Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi A Moderate Voice From The
Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi A Moderate Voice From The
Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi A Moderate Voice From The
net/publication/264647383
CITATIONS READS
2 279
1 author:
Ana Soage
Suffolk University (Madrid Campus)
60 PUBLICATIONS 60 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Ana Soage on 31 October 2017.
Abstract
Dr Yusuf al-Qaradawi is one of the most prominent and respected religious scholars in the
Muslim world, particularly amongst so-called moderate Islamists. In this article, we start by pro-
viding a summary of his biography, including the influence of the Muslim Brothers Society on his
political and intellectual development. We will then explore his key ideas, notably the adoption of
the term wasatiyya or ‘middle way’ to describe his position vis-à-vis the main questions facing both
Muslims and Islam. Finally, we will take a look at his attitude towards those who not share his
vision, which exemplifies the less appealing aspects of his thought.
Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawı is possibly the Islamic scholar best known in the Muslim
world today. To a great_ extent, he owes his fame to his regular appearances in al-Jazeera’s
religious program, al-Sharıa wa’l-Hayat. However, even before the launch of the
Arabic news channel, he was already _ a respected scholar who had written dozens of
volumes.
Al-Qaradawı has played an important part in the so-called Islamic awakening which,
starting in _the early 1970s, has gradually islamized – to a greater or lesser degree – practi-
cally all Arab and Muslim countries. The sheikh has written a number of books hoping
to guide the awakening (e.g. For the sake of a mature awakening; The Islamic awakening
from adolescence to maturity) and to mediate in its internal disagreements (e.g. The Isla-
mic awakening between legitimate disagreements and reprehensible disunity; The Islamic
awakening between rejection and extremism).
Finally, al-Qaradawı is considered the pioneer of the wasatiyya – or ‘middle way’ –
_
trend within Islamism, which rejects both Westernization and _ Islamist fanaticism and
advocates a moderate – but still political – version of Islam.
Biographical Background1
Yusuf Mustafà al-Qaradawı was born in 1926 in a small village of the Nile Delta and was
brought up_ _ within a _poor, deeply family of farmers. He showed his intelligence and
tenacity early in life, and had memorized the Koran by the time he was nine. Back then,
al-Azhar was the only institution providing an education to the children of families of
modest means, and upon finishing his primary schooling Yusuf was able to convince his
uncle – who had taken charge of him after his father’s death and would have wanted
him to learn a trade – to allow him to enroll at the Azhari secondary school in the
provincial capital, Tanta, despite the lack of job prospects that entailed.
It was in Tanta_ that_ al-Qaradawı first came into contact with the Muslim Brothers’
_ _
Society and listened to the fiery _speeches of its founder, Hasan al-Banna. He soon became
a ‘Brother’ himself, which led to spells in prison whenever _ the Society clashed with
successive governments. The first time was in 1948–9, after the assassinations of judge
Ahmad al-Khazandar, who had passed harsh sentences on members of the organization, and
_
Prime Minister Mahmud al-Nuqrashı, who banned the Society following the judge’s mur-
der. The next wave_ of arrests occurred in 1954, as a result of an assassination attempt on
Abd al-Nasir.2 On that occasion, al-Qaradawı was only released in 1956. Finally, he was
imprisoned_ again in 1962 for his alleged involvement
_ in a plot to overthrow Abd al-Nasir.
After his graduation, al-Qaradawı worked first at the Ministry of Religious Endow- _
ments, then at al-Azhar. In 1962 _ this institution sent him to Qatar, and he has lived in
the emirate ever since. He has become a prolific writer, boasting over a hundred titles
with new ones being added to the list every year, and an international celebrity as a regu-
lar guest of al-Jazeera’s religious program, al-Sharıa wa’l-Hayat (Islamic law and life). In
addition, he cofounded and presides the European Council _ for Fatwa and Research and
the International Union for Muslim Scholars, which are mainly concerned with the reli-
gious needs of Muslim communities living in the West.
Al-Qaradawı is widely regarded as one of the Muslim Brothers’ main ideologues. He
_ offered the position of General Guide of the Society several times but has
has even been
always declined. In fact, the sheikh claims that he has left the organization, explaining
that he aspires to be the guide of all Muslims and not just a group of them.3 In any case,
the Society’s founder, Hasan al-Banna, was probably the figure that influenced the
_ as the next section will show.
sheikh’s trajectory the most,
Thus conceived, al-Qaradawı argues, Islam is suitable to every period of time, everywhere
_
– as opposed to other religions, notably Judaism and Christianity, which Muslims consider
superseded by Muhammad’s Revelation.9 The sheikh attacks those who question the
relevance of the Islamic mandates, denouncing the ‘insolence’ of their wanting to ‘steal
from the Koran its quality of eternal’.10 But to be comprehensive, Islam must be continu-
ously (re-)interpreted to adapt it to new and changing circumstances, as we will see next.
teachings and assumptions. That way, he can treat the problems of his time – taking into
account the change of period, place and degree of human development, naturally.18
Thus al-Qaradawı argues that renewal should not seek to supersede tradition, but to strike
_
a balance between tradition and modernity. That endeavor to achieve an equilibrium
leads us to the sheikh’s main contribution to Islam: the concept of wasatiyya.
