstrate the funds provided to
Garanti ltfaiye Araclari were used to purchase the fire truck.
c. No representations were provided to as to why the donation agreements were not
in the name of the Organization.
2) The Organization failed to provide any additional records to substantiate that it
maintained control and direction over its resources.
As noted in the CRA's guidance CG-002, transfers of gift in kind to non-qualified donees are
permitted in very limited circumstances as a matter of administrative tolerance. However,
charities wishing to avail themselves of this policy are responsible for makings sure that they do
not operate in association with individuals or groups that are engaged in terrorist activities or that
support terrorist activities. In this regard, the Organization did not dispute the audit findings that
indicate Mr. Kaya's alleged association with the PKK. The Organization was unable to provide
26
any information to substantiate that it made any attempt to conduct any sort of due diligence on
its intermediaries and/or the individuals who were requesting donations from the Organization.
Consequently, the CRA maintains its position that the transfer of funds for the purchase of
the fire lrnck constitutes a gift to a non"quaJified donee.
Clothing
The Organization did not dispute the audit findings and confim1ed that it did not conduct any
due diligence on Mr. Tatli prior to engaging him as an intermediary to accept the transfer of
resources. Jn this regard, the Organization stated that "ltJhc decision to connect with Mr Tatli
,vas not political - he being the only person to connect ,vith to provide needed humanitarian
aid in a conflict zone ... Legally and officially, Suruc municipality and Mr. Tatli ,vere those
that could handle the clothing donations in Suruc and distribute it among refogees".
V\.'hile we have considered the Organization·s representations that Mr. Tatli was the "only
person"' they could use as an intermediary, absent any suppo1iing documentation to
substantiate this claim. it is difficult to reconcile this position. It is reasonable to assume that
the Organization would have had more than one option to consider in order to provide
humanitarian aid in this region. As mentioned above in Section 1.3.1 c). the CRA
reco6mizcs that carrying on activities outside Canada often presents significant challenges
and prior to engaging in such activities. a charity should consider working w·ith existing
charities or other qualified donees that have the experience and capacity to carry on
activities. The Organization has not demonstrated that it considered any other method to
provide assistance, such as approaching another Canadian registered charity to assist in
carrying out its activities outside of Canada.
The CRA maintains its position that the transfer of clothing by the Organization
constitutes a gill to a non-qualified donec.
Consequently, the Organization has ceased to comply with subsection 149.1(1) of the Income
Tax Act for its continued registration and for this reason there are grounds for the revocation
of its charitable status pursuant to paragraph 168( l )(b) of the Act.
2. Failed to maintain and provide books and records as required
CRA's position
The audit identified a number of deficiencies with respect to the Organization· s books and
records for fiscal years 201 I. 2012, 201 3, and 2014. In some instances. the Organization
either did not maintain, or was unable to provide, books and records, and as such the CRA
,vas not able to veri1Y income, expenses, donations, and use of resources.
• The Organization acknowledges its books and records \'Vere inadequate during fiscal
years 201 1 and 2012 because it did not have adequate financial ad vice and accounting
serv1ces.
27
• While acknowledging its original T30 l Os were incomplete, the Organization contends
that it submitted con-ected T3010s and revised records to demonstrate how it spent its
money on the eaiihquake. The Organization agrees that it did not provide a detailed
description of each funding activity or associated expenses due to its inadequate
records. With respect to the scholarship program, the Organization represents that the
failure to provide the requested scholarship information was an oversight. The
Organization provided a copy terms and conditions of the scholarship program.
• Each of 54 original applicants of the scholarship were contacted directly by the
Organization·s president to determine eligibility and only 20 were selected to receive
money . The agent monitored the student over the year to ensure they continued to be
eligible for the scholarship.
• With respect to fiscal year 20 I 4. the Organization believes it provided the necessary
documentation for the events in 2014 in response to the audit request.
• Lastly, the Organization is in a far better position now to ensure that its books and
records are in keeping with CRA requirements.
Conclusion:
The Organization did not dispute the CRA 's assessment that the Organization failed to
maintain and provide records to allow the CRA to verify income, expenses, donations and
use of resources.
The Organization maintains that it provided either updated T30 I Os or the necessary
documentation. Specifically, the Organization represents that it provided:
a) Conected T30 l Os for 2011 and 2012 fiscal periods;
b) Account of expenses for the 2013 fiscal period;
c) Copy of the terms and conditions of its scholarship program; and
d) All necessary documentation for the events in 2014.
a) Contrary to the Organization ' s representations, our records indicate that the
Organization has not submitted revised T3010s for 2011 or 2012.
On January 13, 2015, the CRA received two faxes 52 from Mr. Amir Mohammadi, the
Organization's accountant, submitting new information on behalf of the Organization.
Both faxes had the same cover page indicating that the fax contained the following
information
• Updated donations list, and Donation receipts for 2013
• Student Scholarship and Power of attorney to Mr. Attila Firat
• Board Member's info
• Donation List and receipts for 2011 & 2012
• Completed T30 IO for 2011 & 2012
52
The first fax arrived at 12:06 and consisted of29 pages. The second fax arrived at 4: 19 and consisted of22 pages.
28
The T301 Os provided were incomplete. The information submitted by Mr. Mohammadi
included the frrst two pages of the previously filed 2011 and 2012 T3010s. A few
additional boxes were checked off and a description was included in section C ·Ongoing
Programs' However, there were no corrections or revisions to the financial information
provided with the original T301 Os.
b) The Organization maintains that it provided an account of its 2013 expenses. During the
audit, the CRA specifically requested details about its 2013 fundraising activities, and in
our APL, indicated that the Organization had not provided receipts.
The Organization did not provide details about the fundraising activities in 2013. The
Organization did provide some receipts for some apparent fundraising activities.
Invoices for ' Special events liability' insurance, ticket and brochure printing were
provided. However, as the Organization did not provide details about the fundraising
activities in 2013 it is not entirely clear if the receipts pertain to one or more fundraising
events in particular. Of the $11,486 listed in fundraising expense only $6420 were
provided. The CRA was unable to detem1ine how, and for what purpose, the remaining
expenses were incurred. As a result, the CRA is unable to determine if these payments
were made in order to advance a charitable purpose. ·
c) With respect to the scholarship program, the Organization acknowledged that it failed to
provide information on its scholarship program, and that this failure was the result of an
oversight.
The Organization provided a copy of the terms and conditions of its scholarship
agreement in Appendix 1 of its November 2017 representations. Our analysis of the
terms of conditions document, as detailed above in section 1.3 .1 c ), indicates that the
document is in draft form and does not appear to have been implemented. In addition,
despite acknowledging that it had not provided all the information requested, the
Organization failed to submit any additional information that could have served to
alleviate the CRA's concerns, or provided a greater understanding of the Organization's
scholarship program. For example, the Organization maintains that it had 54 original
applicants, but yet it failed to provide even a single application for the CRA's review. In
addition, the Organization failed to provide any information as to how the
Organization' s president contacted the students to determine eligibility or how the
Organization~s agent monitored the students "to ensure that they continued to be entitled
to the scholarship funds." 53
As the Organization' s failed to provide sufficient records on its scholarship program, the
CRA was unable to determine if the program was a) its own activity and b) whether it
met the required test under Education. As a result, the CRA has determined that the
scholarship program is not charitable.
53
The Organization's response dated November 20, 20 I 7
29
d) The Organization maintains that it provided the necessary documentation for fiscal year
2014. As detailed in our AFL, the Organization did not provide the infonnation
requested for events in 2014.
The Organization failed to provide any new infonnation to substantiate how the
Organization spent $2,701 on event expenses.
The Organization only selectively addressed a minority of the books and records concerns
addressed in the CR.A's AFL. The Organization was silent on the remainder the books and
records concerns identified by the CRA. As a result, the CRA was unable to verify the
Organization's income, expenses, donations, and the use of its resources. The following
items remain outstanding:
2011:
• The Organization failed to provide a general ledger and the bank statements
provided failed to reconcile to the T30 IO or financial statements submitted.
• The Organization failed to provide documentation to allow the CRA to assess
how it used the $IO 1.252, collected for the Van earthquake.
• The Organization failed to provide information on its fundraising activities and
invoices to allow the CRA to validate reported expenses .
2012
• Information provided to the CR.A with regard to the Organization's official
donation receipts did not reconcile with the amounts the Organization reported on
its T30 I 0.
• The Organization failed to provide supporting documents to substantiate $9,081
in expenses for events, as reported on its statement of operations.
2013 and 2014 Fundraising activities

• On October 8, 20 I 5, the CRA requested that the Organization:
"provide us with a detailed description of each fundraising activity it can-ied
out during the December 31 , 2012. 2013 and 2014 fiscal periods as well as a
breakdown of the expenses associated with each fundraising activity with
copies of invoices."
• The Organization responded on November 18. 2015:
·'We have not sold any tickets for our fundraising events. There were
donation boxes and we issued the donation receipts to the sponsors
(corporation and individuals).''
• No other information was provided . As a result the Organization failed to provide
supporting documentation to substantiate fundraising expenses of $11,486 for
··dinners/galas/concerts" in 20 I 3, and $2,701 in 2 I 04.
The requirement relating to the maintenance of books and records, and books of account, is
based on several court decisions, which have held, among other things, that:
30
• It is the responsibility of a registered charity to provide that its charitable status
should not be revoked. 54
• A registered charity must maintain, and make available to the CRA at the time
of an audit, meaningful books and records, regardless of its size or resources.
It is not sufficient to supply the required books and records at some later date. 55
• Paragraph 168( 1)(e) of the Act provides that the Minister may propose to
revoke registration of a charitable organization if it fails to comply with or
contravenes any of sections 230 to 231.5 and the Federal Court of Appeal
determined that non-compliance with section 230(2) is a proper basis upon
which the Minister may issue such a notice. 56
• The requirement to keep proper books and records is foundational and non-
compliance justifies revocation. 57
• Given the significant privileges that flows from registration under the Act as a
charitable organization, the Minister must be able to monitor the continuing
entitlement of the charitable organization to those privileges. In that regard,
the court agreed with the Minister that the obligation of a charitable
organization to maintain adequate books and records is foundational. 58
Despite having several opportunities throughout the audit process to provide the required
documentation, the Organization has failed to provide the CRA with sufficient and
meaningful records so as to allow the CRA to verify the Organization's activities and/or its
revenues and expenditures.
Consequently, it remains our view that, the Organization has failed to meet the requirements in
accordance with sections 230 to 231.5 of the Act, which constitutes sufficient grounds for the
Minister to revoke the Organization's charitable registration under paragraph 168(l)(e) of the
Act.
3. Issuing Receipts not in accordance with the Act
CRA's position
The audit revealed that the official donation receipts issued by the Organization did not fully
comply with the requirements of Regulation 3501(1) of the Act.
The Organization's receipts were missing:

• The address of the donor; and
• The place or locality where the receipt was issued.
54
See The Canadian Committee for the Tel Aviv Foundation v. Canada (2002 FCA 72)
55
See ibid. See also The Lord's Evangelical Church of Deliverance and Prayer of Toronto v. Canada, (2004) FCA 397).
56 Opportunities for the Disabled Foundation v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FCA 94;
57 Jaamiah Al U/oom Al Jslamiyyah Ontario v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FCA 49, paragraph 15
58 Humane Society ofCanada for the Protection ofAnimals and the Environment v. Canada (National Revenue), 2015 FCA 178,
paragraph 80.
31
The Organization submits that it has now corrected its receipts to include the missing
information.
CRA's conclusion
The Organization did not dispute the CRA's audit findings. It maintains that it has corrected its
official donation receipts. However, the Organization has not provided a copy of the revised
receipt for CRA's review. Therefore, the CR.A cannot accept the Organization's representations
on this issue.
It remains our position that, during the period under review, the Organization did not fully
comply with the requirements of Regulation 3501(1) of the Act. Consequently, there are grounds
to revoke the Organization registration under paragraph 168(l)(d) of the Act.
4.1 Errors/omissions on Form T3010, Registered Charity Information Return
CRA's position
The audit revealed that the Organization did not accurately complete its Form T301 Os for the
fiscal periods under audit, in that items reported were incorrectly identified. It is our position the
Organization has failed to comply with the Act by failing to file an accurate Form T3010.
The Organization acknowledges that there were errors and omissions on its Form T301 Os for
2011 and 2012 and submits that it has made best efforts to correct those with new filings.
CRA's conclusion
The Organization agreed with the CRA's assessment that its filings were incomplete or
inaccurate. The CRA has no record, to date, to indicate that the Organization had submitted
revised Form T3010s for the 2011-2012 fiscal periods. As detailed above, the Organization faxed
only the first two pages of its 2011 and 2012 Form T30I0s. The new Form T30I0s provided
were not complete. Our records indicate that only the first two pages of the previously filed 2011
and 2012 Form T3010s were provided. A few additional boxes were checked off and a
description was included in the 'Ongoing' programs section. However, there were no corrections
or revisions to the Form T3010 financial information. The CRA received same amount of pages
that was indicated sent on the cover page. This suggests that there was no attempt to provide
more than the first two pages of the Form T30I0s.
However, as these were relatively minor concerns in comparison to the larger non-compliance
issues as a whole, the CRA has decided not pursue this as a cause for revocation.
4.2 Late filing of form T3010, Registered Charity Information Return
CRA's position
Pursuant to subsection 149 .1 ( 14) of the Act, every "registered charity" must, within six months
after the end of the charity's fiscal period (taxation year), without notice or demand, file a Form
T3010, Registered Charity Information Return with the applicable schedules.
32
The Organization has not filed its Form T3010 within six months of its fiscal period ending as
summarized below:
Fiscal period end Due date Date filed

2011-12-31 2012-06-30 2012-08-09
2012-12-31 2013-06-30 2014-03-18
2013-12-31 2014-06-30 2014-12-09
2014-12-31 2015-06-30 2015-11-03
The Organization acknowledges the fact that they have always been late in filing their Form
TJO I 0. As noted previously, given the volunteer nature of the organization . .it has been
difficult to comply with this requirement.
The Organization will comply with the requirement in the future. Th e 2016 Form T30 l 0
will be filed this week.
Conclusion:
Despite the Organization's acknowledgment that it is continually late to file its Form T30 l Os
and its promise to file its 2016 From T3010, the CRA did not received the Organization's 2016
Form T 3010 return until May 3, 2018. A full six months after it had been promised. The
Organization's 2017 Form T3010 was due before July 1, 2018. To date, it has not been received
by the CRA.
33
Appendix B
ITR APPENDIX B
Section 149.1 Qualified Donees
149.1(2) Revocation of registration of charitable organization

The Minister may, in the manner described in section 168, revoke the registration of a charitable
organization for any reason described in subsection 168(1) or where the organization
(a) carries on a business that is not a related business of that charity;
(b) fails to expend in any taxation year, on charitable activities carried on by it and by way of
gifts made by it to qualified donees, amounts the total of which is at least equal to the
organization's disbursement quota for that year; or
(c) makes a disbursement by way of a gift, other than a gift made
(i) in the course of charitable activities carried on by it, or
(ii) to a donee that is a qualified donee at the time of the gift.
149.1(3) Revocation of registration of public foundation

The Minister may, in the manner described in section 168, revoke the registration of a public
foundation for any reason described in subsection 168(1) or where the foundation
(a) carries on a business that is not a related business of that charity;
foundation's disbursement quota for that year;
( b.1) makes a disbursement by way of a gift, other than a gift made

(ii) to a donee that is a qualified donee at the time of the gift;
(c) since June 1, 1950, acquired control of any corporation;
(d) since June 1, 1950, incurred debts, other than debts for current operating expenses, debts
incurred in connection with the purchase and sale of investments and debts incurred in the course
of administering charitable activities; or
(e) at any time within the 24 month period preceding the day on which notice is given to the
foundation by the Minister pursuant to subsection 168( 1) and at a time when the foundation was
a private foundation, took any action or failed to expend amounts such that the Minister was
entitled, pursuant to subsection 149 .1 (4 ), to revoke its registration as a private foundation.
149.1(4) Revocation of registration of private foundation
1
The Minister may, in the manner described in section 168, revoke the registration of a private
foundation for any reason described in subsection 168(1) or where the foundation
(a) carries on any business;
foundation's disbursement quota for that year;
(b.1) makes a disbursement by way of a gift, other than a gift made

(ii) to a donee that is a qualified donee at the time of the gift;
(c) has, in respect of a class of shares of the capital stock of a corporation, a divestment
obligation percentage at the end of any taxation year;
(d) since June l, 1950, incurred debts, other than debts for current operating expenses, debts
incurred in connection with the purchase and sale of investments and debts incurred in the course
of administering charitable activities.
149.1(4.1) Revocation of registration of registered charity

The Minister may, in the manner described in section 168, revoke the registration
(a) of a registered charity, if it has entered into a transaction (including a gift to another
registered charity) and it may reasonably be considered that a purpose of the transaction was to
avoid or unduly delay the expenditure of amounts on charitable activities;
(b) of a registered charity, if it may reasonably be considered that a purpose of entering into a
transaction (including the acceptance of a gift) with another registered charity to which
paragraph (a) applies was to assist the other registered charity in avoiding or unduly delaying the
expenditure of amounts on charitable activities;
(c) of a registered charity, if a false statement, within the meaning assigned by subsection
163 .2( l ), was made in circumstances amounting to culpable conduct, within the meaning
assigned by that subsection, in the furnishing of information for the purpose of obtaining
registration of the charity;
(d) of a registered charity, ifit has in a taxation year received a gift of property (other than a
designated gift) from another registered charity with which it does not deal at arm's length and it
has expended, before the end of the next taxation year, in addition to its disbursement quota for
each of those taxation years, an amount that is less than the fair market value of the property, on
charitable activities carried on by it or by way of gifts made to qualified donees with which it
deals at arm's length; and
(e) of a registered charity, if an ineligible individual is a director, trustee, officer or like official
of the charity, or controls or manages the charity, directly or indirectly, in any manner whatever.
2
Section 168:
Revocation of Registration of Certain Organizations and Associations
168(1) Notice of intention to revoke registration

The Minister may, by registered mail, give notice to a person described in any of paragraphs (a)
to (c) of the definition "qualified donee" in subsection 149 .1 (1) that the Minister proposes to
revoke its registration if the person
(a) applies to the Minister in writing for revocation of its registration;
(b) ceases to comply with the requirements of this Act for its registration;
(c) in the case of a registered charity or registered Canadian amateur athletic association, fails to
file an information return as and when required under this Act or a regulation;
(d) issues a receipt for a gift otherwise than in accordance with this Act and the regulations or
that contains false information;
(e) fails to comply with or contravenes any of sections 230 to 231.5; or
(f) in the case of a registered Canadian amateur athletic association, accepts a gift the granting of
which was expressly or implicitly conditional on the association making a gift to another person,
club, society or association.
168(2) Revocation of Registration

Where the Minister gives notice under subsection 168( 1) to a registered charity or to a registered
Canadian amateur athletic association,
(a) if the charity or association has applied to the Minister in writing for the revocation of its
registration, the Minister shall, forthwith after the mailing of the notice, publish a copy of the
notice in the Canada Gazette, and
(b) in any other case, the Minister may, after the expiration of 30 days from the day of mailing of
the notice, or after the expiration of such extended period from the day of mailing of the notice
as the Federal Court of Appeal or a judge of that Court, on application made at any time before
the determination of any appeal pursuant to subsection 172(3) from the giving of the notice, may
fix or allow, publish a copy of the notice in the Canada Gazette,
and on that publication of a copy of the notice, the registration of the charity or association is
revoked.
168(4) Objection to proposal or designation

A person may, on or before the day that is 90 days after the day on which the notice was mailed,
serve on the Minister a written notice of objection in the manner authorized by the Minister,
setting out the reasons for the objection and all the relevant facts, and the provisions of
subsections 165(1), (1.1) and (3) to (7) and sections 166, 166.1 and 166.2 apply, with any
3
modifications that the circumstances require, as if the notice were a notice of assessment made
under section 152, if
(a) in the case of a person that is or was registered as a registered charity or is an applicant for
such registration, it objects to a notice under any of subsections (I) and 149 .I (2) to (4.1 ), (6.3 ),
(22) and (23);
( b) in the case of a person that is or was registered as a registered Canadian amateur athletic
association or is an applicant for such registration, it objects to a notice under any of subsections
(1) and 149.1(4.2) and (22); or
(c) in the case of a person described in any of subparagraphs (a)(i) to (v) of the definition
"qualified donee" in subsection 149.1 (I), that is or was registered by the Minister as a qualified
donee or is an applicant for such registration, it objects to a notice under any of subsections ( 1)
and 149.1(4.3) and (22).
172(3) Appeal from refusal to register, revocation of registration, etc.

