Criterion 5 Faculty Information and Contributions 200: Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
Criterion 5 Faculty Information and Contributions 200: Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
4.
3.
2.
1.
Sl.NO
CRITERION 5
University
Qualification
Year of attaining
higher qualification
Designation
CAY[2018-19]
Department
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Specialization
Ph.D. Guidance
Faculty Receiving Ph.D.
Research
Academic
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Table.B.5a
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
Sl.NO
University
Qualification
Year of attaining
higher qualification
Designation
CAY[2017-18]
Department
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Specialization
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
Sl.NO
University
Qualification
Year of attaining
higher qualification
Designation
Professor/ Associate
Professor
Department
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Specialization
Association
(Regular /Contract)
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
10
11
12
13
14
15
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
(The above data to be provided considering all the UG and PG programs of the department)
F = Total Number of Faculty Members in the Department (excluding first year faculty)
Table B.5.1
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
5.1.1 Provide the information about the regular and contractual faculty as per the
format mentioned below:
Year Total number of regular faculty in Total number of contractual
the department faculty in the department
CAY[2018-19] -
CAYm1[2017-18] -
CAYm2[2016-17] -
Table B.5.1.1
F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1 Student-
Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1
Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1
Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
Table B.5.6
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
1.
2.
3.
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
1.
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
1.
2.
3.
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
3
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
1.
3.
6.
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
1.
2.
3.
4.
TOTAL
TOATAL MARKS =5
2
Self Assessment Report Department of Mechanical Engineering
Amount
Sl.No Title of the project Period Funding Agency
Generated
Fund generated from
student and Industry
Students Industries
2018-2019
1.
2017-2018
2016-2017
2015-2016
TOTAL
The Institution has a well defined faculty performance appraisal and development
system. Each staff member submits annually in detail capturing all his/her activities in a
prescribed format to head of the department. The head of the department evaluates and
submits to the establishment section for further action. Further, this information would be
submitted to the Principal for necessary recommendations.
Student feedback
Results in the respective subject handled
Additional duties performed in that particular semester
Participation in Training Programs / Faculty Development programs / Workshops
University Examination related work
Publication in conferences and journals
Consultancy work
Involvement in Research work
Execution of funded projects
The Faculty fills the appraisal format and submits with necessary documents to the HOD.
The HOD evaluates and submits to the establishment section for further action.
The establishment section consolidates and submits it to the Principal.
The principal makes recommendations and submit (case to case basis) to the
Governing Council for further actions.
The recommendation would be advising the faculty to participate in faculty development
programs to enhance knowledge, enhance qualifications, organize programs in the college,
and submit project proposals to funding agencies.