_
Wasatiyya
_
The main contribution of al-Qaradawı to Islamism is his popularization of wasatiyya,
_
which can be loosely translated as ‘moderation’. _
The term has become a bit of a cliché,
invoked to legitimize all kinds of institutions and events. However, it is al-Qaradawi who
has been dubbed ‘the spiritual father of the wasatiyya trend’.19
The term wasatiyya is derived from the Koran, _ in which God states: ‘Thus We have
appointed you a _ middle nation (ummatan wasatan), that ye may be witnesses against
mankind, and that the messenger may be a witness _ against you.’ (2:143). However,
sheikh al-Qaradawi traces his version of wasatiyya back to Muhammad’ Abduh and his
disciple Rashıd Rida, and uses it to denote an_ equilibrium between
_ the fixed dogmas of
_
Islam and the changing conditions of life:20
Wasatiyya is the [right] balance between mind and the Revelation, matter and spirit, rights and
_ individualism and collectivism, inspiration and obligation, the text [i.e. the Koran and
duties,
the Sunna] and personal interpretation [ijtihad], the ideal and reality, the permanent and the
transient, relying on the past and looking forward to the future.21
Al-Qaradawı also uses the term wasatiyya to refer to one of the trends within Islamism.
_
He distinguishes _
four: the excommunicating trend (tayyar al-takfır), the immobilist, zeal-
ous one (tayyar al-jumud wa’l-tashaddud), the violent one (tayyar al-unf) and the moder-
ate one (tayyar wasatiyya). Obviously, the sheikh sees himself as belonging to the
moderate trend, which_ he portrays as follows:
[Wasatiyya] represents a combination of Salafism and of renewal, an equilibrium between the
_
fundamentals and change: the fundamentals of Islamic law and the change that occurs through-
out time. […] This trend is not detached from the past, does not turn its back on the present,
and does not neglect the future. Rather, it lives in the present, is inspired by the past and looks
forward to the future.22
Elsewhere, al-Qaradawı refers to wasatiyya is the ‘saving boat’ of an umma (Islamic com-
_
munity) immersed _in tragedies and problems. 23
As for the latter, they are mostly blamed
on the enemies of Islam, as we will see next.
licentiousness was colossal, overwhelming, unstoppable. […] I witnessed how the social life of
my beloved Egyptian people oscillated between the dear Islam that they had inherited,
defended, lived with and cherished for fourteenth centuries and this violent Western attack,
equipped with all the destructive weapons of wealth, prestige, ostentation, pleasure, strength
and means of propaganda.24
Sayyid Qutb was even more generalizing and uncompromising in its attitude towards
non-Muslims – all non-Muslims. In his eyes, the problem was not colonialism but a fun-
damental clash of civilizations:
The people of the Book were against the Muslims at the time of the prophet (peace be upon
him) and are against the vanguard of the Islamic renaissance today simply because they are Mus-
lims who believe in God […] They attack the Muslims for being Muslims instead of Jews or
Christians, and [also] because they are depraved and have distorted the message that God
revealed to them.25
In the eyes of many Islamists, the ‘enemies of Islam’ include not only foreigners but also
those Muslims who question the relevance of certain aspects of the Islamic heritage and
argue that Muslim states have much to learn from the West. This was one of the main
themes of Rashid Rida, who used harsh language against those whom he saw as under-
mining Islam. For instance, this was the introduction to his review of Alı Abd al-Raziq’s
Al-islam wa-usul al-hukm (Islam and the foundations of government), in which the
author argued _against _the caliphate:
The enemies of Islam continue to endeavor to topple its throne, destroy its dominion, invali-
date its laws and enslave the peoples that worship God through its teachings. They resort to fire
and the sword, cunning and deceit, ideas and attitudes. They pervert doctrines and morals,
attack the essence and the character of the Muslim community, and sever all the ties that bind
together individuals and peoples so that they become easier for the covetous to devour, prey to
the beasts of colonialism.26
Al-Qaradawı subscribes to the theory according to which the Islamic world is under
_ describes a global conspiracy in which the enemies of Islam have joined
attack. He
forces:
[T]he Muslim world – from the East to the West and from the North to the South – has been
the victim of a fierce attack that has targeted its countries and all that they hold sacred. It is
an unending war, sometimes open, others, clandestine. A war that all non-Muslim forces –
Jews, crusaders, communists, idolaters – have agreed on, in spite of their differences in other
matters.27
In a work entitled The enemies of the Islamic solution, the sheikh lists the forces that, he
claims, are working against Islam: colonialism, Zionism, communism, the ‘hypocritical’
rulers of the Islamic world and the ‘slaves’ of Western thought.28 Let us look at each of
these groups in turn.
