Quitoriano V Jebsen
Quitoriano V Jebsen
Quitoriano V Jebsen
Facts: The LA dismissed the complaint as it found that petitioner has already
recovered from illness. On appeal, the NLRC affirmed the LA decision but
Respondent Jebsens Maritime, Inc. (represented by Ma. Theresa Gutay), ordered respondents to allow petitioner to resume sea duty. Petitioner filed
hired petitioner Quitoriano as 2nd Officer aboard the vessel M/V Trimnes for a certiorari petition before the CA but the CA denied the same and its
a period of six months with a basic monthly salary of US$936. On May 23, subsequent motion for reconsideration. Hence, this petition.
2001, petitioner, who was assigned as navigating officer from 12:00 midnight Issues:
to 4:00 a.m. and port watcher from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m., complained
of dizziness with severe headache, general body weakness, chest pains, 1. (Main issue) Is petitioner entitled to disability benefits? (YES)
easy fatigability, weak grip strength, and numbness on the left side of his
body and was observed to be dragging his left foot, his mouth slightly down
to one side, and his speech slurred. Ruling:
Yes. Petitioner is entitled to the disability benefits.
When the vessel berthed on May 26, 2001 at Port Huelva, Spain, petitioner
was brought to a hospital where he was diagnosed as suffering from A total disability does not require that the employee be absolutely disabled
hypertension arterial or mild stroke.Since his health condition did not or totally paralyzed. What is necessary is that the injury must be such that
improve, petitioner was repatriated to the Philippines on May 30,2001to the employee cannot pursue his usual work and earn therefrom.
undergo further medical examination and treatment.
In accordance with the avowed policy of the State to give maximum aid and
Upon arrival in Manila, petitioner underwent several tests at the Medical full protection to labor, the Court has applied the Labor Code concept of
Center Manila under the care of Dr. Nicomedes G. Cruz (Dr. Cruz), the permanent total disability to Filipino seafarers,it holding that the notion of
company-designated physician. On November 16, 2001or 169 days after disability is intimately related to the workers capacity to earn, what is
petitioners repatriation, Dr. Cruz issued a medical report declaring him compensated being not his injury or illness but his inability to work resulting
fittowork. in the impairment of his earning capacity; hence, disability should be
understood less on its medical significance but more on the loss of earning
capacity.
Permanent disability is inability of a worker to perform his job for more than
120 days, regardless of whether or not he loses the use of any part of his
body.
The "fit to work" certification was issued by Dr. Cruz or more than five months
from the time petitioner was medically repatriated on May 30, 2001, thus,
petitioner's disability is considered permanent and total.