Where the Minister
(a) confirms a proposal or decision in respect of which a notice was issued under any of
subsections 149.1 (4.2) and (22) and 168(1) by the Minister, to a person that is or was registered
as a registered Canadian amateur athletic association or is an applicant for registration as a
registered Canadian amateur athletic association, or does not confirm or vacate that proposal or
decision within 90 days after service of a notice of objection by the person under subsection
168(4) in respect of that proposal or decision,
(a.1) confirms a proposal, decision or designation in respect of which a notice was issued by the
Minister to a person that is or was registered as a registered charity, or is an applicant for
registration as a registered charity, under any of subsections 149.1(2) to (4.1), (6.3), (22) and
(23) and 168(1), or does not confirm or vacate that proposal, decision or designation within 90
days after service of a notice of objection by the person under subsection 168(4) in respect of
that proposal, decision or designation,
(a. 2) confirms a proposal or decision in respect of which a notice was issued under any of
subsections 149.1(4.3), (22) and 168(1) by the Minister, to a person that is a person described in
any of subparagraphs (a)(i) to (v) of the definition "qualified donee" in subsection 149.1 (1) that
is or was registered by the Minister as a qualified donee or is an applicant for such registration,
or does not confirm or vacate that proposal or decision within 90 days after service of a notice of
objection by the person under subsection 168(4) in respect of that proposal or decision,
(b) refuses to accept for registration for the purposes of this Act any retirement savings plan,
( c) refuses to accept for registration for the purposes of this Act any profit sharing plan or
revokes the registration of such a plan,
(d) [Repealed, 2011, c. 24, s. 54-1
(e) refuses to accept for registration for the purposes of this Act an education savings plan,
4
(e. I) sends notice under subsection 146.1 ( 12.1) to a promoter that the Minister proposes to
revoke the registration of an education savings plan,
(f) refuses to register for the purposes of this Act any pension plan or gives notice under
subsection 147 .1 ( 11) to the administrator of a registered pension plan that the Minister proposes
to revoke its registration,
(f. I) refuses to accept an amendment to a registered pension plan,
(g) refuses to accept for registration for the purposes of this Act any retirement income fund,
(h) refuses to accept for registration for the purposes of this Act any pooled pension plan or gives
notice under subsection 147.5(24) to the administrator of a pooled registered pension plan that
the Minister proposes to revoke its registration, or
(i) refuses to accept an amendment to a pooled registered pension plan,
the person described in paragraph (a), (a.I) or (a.2), the applicant in a case described in
paragraph (b), (e) or (g), a trustee under the plan or an employer of employees who are
beneficiaries under the plan, in a case described in paragraph (c), the promoter in a case
described in paragraph (e.I), the administrator of the plan or an employer who participates in the
plan, in a case described in paragraph (f) or (f. I), or the administrator of the plan in a case
described in paragraph (h) or (i), may appeal from the Minister's decision, or from the giving of
the notice by the Minister, to the Federal Court of Appeal.
180(1) Appeals to Federal Court of Appeal

An appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal pursuant to subsection 172(3) may be instituted by
filing a notice of appeal in the Court within 30 days from
(a) the day on which the Minister notifies a person under subsection 165(3) of the Minister's
action in respect of a notice of objection filed under subsection 168(4 ),
(b) [Repealed, 2011, c. 24, s. 55]
(c) the mailing of notice to the administrator of the registered pension plan under subsection
147.1(11),
( c. I) the sending of a notice to a promoter of a registered education savings plan under
subsection 146.1(12.1),
(c.2) the mailing of notice to the administrator of the pooled registered pension plan under
subsection 147.5(24), or
(d) the time the decision of the Minister to refuse the application for acceptance of the
amendment to the registered pension plan or pooled registered pension plan was mailed, or
otherwise communicated in writing, by the Minister to any person,
as the case may be, or within such further time as the Court of Appeal or a judge thereof may,
either before or after the expiration of those 30 days, fix or allow.
5
Section 188: Revocation tax
188(1) Deemed year-end on notice of revocation

If on a particular day the Minister issues a notice of intention to revoke the registration of a
taxpayer as a registered charity under any of subsections 149.1(2) to (4.1) and 168(1) or it is
determined, under subsection 7(1) of the Charities Registration (Security In[ormation) Act, that a
certificate served in respect of the charity under subsection 5(1) of that Act is reasonable on the
basis of information and evidence available,
(a) the taxation year of the charity that would otherwise have included that day is deemed to end
at the end of that day;
(b) a new taxation year of the charity is deemed to begin immediately after that day; and
(c) for the purpose of determining the charity's fiscal period after that day, the charity is deemed
not to have established a fiscal period before that day.
188(1.1) Revocation tax

A charity referred to in subsection (I) is liable to a tax, for its taxation year that is deemed to
have ended, equal to the amount determined by the formula
A-B
where
A
is the total of all amounts, each of which is
(a) the fair market value of a property of the charity at the end of that taxation year,
(b) the amount of an appropriation (within the meaning assigned by subsection (2)) in respect of
a property transferred to another person in the 120-day period that ended at the end of that
taxation year, or
(c) the income of the charity for its winding-up period, including gifts received by the charity in
that period from any source and any income that would be computed under section 3 as if that
period were a taxation year; and
B
is the total of all amounts (other than the amount of an expenditure in respect of which a
deduction has been made in computing income for the winding-up period under paragraph (c) of
the description of A), each of which is
(a) a debt of the charity that is outstanding at the end of that taxation year,
6
(b) an expenditure made by the charity during the winding-up period on charitable activities
carried on by it, or
(c) an amount in respect of a property transferred by the charity during the winding-up period
and not later than the latter of one year from the end of the taxation year and the day, if any,
referred to in paragraph (1.2)(c), to a person that was at the time of the transfer an eligible donee
in respect of the charity, equal to the amount, if any, by which the fair market value of the
property, when transferred, exceeds the consideration given by the person for the transfer.
188(1.2) Winding-up period

In this Part, the winding-up period of a charity is the period that begins immediately after the day
on which the Minister issues a notice of intention to revoke the registration of a taxpayer as a
registered charity under any of subsections 149.1(2) to (4.1) and 168(1) (or, if earlier,
immediately after the day on which it is determined, under subsection 7(1) of the Charities
Registration (Security Information) Act, that a certificate served in respect of the charity under
subsection 5(1) of that Act is reasonable on the basis of information and evidence available), and
that ends on the day that is the latest of
(a) the day, if any, on which the charity files a return under subsection 189(6.1) for the taxation
year deemed by subsection (I) to have ended, but not later than the day on which the charity is
required to file that return,
(b) the day on which the Minister last issues a notice of assessment of tax payable under
subsection ( 1.1) for that taxation year by the charity, and
(c) if the charity has filed a notice of objection or appeal in respect of that assessment, the day on
which the Minister may take a collection action under section 225 .1 in respect of that tax
payable.
188(1.3) Eligible donee

In this Part, an eligible donee in respect of a particular charity is a registered charity
(a) of which more than 50% of the members of the board of directors or trustees of the registered
charity deal at arm's length with each member of the board of directors or trustees of the
particular charity;
(b) that is not the subject of a suspension under subsection 188.2(1);
(c) that has no unpaid liabilities under this Act or under the Excise Tax Act;
(d) that has filed all information returns required by subsection 149.1(14); and
(e) that is not the subject of a certificate under subsection 5(1) of the Charities Registration
G')ecurity Information) Act or, if it is the subject of such a certificate, the certificate has been
determined under subsection 7(1) of that Act not to be reasonable.
188(2) Shared liability - revocation tax
7
A person who, after the time that is 120 days before the end of the taxation year of a charity that
is deemed by subsection (1) to have ended, receives property from the charity, is jointly and
severally, or solidarily, liable with the charity for the tax payable under subsection (1.1) by the
charity for that taxation year for an amount not exceeding the total of all appropriations, each of
which is the amount by which the fair market value of such a property at the time it was so
received by the person exceeds the consideration given by the person in respect of the property.
188(2.1) Non-application of revocation tax

Subsections (1) and (1.1) do not apply to a charity in respect of a notice of intention to revoke
given under any of subsections 149 .1 (2) to (4.1) and 168(1) if the Minister abandons the
intention and so notifies the charity or if
(a) within the one-year period that begins immediately after the taxation year of the charity
otherwise deemed by subsection (1) to have ended, the Minister has registered the charity as a
charitable organization, private foundation or public foundation; and
(b) the charity has, before the time that the Minister has so registered the charity,
(i) paid all amounts, each of which is an amount for which the charity is liable under this
Act (other than subsection (I.I)) or the Excise Tax Act in respect of taxes, penalties and
interest, and
(ii) filed all information returns required by or under this Act to be filed on or before that
time.
188(3) Transfer of property tax

Where, as a result of a transaction or series of transactions, property owned by a registered
charity that is a charitable foundation and having a net value greater than 50% of the net asset
amount of the charitable foundation immediately before the transaction or series of transactions,
as the case may be, is transferred before the end of a taxation year, directly or indirectly, to one
or more charitable organizations and it may reasonably be considered that the main purpose of
the transfer is to effect a reduction in the disbursement quota of the foundation, the foundation
shall pay a tax under this Part for the year equal to the amount by which 25% of the net value of
that property determined as of the day of its transfer exceeds the total of all amounts each of
which is its tax payable under this subsection for a preceding taxation year in respect of the
transaction or series of transactions.
188(3.1) Non-application of subsection (3)
Subsection (3) does not apply to a transfer that is a gift to which subsection 188.1 (11) or (12)
applies
188(4) Transfer of property tax

If property has been transferred to a charitable organization in circumstances described in
subsection (3) and it may reasonably be considered that the organization acted in concert with a
8
charitable foundation for the purpose of reducing the disbursement quota of the foundation, the
organization is jointly and severally, or solidarily, liable with the foundation for the tax imposed
on the foundation by that subsection in an amount not exceeding the net value of the property.
188(5) Definitions
In this section,
"net asset amount"
« montant de l 'actif net »
"net asset amount" of a charitable foundation at any time means the amount determined by the
formula
A-B
where
A
is the fair market value at that time of all the property owned by the foundation at that time, and
B
is the total of all amounts each of which is the amount of a debt owing by or any other obligation
of the foundation at that time;
"net value"
« valeur nette »
"net value" of property owned by a charitable foundation, as of the day of its transfer, means the
amount determined by the formula
A-B
where
A
is the fair market value of the property on that day, and
B
is the amount of any consideration given to the foundation for the transfer.
189(6) Taxpayer to file return and pay tax

Every taxpayer who is liable to pay tax under this Part (except a charity that is liable to pay tax
under section 188( 1)) for a taxation year shall, on or before the day on or before which the
taxpayer is, or would be if tax were payable by the taxpayer under Part I for the year, required to
file a return of income or an information return under Part I for the year,
9
(a) file with the Minister a return for the year in prescribed form and containing prescribed
information, without notice or demand therefor;
(b) estimate in the return the amount of tax payable by the taxpayer under this Part for the year;
and
(c) pay to the Receiver General the amount of tax payable by the taxpayer under this Part for the
year.
189(6.1) Revoked charity to file returns

Every taxpayer who is liable to pay tax under subsection 188(1.1) for a taxation year shall, on or
before the day that is one year from the end of the taxation year, and without notice or demand,
(a) file with the Minister
(i) a return for the taxation year, in prescribed form and containing prescribed
information, and
(ii) both an information return and a public information return for the taxation year, each
in the form prescribed for the purpose of subsection 149 .1 (14 ); and
(b) estimate in the return referred to in subparagraph (a)(i) the amount of tax payable by the
taxpayer under subsection 188( 1.1) for the taxation year; and
(c) pay to the Receiver General the amount of tax payable by the taxpayer under subsection
188(1.1) for the taxation year.
189 (6.2) Reduction of revocation tax liability

If the Minister has, during the one-year period beginning immediately after the end of a taxation
year of a person, assessed the person in respect of the person's liability for tax under subsection
188( 1.1) for that taxation year, has not after that period reassessed the tax liability of the person,
and that liability exceeds $1,000, that liability is, at any particular time, reduced by the total of
(a) the amount, if any, by which
(i) the total of all amounts, each of which is an expenditure made by the charity, on
charitable activities carried on by it, before the particular time and during the period
(referred to in this subsection as the "post-assessment period") that begins immediately
after a notice of the latest such assessment was sent and ends at the end of the one-year
period
exceeds
(ii) the income of the charity for the post-assessment period, including gifts received by
the charity in that period from any source and any income that would be computed under
section 3 if that period were a taxation year, and
10
( b) all amounts, each of which is an amount, in respect of a property transferred by the charity
before the particular time and during the post-assessment period to a person that was at the time
of the transfer an eligible donee in respect of the charity, equal to the amount, if any, by which
the fair market value of the property, when transferred, exceeds the consideration given by the
person for the transfer.
189(6.3) Reduction of liability for penalties

If the Minister has assessed a particular person in respect of the particular person's liability for
penalties under section 188.1 for a taxation year, and that liability exceeds $1,000, that liability
is, at any particular time, reduced by the total of all amounts, each of which is an amount, in
respect of a property transferred by the particular person after the day on which the Minister first
assessed that liability and before the, particular time to another person that was at the time of the
transfer an eligible donee in respect of the particular person, equal to the amount, if any, by
which the fair market value of the property, when transferred, exceeds the total of
(a) the consideration given by the other person for the transfer, and
( b) the part of the amount in respect of the transfer that has resulted in a reduction of an amount
otherwise payable under subsection 188(1.1).
189 (7) Minister may assess

Without limiting the authority of the Minister to revoke the registration of a registered charity or
registered Canadian amateur athletic association, the Minister may also at any time assess a
taxpayer in respect of any amount that a taxpayer is liable to pay under this Part.
11
Appendix C
,1,..
I,I I
l+I Canada Revenue

Agency
Agence du revenu
du Canada
n;.
'I .
REGISTERED MAIL ij
!I,
Mr. Adnan Kaya BN#:844104265RR0001 i/ ,
. Director/President \\
Anatolia Cultural Foundation · File#: 3043592 , : . J:
,I
,, .'
308 - 3701 Chesswood Dr ,'
North York ON M3J 2P6 ii;
I
i° '
!: :
i :
August 2, 2017 i' .
, ; \ 1·;
. d: ;
·' I,
Subject: Audit of Anatolia Cultural Foundation :i'

ii'.
ii
Dear Mr. Kaya: if .
. ,,·
. !
.
This letter is further to our audit of the books and records of Anatolia Cultural :,
·Foundation (the Organization) by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The audit related :i. : I'
to the operations of the Organization for the period January 1, 2011, to :i:
. :1
December 31, 2014, inclusively. :i.
. Ii '
The CRA has now completed a review of the books and records and has identified
specific areas of non-compliance with core requirements of the Income Tax Act (the Act)
ii!
and its Regulations for maintaining charitable status in the following areas:
I
1/
I'
' !
Areas of non-compliance: .
.,
Issue .. Reference ii/
1. Ceased to comply with the requirements of 149.1(1), 168(1)(b)
the Act for its continued registration iJ: i
i :
2. Failed to comply with or contravened any of 230(2), 230(4)(a) & (b),
sections 230 to 231.5 of the Act 168(1)(e)
3. Issuing official donation receipts not in Reg. 3501(1), 168(l)(d)
accordance with the Act and/or its
Regulations ,'
149.1(14), 168(1)(c)
,:
:! ; ,I: . '
4 . . Failed to file an infonnation return as
Ii .
required under the Act. Late filing of form
T3010, Registered Charity Information ;i .
Return ; .
i!.
.
;J' '
j
;j'
'I
/j I 1;
Canada ~r1E{/l8J.
I:
i :
The purpose of this letter is to describe the areas of non-compliance identified by the
CRA during the course of the audit as they relate to the legislative and common law
requirements applicable to registered charities, and to provide the Organization with the
opportunity to address our concerns, provide any additional information regarding the
issues outlined in this letter, and submit a written representation, accompanied by any
relevant documentation, as to why the Organization's status as a registered charity should
not be revoked, or it should not be imposed a monetary penalty.
The balance of this letter describes the areas of nonpcompliance in further detail.
1.0 Ceased to comply with the requirements of the Act for its continued registration
(Paragraph 168(1)(b) of the Act) ·
Subsection 149 .1 (1) of the Act requires that a charitable organization devote all of its
resources to "charitable activities carried on by the organization itself." Generally
speaking, in order to maintain charitable registration, an organization must demonstrate
that it is constituted exclusively for charitable purposes, and that it devotes its resources
to its own charitable activities carried on in furtherance thereof. 1
As outlined by the Supreme Court of Canada in Vancouver Society ofImmigrant and

Visible Minority Women v. Minister ofNational Revenue, the determination as to whether
an organization qualifies as a charity under the Act is, in essence, a two-part test:
l. The purposes of the organization must be charitable, and must define the
scope of the activities engaged in by the organization; and
2. All of the organization's resources must be devoted to these activities.2
· The requirement that a charity's purposes be exclusively charitable was described as

follows in Vancouver Society:
It is not sufficient that the society should be instituted "mainly" or

"primarily" or "chiefly" for the purposes of science, literature or the fine arts.
It must be instituted "exclusively" for those purposes. The only qualification
- which, indeed, is not really a qualification at all - is that other purposes
which are merely incidental to the purposes of science and literature or the
fine arts, that is, merely a means to the fulfillment of those purposes, do not
deprive a society of the exemption. Once however, the other purposes cease
1 Vancouver Society ofImmigrant and Visible Minority Women v. Minister ofNational Revenue (Vancouver Sociery)
[1999] I S.C.R. 10, at para. 155-159.
2 Vancouver Society. ibid note 2, at para. 159. The only qualification relates to o.ther purposes which are merely
incidental to charitable pu,poses - better construed as activities in direct furtherance of a charitable purpose. The
organization will not fail to qualify as charitable because it described an activity os a pu,pose (see para. 158).
2
. ···---· ----· -- -- - · - -- - -- - - - - - , - - - -- -------;-r-;-,---,-,--~
to be merely incidental but become collateral; that is, cease to be a means to

an end, but become an end in themselves; that is, become additional purposes
of the society; then, whether they be main or subsidiary, whether they exist
jointly with or separately from the purposes of science, literature or the fine
arts, the society cannot claim the exemption.3
In addition, for an organization to be considered charitable under the Act, it must be

found to operate for public benefit. 4 At common law, the determination of the public
benefit requirement also involves the application of a two-part test:
1. The first part of the test generally requires that a tangible or objectively
measurable, and socially useful benefit be conferred.
2. The second part of the test requires the benefit be directed to the public or a
sufficient section of the public. This means a charity cannot have an eligible
beneficiary group that is negligible in size, or restrict eligible beneficiaries based
on criteria that are not justified by its charitable object(s); and provide an
unacceptable private benefit as it pursues a charitable purpose.
To summarize, the CRA must be satisfied that the purposes being pursued are charitable
at law, that there is a clear relationship and link between the activities and the purposes,
and that the activities themselves do not fall outside the bounds of what can be
considered charitable in the legal sense. In conducting this review, we take into account,
and draw reasonable inferences from, all of the relevant information that may be
available to us.
Finally, subsection 149.1(1) of the Act requires that a registered charity devote all of its
resources to charitable activities carried on by the organization itself. A registered
charity, therefore, can only use its resources (for example, funds, personnel, and
property) in two ways, whether inside or outside Canada: '
1. on activities undertaken by the organization itself, that is to say, on its own

activities (those which are directly under the charity's control and supervision
and for which it .is able to render itself fully accountable for the funds
expended); and
3 Vancouver Society, ibid note 2, at para. 156, where Mr. Justice Iacobucci, speaking for the majority, cited with
approval the comments of Denning L.J. in British launderers' Research Association v. Boro11gh ofHendon Rating
Authority, [1949) I K.B. 462, as applied by the Supreme Court of Canada in Guaranty Trust Co. ofCanada v. Minister
of National Revenue, [1967] S.C.R. 133.
4McGovern v. A.G., [1982] 3 All E.R. 439. See also Vancouver Society, ibid note 2 at para. 147 and CRA's Policy
Statement CPS-024, Guidelines for Registering a Charity: Meeting the Public Benefit Test, for more information about
public benefit
3
2. on gifts to qualified donees. 5
Our findings regarding the Organization's non-compliance with these requirements are
dealt with below under the headings:
1.1. Advancement of a separate, unstated purpose

1.2. Collateral non-charitable purpose ·
1.3. Political activities and activities contrary to Canadian public policy
1.3.1. Provision of funds to an organization whose resources may be used to
support the efforts of a political organization and an armed militant group
1.3.2. Lack of Due Diligence
1.4. Lack of Control and Direction/ Gifting to non-qualified donees
1.1 Advancement of a separate, unstated purpose
The courts have confirmed that in determining whether an organization qualifies for
registration, it is necessary to consider both the purposes for which it was established and
the nature of the activities carried on by the organization as a potential indicator of
whether it also operates for other unstated collateral purposes.
As noted above, the determination of whether an organisation qualifies as a charity is,

in essence, a two-part test. The question of whether an .organisation is constituted
exclusively for charitable purposes cannot be determined solely be reference to its stated
purposes, but must take into account the activities in which the organization currently
engaged:
In Guaranty Trust, supra at p. 144, this Court expressed the view that the
question of whether an organization was constituted exclusively for
charitable purposes cannot be determined solely by reference to the .
objects and purposes for which it was originally established. It is also
necessary to consider the nature of the activities presently carried on by
the organization as a potential indicator of whether it has since adopted
other purposes. In other words, as Lord Denning put it in Institution of
Mechanical Engineers V. Can, [ 1961 J A. C. 696 (H.L. ), at p. 723, the real
5 The term qualified donee is defined in subsection 149.1(1) of the Act See also Charity Connection No. 11 - January
2012 - Special Edition: Budget 2011. http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/chrts-gvng/chrts/cmmnctn/nwslttrs/cnnctn/cnnctn I I-

eng.html. Under the Act, a qualified donee is an organization that can issue official donation receipts for gifts that
individuals and corporations make to it, and that can receive gifts from registered charities. As of January I, 2012, most
qualified donees have to be listed and are subject to some new requirements. The following groups of organizations are
qualified donees: registered charities; registered Canadian amateur athletic associations; Her Majesty in right of Canada
or a province; the United Nations and its agencies; listed Canadian municipalities; listed municipal and public bodies
performing a function of government in Canada; listed prescribed universities outside Canada; listed charitable
organizations outside Canada that have received a gift from Her Majesty in right of Canada; and listed low-cost
housing corporations for the aged.
4
question is, "for what purpose is the Society at P.resent instituted? 6
Where an activity is, or becomes, a substantial focus of an organization, it may no longer

advance a stated purpose. Rather, the activity may be in support of a separate or collateral
unstated purpose - or form a separate or collateral purpose in and of itself. 7 An
organization is not permitted to pursue purposes that are not authorized by the terms of its
governing documents.
As stated in Vancouver Society of Immigrant and Visible Minority Women v Minister of

