Neighbourhood PDF
Neighbourhood PDF
Neighbourhood PDF
Abstract
This paper is a scholastic attempt to examine the concept of smart neighbourhood. It traces
efforts to define and operationalize the concept of sustainable development in the context of
urban area, observing that these efforts are divided into two broad clusters of work: to find
the parameters to achieve smart neighbourhood and to incorporate policy pathway for
sustainable growth of cities.This paper argues that to be successful, sustainable smart cities
policy must avoid the haphazard development and common conventional policies. In Indian
context it can be said that there is no such smart neighbourhood located here because of lack
of implementation of basic concepts of smart neighbourhoods to build a smart city. A smart
neighbourhood leads to a smart city. For this purpose, a study of the smart neighbourhood in
Bhopal was undertaken. This study reveals the parameters of smart neighbourhood in Indian
context. Finally through the case study, it discusses the scope of sustainable development
through different parameters and policy to achieve smart cities.
INTRODUCTION
Neighbourhoods are one of the basic building blocks of cities, modest size physical units that
make up the residential portion of the urban area and form the environment that we all inhabit
every day. Planning and design at the neighbourhood scale affects our daily lives, determine
what facilities are available locally, how far we need to travel, and much about our
opportunities for interacting with our neighbours. Relatively small design and planning
decisions such as the width and design of streets, the size of blocks, the mix land use and the
location can have huge implication in urban liability and sustainability.
Arnold Whittick in 1974 defined Neighbourhood unit is an integrated, and planned urban area
related to the larger community of which it is a part, consisting of residential districts, a
school or schools, shopping facilities, religious buildings, open spaces, and perhaps a degree
of service industry (Osborn & Whittick, 1978).
Neighbourhood is a subjective term which refer few blocks around neighbouring houses or
buildings. It includes a small area containing blocks and few hundred residents with some
basic amenities.It is a place with its own unique character and function, where people can
live, work, shop, and interact with their neighbours. The most sustainable neighbourhoods
tend to exhibit high levels of walkability, a sense of place, social cohesion and stability, and
neighbourhood resiliency amidst changing economic and socio political conditions.
CONCEPTUALIZATION OF NEIGHBOURHOOD
In 1920s Clarence Arthur Perry proposed a model of neighbourhood Unit. Perry described the
neighbourhood unit as that populated area which would require and support an elementary
school with an enrolment of between 1,000 and 1,200 pupils. This would mean a population
of between 5,000 and 6,000 people. Developed as a low density dwelling district with a
population of 10 families per acre, the neighbourhood unit would occupy about 160 acres and
have a shape which would render it unnecessary for any child to walk a distance of more than
one-quarter mile to school. About 10 percent of the area would be allocated to recreation, and
through traffic arteries would be confined to the surrounding streets, internal streets being
limited to service access for residents of the neighbourhood. The unit would be served by
shopping facilities, churches, and a library, and a community centre, the latter being located
in conjunction with the school(Gallion & Eisner, 1982).
Perry‟s idea of neighbourhood was further carried out and forwarded by different others.
Clarence Stein made certain extension to Perry‟s Idea. He increased the number of steps in
the hierarchy, advocating small neighbourhoods, groups of neighbourhood or districts uniting
to form the city. He extended the concept of neighbourhood beyond city into the region. In
1930 Walter Gropius developed the organic series: house, street, neighbourhood, and town;
and in relation to his tall apartment block, the parallel series: dwelling, apartment block,
neighbourhood and town. In 1961 GeoegiMinervin introduced a new chapter of residential
area called “micro district”. These micro-districts, which had populations of from 6000-8000
people, were equipped with schools, shops and social facilities, and were separated from
main roads by stretches of greenery, and were apparently similar to the neighbourhood unit.
a) Density- The term associated with large, impersonal apartment buildings, public
housing projects, or physical environments. In an official term instead of using
density it should be compact development or smart growth. Most of the residents in
urban area preferred higher density because these include more attractive
streetscapes, local shops and a greater diversity of housing choice.