WESTERN COLONIALISM
Al-Qaradawı categorically accuses the big Western capitals of plotting to destroy Islam.29
However, _ he is rather inconsistent in his criticism. Sometimes he insists on the West’s
intrinsic animosity against the Muslim religion, which he traces back to the Crusades, and
it is to that animosity – and not to some more or less legitimate interests – that he attri-
butes Western behavior towards the Islamic world.30 On other occasions, hostility is put
down to ignorance, in which case it would be the Muslims’ responsibility to correct the
West’s distorted picture of Islam.31
But al-Qaradawı contributes to reinforce the equally distorted picture of the West
among Muslims_ when he denounces it as ‘the civilization of the Antichrist’ – who in the
Muslim tradition is one eyed – because, in his view,
[…] it is a one-eyed civilization that looks at life, the individual and creation from a single per-
spective, the materialistic perspective, and forgets that creation has a God, that the individual
has a soul, and that life has an objective: to prepare for the next life, which is better and more
lasting.32
However, al-Qaradawı is always eager to portray himself as a moderate, and he reminds
_ discussions with the People of the Book, i.e. Jews and Christians,
Muslims that in their
the Koran urges them to focus on the points of agreement and to endeavor towards
understanding.33 Furthermore, he sees opportunities to cooperate against ‘the enemies of
faith, preachers of atheism and depravity, supporters of materialism, advocates of nudism,
sexual promiscuity, abortion, homosexuality and same-sex marriage’.34 An example he
likes to quote is the alliance of al-Azhar, the Muslim World League, the Islamic Republic
of Iran and the Vatican during the UN conferences on population (Cairo, 1994) and
women (Beijing, 1995).35
Al-Qaradawı also deplores that Western influence has led to a rift between the Muslim
_ their people. In a work entitled The Islamic awakening between rejection and
rulers and
extremism, first published in 1982 but which continues to be in print, his attitude is
uncompromising:
The rulers, whom God has entrusted with the Muslim peoples, walk down a valley which is
not the valley of Islam. They form alliances with those who challenge God and challenge
those who are allied to God. They get close to those who have distanced themselves from
God and take their distanceç from those who have got closer to God. They advance those
who have degraded Islam and degrade those who have advanced Islam… And they only
remember Islam during the celebrations, pretending in front of their peoples, laughing right in
their faces!36
The sheikh’s criticism has become less virulent in more recent works, but he continues
to condemn the ‘hypocritical’ rulers who pretend to be Muslims but implement
Western-style secularist policies.37 And he contrasts the fervor of the so-called Islamic
awakening – the youth who go to fight jihad, the women who donate their wedding
rings to Islamic NGOs, the preachers who curse the Jews, the Serbs, the Hindus and the
Russians… – with the indifferent attitude of most Muslim governments, which submit to
foreign pressures to serve their own interests.38
SECULARISM
Al-Qaradawı explains that whereas in the West secularism was the result of the emancipa-
_ the power of men of religion, in the Muslim world it is a foreign ideology
tion from
imposed – once again – by foreign powers. He explains that ‘Islam is being forced to bear
the burden of a history which is not its history, of an umma which is not its umma, in a
land which is not its land, the result of conditions it never knew’.39 And in a recent work
about the history of the Arab empire entitled Our calumniated history, the sheikh
denounces ‘the secularists, who are opposed to the sharıa and would want us to import
our values, our ideas, our laws and our traditions from the West’.40 Later, he describes
them as ‘the enemies of the umma, who wish to delete its historical memory […] – and
if they cannot delete [it], they try to distort it’.41 In his eyes, it is only the implementa-
tion of the sharıa that will mean a true end to colonialism.42
The sheikh characterizes the Muslim secularists as an elite alienated from the people.
