Porfolio Management Guidelines
Porfolio Management Guidelines
Porfolio Management Guidelines
www.ogc.gov.uk
Final Public Consultation Draft
Acknowledgements
2
Final Public Consultation Draft
Executive Summary
Introduction
Irrespective of an organisation’s Programme and
Project Management maturity.
Programmes and Projects have dominated the
headlines in recent years, becoming the focus of an Adopting Portfolio Management is a big step for
organisation’s ability to manage Change. But how everyone involved, particularly the Senior
can organisations really be sure that the Management Board, who must be the Portfolio
Programmes and Projects they are delivering are Management champions, and in today’s economic
the right ones? Can Senior Management be sure climate must recognise that using Portfolio
that customer needs will be met, that the Strategic Management is absolutely non-negotiable.
Objectives will be delivered? Can government
departments be certain that their visions and targets
will be achieved? Portfolio Management: what is it?
In times of rapid change, budgetary constraints and Portfolio Management is a co-ordinated collection of
high risk, it is shocking that some organisations strategic processes and decisions that together
continue to waste effort and resources by delivering enable the most effective balance of organisational
the wrong Programmes and Projects. Change and Business as Usual.
This is where Portfolio Management will help. Portfolio Management: why bother?
Portfolio Management is critically important because
it ensures that the ‘right’ Programmes and Projects
are started and the ‘wrong’ ones are not (or are The most recent Cabinet Office research1 identified
stopped if already underway). The right that organisations who adopt a Portfolio
Programmes and Projects are those that collectively Management approach realise benefits through the
make the greatest contribution to an organisation’s following factors.
strategic objectives and targets. • More of the ‘right’ Programmes and Projects
This Portfolio Management guidance provides being undertaken.
flexible principles, including Senior Management • Removal of redundant and duplicated
commitment, alignment of the Organisational Projects.
Governance and Organisational Strategy together
with the use of a Portfolio Office Model working • More effective implementation of
within a culture that is energised and motivated to Programmes and Projects
change. The Portfolio Management Practices are • More efficient resource utilisation.
grouped within two cycles: the Portfolio Definition
Cycle and the Portfolio Delivery Cycle. When the • Greater benefits realisation.
Practices are used to complement existing • Improved transparency, accountability and
organisational structures they will help to facilitate Organisational Governance.
key Portfolio Management activities, such as
prioritisation, balancing, planning and controlled • Improved engagement and communication
delivery, at both an organisational and unit level. between senior management.
Importantly, the guidance highlights that Portfolio
Management is most effective when done ‘top-
down’ across an organisation as a whole, although
some improvements will be seen wherever it is
applied within an organisation. Equally, while
Portfolio Management will be more effective where
robust Programme and Project Management
structures exist, this is not a prerequisite. Portfolio
Management will be effective whenever it is used, 1
Benchmarking Reliable Delivery, June 2008.
3
Final Public Consultation Draft
At the top level all Portfolio Management activities There are a number of misconceptions that can
can be grouped into two cycles: Portfolio Definition cause confusion and detract from the successful
and Portfolio Delivery. Both of these have to be implementation of Portfolio Management.
constant due to the ever-changing environment in • Easy to implement. Implementing Portfolio
which the organisation operates. This model Management will bring about Changes to
(illustrated in Figure S1.0) encapsulates the cyclical Management Board decision making and
and constant activities of Portfolio Definition and Organisational Governance processes.
Portfolio Delivery. Therefore, it is critical that the person or
team leading the development of Portfolio
Management has the necessary skills and
experience.
Benefits
Management
Categorise Understand
Financial
Management
Management
Control
Organisational Risk
Energy Management
Prioritise
Stakeholder
Resource Engagement
Management
Balance Plan
Organisational
Governance
Figure S1.0. Portfolio Management Cycles. • A group of ‘Project people’ that sit in
isolation and produce a plan every year.
Portfolio Management must integrate
What could Portfolio Management be for you? seamlessly within the Organisational
Governance decision-making and Strategic
In practice, Portfolio Management can be used at Planning process.
many different levels within the organisation. For
example, while this guidance focuses at the • Programme or Project Management on a
organisational level of Business Change bigger scale. Programmes and Projects
Management (the totality of an organisation’s focus on implementing Change in the ‘right’
Change), there is no reason why Portfolio way; Portfolio Management is about
Management cannot be used at directorate level, choosing the right Change in order to
within specific business units and even within realise the agreed Strategic Objectives.
individual Programmes.
4
Final Public Consultation Draft
5
Final Public Consultation Draft
6
Final Public Consultation Draft
Keys to Success
Key These are re-emphasised points and real-life lessons learned which aim
to help you become more successful in implementing Portfolio
Management.
7
Final Public Consultation Draft
SROs, Portfolio Office and Strategic Understand the Portfolio Management Principles and
Planning Teams Practices and how this aligns with your current working
practices.
Project Managers, Project Teams, Understand the alignment to Project delivery and the links to
Operational Management and operations and Business as Usual from a strategic
Teams perspective.
Table 1.3. Summary of key stakeholders and the value they can expect to get from reading this guidance.
8
Final Public Consultation Draft
Important Note: It is critical that you do not view this guidance as a cookbook for implementing
Portfolio Management; rather you should read, acknowledging and understanding the discussions,
principles and practices, taking the time to pause occasionally and reflect on how the content relates to
your own organisation. No doubt, you have some elements of Portfolio Management already in place
and whilst they probably will not have the same names, as long as they are adding the value discussed
in this guidance there may be no need to modify your approach.
9
Final Public Consultation Draft
10
Final Public Consultation Draft
11
Final Public Consultation Draft
Overall strategic perspective of Wide scope that changes over Narrow defined scope with
the whole organisation time as requirements and (ideally) no change
solutions are clarified
Office should sit in a Business Office should sit in business area Office should sit in business area
Change Department, strategy or affected or in corporate services affected
finance, reporting directly to
Management Board
PfM Principles
PfM Cycles
4
Managing Successful Programmes Transformational
Flow.
12
Final Public Consultation Draft
Benefits
Management
Categorise Understand
Financial
Management
Management
Control
Organisational Risk
Energy Management
Prioritise
Stakeholder
Resource Engagement
Management
Balance Plan
Organisational
Governance
13
Final Public Consultation Draft
2.5 PfM: What it can be and what it is not Programme and Project Management
together with Strategic Management
The implementation and interpretation of PfM varies experience will create a high risk of failure.
between organisations, and it is assumed that your
existing PfM processes may be slightly different in • A group of ‘Project people’ that sit in
name and practice. This does not mean that what isolation and produce a plan every year.
you are doing is wrong, as long as your PfM PfM must integrate seamlessly within the
structures are aligned to the PfM Principles and PfM Organisational Governance decision-making
Practices providing the target value highlighted in process, align to the Strategic Planning
this guidance. process and ensure the engagement with
2.5.1 What could PfM be for you? many departments, including IT, HR,
Finance, Performance and Commercial.
In practice, PfM can be used at many different levels
within the organisation. For example, while this
Important Note: PfM will not make decisions
guidance focuses at the organisational level of
regarding the content of the Portfolio, changes
Business Change Management (the totality of an
to be included or changes to be stopped; it will,
organisation’s Change), there is no reason why PfM
however, make such recommendations whilst
cannot be used at directorate level, within specific
ensuring the responsibility for making the
business units and even within individual
decision remains with the Management Board.
Programmes5.
14
Final Public Consultation Draft
15
Final Public Consultation Draft
3.1 Purpose of this chapter organisation, and by the appropriate people at the
At this point, you should have a good understanding appropriate level.
of what PfM is and an overall picture of how the PfM
Principles, Cycles and Practices fit together.
Chapter 3 is all about understanding the context of 3.3 How do Changes link to strategy?
PfM, which includes discussions about the links with In almost every case, an organisation’s Strategic
Business as Usual, organisational strategy and Objectives identify some form of improvement. It is
other key teams within the organisation. extremely rare that an organisation’s Strategic
Objectives are to stay the same.
3.2 PfM links to Business as Usual
Linking Changes to the Strategic Objectives can
The relationship between PfM, Business as Usual only be achieved via benefits – i.e. the benefits
and Change is a discussion that takes place in most realised by implementing the Change. In order to
organisations when implementing PfM. In Figure 3.1 successfully realise benefits from the Portfolio, the
this relationship is represented in a simple concept: following two critical prerequisites must be satisfied.
‘Run the business, change the business’. This
describes how PfM and Business as Usual can • A strategy must exist, containing well-
collaboratively realise Strategic Objectives. defined and agreed Strategic Objectives
with associated targets and measures.
• Every Change must have a justifiable
Business Case6 clearly defining the benefits
in sufficient detail to enable alignment to
one or more Strategic Objectives.