b) Infill Development- The most fundamental feature of Sustainable Urban
Neighbourhood is its location- the fact that it is located within towns and cities. It not
only create attractive new buildings and housing units in existing urban area, but
entire neighbourhood that are more pedestrian-oriented, vibrant, diverse and
ecological.
c) Mixed-use development- The new urbanism and sustainability oriented design in
general is to include this variety of land uses within communities once again,
typically within neighbourhood centres or along main-street. If jobs, housing, shops,
and recreational facilities are closer together, the theory goes, then people will need
to drive less and neighbourhood will be more vibrant and liveable. This after, all, is
the model of the traditional town before the age of the automobile.
d) Streetscape design- Arterial corridor within almost any city or town offer extensive
opportunities for infill development. Luckily, there are well-established traditions of
large streets in many countries that both carry substantial volumes of vehicle traffic
and are green pedestrian-friendly places to be.
e) Traffic calming- As automobiles multiplied rapidly in industrialized nations in the
early and mid-twentieth century, many observers realized that they were degrading
neighbourhood quality. Traffic calming mechanism fall into two main categories:
those that seek primarily to reduce vehicle speeds and those that focus on lowering
traffic volumes. The other main approach to traffic calming- focusing on traffic
volume rather than speed.
f) Parks and open spaces- A better connection between human and natural
environments is a central challenge of sustainable development, neighbourhood
planning should seek to create a variety of open spaces and natural areas.Creating a
range of attractive open space needs to become a much more integral part of
neighbourhood planning.
g) Improving neighbourhood equity- Equity concerns are present at the neighbourhood
level, as at others. Sustainability at the neighbourhood level implies making every
neighbourhood accessible to all. The objective of sustainable development is not
green enclaves in upper middle class area, but well-rounded neighbourhoods that are
diverse and equitable as well as ecological and liveable.
h)
India needs to start thinking more pro-actively on sustainable solutions to its cities‟ problems.
Sustainable cities present a challenge that needs to address social, environmental and
economic sustainability concerns, as well as the inter-linkages between these. The little
empirical research done in this context in India does not taken into account features of urban
form, such as layout and density, in examinations of sustainability. This has led to significant
gaps in knowledge: there is no existing evidence in India that can explain if tenets of
sustainable cities are affected by, for example, residential density, transport accessibility and
layout (Ray & Vaidya, Planning for Sustainable Urban form and for Indian Cities, 2011).
The scenario of India is different from western world. Density play an important role in India,
post-independence urban planning in India has either ignored density or deliberately
discouraged it. This has led to sprawls or even worse, densification without the supporting
infrastructure. Higher income category populations prefer to stay away from city centre in
low to moderate densityareas. Lower income category prefer to stay near city centre because
of job opportunity.
Land use is one of the parameters which define the layout of neighbourhood in Indian
context. Land use is an important determinant of public transportation and sustainable urban
form and plays at city, zonal and neighbourhood scales. Effective land use planning in India
suffers from incongruous regulatory structures at the three levels of government, as well as
from other critiques of Master Plan preparation. There is lack of clarity on which services and
facilities are to be provided at what scale, and this requires further elaborate exercises. Many
cities in India are now formally moving towards mixed land use and implications of this on
sustainable urban form are still unknown. Most cities (mainly metros) fail to take into
account the possibility of providing services/facilities to residents vertically thereby leading
to more horizontal sprawl(Ray & Vaidya, Planning for Sustainable Urban Forn for Indian
Cities , 2011).
Access and transportation infrastructure are closely associated with density and land use and
layout characteristics; this determines the ease with which spaces and places can be reached.
Accessibility levels are defined on ability of users to reach their destinations (work areas,
market places, recreational places, etc.), as well as extent to which they have the means to
access places, services and facilities outside their local area(Ray & Vaidya, Planning for
Sustainable Urban Forn for Indian Cities , 2011).
