Designand Calculationofthe Pressure Relief Valvesand Rupture Disks System
Designand Calculationofthe Pressure Relief Valvesand Rupture Disks System
Designand Calculationofthe Pressure Relief Valvesand Rupture Disks System
net/publication/311949634
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
CITATIONS READS
0 15,662
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Identify Assess, Select, Define and Execute - GHG and Energy Management View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Prakash Bahadur Thapa on 28 December 2016.
Abstract
Oil and gas production facilities handle gas and liquids under pressure conditions where the
improper use or failure of certain components may cause an overpressure of various facility
components. Economic considerations do not allow the facility engineer to design all components to
withstand the maximum pressure to which they may be exposed. To provide a safe yet economic
design, pressure relieving devices are used.
This tutorial deals with the design, selection, operation, and maintenance of pressure relief devices
for the protection of pipe, valves, fittings, vessels, and other components. Pressure safety valves and
rupture disks are discussed, along with a variety of installation methods and testing techniques.
Downstream gas disposal methods are discussed in the tutorial EPT 04-T-02 on Flare and Vent
Systems. Most definitions required for an understanding of pressure relieving devices can be found
in Part 1 of API RP 520 I.
Introduction
There are five primary codes which address the use of pressure relieving components. The pressure
vessel code, whether American, Canadian, or British, requires the presence of a relief device on all
code approved vessels. The American Petroleum Institute (API) provides API RP 520 I, “Sizing,
Selection, and Installation of Pressure Relieving Devices in Refineries”. This RP is often applied to
production facilities and provides a guide for sizing and analysis of safety relief devices. API RP
14C, “Analysis, Design, Installation and Testing of Basic Surface Safety Systems for Offshore
Production Platforms”, recommends the installation of relief valves for various components within a
production system. API RP 14E, “Design and Installation of Offshore Production Platform Piping
Systems”, discusses the use, in conjunction with API RP 14C, of pressure relieving devices to
protect piping systems. Finally API RP 521, “Guide for Pressure-Relieving and Depressuring
Systems”, discusses design of the overall relieving system. Piping systems are covered in the
tutorial EPT 09-T-01 on Facilities Piping, while relieving systems are covered in the tutorial EPT
04-T-02 on Flare and Vent Systems.
All of the following devices relieve pressure automatically, actuated by upstream static pressure.
1 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Relief Valves
Relief valves are spring loaded pressure relief devices. At the set pressure, the inlet pressure force
overcomes the spring force and the valve disk begins to lift off the seat. As inlet pressure increases,
the lift of the disk increases proportionally to allow an increase in the flow. The closing pressure is
less than the set pressure and shall be reached after the blowdown phase is complete.
These devices are used primarily for liquid service (incompressible fluids) and open in proportion to
increasing pressure over opening pressure. Relief capacities are usually rated at 10 or 25 percent
overpressure, depending on the application.
Safety Valves
Safety valves are also spring loaded pressure relief devices, but they are designed to provide full
opening with minimum overpressure. Static pressure and the kinetic energy of the gas or vapor are
utilized to overcome the spring force on the disk as it lifts, resulting in a popping action. These
devices are used primarily for steam and air services (compressible fluids) and provide rapid full
opening or pop action with little overpressure.
Safety relief valves provide the characteristics of safety valves in gas or vapor service and the
characteristics of relief valves in liquid service.
They may be pilot operated - controlled by an auxiliary (pilot) valve - or spring loaded. Spring
loaded safety relief valves are of either of two types, conventional (performance depends on back-
pressure) or balanced (minimizes the effect of back-pressure).
Rupture Disks
Rupture disks are non-reclosing differential pressure relief devices. A “rupture disk device” is
defined as both the rupture disk itself and the rupture disk holder.
Valves that activate automatically to relieve pressure are called “safety valves”, “relief valves”, or
“safety relief valves”. Safety valves are spring loaded and characterized by a rapid full opening or
“pop” action. They are used primarily for steam or air service. Sometimes they are referred to as
“pop valves”. Relief valves are spring loaded and open more slowly. They reach full opening at 10
or 25 percent above set pressure and are used primarily for liquid services. Safety relief valves can
be either spring loaded or pilot operated. Most automatically actuating relief devices used in
production facilities are actually safety relief valves; however, they are commonly referred to as
relief valves or safety valves. In this tutorial the term “relief valve” is used in the generic sense of
any automatically actuating pressure relieving device with reclosing capabilities. There are three
types of relief valves: conventional (spring loaded), balanced bellows, and pilot operated.
