Writ - Railways Department - 30-05-2018 - Care of Y. Kamala Rani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HTYDERABAD
For the state of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh
WP.NO. OF 2018
BETWEEN:
1. Union of India, Rep. by the Chairman,

M/o Railways, Railway Board,
Rail Bhavan, New Delhi.
2. The General Manager,

South Central Railway,
Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad.
3. The Principal Chief Personnel Officer,

Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad
… Petitioners
AND
1. G. Yesumani, D/o G. Chandrappa,

Aged about 53 years, Occ: Chief Matron,
Office of the Medical Director,
Central Hospital, South Central Railway,
Lallaguda, Secunderabad.
2. K. Padmalatha, W/o K. Bala Bhaskar,

3. B.R. Swarnalatha, W/o D. Vikram Kumar,

4. Georgina Francis, W/o T.G. Francis,

5. P. Shantilatha, D/o Adinarayana Patnaik,

6. B. Padmavathi, W/o B.L. Narasimha Rao,
7. B. Saimala, W/o B. Venkata Ramana,

8. A. Mary Kalyani, D/o Late A.L. Marianna,

…Respondents
AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONER
I, _____________ , S/o ______________, Aged about ___

years, Chief Personnel Officer, South Central Railways, Rail Nilayam,
Secunderabad, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on
oath as follows.
1. I am the Chief Personnel Officer of the South Central Railways

and petitioner herein and as such well acquainted with the facts of the
case. I am authorized to depose this affidavit on behalf of the Railway
Department.
2. I submit that the present writ petition is filed challenging the

action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned order dt. 19-02-
2018 in OA No.021/01447/2014 directing the respondents therein to fix
the pay of the respondents/applicants on a notional basis in the
upgraded pay scale of Rs.7500-12000/- w.e.f. 01-01-2006 and
thereafter on an actual basis in the pay scale of Rs.9300-34800/- with
grade pay of Rs.4800/-, respondents/applicants shall be paid arrears
w.e.f. the date of filing of the OA as illegal and arbitrary.
3. It is submitted that the contention of the respondents 3 to 10 that

revised scales of Nursing Sisters have been upgraded from Rs.5500-
9000 to Rs.7500-12000/- with grade pay is wrong. As the scale is not
applicable in Railway. As per Railway Bd’s Lr. No.PC-VI/2008 RSRP
dated 22-09-2008 (S.C.No.120/2008) have not merged and kept
independently as mentioned below.
Category Pay Band Pay Corresponding Pay Grade

Band Band Pay
Ch. Matron Rs.7500-11500 PB-3 Rs.15600-39100 5400
Matron Rs.6500-10500
Nursing Rs.5500-9000 PB-2 Rs.9300-34800 4800
Sister
Staff Nurse Rs.5000-8000 PB-2 Rs.9300-34800 4600
All the above categories retained the classification as Group ‘C’ only.
4. It is submitted that the respondents quoted RBE No.103/2008.

This Organization i.e. Railways follows the order/instructions of the
Railway Board only and there are o provisions to compare with other
Central Government Organizations.
5. It is submitted that as per S.C.No.108/2008, initial entry grade of

Staff Nurse in Pay Band is Rs.9300-34800+4600 GP, by 100% direct
recruitment and their initial pay is fixed at Rs.17,140/-
(Rs.4600+12,540/-). In accordance with 6th C.P.C., the Grade Pay
allotted to Nursing cadre are as under:
Category Pay Band Grade Pay

Staff Nurse Rs.9300-34800 Rs.4600/-
Nursing Sister Rs.9300-34800 Rs.4800/-
Ch. Matron Rs.15600-39100 Rs.5400/-
6. It is submitted that as per S.C.No.34/2010(1/4) stepping up of

the basic pay of seniors can be claimed only in the case of those cadres
which have an element of direct recruitment. According to the circular,
staff who are drawing GP of Rs.4600/-, has to been fixed at Rs.17,140/-
as on 01-01-2006. As such the Staff Nurses who are appointed prior
01-01-2006 and promoted as Nursing Sisters are drawing less pay than
their juniors appointed on or after 01-01-2006 in the lower grade of
staff nurse.
7. It is submitted that in this connection, matter when referred to FA
& CAO/SC has advised as under:
“The extent rules of stepping up of pay in terms of Para