National Revenue:
It is not sufficient that the society should be instituted "mainly" or "primarily" or

"chiefly" for the purposes of science, literature or the fine arts. It must be instituted
"exclusively" for those purposes. The only qualification - which, indeed, is not really
a qualification at all - is that other purposes which are merely incidental to the
purposes of sciences and literature or the fine arts, that is, merely a means to the
fulfilment of those purposes, do not deprive a society of the exemption. Once
however, the other purposes cease to be merely incidental but become collateral; that
is, become additional purposes of the society; then, whether they be main or
subsidiary, whether they exist jointly with or separately from the purposes of science,
literature or the fine arts, the society cannot claim the exemption.
The Organization was incorporated with the following purposes:
1. For the benefit of the public, in particular persons of Kurdish race and origin, to
advance the knowledge and understanding of Kurdish language, literature, art,
theatre and cultural traditions through conferences, workshops and seminars, and
dissemination of information ·on topics related to the Kurdish language, literature,
art, theatre and cultural traditions through print and electronic media.
2. To establish and maintain for the benefit of the general public a library of books,
other forms of printed word, video and audio disks and other media for storing
information, all of these materials being related to Kurdish language, literature,
art, theatre and cultural traditions, to enable these materials to be accessed by the
public for study and other purposes connected to enabling members of the public
to deepen their knowledge Kurdish.language, literature, art, theatre and cultural
traditions.
6 Vancouver Society of Immigrant and Visible Minority Women v Minister ofNational Revenue [1999] 1 S.C.R. 10. See
also Guaranty Trust Company ofCanada v. Minister ofNational Revenue (1967] S.C.R. 133.
1 Vancouver Society of Immigrant and Visible Minority Women v Minister ofNational Revenue (1999] 1 S.C.R. 10., at
paragraph 156, where Mr. Justice Iacobucci, speaking for the majority, cite with approval the comments of Denning
L.J. in British launderers' Research Association v. Borough of Hendon Rafing Authority [1949] I K.B. 462 (C.A. at
pp. 467-68, as applied by the Supreme Court of Canada in Guaranty Trust Company ofCanada v. Minister ofNational
Revenue [1967] S.C.R. 133.
5
---------------------------------·-·
3. To relieve poverty, sickness and distress: a members of the community,

particularly those ofKurdisp race and origin who are resident in Ontario, by
providing such persons with advice, assistance, representation, counselling;
translating and interpreting services in matters of asylum, immigration, money
debts, welfare benefits, housing, health, education, training and employment.
4. To relieve poverty, sickness and distress by the provision of humanitarian aid.
5. To use, apply, give, devote, accumulate or distribute from time to time all or part
of the fund or funds of the corporation and/or the income therefrom, to or for any.
Charitable organization or charitable organizations registered as such under the
Income Tax Act (Canada), which, in the judgment of the directors of the
corporation, will promote the forgoing objects of the corporation.
As detailed below, the Organization has undertaken a scholarship program activity to

support students in Turkey. The Organization provided a June 23, 2013, letter in support
of its scholarship program that states:
Anatolia Cultural Foundation is currently engaged in Student Scholarship program

in Turkey, The main goal of this program is to provide financial support for students
in need; we hereby give authorization to Atilla Firat T.I.D 30629226314 to act on
behalf of Anatolia Cultural Foundation assisting with student scholarship Project
in Turkey.
The Organization also provided copies of receipts for money transfers to 20 recipients for
payment from Atilla Firat for Mardin Artuklu University, going to different students for a
total of CAD $3,000 or 5.757,60 Turkish Lira(TL).
Reviewing this activity and the Organization's purposes, it is apparent that the
scholarship program does not advance one of the Organization's stated purposes. There is
no purpose that explicitly allows the Organization to provide scholarships. As such, the
CRA considers the Organization to be advancing an unstated purpose.
As detailed above in section 1.1, the Organization was registered with the understanding
that it would be conducting activities in support of its charitable purposes.
An analysis of the activities actually being undertaken by the Organization, as outlined

below in section 1.3, appears to suggest a focus, not on relieving poverty or advancing
knowledge related to the Kurdish language, art, or literature, but on advancing and
promoting a political ideology associated with the Kurdistan's Worker's Party (PKK), an
organization listed a terrorist entity in Canada on December 10, 2002. 8 As detailed below,
8 www.publicsafotv.gc.ca
_ __ j
I'.
!i
~I I, r:
1·
1!
I I
·'
p I.
II I
i.
i Ii
1·
such activities regardless of whether they were ancillary and incidental would be 11 I:
considered an activity contrary to Canadian public policy and therefore not charitable.
,j ,.[,
· However, because such activities appear to have become the main focus of the
i'
f
1:
r
Organization, encapsulating most, if not all, of the Organization resources, it is the
CRA's preliminary position that the Organization may be advancing a collateral non-
charitable purpose.
11 I; I
.,I . /: I:
1.3 Political activities and activities contrary to Canadian public policy
;I l:
Providing resource~ to organizations operating in support of a political purpose, including I. I
the achievement of nationhood or political autonomy, are not recognized at law as
!; : I I
\ I i
charitable. In addition, it is well established that an organization will not be charitable at I
law if its activities are illegal or contrary to public policy. 9 i I;

I
,'
l:
In this regard, it is important to bear in mind that political purposes are evident, or can be
inferred, not only where an organization's activities support the aims of a particular ii 11 f !- I
!.
political party, but also where the programs and activities promote a political cause, J:
doctrine or ideology, or are directed at efforts to bring about or oppose changes in the law · ii I:
I:
or policy, or generally seek to advocate, and bring about changes in the overall way that a I I
society governs and manages itself. 10

:
.;
! ·r I
: :
I
i
I
Canada's public policy recognizes that depriving terrorist organizations of access to ,, · l:
funds is a fundamental tool in undennining terrorist activities as it weakens their 1 · i
supporting logistical and social infrastructures. 11 In this regard, it is very clear that I I
ii )
Canada's commitment to combating terrorism extends to preventing organizations with I
J: I: I
ties to terrorism from benefiting from the tax advantages of charitable registration.
Canada has implemented the binding elements of Resolution 1373 of the United Nations . .
i! . j,
i
I I
•:
Security Council and has ratified the United Nations International Convention for the · :: /;
,:
,.
I
i I
Suppression ofthe Financing of Terrorism. The preamble to the Convention recalls I 1 ·
General Assembly Resolution 51/210, which calls upon all States: J:

I,
·i I
l
i
. j. . I
3 (d) To investigate, when sufficient justification exists according to
national laws, and acting within their jurisdiction ... the abuse of
i!! I
F I
I
i
:1 :
I:
I
I
l
l
9 Summary Policy, CSP-P13. See Everywoman's Health Centre Society (/988) v. Canada (Minister ofNational
Reven11e) {1992] 2 F.C 52 and Canadian Magen David Adomfor Israel v. Canada (Minister of Revenue) 2002 FCA !1 J
323 !! I
I.
I·
I
1° For further infonnation, please refer to the CRA publication Policy Statement: Political Activities (CPS-022),
http://www.cra-iirc.gc.ca/ch11s-gvng/ch11s/plcv/cps·021·eng.htnil.
11 See "Harper Government Releases Air India Inquiry Action Plan: Roadmap to help ensure tenible and senseless ~ct
is never repeated." http://www.publicsafoty.gc.ca/mcdia/nr/2010/nr20 IO 1207-eng.\\Spx and ""Backgrounder: Terrorist

,,
., /:
!
I !
Financing." !illli://www.publicsafcty.ec.ca/m,:dia/nr/20 I0/nr20 IO 1207-3-..:ne:.nspx : I
! 1:
I
I
: 1· I .
:': .: I:
7 . !
I •
'I ' I .
l· ii
organizations, gr6ups or associations, including those with charitable,
social or cultural goals [emphasis added], by terrorists who use them as
a cover for their own activities; and
3 (f) to take steps to prevent, and counteract, through appropriate
domestic measures, the financing of terrorists and terrorist organizations,
whether such financing is direct or indirect through organizations
which also have or claim to have charitable, social or cultural goals
[emphasis added] ... 12
-Many of the policy and guidance statements for charities published on the CRA website
call attention to the need to observe Canada's laws and public policy in this regard. For
example, our publication entitled Canadian Registered Charities Carrying Out Activities
Outside ofCanada warns:
Charities have to remember their obligations under Canada's anti-

terrorism legislation. As with all individuals and organizations in
Canada, charities are responsible for making sure that they do not operate
in association with individuals or groups that are engaged in terrorist
activities, or that support terrorist activities. 13
The Kurdish Workers Party 14 (PKK) was listed as a terrorist entity under the Criminal
Code on December I 0, 2002, and remains listed today. Information pertaining to this
listing posted on the website of the Department of Public Safety provides the following
description. 15
Fomially established in Turkey in 1978 by Abdullah Ocalan, the

Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK / KADEK) is a Kurdish political party
whose main goal is the creation of an independent Kurdish state in
southeast Turkey and in northem Iraq, a region that is part of the .
traditional territory of the Kutdish people. To reach its goal, the PKK /
KADEK has led a campaign of guerrilla warfare and te1rnris1n, especially
in Turkey and in northern Iraq. Its activities include attacking the Turkish
military, diplomats and Turkish businesses at home and in some western
12
"Directly or indirectly": The question of what activities the funds provided were actually directed to, is not one that
is relevant to this determination. The provision of funds to an organization"'" regardless of the programming/services
being offered by that organization - linked to a terrorist entity renders the act contrary to public policy and thus not
charitable. Similar to the basis for the decision by the Government of Canada to list HAMAS and Hizballah in their
entirety (political, charitable, and military arms) . .
13
CRA Guidance -Canadian Registered Charities Carrying Out Activities Outside of Canada. http://www.cra-
arc.gc.ca/chrts-gvng/chrts/plcy/cgd/tsd-cnd-eng.html
14
Also known as: Kurdistan Workers Party, Partya Karkeren Kurdistan, Kurdistan Labor Party, Kurdistan
Freedom and Democracy Congress, KADEK, Kurdistan People's Congress, Kurdistan Halk Kongresi (KHK), People's
Congress of Kurdistan, Kongra-Gel
15 www.publicsafety.gc.ca
-I
8
II;
1/.:
I:
I.
I
I:
·1
I !
European cities. It has also been known to .bomb resorts and kidnap
I ,. ;
1
I
I. :. !
tourists in an attempt to destabilize tourism in Turkey. i.
I! i
Our analysis of information gathered from the 4ocumerits acquired during our audit of the
Organization, along with those obtained from open sources, has led the CRA to believe
-that the Organization, through its various funding and gifting arrangements, may have .i
· knowingly or unknowingly, extended the benefits ofits status as a registered charity to
fund the activities ofvarious organizations that are linked to or openly support the PKK 11 ;
'I
. and/or armed militia groups and political groups that are closely aligned with the PKK
(See Appendix A for background information).
1/ :
1.3.1 Support to organizations whose resources may be used to support the efforts of a I 1 :
poHtical organization, armed militant group. and/or a listed terrorist entity /i :

Ii :
. Our findings regarding the Organization's provision of resources and support to entities Ii i
111 :
that a~pear to operate in support of the PKK and related groups are _d etailed below.
IJ i
II :I
a) Rojava Media Project i !
b) Kurdish Community Centre I ;
c) Foreign Intermediaries. .
d) Key members of the Organization /1 :
1! i
ii:
i ! I
a) Rojava Media Project '.: I
l :!
: : I
i
Audit findings indicate that the Organization provided funding for Mr. Sardar i ; !I
Saadi and Mt; Massood Manaf of the Rojava Media Project (RMP) to travel to Rojava. I ;
The Organization classified this expense as ''research" under General & Administrative II' ;I :
I
I
I I
expenditures. It is not clear what research was being conducted on behalf of the ii; :
Organization and how it advances its charitable purposes. According to RMP's website, :I : Ii
I ;
the Organization is its main sponsor. 16

I
The RMP appears, on the surface, to be about providing young people with "media i' /r
, : I.
production equipment, training, and venues of publication."17 However, a review of the II :' 1,
RMP's online presence appears to suggest a political focus on raising "awareness about 1, i i
tire struggle ofthe Kurds in Rojava" and empowering "the young Kurds and other ethnic I '
groups, in Rojava to ·advance tl,eir struggles by creating their own media. 1118 .
I :_
i :
i i
Our analysis of the content produced by the RMP suggests an alternative political
·purpose. It seeks to "empower young people to write, document, and film their stories of j1 /
11 !
I':
16 www.rojavamediaproject.com
:I;
!1.
17 Resistance is Alive! Video, www.rojavamediaprojecLcom
18 https:/lweb.archjve.org/web/20140615055659/htto:// gofundme.com/rojavamediaproject Ii
II
. II I
1
,, !
i :
'I':
9 i' I
I
iI ; !
revolution and resistance ... [The RMP] seeks to provide a medium for making the voices
and vision of the people ofRojava heard around the world." 19 The RMP appears to be a
venue to promote Kurdish autonomy in the region, or at least the struggle to achieve it.
Our analysis of the videos produced by RMP suggests that they may be promoting and
glorifying the resistance by the PKK, the People's Protection Units (YPG), and the
°
Women's Protection Unit (YPJ). 2 For example, in the fifteen minute teaser for the video
Rojava Revolution: A culture ofresistance, there is a compilation of scenes from what
appears to be Sardar Saadi's trip to Rojava, as paid for by the Organization: The video
appears to promote the PKK and the revolution in Rojava by depicting the following
scenes:
• A visit to the martyr's cemetery ... "This is the grave of Martyr Seydo who lost
his life in Rojava... He is known to be a hero in the battlefield here in Rojave."
• A scene in which female and male soldiers appear to be honouring fallen
comrades whose coffins are draped with what appears to be YPG flags. A picture
of the PKK. leader Abdullah Ocalan hangs in the background.
• A scene in which people are preparing for a play, a man says "Now, we are
working on something for the celebrations of August 15th [an important
anniversary in the PKK' s history of struggle] .. ." "It is about today's situation and
what thugs [ISIS] are doing.... And how our comrades in the YPG and YPJ and
Asayis fighting them with a sacrificial spirit fighting against them to save our
honour."
• A scene in which people are practicing a musical performance for the August I 5th
celebration. A song starts "Here is the PKK raising, spreading all over the
mountains and meadows. The scene cuts to the live performance where a large
crowd is waving PKK and YPG flags.
• A student of the RMP is interviewed. She is quoted as saying, "I am taking part in
Rojava Media Project to learn about c~era and media production, and to
produce films on our times in this revolution."
Upon returning to Canada, the RMP held a fundraising event,2 1 entitled Resistance if
Alive: An Evening of Words and Images from Rojava, for the Organization on
November 1, 2014. A video of the event22 shows the event hall adorned with pictures of
soldiers. A few speakers appear to be promoting the Rojava Revolution and its political
implications. For example:
• Sardar Saadi, of the Rojva Media Project notes in the video: "I feel this is an
obligation because when people paying the price of resisting with their lives and
19 Resistance is Alive! Video, rojavamediaproject.com

20 See Appendix A for a description o f each of these groups.
11 Total fund raised: $2.469.65 - as per information provided by the charity.
22 Posted on!ine at rojavamediaproject.com
10
we have the privilege ofliving here. I think it is an obligation to do something, at
least in terms of making their voices heard."
• The RMP had a performance from Saye Sky, a rap artist, who is quoted as saying,
"Kurdistan and Kobane will not be defeated, let me go slowly, the soil is calling
me mother, you are calling me mother, we all belong to the soil." ·
• Another speaker Prof. Amir Hassanpour, "Our support for Ko bani and
unintelligible, we should look at it as part of a struggle, a worldwide struggle, for
the cause of freedom, independence, and a good life for the oppressed peoples of
the world, here and in Kobani."23
When Mr. Saa.di says the RMP seeks to provide a medium for making the voices and
vision of the people of Rojava h~ard, it appears that he is speaking of the voices and the
vision of those who are ideologicaily aligned with the PKK and/or the YPG/YPJ.
b) Kurdish Community Centre of Toronto
Documentation provided by the Organization as part of the audit, as well as a review of

open source material, suggests the Organization has a close relationship with the Kurdish
Community Centre (KCC) of Toronto. The relationship appears to be so close it is often
unclear whether or not the activity being undertaken is that of the Organization or the
K.CC. For example:
• Shortly after the earthquake in Van, Turkey, a fundraising campaign began. I .

· Numerous articles appeared online calling for support for the victims of the i.
earthquake:
o "Toronto Kurdish ·community organized #Van relief community. To send aid: j j ·
416 272 5619 I 416 938 0017 contact http://www.kurdishconmmnity.com"24 25
26 .
. i
oThe Toronto Star also published an article the Van earthquake and how people
could support the victims. It published the names of groups collecting
donations: "Private donations to the reliefeffort can b~ made through
Toronto-based Anatolian Cultural Foundation (416-938-0017) and the
Toronto Kurdish Community (416-272-5619). "27 The C;RA notes that the
phone number advertised as belonging to the Organization is the same as
KCC's phone nwnber. ·
• As detailed below in section 1.4, the Organization supported the activities of the KCC
by paying expenses related to the KCC's Kurdish Peace and Cultural Festival.
zi Resistance is Alive! Video, www .rojavail1edi~iprojecL.crnn ,

4
1 h1tps://n1lmsic.foccbook.com/11otcs/vanla-davan%C4%131%C5%9fma/for-international-dm1alions-to-van"
cm1hguake-ulu slarnrasi-bu%C4%9Fi%C5%9Flur-i%C3%A7in/ I8569-i3 l I 510216/
i.; https://yalnizdegilsinvan. wordpress.com/20 I I/10/23/for-foreign-donations'
l6 http s://erci sh ab~ r. word preS5. ccim/pagc/2/

11hltps://www.thcstar.com/news/world/2011/10/24/google helps track victims with missing persons app.html
11
· -- - - -- - - --- - - ---- -· ·
The close relationship and joint activities between the Organization iind the KCC is a
concern to the CRA because of the KCC's overt support for the PKK and its leader
AbduJJah OcaJan. The KCC's interior is adorned with PKK/Ocalan paraphernalia.
Ocalan's portrait hangs from the ceiling on one side opposite to the PKK flag. 28
The KCC's social media accounts, like its centre, appear to be used to promote the cause ·
of Ocalan and the PKK: 29
• The KCC promoted a party being held for "Serok's30 birthday''. 31 The tweet is
dated April 4, 2013, the same day as Ocalan' s birthday3 2 and contains a photo of a
birthday cake with Ocalan's picture.
• On April 25, 2015, the KCC held an educational lecture about The Vision of
Abdullah Ocalan.33 The Facebook post goes on describe Abdullah Ocalan in
glowing terms. 34
• On March 13, 2015, the KCC shared a link to a press release stating Syriac
Military Council and YPG in Ta! Tamer Need Urgent Line of Defence Against
/S/S.3s .
• On February 15, 2013, KCC posted a photo of a banner titled "Black Day -
02.15 .1999". The banner contains a photo of Ocalan and appears to be referencing
the day when he was arrested. The banner is part of an apparent KCC
demonstration in front of the Turkish embassy to protest "the illegal capture of
Abdullah Ocalan! That happened 14 years ago."36
Furthermore, the address of the KCC, 1290 Finch Ave. West, Toronto, appears to be the
nexus of Kurdish groups in the Greater Toronto Area that support and promote Ocalan
and/or the PKK. The CRA has identified several Kurdish organizations which also appear
to operate out of 1290 Finch Ave.
• Kurdish Community Centre
• Democratic Kurdish Youth Committee (DKYC)37 38
28 https://twitter.com/torontokurdcc 26 April, 2013.

