Direct Chill Casting of Al Alloys PDF
Direct Chill Casting of Al Alloys PDF
Direct Chill Casting of Al Alloys PDF
Christopher J. Vreeman
Capstone Turbine Corporation,
21211 Nordhoff Street,
Alloys: Modeling and Experiments
Chatsworth, CA 91311
J. David Schloz
on Industrial Scale Ingots
Wagstaff Engineering, A continuum mixture model of the direct chill casting process is compared to experimental
3910 North Flora Road, results from industrial scale aluminum billets. The model, which includes the transport of
Spokane, WA 99216 free-floating solid particles, can simulate the effect of a grain refiner on macrosegregation
and fluid flow. It is applied to an Al-6 wt% Cu alloy and the effect of grain refiner on
Matthew John M. Krane macrosegregation, sump profile, and temperature fields are presented. Two 45 cm diam-
Member, ASME eter billets were cast under production conditions with and without grain refiner. Tem-
Assistant Professor perature and composition measurements and sump profiles are compared to the numerical
School of Materials Engineering, results. The comparison shows some agreement for the grain refined case. It is believed
Purdue University, that an incorrect assumption about the actual grain structure prevents good agreement in
West Lafayette, IN 47907 the non-grain refined billet. 关DOI: 10.1115/1.1482089兴
Journal of Heat Transfer Copyright © 2002 by ASME OCTOBER 2002, Vol. 124 Õ 947
steady state numerical solutions with free-floating dendrites discussion of the numerical techniques used is found in 关22兴. The
(g s, p ⬎0) were unsuccessful because of the unstable nature of the solution was carried out as described further in 关11兴, with the
interaction of the fluid flow and the solid in the region of g s,p 共see exception of the thermal boundary condition. Instead of using the
关11兴 for details兲. As the simulations proceeded forward in time, a correlations found in 关11兴, the temperature of the surface of the
quasi-steady state was reached where transient variations in the billet was determined by the measurements described below.
dependent variables reached a minimum range.
The numerical solution of the conservation equations 共Table 1兲
is implemented through the use of a control volume formulation Experimental Methods
and the SIMPLER algorithm 关21兴. The procedures outlined by To understand the behavior of these billets during an actual
Bennon and Incropera 关20兴 are used with upwind differencing to casting process and to evaluate the performance of Vreeman’s
discretize all terms. Modifications are made to the differencing model, two 0.45 m 共18 in兲 diameter Al-6wt%Cu billets were cast
procedure of the so-called advection-like source terms in the spe- at Wagstaff’s foundry in Spokane, Washington, using the Wagstaff
cies equation. For these terms, the discretization procedure was Airslip™ process 共see Fig. 1共b兲兲. The alloy was induction melted
modified to insure that mass is conserved when both solid and and degassed with 100 percent argon, then transferred from the
liquid simultaneously cross control volume interfaces. A complete tilting furnace via a heated refractory trough to the mold table.
colder liquid rushing underneath it, but most of the heat extracted
from the ingot is taken from regions closer to the surface. The
effect of this region is seen in the temperature contours in Fig.
3共b兲. Some correspondence can be found between the end of the
shallow gradients in Fig. 3共a兲 and the predicted beginning of the
rigid mushy zone where the fluid quickly assumes the casting
speed. Both Figs. 2 and 3共a兲 present some evidence for double-
diffusive flow cells in the sump, each with relatively uniform
composition and temperature.
An etched macrograph of the grain refined billet is compared to
predictions in Fig. 4. In Fig. 4共a兲, lines representing the solidus
interface (g S ⫽1.0) and the transition between the rigid, packed
Fig. 3 Results with grain refiner: „a… Comparison of predicted solid and the slurry (g S ⫽g S, P ) are seen. These lines are repro-
and measured temperature profiles, and „b… Calculated tem-
duced in Fig. 4共b兲 and compared to calculations. The total sump
perature and fraction solid contours.
depth is only overpredicted by approximately 5 percent, while the
actual rigid mushy zone thickness at the surface is twice the cal-
culated value near the surface. The general shape of the sump is
from where they form 共near the outer radius兲 to where they finally correct, but the profiles are steeper near the center and shallower
join the rigid mushy zone 共closer to the centerline兲 results in a near the surface than predicted. This result suggests that the rigid
region in the center which is deficient in copper. mushy zone is thicker than predicted and, given the agreements in
A comparison of vertical temperature profiles for experiments the temperature profiles, perhaps the packing fraction is slightly
and simulations is found in Fig. 3共a兲. At all three radial positions, lower than assumed (g S ⫽0.20⫺0.25?). Near the surface, it is
the temperature decreases in the melt due to conduction towards possible that the packing fraction was even lower, due to the more
the chill until the liquidus temperature is reached. At that point, horizontal surface, which would slow the flow and allow more
solid begins to nucleate on the grain refiner and a solid-liquid time for particles to settle.
