Reinforced Concrete Structures II-2016 - Chapter 2
Reinforced Concrete Structures II-2016 - Chapter 2
Reinforced Concrete Structures II-2016 - Chapter 2
Reinforced Concrete
Structures 2
(CEng-3122)
Chapter Two 1
One-way Slab Systems
1. Introduction
2. Analysis and Design of One-way Slab Presentation
systems
3. Analysis and Design of One-way Ribbed
Outline
Slab systems
Content
But for fire resistance the minimum dimension and cover requirements are given in EN
1992-1-2:2004 table 5.8.
13
Main-rib section
Plan-Layout (precast
rib slab system)
Section of the
precast ribs and
blocks with the
toping. (low-cost
housing projects)
Addis Ababa institute of Technology
1. Shear forces and moments (Analysis): Shear forces and moments for continuous
rib slabs can be obtained by elastic analysis with due consideration to live load
variation.
2. Design for moment and moment reinforcement: The mid-span section is designed
as a T-beam with flange width equal to the distance between ribs. The support
section is designed as a rectangular beam. The slab may be made solid near the
support to increase shear resistance. Moment reinforcement consisting of one or
more bars is provided in the top and bottom of the ribs. If appropriate, bars can
be curtailed in a similar way to bars in solid slabs
3. Shear resistance and shear reinforcement: the shear verification is carried out for
the critical section of the rib with the same procedure as in a rectangular beam
section. Shear verification should also be carried out for the section between the
flange and the rib.
Friction force
between ribs
and blocks
Total load carried by each rib = load from topping + load from blocks
Ribs
Bracing Beams
Girder Beams
9.506 ∗ 106
22
µ 2
0.0386
11.33 ∗ 400 ∗ 2332
, 0.295
0.055 12.815
0.975 227.175
9.506 ∗ 106 2
160.40
260.87 ∗ 227.175
0.07 16.31 .
0.985 229.505
4.63 ∗ 106 2
77.33
260.87 ∗ 229.505
0.26
233 2.2 300
2
35.54 !
2
∅ 12 113.1 0.6837 ∅
Addis Ababa institute of Technology March 30, 2018
5.2. Design for Support moment at B or C
11.512 ∗ 106
µ 2
0.2339
11.33 ∗ 80 ∗ 2332
0.88
0.295
205.04
23
11.512 ∗ 106 2
215.22
260.87 ∗ 205.04
0.26
233 2.2
300
2
35.54 !
2
∅ 12 113.1 1.9029 ∅
24
, 0.12
1.5
200
1 2.0 233
K=1.92
Z=0.9xd = 209.7
1 80 209.7 0.6 11.33
⟹ , 39.325
2.5 1
2.5
⟹ , …….. , ! March 30, 2018
Addis Ababa institute of Technology
6.1.4. Compute the required shear reinforcement
6.1.6. Provide shear reinforcements (stirrups)
Locatio Scal Sprovid
0.78 ∗ ∗ ∗ span n VEd(KN) (mm) (mm)
ф 6 C/C
2∗ ∗ 62
56.54 2
near A 175 mm
25
4 AB
ф 6 C/C
∗ 0.78 ∗ ∗ ∗ near B -16.34 471 175 mm
ф 6 C/C
near B 13.825 557.44 175 mm
VEd– d from the face of the columns but since the loads are BC
ф 6 C/C
small just take the values at the center of the columns. near C 13.825 557.44 175 mm
ф 6 C/C
‐ since VRd,max>VEd lets take the conservative value near C 16.34 471.64 175 mm
CD
ф 6 C/C
22° 2.5
near D 175 mm
56.54 ∗ 0.78 ∗ 233 ∗ 300 ∗ 2.5 7706.68
Step 7: Design of the Girder and bracing beams
7.1. Design of the Girder Beams
The girder beams are designed for loads transferred from
The stirrup spacing described as a function of the design shear
the ribs as the maximum reaction forces in the analysis of
force for ease of calculation
the ribs.
6.1.5. Minimum shear reinforcement and maximum spacing
For ease of analysis of the Girder Beams the reaction forces
requirement
from the rib analysis are divided by the rib spacing to have a
0.08. uniform load acting over the span.
0.00119
0.75d The bracing beams are designed for their own self weight
and partition load resting directly on them.
Smax = 0.75 *d = 0.75 * 233 = 174.75 → 175mm
Pleas refer the Example 2.3 for more. March 30, 2018
Addis Ababa institute of Technology
Thank you for the kind attention! 26
Questions?