29 https://twitter.com/torontokurdcc 9 April 2013, 4 April 2013,
Jo Serok is translated to leader/president
JI https://twitter.com/torontokurdcc 4 April 2013, 3 April 2013
iz "Abdullah Ocalan". Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., 2007
n https://www.facebook.com/KurdishCommunity?fref=nf
34 The Vision of Abdullah Ocalan, the leader of the Kurdish Liberation Struggle in "Northern Kurdistan; the mastermind
behind the Rojava (Western Kurdistan) Revolution; an architect of a gender equal democratic confoderal system of
justice; an engineer ofan ecologically responsibility liberated Kurdish profile who can stand up to injustice, d,:ties
oppression and dictatorship ... Ocalan, internationally recognized strong, foarless and brilliant leader with a vision that
could change the entire Middle East.
35 https://www.facebook.com/KurdishCornmunity?fre~nf
6
J .https;//twitter.com/torontokurdcc
7
J The mission of Democratic Kurdish Youth Commission (DKYC) is to unite Kurdish youth from Toronto and the
GT A for social, cultural and educational events.
38 www.facebook.com/Democratic-Kurdish-Youth-Coinmission-1531128497165983/infofltab=overview
12
ii.:i ,I;~
'I
1. I
1
·1 . ;
:I Ii" '11
i ! : :I
!i. : )
o The DKYC also appears to promote and support the PKK/Ocalan vision.39
• Toronto Patriotic Revolutionary Youth Movement (TPRYM)40 I! !
o The TPRYM social media appears to focus, aside from soccer, on I :I! : !
promoting Abdullah Ocalan,41 the PK.K,42 and the revolution. 43 I I' i .
J'_ i I
c) Foreign Intermediaries ;i '( '1·

i·i 1·
Audit fmdings reveal the Organization entered into funding and gifting arrangements I '
.. 'I'I
ii'
with intermediaries outside of Canada during the period under review.
:1
I. !
• Mr. Bekir Kaya-the Mayor of Van, Turkey-was-listed as the recipient of a fire
truck.
• Mr. Atilla Firat- appointed by the Organization to distribute schoiarships.
• Mr. Faruk Tatli - appointed by the Organizationto distribute clothing and
i I 'i:
blankets. j/ - i .
'I -
I
i ' 'i: . I I
Our review indicates that all thtee intemi.ediaries have connections to the PKK, or 1t J( !1' j
political groups associated with the PKK
l11· ; 1
:• 11 '
Mr. Bekir Kaya - tl,e Mayor of Van i l1'; 'I 1
I
· At the request of the Mayor of Van, the Organization collected donations to purchase the :1
·1
·
I
town of.Van a fire truck. 44 Our analysis of the Organizatiqn's records and open source
information indicates that the recipient of the fire truck, Mr. Bekir Kaya- the Mayor of
Van, reportedly· has ties to the PKK. Furthermore, as detailed in section 1.4, the
:I. :
documentation provided by the Organization was insufficient to demonstrate that the
Orgruiization maintained direction and control over this activity or that the funds I :1:
39
11- i i j
I
I) On February I I, 2015, the DKYC posted a photo oh Facebook of people holding a PKK flag, flags with Ocalan's
image, and a banner saying 'Freedom for Ocalan - Je suis Ocalan'. Source:
hitps;//www. facebook.cam/1531128497165983/photos/a.1545993292346170. !073741831.1531128497165983/J 54599
I I
1769012989/?tvpe=J&thcatcr ·
2) On June 14, 2015, the DKYC posted a photo on Face book of an event with posters of Ocalan and flags of the PKK i. t I'°
in the background. Source:
https://www.focebaob:om/l 53 I 128497165983/photos/a.1545993292346170.1073741831.15311 28497165983/l 6.5401 I i l_ .·_· .
J411544157ntyp¢=3&theatcr . . . 1:
40
hllps://yellow.place/en/!oronto•patriotic-revolutionary-youth-movement-toronto-canada and
htfps://www.facebook.com/Toronto-patriotic-revolutionary-youth-movement-1531128497165983/
41
- On May 3, 2016, a vide<> was posted featuring Abdullah Ocalan. https://www.facebook.com/TorontQ:patriotic-
revoluuonary-youth-movement-1531128497165983/
42 On April 30, 20 J6, an event was posted with the description "Check out this movie screening about the ladies of the
PKK! The movie is playing Tuesday, Wednesday and Sunday!" https://www.facebook.com/Toronto-patr:iotic-

revol utionary-youth-moyement-1531 I 28497165983/
41 A post from May 6, 2016, features ofa picture of three men with a caption "Our revolutionary martyrs will never ii I
die." https://www.facebook.comfforonto-patriotic-revolutionary-youth-movement-1531128497165983/ · ii j.
I
~ When queried on how it came to the decision to purchase a fire truck for the City of Van, the CRA was infonned on
4 I
[ 11
December 21, 2015, that the Organization asked lhe Mayor of Van what was, necded and he said they needed a fire
truck.
:I ! .
,,J '
! '
iI -
,I
13 l I!
I'
•I -
! t
J 11
transferred by the Organization to purchase the fire truck were used for the purpose
intended.
i
As early as June 2012, media reports indicated that the Mayor Van, Mr. Bekir Kaya. was
arrested in relation to his alleged connection to the PKK.45 Despite Mr. Kaya's arrest
being prominently reported in the media, the Organization transferred the funds for the
fire truck in July 2012. Our concerns regarding the potential misuse of the fire truck and
Mr; Kaya's apparent connection to the PKK is reinforced by the fact that Mr. Kaya was
released from prison in 201346 and signed the donation authorization agreement on May
20, 2013.47 The Organization has stated that the fire truck remains in possession of the
City of Van. Since then Mr. Kaya was arrested again for his continued involvement with
the PKK, and as such our concerns have not been a\leviated.48 The audit was unable to
determine how the Organization's resources were ultimately used.
Mr. Atilla Firat- Scholars/1ip Progam

On its 2013-12-31 T3010, the Organization indicated that it spent $3,000 on scholarships.
In support of its scholarship activities, the Organization provided documentation to the
CRA. This included a June 23, 2013, letter whereby the Organization authorized Mr.
Atilla Firat to act on its behalf to distribute the scholarship money to students.
The CRA would also like to note that the Organization appears to have provided an
additional amount to Mr. Atilla Firat in the fiscal period ending December 31, 2014. The
Organization's 2014-12-31 T30IO, Schedule 2, line 200 reported $15,000 to Mr. Atilla
Firat in Turkey which equals the amount reported as 'Educational sponsorship' on its
"Statement of Operations". -
The CRA received copies of receipts for money transfers to 20 recipients for payment
from Mr. Atilla Firat going to different students for a total of CAD $3,000 or 5. 757,60
Turkish Lira (TL). The money transfer listed the following contact information as the
recipient: 49
45
A Kurdish mayor was accused of belonging to an armed separatist group and detained by a Turkish court, television
channels reported on Sunday, in the latest sign of a crackdown on Kurdish politicians and activists, Reuters reported.
Bekir Kaya, the mayor of the Kurdish city of Van in southeastern Turkey (Northern Kurdistan), and two provincial
leaders in the pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) were remanded in custody pending trial late on Saturday,
CNN Turk said ... The arrests were the latest carried out during an investigation into the Union of Kurdistan
Communities (KCK), which Turkish authorities say is the urban wing of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). Source:
http://ekurd.net/mismas/articles/misc20 I 2/6/turkey3965:htm
46 http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2016/0 I/04/444505/Kurdish-Turkey-V an-PKK-Kaya
u This appears to be consistent with the Organization's records as Mr. Kaya signed the donation authorization on May
20, 2013.
18
A co-mayor of the city of Van in Turkey's Kurdish-majority region has been sentenced to 15 years in prison on
charges of having links with the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). On Monday, a court in Van found Bekir Kaya guilty
of being a member of the PKK militant group's urban wing, the Group of Communities in Kurdistan (KCK), Anatolia
news agency said .... [Bckir] Kaya, 38, was jailed in 2012 over the PKK's role in Van. He was released in 2013.
Source: http://www_presstv.com/Detail/2016/0 I/04/444505/Kurdish-Turkey-V an-PKK-Ka,ya
6
Scholarship transfer reports, provided by the Organization Janulll)' 12, 2015.
14
I· I:
I I
I I..
1
i
Atilla FIRAT, TBMM Ana Bina BOP Grubu, Ankara, TURKEY
GSM: +90 532 407 8665, Tel:+90 312 420 82 41, Fax: +90 '312 420 5310,
e-mail:[email protected] i; I ,
An analysis of the recipient information indicates that Mr. Firat is closely associated with
the political party Ban~ ve Demokrasi Partisi (BOP) or the Peace and Democracy Party :1
as it is known in English. The "TBMM Ana Bina BDP Grubu" listed as the recipient's
address appears to stand for Tiirkiye Bilyiik Millet Medisi Ana Bina BDP Grubu. This
translates to the 'main building of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey BDP group'.
Furthermore, the contact email, with the initials 'BOP' in its address, suggests a close
affinity for the BOP.
Research conducted by the CRA, as detailed in Appendix A, indicates that the BDP is
i•
closely aligned with and pursues policies similar to the PKK.. · I
I , ,
I
I
As detailed below in section 2.1.3 b), the Organization did not provide any of the ' I
documentation requested by the CRA as to how the scholarships were awarded. As such,
the CRA is unable to verify whether the money sent to Turkey for scholarship purposes
was actually spent advancing education in the charitable sense.
I I
Mr. Faruk Tatli - recipient/or clot/ting and blankets
The Organization collected several shipping containers worth of clothing and blankets. 50
As part of the audit, the Organization provided shipping invoices for its containers sent to
Suruc, Turkey. The invoices listed the recipient of the goods as:
Mr. Faruk Tatli

Dikili Mahallesi, Ataturk Bulvari
Suruc, Sanliurfa, Turkey
Our analysis of the Organization's records and open source information indicates that it's
agent for this project, Mr. Tatli, is reportedly associated with political groups that are
affiliated and share political objectives with the PKK..
I I
'
51 i
Media reports describe Mr. Tatli as the head of Suruc Municipality and the International
I
coordinator for Rojava. Rojava is a Kurdish enclave in northern Syria that was
established "under the leading role of the PYO" [Democratic Union Party] after it
declared autonomy from Damascus in 2013. As detailed in Appendix A, the PYO is a !
10 The Organization provided documentation outlining three shipments of clothing, blankets, socks, hats, scarves, etc. I ''
The first shipment left 11/26/2014 and contained over 15,875 kgs of items. The second shipment left on 12/11/2014
and contained over 13,600 kgs of items. The third shipment left on 12/24/2014 and contained over 15,875 kgs.
st http://www.middleeasteye.net/in-depth/features/tent-cities-gas-canisters-and-anger-turkish-syrian-border-
2094319416
15
"Syrian affiliate of the militant Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK)"52 and is the political
arm of the People's Defence Units (YPG). 53 . ·
Furthermore, as detailed below, Mr. Tatli is a member of various groups that appear to
promote the cause of the PKK. Lastly, a review of Mr. Tatli's Twitter account appears to
suggest that Mr. Tatli may be supportive of the PKK as he tweeted a photo of what
appears to be a memorial display adorned ·with PKK flags. 54
As outlined in section 1.4, the Organization failed to provide any supporting

documentation to indicate how it maintained control and direction over these resources.
In addition, it is not evident how these goods were to be distributed and to whom.
d) Key members of the Organization
Open source information indicates that several members of the Organization who were
responsible for making key decisions, have publically supported the PKK. -
Mr. Adnan Kaya, the Organization's President, appears to have at least two Twitter
accounts: @AKaya41 and @adnankaya84. Mr. Kaya is a prolific user of social media.
An analysis of these tweeter feeds suggests that Mr. Kaya openly supports the PKK, its
leader Abdullah Ocalan, and its associated military groups the YPG and YPJ. For
example, Mr. Kaya, tweeted "#PKK is the hope for humanity" and "#Delist the PKK" on
February 6, 2015. 55 On October 9, 2014, Mr. Kaya tweeted his support for the YPG and
YPJ say "#YPG and #YPJ is fighting for humanity."56 These are just a few of the
examples of Mr. Kaya's overt support for the PKK, YPG, and YPJ on social media.
Mr. Dogan Dogan, describes himself as the Co-President/Founding Board Member of the
Organization on his Linkedln page. 57 Documentation submitted by the Organization
reveals that many of the Organization's expenses are in the name of Mr. Dogan. In
· addition, Mr. Dogan appears to have signing authority on the Organization's bank
accounts as he co-signed many of the cheques issued for the re-imbursement of the
expenses he incurred. Mr. Dogan also signed, on behalf of the Organization, donation
receipts and a wire transfer in 2012.
Mr. Dogan goes by the Twitter handle of@DonaldDogan. Within this Twitter account,
Mr. Dogan describes himself as a "Political Activist; Defending Human Rights and Life
52 http://camegie-mec.org/diwan/48526?1ang=en
53 httn://www.glohalsecurity.org/militarv/world/para/ypg.htm
s4 https://twitter.com/faruktatli
ss httos://twitter.com/AKayo41
56 https://twitter.com/AKava4 I
57 https://ca.linkedin.com/in/dogan-donalcl-dogan-14b09a 11
16
------- - ------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - , - - ~ - -
II
i:'. I :,-_
I
with Dignity, Fights against Turkish Fascism! Supports Kurdish Freedom Mo'vement!" 58 -
A sampling of tweets suggests that Mr. Dogan is openly supportive of the 'Kurdish
Freedom Movement' often retweeting messages with the hashtag #PKK. On May 9, i'
1016, he retweeted the user @Nadyac.is \ who tweetetl "A\ways and Forever Support
#PKK".s9 ;i
In addition, Mr. Dogan appears to be associated with the KCC, which as detailed above
I
I
appears to be supportive of the PKK and its leader Ocalan. Mr. Dogan publicly invited I'I
the community to a breakfast at the KCC followed by a commemoration ceremony for !'
the Marash60 and Roboski Massacres 61 ."62
In light of the audit findings that indicate the Organization provided resources to !
intermediaries that appear to be linked to militia groups and political groups associated
with the PKK, we find it concerning that two key decision makers for the Organization
publicly support the PKK.
1.3.2 Absence of Due Diligence
By virtue of their unique role, and as a means of "encouraging activities which are of
special benefit to the community, "63 registered charities receive privileged treatment
under the Act. In addition to the income tax exemption that is also granted to non-profit I '
organizations, registered charities are further afforded the advantage of being able to
issue official donation receipts, whereby individual donors are eligible to receive tax
credits for the contributions they make to registered charities.
I
As a result, the Canadian public contributes to every registered charity by virtue of the
loss of tax revenue resulting from the income tax incentives that ern;:ourage charitable
giving. The public, therefore, has a fundamental interest in ensuring that monies raised
from the general public are used to fulfill their intended charitable purposes. 64
A charity registered under the Act is required to be bona fide, meaning that it must be .
established and operated to confer a tangible or objectively measurable benefit upon the
ii hltps://twitter.com/DonaldDogan
19 https://twitter.com/DonaJdDogan
60 In December 1978, a series of attacks occurred in the city ofKahramanmar~. Turkey. Perpetrated by Turkish
nationalists, the attacks resulted in the deaths of 111 people and injured hundreds more. The majority of the victims
were Alevi Kurds. Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7922/turkey-container-cities
61 On December 28, 2011 , the Turkish warplanes bombed Kurdish smugglers crossing into Turkey from Iraq. Thirty-
four people died in the bombing. Many of the deceased .were teenagers. Source:
http://www.cconomist.com/node/21556616
62 https://www.facebook.com/donald.dogan/posts/10153424905177841 ?fref=nf
63 Vancouver Society, ibid no I, para. 170. ,
61 Position taken by the Public Guard ian and Trustee of Ontario as outlined in Pathak v. Sabha, [2004) CanLJI I 0850
(0.S.C), para. 10.

····-·- -·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
public, without personal or private gain. 65 What is more, the courts have placed extensive
responsibility, known as fiduciary duties, on the directors of charities. 66 .
Given the particular vulnerabilities associated with the region to which the Organization
is directing its resources, the CRA would expect that the Organization would have put in
place strict provisions to ensure that the funds were directed towards charitable activities
and were not instead, directly or indirectly, used as a means of support for, or benefit to, a
terrorist entity. 67
Instructions to this effect are in fact provided in the CRA document Checklist for
charities on avoiding terrorist abuse. 68 The introduction to the checklist observes that, in
order to maintain public confidence in the .charitable sector, " ... the Government of
Canada and charities need to protect the charitable sector from abuse, including the
exploitation ofcharitable resources to support terrorism and other non-charitable
purposes and activities " and further notes that:
The factors that promote Canadians' high respect for charities can also make
them vulnerable to exploitation by terrorist supporters. Charities bring
people together for a common p1,.1rpose and collective action. Some charities
have a global presence, often in conflict zones or in places with little
infrastructure, and frequently move money, people, and goods to and from
these areas. Where there are no banks, charities may have to deal in cash or
use alternative remittance systems. All this may unintentionally provide a
network, and a cloak oflegitimacy, for activities that support terrorism.
The document informs readers that "it makes good sense on many levels for charities to
develop and implement sound internal governance and accountability procedures,
financial controls, risk management systems; and transparent reporting, and to keep
these things under regular review. These are among the best actions any charity can take
to help protect itselfagainst actual or alleged q_buse ofany kind, including allegations of
fraud, money laundering, or support for terrorism"
I
Although not exhaustive, the checklist provides charities with a list of questions it must
ensure it has addressed in order to minimize the risk of its resources being redirected
towards terrorist activities. Included in this list is the question "Do you know your ·
65 M. Chestennan. Charities, Trusts and Social Welfare London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1979. p. 136; and see
generally, Gilmour v. Coats et al, [1949] lAll E.R. 848
66
See, for example, Ontario (Public Guardian and Trustee) v. Aids Society/or Children (Ontario), [2001] OJ No. 2170
(QL) (O.S.C.J.); Ontario (Public Guardian and Trustee) v. National Society for Abused Women, [2002] O.J. No. 607
(0.S.C.J.); Pathak v. Sabha, [2004] CanLII 10850 (0.S.C). Victoria Order ofNurses/or Canada v. Greater Hamilton
Wellness Foundation, [2011] CanI.;11 5684 (O.S.C.J.). ·
67
Under Canadian law, a terrorist group means a listed entity or an entity that has as one.of its purposes or activities
facilitating or carrying out any terrorist activity.
68
http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/chrts-gvng/chrts/chcklsts/vtb-eng.html
18
.,
' .
i,
'
'
.
,; '
partners in delivering the work you are doing, and their affiliations to other
organizations?" ·
In effect, the above-cited document instructs charities to conduct meaningful due

diligence on all aspects of its operations, including its partners or intermediaries in
program delivery, in order to prevent a charity's resources from being used in a manner
that would coptravene Canadian law and the charity's requirements for ongoing
registration, including ensuring that a charity does not operate in association with
· individuals or groups· that are engaged in terrorist activities or that support terrorist
i . 'I
activities. This due diligence is all the more important for those charities operating in • '
: i
·-politically volatile and/or war-torn regions. 'i
.ii '
The audit failed to reveal any evidence to suggest that the Organization made any efforts I
I
to investigate the merits of any of its funding recipients/intermediaries. Our concerns in I
:
this regard are heightened by the audit findings which suggest that key members of the
Organization openly suppon the PKK, calling into question whether the Organization had :1
any real commitment to, or intention of, undertaking any meaningful due diligence. · i
·1
:1
· All registered charities are ~xpected to talce the necessary steps to ensure compliance with :[ 'I '
i
the requirements for registration. As outlined above; due d11igence measures are a matter ,I !
of good governance, that can, if conscientiously and genuinely implemented, serve to ;1
!,
,·!
lessen the risk that a charity's resources will be used in a manner that could result in i!.
revocation. It i~-apparent that the Organization's directors failed to conduct any I
meaningful due diligence measures, and, therefore, failed to ensure that the Organization
met the requirements of the Act for its continued registration. . i
1.4 Gifting to Non-Qualified Donees / Lack of Control and Direction Over

Resources
A registered charity is not·permitted to make gifts to non-qualified donees. 69 Subsection

149.1 (1) of the Act requires that a charitable organization devote all of its resources to
"charitable activities carried on by the organization itself'. Subsection 149.1(6) provide;, . :i ,
that a charitable organization shall be considered to be devoting its resources to charitable .i
69 Qualified donees are _as follows:

•a registered charity (including a registered national arts service organization)
ea registered Canadian amateur athletic association . ·
l
,,
:1
ii.
•a registered housing corporation resident in Canada constituted exclusively to provide loyv-cost housing for the aged
•a registered Canadian municipality . ,· .·
•a registered municipal or public body performing a function ·or government in Canada
. .
.
i" !
:1.
•a registered university outside Canada that is prescribed to be a.university, the student body of which ordinarily
includes students from Canada · .
•a registered charitable organization outside Canada to which Her Majesty in right of Canada has made a gift
•Her Majesty in right of Canada, a province, or a territory ·
•the United Nations and its agencies · . .
htcorne Ta.'\ Act, R.S.C. 1985 (S'h supp.) c. I, para. 110.1( l)(a), ss. 118.1(1) and 149.1 (I) and 149.1(6.4). 188. 1(5)
I
[I,
.,
19 :!:I .
·1
;1
- - - - - - - -- -- - - - ~ ~ ~- - ---- - - -- - - -- ~~ ~~ - -
- - --- - - - ···- ---
activities carried on by it to the extent that in any taxation year it disburses not more than
50% of its income for that year to qualified donees.
Except where a charity gifts its funds to a qualified donee, the CRA requires it to show
that it effectively directs arid actually controls its own activities on an ongoing basis,
including situations in which a charity carries out its activities through an intermediary
such as an agent. 70 The Federal Court of Appeal has confirmed that a charity working
with an intermediary must have control over the activities carried out on its behalf, and
over the use of its resources. 71 When a charity merely transfers its resources to another
entity that is not a qualified donee, and fails to maintain effective direction and actual
control over those resources, the charity has, in effect, made a gift to a non-qualified
donee. This contravenes the purpose and intent of the charitable registration provisions of
the Act.
Our audit findings indicate that the Organization failed to maintain control and direction
· over resources gifted to non-qualified donees, both in Canada and Rojava.
a) Payment of services related to the Kurdish Peace and Cultural Festival
As noted above in Section 1.3.1 b), the Organization conducts activities in association
with or on behalf of the.Kurdish Community Centre of Toronto (KCC). As part of the
audit, the Organization provided receipts for payment of services for the 2011 Kurdish
Festival, August 28, 2011, at Earlscourt Park. Open source information suggests that this
is likely the activity of the KCC. 72 For example, a promotional video 73 on Youtube for
the festival provides the KCC's phone number, 416-654-2049, as the contact number.
Furthermore, our analysis of the receipts for expenses provided by the Organization
indicates that many of the receipts, in fact, belonged to the KCC and not the
Organization. The CRA reviewed several invoices fot the festival where the name on the
receipt was of the KCC and not that of the Organization. It appears as though the
Organization simply paid the invoices. For example:
• The Organization provided receipts paid for by an individual named Dogan Dogan. 74
The receipts were in regards to the "Festival Day Spendings". This includes:
7
°CRA Guidance CG-002, Ccmadian registered charities ca,'1J•i11g out ar:tivities outside Canada
11 The Canadian Committee for the Tel Aviv Foundation v. Canada (2002 FCA 72) 2002-03-01; Canadian Magen
David Adomfor Israel v. Canada (Minister ofNational Revenue) (2002 FCA 323) 2002-09-13; and Bayit Lep/etot v.
Canada (Minister ofNational Revenue) (2006 FCA 128) 2006-03-28
72 The KCC is located at 1290 Finch Avenue West, Toronto
73hllps://www.voutube.com/watch?v=H3kqEldFalQ
74
Dogan Dogan is not listed as a director on the Organization's T3010s, but he appears to be in control of the
Organization's finances. In documentation provided by the Organization, he appears to be a signatory on the
Organization's cheques, wire transfers and donation receipts.
20
o Garbage Bin rental from - which contains the name
"Kurdish Community" - likely referring to the KCC.
o
o Application of Noise Permit from the City of Toronto. 75
Additionally, the Organization provided what appears to be an August 18, 2011, permit
for the use of Earlscourt Park - and rather than listing the Organization as the client, it
listed the Canadian Toronto Kurdish Federation 76 along with the KCC's address of 1290
Finch Avenue West, Unit 7. 77 Several days later, August 23, 2011, another invoice was
created for the same amount with the Organization's name on it. ,i
Lastly, the CRA notes, that while the festival has occurred each and every year since
2011 there has been no apparent involvement by the Organization in any of the
subsequent festivals. It continues to be a festival organized and promoted by the KCC.
As such, it is our opinion that the Organization's payment ofreceipts for expenses
incurred by KCC, for activities of KCC, constitute gifts to a non-qualified do nee.
b) Gifts-in-Kind
The CRA's guidance on "Canadian Registered Charities Carrying out Activities Outside
of Canada" permits transfers of gift in kind to non-qualified donees in very limited
. circumstances as a matter of administrative tolerance. However, charities wishing to
avail themselves of this policy are responsible for makings sure that they do not operate
in association with individuals or groups that ru;e engaged in terrorist activities or that
support terrorist activities.
In certain limited circumstances, the CRA may consider a charity to be carrying out its
own activities by transferring certain resources to a non-qualified donee. The CRA will
take into account all relevant circumstances when determining this, but at a minimum, the
following three conditions must all apply:
i. The nature of the property being transferred is such that it can reasonably be used
only for charitable purposes (for example, medical supplies like antibiotics and
instruments, which will likely only be used to treat the sick, or school supplies
like textbooks, which will likely only be used to advance education); please note
75Application of Noise Permit from the City of Toronto, Municipal Licencing & Standards, August 19, 2011.
76 The Organization provided two invoices that listed the Canadian Toronto Kurdish Federation as the client.
17 The Canadian Toronto Kurdish Federation appears to be an alternate name for, or associated with, the
Kurdish Community Ce~tre of Toronto. Both organizations use the address of 1290 Finch Ave. W., Unit 7,
North York as it address. In addition, the individual listed on the permit for the CanadianToronto Kurdish
Federation, is listed as a director of the KCC according the CRA's records.
21
- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - ---- --- - - - - ---
that transfers of money are not acceptable, and always require ongoing direction
and control.
ii. Both parties understand and agree the property is to be used only for the specified
charitable activities.
iii. Based on an investigation into the status and activities of the non-qualified donee
receiving the property (including the outcome of any previous transfers by the
charity), it is reasonable for the charity to have a strong expectation that the
organization will use the property only for the intended charitable activities.
Investigating the status and activities of an intermediary would typically include

examining details such as the intermediary's stated goals and purposes, any previous
relationship with the charity and other charities, its history and general reputation, and
relevant media reports.
If any of the above three conditions do not apply, then a charity will only be able to meet
the own activities test by directing and controlling the use of its resources as otherwise
stated in this guidance. If a charity fails to direct and control the use of its resources as
required, it risks sanctions under the Act. This includes financial penalties and revocation
of its registered status.
Charities have to remember their obligations under Canada's anti-terrorism legislation. As

with all individuals and organizations in Canada, charities are responsible for making
sure that they do not operate in association with individuals or groups that are engaged in
terrorist activities, or that support terrorist activities.
Fire Truck
The Organization appears to have donated a fire truck to the City of Van. However, the
CRA has concerns about the documentation provided by the Organization. As is evident
from the dates on the social media posting and the media article, the fire truck was
received sometime in November 2012. 78
As part of the audit, the Organization provided a series of documents pertaining to the
transfer of the fire truck to the Van municipality. A review of the documentation reveals
that aside from the money transfer document, no other information indicates the
Organization's involvement in the donation of the fire truck. Furthermore, our analysis of
the dates of the documentation provided suggests that the Organization was not in
possession of these documents prior to the delivery of the fire truck. For example: 79
78
The CRA was able to confirm that the fire truck donated in November 2012 was likely the same fire truck donated by
the Organization by comparing the licence plate number of the fire truck appearing in the photo to the licence plate
number indicated.on the vehicle donation agreement provided by the Organization. ·
79
Correspondence provided by the Organization to the CRA, dated January 26, 2016.
22
• The Organization wired $120,000 in July 2012 to Garanti Itfaiye Araclari to
purchase the fire truck. No supporting documentation was provided to
demonstrate that the funds were used for that purpose.
• Open source information indicates a fire truck was received by the Van
municipality in November 2012 with from Canada, 80 however there is no
mention of the Organization's involvement in the donation. Instead, Mr. Jim
Karygiannis is noted as presenting the fire truck. The Organization has not
provided any information regarding his involvement in this project.
• The notarized form giving Power of Attorney to Osman Acar on behalf of the
Organization was signed on February 15, 2013. It is unclear why the Organization
would grant Mr. Acar the power attorney in February 2013 when the fire truck
was apparently_already received by the city of Van in November 2012.
• The donation authorization agreement was signed by the Mayor of Van on
May 20, 2013.
• The vehicle donation agreement, signed June 24, 2013, is between Mr. Erol
Duran, on behalf of Garanti Itfaiye Araclari, and Mr. Osman Acar. There is no
mention of the Organization's involvement in the donation of the fire truck.
• The vehicle was only registered effective July 24, 2013.
In addition, there seems to be several large gaps between when the money was sent
overseas (July 13, 2012) to when the fire truck was 'delivered' (November 2013) and
· when it was registered (July 24, 2013). This raises the issue of whether or not the City of
Van actually received the fire truck in November, as reported by the media, if the fire
truck was not registered until July 2013.
The documentation provided by the Organization in support of this activity fails to

substantiate that it maintained control and direction over, and was fully accountable for,
the use of its resources. In addition, as noted above in section 1.3.1 c) the CRA has
serious concerns regarding the beneficiary selected for this project. As such, the CRA 'I .
considers the transfer of funds for the purchase of the fire truck as a gift to a non-
qualified donee.
I
i
,I
Clothing donation
The CRA has concerns about the gift-in-kind being sent to ·Rojava, Syria, because of the
violence, instability regarding the political situation, and apparent presence of the PKK
and like-minded political parties and militant groups operating in the region. For
example:
10 hltp ://www.habcrler.com/kanada-dan-van-a-itfai vc-araci-yardimi-4108390-haberi/
23
• "Rojava still represents the hope of thousands of Kurds, to see Oailed PKK leader
Abdullah] Ocalan's political projects realised: 'democratic autonomy' and local 'self-
administration"81
• "PKK shares a long-term political vision with the PYD, but it is also the only actor
that is now supporting the PYD and the, YPG in Kobane left to fight on their own. " 82 ·
• When asked about PKK inside Kobane, Mr. Tatli [the Organization's clothing'
intermediary] responded in a media article that "Even if there are PKK members,
once they are in Kobane~ we have to consider them as YPG militias. " 83
Our concerns regarding the ongoing situation in Rojava, Syria are exacerbated by the
Organization's intermediary's apparent connection to organizations linked to the PKK. ·
As detailed above, Mr. Tatli has an apparent association with groups and political parties
that are ideologically aligned with the PKK. For example, Mr. Tatli's apparent
membership in the Rojava Solidarity and Aid Association (RSAA) 84 is a concern for the
CRA as it appears to be part of a larger coalition, the Ko bane Crisis Committee, of
political groups that appear to be ideologically associated with the PKK. 85 For example,
the Democratic Society Congress (DTK) appears to be promoting a campaign to delist
the PKK:
"The PKK is in the list of terrorist organisations in Europe and the US. We want
people to campaign to remove the PKK from this list. We think this is the first
priority."[ ... ] "If you help us change the PKK's situation in Europe, maybe it can
be a support not just for Kurdish people but also for life in the future. " 86
1.1 Giulia Bertoluzzi and Costanza Spocci, "Tent cities, gas canisters and anger at Turkish-Syrian border", October 8,
2014, http://www.middleeasteve.net/in-Jepth/tent-citfos-gas-canisters-and-anger-turkish-svrian-bonler-2094319416,
12 Giulia Bertoluzzi and Costanza Spocci, "Tent cities, gas canisters and anger at Turkish-Syrian border", October 8,
2014, http://www.middleeasteye.net/in-depth/tent-cities-gils-canisters-and-nnger-turkish-svrian-border-::W94319416,
13 Giulia Bertoluzzi and Costanza Spocci, "Tent cities, gas canisters 8{ld anger at Turkish-Syrian border", October 8,
2014, http://www.111iddlee,L~teye.net/in-deptl1/tent-cities-11,L'i-canisters-and-angcr-1urkish-syrian-horcler-~094319416,
14 Rojava Solidarity and Aid Association, aka: Rojava Association, West Rojava Association. It was founded in
· November 2014 in Suruc to cope with challenge of migrants to Turkey in the area. It works in coordination with all
municipalities in the region, Kobane Canton Administration, NGOs [unamed], Kobane Reconstruction Board, local
authorities and other civil initiatives in the region to deliver humanitarian aid in Rojava and migrated people in Turkey.
U· . . ,
• Democratic Society Congress (DTK)

• DBP (Party of Democratic Regions, formerly BOP)
• HOP (Peoples' Democratic Party)
• HDK (Peoples' Democratic Congress
• Suruc Municipality
16
Corporate Watch, "Democratic autonomy in North Kurdistan: an interview with the Democratic Society Congress",
April 28, 2016, https://c01poratewatch.org/news/W 16/aprn&tdemocrat ic-autonomy-north-kurdistan-interview-
deinocratic-socicty-congress, [accessed 2016--05-06).
24
As noted above, the audit findings indicate that the Organization's foreign intermediaries
appear to be associated or ideologically aligned with Kurdish political or terrorist groups.
The Organization has not demonstrated that it conducted any meaningful due diligence i'
I
when selecting intermediaries to carry out its activities outside of Canada, Consequently, !·
this transfer does not appear to qualify as a gift to a qualified donee.
In the absence of documentary evidence demonstrating direction and control, it is our

preliminary conclusion that the Organization has gifted its resources to non-qualified
donees and has operated in direct contravention to subsection l49.l(l) of the Act that
requires that a charitable organization devote all of its resources to charitable activities
carried on by the organization itself.
. Consequently, it ,is our view that the Organization has ceased to comply with the . ' .
requirements of section 149.1(1) of the Act, and for this reason it appears there may be ''
grounds for revocation of its charitable status pursuant to paragraph 168(1 )(b) of the Act.
2. Failed to maintain and provide books and records as required ·
The Act requires, under subsection 230(2), that registered charities maintain adequate
. books and records87 of account at a single address in Canada that is registered with the
CRA containing information in such form as will enable the Minster to determine '
whether there are grounds for the revocation of its registration under the Act. Faih,ire to · 1 r
maintain proper books and records in accordance with the requirements of the Act is
itself sufficient reason to revoke an organization's charitable status. 88
I. I:
Subsection 231 . 1(1) of the Act permits an authorized person to inspect, audit, or examine
the books and records of a taxpayer and any document of the taxpayer or of any other
Ii
person that relate or may relate to the information that is or should be in the books and
records of the taxpayer or to any amount payable by the taxpayer under the Act.
(
In order to meet this requirement, a charity must keep adequate books and records so that
any official donation receipts that are issued, as well as income and expenses, can be
verified. In addition, the Act requires th~t a charity keep information that will allow the
CRA to determine whether its activities continue to be charitable.
The requirement relating to the maintenance of books and records, and books of accotJnt,
is based on several decisions of the courts, which have held, among other things, that:
17 Subsection 248( I) of the Act defines a record in the following way: "record includes an account, an agreement, a
book. a chart or table, a diagram, a form, an image, an invoice, a letter, a map, a memorandum, a plan, a return, a
statement, a telegram, a voucher, and other thing containing infonnation, whether in writing or in any other form."
15 College Rabbiniq11e de Montreal Oir Hachaim D 'Tash v. Canada (Minister ofCustoms and Revenue Agency). 2004
. FCA. IOI.
25
--~-------,.------------------------- - -------- - --- .
• It is the responsibility of a registered charity to provide that its charitable status

should not be revoked. 89
• A registered charitymust maintain, and make available to the CRA at the time of
an audit, meaningful books and records, regardless of its size or resources. It is not
sufficient to' supply the required books and records at some later date. 90
• Paragraph 168(l)(e) of the Act provides that the Minister may propose to
._ revoke registration of a ch"aritable organization if it fails to comply with or
contravenes any of sections 230 to 231.5 and the Federal Court of Appeal
determined that non-compliance with section 230(2) is a proper basis upon
which the Minister may issue such a notice. 91
• The requirement to keep proper books and records is foundational and non-
compliance justifies revocation. 92
• Given the significant privileges that flows from registration under the Act as
a charitable organization, the Minister must be able to mpnitor the continuing
enti{lenient of the charitable organization to those privileges. In that regard,
the court agreed with the Minister that the obligation c,f a charitable
organization to maintain adequate books and records is foundational. 93
As outlined below, the audit has identified a number of deficiencies with respect to the
Organization's books and records. In some instances, the Organization either did not
_maintain, or was unable to provide, books and records, and as such the CRA was not able
to ve~ify income, expenses, donations, and use of resources.
2.1.1 Fiscal period ended December 31, 2011
a) On October 8, 2015, we requested the Organization provide the General Ledger

and Bank Statements for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2011. !
It failed to provide the General Ledger. The Organization provided copies of its
bank statements, which did not reconcile with the amounts reported on Schedule
6, Detailed financial information of the form T3010 or the financial statements.
b) The Organization received donations totalling $101,252that were directed to the

Wan Earthquake but failed to provide adequate supporting documents to show
how these funds were expended for charitable purposes.
89
See The Canadian Committee/or the Tel Aviv Foundation v. Canada (2002 FCA 72)
90
See ibid.See also The Lord's Evangelical Church of Deliverance and Prayer ofToronto v. Canada, (2004) FCA
397).
91
Opportunities/or the Disabled Foundation v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FCA 94;
92
Jaamiah Al Uloom Al Jslamiyyah Ontario v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FCA 49, paragraph 15
93
Humane Society ofCanada for the Protection ofAnimals and the Environment v. Canada (National Revenue), 2015
FCA 178, paragraph 80.
26
I I' Ii
/·
I II
I I
1·
c) The Organization failed to provide a detailed descriptiop of each fundraising

activity it carried out during the 2011 fiscal period. Additionally, the Organization
failed to provide a breakdown of the expenses associated with each fundraising
activity with copies of invoices. 1'i
I
,,
Line 4920 reported $17,485 stating these amounts were for "fundraising event and !
organization expenses", whereas the receipts provided totalled $5,095. !
1

: I',
a) The Organization's records indicate a discrepancy with respect to amounts

received from its official donation receipts.
• On January 12, 2015, the Organization provided its list of official donation 1
receipts which indicated that it received $460 in tax receipted gifts for the
fiscal period ended December 31, 2012, however the Organization
reported the amount of$7,657 on line 4500 of its T3010.
• On November 18, 2015, the Organization provided a second official I
I
donation receipt listing with a total of $5,422. It stated that, "Total

donation collected in 2012 was $7,657 from which $5,422 was issued.
donation receipts and the rest was collected cash from donation boxes".
b) The Organization reported expenses in the amount of$9,081 as "Events expense"

on its 'Statement of Operations Non-profit' but failed to provide supporting
documents to substantiate the expenditure.
a) The Organization failed to provide details about its fundraising activities in 2013
despite reporting in section C6 of its T3010 that it conducted "Fundraising
•i
dinners/galas/concerts". The Organization's "Statement of Operations" reported
$11,486 in "Fundraising expenditures', no receipts were provided for these expenses.
b) On October 8, 2015, the CRA requested more documentation about its scholarship
I .
activities particularly how the Organization determines the eligibility of the students. I
Specifically, the CRA asked the Organization to provide:

• the selection criteria used for awarding monetary scholarships to students;
• the procedures in place to ensure the students meet the selection criteria in
order to receive the scholarships;
• copies of scholarship applications received during the fiscal period;
• copies of promotional material used to advertise the scholarship;
• documentation showing that the students are enrolled in a program at that
university.
27
The Organization failed to provide the additional documentation .as requested by the CRA
as it pertains to the scholarship program.
The Organization did not provide details about the fundraising activities in 2014, despite
reporting in section C6 of its T3010 that it conducted "Fundraising
dinners/galas/concerts". The Organization's "Statement of Operations" reported $2,701
for 'Event expenses'; no receipts were provided for these expenses.
The Organization failed to provide the books and records necessary to conduct our audit.
Without evidence to indicate otherwise, it is our position that the Organization's books
and records have not been provided and maintained in accordance with sections 230 to
131.5 of the Act. Consequently, there may be grounds for the Minister to revoke the
Organization's charitable status under paragraph 168(1)(e) of the Act.
3. Issuing official receipts not in accordance with the Act and/or its Regulations
A registered charity is in contravention of the Act and its Regulations when it issues
donation receipts that are inc.orrect, incomplete, or contain deliberately false information.
The Act and its Regulations 3500 and 3501 set out the requirements for registered
charities with respect to the issuing of official donation receipts, and allows for various
penalties or sanctions as set out in subsection 188.1(7) to 188.1 (10) of the.Act.
The audit revealed that the official receipts issued by the Organization did not fully comply
with the requirements of Regulation 3501(1)ofthe Act.
3501. (1) Every official receipt issued by a registered organization shall contain a
statement that it is an official receipt for income tax purposes and shall show
clearly in such a manner that it cannot readily be altered,
(a) the name and address in Canada of the organization as recorded with the
Minister;
(b) the registration number assigned by the Minister to the organization;
(c) the serial number of the receipt;
(d) the place or locality where the receipt was issued;
(g) the name and address of the donor including, in the case of an individual, the
individual's first name and initial;
(i) the signature, as provided in subsection (2) or (3), of a responsible individual

who has been authorized by the organization to acknowledge gifts; and
(j) the name and Internet website of the Canada Revenue Agency.
28
Specifically~ the Organization's receipts were missing the following information:
• the address of the donor; .

