A Comparative Study of The Different Costing Techniques and Their Application
A Comparative Study of The Different Costing Techniques and Their Application
A Comparative Study of The Different Costing Techniques and Their Application
A comparative Abstract
study of the After its induction in the 19th century, the
pharmaceutical industry covered a long way and now it
became one of the most successful and influential
Muhammad ALEEM,
University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan,
E-mail: [email protected]
To cite this article:
Alamdar Hussain KHAN, Aleem, M., Khan, M.H. and Hamad, W. (2016), A comparative
University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan study of the different costing techniques and their application in
the pharmaceutical companies, Audit Financiar, vol. XIV,
Wasim HAMAD, no. 11(143)/2016, pp. 1253-1263, DOI:
University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan 10.20869/AUDITF/2016/143/1253
To link to this article:
.
http://dx.doi.org/10.20869/AUDITF/2016/143/1253
3. Identify the problems regarding the existing costing The main costing systems can be categorized based on
systems; the product process and the production processes as
4. Assess how indirect costs are charged to the follows (Kaplan, 1984; Cooper and Kaplan, 1988).
product. Product cost. The costing methods concerned with
product costing are:
1. Literature review · Variable/marginal/direct costing;
(i) Fixed cost of manufacturing is also recovered; (vi) Variable costing provides a better prediction of the
(ii) Total cost is recognized; profit, because there is no subjective allocation of
fixed cost.
(iii) It is useful for pricing decisions and perdition of
Gupta and Parmar (2001) argue that marginal costing
profitability; approach should also be conceded along with the
(iv) It is used for external purposes. absorption costing because it represents an effective
In the variable costing, only that part of the cost is way to control the cost. They also state that with the help
considered in the product which varies with the level of of marginal costing we can also observe those
activity. It consists of direct material, direct labour and resources which are unproductive because the attention
is invited to the fixed cost in the marginal costing.
the variable manufacturing overhead cost. Fixed cost is
not considered a part of the product cost in variable Pong and Mitchell (2005) argue that different methods of
costing. The fixed manufacturing cost becomes a part of costing provide different net profits, because of
the period cost, like the administrative and selling differences in the value of stocks. The effect on the profit
expenses, thus in the variable costing the inventory and also depends on the opening and closing stock. If the
cost of goods sold does not consist of any fixed cost of value of the opening and the closing stock is the same,
production. Variable costing has a number of then the profit is the same under marginal and
absorption costing, and if there is no opening and
advantages (Garrison, Noreen and Brewer, 2004):
closing stock, then there is also no difference in the
(i) Data can be taken directly from the variable costing marginal and absorption costing profit. How much profit
for Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) analysis; however, in is different in both costing techniques is depending on
absorption costing it is not easily available; the following two things:
(ii) Profit is not affected by the change in inventories; · The difference between the absorption and the
(iii) The manager often assumes that the per unit cost is variable cost per unit (level of fixed cost per unit).
the variable cost, but in absorption costing both fixed · The value of the ending and the opening inventory.
and variable costs are treated in per unit cost; Table 1 provides the potential effect of both costing
(iv) In the variable costing, the fixed cost is clearly shown methods on the profit. No method has a complete
in the income statement; in this way we can negative or positive effect on the profit. If we change the
emphasize fixed costs to become truly profitable; costing method, the profit can increase or decrease
depending on the stock adjustment (Pong and Mitchell,
(v) Variable cost profit is close to the net cash flows; 2005).
A new costing system emerged from the last decade, i.e. department of factory. It is used for the development of
the ABC system. The early concept of this system cost estimation when the project can be divided into
emerged in the sixties and seventies in the USA quantifiable activities, discrete or a work unit (Cooper
(McConville, 1993) by the General electric company, and Kaplan, 1988; Innes, Mitchell, and Sinclair, 2000). It
and in Germany by the Schlafhorst and Siemens means that this activity can be clearly implemented
(Ziegler, 1992; Wäscher, 1987). However, a theoretically when productivity can be measured in units.