Layout describes the spatial arrangement and configuration of elements at the street scale,
such as grid or cul-de-sac street patterns. The layout of a neighbourhood determines its
accessibility and influences pedestrian movement accordingly. More importantly, layout
directly affects the social and cultural vibrancy of a neighbourhood. Streets which are well
connected to services and facilities and support pedestrian access (taking lighting, paving,
safety, etc. into account) are generally more frequently accessed, leading to greater
concentration of multiple uses on these. This holds true at all three scales – neighbourhood,
zonal and city-level(Ray & Vaidya, Planning for Sustainable Urban Forn for Indian Cities ,
2011).
activities with hardly any residents‟ welfare. Concept of Smart Neighborhoods finds immense
significance in answering contemporary urban issues related to safety and welfare. This is
especially true in case of Tier 2 cities, which are next upcoming big urban centers.
Alpha-wise city vibrancy index by Morgan Stanley (Rathi & Desai, 2011) has considered
Bhopal among “Cities of Opportunities” in 2011. Envisaging future urbanization prospects in
the city, planning Smart Neighborhoods becomes expedient.
a. Access
Minal residency is present at about ¼ mile north of Raisen Road which is one of the trunk
routes of Bhopal. It is very well connected to BCLL buses route and other IPT and
complementary service routes. Within 500 meters of walking distance, buses running on
standard route can be used as public modes of travel. It is also well connected to other parts
of city with IPT services. However railway station (both Bhopal Junction and Habibganj) is
relatively away (not within 1/4 mile walking distance). (refer Table 1.1)
b. Location
By studying the span of development of past few years, „smartness‟ in terms of location can
be gauged for this neighborhood (Figure No. 1.1).
It is seen that prior to developments of Minal Residency in year 2002 there existed
settlements such as Narela Shangri. However it is also seen that Minal Residency in itself is
not on infill. This it can be appropriately said that though it is not on a previously developed
site but adjacent to existing development.
c. Land Use
The total area ofMinal residency is about 799352 square meter (197 acres) which is divided
under the given land uses (refer Table: 1.2). However if percentages of the above land uses
are considered and compared with the guidelines of UDPFI than it produces unsatisfactory
responses. There is a significant difference in the Land use standards given by UDPFI and the
percentages of land use allocated in the neighborhood.
13%
1% 4%
0% 4%
1%
77%
The information in the table is actual and prescribed for mandatory social infrastructure in the
neighborhood. Since the population of neighborhood is more than 5000, following social
infrastructure is necessary in Minal Residency.
It is seen that area dedicated for schools is 1434 square meters. This is equivalent to 0.35
acres. It is clear that the required area for schools is 11.85 acres. The area dedicated to
educational facilities is less.
It is also seen that area dedicated to commercial activities is 7438 square meters. This is
equivalent to 1.83 acres. It is clear that the required commercial area is 4.94 acres. The area
dedicated to commercial facilities is less.
In similar manner it is seen that area for community hall is 4423 square meters. This is
equivalent to 1.09 acres. It is clear that the required commercial area is 0.49 acres. The area
dedicated to community hall is more. Since it has been included in facilities and services,
which itself is in shortage.
The concept of the smart city still focuses mainly on the role of infrastructure, but much
research has also been carried out on the role of human capital, social and relational capital
and environmental interest as important drivers of urban growth.Several innovative
companies have created an eco-friendly smart neighbourhood model for sustainable living.
When there is no traffic on the streets, street lights turn themselves off. There are air-quality
meters in lamp posts to monitor pollution trends.Spanning from a sustainable platform that
allows neighbours and friends to safely rent their cars to each other to sustainable
neighbourhood(Cullen, n.d.). Community member interactions in a neighbourhood within a
smart city may lead to the emergence of more intelligent global behaviour.
Recommendation
Based on learnings from the case study following measures are devised with hope to develop
a prototype model of neighborhood planning which leads to smart city in Indian scenario
These measures are:
been underrepresented to analyze the level of service provided and engage in the
necessary political action to rectify the situation.
2. Neighborhood planning will result in a wider range of problems being addressed
by the planning process and an improvement in public services. The objective of
physical planning is to emphasis physical development. The programs are often
designed to encourage the consideration of social and public service delivery
problems as well as physical problems. Moreover it encourage the development of
self-help projects designed to supplement the service provided by the city.