He describes the cultural associations in the Islamic world as ‘organized by people
estranged from their umma: estranged from their creed, their values and their norms’.43
He denounces ‘a culture that challenges religion’, denouncing Westernization as the most
serious problem confronting Islamic societies.44 And when asked about the assassination
of secularist author Farag Foda, murdered in 1992 due to his controversial writings against
the Islamists, he avoids condemning the crime, instead ‘those for whom being apostates
are not enough and seek to propagate apostasy’.45
COMMUNISM
One might have thought that Communism had lost its importance with the end of the
Soviet Union, but a decade after the fall of the Berlin Wall al-Qaradawı still identified it
as one of the main enemies of Islam.46 He rejects it because of what_ he sees as its materi-
alistic conception of existence, its moral relativism, the tyranny of its regimes, its con-
tradictions…47 And he considers it just another ‘crusading’ weapon to turn Muslims away
from Islam:
[Western crusaders] despaired of converting us to their religion and are now content with
diverting us away from our religion. Since they could not turn us into Christians they try to
turn us into communists, so after the failure of the preachers of Christianity they opened wide
the gates to the preachers of Marxism. Their goal is to destroy us, never mind if it is with red
sickles. Their goal is that we give up the source of our strength and our unity, i.e. Islam.48
As well as being depicted as a weapon of the ‘crusaders’, communism is dubbed ‘the
daughter of Judaism’ – and, the sheikh adds, ‘today the Jews are our main enemies’.49 He
even denounces that it was the Jews that propagated the communist ideology in the
Middle East.50
Al-Qaradawı insists that communism has nothing to offer; even its main positive
feature, the_ championing of the poor, was preceded by the Islamic institution of zakat
(legal alms).51 The sheikh goes as far as speculating that if Marx had had the opportunity
to know Islam, he might have realized the error of his ways.52 paradoxically, just as
Sayyid Qutb seems to have borrowed the Leninist idea of a politically aware, mobilized
vanguard (talıa) leading the way to an Islamic order53arıq (Damascus?: Dar Dimashq,
_
1964?, passim.), al-Qaradawı has adopted Marxism’s historical determinism and speaks of
_
‘the inevitability of the Islamic solution’ (hatmiyyat al-hall al-islamı).54
_ _
ZIONISM
acquisition of land in Palestine.56 And he insists that ‘there can be no dialogue with those
of the People of the Book that are iniquitous and overstep the limits, like the Christians
during the Crusades or the Jews nowadays’.57
However, on other occasions the sheikh’s anti-Semitism seems unrelated to the exis-
tence of the Jewish state. He explains that according to the Koran, the Jews were,
together with the idolaters, the worst enemies of the Muslims.58 Similarly, he character-
izes them as ‘the infidel, cunning, treacherous enemies that the Koran depicted as rebel-
lious against God and His prophets – as well as describing their cruelty, treachery,
fickleness, lying and other vices’.59 Then again, elsewhere he pretends that the Koranic
verses that attack the Jews should be interpreted in their historical context, and that the
current conflict between Jews and Muslims is because of a dispute over land and has no
religious basis.60
In any case, al-Qaradawı considers Zionism the most dangerous of the enemies of
Islam.61 He denounces the_ two alleged strategies pursued by the Jewish state that Muslims
must be aware of and oppose: the establishment of Greater Israel and the naturalization
with the Arab world.62 Regarding the latter, he writes:
What is the meaning of ‘naturalization’? It means to render something natural. And how can
the unnatural become natural? How to turn the relentless enemy into a friend? How can the
thief become the friend of the owner of the house he has robbed? What does Israel want? The
Zionist entity pretends to become integrated in the area by changing the peoples of the umma
psychologically and intellectually, so that they accept that hostile, usurping entity.63
To deal with such an enemy, all methods are legitimate. Al-Qaradawı has even defended
suicide attacks against Israeli civilians, arguing that, in reality, Israel_ is a militarized state in
which there are no civilians.64 Unsurprisingly, such statements have cost him much good
will, especially in the West, and have contributed to travel bans to the United States and
the United Kingdom.
Confronted with the threats he has identified, al-Qaradawı argues that Muslims have
one chance to recover their lost strength and their past glory: _ the Islamic awakening.
Nasserists and communists. Through a combination of persuasion, coercion and the pro-
vision of social services, the Islamists were able to impose their puritanical version of
Islam in campuses and beyond.
The Islamic Groups ran summer camps to indoctrinate their supporters and attract new
recruits. For the coaching of their members, they used texts like al-Qaradawı’s already-
mentioned The Islamic awakening between rejection and extremism.65 _In that work,
Islamist radicalism is attributed first and foremost to the failure of Egyptian society to
implement Islam:
We must be brave and admit that it was often our behavior that pushed those youth to what
we call ‘extremism’: We call to Islam but do not practice it. We read the Koran but do not
execute its mandates. We pretend to love the prophet (peace be upon him) but do not follow
his example. We write in our constitutions that the religion of the State is Islam but do not give
it the place it deserves in government, legislation and education. […] We should start by
reforming ourselves and our societies according to what God ordered before demanding from
our youth calm, level-headedness, equanimity and moderation.66
The sheikh remind us that he has been keen to ‘guide the awakening (sahwa)’ ever since
the 1970s.67 To that end, he has written works such as For the sake of _a mature awak-
ening,68 The Islamic awakening between legitimate disagreements and reprehensible
disunity69 or The Islamic awakening from adolescence to maturity,70 just to cite those
with the word ‘sahwa’ in the title.
_
Al-Qaradawı rejects the arguments of the ‘secularist’ – i.e. non-Islamist – authors that
_
have analyzed the sahwa phenomenon. These have attributed it to a number of causes
_ one by one: economic, explanation that he rejects as reduction-
that the sheikh dismisses
ist; psychological, although he recognizes the traumatic impact of the 1967 defeat in the
Six Days War; political, particularly the role of Egyptian president Anwar Sadat – which,
he points out, does not explain the awakening before Sadat’s rule or in countries other
than Egypt71… He prefers to put down the sahwa to the umma’s divine origin and
mission: _
It is a feature of our umma to be woken up by Islam and for Islam […] This umma has been
hit by terrible crises72 from the beginning of its history [...] but has always been able to over-
come the factors of internal weakness and external aggression and turn the defeats into victories,
weakness into strength, division into unity, dispersed members into a giant body.73
That is the core of al-Qaradawı’s message: That Islam constitutes the Muslim umma’s
source of strength and that _the failure to implement its message is behind the Islamic
world’s current state of weakness and dependency – a message difficult to argue with in
Muslim societies, which not only continue to be profoundly religious but have also
witnessed the failure of the political projects imported from the West. At the same time,
the fact that al-Qaradawı derives his legitimacy from the Koran and the Sunna makes it
_
difficult for him to compromise with those who do not share his vision.