16
Final Public Consultation Draft
Figure 3.2 contains a simplified example of the how Important Note: Creating valuable Benefits
benefits from Changes align to Strategic Objectives. Models is a very challenging task. It is usually
This type of modelling can form the basis of more best achieved via the use of team workshops,
detailed Benefits Modelling techniques, which define ensuring the right mix of operational and change
each step of the progression from the Change people. The person leading on creation of the
output to the strategic objective. See Managing Benefits Models will require a good understanding
Successful Programmes (MSP) for more detailed of the business, Changes and the Strategic
examples of benefits and outcome relationship Objectives.
modelling.
17
Final Public Consultation Draft
18
Final Public Consultation Draft
45
During the process of creating the organisational strategy, the Strategic Planning
Team were working extremely closely with the Portfolio Office, primarily because the
Portfolio Office has the most up-to-date information on all Changes and understands
Strategic
how those Changes are contributing to the Strategic Objectives.
Planning
The Strategic Planning Team produced the Annual Plan, which contains a snapshot
of information on the Portfolio and, as such, it was critical that the two teams were
aligned, particularly during reviews and creation of the Annual Plan and the
Organisational Strategy.
Without the expertise of the Performance Management Team the Portfolio Office
would have struggled to identify how each of the Changes adds value to the overall
organisational performance measures. The Performance Team also benefited from
working with the Portfolio Office because they were able to integrate the information
from the Portfolio into the organisational Balanced Scorecard mechanism; they were
Performance involved at the start of Changes and could begin planning the overall organisational
performance.
The Performance Team also provides performance-related support to Changes via
the Portfolio Office. Historically, people did not think about the impact on the
performance before starting a Programme or Project, but the introduction of PfM
ensured that performance was included during the planning stages of every Change.
Working closely with the Programme and Project Management community is key.
The Portfolio Office provided the standards for delivering Programmes and Projects,
provided assistance with planning and helped managers’ work through the steps to
start up. Building a strong relationship with the Programme and Project Managers
PPM Delivery was critical, particularly when the monthly progress reporting mechanism was
Team introduced. The relationship was the key reason why the reporting mechanism was
successfully implemented, because the Programme and Projects knew that the
Portfolio Office would get feedback and support on big issues directly from the
Management Board, whereas historically there was nowhere to escalate to and
everything was a battle.
Changes will almost always impact the structures and working practices of people.
The Portfolio Office engages early on with the HR team so they have an early view
of Changes coming over the horizon, and have input into them. Importantly, training
HR is something that used to be overlooked and the lack of training skills has caused a
few Projects to be delayed in the past. However, since the Portfolio Office made
sure that HR were involved during the planning and prioritisation, the training
department knew how to align resources to priorities which pleased everyone.
19
Final Public Consultation Draft
The Business Architecture Team (sometimes called Design Authority and situated in
Strategic Planning, Finance or IT Departments) manage the overall organisational
Blueprint (sometimes referred to as the Future Operating Model). This defines the
current and the future organisational design in terms of working practices and
Business
processes, information requirements and the technology that supports its
Architecture
operations. Because each of the Programmes created a Blueprint during the start, it
Planning
was possible to align it to the Organisational Blueprint. The Business Architecture
Team were involved in creating Programme Blueprints, aligning them at the start,
and assisted with the analysis of any proposed modifications via the Change Control
process.
The Centre of Excellence (COE) formed part of the Portfolio Office, which was
important because this was a key Knowledge Management area. The COE was
Centre of involved in the implementation of the Business Change Lifecycle and assisted the
Excellence Portfolio Office in the assurance of consistency of information. The COE was
involved in the resource capacity planning due to its focus on training across the full
Portfolio.
The optimal real estate flexes with the shape and functions of the organisation.
Real Estate and Major changes to staff numbers (up or down) or to working practices required
Property various changes to property. Equally, there were additional opportunities in terms of
Services relocation to other areas, which helped maximise the use and availability of staff and
other resources.
20
Final Public Consultation Draft
PfM Principles
PfM Cycles
21
Final Public Consultation Draft
4.3 Senior Management commitment As part of the Business Change Lifecycle, the
Management Board make the decision on
The Target Situation whether or not new Changes can start. They
actually like this involvement because they all have
The commitment from our Management Board was to make the decision that puts them in control. If the
critical in the adoption of PfM within the starting of a Change is agreed, it is added to the
organisation. Once the Management Board Portfolio reporting and included in the monthly
received the report that defined the current Management Dashboard that provides the
position of all of the Changes and highlighted the Management Board with the key information on
fact that lots of Changes could not be aligned to Portfolio level progress, strategic risks and issues,
our strategy, they understood that PfM was needed dependencies and recommendations for any
to ensure that Changes were not only delivered Management Board decisions.
successfully but that the right Changes were
implemented. The Management Board recognised The Management Dashboard is created by the
there was a strong need for enhanced Portfolio Office, which works closely with all
collaborative working and a standard way to Projects, Programmes and key departments.
manage change if they were to make informed
decisions. This is particularly important regarding
communications and the internal communications
team are heavily involved with the Portfolio
It was the Director of Business Change who Office, together ensuring that all departmental
ensured that the Management Board mandated the communication teams are engaged so regular and
use of a P3O Model in the form of a Portfolio right messages can be sent out with the
Office. The Management Board subsequently Management Board’s support. This helps people to
endorsed the use of our own standard Business see direct leadership from the top of the
Change Lifecycle (which every Programme and organisation.
Project now uses as a standard) and were engaged
as the key decision makers in the categorisation Furthermore, because of this collaborative working,
and prioritisation of all the Changes within the when a Change attracts a ‘red’ status, it is not
Portfolio. This prompted some very interesting viewed as a personal failing any more, but is seen
discussions, one of which led to a Management more as an area that requires teamwork and
Board decision to stop three Projects. This had remedial action by the Management Board. When
never happened before. this happens, everyone works together to bring it
back on track.
22
Final Public Consultation Draft
At the very start, produce a report defining the current status and alignment of
Understanding now
Changes (or lack of alignment) to the Strategic Objectives.
The roles of Management Board members (and the PfM team) are understood
Defined roles
and agreed.
Resources for a Management Board agree the resources to implement a Portfolio Office.
Portfolio Office agreed
Management Board Management Board must make decisions regarding the categorisation and
make decisions prioritisation of Changes within the Portfolio.
Business Change A standard Business Change Lifecycle is used for all Changes, which defines all
Lifecycle decision points and accountabilities (including Management Boards).
Complement existing PfM Governance is built into Senior Management existing structures and not an
structures additional overhead.
23
Final Public Consultation Draft
4.4 Organisational Governance Alignment Once the Business Change Lifecycle was agreed,
the Management Board became involved at key
The Target Situation
decision points and ensured that decisions
A perception once existed that Project people deal concerning PfM and Business as Usual were not
with the Programmes and Projects and the rest of made in isolation. This helped significantly with
us deal with the real business. This was caused communications because the Management Board
primarily because the Management Board were understood their role and became visible key
not provided with a clear description of all the champions of PfM.
Changes within the organisation (Changes were
something that just happened). Furthermore, there
was no single Management Board member The Portfolio Progress Group continued but with a
responsible for managing the organisation’s Change modified remit to review all new Changes and
activities, such as a Director of Business Change. make recommendations to the Portfolio
Direction Group, in addition to retaining its key
A Director of Business Change was later
focus on the detailed status of the Portfolio.
employed, with the key responsibility to
Members of the Portfolio Direction Group were
implement PfM across the organisation. A
usually members of other key organisational boards,
Portfolio Progress Group was set up to oversee
such as the Finance Board or the IT Board, which
the PfM implementation, with the Director of
enhanced communications and enabled more
Business Change as the Chair. The Portfolio
collaborative working.
Progress Group consisted of heads of departments
from key departments (such as IT, Procurement and To ensure that existing board structures were
HR) and SROs of the Changes (not Management aligned within the PfM mechanisms, the Portfolio
Board members). Although it was useful for the Office made sure that the appropriate processes
people to meet and discuss detailed progress, after were in place to support decision making at every
a while it was clear that the Portfolio Progress level of the Portfolio. The Portfolio Office also set up
Group had the expertise to make recommendations, the PM Forum, which was a monthly meeting
but key decisions relating to the start-up and where all Programme and Project Managers
recovery actions needed to take place at would attend to discuss progress and key issues.
Management Board level. This was a particularly useful communication
mechanism for everyone that attended.
Finally, the Portfolio Progress Group meeting was
With this in mind, and without wanting to set up a
moved to precede the Portfolio Direction Group,
new Management Board meeting, the Director of
which enabled the Portfolio Direction Group to
Business Change obtained agreement to add a one-
have the most recent information as well as being
hour agenda item called Portfolio Direction Group
able to address escalations from the Portfolio
to the existing monthly Strategy Day meeting
Progress Group relatively quickly, which pleased
(attended by all Management Board members).
the Programme and Project Managers.
