Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 82 views

    Manifestation & Motion: Former Nineteenth (19) Division

    Uploaded by

    Mark Lojero
    The document is a motion filed by the private respondent's counsel requesting that the Court of Appeals resolve the motion for reconsideration without the petitioners' comment. It summarizes that the Court previously required the petitioners to file a comment on the motion for reconsideration within 10 days, but they failed to do so. Therefore, the motion requests that due to the petitioners' non-compliance, the court resolve the motion for reconsideration without their comment. It also requests that any late-filed comment be expunged from the record.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Manifestation & Motion: Former Nineteenth (19) Division

    Uploaded by

    Mark Lojero
    82 views2 pages
    The document is a motion filed by the private respondent's counsel requesting that the Court of Appeals resolve the motion for reconsideration without the petitioners' comment. It summarizes that the Court previously required the petitioners to file a comment on the motion for reconsideration within 10 days, but they failed to do so. Therefore, the motion requests that due to the petitioners' non-compliance, the court resolve the motion for reconsideration without their comment. It also requests that any late-filed comment be expunged from the record.

    Original Description:

    csc

    Original Title

    Certiorari Csc

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a motion filed by the private respondent's counsel requesting that the Court of Appeals resolve the motion for reconsideration without the petitioners' comment. It summarizes that the Court previously required the petitioners to file a comment on the motion for reconsideration within 10 days, but they failed to do so. Therefore, the motion requests that due to the petitioners' non-compliance, the court resolve the motion for reconsideration without their comment. It also requests that any late-filed comment be expunged from the record.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    82 views2 pages

    Manifestation & Motion: Former Nineteenth (19) Division

    Uploaded by

    Mark Lojero
    The document is a motion filed by the private respondent's counsel requesting that the Court of Appeals resolve the motion for reconsideration without the petitioners' comment. It summarizes that the Court previously required the petitioners to file a comment on the motion for reconsideration within 10 days, but they failed to do so. Therefore, the motion requests that due to the petitioners' non-compliance, the court resolve the motion for reconsideration without their comment. It also requests that any late-filed comment be expunged from the record.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Republic of the Philippines

    COURT OF APPEALS
    Cebu City

    FORMER NINETEENTH (19TH) DIVISION

    LEYTE LUMBER YARD and


    HARDWARE, INC. and
    RUBEN L. YU,
    Petitioners,

    -versus- CA-G.R. SP. No. 05182


    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
    COMMISSION and REMEGIO
    GO,
    Respondents.
    x----------------------------------------- x

    MANIFESTATION & MOTION

    PRIVATE RESPONDENT, by Counsel, to this Honorable Court,


    respectfully states: THAT---

    1. The Resolution of this Honorable Court promulgated on 23


    April 2012 specifically states:

    “Before acting on private respondent’s Motion for


    Reconsideration of the Decision rendered by this Court on
    January 17, 2011, petitioner is hereby required to file his
    Comment thereon within ten (10) days from receipt
    hereof. Upon receipt by this Court of such Comment, said
    Motion shall be deemed submitted for resolution.”
    (underscore supplied)

    2. Petitioners’ counsel filed his Compliance, stating for the


    record that he received a copy of the Resolution dated 23 April 2012
    on 08 May 2012.

    3. Until the present, the petitioners failed to file their Comment


    to the private respondent’s Motion for Reconsideration.
    4. In view thereof, for failure of the petitioners to comply with
    said Resolution of this Honorable Court, it is respectfully prayed that
    the Motion for Reconsideration be deemed submitted for the
    resolution of this Honorable Court sans petitioners’ comment.

    5. Should any Comment be filed belatedly hereafter, it is


    likewise prayed that the same be ordered expunged from the records
    for serious non-compliance of the aforesaid Resolution.

    RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

    Tacloban City (for Cebu City). 4 June 2012.

    LEO S. GIRON
    Counsel for Private Respondent
    ROA # 37379
    IBP Lifetime No. 00733
    PTR No. 7097670; 1-3-12; Tacloban City
    MCLE Compliance No. IV-0005511; 4-23-12
    253 Avenida Veteranos, Tacloban City

    COPY FURNISHED: (by registered mail due to lack of messengerial service)

    ATTY. PHIO L. VIOVICENTE


    Counsel for the Petitioners
    3762-C, Cuenca St., Palanan, Makati City

    You might also like