2 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Conventional
Figure 1 shows a cross section of a conventional relief valve, while Figure 2 is a schematic that
shows the valve's operation. A vented bonnet configuration is one that consists of a spring which
creates a closing force that overcomes both the pressure in the vessel, P1, and the back-pressure
downstream of the valve, P2. At the set point, the force of P1 and P2 acting on their respective areas
equals the spring force, and the valve opens. If the valve is installed in a header system with other
valves, then the set point required to overcome the spring force decreases if P 2 is increased.
3 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Figure 2: Schematic Showing Operation of Conventional Relief Valves (Courtesy of API, API
RP 520 I)
In a non-vented bonnet type conventional relief valve, the back-pressure acts downward on the entire
disk area but also acts upward on a portion of the disk area. In this case, an increasing back-pressure
shall cause an increase in the valve set point.
Where the discharge is routed independently to atmosphere, conventional relief valves shall be used.
If this type of device is installed in a header system, when one device is relieving, thereby creating a
header back-pressure, the set point of every other device in the header system shall be affected.
Conventional relief valves are normally used in an open system or in a closed flare header system
designed so that the back-pressure does not exceed 10 percent of the relief valve set pressure.
Conventional relief valves may be equipped with lifting levers or screwed caps. The lifting lever
permits mechanical operation of the valve for testing or cleaning out foreign material from under the
seat. Screwed caps prevent leakage from the valve, but they also prevent overriding the spring if
foreign material or ice becomes lodged under the disk. Relief valves for steam and air service are
required by code to be furnished with lifting levers.
Balanced Bellows
Balanced bellows relief valves are a variation of spring-loaded valves. They contain a bellows
arrangement to prevent back-pressure from affecting the set point. Figure 3 shows a cross section of
a balanced relief valve, and Figure 4 is a schematic that shows how the valve operates. The bonnet
is vented to atmosphere, providing a constant force downward on the disk. The bellows is installed
in such a manner that the back-pressure acts both downward and upward on equal areas of the disk.
4 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
This means that the forces created by the back- pressure cancel and therefore do not affect the set
point.
5 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Figure 4: Schematic Showing Operation of a Balanced Bellows Relief Valve (Courtesy of API,
from API RP 520 I)
Balanced bellows valves are normally used where the relief valves are piped to a closed flare system
and the back-pressure exceeds 10 percent of the set pressure. They cost more than conventional
relief valves. In sour service, the bonnet vent shall be piped to a safe location.
Pilot-Operated
There is no spring in a pilot operated relief valve the Instead a pilot valve, shown in Figure 5, senses
vessel pressure. Under normal conditions, vessel pressure is routed through the pilot to the upper
side of the disk. The area exposed to this pressure is larger than the disk area exposed to the inlet
nozzle. Therefore the seating force on the disk is greater than the lifting force. In fact, as the vessel
pressure approaches the set point, the closing force increases to assure a tight seal and to prevent
valve “chatter”. When the set point is reached, the pilot shifts, blocking the pressure from the vessel,
venting pressure from above the disk, and allowing the disk to rise.
6 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
7 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
One disadvantage of pilot operated valves is that, if there is no pressure in the vessel, back-pressure
on the valve could cause the disk to lift. If a vessel was shut-in and depressured for maintenance,
and the relief valve outlet was tied into a relief header, when another valve in the header was opened,
back-pressure would be applied to the disk. Figure 6 shows an arrangement of two check valves in
the sensing system to assure that either vessel pressure or header pressure, whichever is greater, is
always present above the disk. Such an arrangement provides “backflow protection”. Additionally,
pilot operated valves shall not function if the pilot fails. If the sensing line fills with hydrates or
solids, the valve shall not open until the vessel pressure is 25 percent greater than the pressure
trapped above the disk (usually the normal operating pressure of the vessel). For this reason pilot
operated valves shall be used with care in dirty gas service and liquid service.
Rupture Disks
Rupture disks are thin diaphragms held between flanges and designed to burst at a specific static
inlet pressure. A conventional rupture disk is shown in Figure 7. These devices cannot reseal when
the pressure declines. If the disk ruptures and flow continues into the vessel, the relief system shall
be designed for the anticipated flow rate. The disk shall be replaced before the pressure vessel can
be placed back in service. Figure 8 shows the relationship between vessel Maximum Allowable
Working Pressure (MAWP), and single and multiple rupture disk applications.
8 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
9 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Figure 8: Pressure Level Relationships for Rupture Disk Devices (Courtesy of API, from API
RP 520 I)
Rupture disks can be manufactured from a variety of materials and with coatings for corrosion
resistance. The most common disk materials are aluminum, monel, inconel, stainless steel, and
plastic.