24
Final Public Consultation Draft
Figure 4.2. Example of PfM Governance structure. Important Note: The naming convention of
Portfolio Direction Group and Portfolio Progress
Group is used for consistency only and
Example Terms of Reference for the Portfolio organisations should not feel restricted to using
Direction and Progress Groups can be found in this in their own PfM structures. Equally, the PfM
Appendix 2, along with draft role descriptions for two Governance structure in Figure 4.2 contains
key roles, Director of Change and Portfolio suggested PfM roles – these are not mandated but
Management. All other role descriptions (or the logic should be followed, i.e. that a
variations thereof) can be found within P3O, MSP or Management Board member champions PfM and
PRINCE2 and therefore are not included in this that some form of Portfolio Manager role exists to
guidance. co-ordinate the Portfolio delivery on a day-to-day
basis
25
Final Public Consultation Draft
4.5.2 Multi-level Portfolios: more than These strategies will identify Changes that need to
Portfolios, Programmes and Projects? happen in order to deliver departmental Strategic
Objectives. However, some of them will be
Some organisations may require more complex
important enough that they add direct benefits to the
Portfolio Governance structures, particularly in the
organisational strategy. This is where the confusion
case where the hierarchy of Change has many
can start: if a Change is important enough and adds
levels or a number of organisations are working
organisation-level benefits, it will usually be included
together. For example, some organisations have
in the Organisational Portfolio, which then triggers
more than just Portfolios, Programmes and Projects.
questions about ownership, decision making and
There could be an organisation-level Portfolio, a
budgets.
Portfolio for each department, work-streams within
those Portfolios and Programmes, and Projects Some organisations choose to mandate that every
within them. In addition some organisations use Change is included within the Organisational
other terminology, such as ‘Strands’ or ‘Super Portfolio. This means there is a clear overview of all
Programmes’. Changes within the organisation, which can be
aligned to the Strategic Objectives. It also a better
While it is important to ensure that people
opportunity to understand the entire Change
understand the naming conventions for the multiple
resource capacity and requirements. However, the
levels, the critical point is that the structures must be
value of this will only be realised if the organisation
supported by clearly defined processes for
is already good at capacity planning (and most are
escalation, decision making, delegation (which may
not).
be aligned to financial sign-off level), planning and
reporting. Organisations that do not put all Changes in the
Organisational Portfolio usually group the Changes
In all cases, particularly with multi-level Portfolios,
in some way based on the level of the strategy. For
an effective P3O Model will be crucial to success.
example, Changes that directly benefit the
4.5.3 Should every Change be in the Organisational Strategic Objectives and those that
Organisational Portfolio? benefit only unit/departmental objectives.
In some organisations there will be various levels of
strategies which together will align to the
organisational strategy. For example, an
organisational strategy will exist for the entire
organisation and within that it is not uncommon for Important Note: The example governance
there to be an IT strategy, HR strategy and Estates provided in this section is relatively simple.
strategy (amongst others). There are other important considerations to
be borne in mind when designing a Portfolio
Governance structure that will be completely
dependent on your organisation’s structure,
culture, decision-making abilities and current
maturity in terms of delivering change.
26
Final Public Consultation Draft
Existing management Portfolio decisions are incorporated into existing Management Board
structures meetings where Business as Usual and the Portfolio are discussed. In
very large organisations selected decisions may be delegated to an
existing formal sub-board (chaired by Management Board members).
Strategic understanding The Director of Change (or equivalent) provides clarity of all the Changes
of Changes and and their current status, using the Management Dashboard.
progress
Escalations and Portfolio Progress Group provides escalations and recommendations to
recommendations Portfolio Direction Group regarding proposed new Changes, prioritisation,
top risks and issues.
Effective processes The Portfolio Office manages clearly defined processes, ensuring that
correct information is provided to relevant decision makers at each level of
the Portfolio.
Communication Decisions are proactively communicated to the Portfolio in line with the
Stakeholder Engagement processes.
Align meetings where Irrespective of the number of levels in your organisation, try to ensure that
possible key meetings are scheduled as close to each other a possible. This will
lead to more effective decisions due to the timely provision of information
and recommendations.
Share knowledge Provide an environment where Programme and Project Managers can
communicate, share knowledge and learn lessons from experiences.
27
Final Public Consultation Draft
28
Final Public Consultation Draft
In order to support the first step, the Portfolio At this time, the functions of particular importance
Office will be able to provide the most up-to-date provided by the Portfolio Office will be as follows.
information on the current Changes. The
• Analysis of the existing Changes currently
Management Board and the Strategy Team (often
being delivered.
the owners of the Strategic Planning process) will
• Assessment of those Changes based on
need this in order to identify where they are
the new Strategic Objectives.
before they can discuss where they want to go.
• Facilitation of top-level Portfolio planning
Supporting the second step, the Portfolio Office regarding the proposed new Changes to
will lead the work that is required to define the be included.
Portfolio and the Changes that need to be • Collation and definition of those Changes
included in order to realise the agreed Strategic into a Portfolio Delivery Strategy that
Objectives. The Practices within the Portfolio categorises and prioritises the Changes.
Definition Cycle provide the focused support at
this time. This ensures that the existing Changes Figure 4.3 outlines the Strategic Planning
continue to be delivered. process and the alignment of PfM.
29
Final Public Consultation Draft
The Portfolio Office leads on the Portfolio-related activities, ensuring alignment with the
Portfolio Office
Strategic Planning process.
leadership
A full review of the Portfolio should happen on a regular basis (every six months works
Regularly review well in many organisations).
Business Use of Business Change Lifecycle will ensure that the Management Board are involved in
Change decision making regarding which Changes will contribute most to the Strategic Objectives.
Lifecycle
Benefits of each Change are defined in the Business Case. This will allow performance
Benefits in
contribution to be understood.
Business Cases
Involvement of key departments in early Business Case impact assessment enhances
Early
collaborative working and quality of Business Case.
involvement
improves quality
30
Final Public Consultation Draft
31
Final Public Consultation Draft
32
Final Public Consultation Draft
33
Final Public Consultation Draft
4.10 Energised change culture aligned to the Strategic Objectives and focused
on performance. In some cases the actual
success of the Portfolio was linked to people’s
The Target Situation objectives and bonuses.
We were launching the five-year strategy and An HR Project was also included in the Portfolio,
decided to introduce PfM at the same time as which focused on people’s well-being. We
the launch. We did this for a number of reasons. asked people what they wanted and, most
First, because we knew that the improvements in importantly, we listened and implemented the
the strategy (which formed our Strategic ideas where we could. This included better
Objectives) were extremely tough and high risk, facilities, such as a crèche and gym, flexible
and that they would only be realised if everyone working time, more appealing office interior, home
pushed in the same direction. working, investment in training and a range of
other things which seemed to have an almost
Secondly, we were conscious of an internal
instantaneous positive effect.
perception that ‘the strategy is just a document
that gets produced and does not really affect me’. Communication became a critical aspect when
Finally, we felt that, while a clear strategy is the Changes started to deliver successfully,
critical in terms of talking about where you are because historically people did not have the time
going and how you are going to get there, we or the energy to celebrate success. This is not the
needed a vehicle to actually get us there, so case now, and we make sure that everyone
the introduction of PfM was seen as that knows when there has been a success. In
vehicle. return, when things are tough, people work to
make it a success.
This presented us with a challenge: we needed to
make the team (the whole organisation) feel
engaged, inspired and motivated. Someone
asked ‘Do we have the energy for all this
change?’ and there was a realisation that the
organisation as a whole needed to be energised.
Historically the organisational strategy was
created by the Management Board alone.
However, this time a number of consultation
workshops were used before it was published,
which enabled people to be engaged and
present questions directly to the Management
Board.
The Management Board’s communication of
the strategy and the Portfolio was designed to
be much more informative and compelling, and it
translated the strategy into real-life situations in a
way that people could instantly relate to. There
was a key message that people working in the
organisation were viewed as part of one team
and not just departments. Everyone was
important to the new strategy, everyone had to
be engaged and everyone needed to feel
ownership. A key part of this was to review
people’s objectives (starting with the Management
Board) and make sure they were accurate,
34
Final Public Consultation Draft
Collaborative working View the organisation as one team and focus on creating a collaborative
Business Change focused environment.
Proactive Ensure that regular, proactive and compelling communication is published
communications from the Management Board, particularly communicating decisions made and
successes from the Portfolio Direction Group.
Share information Share information within and across teams and create a learning environment
in which everyone can take part – online learning centres and lessons
learned presentations work very well.
Business Change Use of a standard Business Change Lifecycle used by all Programmes and
Lifecycle Projects to enable people to understand what they need to do and to work in
standard way.
Effective processes Portfolio Office processes (including Portfolio Reporting) must add value and
be perceived as consistent, transparent, accurate, objective and fair. In
addition, there are a number of other organisational processes that must be
effectively aligned to those of PfM to ensure success, such as financial and
Strategic Planning processes.