structured and comprehensive system of ABC was For further clarification between ABC and traditional
introduced for the first time in the ‘1980 (Kaplan and costing system we can differentiate between these two
Bruns, 1987). In this technique, we established the as presented in Table 2 (Karadað, Samli, and Öztürk,
different activities or the development of activities which 2009):
show the small group of homogenous tasks in all the
According to Garrison, Noreen and Brewer (2004), the language because the target population consists of well-
following are the limitations of the ABC costing. educated people, so they can easily understand an
international language. There was a total number of 15
· To implement the ABC system there is need of more questions in the questionnaire; it took 5-7 minutes for the
resources, hence it is more costly than traditional respondents to complete the questionnaire. Our sample
costing. size was of 130 managers/accountants of the
· The ABC system provides the numbers e.g. product pharmaceutical companies which are working in the
margins and it odds with the numbers produced in Punjab. 130 questionnaires were distributed to the
the traditional costing. The managers are used to respondents in the month of December 2011. A simple
employ traditional costing to run business operations random sampling technique was used for distribution of
and traditional costing is frequently used the questionnaires. The data were collected through
for performance evaluations. personally administrated questionnaires. Out of 130
questionnaires 96 were received back. The response
· The data based on the ABC costing can easily be rate was 74%. The descriptive and graphical analysis
misinterpreted for making decisions, therefore the were used for the statistical analysis. The questionnaire
manager has to care full for making decisions based was already used by the other researchers, so there is
on the ABC costing, by considering which cost is no issue of reliability. A covering letter is also forwarded
relevant or irrelevant. to the respondents regarding the importance of the
· The ABC method is also not conforming to the study. The most important purposes of the current
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), survey are presented below:
therefore the organization has to prepare the 1. What costing system was used and adopted by the
statement on the basis of two methods: one for pharmaceutical companies in Punjab?
external and one for internal purposes.
2. Do the pharmaceutical companies have a position
for the cost accountant/ manager/accountant for
2. Research methodology costing?
The study was conducted on the pharmaceutical 3. On what basis is the overhead charged to production
companies of Punjab, Pakistan. The questionnaire was in the pharmaceutical firms?
used for the data collection from the pharmaceutical 4. Do the pharmaceutical companies have standards
companies. In this study the questionnaire of Hatzis et for costing?
al. (2011) was used for the data collection, after making 5. Do the companies use the accounting software
the necessary amendments to adapt to the Pakistani package that supports the process of costing?
culture. The questionnaire was designed in the English
Demographics are not the part of analysis in the current age groups are included in our sample. It is also clear
study. It is just included in the paper to disclose the that most respondents hold a master degree and are
composition of the participants/respondents. Table 3 also experienced in the pharmaceutical sector. The
shows the gender discrimination The male respondents different age group, both type genders, low to high
are 88% and female are only 12%. Males are qualification personal and experienced respondents
dominating in Pakistani society. The reason of the low show that the data is the true representation of the
participation of women in manufacturing is that in population involved in the costing activities in the
Pakistani culture the males are supposed to earn pharmaceutical sector.
money, and women are supposed to look after the home
affairs and not earn money themselves. However, this
trend is changing with the passage of time and females 3. Costing systems
are also getting education and joining the public and Table 4 shows the outcomes of the analysis regarding
private sector. However, the 12% participation of the costing system in the pharmaceutical sector, which
females is very low as compared to USA or any Western is the main objective of this survey. Table 4 indicates
country (Bashir and Khattak, 2008). that the majority of the pharmaceutical sector is currently
The majority of the respondents are in the age of 25-30, using the marginal costing system for the cost
which shows that young people are involved in the estimation, which is very important for the internal
pharmaceutical sector; however, Table 3 shows that all costing. The ABC system is used in very few firms due
to its complexity. 35 out of the 96 respondents use the
absorption costing (37%), 47 respondents (49%) use system, meaning 15% approximately.
marginal costing, and 14 firms are using the ABC
Indirect costs the direct labour cost, as per the survey results, because
this is a major cost element. The following graph shows
The manufacturing cost is charged on a different basis in
that most of the pharmaceutical firms use the direct
each sector. The basis of absorbed manufacturing
labour cost as a basis for manufacturing overhead; the
overhead may be the direct labour hours, direct labour
machine hours and direct material are used by some
cost, machine hours, material cost, prime cost and
firms only.
conversion cost, etc. However, in the pharmaceutical
sector the manufacturing cost is charged on the basis of
Most of the pharmaceutical companies have the position · Delays in the gaining of accurate costing information.
of cost accounting manager, who manages the The most important problem which the pharmaceutical
organization’s costing system . 66% of the companies companies face in terms of the costing system is the
have the position of the accounting manager and 34% of incorrect allocation of indirect costs, according to the
the organizations have no proper set up of accounting managers’ answers to the questions in the survey. 54
manager and the costing system is managed by other respondents argue that the major problem is the
categories of employees. incorrect allocation of indirect costs, 20 respondents are
of the view that the delay in gaining the accurate costing
information is the major problem and 23 respondents are
Accounting software of the view that the main problem in costing consists in
In the current era of technology, most organizations use the complexities in the raw data assembly process. The
the accounting software for keeping the accounting following table shows the managers’ responses
records. 74% of the pharmaceutical companies use a regarding the problems faced by the pharmaceutical
cost accounting software for the costing system, while sector.