10 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Rupture disks may be used alone, or as a backup in parallel with a relief valve. If used as a backup,
the disk may be set to relieve at approximately 115 percent MAWP (See Figure 7). This ensures that
the disk ruptures only if the relief valve fails or is inadequately sized so that when the pressure rises
above 110 percent MAWP, the relief valve does not have enough capacity.
A rupture disk can also be used in series with a relief valve. Located at the valve inlet to protect the
valve from corrosion conditions within the vessel, a rupture disk allows the use of a less expensive
valve. Valve internals are protected from the corrosive materials, so specialized metallurgy is not
required. Fugitive emissions that pass through pressure relief valves are also eliminated. When
properly designed, the rupture disk bursts first, with the relief valve immediately opening. When the
pressure declines, the relief valve reseals, limiting additional flow.
Additional instrumentation shall be provided so the operator will be advised to replace the ruptured
disk. This is also true if the rupture disk develops a small pinhole leak, because the pressure on the
back of the disk can build up. Since the rupture disk is designed to fail at a specified differential
pressure across the disk, any back-pressure shall cause it to fail at a system pressure higher than the
intended relieving pressure. ASME Code requires a free vent, a try-cock, a pressure gauge, or
suitable telltale indicator to relieve or sense back-pressure buildup. These shall be monitored so the
rupture disk can be replaced if failure occurs.
In this application, the relief valve capacity shall be derated by 20 percent unless the manufacturer
has established a certified capacity factor for the specific rupture disk/valve combination per ASME
SEC VIII D1. The rupture disks shall be non-fragmenting so that pieces of the rupture disk do not
block the valve or prevent it from opening. Figure 9 shows a scored, tension-loaded rupture disk,
which is normally non-fragmenting.
11 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Figure 9: Scored Tension–Loaded Rupture Disk (Courtesy of API, from API RP 520 I)
General
For safe production facility design, all of the following conditions shall be considered to determine
which one governs the size of the relief valve:
12 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
1. Blocked discharge. If all outlets from the vessel are assumed to be shut- in, the total
design inlet mass flow rate shall be handled by the relief valve. This condition could
occur if, after the equipment has been shut- in and isolated, the operator opens the inlet
prior to opening the outlet valving.
2. Fire. An external fire can result in vapors evolving from the liquids and in thermal
expansion of the gas, which the relief valve shall be able to accommodate. A procedure
for calculating this is presented in API RP 520 I. This condition may be critical for large,
low-pressure vessels and tanks, but it does not normally govern for most other pressure
vessels.
3. Gas blowby. Gas blowby is a critical condition in production facility design. This
condition occurs when an upstream liquid control valve fails in the open condition or an
upstream manual drain valve is inadvertently left in the open position. The relief valve
shall then handle the maximum gas flow rate into the downstream component during this
upset condition. For example, if a high-pressure separator were to experience gas
blowby, the downstream lower-pressure separator relief valve may have to handle the
total design gas flow rate of the high-pressure separator. While this flow may be
restricted by an orifice or piping pressure drop, this would not be a conservative
assumption. Accidents involving overpressuring of low pressure separators are often a
result of relief valves being inadequately sized to handle the gas blowby condition.
4. Thermal Relief. Equipment that is completely full of liquid presents a problem of liquid
hydraulic expansion if it is blocked in while heat is added. In many cases, this potential
risk can be controlled by design or procedures (see API RP 521). To protect piping or
equipment against overpressure resulting from ambient temperature changes, a nominal-
size relief device (for example, a 19 by 25 mm, or 3/4 by 1 in, relief valve) will normally
suffice.
Figure 10 shows the relationships between vessel Maximum Allowable Working Pressure (MAWP)
and the safety relief valve set pressure for single and multiple relief valve installations. For a single
relief valve installation, the primary relief valve shall be set to open at no more than 100 percent of
the MAWP and sized to relieve the worst case flow rate, either blocked discharge or gas blowby
(exclusive of fire), at a pressure of 1.10 MAWP. If two or more relief valves are used to handle the
worst case flow rates, the first valve still shall be set no higher than 100 percent MAWP, while the
second or last may be set for 1.05 MAWP. Their combined capacity shall relieve the same worst
case flow rates at 1.16 MAWP.
13 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Figure 10: Pressure Level Relationships for Pressure Relief Valve (Courtesy of API, from API
RP 520 I)
The maximum pressure for fire relief rates 1.21 MAWP. Under these relief conditions, the pressure
in the vessel shall actually exceed the MAWP. Such occurrences are taken into account by the
various safety factors in the ASME Pressure Vessel Code. This situation is one reason the vessel is
tested to 1.5 MAWP prior to receiving the code stamp.