Roles and relationships Document roles and relationships with individuals and groups. Communicate
creatively and effectively, ensuring that the role descriptions focus on
performance and help people to understand their links to the Strategic
Objectives.
Listen Involve people, listen to them and get them to contribute. Ensure that they
can see how their contribution has been incorporated into the Portfolio.
35
Final Public Consultation Draft
5.1 Purpose of this chapter Why Cycles and not stages or steps?
This chapter discusses in detail the two PfM Cycles The PfM Cycles and PfM Practices are both
(Portfolio Definition and Portfolio Delivery), with completely interrelated and continuously working at
Chapters 6 and 7 discussing the PfM Practices varying speeds. As such, the PfM Model does not
found within each Cycle. have a mandated starting point, middle or end.
In these chapters, each of the PfM Cycles and PfM Different organisations have different triggers and
Practices are discussed by answering the following needs to start using PfM, which could come in the
questions. form of a cut in budgets, an external event or a
sudden realisation that ‘We can’t keep doing
• What is the purpose?
everything’. Similarly, organisations will usually have
• What happens if we do this well? different starting points, which can be dependent on
many things, including their existing Portfolio,
• What happens if we do not do this well?
Programme and Project Management capability,
culture, financial position and leadership.
5.2 PfM Cycles As long as an organisation is energised to start
using any of the PfM Practices, and that energy is
The PfM Cycles were introduced in Chapter 2, but it
maintained, it will begin rotating the Cycles and the
is useful to review the diagram again here to refresh
interrelated nature of the PfM Practices will
your memory (see Figure 5.1).
automatically instigate the use of other PfM
Figure 5.1. PfM Cycles and PfM Practices.
Practices at a pace relative to the amount of effort
that is invested.
Benefits
Management
Categorise Understand
Financial
Management
Management
Control
Organisational Risk
Energy Management
Prioritise
Stakeholder
Resource Engagement
Management
Balance Plan
Organisational
Governance
36
Final Public Consultation Draft
5.2.1 If you are saying there is no defined start, • A planned approach and confirmed Senior
how do you start to implement PfM? Management buy-in significantly reduces
the risk of failure.
Most organisations start using PfM by one of two
• In the majority of cases, the Creation
ways, or in some cases using a combination of both. approach will be quicker.
For the benefit of this guidance, the two approaches
will be described as Creation and Evolution, To support the Creation approach of implementing
described in Table 5.2. PfM, OGC’s P3O guidance contains a
recommended implementation lifecycle that can be
used to implement the Portfolio Office. Following
Implementing PfM is viewed as a this lifecycle will guide the implementation of the
Business Change Project in its own PfM processes and procedures in a structured and
right and is therefore planned in planned way.
detail with specific targets and
outputs and agreed by the
Management Board. Although the 5.2.3 Why does Organisational Energy link the
starting position on the PfM Cycles PfM Cycles?
Creation is not mandated, the optimum
Organisational Energy will be a new expression to
position would be by progressing
many people (and possibly a reminder of the 1970s
through the Portfolio Definition
to others).
Cycle starting with the ‘Understand’
PfM Practice whilst the existing However, the use of the phrase is extremely
Change continues to be delivered. significant because, similar to PfM itself, it is a
relatively new and rapidly evolving reality within
management practices. Organisational Energy is
Implementing PfM does not have a defined by the NHS Institute for Innovation and
defined plan; it is more about Improvement8 as ‘the extent to which an
evolution. As soon as the first PfM organisation has mobilised the full available effort of
Practice becomes useful, its its people in pursuit of its goals’.
interrelationships with all other PfM
It is not within the scope of this guidance to further
Practices means the others begin
Evolution develop the field of Organisational Energy.
working too. Provided that the
However, it is critical to appreciate that, while PfM
momentum of effort is sustained,
will provide principles and practices to enable
the PfM Cycles rotate to a point
informed decision making, it is the collective effort of
where effective PfM is being used
the people (and the effective management of that
and the desired PfM maturity is
effort) within the organisation that will be the
achieved.
deciding factor on whether or not the Strategic
Objectives are achieved.
Table 5.2. Creation and Evolution approaches to
Therefore, Organisational Energy, from the
implementing PfM.
perspective of PfM, refers to a collection of critical
5.2.2 What is the best approach? organisational elements – including leadership,
direction, management, motivation, well-being,
Either approach can be suitable for different effective communication, teamwork, skills and
organisations. However, the optimum way of experience – all of which must come together in
implementing PfM would be to adopt the Creation order to release the organisation’s collective energy
approach. The reasons for this are as follows. in the right direction.
• Planning the implementation of Changes is
recognised Best Practice. 8
Organisational Energy in the NHS, by Stanton Morris,
May 2007.
37
Final Public Consultation Draft
38
Final Public Consultation Draft
No evidence, and therefore limited confidence, that Changes will enhance Business
Strategic Objectives
as Usual and achieve Strategic Objectives.
Resources are wasted because they are not aligned to priorities. Timescales
continually slip and run over budget because resources are not allocated effectively
Resources
to the most important Changes. On occasions, Changes are implemented and cause
operational disruption, triggering further resource issues for recovery.
There is no consensus view of which Changes need to be delivered, Changes are
not prioritised and people have to battle continuously for resources that are quite
Which Change?
possibly already working over capacity. New changes appear from nowhere and no
one is really sure what they are delivering.
Changes that do not support the Strategic Objectives, or even Changes that impact
Existing ‘rogue’ negatively on the Strategic Objectives, continue to be delivered. Even though people
Changes may know there are ‘rogue’ Changes, there is no mechanism to prove it or make a
decision to stop the Change.
Heightened political intensity and reduced organisational teamwork exists,
particularly at Senior Management levels, due to a lack of understanding of the
Teamwork Changes and links to Strategic Objectives. People have to battle for resources and
do not have the energy or desire to work collaboratively. People do not feel
committed to the organisation and many people may be looking for other jobs.
Senior Management will not have a collective view of the future and therefore cannot
lead towards it or communicate the end state and the new organisation. Decision
Leadership making at the top level is not forthcoming, which causes more confusion within the
organisation. People are not motivated to invest time writing Business Cases,
planning or implementing Changes using Best Practice because they do not have to.
Many people are saying many things and it is hard to understand what is going on.
Mixed messages cause continual fire-fighting in order to correct stakeholder
Communication
perceptions. Key internal and external key stakeholders feel excluded and are not
happy.
Teams delivering the Change and teams receiving the Change are not motivated or
Motivation
energised to change due to limited leadership and support from Senior Management.
Lack of PfM process and leadership support creates a de-motivated working
Staffing environment, which causes key people with key skills to leave the organisation
before the Change is implemented.
39
Final Public Consultation Draft
6.1 Purpose of this chapter Changes; they will also require information from
other areas of the organisation, including
This chapter provides a detailed discussion of the
performance information, budget positions, and
PfM Practices found within the Portfolio Definition
SWOT and PESTLE analyses.
Cycle. For ease of reading, each PfM Practice is
described by answering the following two questions. Once the Strategic Objectives are defined, the next
step is to identify a collection of proposed Changes
• What is the purpose?
that will deliver those objectives. This will usually
• What is involved? involve another Management Board meeting and it
is essential that the Portfolio Office facilitates or
Important Note: All PfM Practices are attends this particular meeting, because not only
discussed by providing examples of how can it provide a framework for identifying Changes –
organisations have made use of them. It is i.e. capturing the key information – but during the
critical that you appreciate fully your own discussions it can prompt questions such as initial
existing processes before you implement any thoughts on priority and resources considerations,
of the following within your organisation. which are often forgotten in the freedom of blue sky
thinking.
6.2 PfM Practice 1: Understand The output of this meeting will be strategic-level
proposed Changes that will include a number of
existing Changes. This is the point at which you can
6.2.1 What is the purpose? start to define the proposed Change in more detail
During the Strategic Planning process, Strategic and it is this information that will provide the level of
Objectives will be created. In order to create these, understanding required to categorise and prioritise
the Management Board will need to understand the Portfolio.
information relating to the existing Changes within The Portfolio Office will clarify the detail of each
the organisation. During the agreement of the Change by consulting with the relevant
Strategic Objectives the Management Board will Management Board members (and their teams).
discuss existing Changes and proposed new Capturing this information can be challenging,
Changes, all of which need to be analysed in more particularly if the information does not already exist
detail as part of the Portfolio Definition Cycle. or if it concerns future Changes which might still be
a mere concept. Therefore, working through a
standard template (such as a Programme and
6.2.2 What is involved? Project Information Template) will help to capture
During the Strategic Planning process the Portfolio the correct and standard information for each
Office will be working closely with the Strategy Change. See Appendix 4 for suggested contents of
Team. In order to enhance the Management Board’s a Programme and Project Information Template.
setting of Strategic Objectives, the Portfolio Office
will provide a collection of information relating to a Important Note: When all of this information is
review of the existing Portfolio (or, if a Portfolio does collated and the Portfolio Office has undertaken
not yet exist, the Portfolio Office would have initial analysis, it is worth drafting an interim
undertaken a review of existing Changes). report and issuing it to the Management Board
for information. At that point, be sure to highlight
The Management Board will not create the Strategic that initial categorisation and prioritisation is
Objectives by using only the review of existing currently being undertaken based on the
information.
