Appeals: Appeals From The MC
Appeals: Appeals From The MC
s. 316 CCP – An appeal does not lie from the order of a criminal court except
as provided by the CCP / by any other law
An appeal on a question of law lies in all cases except in the case of whipping
s. 318 – No appeal lies form an acquittal by a MC except at the instance / with the
written sanction of the AG.
s. 320 – A party can prefer an appeal against the final judgment of a MC for any error in
fact / error in law
Date of order is also taken into account – Sundays & public holidays are
excluded ; s. 321
Appeal lies only against the final order decree / judgment of MC.
No appeal against
- an order discharging D under s. 153
- an order committing D for trial under s. 154
s. 319 – Where a MC refuses to issue process – a mandamus lies to compel MC to issue
process. But an appeal does not lie against the refusal of MC to issue process
except at the instance / with the written sanction of AG.
- In an appeal against conviction – CA can reverse verdict & sentence & can
acquit D / order D to be re-tried.
CA can also alter sentence maintaining the verdict
Sentences passed in appeal cannot exceed the sentence which might
have been awarded by the court of first instance
* In counting the 14 days – must include day of judgment but all public
holidays are excluded.
(1) CA must allow the appeal against the conviction of a jury if CA thinks that the
verdict of the jury must be set aside on the ground that
(2) If CA allows an appeal against conviction in a jury trial – CA must quash the
conviction & direct a judgment of acquittal to be entered.
BUT
CA can order a fresh trial if CA is of the opinion that there was evidence before
the jury upon which D might reasonably have been convicted but for the
irregularity upon which the appeal was allowed.
YET CA can order a fresh trial when the trial at which the conviction was had
was a nullity due to any defect in the constitution of the court / otherwise
; s. 334 (3)
(3) If CA thinks that D, though not properly convicted on some charge / party of the
indictment in a jury trial, but has been properly convicted on some other
charge / party of the indictment – court can
* affirm the sentence passed on the D at the trial
* pass a sentence in substitution of the original sentence as may be
warranted by the part of the indictment / charge that D has been properly
convicted of.
(4) If jury has convicted of an offence & CA thinks that on the facts, the jury could
have convicted D of another offence – CA can instead of allowing / dismissing
the appeal – substitute for the verdict found by the jury a verdict of guilty of the
other offence.
CA can pass a sentence in substitution of the sentence passed at the trial but it
must not be a sentence of greater severity than that passed at the trial.
(5) On the conviction of D, if the jury has found a special verdict & CA considers
that a wrong conclusions has been arrived at by the trial court on the effect
of the special verdict of the jury – CA can instead of allowing the appeal –
order the right conclusion to be recorded & pass sentence in substitution of
the sentence passed by the trial court as is warranted in law on the special
verdict.
(1) If CA considers there is no sufficient ground for interfering with the decision of
the HC judge – CA must dismiss appeal
(ii) Find D guilty of the same offence he has tried for / different offence which D
could have been found guilty on the indictment & pass sentence according to
law.