• the place or locality 'where the receipt was issued;
; .:
' .
Accordingly, it is our position that the Organization has failed to ~eet .t he requirements
under Regulation 3501. Under paragraph 168(l)(d) of the Act, the Minister may.propose :: : 1 i
to revoke a charity's registered status if it issues a receipt otherwise than in accordance . · _i / :_· !.'
with t_he Act and its Regulations. 1 11
: . ! ; '.:
: j:;i
'.. ; ~
4. Registered Charity Information Return (T3010) . ·i t
i'·1 :
Subsection 149.1(14) of the Act requires that every registered charity file an information
,,'I
! ;·
return in the prescribed form, containing the prescribed information, without notice or i.
I .
demand, within six months of its fiscal year end. For a registered charity the prescribed· ! !
form and the prescribed information includes: · I i
• the form T30IO, Registered Charity Information Return; I:
• the basic information sheet; · I:
• . the.form T1235, Directorsil'rustees and Like ()fjicials Worksheet;
I !.
• the form Ti 236, QualifiedDonees Worksheet - if applicable; and
:II.' !.;
• ·the financial statements. ·· · · .! '

:I; ; i
:1:
It is the responsibility of the charity to ensure that the information provided in its return, '1 ·
applicable worksheets and financial statements, is factual and complete in every respect. . · : I: 1 ,
A charity must keep .track of its expenditures during the fiscal period in such a way that it 1 ; •
is able to give amounts that are reasonably accurate. A charity cannot arbitrarily allocate :JI ; :.i :
its expenditures at the end of the fiscal period. It must be able to justify its amounts. .
While the _categories on the return may not correspond exactly to the categories used by a · '. /
charity to record its expenditures, we need to know how much the charity spent .o n these :j
categories to determine if it meets all of its requirements under the Act A charity is not .j :
meeting its requirements to file an Information Return if it fails to exercise due care with : j 1•
. respect to enst1ring the accuracy thereof. !I · !:
4.1 Errors/omissions on form T3010 :1: ;: : :
I • '
The audit revealed that the Organization did not.accurately complete its T3010 for the
;I: i :
' '
fiscal periods under audit, in that items reported were incorrectly identified. Specifically: I
!
I
a) Fiscal period ·ended December 31, 2011
I
!:
iI .
I : .,
I . Ii.,
!: I
l
I
29 I
I. t.
1: I
- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - --
i: !:
- - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ --
The Organization reported the amount of$5,356 on line 4810, "Travel and vehicle
expenses". The receipts provided included receipts that appear to be unrelated to "travel
and vehicle expenses", i.e. Ikea, H:ome Depot, post office, restaurants, groceries, etc. The
receipts related to Ikea and Home Depot did not provide enough information to show
how it would support the Organization's activities. Some of the receipts for the
restaurants and groceries did not provide enough information to determine if these
expenses are related to the charitable program.
b) Fiscal period ended December 31, 2012
The information provided on Section D, Financial Information, concerning the total

assets, total liabilities, total revenue and total expenses did not reconcile with the
financial statement and/or bank statements provided. The Organization failed to provide
the requested form Tl 240, Registered Charity Adjustment Request.
It is our position the Organization has failed to comply with the Act by failing to file an
accurate T3010.
4.2 Late filing of form T3010, Registered Charity Information Return
Pursuant to subsection 149.1(14) of the Act, every "registered charity" must, within six
months after the end of the charity's fiscal period (taxation year), without notice or
demand, file a Registered Charity Information Return with the applicable schedules.
The Organization has not filed its T30l0 within six months of its fiscal period ending as
summarized below:
Fiscal period end Due date Date filed

2011-12-31 2012-06-30 2012-08-09
2012-12-31 2013-06-30 2014-03-18
2013-12-31 2014-06-30 2014-12-09
2014-12-31 2015-09-30 2015-11-03
Under subsection 168( I)( c) of the Act, the registration of a charity may be revoked if it
fails to file a charity information return when required under the Act. It is our position the
Organization has failed to comply with the Act by failing to file an accurate T30IO. For
this reason, there may be grounds to revoke the registered status of the Organization
under paragraph 168(l)(c) of the Act.
Conclusion
30
On the basis of our audit findings, it is our view that for each of the reasons above, there
are sufficient grounds for the revocation of the Organization's charity registration under
subsection 168(1) the Act.
;I
The Organization's options:
l ::1
II ! 'I
a) No response '. I
The Organization may choose not to respond. In that case, the Director General of
the Charities Directorate may give notice of its intention to revoke the registration of
the Organization by issuing a Notice of Intention in the manner described in
subsection 168(1) of the Act.
b) Response
I
11
Should the Organization choose to respond, please provide your written
representations and any additional information regarding the findings outlined above . 1
within 30 days from the date of this letter. After considering the representations
submitted by the Organization, the Director General of the Charities Directorate will i I :
decide on the appropriate course of action, which may include: •I
• no compliance action necessary; •I
• the issuance of an educational letter;

• resolving these issues through the implementation of a Compliance
Agreement; or
• giving notice of its intention to revoke the registration of the Organization I:
by issuing a Notice of Intention in the manner described in subsection
168(1) of the Act. I;
I:
If you appoint a third party to represent you in this matter, please send us a written
authorization naming the individual and explicitly authorizing that individual .to discuss
your file with us.
If you have any questions or require further information or clarification, please contact
me at 613-946-2936.
Yours sincerely,
31
Mailing address
Canada Rev~nu~ Agency
Ottawa ON ~,J~ lotf5'
-_;,,,-,~?,:',,-.1:.,:.•:. .... -... ,•. :. ,..:
Courier address
Canada Revenue Agency
Suite 100, 1st floor
Tower A, Place de Ville
320 Queen Street
Ottawa ON i~w£l~3\
c.c.: Ms. Rahrnati Khenaw
32
:! r11
L ! I
!, .I
! I
II, 11
i
'I'. J !
:: ·i I
!
Appendix A · , :1 1
I :1
i' ,·
Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK.) 1· :·
The PKK was. listed by the Government of Canada as a terrorist entity on De~ember 10, 2002. 1 .
i:i :1'1
!.I ,
i! i
Formally established in Turkey in 1978 by Abdullah Ocalan, the PKK is a Kurdish political party ij!.[ Ii ! II
whose main goal is the ~reation of ·an independent Kurdish state in southeast Turkey and in· ,., ''i I
northern Iraq, a region that is part of the traditional territory of the Kurdish people. To r~ach its · !·1 :ii
I :!
goal, the PKK. has led a c·ampaign of guerrilla warfare and terrorism, especially in Turkey and in
· northern Iraq. 2 , . . li'!i .
. I· . . .
Although the PKK.' s te;orist activities have·slowed since its most recent ceasefire with the· '
Turkish Government, its ~embers·h~ve continued to ~nduct terrorist attacks.against civilian,

. military and other gove~ent targets in Turkey. PKK militan~·continue to frequently attack '
Iii Ii
I.' i'
I J•
military bases and police interests, kidnap civilians and military personnel and sabotage . . !
1:
infrastructure projects, including dams, gas pipelines and power plants. over so people have ,,
i:
been killed in PKK. attacks since 20 August 2012, and the group is reported to have kidnapped . i :
more than 300 children.between December 2013 and May 2014. 3 · 1, ·.
., !I
. . . . . . .
1:.. ,.· ,I
The PKK is listed as a proscribed terrorist organisation by Turkey, the European Union, the Ii :i i
J· 'J !
United States, the UnitedKingdom," Austria, Azerbaijan, Iraq, Frarice, Germany, the · !. ·I•
,. :i
·Netherlands, Kazakhstan, Moldova, New Zealand and the Philippiiies.4 . . !: ./'
.
The People's-Protection (or Defence) Unit (YPG)
I F! :i
If
j· :1 !
!: ;I i,
I' , " .
The People's Protection Units (YPG) is the Kurdish military force in Syria that.appears to serve
I·
· as the armed branch of the Democratic Union Party5 (PYD),6 ~d the defensive force for Kurdish 1 ! i
j: ! I
regions of northern Syria. The YPG is matched by its sister militia, the Women's Protection · . / i; !i
Units (YPJ). 7 . . . · j I'
:1f
. YPG's missi~n is "to p~otect Western Kurdistan and all its ethnic, national and religi~us I Iii '' ;
'!
' components, and ·t o.provide security and safety to citiz~ns wherever they are; to deter any ·. ·/
military force aimed at de-stabilising civil peace and stability; it pledges to defend the gains and
the values of freedom and social democracy, and the legitimate aspirations of the Kurdish and ·: :.:. i
Synan people in their revolution against dictatorship and the forces of terror and darkness. ,:,s. · j.
r' ·1:
i: 'I
I; j,:
' I:
,. I 1
I http;//WWW.pub)icsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ntn)-scrt/cntr-tmsm/)std-ntts/crmt-(std-ntts-en.aspx ..
· :
· 2 http://www. pub licsafety .gc. ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/cntr-trrrsm/lstd-ntts/crmt-lsti.1-ntts-en.aspx
.1 https://www.nationalsecurity.gov .au/Listedterroristorganisations/Pages/KurdistanWorkersParty .. 1
.
::·i' :ir,·
4 https://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/Listedterroristorganisations/Pages/KurdistanW orkersPartyPKK.aspx · L ·i !
5 (See below) . . . . . ·. .
I: .i;
•
6 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-ypg-exclusive-idUSKBNl 6Rl QS
I: ·1;
i 11
7 http://www.reuters.com/article/us~mideast~crisis-syria-ypg-exclusive-idUSKBNl6RlQS :· Ii
8 http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/ypg.htm (accessed April 18, 2017). 1:
'j,
ti.
1:·, I
I .,
H .I
j:
'. !I
Ii
'1
1
l'i· Ii
!'
According to publicly available information, as of mid-2014, the YPG had between 30,000-
50,000 fighters. 9 According to The Syria Institute, in August 2016 the number of fighters was
apparently still approximately 30,000-50,000, 10 while another source reported that in 2016, the
number of fighters rose to 65,000. 11
The YPG gets its inspiration from the philosophy of Abdullah Ocalan, 12 13 leader of the
Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) 14 and according to media reports, the YPG's slogan is,
"There's no life without the leader (Ocalan)." 15 Posters and banners of PKK leader Abdullah
Ocalan adorn the walls of the YPG headquarters in northern Syria 16 and are featured prominently
at YPG camps and recruitment swearing in ceremonies. 17 In 2016, the YPG renamed a captured
Syrian airbase after the PKK's imprisoned leader, Abdullah Ocalan. 18
A June 6, 2017, article in the New York Times, alleges that PKK operatives wield power behind
the scene in YPG controlled areas and that the YPG's leadership is overwhelmingly composed of
longstanding PKK members. 19
The Women's Protection Units (YPJ)
Within the YPG, exists the Women's Protection (or Defense) Units, known by its Kurdish initials
YPJ. The YPJ is a defense force for all women in Rojava (West Kurdistan) and Syria. 20 The YPJ
considers itself to be the "vanguard force in the People's Defense Units (YPG)." The YPJ
reportedly accounts for around 35 percent of the total PYD-controlled fighters, 21 or 15,000
9 http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/ypg.htm (accessed April 18, 2017).

10 "People's Protection Units (YPG)," The Syria Institute, http://syriainstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/YPG-Cheat·
Sheet-Secure.pdf, August 2016.
11 http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/ypg.htm (accessed April 18, 2017).
12 https://ypginternational.blackblogs.org/the-revolution-in-rojava/ (accessed May 5, 2017).
13 Ocalan is the leader of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) who became widely known as the strongest advocate for Kurdish
sovereignty. As the PKK's leader, Ocalan was also labeled a hero by some Kurds, a terrorist by most international intelligence
agencies, and an enemy of the state by the government of Turkey. (source: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Abdullah-
Ocalan) Ocalan founded the PKK in 1978, and in 1984, the PKK launched what was to become a 15-year armed struggle against
the Turkish government for an independent Kurdish state. Ocalan was captured in Kenya in 1999, and jailed later that year.
(source: http://news.bbc.eo.uk/2/hi/europe/4543283.stm) He was originally sentenced to death, but later commuted to life in
prison after Turkey scrapped the death penalty in pursuit of entry to the European Union. (source:
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2013/03/201332114565201776.html)
14
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) was formally established in Turkey in 1978 by Abdullah Ocalan. The PKK is a Kurdish
political party whose main goal is the creation of an independent Kurdish state in southeast Turkey and in northern Iraq, a region
that is part of the traditional territory of the Kurdish people. To reach its goal, the PKK has led a campaign of guerrilla warfare
and terrorism, especially in Turkey and in northern Iraq. (source: https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/cntr-trrrsm/lstd-
ntts/crrnt-lstd-ntts-en.aspx)
15
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/12/02/gill_rosenberg_the_kurds_and_the_complex_politics_of_terror_walkom.html
16
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/12/02/gill_rosenberg_the_ kurds_and_the_complex_politics_ of_ terror_walkom.html

17
www.cbc.ca/news/pol itics/canada-turkey-kurds-1 .3923 287
18
www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-turkey-kurds-1.3923287
19
www .nytimes.com/2017/06/06/opinion/syria-kurds-isis-raqqa.html
2o http://ypgrojava.com/en/index.php/ypj
21
https://www.trackingterrorism.org/group/ypj-womens-protection-unit (accessed April 18, 2017).
- - ~ - - -- - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - -- - - - - - - -- - · - ·
' i
fighters. 22 The YPJ operates in the Democratic Federal System in Northern Syria, formerly
known as Rojava, and also known as Western Kurdistan. 23
/
24
Founded in 2013, the YPJ is an autonomous organization of the YPG. As noted by YPJ unit
commander, Nesrin Abdalla, the YPG and YPJ are linked, but the leadership, management and
command are completely separate,2 5 The YPJ follows the same ideology.as the YPG, which is I ;
I; I
based on Abdullah Ocalan's26 teachings. 27 Ii :', i'

i :. i I
1: :'
; I• I!
When Syria's unrest began in 2011, women already took part in the protection forces, but in . !
smaller numbers than 2013 onwards, after a 2013 conference led to the creation of a women's
battalion. 28 The YPJ is not only composed of Kurdish women; it also includes both Arab and
non-Syrian women. 29 Moreover, it includes dozens of westerners. 30
Like their male counterparts, the YPJ has fought Jabhat al-Nusra (presently known as Jabhat
Fateh al Sham), 31 and is currently fighting the Islamic State (ISIS). 32 33 However, dissimilar to
their male counterparts, the YPJ ignite fear into ISIS militants, who believe that they will go
straight to hell if they are killed by a woman. 34
The YPJ also notes Turkey as an opponent. Unit commander, Nesrin Abdalla, states, "Our task is
not only to fight [ISIS]. Our defense battalion was created before [ISIS] attacks, since we live in
a feudal society ... " 35 ) !· •
22
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/10/westem-fa~cination-with-badas-20141021 I 2410527736.html (accessed
April 18, 2017). .
23
http://www.kurdistan24.net/en/news/5 I 940tb9-3aff-4e51-bcf8-b I 629af00299/-Rojava--no-longer-exists---Northern-Syria--
adopted-instead- (accessed May 5, 2017).
24
http://www.aljazeeracom/indepth/opinion/2014/I 0/westem-fascination-with-badas-2014 I 02 I 124 I 0527736.html (accessed
April 18, 2017).
25
https://sputniknews.corn/middleeast/201602041034243327-kurdish-ypj-leader-interview/ (accessed April 20, 2017).
26
Ocalan is the leader of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) who became widely known as the strongest advocate for Kurdish ; I
I
sovereignty. As the PKK's leader, Ocalan was also labeled a hero by some Kurds, a terrorist by most international intelligence !
agencies, and an enemy of the state by the government of Turkey. (source: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Abdullah-
Ocalan) Ocalan founded the PKK in 1978, and in 1984, the PKK launched what was to become a 15-year armed struggle against
the Turkish government for an independent Kurdish state. Ocalan was captured in Kenya in 1999, and jailed later that year.
(source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4543283.stm) He was originally sentenced to death, but later commuted to life in
prison after Turkey scrapped the death penalty in pursuit of entry to the European Union. (source:
·http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2013/03/20I332114565201776.html) ·
27 https://www. vice.corn/en_ca/article/we-spoke-to-the-former-canadian-model-who-joined-the-kurdish-fight-against-isis
(accessed April 18, 2017).

28 https://sputniknews.corn/middleeast/iO I 602041034243327-kurdish-ypj-leader-interview/ ( accessed April 20, 2017).
29 https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201602041034243327-kurdish-ypj-leader-interview/ (accessed April 20, 2017).
30 http://www. businessinsider.corn/canadian-model-about-fighting-isis-2015-12 (accessed April 18, 20 I 7).
31 Jabhat AI-Nusra has been a list.ed terrorist entity in Canada since November 7, 2013. (source:
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/cntr-trrrsm/Istd-ntts/crrnt-Istd-ntts-en.aspx)
32 Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL) has been a listed terrorist entity in Canada since August 20, 2012. (source:
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/cntr-trrrsrn/lstd-ntts/crrnt-Istd-ntts-en.aspx)
33 https://www.trackingterrorism.org/group/ypj-womens-protection-unit (accessed April I 8, 2017).
34 http://www.aljazeeracorn/indepth/opinion/2014/1 O/westem-fascination-with-badas-20 l4 I 021124 I 0527736.html (accessed
April 18, 2017). .

35 https://sputniknews.corn/middleeast/20160204 I 034243327-kurdish-ypj-leader-interview/ (accessed April 20, 2017).
1I
I
I 1
_,
Democratic Union Party/ Partiya Yekitiya Demokrat (PYO)
The Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYO) is a Syrian affiliate of the militant Kurdistan
Workers' Party (PKK). 36
a
Since July 2011, it has played a limited role as founding member ofthe National Coordination
Body for Democratic Change and has joined the PKK opposition body known as the People's
Council of Western Kurdistan, which was founded on December 16, 2011. 37
Bans ve Demokrasi Partis1 (BDP) or the Peace and Democracy Party
According to its U.S. Representative Office, the BDP's mission is to "to solve the century-old
Kurdish issue through democracy, pluralism and decentralization." 38
However, according to Glob,a!Security.org, the BOP is a pro.,Kurdish political party that

assumed the place:ofthe banned pro-PKK Democratic Society Party (DTP). 39 The BOP appears
to be following the DTP, assuming most of the same policies and practices, and aligning
themselves closely with the PKKterrorist group. 40 In 2011, the BDP faced legal crackdowns
with nearly 2,000 party members currently detained accused of supporting the PKK. 41
In March 2014, the BOP contested the March2014 municipal elections in parallel with HOP;
BOP candidates rart in Kurdish-dominated areas while the HOP ran in other areas of Turkey,
and, in April 2014, the BOP joined with the HDP. 42
36
http://carnegie-mec.org/diwan/48526?lang=en
37
http://camegie-mec.org/diwan/48526?1ang=en .
38
http://www.bdpusaorg/our-office/
39
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/tu-political-party-bdp.htJn
40
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/tu-political-party-bdp.htm
41
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/tu-political-party-bdp.htJn
42 Political Handbook of the World (PHW). 2015. "Turkey." Edited by Thomas Lansford. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
<http://library,cqpress.com/phw/phw20l5_Turkey> [Accessed 3 June 2016)
Appendix D
November 20, 2017
By: FAX- 613- 941-4401

And By: Courier
CtcarJtres DI
Charities Oi<'ectorate, canada Re'lenue Agency DlrecuondasGr rectorate/
Suite 100, 1st F\oor ,de~
Tower A Place de Ville,
320 Queen Street
Ottawa, ON K1R 5A3
Attention: a_c...;,r::,.:.\f;.:E:D~/~R~e~9~u~j
;--R...
Dear
Re: Aud;t of Anatolia Cultural Foundation
Your File#: 3043592
l write ,n response to your letter dated August 2, 2017, directed to A.dnan Kaya, former president
of the Anatolia Cultural Foundation, (hereafter ACF), and concerning the recent audit of ACF. As
you are now aware, I have been retained to represent ACF in this matter.
However, before I respond to the specific concerns raised in the above letter, I will first respond to
the concerns raised in your subsequent letter to my clients dated October 2att1, 2017. The
concerns identified arose as a result of your being in receipt of conflicting information from my
clients and myself. I have since had an opportunity to discuss this matter at length with my clients
as well as review the relevant letters and documentation and will herein address the concerns
raised.
First, as you noted in the letter, and in a previous conversation with me, the original AFL was
delivered by registered letter in early August and signed for by someone at the offices of ACF.
You provided me the name of that person. I have previously confirmed - in a letter to you - that
the person named is the receptionist for the accountant's offices at the same address. ACF is able
to use one office from the accounting firm and persons from ACF are only at the office typically
once per week. In August no one was there. The secretary of ACF - Ms. Khenaw Rahmati - was
on holidays and in fact did not return to the office until ear1y September. She responded to the
AFL shortly after her return.
Second, as you note, the AFL was addressed to Adnan Kaya, as he was listed as president on
the last T3010-201s ·and the T3010 for 2016 had yet to be filed. When I first met with my clients
I prepared the authorization for Mr. Kaya based on the last T3010 and the fact that the AFL letter
was addressed to him. It was only at the first hastily called meeting with some of the members
that I was advised otherwise. However - since I had not seen the documents to confirm the
change in governance I felt it appropriate to forward the authorization as drafted until the change
could be confirmed. As I indicated in my call to you - this was my decision based on the
circumstances at the time. At no time did either I, or my clients, have any intention of
01 2g J·;
misrepresenting the current governance of the organization. To the contrary, we were trying to
expedite matters to ensure a timely response to the AFL. As I advised you, I have been involved
,n many cases 'Mth the Directorate ,n the past and have never had issues with any other off\Cers
or managers.
Jn the aforementioned Jetter, you mischaracterized the nature of my remarks in our conversation. I
was not •adamanr that Adnan Kaya had signing authority- instead 1 advised you that I believed
he was still involved in the organization, as he was - understandably - at the first meeting with me
as he was the pcesident during the relevant times of the audtt. ( forwarded the first authorization
un\i\ \ cou\d confirm \he etmen\ governance of \he orgamzaUon.
You now have the corree'\ed authorization and confirmation of my retainer. Any further
communication with my clients should be through me from now on.
Administrative Fairness Letter - August 2'"\ 2017
(n your fetter you have identified four areas of non-compliance by ACF and as welt have offered
comments on members of A.CF - past and present - and their a\\eged pootica\ views. tn response,
\ will first dea\ with the concerns raised about the areas of non-comp\iance that have been
identified in the order set out in your letter.
To begin however, I will provide some background to ACF as a charitable not for profit
corporation.
Background
Dets/ls of Incorporation snd Charitable Registration
ACF was incorporated as a non-profit corporation in Ontario on October 2, 2009.
There are three directors of the corporation as authorized by the Letters Patent. The.original
directors-from the date of incorporation until March 2013 were: Seyfi ST Tomar, Firat FO Ozgur
and Cigdem CU Ulas. They were replaced at that time·by: Adnan Kaya, Safak Erdemir and Dilan
Buket Batgi. In 2014 Khenaw Rahmati replaced Ms. Batgi. The foregoing directors were in place
during the period of audit. ·
The objects of the corporation as set out in the Letters Patent are as follow:
1. For the benefit of the public, in particular, persons of Kurdish race and origin, to
advance the knowledge and understanding of Kurdish language, literature, art, theatre and
cultural traditions through conferences, workshops and seminars, and dissemination of '
information on topics related to the Kurdish language, literature, art, theatre and cultural
traditions through print and electronic media.
2. To establish and maintain for the benefit of the general public a library of books,
other forms of printed word, video and audio disks and other media for storing informatio111.
all of these materials being related to Kurdish language, literature, art, theatre and cultural
traditions; to enable these materials to be accessed by the public for study and other
purposes connected to enabling members of the public to deepen their knowledge of
Kurdish language, literature, art theatre and cultural traditions.
3. To relieve poverty, sickness and distress: a members of the community,