40
Final Public Consultation Draft
Portfolio Office The Portfolio Office should facilitate the Management Board meeting that
facilitates planning identifies of proposed Changes.
meeting
Engaging Management When the Portfolio Office works with the Management Board members
Board and teams and their teams, populating the Programme and Project Information
Template, it should be seen as a good opportunity to build relationships.
Interim report Collation of all populated Programme and Project Information Templates
into an interim report will ensure that the Management Board maintain
involvement and understand the other activities taking place.
41
Final Public Consultation Draft
6.3 PfM Practice 2: Categorise Figures 6.1 and 6.2 are simplistic, yet powerful,
examples of Portfolio categorisation. They highlight
Strategic Objectives, their Portfolio categories and
6.3.1 What is the purpose? how the proposed Changes are aligned.
Categorisation helps to organise the Changes into From this it is possible to see that proposed Change
groups of similar organisational needs based on the number 6 is not aligned to any strategic objective
Strategic Objectives (or other grouping as required). and should be removed. It is also clear that the
‘partnership working’ category has no Change
aligned to it and should either be removed as a
6.3.2 What is involved? category or Changes added if needed.
Organisations will categorise Changes in different Once each Change has been aligned to a category,
ways. Some might be based on direct Strategic the data can be modified and represented in various
Objective alignment – i.e. the category is the same formats. It is particularly useful (especially for the
theme as the objective – and some might be based Management Board) to review this early balance of
on the type of technology – i.e. web services, the Portfolio in a graphical format, as seen in Figure
disaster recovery and networks. 6.2.
For the benefit of this guidance, focus will be on the It is worth highlighting that the relationship of
use of categories that are based directly on the Change to category may not always be a one-to-one
themes of the Strategic Objectives. Sometimes it relationship, and in such cases you should be
may be suitable to break down the category into particularly careful to ensure that the links from the
sub-categories. For example, ‘Reducing the fear of Changes to the Strategic Objectives are well
crime’ as a category is too broad, so it would be defined.
useful to have a number of sub-categories to
Please note that all information is used purely for
increase the focus and alignment of each Change.
illustration purposes.
The information captured in the Programme and
Project Information Template can be used to identify
which category (or sub-category) the proposed Important Note: At whatever point PfM is
Change should be aligned to. This is achieved by implemented, it is highly likely that an
linking the benefits to the category in question. organisation already has a number of
In mature PfM environments there may be ‘entry changes in progress. These must be
criteria’ for a given category – i.e. only Changes that included when considering the scope of the
contribute x amount of value to the strategic Portfolio.
objective will be included.
Only when you have aligned the proposed Changes
to the categories for the first time and undertaken
initial analysis will you see early signs as to the
balance of the Portfolio.
42
Final Public Consultation Draft
43
Final Public Consultation Draft
Important Note: Getting to this position is an achievement and it is always interesting to see the
trends that were not recognised before, such as categories having too much change assigned to
them or gaps where no change is assigned. In the example above, failure to go through just this
key practice alone would have meant that 33% of the Improve Public Access to Service Strategic
Objective would not have been delivered!
Beware: During this process you may have identified that some proposed Changes do not
contribute to the Strategic Objectives. The communication of these must be managed very
carefully as there is a high chance that the Change should be stopped. If this is the case, it would
be the first time a change has been rejected, which is a big indication of improvement.
Categorisation allows you to see for the first time the balance of all the
Balance for the first
Changes across the categories.
time
The use of creative graphical representation helps to understand the
Be creative contribution of the Changes to the Strategic Objectives.
Ensure Management Board are kept fully up to date with the work
being carried out, be especially clear if the analysis indicates that some
Communicate
existing changes are not aligned to the strategic objectives.
44
Final Public Consultation Draft
45
Final Public Consultation Draft
46
Final Public Consultation Draft
Priority
Score
High Reject
8 1
5 3
4
Level of Risk Med 2
Consider
7
6
Low High
Med
Benefits Return
47
Final Public Consultation Draft
Focus minds The prioritisation practice focuses people’s minds on the most important
Changes and clearly identifies the Changes that are least important.
Tailored for your The prioritisation criteria must be suitable for your organisation and can
organisation include reputational risk, political need, and a weighted measure for the
contribution to the Organisational Blueprint (or Future Operating Model).
Management Board Management Board must agree the prioritisation criteria and are the key
involvement decision makers regarding the final prioritised Changes.
Weighted scoring helps Weighted prioritisation criteria help to rank the Changes.
Prioritise each Change Work through the prioritisation criteria for each proposed Change.
Be creative Be creative with how you represent the findings. Graphical representation can
be particularly useful.
48
Final Public Consultation Draft
6.5 PfM Practice 4: Balance It is rare that a balanced Portfolio will be agreed
from a single meeting, so the Portfolio Office should
be prepared to go back and modify the balance to
6.5.1 What is the purpose? accommodate amendments.
Balancing a Portfolio means juggling all Portfolio
elements in order to find the ideal mix of Changes.
6.5.3 Being creative to support decision
For example, the mix that has the greatest potential
making
to collectively achieve the organisation’s Strategic
Objectives within the constraints of resources The value added by the Portfolio Office should
(money, people, facilities, etc.), time and risk. include the development of creative and easy-to-
understand representations of the balanced
Portfolio. Sending one chart with all the information
6.5.2 What is involved? to the Management Board will definitely not suffice
in this situation.
Whilst some form of balancing occurs throughout
the Portfolio Definition Cycle, it is only when the The bubble matrix in Figure 6.5 provides a good
collection of proposed Changes are categorised, example of how to graphically represent Changes
prioritised and viewed together with other key based on budget, risk and benefit return. In addition
organisational information that detailed analysis and to this, you should consider what other elements are
balancing decisions can be made. important to your organisation’s Portfolio and how
they relate to organisational constraints.
Balancing is not achieved by the Portfolio Office
working on one spreadsheet in isolation; other The following are examples of information that is
information is required from various teams within the useful to graphically represent.
organisation. This will consist of resource capacity,
• High-level Portfolio showing indication of
organisational performance information, asset
resource availability.
management and organisational financial
information. • Cost of investment per category.
It is for this reason that the Portfolio Office must • Percentage contribution towards Strategic
work collaboratively with other departments, Objectives by category.
ensuring a joined up approach.
• Overall cost profile based on initial schedule.
While there are many books on the process of
• Areas of the organisation impacted by the
balancing a Portfolio, the application to an
totality of Changes.
organisation is perhaps more individual than any
other PfM Practice. It can be complex and time • Anticipated performance Changes based on
consuming. Therefore, it is unrealistic to expect the initial Portfolio schedule.
Management Board to be involved directly. The
• Risk associated with each category.
Portfolio Office must keep the Management Board
up to date while they lead on relevant consultations • Resource levels and capability.
via workshops or individual meetings.
Only after this consultation and analysis can the
Portfolio Office present to the Management Board
the proposed balanced Portfolio together with
supporting recommendations. Bear in mind that
many organisations implement far too many
Changes at the same time and it is therefore not
uncommon for the recommendations to include the
closure or one or more Changes.
49
Final Public Consultation Draft
Important Note: Portfolio and Programme Management software packages can be extremely
useful when balancing because most packages enable a range of constraints to be added and
changed to suit your organisation. Provided that the software has been configured correctly and is
populated with the right information, various calculations and balancing analyses can be instantly
available.
50
Final Public Consultation Draft
6.6 PfM Practice 5: Plan The Portfolio Delivery Strategy should be presented
to the Management Board by the Director of
Change. While the name of the various sections in
6.6.1 What is the purpose? the Portfolio Delivery Strategy may vary between
organisations, the value realised from them should
The Planning Practice focuses on collating
not.
information from the Portfolio Definition Cycle (along
with other planning information where required) and Appendix 5 contains a description of the key value
creating a Portfolio Delivery Strategy. The objective that should be realised from the Portfolio Delivery
of the Portfolio Delivery Strategy is to enable all Strategy.
stakeholders to understand the Portfolio and, most
importantly, to enable the Management Board to
make informed decisions regarding the content and Important Note: Some elements of the Portfolio
delivery. Delivery Strategy have not been described in detail
in this guidance. Comprehensive guidance for
areas such as Risk Management, Benefits
6.6.2 What is involved? Realisation Management, Blueprint,
Creation of the Portfolio Delivery Strategy is a Communications Planning, Stakeholder
complex process. It is completely individual to your Engagement, Business Case development and
organisation and extremely challenging. It will Portfolio Office set-up are available in other OGC
undoubtedly vary in both format and name. published guidance and online at www.ogc.gov.uk.
