Conso CDP
Conso CDP
Conso CDP
1-1
Chapter 1. The Planning Environment and Planning Process
1.1 The Study Area 1-1
1.2 Planning Framework 1-3
Chapter 2: Vision, Mission, Goals and Strategies 2-1
2.1 Vision Statement 2-1
2.2 Mission 2-1
2.3 Goals and Strategies 2-1
Chapter 3: Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning Ordinance 3-1
Annexes
Annex A: List of Project Briefs
Annex B: Additional Projects
L IST OF F IGURES
List of Tables
Table 5-1 Goal-Achievement Matrix Format 5-11
Table 5-2 Weighted Goals 5-12
Table 5-3 Ranked GAM Summary 5-13
Table 5-4 Ranked List of Programs and Projects per Category 5-19
Table 5-5 Distribution of Income/Revenue by Source, 2010-2014 5-25
Table 5-6 City’s Total Receipt from 2012-2015 5-25
Table 5-7 CSFP’s Actual Expenditure by Object, 2013-2015 5-26
Table 5-8 Actual Expenditure by General Account, 2013-2015 5-27
Table 5-9 Revenue and Expenditure, 2013-2015 5-27
Table 5-10 Comparative Growth of Income and Expenditure, 2013-2015 5-28
Table 5-11 Projected LGU Development Financing Potential 5-29
1. T HE P LANNING E NVIRONMENT
1.1 T HE S TUDY A REA
City of San Fernando, Pampanga (CSFP) is located some 70
kilometers north of Metro Manila (Figure 1-1). It is situated at the
spatial centers of Pampanga and Central Luzon, thus, it enjoys
strategic locational advantage over other major urban regional
centers. It can be accessed through the national key arterial
road and expressway systems such as the Manila North Road
(MNR) a.k.a. MacArthur Highway, Gapan-San Fernando-
Olongapo (GSO) Road a.k.a. Jose Abad Santos Avenue (JASA),
the North Luzon Expressway (NLEs), and the Subic-Clark-Tarlac
Expressway (SCTEx). The city is traversed by MNR from north to
south, bisecting it into eastern half and western half. JASA, on
the other hand, negotiates the city from east to west, dividing it
into northern part and southern part.
The resulting crossroads between JASA, NLEX, and MNR are all
located in CSFP. These favorable conditions on access and
circulation helped transform CSFP in to a regional transportation
hub, financial center, regional administrative center, regional
urban center, and an inter-regional retail services center.
All its 35 barangays are classified urban. CSFP has a total land
area of 69.32 square kilometers (sq.km.) that represents 3.25
percent of the total land area of Pampanga. At annual growth
rate of 2.57 percent, CSFP’s 2010 census year population of
285,912 is projected to reach 324,573 mid 2015. CSFP, along
1-1
with other 32 of the total 130 cities and municipalities in Central
Luzon with population ranging from 100 – 400 thousand are
under large city category.
Figur
e 1-
1.
The
Stud
y
Area
1-2
1.2 P LANNING F RAMEWORK
To incorporate climate adaptation and vulnerability reduction
measures in the plans of CSFP, the study team adopted the
disaster risk reduction (DRR) mainstreaming framework of NEDA
which was prepared through a technical assistance jointly
funded by United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and
European Commission Humanitarian Aid (EUHA) in 2008 (Figure
1-2). The framework has three (3) major components, namely: i)
disaster risk assessment (DRA), ii) entry points of DRA in plan
formulation process, and iii) investment programming,
budgeting and results monitoring. A GIS-based sieve mapping
tool was used to formulate the land use and settlement
framework of CSFP. DRR-CCA measures and principles were
introduced in the sieve map to deliver settlements from harm’s
way and achieve the highest and best use of land.