Short Biography
Ana Belén Soage holds two degrees, in Politics and Translation, from London Metro-
politan University and the University of Granada. She is the author of several dozen
academic papers on Islam and Islamism. She is currently in Egypt, conducting PhD
research on the evolution of political Islam with a grant from the Spanish government.
Notes
* Correspondence address: Ana Belén Soage, La Cartuja, Granada, Spain, 18071. E-mail: [email protected]
1
The following biographical information comes from al-Qaradawı’s autobiography, Ibn al-qarya wa’l-kuttab (Son
of the village and the Koranic school), which has appeared in book _ form (Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq, 2004) and has also
been serialized in al-Qaradawı’s own website (http: ⁄ ⁄ www.Qaradawı.net ⁄ site ⁄ topics ⁄ index.asp?cu_no=2&lng=0
_
&template_id=189&temp_type=41&parent_id=) and in that of Islam_ Online (http: ⁄ ⁄ www.islamonline.net ⁄ Arabic ⁄
personality ⁄ 2001 ⁄ 11 ⁄ article1.SHTML [both last accessed 12 ⁄ 4 ⁄ 2009]. Our references are taken from the latter. For
a more detailed summary of al-Qaradawı’s biography, see the author’s ‘‘Shaykh Yusuf al-Qaradawı: Portrait of a
Leading Islamist Cleric’’. Middle East Review _ of International Affairs 12 ⁄ 1, pp. 51-68. _
2
There seems to be substantial evidence that the whole incident was staged by Nasir himself with the help of the
CIA, which also played a role in the 1952 Revolution. See Olivier Carré, Les Frères _ musulmans. Égypte et Syrie
(1928-1982) (Paris: Gallimard, 1983), pp. 61-2.
3
Yusuf al-Qaradawı. Nahnu wa’l-gharb. As]ila sha ]ika wa-ajwiba hasima (Cairo: Dar al-Tawzıya wa’l-Nashr al-Islami-
yya, 2006), p. 206. _ _
4
Yusuf al-Qaradawı, ‘‘Ma[ al-Ikhwan al-Muslimın. Hasan al-Banna shaykh wa-ustadh wa-qa]id’’. In: http: ⁄ ⁄ www.
_
islamonline.net ⁄ Arabic _
⁄ personality ⁄ 2001 ⁄ 12 ⁄ article5.SHTML#4 [13 ⁄ 03 ⁄ 2009]
5
Yusuf al-Qaradawı, ‘‘Qatl al-Khazandar. Khataya al-afrad tulsaq bi’l-Jama[ a’’. In: http: ⁄ ⁄ www.islamonline.net ⁄
Arabic ⁄ personality _ ⁄ 2001 ⁄ 12 ⁄ article8.SHTML#3 _[13 ⁄ 3 ⁄ 2009] _
6
Hasan al-Banna, ‘‘Risalat al-mu]tamar al-khamis’’, in Majmu [ at rasa ]il al-imam al-shahıd Hasan al-Banna (Alexandria:
Dar_ al-Da[ wa, 1998), p. 167. _
7
‘‘Al-muslimun wa’l-[ unf al-siyası, part 1’’. Al-Sharı [ a wa’l-Hayat. 23 ⁄ 5 ⁄ 2004. In: http: ⁄ ⁄ www.aljazeera.net ⁄
channel ⁄ archive ⁄ archive?ArchiveId=92972 [13 ⁄ 3 ⁄ 2009] _
8
Yusuf al-Qaradawı, Al-hulul al-mustawrada wa-kayfa janat [ alà ummatina (Cairo: Maktabat al-Wahba 1977 [1971]),
p. 313. According _ to a hadith_ or prophetic saying, Muslims should enter the toilet with their left foot and leave it
with their right foot.
9
Yusuf al-Qaradawı, Kayfa nata[amil ma[ al-Qur]an al-[ azım (Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq, 2005 [1999]), pp. 63.
10
Ibid., pp. 63-4. _ As an example, he defends Islamic inheritance _ laws (according to which men get twice as much
as women) and polygamy; ibid. pp. 64-5.
11
Hence the name given to the movement they launched: Salafiyya. Nowadays, the term is used to refer to groups
that advocate a literalist interpretation of the sacred texts, i.e. the Koran and the Sunna.