The relief valve shall be installed so that discharged gases and/or liquids are routed to a safe
location. In small facilities and remote locations where no liquids are discharged, this may be
accomplished with a simple “tail pipe”, which points the discharge vertically upward. A jet in
excess of 150 m/sec (500 ft/sec) dilutes the discharge gases to below the lower flammable limit in
approximately 120 pipe diameters.
Large facilities and offshore platforms where the escaping gases and liquids could present a source
of pollution or ignition often route the relief valve discharges into a common header that discharges
at a safe location. A vent scrubber is installed in this header to separate the bulk of the liquids and to
minimize the possibility of liquid discharges to the surroundings. For relief systems with a common
header, the back- pressure developed in the header shall be checked for various relieving scenarios.
When reliefs discharge into a common header, the header pressure shall increase. As discussed
previously, this back-pressure can adversely affect relief valve performance by causing the valve to
open at a higher pressure, or it may restrict the flow capacity. The effect depends on the type of
relief valve and the severity of the back-pressure. The design of headers, scrubbers, and vent or flare
systems is beyond the scope of this tutorial and is covered in API RP 521. Specific header sizing
information is included in the tutorial EPT 04-T-02 on Flare and Vent Systems.
14 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
General
1. The maximum flow of a compressible fluid through an orifice occurs at sonic velocity. Sonic
velocity is maintained as long as the pressure drop through the orifice is sufficiently high.
2. Critical Pressure Ratio (c) is the largest ratio of downstream pressure to upstream pressure
capable of producing sonic velocity. It is dependent on the specific heat ratio of the fluid:
Equation 1
k
Pcf 2 k -1
c
P1 k 1
where :
c critical pressure ratio
k specific heat ratio, C p / Cv
Pcf critical flow outlet pressure, kPa psia
P1 inlet pressure, kPa psia
3. Values of k and molecular weights for common gases are shown in Table 1. Critical
Flow Pressure is slightly greater than half of the inlet pressure for gases with specific heat
ratios < 1.5.
15 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
16 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
back-pressure is greater than the critical flow pressure, the gas rate is then also a function of
outlet pressure (subcritical flow).
The value of k can be accurately calculated as described in the tutorials EPT 07-T-03A and
EPT 07-T-03B on Reciprocating Compressors, provided the gas composition is known.
When this is not the case, k can be estimated from Figure 11, based on:
Equation 2
CP 5.1 5.1
k ~ 1 1
CV 29 SG MW
where :
SG gas specific gravity relative to air
MW gas molecular weight
C P specific heat at constant pressure
CV specific heat at constant volume
17 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Figure 11: Specific Heats Ratio Versus Molecular Weight for Hydrocarbon Gases (Courtesy
of API, from API RP 520 I)
6. The sizing equations for pressure relief valves in vapor service fall into two general
categories, critical or subcritical.
7. If the pressure downstream of the throat is less than or equal to the critical flow pressure,
Pcf, then critical flow shall occur, and the procedures in Section 7.2.2 shall be applied.
8. If the downstream pressure exceeds the critical flow pressure, Pcf, then subcritical flow
shall occur, and the procedures in Section 7.2.3 shall be applied.
18 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Equation 3
Metric :
13,157W TZ
a
CK d P1 K b MW
Customary :
W TZ
a
C K d P1 K b MW
Equation 4
Metric :
555.79V TZMW
a
CK d P1 K b
Customary :
V T Z MW
a
6.32 C K d P1 K b
Equation 5
Metric :
2993V TZSG
a
CK d P1 K b
Customary :
V T Z SG
a
1.175 C K d P1 K b
19 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
where :
a required effective discharge area of valve, mm2 in 2
W required flow through the valve, kg / hr lb / hr
C coefficien t determined from the ratio of the specific heats of
the gas or vapor at standard conditions . This can be obtained
from Figure 12 or Table 2.
K d valve coefficien t of discharge from valve manufactur er . For
Farris and Consolidat ed spring operated, K d 0.975. For AGCO
type 23 and 33 pilot operated, K d 0.92.
P1 upstream relieving pressure, kPa psia . This is the set
pressure plus the allowable overpressure plus atmosperic pressure.