Depending on your organisation, it could be a single
document, a presentation or a collection of new and
existing documents. Some organisations may call it
6.7 Dependency Management
a Strategic Delivery Plan, a Portfolio Plan or a
Change Strategy. A critical part of any plan at any level of Business
Change – be it Project, Programme or Portfolio – is
Irrespective of the name and format in your
dependencies. Within a simple Project this is
organisation, fundamentally the Portfolio Delivery
relatively easy, but in a complex Programme and
Strategy should contain concise and accurate
Portfolio environment it is particularly challenging to
information, so that when presented appropriately it
identify, track and manage dependencies effectively.
will enable the Management Board to make
informed decisions regarding the following. The P3O is critical to the success of this because,
as part of the planning process, the dependencies
• Confirmation of the Portfolio scope,
should be identified within each Project, Programme
categories, prioritisation and schedule of
and Business Plan. It is also the responsibility of the
Changes included in the Portfolio.
P3O to work with the Programme and Project
• Key benefits, impacts on performance, Managers to ensure that dependency information is
contribution to Strategic Objectives and accurately summarised at the Portfolio level within
Public Service Agreement (PSA) Targets. Management Dashboards.
• The estimated overall resource If dependencies are not managed properly there is a
requirements (including skills and finance) high risk that that the Plans at all levels will not be
and capacity to change. realistic. Furthermore, when Changes occur within
• Key risk areas and key issues that need the Portfolio it will be very difficult to assess the
immediate resolution. overall impact.
51
Final Public Consultation Draft
52
Final Public Consultation Draft
6.8 Portfolio capability, capacity and resourcing Planning the most effective use of internal resources
must be balanced against engaging external
An important factor to be taken into account during
resources with appropriate skills and capability. It
the PfM Definition Cycle (and also as part of
may be more cost effective to delay a Programme or
Resource Management during the PfM Delivery
Project until the appropriately skilled internal
Cycle) is the organisation’s ability to deliver its
resources are available. However, organisational
commitments through a suitably skilled resource
strategy may dictate fixed delivery timescales, in
base.
which case external staff will need to be employed.
This is an example of how Resource and Capacity
Plans can help with forward planning for recruitment
The key questions to ask are as follows.
and training, whether on a permanent or temporary
• Do we have the right people with the skills basis.
and capabilities to deliver the Portfolio? and
Without effective resource and capacity planning,
• Are those people available in a timely
‘just in time’ recruitment may incur delivery delays or
manner to meet the commitments of the
Portfolio? excessive costs, or in some cases both. The P3O
main guidance provides more details on capacity
planning for Resource Management.
Each Programme and Project within the Portfolio will
require one or more people to deliver products and
carry out tasks. These people require specific skills
Important Note: While it was highlighted previously
and capabilities to carry out their assigned roles. As
that PfM is not just ‘bigger Programme
part of the planning process within the Business
Management’, the Portfolio Delivery Strategy has
Change Lifecycle, each Programme and Project
similarities with the Programme Definition within
must schedule the required skills and resources,
Managing Successful Programmes (MSP).
including those required from the Business as Usual
Therefore, you should ensure familiarity with MSP
functions. All this information will contribute to
before creating the Portfolio Delivery Strategy.
Resource Plans at Project, Programme and Portfolio
level.
In a Portfolio, the Resource Plans of all
Programmes and Projects should be amalgamated
to enable an understanding of the Portfolio resource
requirements – i.e. what resources (people with
skills and capability) are required and for what time
periods.
A key PfM function is to flex this Portfolio view and
negotiate resources with stakeholders to ensure
best use across the entire Portfolio, while taking into
account the operational needs and requirements.
This should be complemented by a forward-looking
capacity plan highlighting commitments and
availability (including holidays, courses, etc.).
Therefore, the capacity plan can be used in planning
new Programmes and Projects to show where spare
capacity exists. Capacity planning should be aligned
with the risk and issues process, as it is surprisingly
common for entire Programmes to stop due to one
key person’s absence through illness.
53
Final Public Consultation Draft
The Portfolio Delivery Strategy is the main output from the Portfolio Definition
Portfolio Delivery
Cycle. It is critical that everyone understands its purpose and importance.
Strategy is key
The size and format of the Portfolio Delivery Strategy is irrelevant; the value
Focus on value that it should provide to all stakeholders is not.
Management Board must agree and fully commit to the Portfolio Delivery
Management Board
Strategy.
endorsement
The Portfolio Office should lead on the creation of the Portfolio Delivery
Portfolio Office takes Strategy, ensuring that all stakeholders are engaged in its development and
the lead support the recommendations to Management Board.
54
Final Public Consultation Draft
9 10
Criminal Justice Information Technology (CJIT) P3O, MSP and P3M3 Management Control
Approach to Investment Appraisal. Perspective.
55
Final Public Consultation Draft
Defined roles and Ensure that people are aware of their involvement and that the
relationships relationships between the Portfolio Direction Group and Portfolio
Progress Group are understood by everyone.
Visible processes Ensure that key PfM processes are defined and understood. Provide
direct support to people and help them work through new processes.
Particularly important is the Business Change Lifecycle and the reporting
process.
Skills and experience Employ people within the Portfolio Office who are experienced, skilled
and good communicators. If they do not have these abilities, they will
have no credibility and the skilled Programme and Project Managers will
not listen to them.
Pragmatic reporting Do not make the reporting process too cumbersome. The only way to
processes make reporting work is to make the Programme and Project Managers
want to report. Therefore, you must make sure they understand that
reporting is a supportive mechanism for them. Clearly identify the
escalation processes for risks and issues, the information flows and
levels where decision will be made.
Manage stakeholders Ensure that a thorough Stakeholder Analysis has taken place and that
people from external groups, the Portfolio team and the teams from
within Business as Usual are engaged with appropriately.
Supportive Provide supportive advice and training to the Programme and Project
advice/training Management Teams where required.
Timeliness and Ensure that Programme and Project information is presented in a timely
accuracy and accurate manner. If the reporting process is not aligned correctly to
the governance structure, the information will be out of date by the time it
is presented to Senior Management.
56
Final Public Consultation Draft
7.3.1 What is the purpose? Benefits Ensure that the Benefits Management
To clearly identify and manage the benefits Management strategy is concise, easy to read and agreed
being realised from the Changes, ensuring that strategy by the Management Board.
they contribute to performance and Strategic
Objectives as defined in the Business Case. Ensure that skilled resources are available to
Skilled undertake the Benefits Management activities
resources and that Business as Usual and Performance
7.3.2 What is involved? Departments are committed to being involved.
A Benefits Management strategy has been Do not measure everything in detail; identify
agreed and clearly defines how the benefits will Do not the important benefits and work with those
contribute to the realisation of the Strategic measure first. It is easy to spend too much time
Objectives and how they will be managed. To everything measuring benefits that have less importance
make this a success, collaborative working with than others.
key stakeholders – particularly performance,
Use simple and creative Benefits Modelling
Strategic Planning and representatives from the
techniques to show the contribution to the
business – is critical, as this will ensure that
Be creative strategy. Do not send the Management Board
benefits are aligned to performance11 and linked
a benefits flow diagram containing 300 boxes
to the Strategic Objectives and the PSA Targets
on one side of A3 paper.
where required.
Ensure that Benefits Realisation Management
Benefits are well documented so it is possible to Ongoing
is viewed as a constant throughout the
understand the flow from each Change and their management
Business Change Lifecycle and not just a
contribution to Strategic Objectives. This of benefits
one-off occurrence at the end.
information is maintained continuously, to reduce
When Changes slip, consider also the impact
the risk of double counting, and is published
Link to on the Benefits Plan, performance and
regularly so that people can maintain an
reporting Strategic Objectives when reporting to the
understanding of progress.
Management Board.
Benefits information is included in the
Every Change in the Portfolio must have a
Management Dashboard and assists with
Business Business Case with clearly defined benefits
decision making, particularly where slippage Cases that can be linked to Strategic Objectives.
occurs as Senior Management will be interested There are no exceptions to this rule.
in the impact on the high-level Benefits Plan and
targets.
Appendix 1a contains a useful model used within
Criminal Justice Information Technology (CJIT) to
represent the relationship between the Portfolio,
benefits and performance.
Important Note: If a Change does not benefit a Strategic Objective, or enable another Change to benefit Strategic
Objectives, it should not be started. Equally, if any existing Change does not align to the Strategic Objectives, it
should be challenged and more than likely stopped. The only exceptions to this rule are ‘must do’ Changes, such as
regulatory and statutory requirements. They may or may not directly add value to the Strategic Objectives, but a
Business Case should still exist and should be included in the prioritisation of the corporate Portfolio.
11
Gartner Report: UK Criminal Justice System Makes
Portfolio Management Key to IT Success.
57
Final Public Consultation Draft
7.4 PfM Practice 8: Financial Management Irrespective of these structures, any organisation
can still align PfM with existing financial processes
and integrate, as a minimum, the following rules.