3. In anticipation of future infill and redevelopment, the City shall prepare Infill Pre-
Plans for areas in the community according to an annually reviewed priority sequence
based on the following criteria:
Community need
Proximity to City Centre District and designated Neighborhood Centers
Availability of infrastructure
Proximity to community services and amenities
Development interest and/or market demand
4. Amendment of development regulations (density, floor area ratio, height, land use,
building codes) as per Urban development plans formulation and implementation and
other planning norms to achieve sustainable urban form.
5. Density: medium-to-high density (200-250 PPH) with options proposed taking into
view cost for providing and maintaining utilities, and reducing energy consumption –
Urban blocks (1-2 sq.km. area) of about 4 to 7-storey with density around 4000-8000
people per sq.km.is recommended at the neighborhood level.
6. Accessibility and transport: pedestrian focused within the neighborhood supported by
linked public spaces; strong (public) transport access on edges; restricting motorized
vehicular movement within neighborhoods.
7. Layout: Conical massing promoted (high density high rise in the center - be it
neighborhood or district or city - tapering out towards the edges); provide play areas
and public spaces next to taller building and using of solar panel; and vertical
randomization of buildings coupled with low coverage (higher FAR).
8. Technology Innovations: Use of solar power, wind power and biogas power
whichever is feasible for the project.(Smartnet GPS) will transmit location data and
established motion priority to the central software at the service center.The range of
technologies that could be accommodated and the policies needed to encourage their
development in the right places. Promoting green buildings, start using GPS and
Bluetooth devices can enhance the neighborhood concept and encourage the
development of smart citiy.
Conclusion
The paper is an endeavor to uncover the truth and encounter the real challenges that are lying
in implementation of neighborhood planning in India. Neighborhood comprise of both
physical and social relationship in the society.The concept of the neighborhood is well
established as a basic unit of planning the cities. Further, it is a popular and accepted element
of social and physical organization in the minds of most people. Besides good planning and
design decisions, the application of these principles also require supporting legal frameworks,
an analysis of the local society and economy, appropriate infrastructure technology and
capacity, and the institutional capacity to enforce decisions. Although the scenario of India is
different from western world, these parameters are highly interrelated and support each
other.High density provides the population and activity basis for a sustainable neighborhood;
adequate street density is the material basis; mixed land-use and social mix shape the land use
and social life in the neighborhood; and limited land use specialization is the first step
towards mixed neighborhoods.
References
Cullen, P. (n.d.). New European Economy. Retrieved from
http://www.neweuropeaneconomy.com:
http://www.neweuropeaneconomy.com/home-mainmenu-51/briefing-mainmenu-
86/537-the-worlds-smartest-cities
Gallion, A., & Eisner, S. (1982). The Urban Pattern: City Planning & Design. John Wiley &
Sons.
Green, G. P., & Haines, A. L. (2011). Asset Building & Community Development. SAGE
Publications.
India, G. o. (1996). Urban Developments Plans Formulation & Inplementation. New, Delhi:
Ministry of Urban Affairs & Employment.
Meenakshi. (2011). Neighborhood Unit and its Conceptualization in the Contemporary Urban
Context. Institute of Town Planners, 82-83.
Osborn, S. F., & Whittick, A. (1978). New Towns: The Answer to Megalopolis. Blackie
Academic & Professional.
Rathi, S., & Desai, R. (2011). linkback.morganstanley.com. Retrieved January 29, 2014, from
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CC
UQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Flinkback.morganstanley.com%2Fweb%2Fsendlink
%2Fwebapp%2FBMServlet%3Ffile%3Dp8nqjstu-3o4l-g000-bf29-
d8d3855ac300%26store%3D0%26user%3Ddu2n7fso2h1-35%26__gda__%3
Ray, S. I., & Vaidya, C. (2011). Planning for Sustainable Urban form and for Indian Cities.
Urban India Journal .
V.Narad, A. A., & V.Gupta, A. (2014). Role of Sustainable Neighbourhood in Urban Built
Environment. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 27-29.