Pset Pov 100 kPa Pset Pav 14.7 psi
Pset set pressure, kPa psig
Pov overpressure, kPa psig
percent overpressure
Pset
100
20 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Figure 12: Coefficient C Versus Specific Heats Ratio (Courtesy of API, from API RP 520 I)
21 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
k C k C k C
1.01 316.56 1.31 347.91 1.61 373.32
1.02 317.74 1.32 348.84 1.62 374.09
1.03 318.90 1.33 349.77 1.63 374.85
1.04 320.05 1.34 350.68 1.64 375.61
1.05 321.19 1.35 351.60 1.65 376.37
22 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Figure 13: Variable or Constant Back-Pressure Sizing Factor, Kb, for Balanced Bellows Safety
Relief Valves (Vapors and Gases) (Courtesy of API, from API RP 520 I)
2. A standard orifice size may be selected from Table 3.
Table 3: Standard Orifice Areas and Designations
(From API Standard 526)
Orifice Area (Square in)
D 0.110
E 0.196
23 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
F 0.307
G 0.503
H 0.785
J 1.287
K 1.838
L 2.853
M 3.60
N 4.43
P 6.38
Q 11.05
R 16.0
T 26.0
3. Alternately, Equations (3), (4), and (5) may be rearranged to solve for flow rates for a given
area:
Equation 6
Metric :
aCK d P1 K b MW
W
13,157 TZ
Customary :
MW
W a C K d P1 K b
TZ
Equation 7
Metric :
aCK d P1 K b
V
555.79 TZMW
Customary :
6.32 a C K d P1 K b
V
T Z MW
24 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Equation 8
Metric :
aCK d P1 K b
V
2993 TZSG
Customary :
1.175 a C K d P1 K b
V
T Z SG
Customary :
W ZT
a
735 F2 K d MW P1 P1 - P2
Equation 10
Metric :
0.756V ZTMW
a
F2 K d P1 P1 - P2
Customary :
V ZT MW
a
4645.2 F2 K d P1 P1 - P2
25 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Equation 11
Metric :
4.07V ZT SG
a
F2 K d P1 P1 - P2
Customary :
V ZT SG
a
863.63 F2 K d P1 P1 - P2
where :
F2 coefficien t of subcritic al flow see Figure 14 for values
k -1
2
k k 1 - r k
r
k -1 1- r
r ratio of back - pressure to upstream relieving pressure, P2 / P1
P2 back - pressure, kPa psia
Pb 100 kPa Pb 14.7 psia
Pb back - pressure, kPa psig
26 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Figure 14: Values of Subcritical Flow Coefficient F2 (Courtesy of API, from API RP 520 I)
1. Equations (9), (10), and (11) may be solved for flow rates for a
given area:
Equation 12
Metric :
aF2 K d MWP1 P1 - P2
W
17.90 ZT
Customary :
MW P1 P1 - P2
W 735 a F2 K d
ZT
Equation 13
27 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Metric :
aF2 K d P1 P1 - P2
V
0.756 ZT MW
Customary :
P1 P1 - P2
V 4645.2 a F2 K d
Z T MW
Equation 14
Metric :
aF2 K d P1 P1 - P2
V
4.07 ZT SG
Customary :
P1 P1 - P2
V 863.63 a F2 K d
Z T SG
Steam Service
Equation 15
Metric :
190.42W
a
P1 K d K N K SH
Customary :
W
a
51.5 P1 K d K N K SH
28 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
where :
K d valve coefficien t of discharge from valve manufactur er . For
Farris and Consolidat ed spring operated, K d 0.975. For AGCO
type 23 and 33 pilot operated, K d 0.92.
K N correction factor for Napier equation
1 where P1 10,446 kPa 1515 psia
0.0280 P1 - 1000
where 10,446 kPa P1 22,167 kPa
0.0337 P1 - 1061
0.1906 P1 - 1000
where 1515 psia P1 3215 psia
0.2292 P1 - 1061
K SH superheat steam correction factor. This can be obtained from API
RP 520, Table 10, Superheat Correction Factors, K SH . For
saturated steam at any pressure, K SH 1.0.
Alternately, the mass flow rate may be calculated from the valve discharge area:
Equation 16
Metric :
aP1 K d K N K SH
W
190.42
Customary :
W 51.5 a P1 K d K N K SH
Liquid Service
The procedure for obtaining capacity certification per ASME SEC VIII D1 includes determination of
the coefficient of discharge for the design of liquid relief valves at 10 percent overpressure. Valves
that require a capacity in accordance with the ASME Code are sized using:
29 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Equation 17
Metric :
196.3Q SGL
a
K d KW KV P1 - P2
Customary :
Q SGL
a
38 K d KW KV P1 - P2
where :
Q flow rate at flowing temperatur e, m 3 / hr gpm
K d effective coefficien t of discharge that should be obtained from
the valve manufactur er. For a preliminar y sizing estimation a
discharge coefficien t of 0.65 can be used.
