JACK CAMPBELL ‘sete Fama SEG 2500
STATE ATTORNEY
July 30,2019
Dear Law Enforcement Partners,
| have just returned from our annual Florida Prosecuting Attorney's Summer Conference
where our boatd discussed many significant issues. One of the most pressing is tha of Florida's
new hemp law and how it impacts other prosecutions. ‘This leter does NOT address medical
marijuana, Tagree thatthe issues often interelate, but for the sake of elarity [only addres the
hemp issue here
‘Both Congress and the Florida Legislature have now passed laws making hemp, CBD, and
other derivatives with 3 percent or less of THC, lawful. The specific definition is: “Hemp” means
the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof, and all
derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers thereof, whether
growing oF not, tht has 2 total delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration that does not exceed
(0.3 percent on a dry-weight basis." Florida Statute §S81.217 (2019),
Previously, 1 was present at a meeting and demonstration at the Florida Department of
Agriculture on July 8, 2019 where a vendor, a Navy Seal, showed a possible presumptive test that
‘would be able o differentiate these items. They stated they were working with AVO labs and the
[Broward State Attomey’s Office to validate the est. T mentioned thatthe tests were of no use
unless they were validated and that we would need expert testimony to be able to establish their
scientific reliability in court,
‘AL the conference, I met with the Broward State Attorney's team and am sory to report
that that they were hoping that AVO was going to be able to both validate and provide the expert
testimony necessary. However, they have withdrawn after it was discovered they did not have @
DEA license allowing them 9 even possess marijuana let alone test it, Hence, I would not
recommend you invest in those tests. The eurent status is that we are hoping to get a presumptive
‘est chat will work in Florida, but we don’t have it yet. We resommend keoping Your current
presumptive tests though as they wil likely be needed even when the new additional presumpive
testi retained.
In addition to presumptive or roadside tests, we also will ned full testing for tral, The
Attomey General’s Chief of Staff and General Counsel have explained the FDLE is currently
looking at two possible courses to allow quantification testing of samples, Previously, we would
need only qualitative testing as all forms of the cannabis plants were illegal. Now, cannabis and
its extracts or derivatives ae legal iit has THC concentations below 3%‘The current posture is tht no public or private lab in Florida can do this dispositive testing.
‘The Florida Department of Agriculture is unable to do so, and while there ate some private labs
that may want to get this business, they are not online as of now, The traditional testimony of
officer's training and experience is of no use. These legal products will tet positive for THC with
‘he current presumptive test kits in use, The drug sniffing Ks that have been trained on marijuana
will ikely alert to these products, s they ae rained to detect any amountof THC. Hemp products
Took and smell exactly like marijuana products
‘Some municipal labs in larger jurisdictions ae also trying 1 invest in technology that will
cither allow fll or partial quantification. If FDLE does so, or your agency is willing to have the
samples privately tested, we will consider filing these cases, I would suggest that if you are
contemplating using a non-governmental lab to do your testing, please conrult with ws, ‘The cost
of testing may be far less than what it will cost for us to secure the exper testimony necessary 10
‘comply with Florida evidence rules. Furthermore, the lab you are using may not be capable of
‘meeting the Daubert predicate, and if so, the evidence will be excluded. Daubert v, Merrell Dow
Pharm. Ine., $09 US. $79, $85, 113 8. C1, 2786, 2792, 125 L. Ed. 2d 469 (1993)
My current hope is thatthe Florida Legislature, Florida Department of Agriculture, and the
Florida Department of Law Enforcemtent will work to resolve this problem. Iti clear that cannabis
is stil illegal, and T intend to enforce the laws as written. While this has created a practical
frustration it doesnot appear tobe insurmountable,
Of greater concerms, are the associated issues we will face due to this status. Much ofthe
search and seizure law hinges on cither the officer's or K-9°s ability to smell. This seems to now
be in significant doubt. I would suggest that your officers and deputies no longer rely purely on
their identification of believed cannabis. While it used to allow further detentions and seizures,
‘ease law ftom other jurisdictions suggest it will not be sufficient in the coming months and years.
Finally, pethaps the most egregious oversiteis that of juvenile law. At present, there is no
additional restrietion on children possessing CBD or Hemp. It is my understanding that some
shops are now making pre-olled hemp cigarettes and are selling hemap gummies, ‘The irony that
children cannot lawfully possess tobacco ut ean now have hemp candies and cigarettes is
astounding. I again hope thatthe Florida Legislature will addres this problem,
‘To conclude, this Office will no longer be charging people with possession of cannabis
absent @ confession to what the substance is or testing by a lab that can meet the evidentiary
standards I have laid out. We will also not be approving search warrants or other legal process
based on traditional predicates where officers, or their dogs and presumptive tests, fel a substance
is cannabis. I know this is significant change in the law and would caution you in making arests
‘when these issues are present,
‘Lam confident we ean work through these challenges together as we have inthe past. We
will be lobbying the legislature to fund presumptive testing and final analytical testing, and to
regulate possession by minors. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns,