Professional Ethics in Auditing
Professional Ethics in Auditing
Professional Ethics in Auditing
Introduction
The general public demand professional accountants1 maintain a high ethical standard in order to maintain
public confidence in the accountancy profession. Professional accountants are required to comply with the
Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants issued by the Hong Kong Institute of CPAs. Any member that
fails to comply is liable to be investigated by the Institute, resulting in possible disciplinary action such as an
order to remove the name of the member from the Institute’s membership register.
Fundamental Principles
The fundamental ethical principles that apply to all members as well as guidance on the threats and
safeguards relating to those fundamental principles. Professional accountants are required to abide by the
following five fundamental principles:
(a) Integrity
professional accountant should be straightforward and honest in all professional and business
relationships.
(b) Objectivity
professional accountant should not allow bias, conflict of interest or undue influence of others to
override professional or business judgments.
(d) Confidentiality
professional accountant should respect the confidentiality of information acquired as a result of
professional and business relationships and should not disclose any such information to third
parties without proper and specific authority unless there is a legal or professional right or duty to
disclose.
(a) Self-interest threat, when a professional accountant, or an immediate or close family member, has
a financial or other interests
(b) Self-review threat, when a professional accountant re-evaluates his own judgement
(c) Advocacy threat, when a professional accountant promotes an opinion that compromises his own
objectivity
(d) Familiarity threat, when a professional accountant, due to a close relationship, becomes too
sympathetic to the interests of others
(e) Intimidation threat, when a professional accountant is threatened from acting objectively
Other than clearly insignificant threats, a professional accountant should apply safeguards to either
eliminate or reduce the threat to an acceptable level so that the fundamental principles are not
compromised. Safeguards fall into two categories:
(a) Safeguards created by the profession, legislation or regulation, such as professional standards,
continuing professional development, and education and training (b) Safeguards in the work
environment
(b) The purpose of safeguards is to increase the likelihood of identifying or deterring unethical
dilemmas. However, if a professional has violated the Code without knowing he or she has done so,
once discovered the professional accountant must make immediate remedial action, including
setting up further safeguards. The violation may or may not compromise compliance dependent on
the nature and significance of the matter.
Examples of potential threats include circumstances where the second opinion is:
- not based on the same set of facts that were made available to the existing auditor
- based on inadequate evidence