International Law
International Law
International Law
acknowledged that the trade custom has established the bill of lading as a
Document
document of title to the goods agreed to be delivered to the consignee. |Case: Lickbarrow v Mason
can be changed or cancelled by the bank that issued it at any time and for any
reason Revocable
Letter of Credit
cannot be changed or cancelled unless everyone involved agrees Irrevocable
Art IV (1)| carrier shall not be liable for loss or damage arising
unless caused by want of due diligence on the part of the carrier to make the ship Provide a Seaworthy vessel
seaworthy
Protect Cargo
Carrier
Without unreasonable deviation
Reasonable dispatch
Factory -> Carrier --> Alongside Ship -- > On Board (Seller covered until on board)
exporter delivers the goods to the importer once the goods have been shipped on board a named vessel FOB (Free On Board)
delivers the goods to the importer once the goods have been placed along side of
FAS (Free Alongside Ship)
the vessel
seller is responsible for providing insurance coverage for the goods while in transit
CIF (Cost Insurance Freight) INCOTERM (2010)
for 110% of their value
-1-
(a) Convention
(b) Custom Opinio Juris Practice ones usually won't act but feel compelled to under the law : Self-defense
Case: Continental Shelf (Libya v Malta case); the world court stated that: Customary International Law must be looked for primarily in the actual practice and Opinio Juris of State
(d) Judicial Decision and Writing of Jurist Judicial Decision (JD) International/municipal (Domestic) law/ Publication
Does not refer to Domestic Decision but does invoke previous case law
Proposal to one or more specifics person indicate intention of offeror to be bound in case of acceptance
Art 14 -
If no specific person is mentioned, it merely invitation to treat
Any Conduct indicating assent to an offer is acceptance within certain period e.g. Payment to seller
Art 18
Silent is not acceptance
Formation of the contract
Acceptance Reply to offer as acceptance but contain modification (Quantity, Price) is
considered rejection to the offer and constitute as counter offer
Art 19 However, if contain additional or different terms, no alternation to material (Qty, price, payment, quality and quantity of the goods, place and time of delivery,
Price, Color,etc) is considered acceptance unless offeror object to it orally extent of one party’s liability to the other or the settlement of disputes are
immediately considered to alter the terms of the offer materially
Consideration
Art 60 Facilitate the delivery Must take actions to enable delivery and take the delivery
Reasonable time
-2-
can be used with any mode of transport including sea, land, air, rail and multimodal transportation.
Transfer to buyer first good loaded to first carrier But risk or loss Seller also pay insurance
seller to pay the costs and freight necessary to transport goods to the named port of destination
CFR Trade Terms
Buyer pay for insurance
Risk of loss transfer when the goods are loaded to first vessels
Bill of Lading
Hague Rule
Carriage Goods by Sea
Visby Rule
More favor to carrier Adopt Hague Rules (1924) Malaysian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (MCOGSA)
Transportation
Airways Bill Carriage Goods by Air
Charterparty Ship
Marine Insurance Insurance
Physical Injury
dead freigh- If there is less than a full load, a dead freight charge may be imposed
on the charterer and payment for freight is by volume
Holder acquires bill of lading obligated to pay for charges before ship turn ver voyage charterparty
the cargo
- charges that the charterer pays to the shipowner for its extra use of the vessel.
form of liquidated damages for breaching the laytime set out in the governing Demurrage Charterparty
contract
-3-
goods as required by the contract and
this Convention.
Obligation
Certificate of Origin
Art 31 - Hand over docs
Bill of Lading
Fixed| Period |
Art 33 Delivery Date . Delivery period was Oct 97/Feb 98. Goods were ready ex factory in late Oct. Buyer
could not arrange L/C until 30 Nov. Buyer collected goods (juice), but did not
examine until taken home (US). Juice lost colour.
Seller
Case: Cherubino Valsangiacomo vs. American Juice Import (2003) Since it was an ex factory contract, the buyer should have examined the good after
he had received. The delay to lodge complaint about the loss of colour was
unreasonable (bad faith)).
(1) The seller must deliver goods in conformity with the quality, quantity and
description required by the contract
(2) Except where the parties have agreed otherwise
Art 35 Conformity of goods
(3) Conform with contract if they
Case:
the seller may, even after the date for delivery, remedy at his own expense any
Buyer
failure to perform his obligation
Art 50 To reduce the price, Art 48(1) Or Art 37 If the Buyer refuse to accept performance as accord to the article, the buyer may
not reduce price
(1) Buyer may refuse or take the delivery if seller deliver the goods before date fixed
CISG
Art 52 (2) Buyer may reject or take the delivery of excess quantity by seller| If taken all of
part of excess quantity, must pay at contract price
other party may declare the contact avoidable if it is clear that one of the parties
(1) will commit fundamental breaches
Remedies
(2) Party declaring contract avoidable must give reasonable notice to the other party
Art 72 Avoidance in anticipation of a fundamental breach
Above Requirement does not apply if the other party has declared that he will not
(3) perform his obligation
failure of one party to perform any of his obligations in respect of any instalment
-4-
-5-
failure of one party to perform any of his obligations in respect of any instalment
Both
constitutes a fundamental breach of contract and other party may with respect
Art 73 Avoidance of an installment contract to that instalment declare the contract avoided.
including loss of profit, suffered by the other party as a consequence of the
breach
Art 74 Such damages may not exceed the loss which the party in
breach foresaw or ought to have foreseen at the time of the conclusion of
the contract,
Damages.
If contract avoided , within reasonable time he party claiming damages may
recover the difference between the contract price and the price in the substitute
Art 75 transaction as well as any further damages recoverable under article 74.
Natural Disaster
beyond his/her control
Irresistibility
Unpredictability
not something he/she could have reasonably taken into account at the time of
Excuse for Nonperformance (Force majeure ) contracting Riot
Interference by official
Externality
he/she remains unable to overcome the impediment
beyond the control and without the negligence of the party
Engage in resolution
Dispute Settlement Mediatation Mediator:
Investigate and make settlement proposal to the parties
-6-