1316 (FR 22 C President decision 9(ii) of IREC are not applicable
for stepping up of pay of Nursing Sisters in Grade Pay of
Rs.4800/- on par with their junior Staff Nurses in different
grade pay of Rs.4600/- who are drawing more pay”.
The clarification has been sought from Railway Board vide this Office
letter No.SCR/P-HQ/487/VI CPC dated 24-02-2014 as per the advice of
FA & CAO and the reply has not been received from Board. It is the
case of the respondents 3 to 10 that instead of fixing the pay of the
respondents 3 to 10 in the VI CPC on the basis of the upgraded scale of
Rs.7500/--12000/-, the respondents 2 and 3 therein have fixed the pay
of the respondents 3 to 10 herein with reference to the pay of Rs.5500-
9000/- drawn by them in the V CPC as on 31-12-2005 after adding the
grade pay of Rs.4800/- and after multiplying with the factor of 1.86.
Therefore, the OA filed by the respondents 3 to 10 challenging the
fixation made by the railways. We have filed counter duly admitting the
fact the staff nurses who were appointed and got promotions to the
higher grade as Nursing Sisters prior to 01-01-2006 are drawing lesser
pay than the staff nurses appointed after 01-01-2006 and also further
stated that matter has been referred to railway board for clarification
with regard to the same and the same is pending for consideration and
requested for dismissal of the OA as it is premature. However, the
Hon’ble Tribunal by following the judgements rendered by the various
Tribunals allowed the OA. The Tribunal did not adjudicate the issue
independently and allowed the OA merely followed decisions of their
Tribunals. Since the subject matter of OA involves financial
implications, it ought to have directed the Railway Board to take a
decision in the case and ought not to have directed the Railways to fix
the pay. In view of the impugned order of the Central Administrative
Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad, the petitioner is constrained to
approach this Hon’ble Court by way of the present writ petition.
8. The petitioner has no other effective and efficacious remedy than
to approach this Hon’ble Court under article 226 of the Constitution of
India.
9. The petitioner has not filed any writ, suit or other proceedings
seeking the same relief now sought in this writ petition.
For the reasons stated above, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court
may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one
in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st
respondent in issuing the impugned order dt.19-02-2018 in OA
No.021/01447/2014 directing the respondents therein to fix the pay of
the applicants on a notional basis in the upgraded pay scale of Rs.7500-
12000/- w.e.f. 01-01-2006 and thereafter on an actual basis in the pay
scale of Rs.9300-34800/- with grade pay of Rs.4800/-, duly directing
the respondents/petitioners herein to pay the arrears from the date of
filing of the OA, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently set the same
and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and
proper in the interest of justice.
It is further prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to stay

all further proceedings in OA No.021/01447/2014 dt.19-02-2018
passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench,
Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above WP and pass such other
order or orders as this Hon’ble court deem fit and proper in the interest
of justice.
Solemnly and sincerely affirmed

On this ___ day of June, 2018
at Hyderabad. In my presence DEPONENT
Before me
ADVOCATE, HYDERABAD
VERIFICATION
I, R. Guruswamy, S/o Subbaiah, Aged about 57 years, Chief
Personnel Officer/HRD, South Central Railways, Rail Nilayam,
Secunderabad, being the petitioner, acquainted with the facts do hereby
verify and state that the contents of paras 1 to 9 etc., of the affidavit
filed in support of the writ petition are true to my personal knowledge
remaining paras are based on legal advice believed to be correct.
Verified at Hyderabad on this ___ day of June, 2018 at

Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner DEPONENT

MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION
(Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE
OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
W.P.No. of 2018
Between:



… Petitioners
AND







Lallaguda, Secunderabad
…Respondents
The address of the above named petitioner for the purpose of

service of all notices and process etc., is that of his counsel Y. Kamala
Rani ( ), Advocate, Flat No.308, Mehta Towers, Ashok Nagar,
Hyderabad-500020.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the

petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ,
order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of
Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the
impugned order dt.19-02-2018 in OA No.021/01447/2014 directing the
respondents therein to fix the pay of the applicants on a notional basis
in the upgraded pay scale of Rs.7500-12000/- w.e.f. 01-01-2006 and
thereafter on an actual basis in the pay scale of Rs.9300-34800/- with
grade pay of Rs.4800/-, duly directing the respondents/petitioners
herein to pay the arrears from the date of filing of the OA, as illegal and
arbitrary and consequently set the same and pass such other order or
orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of
justice.
HYDERABAD.
Dated:19-06-2018 COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS

HYDERABAD :: DISTRICT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF

JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
W.P. No. OF 2018
MEMORANDUM OF WRIT
PETITION
Filed by
Y. KAMALA RANI ( )
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS
MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION MISC. PETITION
(Under. Section 151 of C.P.C)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE
OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
I.A.No. of 2018
In
W.P.No. of 2018
Between:


… Petitioners
AND







…Respondents
For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of writ
petition, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be
pleased to stay all further proceedings in OA No.021/01447/2014 dt.19-
02-2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad
Bench, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above WP and pass such
other order or orders as this Hon’ble court deem fit and proper in the
interest of justice.
Hyderabad
Date: 19-06-2018 COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS
HYDERABAD DISTRICT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF

JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND
I.A. No. of 2018

in
W.P.No. of 2018
DIRECTION - PETITION
Filed by
Y. KAMALA RANI( ),
BATTA







Hyderabad
Date: 19-06-2018 Counsel for the Petitioners
BATTA








Hyderabad
RESPONDENTS ADDRESSES








IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
W.P. NO. OF 2018

Between:
Union of India & others
…Petitioners
And
G. Yesumani, D/o G. Chandrappa,

Lallaguda, Secunderabad & others
…Respondents
CHECK LIST FOR WRIT PETITION
S.No. ITEM PAGE CHECKING

REMARKS
No. No. OFFICER'S VERIFICATION
1 2 3 4
5
ORIGINAL SET
1) Proof of Service 1
2) Court Fee Rs. /- 2
3) Writ Petition 3
4) Annexures I & II 4
5) Affidavit 5 to
a) Averment regarding
previous proceedings
(mention Page No.
Page No. )
b) Averment regarding
alternative relief
(mention Page No.
Page No. )
6) Verification Statement
7) Enclosure
8) Material Papers
(Duly Indexed
P.Series/R.Series.) to
9) a)Vakalath Rs. /-
b)Power of Attorney/
Resolution Authorising
to sue if petition is
filed in rep.capacity
10)Sheet containing
Respondent' Addresses
::2::
DUPLICATE SET
11) Writ Petition 3

12) Annexures I & II 4
13) Affidavit 5 to
14) Material Papers to
MISCELLANEOUS SET
15) Batta Rs.

16) Rule Nisi Forms
17) Covers with Postal
Addresses & Ack.Forms
18) Copies of Petition
and Affidavits
(As many as the No.of

the Respondent + 2)
19. WRIT PETITION MISC. PETITION

(Filed for)
Petition
Court Fee Rs.
Batta Rs.
Notice Papers, Covers

with Postal Addresses
and Ack.Forms
Proforma Draft Interim Order
SIGNATURE OF THE SIGNATURE OF THE ADVOCATE

SCRUTINY OFFICER NAME: T. Srinivasa Rao (5194),
L. Srinivas,
Advocates
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Respondent Vakalat filed by for Respt.No.
Counter Filed for Respt.No.
Other Miscellaneous Petitions filed

(Writ of Court Orders-Order List (To Produce and or to appear)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
day the of two thousand seventeen
WRIT PETITION NO OF 2018

Between:
…Petitioners
And







…Respondents
I, Y. Kamala Rani ( ), Advocate, upon motion this day made in to this Court by
bring of opinion that the record to and touching upon all the matter and contentions
raised in the memorandum of representation petition, a copy of which is annexed
hereto, together with the decision therein should be called for and pursued: IT IS
HEREBY COMMANDED.
1) That you, the aforesaid Respondent No. do sent, of our use in High Court of
Judicature of Andhra Pradesh all and singular the said record and other with all the
things touching the same as fully and perfectly as they have been made by you and
now remain in your custody or power together with this, Rule Nise before the day of
2018 and
That you intend to oppose the petition you the aforesaid Respondent No. do
appear personally OR by Advocate on the day of 2018 at 10-30 A.M.
before the court show cause why this petition should not be complied with and that we
may cause further to be done there on what of right and according to law we shall see
fit to be done.
WITNESS the Hon'ble Chief Justice of High Court of Judicature,

Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, this the year two thousand eighteen
Assistant registrar
Hearing Date
RETURN OF THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI ORDER : NISI
(To be endorsed on Writ to appear)
The Process of the Writ of Certiorari where of mention is which made

was served on Respondent This day of
one thousand nine hundred and ninety eight
This should be served urgently on the Respondent

No. and returned to the High Court
(Sd)
writ and rule nise

------------------------------
W.P. No. of 2018
Certified that the required conveyance charges and the process for the
service of the Process have been collected it is requested that English
Translation of the Process Service, Report, it is in Vernacular, my be
sent along with the Rule-Nise returned.
FORM: 8
FORM: 8
RETURN OF THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI ORDER NISI
(TO BE ENDORSED ON WRIT TO PRODUCE)
The process of the Writ of certiorari where of mention is within made

with all things touching the same in the several papers hereto annexed
as within commanded.
The Answer of
The
Respondent here
Date day of 2018

RUNNING INDEX
W.P.NO. of 2018
Sl.No. Exhibits Description of the Date of Date of Page

paper filing Nos.
document
1. Service Certificate 19-06-2018 19-6-2018 1
2. Court Fee -do- -do- 2
3. Petition -do- -do-
4. Annexure -do- -do-
5. Affidavit & verification -do- -do-
MATERIAL PAPERS
6. Ex.P.1 Copy of the orders 19-02-2018 -do-

passed in OA
No.021//01447/2014
7. Ex.P.2 Copy of the -do-
Illustration chart of
Post Nursing Sister
8. Ex.P.3 Copy of Serial Circular 24-09-2008 -do-
No.119/2008
No.P®418/III
9. -do-
10. Vakalath 19-06-2018 -do-
11. Respondents Address 19-06-2018 -do-
Hyderabad

SINGLE / BENCH
SERVICE/NON-SERVICE
DEPT:
Category Code and
Sub-Category Code
Admission Court:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND
SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION
W.P.No. of 2018
Hyderabad DISTRICT

…Petitioners
Y. Kamala Rani ( )
NATURE OF APPLICATION
(Under Art 226 of Constitution of India)
Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue
a writ, order or direction more
particularly one in the nature of Writ
of Mandamus declaring the action of
the 1st respondent in issuing the
impugned order dt.19-02-2018 in OA
No.021/01447/2014 directing the
respondents therein to fix the pay of
the applicants on a notional basis in
the upgraded pay scale of Rs.7500-
12000/- w.e.f. 01-01-2006 and
thereafter on an actual basis in the
pay scale of Rs.9300-34800/- with
grade pay of Rs.4800/-, duly directing
the respondents/petitioners herein to
pay the arrears from the date of filing
of the OA, as illegal and arbitrary and
consequently set the same and pass
such other order or orders as this
Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in
the interest of justice.
PRESENTED ON 19-06-2018
RE-PRESENTED ON 2018
FILED ON 2018
W.P.M.P.No. 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF
TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF
ANDHRA PRADESH
WRIT PETITION MISC. PETITION
I.A.No. of 2018
IN
W.P.No. of 2018
HYDERABAD DISTRICT

…Petitioners
Y. Kamala Rani( )
NATURE OF APPLICATION
(Under Section 151 of C.P.C.)
Hon’ble Court may be pleased to stay
all further proceedings in OA
No.021/01447/2014 dt.19-02-2018
passed by the Central Administrative
Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench,
Hyderabad, pending disposal of the
above WP and pass such other order
or orders as this Hon’ble court deem
fit and proper in the interest of
justice.
PRESENTED ON 19-06-2018
RE-PRESENTED ON 2018
FILED ON 2018
I.A.No. OF 2018 IN W.P. NO OF 2018
Between:

…Petitioners
And








…Respondents
Take Notice that the Appellant /Petitioner (Respondent) has/have
presented a petition to the Court Praying that Under Section 151 of
C.P.C. (AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION ENCLOSED) and that the same will
be heard by the Court on the day 2018.
Notice and Interim Stay has/have been granted by order Court
dated the of 2018 the affidavit of has
been filed in support thereof Dated at Hyderabad this day
2018.
Advocate for Petitioners