12
Jamal al-Dın al-Afghanı, ‘‘Insidad bab al-ijtihad’’, in Sayyid Hadı Khusraw Shahı, Al-athar al-kamila. Al-sayyid
Jamal al-Dın al-Husaynı al-Afghanı. Vol. VI. Khatirat (Cairo: Maktab al-Shuruq al-Duwaliyya, 2002), pp. 150-1.
13 _
See, for instance, Yusuf al-Qaradawı, Al-d_ ın wa’l-siyasa (2006). Available at: http: ⁄ ⁄ www.Qaradawı.net ⁄
_
site ⁄ topics ⁄ static.asp?cu_no=2&lng=0&template_id=254&temp_type=42&parent_id=12; ‘‘Al-siyasa bayna _al-jumud
wa’l-tatarruf ’’. 26 ⁄ 5 ⁄ 2008. In: http: ⁄ ⁄ www.Qaradawı.net ⁄ site ⁄ topics ⁄ article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=5981&version
_
=1&template_id=119&parent_id=13; _ at bi-intisar al-Islam’’. 24 ⁄ 1 ⁄ 1999. In: http: ⁄ ⁄ www.aljazeera.
‘‘Al-mubashshir
net ⁄ channel ⁄ archive ⁄ archive?ArchiveId=89738 [all last accessed_ 8 ⁄ 3 ⁄ 2009]; Thaqafatuna bayna al-infitah wa’l-inghilaq
(Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq, 2000), p. 53. One could be forgiven for thinking that he would like to be considered _ this
century’s renewer. For instance, his personal website reproduces the enthusiastic letter of one of his devotees, who
addresses him as ‘‘commander [amir] of the preachers of our time’’ and ‘‘renewer of our time’’. See Ahmad Abu
Bakr Al Muslih, ‘‘Risala ilà amır al-du[at fı [ asrina’’, Al-Sharq (undated) http: ⁄ ⁄ www.qaradawi.net ⁄ site _ ⁄ topics ⁄
_ _ _
printArticle.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=3810&version=1&template_id=119&parent_id=13 [last accessed 28 ⁄ 4 ⁄ 2009].
14
‘‘Reform according to Islam’’. Al-Jazeera Net. 20 ⁄ 05 ⁄ 2004. In: http: ⁄ ⁄ english.aljazeera.net ⁄ archive ⁄ 2004 ⁄ 05 ⁄
2008410114555767536.html [last accessed 14 ⁄ 04 ⁄ 2009].
15
Yusuf al-Qaradawı, Hawla qadaya al-Islam wa’l-asr (Cairo: Maktabat al-Wahba, 1992), p. 43.
16
For al-Afghani’s _ take_ on the_ matter, see the quote above. [ Abduh’s position is similar: ‘‘Every Muslim must
understand God from God’s Book, and His Prophet from His Prophet’s words, without mediation from the ances-
tors nor from those who succeeded them.’’ See Muhammad [ Abduh, Al-Islam wa’l-nasraniyya ma[ al-[ ilm wa’l-mada-
niyya, in Muhammad [ Imara, Al-a[ mal al-kamila li’l-im _ am Muhammad [ Abduh. Al-juz _ ] al-thalith. Al-islah al-fikrı
_ ahiyyat (Beirut & Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq), p. 305._
wa’l-tarbawı wa’l-il _ _
17
Al-Qaradawı, Hawla qadaya al-Islam wa’l-asr, p. 44.
18 _
Yusuf al-Qara _awı, Ummatun
d _ a bayna qarnayn (Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq, 2000), p. 225. See also Min ajl sahwa rashida
(Cairo: Dar al-Shur _ uq, 2001), pp. 49-50. _ _
19
Patrick Haenni, ‘‘Divisions chez les Frères musulmans. La nouvelle pensée islamique des déçus de l’expérience
militante’’, Le manifeste des libertés. In: http: ⁄ ⁄ www.manifeste.org ⁄ article.php3?id_article=230 [last accessed
02 ⁄ 05 ⁄ 09].
20
‘‘Al-Islam al-dımuqratı al-madanı’’. Al-Sharı [a wa’l-Hayat 14 ⁄ 12 ⁄ 2004. In: http: ⁄ ⁄ www.aljazeera.net ⁄
Channel ⁄ archive ⁄ archive?ArchiveId=108218#L1 [last accessed 15 ⁄ 4 ⁄ 2009].
21
Al-Qaradawı, Thaqafatuna bayna al-infitah wal-inghilaq, p. 30.
_
Works Cited
‘Abduh, Muhammad. (1993). ‘‘Al-Islam wa’l-nasraniyya ma‘ al-‘ilm wa’l-madaniyya’’. In: Muhammad ‘Imara,
_ amila li’l-imam Muhammad ‘Abduh (eds).
Al-a‘lam al-k _ Al-ŷuz’ al-thalith. Al-islah al-fikrı wa’l-tarbawı _wa’l-ilahiyya, pp.
257–368, Beirut & Cairo: Dar _al-Shuruq. _ _
Muslih, Ahmad Abu Bakr. (2005) ‘‘Risala ilà amır al-du‘at fı ‘asri-na’’, Al-Sharq, http://www.qaradawi.netsite/
Al
_ _
topics/printArticle.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=3810&version=1&template_id=119&parent_id=13 [last accessed 28 ⁄
4 ⁄ 2009].