particularly those of Kurdish origin who are resident in Ontario, by providing such persons
with advice, assistance, representation, counseling, translating and interpreting and
interpreting services in matters of asylum, immigration, money, debts, welfare benefits,
housing, health, education, training and employment.
4. To relieve poverty, sickness and distress, by the provision of humanitarian aid.
5. To use, apply, give, devote, accumulate or distribute from time to time all or part of
the funds of the corporation and/or the income theretrom, to or for any charitable
organization or charitable organizations registered as such under the Income Tax Act
(Canada) which, in the judgment of the directors of the organization, will promote the
foregoing objects of the corporation.
The organization applied for and was granted charitable status under the Income Tax Act effective
January 18 ', 2011.
The organization does not have formal members but has many people of Kurdish origin who
volunteer for the organization and have done so since its inception.
Finally, the organization is run by volunteers. There have never been any paid employees and
virtually no administrative costs. This fact Is significant in that it is - to a large extent - the reason
for many of the concerns raised in the AFL, both substantive and administrative.
When it was first incorporated, the volunteers were inexperienced in running a charity and
attending to the reporting requirements. Over the years, the situation improved but there were still
issues. ACF's current accountant - Amir Mohammadi, only became involved in assisting
(volunteering for) the organization in August 2014. He has spent many hours attempting to correct
the books and records since he became involved. But, as with many volunteer organizations,
there were often delays in organizing the documents needed by the accountant to do the financial
reporting in a timely manner.
The organization did develop systems for recordkeeping with the numerous projects in which they
were involved. They maintained records of contracts with suppliers and agents as well as some
policy documents regarding decision-making. The fullness of the records kept however was
subject to the difficulties encountered in dealing with issues arsing in disaster areas (earthquakes,
refugee camps) and war zones (Syria).
Note re Stated Purposes and the ActlvltJM of the Organization
Many of the more substantive concerns raised in the AFL refer to the activities of the organization
and whether or not they reflect the stated purposes or other, collateral non-charitable purposes.
In particular you note that the activities undertaken by the organization •appear to suggest a
focus, not on relieving poverty or advancing knowledge related to the Kurdish language, art or
literature, but on advancing and promoting a political ideology associated with the PKK, an
organization listed a terrorist entity in Canada on December 10, 2002: 1:
0126-3
The original purposes of the organization were ambitious, particularly so for an organization run
exclusively by volunteers. Nonetheless the ACF did engage in activities in all but one area - the
library. Regarding this particular object, the ACF in fact applied for grants to begin this project but
have been thus far unsuccessful in accessing resources.
Regarding object 1, in addition to the project sponsoring the festival in 2011, the ACF has held
events with speakers as well as mini conferences during the period in question. The ACF would
also indude under this object the Rojava media project - with which you are aware. The
documentary has been shown in centres across Canada as a means of making the public aware
of the plight of the Kurdish people in Rojava and of the assistance given to them by ACF in
documenting their stories.
Regarding object 3, there were some early efforts to assist in refugee settlement during the audit
time period but these activities really developed after the war in Syria began in August, 2014.
Members of the Board and others were actively involved in assisting refugees from Syria.
However, and as is apparent from the reported activities - the main focus has been under object
4, the relief of poverty, sickness and distress through the provision of humanitarian aid. The ACF
considers the "scholarship" program for students in need in part under this program but also
considers their various projects involving the delivery of goods - food, the fire truck, clothing and
blankets, and pharmaceuticals. You have only referred to two of these projects in the AFL.
Given their limited resources - in both administrative personnel and fundraising revenues, the
ACF has been engaging in most of the original purposes but with the focus as noted - the
provision of humanitarian aid. And to do so they either had their own volunteers on the ground, or
contracted with persons, administrations - civic and hospitals, to deliver the donated goods and
services. They do not engage in activities to promote a political ideology generally or as
specifically alleged - the political ideology of the PKK.
One final point is worthy of note - to the extent that the ACF may be seen to be engaging in public
awareness work as part of their mandate, such activities fall squarely within the guidelines on
upholding human rights. Specifically, with respect to the plight of the Kurdish people in Turkey, it
is well documented in many reliable open sources of the many human rights violations against U,e
Kurds in Turkey. 1
1
https://en.wlklpedla.org/wlkVHuman rights In Turkey
0126-4
Identified Areas of Non-Compliance
1. Ceased to comply with the requirements of the Act for its continued registration -
paragraph 168(1)(b) of the Act
There are four sub-headings under this section. I will respond to each subsection identified.
1.1 Advancement of a separate unstated purpose
In regard to this area of non-compliance you make the following observation.
Reviewing this activity [the scholarship program] and the organization's purposes, it is apparent
that the scholarship program does not advance one of the stated purposes - there being no
purpose that "explicitlyn allows the organization to provide scholarships. You maintain that the
CRA considers the organization to be advancing an unstated purpose.
AT
ACF submits that this program falls within the third and fourth objects- relief of poverty, and the
relief of poverty, sickness, and distress by the provision of humanitarian aid . In this program,
supported students coming from the poorest families in the region. Access to post-secondary
education in Turkey is highly dependent on the income level. Students that ultimately received
ACF financial support could barely provide money for their transportation. ·
Attila Firat, who acted as agent for ACF, was a member of Confederation of Public Workers'
Unions (KESK) when he first contacted the ACF's president at that time, Adnan Kaya, a close
personal friend. Mr. Firat asked if the ACF could provide help with the many poor students that
regularly apply for financial support from the KESK organization, and after reviewing his proposal,
ACF decided to run a scholarship program based on its mandate to relieve poverty and provide
humanitarian aid. The ACF developed a policy to follow for their program and a copy of this
document is attached as Appendix 1. Although the ACF originally thought they could afford a
greater amount, they ultimately were only able to provide $900 per student per month. The former
president interviewed all of the 54 applicants , chose 20, and then Mr. Firat, as the agent for ACF,
provided the information on the 20 students chosen to ensure all were in need. ACF transferred
monthly amounts to the eligible students for a year and had full direction and control over the
funds.
Atilla Firat is currently an employee of the Turkish Parliament working with the HOP (Peoples'
Democracy Party), which is a legal party with over 60 members of Parliament.
The second matter you raise in connection with the first identified area of non-compliance is the
allegation that ACF is advancing and promoting a political ideology associated with the
Kurdistan's Workers Party (PKK), which is listed as a terrorist entity in Canada. You note:
0126-5
.- .,*"·----- - ··--- ------------.,.-.,.,-.,- ---·,.,. .-.,. .,.,_.____, ._.,_. . .,_,c _~

--
'
An analysis of the activities actually being undertaken by this organization •... appears to suggest
a focus, not on relieving poverty ..... but on advancing and promoting the political ideology of the 1
PKK.
You further note that such activities would be considered contrary to public policy and therefore
not charitable. But since you claim that such activities appeared to have become the main focus 1
I
of the organization you maintain that it is the CRA's preliminary position that the organization may
be advancing a collateral non.charitable purpose.
ACF considers this an extremely serious allegation, based on speculation and a fundamental
misunderstanding of the complex situation of the Kurdish people. They submit that their activities
are all charitable - falling under the education and relief of poverty categories, including, and most
importantly, the provision of humanitarian aid. The substantive response to these allegations is
set out below in the response to 1.3.
1.3 Political activities and activities contrary to public policy
Under this third area, you maintain that the ACF may have knowingly or unknowingly extended
benefits to fund the activities of organizations that are linked to or openly support the PKK and or
armed militia groups and political groups that are closely aligned with the PKK, a listed terrorist
entity.
You have further set out the basis for the foregoing conclusion - first by reason that the ACF
provided support to organizations that may be used to support such efforts and second, by
alleging an absence of due diligence on the part of ACF.
The ACF responds to the various allegations as follows.
1.3.1 Support to organizations whose resources may be used to support the efforts of a
political organization, armed militia groups and/or listed terrorist entity.
a. Rojava Media Project (RMP}
In regards to this project you state that while the RMP appears, on the surface, to be about
providing young people with media production equipment, training, and venues of publication, a
review of the RMP's online presence appears to suggest a political focus on •raising awareness
about the struggle of the Kurds in Rojava and empowering the young Kurds and other ethnic
groups in Rojava to advance their struggles by creating their own media." You conclude from that
analysis that RMP suggests an alternative political purpose- more specifically, that RMP is a
venue to promote Kurdish autonomy in the region or at least the struggle to achieve it.
You refer to several scenes from the video of the trip to the region and conclude that such scenes
"appear to promote the PKK and the revolution in Rojava." You quote Sardar Saadi - the person
responsible for RMP- and conclude from his words - when he says the RMP seeks to provide a
0126-6 ·
-----------------------------------·---··------- ---~
medium for making the voices and vision of Rojava heard - you interpreted that he was speaking
of the vision of those that are aligned with the PKK and/or the YPGNPJ.
The substantive response to the foregoing allegations from Sardar Saadi is attached as
Appendix 2. It provides the context in which the project originated end explains the nature of the
work undertaken by RMP in Rojava - which is primarily educational, but also represents activities
that seek to foster an understanding of human rights issues through the dissemination of reports,
materials, documentary films and discussions. Mr. Saadi also clearly articulates the basis for the
work and adamantly denies any political purpose. He clearly disassociates himself from the PKK.
b. Kurdish Community Centre
CRA maintains that the ACF has a close relationship with the Kurdish Community Centre of
Toronto (KCC) and that the KCC is a supporter of the PKK.
ACF maintains that its relationship to the KCC Is minor and stems from the fact that there is a
small community of Kurds in Toronto. The charity does not and never has sponsored the Toronto
Kurdish Community Center. Rather, and like many businesses and professionals in the
community, it sponsored the Kurdish Peace and Cultural Festival, in furtherance of ACF's first
mandate - ", to advance the knowledge and understanding of Kurdish language, literature, art,
theatre and cultural traditions" which is in keeping with the CRA Ethno-Cultural poticy.2 Its ·
objective was never to provide funding for any other reason.
The Peace and Cultural festival was only supported in the early years. The support for the
program was discontinued - not because the ACF believed the KCC to be a supporter of the PKK
but rather because the directors believed that their involvement as a charity could be at risk
because of the KCC's need to engage political figures in the events. The ACF was concerned
about partisanship. Instead they decided to have their own cultural and educational activities.
c. Foreign Intermediaries
CRA maintains that ACF relied on foreign intermediaries to act on their behalf in engaging in
foreign activities and alleges that these intermediaries have ties to the PKK or political groups
associated with the PKK.
Mr. Bekir Kaya
Bekit Kaya was involved in ACF's purchase and transfer of the fire truck to the city of Van, Turkey
in November of 2012, following the deadly earthquake that had occurred there in October and
November of 2011. Shortly after the earthquake, ACF was involved in a major fundraising effort
2
https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/charities-giving/charities/policies-
guidance/charltable-work-ethnocultura l-groups-lnformatlon-on-reglste ring-a-cha rity.html#tocl3
I
0126-7 I
-'" ''. .)-A-.....,....,..d_. .*i!l:IIJ?B'1~~,-·_____________ l::r.lM:
....._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .J....----...<
_,¥_,""_,""')"l~.t:lia~~.- "_ _ _ _ _ _ ...,..,,,.._'t.f
to assist the people of Van. Members of ACF participated in a press conference with then MP Jim
Karygiannis to begin the fundraising. 3 Mr. Dogan Dogan, a key early member of the organization,
participated in the press conference along with Seyfi Tomar, the president of ACF at that time,
and was authorized to travel to the City of Van to see how the funds could be best spent to assist
those affected by the earthquake.
He met with the elected officials from the Municipal government to determine the best use of the
funds for the community in Van. Food was purchased and distributed with the assistance of over
20 volunteers under the direction of the ACF representative on the ground, Dilan Batgi,
Approximately 2067 families were assisted.
During the fundraising campaign, ACF had neither an office or phone line and so used the direct
lines of the president and Mr. Dogan Dogan. People who contacted the KCC for information were
directed to these numbers.
Bekir Kaya, the mayor of Van, was one of the elected officials that members of ACF met with in
Van. The ACF maintains that he was a well-respected public figure at the helm of the city at the
epicenter of the earthquake. The representatives from ACF met with many officials, including /
officials from the department of Fire and Rescue. The fire truck was requested due to the fact th~t
the temporary shelters for the victims of the earthquake - supplied by the government - were .
flammable. There were many resulting fires and deaths. In ACF meetings with the officials, ACF!
representatives were informed that the city had a very old and not properly functioning fire fleet, :
which was the cause of many infant deaths from the fires.
l
J
ACF maintains that they had no knowledge of Bekir Kaya's alleged ties to the PKK. The
government charged and jailed Bekir Kaya based on "alleged" connections with the PKK (the
case is ongoing). In making this allegation, the CRA relied on open source information from Pre s
TVs website which is the Iranian government official website - a government which is also kno'Af1
for human rights violations against the Kurds. Many respected human rights organizations /
however have in fact commented on the arrest of elected officials on such grounds as a tactic
used by Turkish officials - noting that how under the name of fighting against terrorism, Kurdish
elected officials have been purged and imprisoned.4
The fire truck is the property of the Municipal government. The ACF decision to provide the fire
truck was based solely on humanitarian concerns - aimed at saving lives. Jim Karygiannis was
present when ACF publicly transferred the truck to the municipal Fire Department. He tweeted
3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA- 7QeH9A_I_
4
See these reports:
A. a Report by Turkey's Human Rights' Foundation, IHD: http:l/lhd.org.tr/en/index.php/2016/12/20/ihds-report-on-
the-prison-vlsit-made-to-arrested-mps-and-mayors/ -
B. Page 4, 16 and especially page 22 of this UN report about elected officials:
http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Co!,lntries/TR/OHCHR S_Quth-East TurkeyReport 10March2017.pdf
C. This report from Human Rights Watch: https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/03/20/turkey-crackdown-kurdish-
opposition
0126-8
5
about the transfer. He is prepared to speak on behalf of the organization - in particular to
to the fact that it was they who raised the money, purchased the truck in accordance with the
atter
needs of the municipal government and delivered and transferred the truck to the appropriate
authorities.
Mr. Atilla Firat
Mr. Firat was involved in the use of the charity's resources for the scholarships in 2013 and 2014.
Attila Firat is currently an employee of the Turkish Parliament working with the HOP (Peoples'
Democracy Party), which Is a legal party with over 60 members of Parliament. At the time of the
scholarship program, Atilla Firat was a member of Confederation of Public Workers' Unions
(KESK) when he first contacted the ACF's president at that time, Adnan Kaya, who was also a
close personal friend. Mr. Firat asked if the ACF could provide help with the many poor students
that regularly apply for financial support from the KESK organization, and after reviewing his
proposal, ACF decided to run a scholarship program based on the 31d and 4th objects -the
mandate to fight against poverty and to provide humanitarian aid as well as to advance education
for an impoverished group. The ACF established terms and conditions of the scholarships (a copy
is attached as Appendix 1) and gave Mr. Firat the authority to act on their behalf in providing
names of eligible students and to administer the funds on behalf of ACF to those students chosen
by the President. Funds were transferred to the students monthly through Mr. Firat. Although they
originally considered 30 plus students they were only able to fund 20 for one year and only in the
amount of $900 per month. This accounts for the total amounts transferred to Mr. Firat over 2013
and 2014 - $18000.
The selection of Atilla Firat is clear and understandable. He is an employee of the Turkish
Parliament and a member of a legal political party and a personal friend of the then President of
ACF. The funds were spent for charitable activities under the direction and control of the charity.
Mr. Faruk Tatli
The CRA maintains that Faruk Tatli - the head of Suruc Municipality and the International
Coordinator for Rojava - is a member of various groups that appear to promote the cause of the
PKK- specifically, the PYO, the Democratic Union Party, that established Rojava as the defacto
Kurdish enclave in Syria in 2013. The CRA maintains that since the ACF failed to demonstrate
direction and control over the resources sent to Suruc, they have concerns over who has received
those goods.
When the ACF organized the clothing donation campaign to send clothing containers for people in
need after the war began in Syria, Suruc municipality was the chosen recipient of their containers
as Suruc municipality was running refugee camps for refugees coming from Kobane, Syria,
' located right across from Suruc. Faruk Tatli was the legal representative of Suruc municipality. He
was the main person to contact and he was responsible for signiing all the receipts and contracts
that they have received the containers. The decision to connect with Mr Tatli was not political- he
being the only person to connect with to provide needed humanitarian aid in a conflict zone.
Legally and officially, Suruc municipality and Mr. Tatli were those that could handle the clothing
5
https://twltter.com/jlmkaryglannis/status/269013432643239937
9
0126-9
donations in Suruc and distribute it among refugees. The ACF was not aware of any connection
between Mr. Tatli and the PKK.
d. Key Members of the Organization
The CRA maintains that key members of the ACF have publicly supported the PKK.
The ACF submits that the organization does not and never has supported the PKK or their violent I
tactics in asserting the rights of an oppressed people. As noted previously, the situation with i
respect to the oppression of the Kurdish people is complex and historic. And the views of the ·
Kurdish diaspora in Canada, in solidarity with their families and people facing oppression in
Turkey, Syria, Iran and Iraq, is totally understandable. But it does not mean that they support
violence to achieve political ends. Nor does it mean that the organization supports those means to
an end.
Below are the responses by the named members of the ACF community, which raised concerns
with the CRA. Note that neither is a supporter · in any way shape or form - of the PKK.
Adnan Kaya
Adnan Kay was the president of the organization during relevant times of the audit.
Response from Adnan Kaya:
My tweets do not represent my political beliefs and/or organizational affiliations. Those tweets
were sent during a time that the Kurds were under the immediate threat of genocide from the
most vicious group, the ISIS. They had already massacred thousands of Yazidis in Sinjar in
August 2014. It was during such intense emotional times for Kurds all around the world that ~
moved by those Kurdish groups who were actively fighting against the ISIS. My sympathy came
w1
from this fact.
Dogan Dogan
Dogan Dogan was actively involved in the organization at the outset and was authorized to act for
ACF during the Van earthquake. He has not been involved in ACF since 2012.
Response from Dogan Dogan:
In regards to the tweets I made in 2016, I confinn that this does not in any way indicate my
support for the PKK. I have studied in the US and lived in North America for the past 29 years. I
consider myself a Human Rights Defender, however; I do not support armed or any other violence
to reach any social, political and religious or national objectives. The Turkish government
criminalizes Kurds in any way possible to restrict their basic rights and freedoms, ones that we
enjoy here in Canada. However, our basic rights to freedom of expression should not be unfairly
depicted as being supporters of an organization that uses armed struggle as the means of
reaching a political objective. All of my efforts have been directed to supporting Kurds to have the
0126-10
·---------------=-------------------'i-.•" •~;<t~~
basic rights of speaking their language and living their culture, as well as practicing their religion
1
in Turkey, that is part of upholding basic human rights. ·
Maras Commemoration Event
The Maras Massacre commemoration, is an event to which all Kurdish and Alevi community were
invited. I am a non-Muslim Alevi and joined this commemoration because of the massacre in
Maras which was for the Alevi believers who were not Muslim.
1.3.2 ~bsence of Due Dlllgence
The CRA maintains that the ACF failed to act with due diligence as required and that they failed to
make any efforts to investigate the merits of their funding recipients/intermediaries particularly
since they are operating in politically volatile and war-torn regions. The CRA maintains the
concerns are heightened by the allegations that key members are supportive of the PKK.
The ACF relies on its previous submissions in answer to these claims. They maintain that in every
instance they acted diligently - and compassionately in their efforts to provide aid to their people
in need as a result of natural disasters or being in combat zones. This includes in particular, the
situation in Rojava where the enemy of the Kurdish people were Isis - the most reviled terrorist
entity in the past decade. They either personally knew people, dealt with elected representatives,
or de facto representatives where they had little choice if they were to supply needed goods to
refugees.
1.4 Gifts to Non-Qualified Donees/ Lack of Direction and Control
The CRA maintains that in accordance with its audit findings, the ACF failed to maintain directioj
and control over resources gifted to non-qualified donees both in Canada and in Rojava.
a. Payment of services related to the Kurdish Peace and Cultural Festival
This event occurred in 2011 shortly after the organization received its charitable registration and
at a time when they had no office or formal administration.
Dogan Dogan - an active member at the time -was involved early on in this project. ACF felt that
by supporting the festival they would be engaged in activities in regard to object 1 of their
purposes. However, the ACF did not sponsor the Toronto Kurdish Community Center. Rather,
and like many other Kurdish organizations, businesses and professionals, ACF sponsored the
Cultural Festival based on ACF's mandate to promote the Kurdish Culture, Folklore, and Music as
well as celebrate the contribution of Kurds into the Canadian society. AC F's objective was never
to provide funding for any other reason.
11 .
0126-11
The festival application for reserving the park was based the previous year's application which
was made by the KCC. The receipts for the toilet and other expenses, waste management and
the noise permit similarly continued from the previous years and the volunteers who have called
to make the arrangement provided the name of the community center as it was the only
. organization existing in Toronto to serve the community.
The ACF has previously explained its reasons for not being involved in the Festival after 2011 .
b. Gifts in Kind
Fire Truck
The CRA has concerns about the donation of the fire truck to the City of Van after the earthquake
in 2011 . The CRA maintains that the funds sent to a company in Turkey that produces parts for
the fire truck was not supported by documentation to show that the funds were used for that
purpose.
The ACF asserts that it provided sufficient documentation - the agency relationship contract, and
the receipt of the fire truck by the city of Van. It should be noted that a former MP - Jim
Karyigiannls was present at the ceremony where the truck was handed over to the municipality.
Mr Karygiannis is available to attest to the fact.
The power of attorney was required by the bureaucracy to complete the process. Indeed it was ~e
who signed the donation agreement on behalf of the ACF.
The existence of gaps is largely attributable to the complicated bureaucratic processes that
needed to be attended to - the fact remains that the truck was purchased by ACF - and delivered
to the city of Van. There are pictures and potential attestations by a former MP.
Clothing Donation
The CRA expressed concern over the donation of clothing etc to Rojava because of the violence,
instability regarding the political situation and apparent presence of the PKK and like-minded
political parties in the region.
As noted earlier, when the ACF organized the clothing donation campaign and sent clothing
containers, Suruc municipality was the recipient of the containers as Suruc municipality was
running refugee camps for refugees coming from Kobane, Syria, located right across from Suru •
Faruk Tatli was the legal representative of Suruc municipality. He was the main person - in fact
the only person - to contact and he was responsible to sign all the receipts to confirm that they
have received the containers. The use of Mr. Tatli was not a political choice - the ACF had no
alternative if it wished to donate goods to the refugees in the area. He was the official and legal
representative. Suruc municipality and Mr. Tatli were those that could handle the clothing
donations in Suruc and distribute it amongst refugees.
12
0126-12
------------- ----'-.-------~------- - - - · · · · - . . . . _ , - ,.. I ..,

