Determination of ABO Blood Groups and RH Typing From Dry Salivary Samples
Determination of ABO Blood Groups and RH Typing From Dry Salivary Samples
100
IJCPD
Determination of ABO Blood Groups and Rh Typing from Dry Salivary Samples
Fig. 1: Collection of saliva sample using gauze piece Fig. 2: Collection of blood using disposable pipette
gastric juice, nasal secretions, vaginal secretions, sweat, tear, Children with systemic diseases and those with mental
urine, etc., from which blood groups can be determined.2 disabilities were excluded from the study. An informed
However, the presence of blood group substances in various consent was obtained from the parents of all the subjects
body secretions depends on whether the individual is a participating in the study.
secretor or a nonsecretor, which can be determined by the
presence of Lewis antigen.3 In some medico-legal cases like Collection of Samples
those involving child abuse, rape, robbery, and murders,
Before the extraction procedure, a small piece of gauze
blood may be absent at the scene, but saliva in some form
was given to each child, who was then asked to wet it
may be procured. This greatly helps in determining the
with his/her own saliva (Fig. 1). Soon thereafter, the saliva
blood group of a victim or a suspect. In such cases, saliva
sample was collected, and the extraction was carried out.
may be obtained in dry forms from bite marks, cigarette
A volume of 1 mL of socket blood was collected using a
ends, envelope flaps, dental appliances, etc.4
dropper inside an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid bulb
In recent years, many new techniques have been intro-
(Fig. 2). After the collection of these samples (Fig. 3), the
duced and many investigations have shown up to 100%
wet gauze pieces were allowed to dry at room tempera-
accuracy in detecting ABO blood groups from saliva.
ture. Once they dried up, they were taken in a collection
There are mainly two methods for detecting ABO blood
tube, diluted with 3 to 4 mL of distilled water and allowed
group substances from saliva.5
to rest overnight. The blood samples were immediately
1. Absorption–inhibition method
taken to the lab for blood grouping.
2. Absorption–elution method
Blood grouping and Rh typing from socket blood
The absorption–inhibition method is the easier and
were done using the slide agglutination method. Before
simpler of the two.
Moreover, establishing the use of saliva in blood
grouping could also further help establish the use of saliva
as a noninvasive technique in routine blood examination,
especially in children Thus, the present study aims at
evaluating the accuracy of ABO blood group determina-
tion and Rh typing from dried salivary samples.
Fig. 4: Anti A, Anti D, and Anti B antisera Fig. 5: Adding of antisera to the respective test tubes
carrying out blood grouping and Rh typing from the transfer it to a 12 × 75 mm tube. Centrifuge for at least
dried salivary samples, the presence of amylase activity 5 minutes. The denatured saliva after cooling was taken in
was checked for each dried sample using commercially four test tubes. A, B, D, and H antisera in the dilution of
available alpha amylase reagents. Only, once the posi- 1:10 was added to each test tube, and the test tubes were
tive amylase activity was determined, were the samples respectively labeled (Figs 4 and 5). A singe drop from the
considered fit for blood grouping and Rh typing. salivary sample was added to both the test tubes, thor-
To determine if a person is a secretor, the principle oughly shaken and incubated at 37° for 10 minutes. After
of Agglutination Inhibition is utilized. It works through 10 minutes, a single drop of freshly prepared pooled RBC
two processes. of known group (Fig. 6) was added to the respective test
1. Antibody Neutralization: Saliva is mixed with com- tube, shaken well, and further incubated for 15 minutes
mercial antisera and allowed to incubate briefly. If the at 37°. The samples were then checked for the presence
patient is a secretor, the blood group antigens in the or absence of agglutination (Fig. 7). All the results were
saliva will react with and neutralize the antibodies in compared with that obtained from socket blood and the
the commercial antiserum. It is necessary, however, to results were statistically analyzed.