7.4.1 What is the purpose?
• A Business Change Lifecycle is used
To ensure that the PfM processes and decisions are proactively for all Change.
aligned to the Financial Planning Cycles and that • A Financial Plan must be incorporated within
financial considerations form a key element in all every Business Case.
decisions regarding the commencement and • All new (and proposed) Changes must start
ongoing viability of every Change. via the agreed Business Change Lifecycle.
• Only the Portfolio Direction Group can agree
Important Note: Aligning PfM to financial structures to the inclusion of a new Change in the
can be extremely challenging. It is critical that the Portfolio.
Finance Department are fully consulted on this
alignment. Not only are they experts in the financial
planning process, but they will also have the best Aligning PfM and the organisation’s financial
understanding on decisions currently being made. structures is particularly useful because, if there is
slippage in the Portfolio, the impact of over/under-
spends can be recognised early and managed
7.4.2 What is involved? accordingly.
During the early days of PfM implementation, one of
the key elements is to understand the relationship of
existing processes, governance and decision-
making bodies. A key governance structure that Financial Management: Keys to
will undoubtedly already exist is a Board that Success
makes decisions regarding financial investments
in either Business as Usual and/or individual
Ensure that the Portfolio Office and
Changes.
Involve Finance Department work
The level of difficulty when trying to align PfM to financial collaboratively. Seconding a strategic
the existing structure is completely dependent on experts finance expert into the Portfolio Office
your organisation and where the budgets for can be a significant advantage.
Changes sit. This can vary significantly within
Align Cycles Align Strategic Planning, PfM and
different organisations. Some organisations have
Financial Cycles for optimum value.
a Directorate of Change, which controls the
Business The Business Change Lifecycle
budgets for all strategic Changes, whereas others
Cases ensures that a Business Case and
choose not to differentiate between Business as
Financial Plan exist for every Change.
Usual and Change and each directorate will This is non-negotiable.
receive a lump sum allocation.
Incrementally releasing funds in line
Incremental
In contrast, it could be that the Portfolio is divided with the Business Change Lifecycle
funds release
based on categorisation, and investment criteria can improve financial and Change
may be added to each category, so that for a Planning.
Change to be accepted into a categorised Financial Ensure that a Financial Plan exists for
Portfolio it must provide x amount of return on planning the Portfolio.
investment. Some organisations sit in the middle, Ensure that top-level finance
allocating a budget to the Portfolio Direction information is incorporated into the
Group and releasing the funding based on Financial Management Dashboard. This will
priority, and perhaps in stages based on reporting require financial reporting information
successful progression through the stages of the from all the Changes within the
Business Change Lifecycle. Portfolio.
58
Final Public Consultation Draft
7.5 PfM Practice 9: Risk Management Risk Management works at all levels within the
Portfolio and the Portfolio Office will ensure that
Risk Management is embedded into the Business
7.5.1 What is the purpose? Change Lifecycle, enabling risks to be managed by
the correct people at the right level within the
Effective management of the Portfolio’s exposure to
Portfolio.
risk is crucial to the successful delivery of the
Changes and ultimately to achievement of the A robust Risk Management environment will ensure
Strategic Objectives. Risk Management at the the identification and effective management of
Portfolio level implements standards that are used strategic, delivery and operational risks and
by all Changes and which align to the Corporate opportunities. This requires an effective risk
Risk Management Policy. Risks across the Portfolio escalation process and consistent analysis of risk in
are continually reviewed and an effective escalation terms of probability, impact and timing. Where
process ensures that the relevant risks are reported required, the production and funding of contingency
to Senior Management. plans should exist, with an ongoing review by
knowledgeable experts, risk owners and Senior
Management.
7.5.2 What is involved?
A Risk Management strategy has been agreed at
7.5.3 Maintaining focus on risks
the Portfolio level and clearly defines the amount of
risk that is to be accepted across the Portfolio, how Risk Management is usually the first PfM Practice to
the Risk Management process will work within the suffer in business environments, where things that
Portfolio and how it links to Organisational Risk are happening ‘now’ are viewed as the most
Management. Collaborative working with the important. Table 7.1 provides an overview of how to
Organisational Risk Management Department ensure that Risk Management remains in focus.
ensures compliance with organisational policies and
aligns with Strategic Planning.
Portfolio reporting Ensure that the status of the top Portfolio level risks are incorporated into
the Management Dashboard and that risk actions are regularly updated.
Embed updates into the Portfolio Risk Register in line with reporting
mechanisms. Be creative with graphical representations of overall
Portfolio risk.
Prioritisation process During prioritisation ensure that risk is included as a factor in the
prioritisation criteria. Use of a matrix highlighting risk and benefit is useful
for assessments of new Changes and during reviews.
Organisational Risk Ensure continued alignment with any existing Organisational Risk
Management Management Policy. It is useful for a Portfolio Office member to attend
Organisational Risk Management Board meetings.
Stage Gates in the End-of-stage assessments check that Risk Management products are up
Business Change to date and are being effectively managed.
Lifecycle
59
Final Public Consultation Draft
Risk Management software If the organisation is using an enterprise Project Management software
tool, an automated centralised Risk Management mechanism that informs
owners of their risks can be extremely useful. This will only work in an
environment that proactively values the management of risk.
Risk exposure A key purpose of PfM Risk Management is to oversee the overall level of
exposure. It is rarely a single risk that will cause major problems, but the
combination of a number of risks being realised that requires the attention
of the PfM team.
Incorporate risk into the The management of risk must be a PfM Practice within the Business Change
Business Change Lifecycle. Risks must be owned at the appropriate level and incorporated into
Lifecycle the Portfolio reporting, reviews and prioritisation.
60
Final Public Consultation Draft
7.6 PfM Practice 10: Stakeholder Engagement understanding of the progress and successes.
Communication and engagement is not one-way
traffic from the Portfolio; it is important to ensure that
7.6.1 What is the purpose?
processes facilitate a feedback loop from
The provision of a centralised and co-ordinated stakeholders to the Portfolio. This needs to be
approach to Stakeholder Engagement and managed in such a way that stakeholders can see
Communication ensures that the needs of the what has been implemented based on their
organisation’s customers (internal and external feedback.
stakeholders) are identified and managed
appropriately. Stakeholder support for the Portfolio Stakeholder Engagement: Keys
is achieved by effective consultation and to Success
involvement in relevant decision-making processes
relating to delivery of the Portfolio and achievement Ensure that Organisational
of the Strategic Objectives. Work Communication Teams are
collaboratively involved with the creation of
with Corporate Stakeholder and Communication
7.6.2 What is involved? Communication Plans at Portfolio level.
Team Regional/local support should also
A centrally managed and consistent approach to be provided if possible.
Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Make sure that stakeholder needs
exists at all levels in the Portfolio. The Corporate are understood and that they are
Involve
Communication Team work closely with the involved appropriately in decision-
stakeholders
Portfolio Office during the creation of the making and communication
Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan. processes.
They also provide ongoing advice and support at Align the individual Stakeholder
Align Plans
central and regional/local levels where required. Engagement and Communication
from Changes
Plans for each Change with the
The Portfolio Communication Plan, together with to overall
central Portfolio Communication
the Business Change Lifecycle, ensure that Portfolio Plan
Plan.
stakeholders’ needs are identified, which is Stakeholder Engagement and
achieved by proactively involving stakeholders in Communications is a broad and
the development and decision-making process complex PfM Practice and requires
where required. The Portfolio Communication Plan Sophistication more than simply ‘broadcasting’
identifies all stakeholders, how key messages will of approach information to the wider
be communicated and, while each Change will community. It requires skills and
create and manage its own Communication Plan, it resources to be truly effective.
will need to be aligned with the Portfolio
Communication Plan. Processes must exist that ensure
that stakeholders can visibly see
There is a budget for communications that is Feedback loop how their comments/feedback
agreed as part of the Portfolio Delivery Strategy and have been accepted, reviewed and
is managed by the Portfolio Office. There are implemented.
processes for different types of messages. Communication skills and
However, one of the keys to success is that resources are not often viewed as
Management Board members are visibly involved a priority at the start of
and proactively support various communications to implementing PfM. This is a grave
Value
the Portfolio and the wider organisation. This has mistake, as without effective
communication
proved critical in terms of continually focusing on communication processes and
collaborative working, emphasising the need to be skills, there is a serious risk of mis-
one team and ensuring that people have a common communicating to stakeholders.
61
Final Public Consultation Draft
62
Final Public Consultation Draft
63
Final Public Consultation Draft
64
Final Public Consultation Draft
Appendix 1a: Criminal Justice Information Technology (CJIT) Model
CJIT use this model to represent the relationship between the Portfolio, benefits and performance.
65
Final Public Consultation Draft
The Portfolio Direction Group consists of the Management Board members who are collectively responsible
for ensuring that the Portfolio delivers the Changes and benefits identified within Portfolio Delivery Strategy.