Figure 1-2. Climate Change (CC) and Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)
Mainstreaming Framework
1-3
2. V ISION , M ISSION , G OALS AND S TRATEGIES
2.1 V ISION S TATEMENT
To transform CSFP into a regional destination that will showcase
the Kapampangan history, people, culture, and achievements
to fellow Asians and to the world, the vision was formulated as
shown below:
City of San Fernando, Pampanga: Center of
Kapampangan culture; and
A preferred tourism destination in Asia by
2020.
2.2 M ISSION
The Fernandino will aim to improve the quality of life of
everyone, leaving no one behind. As such, its mission is stated as
follows:
To develop a livable, ecologically-balanced and
economically-viable City through effective and socially
inclusive governance that will enhance the quality of life
of Fernandinos.
2-1
Figure 2-1. A development framework for CSFP showing the linkages and
transformation processes between growth drivers, strategies, goals, mission,
and vision
H ERITAGE
Cultural and heritage refers to the legacy of physical artifacts
and intangible attributes of a society from past generations,
2-2
restored and preserved in the present, and handed to future
generations. It includes buildings, monuments, landscapes,
books, works of art, and artifacts or folklore, traditions, language,
local knowledge, historical milestones or challenges (e.g.
eruption of Mt. Pinatubo), and the like. The Fernandino will
preserve, enrich, and promote the Kapampangan cultural
heritage, and it shall assume the lead role in realizing this
objective.
COMMUNITIES
2-3
D. V ULNERABILITY - RESPONSIVE A ND GROWT H -
2-4
4. COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
I. I NTRODUCTION
The City Government of San Fernando (P) in the next ten years
(2016-2025) shall implement policies, programs and projects
based from comprehensive analysis of the various challenges
confronted by the City. The main objective of the
comprehensive development planning is to fully capture the
problems/issues faced by its citizens, as well as their needs and
aspirations.
L EGAL M ANDATE
The Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act 7160) under
Section 6, mandates every local government unit (LGU) to
prepare a comprehensive multi-sectoral development plan to
be initiated by its local development council, and approved by
its Sanggunian. Furthermore, Section 6, Chapter 2 of RA 7160
states that an LGU has the power to create bodies that shall be
deemed necessary in the implementation of its development
plans to attain proper governance and promote the common
good.
4-1
The City Planning and Development Coordinator’s Office of the
City of San Fernando identified that it is necessary to review,
amend, reformulate or enhance the City Comprehensive Land
Use Plan (CLUP) and Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP)
taking into account climate change adaptation and disaster
risk reduction (DRR) concerns, alongside with the rapid
urbanization faced by the City. Based on the Philippine Disaster
Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010 (RA 10121), all
LGUs are mandated to prepare local DRR management plans
that will build the adaptive capacities of communities, increase
the resilience of the vulnerable sectors, as well as optimize
disaster mitigation opportunities.
The planning process ensures that the City of San Fernando (P)
Comprehensive Development Plan is consistent with the vision
of the Central Luzon Regional Development Plan, and the
Integrated Barangay Development Plans of the 37 barangays
are embodiment of the said CDP.
S ECTORAL C ONCERNS
Most of the sectoral issues and concerns reflected in this Plan
were culled out from the Socio-Economic and Biophysical Profile
(SEBP) of the City. The SEBP contained analysis of the problems
identified and were validated during the conduct of public
consultations participated by various stakeholders. The
consultations were done in order to formulate a plan where the
citizens can have a sense of ownership of the programs/projects
being implemented in the City.
4-2
population which includes among others, the indigent senior
citizens, street children, and persons with disabilities.
4-3
secure, resilient, systematic, and competitive city shall be the
primary concern to achieve good governance.
4-4
Other sources of information were obtained from the public
consultations. The problems and issues initially identified were
validated by the stakeholders. The planning team interviewed
key informants to provide detailed information on the subject.
The key informants or sectoral experts were mostly head of the
city offices such as the City Social Welfare Office, City
Environment and Natural Resource Office, City Engineer’s
Office, among others.