KW correction factor due to back - pressure. If the back - pressure is
atmospheric, KW 1. Balanced - bellows valves in back - pressure
service will require the correction factor determined from Figure
15. Conventional valves require no special correction .
KV correction factor due to vicosity as determined from Figure 16.
SGL specific gravity of liquid at flowing temperatur e, relative
to water
30 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Figure 15: Correction Factor Due to Back-Pressure on Balanced Bellows Pressure Relief
Valves in Liquid Service (Courtesy of API, from API RP 520 I)
For viscous liquid service, a relief valve shall first be sized as if it were for nonviscous service to
obtain a preliminary required discharge area, a. The next larger standard orifice size shall then be
used in determining the Reynolds number, R, from either of the following relationships:
31 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Equation 18
Metric :
313.13QSGL
R
a
Customary :
Q 2800 SGL
R
a
Equation 19
Metric :
1,420,000Q
R
U a
Customary :
12700 Q
R for U 100 SUS
U a
where :
R Reynolds number
absolute viscosity at theflowing temperatur e, Pa s cp
from manufactur er' s
a effective discharge area, mm2 in 2
standard orifice areas
Saybolt
U viscosity at the flowing temperatur e, mm2 / s
Universal sec
After the value of R is determined, the factor Kv is obtained from Figure 16. K v is used to find the
required discharge area. If the corrected area exceeds the chosen standard orifice area, the
calculation shall be repeated using the next larger standard orifice size.
32 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Figure 16: Capacity Correction Factor Due to Viscosity (Courtesy of API, from API RP 520 I)
Two-Phase Flow
In production operations many relief valves shall be sized for handling fluids containing both liquid
and gas. In addition, most liquid reliefs will produce flashing and vapor generation as the fluid
moves through the valve. The vapor generation shall be considered since it may reduce the effective
mass flow capacity of the valve.
There are presently no precise formulas for calculating orifice area for two- phase flow. The
common convention is to calculate the area required for the gas and liquid flows separately as single
phase flows. The two areas are then added to approximate the area required for two-phase flow.
When liquids that are at their vapor pressure are to be relieved, the designer shall calculate the
backpressure downstream of the relief valve due to two-phase flow in the relief header. The flow
rate of vapor generated due to pressure drop through the relief valve can then be determined and the
relief valve sized for two phase flow. This is an iterative solution, as the amount of vapors generated
by pressure drop through the relief valve depends upon the backpressure, which is a function of two-
phase pressure drop in the header.
The designer shall also consider the effect of any auto refrigeration that may be caused by the
flashing of liquid. Materials of construction shall be adequate for the outlet temperatures involved.
33 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
In addition, the possibility of flow blockage occurring from hydrates or other blockages shall be
considered in the installation design when auto refrigeration conditions exist.
Reduced relief valve capacity occurs when back-pressure exceeds the following approximate
percentage of set pressure plus allowable overpressure:
1. Spring loaded 60 percent
2. Balanced bellows 35 percent
3. Pilot operated 60 percent
In relief valves other than balanced bellows relief valves, liquid flow capacity is proportional to
pressure drop across the valve. Bellows valves have a further reduction in capacity with back-
pressure. Where high back-pressure exist, therefore, this type of relief valve has a potential
disadvantage when compared to the other two types.
Installation
Relief valve inlet piping shall be as short as practical, and each relief valve shall be equipped with
inlet piping no smaller than the valve inlet flange size. The inlet piping pressure drop from the
source to the relief valve inlet flange shall not exceed 3 percent of the valve set pressure.
Where relief valves are vented to the atmosphere, they shall have “tail pipes” equal to or larger in
diameter than the relief valve outlet. These pipes shall extend vertically a minimum of 0.3 m (1 ft)
above building eaves or, in operating areas with adjacent platforms, 2.4 m (8 ft) above the platform
level. The tail pipe shall be provided with a small drain hole to keep rainwater or condensed liquids
from accumulating in the tailpipe. The drain hole shall be located such that the exhaust through the
drain hole does not impinge on vessels, piping, other equipment, or personnel.
Piping shall be installed in such a manner that liquid in the relief valve piping shall drain into the
relief header. This liquid is removed in the vent scrubber (see tutorial the EPT 04-T-02 on Flare and
Vent Systems for information on header design.) Unavoidable low spots in the piping shall be
equipped with drain valves piped to a safe location.