Al-Afghanı, Jamal al-Dın. (2002) ‘‘Insidad bab al-ijtihad’’, In: Sayyid Hadı Khusraw Shahı (eds), Al-athar al-kamila.
Al-sayyid Jamal al-Dın al-Husaynı al-Afghanı, vol. vi, Khatirat, pp. 150–1. Cairo: Maktab al-Shuruq al-Duwaliyya.
Al-Banna, Hasan. (1966) Mudakkirat al-da’wa wa’l-da‘iya (Cairo: _ Dar al-Shihab).
—— (1998)_ ‘‘Risalat al-mu’tamar al-khamis’’. In: Maŷmu‘at rasa’il al-imam al-shahıd Hasan al-Banna Alexandria: Dar
al-Da‘wa. _
‘‘Al-mubashshirat bi-intišar al-Islam’’. 24 ⁄ 1 ⁄ 1999. Al-Jazeera Net. In: http://www.aljazeera.net/channel/archive/
archive?ArchiveId=89738 [last accessed 8 ⁄ 3 ⁄ 2009].
Al-Qaradawı, Yusuf. (1944) Al-thaqafa al-’arabiyya wa’l-islamiyya bayna al-asala wa’l-mu‘asira. Cairo: Maktabat al-
Wahba. _ _ _
—— (1977 [1971]) Al-hulul al-mustawrada wa-kayfa janat ‘ala ummati-na. Cairo: Maktabat al-Wahba.
—— (1987) Dars al-nakba al-thaniya. Li-madha inhazim-na.. wa-kayfa nantasir. Cairo: Maktabat al-Wahba.
—— (1988) Bayyinat al-hall al-islamı wa-shubuhat al-‘almaniyya wa’l-mutagharribiiyin._ Cairo: Maktabat al-Wahba.
—— (1992) Hawla qaday _ a al-Islam wa’l-‘asr. Cairo: Maktabat al-Wahba.
—— (1997) _‘‘Al-wasa_tiyya fı’l-Islam’’, Al-Sharı‘a wa’l-Hayat. 26 ⁄ 10 ⁄ 1997. In: http://www.aljazeera.net/channel/
_
archive/archive?ArchiveId=91751 [last accessed 12 ⁄ 07_ ⁄ 2010].
—— (2000a) A‘da’ al-hall al-islamı. Cairo: Maktabat al-Wahba.
—— (2000b) Ummatu-n _ a bayna qarnayn. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
—— (2000c) Thaqafatu-na bayna al-infitah wa’l-inghilaq. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
—— (2001a) ‘‘Ma‘ al-Ikhwan al-Muslim_ın. Hasan al-Banna shaykh wa-ustadh wa-qa’id’’. Islam Online. In: http://
_
www.islamonline.net/Arabic/personality/2001/12/article5.shtml#4 [last accessed 13 ⁄ 03 ⁄ 2009].
—— (2001b) ‘‘Filistın. Ñina‘at al-maut’’. Islam Online. In: http://www.islamonline.net/Arabic/personality/2001/
12/article6.SHTML _ [last accessed 18 ⁄ 04 ⁄ 2009].
—— (2001c) ‘‘Qatl al-Khazandar. Khataya al-afrad tulsaq bi’l-Jama‘a’’. Islam Online. In: www.islamonline.net/
arabic/personality/2001/12/article8.shtml#3 _ _ 13/3/2009].
[last accessed
—— (2001d) ‘‘Min Taur ilà Hikstep.. Rihla qasiya la tunsà’’. Islam Online. In: http://www.islamonline.net/arabic/
_
personality/2001/12/article11.shtml [last_ accessed 02 ⁄ 05 ⁄ 2009].
—— (2001e) Min ajl sahwa rashida. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
—— (2001f) Al-sahwa_ al-isl _ amiyya bayna al-ikhtilaf al-mashru‘ wa’l-tafarruq al-madhmum. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
—— (2001g [1982]) _ _ Al-sahwa al-islamiyya bayna al-juhud wa’l-tatarruf. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
—— (2002a) Al-sahwa al-isl _ _ amiyya min al-murahaqa ilà_ al-rushd. Cairo:
_ Dar al-Shuruq.
_ _
—— (2002b) ‘‘Al-khitab al-islamı fı ‘asr al-‘awlama’’, Al-Sharı‘a wa’l-Hayat (22 ⁄ 12 ⁄ 2002). In: http://www.
_ _
aljazeera.net/Channel/archive/archive?ArchiveId=91431 [last accessed 24 _⁄ 07 ⁄ 2010].
—— (2004a) Ibn al-qarya wa’l-kuttab. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq. Also available in al-Qaradawi’s website (http://
www.qaradawi.net/site/topics/index.asp?cu_no=2&lng=0&template_id=189&temp_type=41&parent_id=) and in
that of Islam Online (http://www.islamonline.net/Arabic/personality/2001/11/article1.SHTML) [both last
accessed 08 ⁄ 03 ⁄ 2009].
