Assessment Aims and Objectives For Physics International Baccalaureate Diplomat Program

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Assessment Aims and Objectives for Physics International Baccalaureate Diplomat Program

Subject Overview Assessment Objective Internal assessment task and External Assessment tasks
approach
 Available at standard (SL) It is the intention of this The internal assessment, worth The Standard Level (SL) and
and higher levels (HL) course that students are able to 20% of the final assessment, Higher Level (HL) have 80%
 The minimum prescribed fulfill the consists of one scientific externally assessed. The
number of hours is 150 for following assessment investigation. The individual external assessment of Physics
SL and 240 for HL objectives: investigation should cover a topic consists of three written
 Students are assessed both 1. Demonstrate knowledge that is commensurate with the level papers.
externally and internally and understanding of: of the course of study.
 Physics students at SL and • facts, concepts, and In paper 1 there are 30 (at SL)
HL undertake a common terminology Student work is internally assessed or 40 (at HL) multiple-choice
core syllabus and a • methodologies and by the teacher and externally questions. For SL and HL
common internal techniques moderated by the IB. The Paper 1 has 10% of the paper
assessment (IA) scheme. • communicating scientific performance in internal assessment covering objectives 1 and 2
 While there are core skills information. at both SL and HL is marked and 10% of the paper covering
and activities common to 2. Apply: against common assessment objective 3. The overall
both SL and HL, students • facts, concepts, and criteria, with a total mark out of weighting of paper 1 for both
at HL are required to study terminology 24. SL and HL is 20%.
some topics in greater • methodologies and
depth, to study additional techniques The new assessment model uses Paper 2 contains short-answer
topics and to study • methods of communicating five criteria to assess the final and extended-response
extension material of a scientific information. report of the individual questions on the core (and
more demanding nature in 3. Formulate, analyze and investigation with the following Additional Higher Level
the options. The evaluate: raw marks and weightings material at HL). For SL Paper
distinction between SL • hypotheses, research assigned: 2 has 20% of the paper
and HL is one of breadth questions and predictions covering objectives 1 and 2
and depth. • methodologies and and 20% of the paper covering
 A practical approach to the techniques objective 3 giving an overall
course delivery is • primary and secondary data Criteria Weight weighting of 40% for paper
emphasized through the • scientific explanations. Personal 2 (8%) 2. For HL Paper 2 has 18% of
interdisciplinary group 4 4. Demonstrate the engagement the paper covering objectives
project and a mixture of appropriate research,
both short-term and long- experimental, and personal Exploration 6 (25%) 1 and 2 and 18% of the paper
term experiments and skills necessary to carry out Analysis 6 (25%) covering objective 3 giving an
investigations. insightful and ethical Evaluation 6 (25%) overall weighting of 36% for
 Internal assessment investigations Communication 4 (17%) paper 2.
accounts for 20% of the Total 24 (100%)
final assessment and this is Paper 3 has two sections;
assessed through a single Section A contains one data-
individual investigation. based question and several
This investigation may short-answer questions on
involve a hands-on experimental work on the core
approach, use of data- (and AHL material at
bases, modeling, HL). Section B contains
simulation or a hybrid. short-answer and extended-
Student work is internally response questions from each
assessed by the teacher of the four options. For SL
and externally moderated Paper 3 has 10% of the paper
by the IB. covering objectives 1 and 2
and 10% of the paper covering
objective 3 giving an overall
weighting of 20% for paper
3. For HL Paper 3 has 12% of
the paper covering objectives
1 and 2 and 12% of the paper
covering objective 3 giving an
overall weighting of 24% for
paper 3.

You might also like