4-5
Technical Working Groups (TWGs) on Social Development,
Economic Development, Physical/Land Use Development,
Environmental Management, and Institutional Management.
4-6
(Pampanga), the region (Central Luzon), to other highly
urbanized cities in the province (Angeles City), and to the
country as a whole.
4-7
(3) O BJECTIVE F ORMULATION
Like the goal, an objective is also a condition when the problem
should have been addressed. The difference is that objective
has a short timeframe, sectoral, responds to a specific problem
and more specific compared to the goal. The attainment of
objectives shall lead to the achievement of a particular goal.
4-8
4.1 S OCIAL D EVELOPMENT P LAN
4.1.2 C HA LLENGES
E DUCA TION
4-9
aged children. Around 20 percent of students are said to be
malnourished.
S OCIAL WELFARE
B) P RE VA L E N CE O F MEN DICA N T S AN D CHIL DRE N IN CON FL ICT
WIT H T HE L A W ( CICL )
C) L A CK O F DA TA ON T HE P RE VA LE N CE O F SU BS T AN CE A BU S E
4-10
H EALTH
D) LOW U S E O F FA MIL Y PLA NN ING ME T HO DS (LOW
CO N T RA CE PT IVE PRE VAL E N CE RA T E )
MO RBIDIT Y
4-11
H OUSING
F) E XPA N DIN G NU MBE R O F I N FO RMAL S E TT L ER FA MIL IE S ( IS F )
A) H IG H Q UA L IT Y HEA L T H SE RVICE DE L IV E RY
4-12
subsistence and medical needs. The city government
emphasizes the important role of the elderly in nation building,
and recognizes their integral part in the city hence giving full
support to the improvement of their well-being and their full
participation in the society. The relevance of the City’s social
welfare programs for senior citizens and PWDs is a development
opportunity for transforming resources into active exponents of
development.
C) S T RO N G LO CA L GO VE RN ME N T S U PPO RT T O E A RL Y
C HIL DHO O D C A RE A ND D E VE LO PMEN T (ECCD) S Y S T E M
4.1.4 G OALS
To improve the quality of life of Fernandinos through the
provision of quality social services through:
Affordable tertiary education
4-13
Quality basic education
Accessible health care
Affordable housing/settlement
Adequate social welfare programs
E DUCATION
To increase national achievement test results above the
75% minimum standard
S OCIAL W ELFARE
To alleviate and uplift the socio-economic condition of the
disadvantaged and marginalized groups, through the
provision of social services and other protective services
towards rehabilitation and improve functionality (children in
conflict with the law, vulnerable women in difficult
circumstances including solo parents, out of school youth,
elderly/senior citizens and persons with disabilities).
H EALTH
To reduce the prevalence of lifestyle diseases (non-
communicable) as leading causes of morbidity and
mortality in the City
To improve access to reproductive health services by
increasing contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) from 21%
to at least 50%
4-14
H OUSING
To reduce the number of informal settler families (ISF) by at
least 20% from the 2015 data
E DUCATION
Fully implement strategic directions established by
Department of Education to ensure improvement in
performance indicators
Provision of adequate instructional materials and
equipment (e.g. desks, tables, books, computers),
development of learner-centered curriculum, and
improvement of quality of instruction and professional
development of teachers.
Rehabilitate school infrastructures to promote environment
more conducive for learning
H EALTH
Scale-up promotive and preventive public health programs
to improve health-seeking behavior (including nutrition)
among the most vulnerable population
Provision of family planning commodities and information
dissemination and awareness campaign on family planning
H OUSING
Intensify partnership with key shelter agencies (i.e.,HUDCC,
HDMF, NHA, SHDA, CREBA) to implement local shelter plan
4-15
Intensify prevention and control of informal settlers through
strict implementation of RA 8368 or Anti-Squatting Law
S OCIAL W ELFARE
Strengthen Women and Child Protection Center which
caters the needs of children in conflict with the law, sexually
abused children, abused women, and habitual mendicants
Strict implementation of Presidential Decree No. 1563 or the
Anti-Mendicancy Law which includes regularity of the anti-
mendicancy rescue operation
Proper implementation/coordination of diversion programs
for the CICL
Propose comprehensive program for the minor drug
surrenderers and strengthen barangay anti-drug abuse
councils (BADAC)
E DUCATION
S U PPL E ME NT AL FE E DING IN E L EMEN T A RY S CHO OL S
4-16
A L T E RNA T IVE L E A RN ING S Y S T E M / N ON - FORMA L E DU CA T ION
P RO G RAM
E DU CA T IO N TO E MPL O YMEN T P RO G RA MS
H EALTH
N O N - COMMUN ICA BLE PRE VE N T IO N A N D CON T ROL PRO G RA MS
F A MIL Y H E AL T H P ROG RA M
M ICRO N U T RIEN T S U PPL E ME N TA T ION P ROG RAM
HEALTH AND W E LL NE S S P ROG RAM
H OUSING
S O CIA L IZE D H OU S ING P RO G RA M : C O MMU N IT Y M O RTGA G E
P RO G RAM
4-17
The Community Mortgage Program (CMP) is a mortgage
financing of the National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation
(NHMFC) which assists legally organized associations of
underprivileged and homeless citizens to purchase and develop
a tract of land under the concept of community ownership. The
primary objective of the program is to assist residents of blighted
areas to own the lots they occupy, or where they choose to
relocate to and eventually improve their neighborhood and
homes to the extent of their affordability.
S OCIAL W ELFARE
A N T I -M E N DICAN CY P ROG RA M
T HE L O CA L P AN TA WID
4-18
The 4Ps has dual objectives as the flagship poverty alleviation
program: (1) social assistance, giving monetary support to
extremely poor families to respond to their immediate needs
and (2) social development, breaking the intergenerational
poverty cycle by investing in the health and education of poor
children through programs such as health check-ups for
pregnant women and children aged 0-5, deworming of school
children aged 6-18, enrollment of children in day care,
elementary, and secondary schools, and family development
sessions.
4-19
P RO G RAMS FO R S PE CIA L G ROU PS
Senior Citizens
-Local Social Pension Program
Solo Parents
-Solo Parents Capability Program
4-20
4.2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4.2.1 INTRODUCTION
The City of San Fernando has taken the lead role in the region in
providing a strategic location and safe environment for business
institutions to operate. Establishment of private schools and
universities, shopping malls, supermarkets, restaurants, hotels,
and resorts paved way for the influx of more tourists and settlers
that however encourage conversion of the City’s land from
agricultural to residential and commercial purposes. Hence, the
challenge remains for the City to sustain the needed and
suitable infrastructures and services to optimize potential
remunerations without impairing its land resources for further
economic development.
4.2.2 CHALLENGES
4-21
B) LOW T OU RIS M T RA JE CT O RY
Business opportunities have been on the rise in the City. With its
strategic location, influx of investors and migrants is no longer a
surprise for its fast growing market potential. Such development
may stimulate potential upturn of the tourism sector with its
efforts to preserve and promote its cultural and heritage milieu.
The number of built heritage preserved has doubled from 14
since 2005 to 33 in 2014. However, tourism growth trajectory in
the City has not vastly spiraled up. Efforts are poured down to
develop and organize further identified landmarks as part of a
tourism package in the province as well as for the whole region;
but little attention has been caught to increase the City’s tourist
inflows.
OF MSME S
4-22
transfer from various destinations within the City and to its neighboring
towns will not become detrimental to its further development.