—— (2004b) ‘‘Al-muslimun wa’l-‘unf al-siyası, part 1’’. Al-Sharı‘a wa’l-Hayat. 23 ⁄ 05 ⁄ 2004. In: http://www.
aljazeera.net/channel/archive/archive?ArchiveId=92972 [last accessed 25 ⁄ 07 _ ⁄ 2010].
—— (2004c) ‘‘Al-muslimun wa’l-‘unf al-siyası, part 2’’. Al-Sharı‘a wa’l-Hayat. 30 ⁄ 05 ⁄ 2004. In: http://www.
aljazeera.net/channel/archive/archive?ArchiveId=92986 [last accessed 25 ⁄ 07 _ ⁄ 2010].
—— (2004d) ‘‘Reform according to Islam’’. Al-Jazeera Net. 20 ⁄ 05 ⁄ 2004. In: http://english.aljazeera.net/English/
archive/archive?ArchiveId=3779 [last accessed 14 ⁄ 04 ⁄ 2009].
—— (2004e) ‘‘Al-Islam al-dımuqratı al-madanı’’. Al-Sharı‘a wa’l-Hayat. 14 ⁄ 12 ⁄ 2004. In: http://www.aljazeera.
_
net/Channel/archive/archive?ArchiveId=108218 [last accessed 12 ⁄_07 ⁄ 2010].
—— (2005a) ‘‘‘Ilaqat al-muslimın bi’l-yahud’’. Al-Sharı‘a wa’l-Hayat. 19 ⁄ 01 ⁄ 2005. In: http://www.aljazeera.net/
channel/archive/archive?ArchiveId=112577 [last accessed 24 ⁄ 07 _ ⁄ 2010].
—— (2005b [1999]) Kayfa nata‘amil ma‘ al-Qur’an al-‘azım. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
—— (2006a) ‘‘Lam ad‘u li’l-‘unf wa-nushaddid ‘alà al-gha _ db al-‘aqil’’. Al-Qaradawi Net. 11 ⁄ 02 ⁄ 2006. In: http://
_
www.qaradawi.net/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=4161&version=1&template_id=104&parent_id=15
[last accessed 12 ⁄ 07 ⁄ 2010].
—— (2006b) Nahnu wa’l-gharb. As’ila sha’ika wa-ajwiba hasima. Cairo: Dar al-Tawziyya wa’l-Nashr al-Islamiyya.
—— (2006c) _‘‘Al-dın wa’l-siyasa’’. Al-Qaradawi _ Net. In: http://www.Qaradawı.net/site/topics/static.asp?
cu_no=2&lng=0&template_id=254&temp_type=42&parent_id=12 [last accessed 12 ⁄ 4 ⁄ 2009].
—— (2006d) ‘‘Al-islah wa’l-musaliha fı’l-sharı‘a al-islamiyya’’, Al-Sharı‘a wa’l-Hayat (27-12-2006). In: www.
_ _ _ _
aljazeera.net/Channel/archive/archive?ArchiveId=1036217 _
[last accessed 24/07/2010].
—— (2006e [2005]) Tarı khu-na al-muftarà ‘alay-hi. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
—— (2007) Fı fiqh al-aqalliyyat al-muslima. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
—— (2008a) ‘‘Al-siyasa bayna al-jumud wa’l-tatarruf’’. 26 ⁄ 5 ⁄ 2008. Al-Qaradawi Net. In: http://www.Qaradawı.
_
net/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=5981&version=1&template_id=119&parent_id=13 [last accessed
12 ⁄ 4 ⁄ 2009].
—— (2008b) Kalimat fı’l-wasatiyya al-islamiyya wa-ma‘alimu-ha. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
_ musulmans. Egypte et Syrie (1928–1982). Paris: Gallimard.
Carré, Olivier. (1983) Les Frères
Haenni, Patrick. (undated) ‘‘Divisions chez les Frères musulmans. La nouvelle pensée islamique des déçus de
l’expérience militante’’, Le manifeste des libertés. In: http://www.manifeste.org/article.php3?id_article=230 [last
accessed 14 ⁄ 07 ⁄ 2010].
Qutb, Sayyid. (1964?) Ma‘alim fı’l-tarıq. Damascus?: Dar Dimashq.
—— (1982) Fızal al-Qur’an. Beirut_ & Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
_
Rida, Rashıd. (1925-6) Al-Manar vol. xxvi. Cairo: Matba‘at al-Manar fı Misr.
_
Soage, Ana Belén. (June 2007) Faraj Fawda, or the cost _ of freedom of expression.
_ Middle East Review of International
Affairs 11(2), pp. 26–33.
—— (March 2008) Shaykh Yusuf al-Qaradawi: Portrait of a Leading Islamist Cleric. Middle East Review of Interna-
tional Affairs 12(1), pp. 51–68.