Relief valves shall be tested on a periodic basis even if testing is not required by regulations. Pilot
operated valves can be tested by sending a test signal to the pilot through a test connection in the
pilot sensing line. Spring loaded relief valves shall either: (1) be removed from service; (2) be
tested by subjecting the equipment being protected to set pressure; or (3) have an upstream block
valve provided, which can isolate the relief valve from the equipment being protected, and a test
connection between the block and relief valves installed. There is no industry consensus on which
of these three test methods provides the highest level of safety. Therefore, some relief valves are
installed with upstream block valves and some without.
If relief valves discharge to a common header, it is sometimes convenient to install downstream
block valves so that the relief valve can be removed for repairs without shutdown of all equipment
tied into the common header. The increase in operating flexibility may not be worth the decrease in
safety if the downstream block valve is inadvertently left closed.
34 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Where either upstream or downstream block valves are used they shall be full open gate or ball
valves with a device that enables them to be locked open and sealed. These are referred to as “car-
seal-open” valves.
Various arrangements employing three-way valves and multiple relief valves are sometimes used to
provide the benefits of being able to isolate the relief valve for testing and maintenance without the
disadvantage of decreasing safety through inadvertent closing of a block valve. Three-way valve
arrangements are much more costly than ordinary block valves. Table 1 in MP 70-P-06 provides
guidance for Mobil installations.
As much as possible, relief valves shall be accessible from platforms. Where relief valves must be
removed for testing, those with 100 mm (4 in) and larger inlet sizes often have davits or other lift
equipment nearby for lowering them to the ground. Relief valve connections to equipment and all
relief piping shall be designed to withstand the high impact forces that occur when the valve opens.
Discharge piping supports shall be arranged to minimize moments at the connection to the
equipment being protected.
35 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
36 of 53
Appendix A–Nomenclature
Operating Pressure The operating pressure is that pressure normally exerted on the
component or system. Because fluctuations in process pressure can
occur as the control system reacts to changes in flow rate,
temperature, etc., the design pressure shall always be higher than
the operating pressure.
Huddling Chamber The huddling chamber results from the shape of the seat disk and
the outlet of the relief valve inlet nozzle. Because the disk is larger
than the nozzle outlet with sides that come down around the nozzle
throat, an annular area is created, forming the huddling chamber.
When the seat lifts, higher pressure from the nozzle escapes into
the huddling chamber. Although the nozzle area pressure may be
somewhat reduced, the seat is forced open because higher pressure
is applied to the additional area of the disk in the huddling
chamber. This action increases the reliability of the relief valve
opening.
Gag When the relief valve body is pressure tested, it is necessary to
prevent the seat disk from lifting off the seat. This is accomplished
by use of a threaded rod or “gag” which is inserted into the top of
the bonnet and depresses the seat disk so that the valve remains
closed against the test pressure.
Flutter The condition when the set pressure/relieving characteristics of a
relief valve cause the seat disk to reciprocate rapidly without
contacting the valve seat is called flutter.
Chatter The condition when the set pressure/relieving characteristics of a
relief valve cause the seat disk to repeatedly lift and reseat, thereby
damaging the seat and associated piping, is called chatter.
a = effective discharge area of valve, mm2, in2
C = coefficient determined from the ratio of specific heats
CP = specific heat at constant pressure
CV = specific heat at constant volume
F2 = coefficient of subcritical flow
k = specific heat ratio, Cp/Cv
Kb = back-pressure correction factor
Kd = valve coefficient of discharge
KN = correction factor for Napier equation
Kp = correction factor for overpressure
37 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
38 of 53
Appendix B–Example Problems - Metric Units
2. Two-Phase Flow
Given:
3. Two-Phase Flow
39 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
k
2 k -1
Pcf
c
P1 k 1
1.245
1.245-1
Pcf 8270 827 101.3
2
1.245 1
5113 kPa
Pcf is greater than the back-pressure of 3450 kPa, so flow through relief valve is critical.
555.79 V T Z MW
a
C K d P1 K b
where :
K b Back - pressure correction factor
1
P1 8270 827 101.3 9198.3 kPa
C Gas constant based on ratio of specific heats C p / CV
341.22 342.19
341.71, from Table 2
2
40 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
where :
P1 - P2 8270 827 - 3450 5647 kPa
8.0 mm 2 0.012 in 2
aTOTAL aL aG
693.7 8.0
701.7mm2 1.088in 2 : Use valve size ' J'
555.79 V T Z MW
a
C K d P1 K b
Determine Kb
Back - Pressure, kPa G
Percent Gauge Back - Pressure 100
Set Pressure, kPaG
3450 100
41.7 percent
8270
816.2 mm3 1.265 in 2
41 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
196.3 Q SGL
a
K d KW KV P1 - P2
where :
KW Correction factor for back - pressure
0.77 for 41.6 percent gauge back - pressure from
Figure 15
10.4 mm2 0.016 in 2
aTOTAL aL aG
816.2 10.4
826.6mm2 1.281in 2 : Use valve size ' K'
555.79 V T Z MW
a
C K d P1 K b
735.2 mm2 1.140 in 2
42 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
196.3 Q SGL
a
K d KW KV P1 - P2
8.0 mm2 0.012 in 2
Given:
43 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
1.245
1.245-1
Pcf 690 69 101.3
2
1.245 1
478 kPa
Pcf is greater than the back-pressure of 517 kPa, so flow through relief valve is subcritical.