2. Failed to maintain and provide Books and Records as required
The CRA indicated that the audit identified a number of deficiencies with respect to the
organization's books and records. They claimed that the ACF either did not maintain or was
unable to provide books and records sufficient for the CRA to verify income, expenses, donations
and use of resources.
a) During the years 2011 and 2012, the ACF did not have adequate financial advice and
accounting services so the books and records for that period were inadequate. The T301 O that
was originally filed failed to comply with CRA requirements.
b) Although the original documents were inadequate, the ACF maintains that it submitted
corrected T3010s and revised records to show how funds were spent for the earthquake.
c) The ACF agrees that it was not able to provide a detailed description of each fundraising
activity or expenses associated with it for that period due to the fact that its financial records were
inadequate. This changed in 2014 after the current accountant took over the responsibility.
2.1.2 Fiscal Period ended Dec 31, 2012
a) The discrepancies noted resulted from inadequate accounting during this year and despite
efforts to correct the reporting, there were still problems.
b) The ACF was unable to obtain the events expenditures receipts- again by reason that
there was inadequate record keeping during the first years of operation.
2.1.3 Fiscal Period ended Dec 31 2013

a) The ACF maintains that it submitted an account of the expenses in response to the audit.
b) The ACF acknowledges that it did not provide all of the information requested with respect
to the scholarship program as a result of an oversight. A copy of the terms and conditions of the
scholarship program if found in Appendix 1. Each of the original 54 applicants for the
scholarships were contacted directly by the then president of the ACF to determine eligibility and
only 20 were selected and to receive less money than was originally planned for. The ACF's
agent monitored the students over the year to ensure that they continued to be entitled to the
scholarship funds.
2.1.4 Fiscal Period ended December 31, 2014

The ACF believes it provided the necessary documentation for the events in 2014 in response to
the audit request.
The ACF is in a far better position now to ensure that its books and records are in keeping with
CRA requirements.
01 26-13
..... -..,,-_-,--;"c"rx:•.-,. ~..:.- . . - . , , , - · - ~ ~ - - - - - --. ~ --- - ·.... ~~· - - - - -...... ,,.. •.,,..• • _ . _ ~ _ . . - . . .... - - - - - · , _ - _ , . , ____ ,. ___.,,.._....,.,.._ _ _ . _ . . , ... ...-...~
•
·I
3. Issuing Receipts not in accordance with the Act
The ACF has now corrected its receipts to include the missing information.
4. Registered Charity Information Return T301 O
4.1 En-ors and Omissions
a) and b) The ACF acknowledges that there errors and omissions on the T3010s for 2011 and
2012 and has made best efforts to correct those with new filings.
4.2 Late FIiing T30~0
The ACF acknowledges the fact that they have always been late in filing their T3010. As noted
previously, given the volunteer nature of the organization, it has been difficult to comply with this
requirement. However, the ACF now appreciates the gravity of the situation and undertakes to
comply with the requirements in the future. The 2016 T3010 will be filed this week. The delay was
exacerbated by the audit response requirements.
Conclusion
The ACF is fully aware that there have been weaknesses in its documentation and record-keeping
and has every intention of making changes to improve its compliance with CRA requirements.
We trust you will give the foregoing due consideration and look forward to receiving your
response. My clients and I would be happy to sit down with you to discuss any or all of the
concerns raised.
Yours very truly,
cc llnas Ulutas, President, ACF
Attachments:
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
,..
0126-14
!
I
Appendix 1
Anatolian Cultural Foundation - Scholarship Program - Terms and Conditions
Overview
1. The scholarship award (the "Scholarship") shall be in the amount of $2,500 and will
be awarded by ACF at the beginning of the academic year, to be renewed at the end of each
academic year. The Scholarship may cover room and board, other living expenses, books or
materials fees, transportation, or other costs not included in tuition ("Living Expenses Stipend"),
subject to the availability of funding, at the sole discretion of ACF.
2. Up to twenty-eight (28) Scholarships will be granted to eligible students by ACF in

accordance with the selection criteria described below (the "Scholarship Program").
3. The specific terms and conditions of the Scholarship will be contained in a letter
sent to each recipient of a Scholarship (individually, the "Recipient" and collectively·, the
"Recipients"). The Recipient will be required to review the terms and conditions and communicate
acceptance of the Scholarship in writing to ACF. I
4. Failure to fulfill the requirements, as described below, of the Scholarship Program
at any point during the four-year academic period will result in forfeiture of the remainder of the
Scholarship.
Eligibility Criteria
5. The Scholarship Program is available to Kurdish students who reside in Kurdistan,

namely, a region or city witrun Turkey, Iran, Iraq or Syria that is predominantly Kurdish [NTD: Or
alternative - who reside in Turkey, Iran, Iraq or Syria.]
6. Students must have received acceptance, conditional acceptance, or must be

enrolled in a four (4) year diploma or degree program in an eligible, accredited post-secondary
education institution located in Kurdistan. [NTD: Or alternative - institution located in Turkey, Iran,
· Iraq or Syria)
7. Students who are entering or continuing in a bachelors program must be 25 years

or younger and those who are entering a masters degree must be 30 years or younger.
8. Student must demonstrate financial need.
9- Students must submH a two (2) pa9e Jetter outJinin9 how they meet each of the
eligibility criteria and specifying their study program. High importance will be placed on the
applicant's desire to advance in their education, with an emphasis on those applicants who ha¥~
demonstrated a commitment to developing the linguistic and cultural rights of the Kurdish
population in the countries in which they reside. The letter must include the following supporting
documents:
15
0126-15
---·----- ------~ " '·- ----

........... ....
'
I
I
I
,I
I'
• photocopy of diploma - either high school diploma or bachelor's degree diploma
• transcripts for the past two (2) academic years showing the subjects studied and
the marks or grades obtained each year
• · a photocopy of an identity document (birth certificate, passport or residence perrnit) I

• Recommendation letters from community leaders, organizations, teachers or
I I
employers
I
Requirements and Renewal
1o. Students must be enrolled full time each semester according to the requirements of
their chosen college or university.
11. Students must maintain continued satisfactory academic standing within that
institution. Students shall forward to ACF a copy of their transcripts at the end of each academi9
year. I
12. Students may be required to participate in an internship with ACF or a related non-
governmental institution promoting Kurdish rights during the school year and engage in
networking and promotional activities identified by ACF and may be responsible for written
material from time to time as may be requested from ACF (NTD: For comment].
13. Payment of the Scholarships, or parts thereof, will be made directly to the college
or university in which the Recipient is matriculated and enrolled on an annual basis before the
start of each school year, save and except any Living Expense Stipend shall be made directly to
the Recipient at the start of each school year or semester.
14. To maintain eligibility for the Scholarship, Recipients must conduct themselves in
ways that promote academic excellence. The ACF reserves the right to revoke the Scholarship in
the event the actions of a Recipient are at odds with the objectives and aims of the ACF and/or
are capable of bringing the ACF into disrepute, at the sole discretion of the ACF.
15. The Recipient shall not contact individual donors to the ACF Scholarship Program
without the express consent of, and within the guidelines established time to tim.e by, the ACF.
Assignees
16. The ACF reserves the right to assign the administration of the Scholarship
Program in whole or in part to a non-governmental organization or institu·tion located in Kurdistan
that shares the objectives and aims of the ACF, provided that the assignee organization assumes
the Dbligatk>ns of ACF and agrees to be administer the Scholarship PrO{}ram in accordance with
the Terms and Conditions established herein.
0126-16
···"·-----· --.·---··- - -
17. No individual or institutional donor to the Scholarship Program may contact a
Recipient except in strict accordance with the guidelines established time to time by the ACF or its
assignee.
17
0126-17
·-----------~-· · ··-·--------- ·----·- ----

... . .... ..
Appendix 2
Response to section 1.3.1 (a) Rojava Media Project
Since its initiation, the RMP has carried out two projects: first, the fore mentioned educational
project in Rojava, the Kurdish region of Syria, and second, an educational project in a refugee
camp for Yazidis in Diyarbakir, Turkey. Only the first project was financially supported by the
ACF; yet, the RMP has worked in coordination with the ACF throughout Its life. In both
projects, the RMP has aimed to provide basic means and trainings of documentary filmmaking
for Kurdish youth in high conflict areas of the Middle East to empower them to document their
stories of struggle and make their voices heard. In fact, the participants of the second project
were young Yazidi girls who had fled their city of Sinjar after the ISIS terrorists invaded their
city and massacred Yazidi people.
The CRA suggests that the RMP has "an alternative political purpose" and having a political
focus on raising awareness about the struggle of the Kurds in Rojava and empowering the
young Kurds to advance their struggle. With that, they conclude that the RM P's work is in
support of a political organization or purpose, particularly of the PKK. In citing various things
as the basis for this conclusion, the CRA imputes a political meaning to the word •struggle."
Struggle does have a powerful meaning, but it is not a political term. To further explain, a brief
description of the environment within which the RMP carried out its first project in Rojava is
warranted.
Since the beginning of civil war in Syria in 2011, hundreds of thousands of citizens of this
country have been killed, cities destroyed, and millions have been displaced. A sectarian war
has torn apart this country. Since then, ISIS and other Jihadist groups have posed an
incredible threat against anyone who does not comply with their rule. Starting in 2012, Kurds
in Syria developed their own areas of self-government and defense against these groups. At
the same time, they worked to build a society free from discrimination based on gender,
ethnicity, and religion. In the environment of sectarian civil war that death was praised, and life
and homeland had lost its meaning, the efforts of the people in Rojava promised an alternative
for the people against oppression, displacement, and the ideology of death and destruction.
Their struggle was not just a political or military struggle, but struggle to keep their daily life
going, to preserve hope and determination in the face of an evil group such as ISIS, and to
promise a future that could bring happiness to the people on their own homeland and not
beyond.
During the time when millions were fleeing Syria, I was fascinated by those that chose to stay
on their lands and struggle. "Struggle" in that environment was indeed not just against IS IS,
but also for life against death and for hope against despair. For those young people that RMP
0126-18
~ - - - -- - - - - - - _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _. _ _ . _ __ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _' _ • ~ - I.,
-
~
~
~
-
worked with, it was very important to show the world that they are still there, that they work to
make their society work in a better way, and that they try to be happy and preserve their
human dignity. I wanted to empower them to document their stories and to show their daily
struggle in their own ways. In no way did the use of the word "struggle" here, suggest
providing support for a political organization.
In my view, the foregoing characterization by the CRA - ie. associating the Kurds in Syria
solely with regard to their political organizations - is based on a mistaken and superficial
understanding of the Kurds in Syria, and elsewhere for that matter. No one can deny that
everything in Syria and the wider region, at the time the RMP happened, was about resisting
ISIS, and about those who fight them. And of course, our young participants of the program
wanted to show how their brothers and sisters are doing that.
I
I
It was also during the time that the whole international community, including the Canadian i
government, put all their efforts to stand against the ISi~ terrorists. Given this context, I find it I
incongruent that the CRA accuses the RMP and the ACF of providing resources and support I
for Kurdish "terrorist organizations" while the Canadian government itself promotes any kind of
1
l
humanitarian and even military support for those that have been fighting against ISIS. You
cannot live in that region and not have been under the influence of devastating consequences
of this war on your life. The RMP intended to empower those young Kurds that insist on
staying in their country and who chose to struggle for building a better future for them and to
preserve their Kurdish cultural traditions against all oppressive measures taken against them.
The RMP did not and does not have a hidden and undeclared political purpose; nor does it
have a hidden agenda of providing support for any political organizations. RMP received
$10,000 in total from the ACF. More.than half of this amount was spent on buying equipment
such as one laptop with necessary programs, a DSLR camera, and other video and audio
recording devices. A detailed list of this equipment has been submitted to the CRA. The rest
of this funding went to covering the travel cost and accommodation of Mr. Masood Manaf, an
RMP project assistant at that time, and myself in the region. All the receipts have been
submitted to the CRA. Thus, our work to provide equipment and training was not just "on the
surface," contrary to what CRA implies; it was exactly to provide equipment and training to
young students.
The RMP is not a venue to promote the political project of Kurdish autonomy, as the CRA
claims. The Rojava region is an autonomous region; there is no need for us to promote it. If
the students want to document and show their daily life based on their current situation of war
and resistance or sing the songs that are about their forces that stand against ISIS, it was
definitely not our job to ce~sor them while filming, or edit such passages out.
0126-19
·- ,... ~-"-••- ,w--,. w - - ·------·-·-.,,...,~-----,----"''i-,...,..•~--..-·-·-·-"'-IT'iil-,0-••------,- ..--.1

----
1
I'
I
I
Everything in Rojava is about fighting ISIS terrorists and to preserve the value of life, sociality,
co-existence, and human dignity in the face of the most vicious group on the face of earth.
The RMP gave an opportunity to youth in Rojava to document their stories of living in such
circumstances. The RMP does not •promote• or "glorify" the resistance by the PKK and the
YPG/YPJ. We could only show how these young students of our program are determined to
preserve their culture, music, language, and traditions in the face of an enemy as vicious as
ISi$ that intends to eliminate them from the face of the earth.
A video produced by RMP has been shown as evidence for RMP's promotion of a political J
project or organization. The video is about our travel to Rojava in which most of the scenes I
are filmed by the students and edited collectively. By profession, I am an anthropologist and · j
not a filmmaker. But as an enthusiast in filmmaking who does amateur community work I
around video production, I am sure that there is an accepted principal of the freedom of artistic j'
expression that even goes beyond the universal freedom of expression. When a young group
of students who for the first time handle cameras in their life and want to document their
everyday living conditions and happenings, of course they wanted to show the most obvious
I
happenings in their life: people who die fighting against ISIS and those who still fight. Many of I
our students were coming from families who had lost one or more members in this fight. They .
are incredibly impacted by what was 'going on in their region. The only ones that fight against
ISIS or the military forces of Rojava are members of the YPG that Ideologically follow the
PKK's leader Abdullah Ocalan, but they are not associated with the PKK. Ocalan's pictures
are everywhere in Rojava, and it is a source of inspiration for their resistance. It is normal foi
these young students to show those places where their dead rest forever, for the respect th Ir
people show to their dead, and to have Ocalan's picture at their ceremonies.
The auditor's assumptions once again reveal a limited understanding not only of the political
situation in Kurdistan but about the principals of filmmaking and cultural production as well. tn
the last three years that Kurds have been fighting against ISIS, hundreds of documentaries
and photo series have been produced to show the Kurds resistance against ISIS terrorists.
Canadian media outlets have produced videos and photos that show the YPG/YPJ's fight
against ISIS and the presence of Ocalan in the Rojava region as the honorary leader of the
revolution there. Our students certainly were extremely excited to have this opportunity to
show this resistance. Yet, the video they produced is also - and mainly - about the cultural
resistance in Rojava and has nothing to do with the political and military campaigns in the
region. We, and our students, all felt that without showing the context of their resistance, it is
impossible to talk about the cultural work that the Kurds in Rojava were undertaking.
In fact, our workshops were held in a cultural center in Qamishloo, and it was during the tim,
people were celebrating an important date. It was the best opportunity for our students to filrll
their cultural activities in preparing for their celebration of August 15th. And yes, it is a
20 ·
0126-20
~-.- -,. .. .-....,.....-,-· ~-~-

, , ___., ·----- ~------- -·--·-- -·........-----------
significant day for the Kurdish movement that has inspired the people of Rojava, but our video
of the cultural activities for this event that coincided with the time of our workshop is a mere i
form of documentary filmmaking. Nobody on the video was promoting a political project, an9
the scenes in the video were the real happenings in Qamishloo and very significant for our
students to document and show. Had the filming occurred during normal times and,
circumstances, I am sure our students would have filmed their relatives' wedding parties or
other celebrations.
The CRA maintains that speakers of an event organized by the RMP on November 1, 2014,
were promoting Rojava Revolution and its political implications. The auditor quotes two others
and myself at the event and concludes that there is reason to believe that I support the PKK.
This is based on the following quotes:
• First quote concerns me - I have expressed "our obligation" to make the voices of the
people of Rojava heard. Let me begin to say that I believe that the voices of the Kurds in
the region have been historically silenced and oppressed - and as a people, have been
denied basic human rights. I think one of the main commitments of any Kurd in diaspora is
to be the voice of their people in the region given the freedom of expression in western
countries such as Canada. As a Kurdish-Canadian, I am privileged to live in Canada,
outside of the many oppressive regimes that dominate our homeland. My work in this
project is not about showing support for the PKK, and I have never intended to do so.
• Regarding the quote from Saye Sky - he is a rap artist giving an artistic performance an1
has no connection to the RMP. Saye Sky is not Kurdish; he is a Persian artist. It was a
spontaneous request on behalf of him to perform during the event. This event was held
when Kobane in Rojava was under ISIS' siege and the whole world was talking about the
heroic resistance of the Kurdish people against ISIS.
• The other speaker quoted in this part in from the late Prof. Amir Hassanpour, a highly
respected Kurdish academic who devoted his entire life to research and writing about
Kurdish language, culture, and their right of self-determination. Prof. Hassanpour was
invited to this event because of his work about the Kurds, and he was the first Kurd in
Toronto that anyone would gladly invite to speak about the situation of the Kurdish people
in the region and in diaspora. He has been interviewed by Canadian mainstream media
and worked as an expert witness in many cases in Canadian courts. He has numerous
publications in which beside supporting the Kurdish right to self-determination and to
practice their cultural traditions freely, he has been critical toward Kurdish political groups.
0126-21
The ACF and the RMP cannot separate their work and activities from the people they try to
support and raise awareness about, but at the same time, they have seriously considered
their work and activities to be according to the Canadian laws and all the rights and freedoms
in this country, such as freedom of expression.
0126-22

Anatolia Cultural Foundation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Anatolia Cultural Foundation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Anatolia Cultural Foundation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Agence du revenu

l+I Canada Revenue

Subject: Notice of intention to revoke

Canada A350 E (08)

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraphs I68(1)(b), I68(l)(c),

Business number Name

Tax and Charities Appeals Directorate

However, a copy of the revocation notice, described above, will be published in

A copy of the relevant provisions of the Act concerning revocation of registration,

As of the effective date of revocation:

c) the Organization will no longer qualify as a charity for purposes of subsection

• Appendix B, Relevant provisions of the Act

Mr. Ilhan Ulutas

Ms. Khenaw Rahmati

This Appendix contains:

1.1 Advancement of an unstated purpose

The Organization's Representations

• the selection criteria used for awarding monetary scholarships to students;

Formally established in Turkey in 1978 by Abdullah Ocalan, the Kurdistan Workers

a) CRA's position - the Rojava Media Project (RMP)

Appendix 2- Response to section 1.3.1 (a) Rojava Media Project

I) be established for the purpose of promoting or defending human rights; and

First, the Organization is not established to educate, uphold, or "foster an understanding of

Educating people from a particular political or moral perspective may be educational

It is well established at law that a registered charity cannot be considered to be operating in

b) CRA's position - the Kurdish Community Centre of Toronto

An analysis of the scholarship transfer documents provided by the Organization indicates

The Organization has failed to adequately address these concerns:

4) The Organization's failure to provide the requested documentation in furtherance of its

Regarding the transfer of resources to scholarship recipients, the Organization represented

Documents provided by the Organization in its Janumy I 2, 2015, submission contradict

all have been contradicted by the Organization's own documentation.

Our position remains unchanged for the following reasons:

CRA's Position - Foreign Intermediaries - Bekir Kaya

42Wan is the Kurdish name for Van, Turkey.

a) conducted its due diligence prior to transferring resources;

c) The Organization failed to provide any additional records to substantiate that it

CRA 's position - Foreign Intermediaries - Faruk Tatli

Charities have to remember their obligations under Canada's anti-terrorism

a) Payment of services related to the Kurdish Peace and Cultural Festival

CRA's position - Gifts in Kind

Our review of the documentation provided indicate:

In the absence of documentary evidence demonstrating direction and control, it is our

1) The Organization failed to provide sufficient information to demonstrate that it

2. Failed to maintain and provide books and records as required

2013 and 2014 Fundraising activities

3. Issuing Receipts not in accordance with the Act

The Organization's receipts were missing:

4.1 Errors/omissions on Form T3010, Registered Charity Information Return

4.2 Late filing of form T3010, Registered Charity Information Return

Fiscal period end Due date Date filed

Section 149.1 Qualified Donees

149.1(2) Revocation of registration of charitable organization

149.1(3) Revocation of registration of public foundation

(i) in the course of charitable activities carried on by it, or

(i) in the course of charitable activities carried on by it, or

149.1(4.1) Revocation of registration of registered charity

168(1) Notice of intention to revoke registration

168(2) Revocation of Registration

168(4) Objection to proposal or designation

172(3) Appeal from refusal to register, revocation of registration, etc.

180(1) Appeals to Federal Court of Appeal

188(1) Deemed year-end on notice of revocation