Satisfaction level are using, 30% are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
and 10% are not satisfied with the system. It is also
The other major objective of the survey is to observe
observed that the firms which are using the ABC
the satisfaction level of the respondents regarding
system are most satisfied as compared to those
the costing systems which they are using in the
firms who are using the marginal and absorption
pharmaceutical sector. Managers may be satisfied
costing, however the following graph shows the level
with the costing system, or dissatisfied, or neither
of the respondents’ satisfaction, neutral position and
satisfied nor dissatisfied. The results show that 60%
dissatisfaction.
of respondents are satisfied with the system that they
Figure 2. The level of respondents’ satisfaction with regard to the costing method they use
Decision Making the marginal costing is better, 10% opted for the
absorption costing and 28% stated that the ABC
The last and most important objective of the research system is best suited for decision making. The
was to show which costing system is better for decision following graph shows the managers’ responses
making. Most managers argue that the marginal regarding the best suited costing system for decision
costing is better for decision making, as compared to making.
absorption costing and ABC costing. 59% argue that
REFERENCES
1. Bashir, S. and Khattak, H.R. (2008), Impact of 7. Kaplan, R.S. (1984), The evolution of management
selected HR practices on perceived employee accounting, The Accounting Review, vol. 59, no. 3,
performance, a study of Public Sector Employees pp. 390-418.
in Pakistan, European Journal of Social Sciences,
vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 243-252. 8. Kaplan, R.S. and Bruns, W. (1987), Accounting
and Management. A Field Study Perspective,
2. Pong, C. and Mitchell, F. (2005), Full costing Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
versus variable costing: Does the choice still
matter? An empirical exploration of UK 9. Karadað, I., Samli, P. and Öztürk, N., (2009), Using
manufacturing companies 1988–2002, The British linear programming to compare direct and
Accounting Review, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 131–148, absorption costing, Main report submitted to The
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2005.09.003. Department of Industrial Engineering of Çankaya
3. Cooper, R. and Kaplan, R.S. (1988), Measure University in partial fulfillment of the requirement
costs right: make the right decisions, Harvard for IE 456 Mathematical Modeling and Applications
Business Review, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 96-103. course, [online] Available at:
http://pdfsr.com/pdf/using-linear-programming-to-
4. Garrison, R., Noreen, E. and Brewer P. (2004), compare-direct-and-absorption-costing, [Accessed
Managerial Accounting, 12th Edition, New York:
on September 12, 2016].
McGraw-Hill.
5. Hatzis, A., Koulidou, A. and Folinas, D. (2011), 10. Gupta, P.K. and Parmar, N.K. (2001), Costing a
Costing logistics services, Operations and supply hospital service product: Marginal vs absorption
chain management: An International Journal, vol. costing, Medical Journal Armed Forces India, vol.
4, no. 2/3, pp. 116-122. 57, no. 3, pp. 230-233, DOI: 10.1016/S0377-
1237(01)80050-2.
6. Innes, J., Mitchell, F. and Sinclair, D. (2000),
Activity-based costing in the UK’s largest 11. Masood, I., Ibrahim MIM, Hassali M.A. and Ahmed,
companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey M. (2009), Evolution of marketing techniques,
results, Management Accounting Research, vol. adoption in pharmaceutical industry and related
11, no. 3, pp.349-362, DOI: issues: A review, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic
10.1006/mare.2000.0135. Research, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1942-1952, [online]
Available at: http://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/609/ 16. Mehmood, T., Salaria, M. R., Herani, G.M. and
744%20.pdf, [Accessed on September 12, 2016]. Qureshi, M.A. (2009), Role of quality management
12. McConville, D.J. (1993), Start with ABC, Industry in pharmaceutical development: Evidence from
Week, vol. 242, no. 17, pp. 33-35. Islamabad and Lahore, Indus Journal of
13. Mushtaq, R. and Chattha, J.A. (2008), Cleaner Management & Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp.
production options in pharmaceutical sector of 21-30.
Pakistan, [online] Available at: http://cstm.cnki.net/ 17. Triest, S. van and Elshahat, M.F. (2007), The use
stmt/TitleBrowse/KnowledgeNet/ZGKL20050900138 of costing information in Egypt: A research note,
0?db=STMI8515, [Accessed on October 12, 2016]. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change,
14. Özbayrak, M., Akgün, M. and Türker, A.K. (2004), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 329 – 343, DOI:
Activity-based cost estimation in a push/pull 10.1108/18325910710820328.
advanced manufacturing system, International 18. Wäscher, D. (1987), Gemeinkosten-Management
Journal of Production Economics, vol. 87, no. 1, im Material- und Logistik-Bereich, ZfB, vol. 57, no.
pp. 49-65, DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00067-7. 3, pp. 297-315.
15. Parnell, J.A. and Hatem, T. (1999), Cultural 19. Ziegler, H. (1992), Prozeßorientierte
antecedents of behavioral differences between
Kostenrechnung im Hause Siemens,
American and Egyptian managers, Journal of
Management Studies, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 399-418, Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, vol.
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00142. 42, no. 4, pp. 304-318.