bc-1001 TSH
bc-1001 TSH
bc-1001 TSH
2
The absorbance (450nm) value can be varied due to incubation at 1. Accuracy
different room temperatures in different laboratories. BioCheck, Inc.’s TSH ELISA has been compared to DPC’s
Immulite 2000 3rd Generation TSH test. The methods are similar
in that they are both used for the quantitative determination of TSH
TSH (µIU/mL) Absorbance (450nm) in human serum, and both use TSH calibrated and labeled in
0 0.012 µIU/ml standardized to the WHO hTSH (2nd IRP, 80/558).
0.5 0.112
2.0 0.409 A study was conducted using 39 euthyroid and 20 hypothyroid
5.0 0.979 patient samples (as determined by hospital laboratory analysis).
10.0 1.778 The range of samples tested was 0.4 µIU/mL to 63 µIU/mL. The
25.0 3.296 comparison demonstrated good correlation with another
commercial kit as shown below:
N = 59
3.5
Correlation coefficient = 0.994
3 Slope = 1.027
Intercept = 0.787
2.5 Biocheck Mean = 8.39 µIU/mL
Absorbance (450nm)
PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
3
PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS 65/217) 50 ng/mL 0
200 ng/mL <0.2
4. Recovery and Linearity Studies
a. Recovery 5. Hook Effect
Various patient serum samples of known TSH levels were No hook effect is observed in this assay at TSH concentrations up
combined and assayed in duplicate. The mean recovery to 1,000 µIU/mL.
was 98.9%.
QUALITY CONTROL
Good laboratory practice requires that low, mediumm and high quality
Expected Concentration Observed %
control specimens (controls) be run with each calibration curve to
(µIU/ml) Concentration (µ/ml) Recovery
verify assay performance. To assure proper performance, a
23.94 22.92 95.7%
11.75 11.01 93.6%
statistically significant number of controls should be assayed to establish
5.46 5.53 101.3% mean values and acceptable ranges. Controls containing sodium
2.76 3.04 110.1% azide should not be used.
1.48 1.39 93.9%
STANDARDIZATION
b. Linearity The TSH Reference Standards are calibrated against the World Health
Two patient samples were serially diluted with zero standard Organization’s Second International Reference Preparation of hTSH
to determine linearity. The mean recovery was 94.6%. 2nd IRP-80/558).
# Dilution Expected Observed
Conc. Conc. % Expected LIMITATIONS OF THE PROCEDURE
(µIU/ml) (µIU/ml) 1. Reliable and reproducible results will be obtained when the assay
1. Undiluted 48.39 procedure is carried out with a complete understanding of the
1:2 24.42 22.43 91.9% package insert instructions and with adherence to good
1:4 11.21 10.45 93.2% laboratory practice.
1:8 5.60 5.13 91.6% 2. The results obtained from the use of this kit should be used only
1:16 2.80 2.87 102.5% as an adjunct to other diagnostic procedures and information
1:32 1.40 1.30 92.9% available to the physician.
Average = 94.4% 3. Serum samples demonstrating gross lipemia, gross hemolysis, or
2. Undiluted 36.42 turbidity should not be used with this test.
1:2 18.21 18.10 99.4% 4. The wash procedure is critical. Insufficient washing will result in
1:4 9.10 8.48 93.2% poor precision and falsely elevated absorbance readings.
1:8 4.55 4.28 94.1% 5. The BioCheck TSH assay has not been tested on newborns, and
1:16 2.27 2.22 97.8% is not for use in screening newborns.
1:32 1.13 1.01 89.4%
Average = 94.8% REFERENCES
1. Burger, H. G., Patel, Y. C., Thyrotropin releasing hormone-TSH
6. Specificity Clinic. Endocrinol. and Metab., 6, 831-00(1977).
The following hormones were tested for cross-reactivity: 2. Ezrin, C., The Thyroid, S. C. Werner and S. H. lngbar (eds.),
Harper and Row, Hagerstown, MD, 9, 174-178 (1978).
HORMONE TESTED CONCENTRATION PRODUCED INTENSITY 3. Pierce, J. G., Endocrinology, 89, 1331-1344 (1971).
EQUIVALENT TO TSH 4. Berger, S. and Quinn, J. L., Fund. Clin. Chem., N. W. Tietz (ed.),
(µIUmL)
W. B. Saunders Co., Phila., PA 14, 824-848 (1976).
HCG - (WHO 2nd IS 100 mIU/mL 0
5. Utiger, R. D., The Thyroid, S.C. Werner and S. H. Ingbar (eds.),
61/6) 600 mIU/mL 0
Harper and Row, Hagerstown, MD, 9, 196-205 (1978).
3,500 mIU/mL 0
6. Soos, M. and Siddle, K., J. Immun. Methods, 51, 57-68 (1982).
10,000 mIU/mL 0
200,000 mIU/mL 0
7. Wada, H. G., Danisch, R. J., Baxter, S. R., et al, Clin. Chem.,28,
FSH - (WHO 2nd IRP- 20 mIU/mL 0
1862-1866 (1982).
HMG) 100 mIU/mL 0 8. Snyder, P. J. & Utiger, R. D., J. Clin. Endo. Metab., 34, (1972).
200 mIU/mL <0.2 9. Engall, E., Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 70, VanVunakis, H. &
LH - (WHO 1st IRP 75 mIU/mL 0 Langone, J.J. (eds.), Acad. Press, NY, 419-492(1980).
68/40) 150 mIU/mL 0 10. Uotila, M., Ruoslahti, E. and Engvall, E., J. lmmunol. Methods, 42,
300 mIU/mL <0.2 11-15 (1981).
Prolactin - (WHO 1st 10 ng/mL 0 11. USA Center for Disease Control/National Institute of Health
IRP 75/504) 50 ng/mL 0 Manual, “Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical
200 ng/mL <0.2 Laboratories”, 1984.
hGH - (WHO 1st IRP 10 ng/mL 0
4
12. Clinical Guide to Laboratory Tests. Ed. N.W. Tietz, 3rd Ed., W.B.
Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA 19106, 1995.
TECHNICAL CONSULTATION
Call or Write: BioCheck, Inc.
837 Cowan Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Tel: (650) 259-8425 Fax: (650) 259-8427