dilute the commercial antiserum so that its antibody
titer more closely matches the antigen level in the Interpretation
saliva. • Agglutination in all of the patient test tubes indicates
2. Agglutination Inhibition: When commercial RBCs a negative result for secretor status.
of the appropriate blood group are added to the test • If any one of the patient test tubes is not agglutinated,
mixture, there should be no free antibody to agglutinate this indicates a positive test for secretor status, and the
them if the patient is a secretor, because the antibodies tube showing the nonagglutination should indicate
have already reacted with the blood group antigens in the ABO and Rh type.
the saliva. The reaction will be negative for agglutina-
tion, but is interpreted as positive for secretor status.
If the patient is a nonsecretor, there will be no blood
group antigens in the saliva; the antibodies in the antise-
rum will not be neutralized and will be free to react when
the test cells are added. Therefore, agglutination is a nega-
tive test for secretor status. Hence, for our samples, the
presence of agglutination means a negative test, and the
absence of agglutination is interpreted as a positive result.
Procedure
In order to denature the saliva, the diluted salivary
sample is placed in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes.
This inactivates enzymes that might otherwise destroy
blood group substances. Allow to cool briefly and then Fig. 6: Blood containing tube for collection of fresh RBCs
102
IJCPD
Determination of ABO Blood Groups and Rh Typing from Dry Salivary Samples
DISCUSSION
Blood group of an individual, once established at birth,
remains constant throughout one’s life. Hence, blood
groups can be successfully used for establishing the iden-
tity of an individual and in narrowing down the suspect
pool. Indirect blood grouping from saliva has been very
important in catching criminals in many a crime scene.
Apart from forensics, it has several other applications too.
Pawan Motghare et al4 in their study used the absorp-
tion–inhibition method for blood grouping and found
around 83% secretors among the subjects. ABO blood
grouping from saliva yielded around 85% positive cor-
relation to the blood samples. In a study conducted by
Emberibe et al,6 they studied 176 subjects for the presence
Fig. 7: Checking for the presence or absence of agglutination
of ABH antigen in saliva using the absorption–inhibition
method and their results showed 84.90% secretors. The
RESULTS present study showed a higher percentage of secretors as
In this study, 47 subjects were studied for the determi- well as a 100% correlation between the ABO blood grouping
from dried salivary samples and extraction socket blood.
nation of ABO blood groups and Rh typing from dried
The literature available on the presence of Rh antigen
salivary samples and correlating the outcome with the
in body secretions is very scanty and inconclusive.
blood samples obtained from the extraction sockets. Out
Wiener and Forer,7 claimed that saliva is free of Rh sub-
of these, three samples were discarded owing to contami-
stance. Levin and Ketzin,8 also failed to prove otherwise.
nation of the blood.
However, Boorman and Dodd9 were the first to have
The samples showed that 100% of the subjects were
claimed the demonstration of a small amount of Rh
secretors. Moreover, ABO Blood groups determined from
substance in Rh-positive individuals. In a series of 51 Rh-
the dried salivary samples showed a 100% correlation positive subjects, they reported evidence of secretion in
with the blood groups determined from the extraction 37 instances. They observed that the concentration of the
socket blood. Among the samples tested for ABO blood Rh-specific substance in saliva is less as compared with
grouping, 7 samples showed blood group A, 7 showed the tissues.10 In the present study as well, Rh activity did
blood group B, 16 showed blood group AB, and 14 not yield significant positive results.