The Portfolio Direction Group should be prepared to make proactive decisions and provide leadership that
energises the teams and the organisation throughout the life of the Portfolio.
Meetings may be attended by a number of additional members where required, including the Portfolio
Management, Senior Business Change or Programme Management Roles.
Responsibilities
• Overall ownership and direction of the Portfolio Delivery Strategy.
• Accountable for ensuring that the Portfolio remains on course to deliver the desired strategic benefits
and outcomes.
• Review the status of the Portfolio regularly via a Management Dashboard.
• Review recommendations from Portfolio Progress Group and make decisions accordingly.
• Ensure that resources are allocated appropriately.
• Ensure that any conflicts between the Portfolio delivery and Business As Usual that cannot be
resolved by the Progress Group are addressed.
• Proactively communicate collaborative working throughout respective departments/units.
• Ensure that Business as Usual and the Portfolio are aligned effectively to deliver the Strategic
Objectives.
66
Final Public Consultation Draft
The Portfolio Progress Group is chaired by the Director of Change Role (and closely supported by the
Portfolio Management and/or Portfolio Office Management Roles).
Meetings attended by various Senior Management from across the organisation, including representatives
from Training, HR, IT, Finance, Commercial, for example. In addition, Business Change Management also
attend to ensure that Business as Usual representation is included in the decision-making process.
Progress Group members are collectively responsible for ensuring that the day-to-day delivery of Changes
remains on track as per the agreed Portfolio Delivery Strategy.
Ensuring that Best Practice processes are achieved in order to understand progress and effectively address
the key Portfolio risks and issues.
Review all proposed new Programmes and Projects and make recommendations to the Portfolio Definition.
Responsibilities
• Own the day-to-day delivery of the Portfolio Delivery Strategy.
• Ensure that all Programmes and Projects comply with agreed delivery standards, e.g. use of the
Business Change Lifecycle.
• Review progress and resolve key Portfolio-level issues.
• Ensure that Portfolio-level risks are identified and managed appropriately.
• Ensure that agreed resources are maintained within the Portfolio.
• Ensure that implementations into Business as Usual are co-ordinated so as not to cause operational
disruption.
• Proactively support the communication of the Portfolio and the Portfolio Delivery Strategy within
relevant departments.
• Make recommendations to Portfolio Direction Group regarding key decisions required. Specifically
including (but not limited to) the start-up or cessation of Programmes or Projects, management of
key risk and issues, and Portfolio communications.
• Review proposals for Changes to the scope of the Portfolio (including Change Control process for
existing Programmes and Projects where required) and make recommendations to Portfolio
Direction Group where required.
67
Final Public Consultation Draft
Responsibilities
• Provide overall direction and leadership for the delivery and implementation of the Portfolio, with
personal responsibility for its success.
• Ensure the creation of an energised working culture that is focused on collaborative working and
teamwork.
• To ensure that Best Practices are utilised within the Portfolio.
• To ensure sound financial management of the Portfolio.
• Secure the investment to implement PfM (including a Portfolio Office).
• Provide strategic challenge, overview and scrutiny, ensuring alignment with wider policy and strategic
initiatives.
• Ensure that evolving business needs and issues are addressed effectively.
68
Final Public Consultation Draft
69
Final Public Consultation Draft
70
Final Public Consultation Draft
Appendix 4: Programme and Project Information 9. Risk level (use of OGC Risk Profile Analysis
Template
(RPA)).
document for all Changes will enable the same 15. Business as Usual area impacted.
information to be captured, which will provide a
16. Resource commitments.
platform to carry out subsequent Portfolio Definition
activities. 17. Initial priority suggestion.
Fitness for purpose checklist 19. Any other information you feel is useful.
2. SRO/Sponsor name.
3. Objectives.
71
Final Public Consultation Draft
What Changes are we Portfolio Delivery Ideally, a graphical top-level view of the
going to make to the Schedule. Portfolio that categorises and prioritises the
organisation and when? Changes. Usually over a period of three to ten
What are the most years.
important Changes?
This enables Senior Management and all
stakeholders to understand the scope,
schedule, key dependencies and the priority
of Changes within the Portfolio.
How will the Changes Categorised Changes, Defines the planned realisation of benefits at
deliver the Strategic Portfolio Benefits and the Portfolio level and the links to
Objectives? Performance Plan performance. Benefits will be grouped and
aligned where possible to prove that the
Strategic Objectives can be achieved.
Which Changes are not Identification of existing Provides clarity to senior decision makers
helping us to realise our or planned Changes regarding the potential opportunity to stop
Strategic Objectives? that do not align with Changes and redirect resources to more
the strategic important Changes that will contribute to the
objectives. Strategic Objectives.
How much risk do we Risk assessment and Clear understanding of the overall risk
take, where are the key management strategy. exposure, the amount of risk that the
areas of risk and what Management Board will accept (risk appetite).
are we doing about Relevant owners assigned to individual risks
them? and management actions agreed and defined.
72
Final Public Consultation Draft
How will the Changes Portfolio Performance Clear links from Business as Usual
impact on performance Strategy. enhancements/Benefits Management
in the short, medium and Strategies to the performance indicators and
long term? Strategic Objectives, enabling Senior
Management to understand performance. In
some cases performance may dip in the short
term during the Changes and therefore Senior
Managers must be aware of and prepared for
this.
What is the organisation Organisational A top-level definition of the future state of the
going to look and feel Blueprint. organisation enabling people to understand
like once we have what the new organisation will look like and
achieved our strategy? the way it will work based on the strategic
objectives and Portfolio of Changes. This is
usually owned by the Organisational Design
or Strategy Department (it has similarities with
an MSP Programme Blueprint but from an
organisation-wide perspective).
How is the Portfolio Portfolio Governance. Clearly defined management structure and
going to be managed as Business Change Lifecycle that aligns
we move forward? existing Organisational Governance meetings
and decision making to PfM and the delivery
of Changes via Programmes and Projects.
What processes are Portfolio Office Vision The Portfolio Office Vision and Blueprint will
going to be put in place? Blueprint. enable stakeholders to understand at a high
level and a process level exactly what to
expect from the Portfolio Office.
73
Final Public Consultation Draft
Appendix 6: Senior Managers Portfolio and that they will enable realisation of the Strategic
Management Briefing Objectives and PSA Targets.
74
Final Public Consultation Draft
The following list gives a snapshot of the often Actual benefit: In fact, it is the opposite. Going
perceived dis-benefits and provides reasons as to through a process to start a Project enables you to
why they are actually important positive benefits to make sure you have the commitment from the rest
you. of the team and that the Project is prioritised with
the benefits of the organisation in mind.
75
Final Public Consultation Draft
76
Final Public Consultation Draft
77
Final Public Consultation Draft
Gated Review
Structured reviews of a Project, Programme or Information Hub
Portfolio as part of formal governance arrangements Refers to the centralised element of the Hub and
that are carried out at key decision points in the Spoke model for P3O in terms of information flows
lifecycle to ensure that the decision to invest as per (see Hub and Spoke, above). Supports highlight and
agreed Business Cases and Plans remains valid. exception based reporting for Projects, Programmes
and/or Portfolios by amalgamating information with
the process and information owned by the central
Governance (Business Change) office as the Information Hub.
Encompasses the structures, accountabilities and
policies, standards and process for decision making
Information Technology Infrastructure Library
within an organisation in order for Business Change
(ITIL®)
to answer the key strategic questions: ‘Are we doing
the right things?’; ‘Are we doing them the right A set of guides on the management and provision of
way?’; ‘Are we getting them done well?’; and ‘Are operational IT services.
we getting the benefits?’
Management Board
Health Check
Generic term used to describe Project Management
A health check is a quality tool that provides a Boards, Programme Management Boards, Portfolio
snapshot of the status of a Project, Programme or Management Boards or any combination of these
Portfolio. The purpose of a health check is to gain based on the P3O context.
an objective assessment of how well the Project,
Programme or Portfolio is performing relative to its
objectives and any relevant processes or standards. Management Dashboard
A health check differs from a Gated Review in that it
A technique to represent vast amounts of decision
is a tool used for assurance purposes by the P3O to
support information at an amalgamated level using
inform specific actions or capability maturity
tabular and graphical representation such as graphs
development plans, whereas a Gated Review is part
and traffic lights.
of formal governance arrangements.
78
Final Public Consultation Draft
79
Final Public Consultation Draft
80
Page left blank intentionally
This is a Crown copyright value
P3M3™ is a Trade Mark of the
added product, reuse of which
Office of Government
requires a Click-use licence for
Commerce.
value added material issued by
OPSI
ITIL® is a Registered Trade
OGC 1 Horse Guards Road, Mark of the Office of
London SW1A 2HQ Government Commerce in the
United Kingdom and other
Service Desk: 0845 000 4999
countries
[email protected]
www.ogc.gov.uk