Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 27 views

    ND ND

    Uploaded by

    Software King
    The High Court of Karnataka heard a criminal petition filed by Dinesh Chandra seeking to quash proceedings in a private complaint lodged against him relating to an investigation ordered by a magistrate under Section 156(3) of the CrPC. The Court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner could challenge the magistrate's order through a statutory revision petition before the Sessions Court as an alternative remedy. The Court reserved the petitioner's right to pursue this remedy and left all contentions open.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    ND ND

    Uploaded by

    Software King
    27 views3 pages
    The High Court of Karnataka heard a criminal petition filed by Dinesh Chandra seeking to quash proceedings in a private complaint lodged against him relating to an investigation ordered by a magistrate under Section 156(3) of the CrPC. The Court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner could challenge the magistrate's order through a statutory revision petition before the Sessions Court as an alternative remedy. The Court reserved the petitioner's right to pursue this remedy and left all contentions open.

    Original Description:

    prart

    Original Title

    CRLP3354-15-11-06-2015

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The High Court of Karnataka heard a criminal petition filed by Dinesh Chandra seeking to quash proceedings in a private complaint lodged against him relating to an investigation ordered by a magistrate under Section 156(3) of the CrPC. The Court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner could challenge the magistrate's order through a statutory revision petition before the Sessions Court as an alternative remedy. The Court reserved the petitioner's right to pursue this remedy and left all contentions open.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    27 views3 pages

    ND ND

    Uploaded by

    Software King
    The High Court of Karnataka heard a criminal petition filed by Dinesh Chandra seeking to quash proceedings in a private complaint lodged against him relating to an investigation ordered by a magistrate under Section 156(3) of the CrPC. The Court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner could challenge the magistrate's order through a statutory revision petition before the Sessions Court as an alternative remedy. The Court reserved the petitioner's right to pursue this remedy and left all contentions open.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    1

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

    DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015

    BEFORE

    THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA

    CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3354/2015

    BETWEEN:

    SRI DINESH CHANDRA


    S/O LATE V.S. LAKSHMINARAYANA RAO
    AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
    R/AT NO.1152, 2ND MAIN
    2ND BLOCK, BEL LAYOUT
    VIDYARANYAPURA
    BENGALURU – 560 097. ... PETITIONER

    (BY SRI V.B. SHIVAKUMAR, ADV.)

    AND:

    1. M/S. MAHARAJ SOAPS


    INDUSTRY PVT. LTD.
    REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
    SRI ELANGO @ RAVIRAJ
    S/O E.M. PANDYAN
    AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
    PLOT NO.768/500
    LOKIKERE MAIN ROAD
    NEAR INDUSTRIAL AREA
    DAVANGERE – 577 005.

    2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA


    REP. BY THE POLICE
    SUB INSPECTOR, VNPS
    DAVANGERE – 577 005.
    ... RESPONDENTS
    (BY SMT. ANITHA R., HCGP FOR R2)
    2

    THIS CRL.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C.


    PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN PCR
    NO.9/2015 ON THE FILE OF III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
    AND JMFC, DAVANGERE, RELATING TO A PRIVATE COMPLAINT
    LODGED BY THE RESPONDENT FOR INVESTIGATION BEFORE
    THE POLICE SUB INSPECTOR, DAVANGERE UNDER SECTION
    156(3) OF CR.P.C.

    THIS CRL.P. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE


    COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

    ORDER

    Cognizance of the offences against the petitioner

    having been taken by the learned Magistrate, this petition

    was filed seeking quashing of the reference made under

    Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. vide Annexure-A. The order, as at

    Annexure-A, cab be the subject matter of consideration in

    a revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C. before the Sessions

    Judge.

    In view of the availability of alternative and statutory

    remedy, as above, in terms of the decision in Urmila Devi

    vs. Yudhvir Singh, (2013) 15 SCC 624, this petition is

    disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail the

    said remedy.
    3

    All contentions raised in the petition are left open.

    Certified copies produced along with this petition be

    returned to the learned advocate for the petitioner.

    Sd/-
    JUDGE

    ca

    You might also like