slurry forms. Near the surface, the large heat extraction rate so- The radial composition profile is shown in Fig. 5. Near the
lidifies the alloy fast enough that the particles pack quickly and a centerline, the measured composition was up to 10 percent below
rigid structure forms. The other two profiles behave somewhat the nominal value for the alloy, while numerical results predicted
differently, with a sudden shallowing of the temperature gradient less than half that level of segregation there. The study of the
around the liquidus temperature. This shallow gradient begins at effect of packing fraction on centerline segregation found in 关11兴
roughly 0.06 m from the inlet and continues to approximately 0.12 suggests that this lower composition at the centerline could be an
m and 0.22 m for the midradius and centerline profiles, respec- indication that the actual packing fraction was picked to be too
tively. At those points the temperature gradient became markedly low a value. However, the results for the sump temperature pro-
steeper. The reason for this behavior is found in the flow patterns files discussed above suggest otherwise. The calculated values in-
described above. The liquid metal is chilled by the impinging jets creased as the radius increased until a peak was reached around
and much of the metal runs down the interface at which the solid r⫽0.15 m. The experiments also increased, but reached a plateau
packs until it is entrained into the rigid mushy zone. This flow around r⫽0.07 m. Figure 4 shows that the observed sump profiles
pattern leaves a triangular zone of weak recirculation in the center are less steep than in the simulation near the billet surface, sug-
of the sump around which most of the fluid flows. This ‘‘dead gesting a greater tendency for solid particles to settle there than
zone’’ does contain some solid particles, as it is cooled by the was predicted. As the radius decreased, the situation was reversed
共predicted sump profiles were less steep than in the real billet兲, so
copper-depleted particles are more likely to end up at the bottom
of the sump at the centerline. It was noted above that the diameter would be about 0.1 wt percent in Fig. 5, which would not account
of the free-floating solid particles was assumed to be fixed at 75 for the discrepancy between the predictions and the measure-
m, which was picked based on typical grain sizes in the actual ments. It should also be noted that there are some measured com-
ingot. Using only this average leads to some uncertainty in the
position variations at given radial positions. These data, taken at
results. It should be noted that, in Vreeman and Incropera 关11兴, the
different axial locations, show that the composition did vary along
difference in the level of centerline macrosegregation with a varia-
tion of diameter between 25 and 100 m was found to be approxi- the axis of the billet and call into question the assumption that this
mately 2 percent of the nominal composition. Such a difference process truly reaches a steady-state in the flow and composition
fields.
To understand how well the model simulates the transport phe-
nomena in a non-grain refined process, another numerical case
was run with g S, P ⫽0.0, simulating purely columnar growth. The
results were compared to experimental data from a billet cast in
the same manner as above except the absence of grain refiner.
Figure 6 shows the predicted composition field and streamline and
fraction solid profiles. With g S, P ⫽0.0, the model assumes that all
of the solid is rigid and moving at the casting velocity. The flow
from the inlet to the chill is similar to the previous case, but,
because of the much lower packing fraction, the temperature of
the flow moving down along the interface of rigid mushy zone is
much higher 共above the liquidus temperature兲 than in the grain
refined case. Also, with no Cu depleted solid being swept down
towards the centerline by the buoyancy driven flow, only Cu en-
riched liquid reaches the center. This effect accounts for the pre-
dicted positive segregation at the centerline.
While the grain refined case showed very good agreement be-
tween experiments and modeling, the case with no grain refiner
did not. The radial composition profile in Fig. 7 shows a marked
difference between predicted and measured macrosegregation.
While the predictions suggested a steady increase in composition
as the radius becomes smaller, the experiments show a pattern
more reminiscent of the profile in the presence of grain refiner
共except at the centerline, where there is an increase in copper
content兲. It is well known that the grain structure of these types of
large billets undergo a columnar to equiaxed transition around the
midradius. This change could be brought about by a slurry of solid
particles in the sump generated by fragmentation of the columnar
dendrites. This mechanism of particle generation would produce a
much smaller slurry region and a much lower packing fraction
than the grain refined billet. However, the assumption that all the
solid is rigid and moves at the casting speed is not valid in the
presence of such a particle cloud. At this point, attributing the
Fig. 6 Mixture copper composition, streamlines, and solid discrepancy between the measured and predicted macrosegrega-
fraction for billet with no grain refiner, using experimental tion to a columnar to equiaxed transition is speculative and more
boundary conditions data are needed to confirm this conclusion.