Permitted build-up back-pressure of 10 percent of Pset is 69 kPa, so total back- pressure = 410
+ 69 = 479 kPa (G).
0.756 V ZT MW
a
F2 K d P1 P1 - P2
From Figure 14, for r = P 2/P1 = (410 + 69 + 101.3)/(690 + 69 + 101.3) = 0.67, coefficient of
subcritical flow F2 = 0.79.
0.756 30,000 0.75 273 2123.2
a
0.79 0.975 860.3860.3 - 580.3
4291.0 mm2 6.651 in 2 : Use valve size ' Q'
555.79 V T Z MW
a
C K d P1 K b
Assume Kb = 0.65 for this application. This value would normally be obtained from the
manufacturer.
44 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
6401.1 mm2 9.922 in 2 : Use valve size ' Q'
0.756 V ZT MW
a
F2 K d P1 P1 - P2
4547.5 mm2 7.049 in 2 : Use valve size ' Q'
Two-Phase Flow
Given:
45 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
1.245
1.245-1
Pcf 1200 120 14.7
2
1.245 1
742 psia
Pcf is greater than the back-pressure of 515 psia, so flow through relief valve is critical.
46 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
V T Z MW
a
6.32 C K d P1 K b
where :
C Gas constant based on ratio of specific heats C P / CV
341.22 342.19
341.71, from Table 2
2
K b Back - pressure correction factor
1
V 44 10
ft 3 day hr ft 3
6
30556
day 24 hr 60 min min
P1 1200 120 14.7 1335 psia
47 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
Q SGL
a
38 K d KW KV P1 - P2
where :
barrels 42 gal day hr
Q 360 10.5 gpm
day barrel 24 hr 60 min
a
10.5 0.63
38 0.65 10.95 820
0.012 in 2
aTOTAL aL aG
0.012 1.073
V T Z MW
a
6.32 C K d P1 K b
Determine Kb
48 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
500 100
41.6 percent
1200
1.262 in 2
Q SGL
a
38 K d KW KV P1 - P2
where :
KW Correction factor for back - pressure
0.77 for 41.6 percent gauge back - pressure from
Figure 15
10.5 0.63
a
38 0.65 0.77 0.95 820
0.016 in 2
49 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
V T Z MW
a
6.32 C K d P1 K b
1.137 in 2
Q SGL
a
38 K d KW KV P1 - P2
10.5 0.63
a
38 0.65 10.95 820
0.012 in 2
Given:
50 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
1.245
1.245-1
Pcf 100 10 14.7
2
1.245 1
69.3 psia
Pcf is greater than the back-pressure of 517 kPa, so flow through relief valve is subcritical.
Permitted build-up back-pressure of 10 percent of Pset is 10 psi, so total back- pressure = 60 +
10 = 70 psig.
51 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
V ZT MW
a
4645.2 F2 K d P1 P1 - P2
where :
V 25 10 6ft 3
day
hr
day 24 hr 60 min
17,361
ft 3
min
From Figure 14, for r = P 2/P1 = (60 + 10 + 14.7)/(100 + 10 + 14.7) = 0.68, coefficient of
subcritical flow F2 = 0.80.
a
17,361 0.75 460 70 23.2
4645.2 0.80 0.975 124.7 124.7 - 84.7
V T Z MW
a
6.32 C K d P1 K b
Assume Kb = 0.65 for this application. This value would normally be obtained from the
manufacturer.
17,361 460 70 0.75 23.2
a
6.32 341.710.975 124.7 0.65
52 of 53
Design and Calculation of the Pressure Relief Valves and Rupture Disks System
V ZT MW
a
4645.2 F2 K d P1 P1 - P2
a
17,361 0.75 460 70 23.2
4645.2 0.80 0.92 124.7 124.7 - 84.7
References
The following Mobil guides and industry publications shall be considered a part of this EPT. Refer
to the latest editions unless otherwise specified herein.
ASME SEC VIII SISI Units (Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes)
D1
53 of 53