W.P. No. of 2018
CHRONOLOGICAL EVENTS
ANNEXURE – I
Sl. Date Description Page Para

No. No. Nos.
1 19-2-2018 The present writ petition is filed assailing 2
01-1-2006 the order dated 19-02-2018 of Hon’ble
Central Tribunal, Hyderabad rendered in
OA No.021/001447/2014. The Hon’ble
Tribunal directed the respondents in the
OA to fix the pay of the applicants on a
notional basis in the upgraded pay scale
of Rs.7500/--12000/- w.e.f. 01-01-2006
and thereafter on an actual basis in the
pay scale of Rs.9300/--34800/- with
grade pay of Rs.4800/-. It was also
directed that the applicants be paid
arrears the date of filing of the OA. This
shall be done within three months from
the date of receipt of a copy of the
order. I submit that the order of the
Tribunal is illegal, arbitrary and against
law laid down by the Hon’ble supreme
Court in the case of UOI Vs K.V. Rama
Raju & ors (Civil Appeal No.1350/2018)
arising out of SLP © 3315/2018.
2 01-1-2006 The contention of the applicants in the 3

OA is that fixing of the pay of applicants
was wrong, getting less pay and direct
the respondents in the OA to consider
the pay in the pre3-revised pay scale of
V Central Pay Commission (CPC) as
Rs.7500/- as minimum pay and multiply
it with 1.86 factor and there after add
Rs.4800/- grade pay for fixing the pay in
the VI CPC w.e.f. 01-01-2006.
3 Nil The South Central Railway like all the 4

Zonal Railways follow the
orders/instructions of the Ministry of
Railways (Railway Board) and all railway
employees pay scales are governed by
the Railway Servants (Revision of
Pay)000000 Rules 2008 as such there
are no provisions to compare with other
Central Government Organizations.
4 01-01-206 In terms of Rule 8 of RS(RP)00 Rules, 6
208, Section-II of Part ’A’ of the first
schedule indicates the entry level pay in
the Pay Bank at which the pay of direct
recruits to a particular post carrying a
specific grade pay will be fixed on or
after 01-1-2006.
5 Nil The Hon’ble Tribunal by following the 9

judgements rendered by the various
Tribunals allowed the OA. The Tribunal
did not adjudicate the issue
independently and allowed the OA
merely followed decisions of other
Tribunals.
6 02-3-2018 Aggrieved against the order of the 10

Hon’ble Tribunal in OA
No.021/01447/2014 in OA No.020/0077
of 2014, dt. 22-03-2018, the above writ
petition is filed.
ANNEXURE – II
1. Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Hyderabad
Dated: 19-06-2018 Counsel for the petitioners
W.P. NO OF 2018
Between:

…Petitioners
And
G. Yesumani, D/o G. Chandrappa,
Lallaguda, Secunderabad & others
…Respondents
COURT FEE
HYDERABAD.
Dated 19-06-2018 COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS

HIGH COURT OF JUDICIATE AT HYDERABAD
Basic information to be furnished in the Writ/Civil/Criminal Cases for NC 1.0
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

No. Year
Filing No.
(Unregistered)
Main No.
(Registered)
I.
Name of the First Union of India Age:
Petitioner
Name of the First G. Yesumani, Age: 53
Respondent
District Name: Hyderabad Computer Code 5194
Name of the Y. Kamala Rani Bar Council AP/1247/1999
Counsel Enrollment No.
II. Fee paid by: Challan/ Stamps Challan Date: 19-06-2018
Court Fee Rs.

Carbon Copy Rs.
Vakalat Rs.
Batta in Main Case (Process Rs.
fees)
IA (MPs) Rs.
Court Fee
Batta in IA (MPs) Rs.
(Process Fees)
IA (MPs) Rs.
Court Fee
Batta in IA (MPs) (Process Rs.
Fees)
IA (MPs) Rs.
Court Fee
Batta in IA (MPs) Rs.
(Process Fees)
Total Rs.
III. Lower Court Details: (For Civil and Criminal Cases Only)
Case Type Case no. Case Year Order Date Name of the Lower
Court/any other
IV. Enclosures:
Full Cause Title in Separate Sheet:

Main case prayer in Separate Sheet:
IA(s) Prayer in Separate Sheet:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HTYDERABAD
[For the state of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh]
WP.NO. OF 2018
BETWEEN:-



… Petitioners
AND







…Respondents
Main Prayer:
Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more
particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action
of the 1st respondent in issuing the impugned order dt.19-02-2018 in
OA No.021/01447/2014 directing the respondents therein to fix the pay
of the applicants on a notional basis in the upgraded pay scale of
Rs.7500-12000/- w.e.f. 01-01-2006 and thereafter on an actual basis in
the pay scale of Rs.9300-34800/- with grade pay of Rs.4800/-, duly
directing the respondents/petitioners herein to pay the arrears from the
date of filing of the OA, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently set the
same and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems
fit and proper in the interest of justice.

Interim Prayer:
Hon’ble Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OA
No.021/01447/2014 dt.19-02-2018 passed by the Central
Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad, pending disposal
of the above WP and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble
court deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

Writ - Railways Department - 30-05-2018 - Care of Y. Kamala Rani

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Writ - Railways Department - 30-05-2018 - Care of Y. Kamala Rani

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Writ - Railways Department - 30-05-2018 - Care of Y. Kamala Rani

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HTYDERABAD

For the state of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh

1. Union of India, Rep. by the Chairman,

2. The General Manager,

3. The Principal Chief Personnel Officer,

1. G. Yesumani, D/o G. Chandrappa,

2. K. Padmalatha, W/o K. Bala Bhaskar,

3. B.R. Swarnalatha, W/o D. Vikram Kumar,

4. Georgina Francis, W/o T.G. Francis,

5. P. Shantilatha, D/o Adinarayana Patnaik,

7. B. Saimala, W/o B. Venkata Ramana,

8. A. Mary Kalyani, D/o Late A.L. Marianna,

I, _____________ , S/o ______________, Aged about ___

1. I am the Chief Personnel Officer of the South Central Railways

2. I submit that the present writ petition is filed challenging the

3. It is submitted that the contention of the respondents 3 to 10 that

Category Pay Band Pay Corresponding Pay Grade

4. It is submitted that the respondents quoted RBE No.103/2008.

5. It is submitted that as per S.C.No.108/2008, initial entry grade of

Category Pay Band Grade Pay

6. It is submitted that as per S.C.No.34/2010(1/4) stepping up of

“The extent rules of stepping up of pay in terms of Para

to approach this Hon’ble Court under article 226 of the Constitution of

seeking the same relief now sought in this writ petition.

It is further prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to stay

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed

I, R. Guruswamy, S/o Subbaiah, Aged about 57 years, Chief

Personnel Officer/HRD, South Central Railways, Rail Nilayam,

Secunderabad, being the petitioner, acquainted with the facts do hereby

filed in support of the writ petition are true to my personal knowledge

remaining paras are based on legal advice believed to be correct.

Verified at Hyderabad on this ___ day of June, 2018 at

Counsel for the Petitioner DEPONENT

1. Union of India, Rep. by the Chairman,

2. The General Manager,

3. The Principal Chief Personnel Officer,

1. G. Yesumani, D/o G. Chandrappa,

2. K. Padmalatha, W/o K. Bala Bhaskar,

3. B.R. Swarnalatha, W/o D. Vikram Kumar,

4. Georgina Francis, W/o T.G. Francis,

5. P. Shantilatha, D/o Adinarayana Patnaik,

7. B. Saimala, W/o B. Venkata Ramana,

8. A. Mary Kalyani, D/o Late A.L. Marianna,

The address of the above named petitioner for the purpose of

For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the

Dated:19-06-2018 COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF

W.P. No. OF 2018

2. The General Manager,

3. The Principal Chief Personnel Officer,

1. G. Yesumani, D/o G. Chandrappa,

2. K. Padmalatha, W/o K. Bala Bhaskar,

3. B.R. Swarnalatha, W/o D. Vikram Kumar,

4. Georgina Francis, W/o T.G. Francis,

5. P. Shantilatha, D/o Adinarayana Patnaik,

7. B. Saimala, W/o B. Venkata Ramana,

8. A. Mary Kalyani, D/o Late A.L. Marianna,

For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of writ

pleased to stay all further proceedings in OA No.021/01447/2014 dt.19-

I, _ , S/o , Aged about _