showed blood group O (Table 1). For positive Rh typing, Since, there is a lack of significant research wherein
however, only a meager 14.81% positive correlation was both ABO blood grouping and Rh typing have been
obtained between the dried salivary samples and the attempted together from dried salivary sample, the
extraction socket blood, wherein only four dried salivary present study was undertaken to co-relate the presence
samples tested positive as compared with 27 extraction of A, B, H, and D antigens in the dried salivary samples
socket blood samples (Table 2). with that obtained from the blood. There are several other
Table 1: Correlation of ABO blood grouping between dried salivary samples and extraction socket blood
Dried salivary sample Extraction socket blood Dried salivary Extraction socket
Blood group type (number of samples) (number of samples) samples (%) blood (%)
Blood group A 7 7 15.9 15.9
Blood group B 7 7 15.9 15.9
Blood group AB 16 16 36.3 36.3
Blood group O 14 14 31.8 31.8
Table 2: Correlation of Rh typing between dried salivary samples and extraction socket blood
Dried salivary sample Extraction socket blood Dried salivary Extraction socket
Rh typing (number of samples) (number of samples) samples (%) blood (%)
Positive Rh activity 4 27 9.09 61.3
Negative Rh activity 40 17 90.91 38.7
applications for blood grouping from saliva. If a suitable 2. Neiders ME, Standish SM. Blood group determinations
and consistent method can be established, it could further in forensic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1977 Jan;21(1):
99-111.
propagate the use of saliva as a noninvasive technique in
3. Dacie JV, Lewis SM. The human red cell blood groups and
routine blood examinations, especially in children who the identification of the blood group antigen and antibodies.
have needle phobia. It could also prove to be an adjunct In: Practical hematology, 5th ed. Edinburgh and New York:
in cases of hematologic malignancies wherein an altera- Churchill Livingstone; 1975. p. 356.
tion of ABH antigens has been noted.11 Moreover, many 4. Motghare P, Kale L, Bedia AS, Charde S. Determination of
studies have correlated the secretor status and many efficacy and accuracy of ABO blood group from saliva. J Indian
Acad Oral Med Radiol 2011 Jul-Sept;23(3):163-167.
systemic illnesses like ankylosing spondylitis, peptic
5. Fiori A, Benciolini P. The ABO grouping of stains from body
ulcer, ovarian cysts, and even squamous cell carcinoma.12 fluids. Int J Legal Med 1972;70(4):214-222.
Thus, dried salivary samples proved to be a reliable 6. Emberibe AO, Igweagu CA, Osim EE. ABH secretor status in
source for ABO blood grouping; however, for the detec- saliva of Calabar Municipality residents. East Afr Med J 1992
tion of D antigen, a more technique-sensitive approach Jan;69(1):27-30.
needs to be developed. 7. Wiener AS, Forer S. A human serum containing four distinct
isoagglutinins. Proc Soc Exp Riol 1941;47:215-218.
8. Levine P, Burnham L, Katzin EM, Vogel P. The role of isoim-
CONCLUSION munization in the pathogenesis of erythroblastosis fetalis. Am
ABO blood grouping from dried salivary samples can J Obstet Gynec 1941;42:165.
9. Boorman KE, Dodd BE, Mollison PL. The clinical significance of
thus be put to immense use in several areas of forensic
the Rh factor. Br Med J 1943:1, 2, 535, 569
investigations. It could also help in developing alternate 10. Roy MN, Chatterjea JB. Observations on the presence of
methods for routine blood investigations in children and Rh substances in body fluids. J Indian Med Assoc 1961 Jul
adults. For establishing Rh typing from saliva, a more 16;37:53-55.
sensitive approach needs to be devised and put to use. 11. Van Loghem JJ Jr, Dorfmeier H, Van Der Hart M. Two A
antigens with abnormal serologic properties. Vox Sang. 1957
Jan;2(1):16-24.
REFERENCES
12. Sen MP, Vanishree M, Hunasgi S, Surekha R, Koneru A,
1. Fraser FC, Nora JJ. Blood group and serum protein. In: Genet- Manvikar V. A comparison of absorption inhibition and absorp-
ics of man, 1st ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lea and Febiger; 1975. tion elution methods for estimation of ABO blood groups in
pp. 195-203. saliva. J Med Radiol Pathol Surg 2015 Jan-Feb;1(1):1-4.
104