4.2.3 POTENTIALS
A) I M PRO VE MEN T ON T HE E AS E O F DO IN G BU S IN E S S
C) E ME RG IN G R OL E AS T HE F IN AN CIAL OR B U S IN ES S D IS T RICT
4-23
D) S U PPO RT OF FOOD AND B E VE RAG E M AN U FACT U RIN G
4.2.4 GOALS
The overarching goal of sustaining a robust economy with well-
protected natural resources and enhanced cultural
preservation shall guide the City in maximizing its full potential as
a regional growth hub in support of its vision being the center of
Kapampangan culture and a preferred tourism destination in
2022.
4-24
4.2.5 OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS
The following objectives and targets are identified to help
achieve the above goal:
4.2.6 STRATEGIES
AGRICULTURE
a) Improve market access and agribusiness
b) Adaptation of scientific farming and utilization of modern
equipment
c) Further development of manufacturing and agribusiness
industries
d) Rationalize land use allocation and conversion
e) Provide scholarships for agricultural courses
4-25
f) Adoption of sustainable farming practices such as organic
farming
TOURISM
a) Improve marketability and accessibility of tourism sites
b) Strengthen community participation
c) Accreditation of tourism-related establishments from the
Department of Tourism
d) Formulate the Tourism Development Plan
e) Declaration of Heritage District/Lazatin Blvd. as Tourism
Enterprise Zone
f) Restoration of the City Hall Building
g) Strengthen the City and Barangay Tourism and Arts Council
4-26
Clark
Subic Day 3
Pasalubong Center
Metropolitan Cathedral
Candaba Wetlands
Local Resto Everybody’s Cafe
Pinatubo Trek
Train Station
Local Hotel
Manila
Figure 4-2. A Sample Tourism Hub and Spoke Framework for the City of San Fernando
4-27
4.2.5 PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Below is the list of existing and proposed programs, projects, and
activities of the City of San Fernando that will facilitate the
realization of its goal and objectives:
AGRICULTURE
A) F A RME RS A S S EMBL Y /I N FO RMA T ION D IS S EMIN A T IO N
P RO G RAM ( S CIE N T IFIC FA RM ING AN D U T IL IZA T ION O F
MO DE RN E QU IPME N T )
B) F A RME R F IE L D S CHO O L P RO JE CT
4-28
TRADE AND INDUSTRY
C ) I N DU S T RY C LU S T E RIN G D E VELO PME N T P RO G RA M
D) O N E T O WN /O N E B A RANG A Y O N E P RO DU CT P RO JE CT
4-29
TOURISM
E) T O U RIS M P RO MO T ION S P ROG RA M
4-30
G) C RE A T ION OF V IS IT O R ’ S B U REA U AND T OU RIS M N E T WO RK
H) B A RA N GA Y T O U RIS M P ROG RA MS
4-31
4.3 E NVIRONMENT M ANAGEMENT P LAN
4.3.2 C HA LLENGES
4-32
demand and water availability in the future creates a challenge
in effective water resource management in the City.
4-33
D. D U MPIN G O F S OL ID WA ST E S IN CRE EK S
S O U RCES
4-34
F. D IS PA RIT Y IN CA PA BIL I T IE S A ND WIL L INGNE S S A MO NG
G. L A CK O F S E PT AG E MANA G EME NT S Y S TE M
4-35
components for the implementation and construction of a
septage management system.
A. L A N D R E S OU RCE S
In terms of soil type, the City has extensive sandy areas which
provides for good internal drainage. This however, may not be
conducive for production of crops that require submerged
conditions such as rice. Silt loam can be found in the southern
portion of the City, the same area that serves as catch basin of
surface runoff flowing in the San Fernando River. In general, the
soil condition is ideal for built development although the subsoil
conditions may prove otherwise. Studies conducted by NWRB
and the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) in 2010
reveal that extensive areas in the City may not be able to
support high rise development.
B. W A T E R R E S O U RCES
4-36
Maimpis Creek, Calulut Creek and Mapalad Creek. These four
creeks flow southwards of the City and converge at the San
Fernando River.
4.3.4 G OALS
Sustainable environmental management through sound policies
and projects will be pursued by the City in order to ensure that
the quality of the urban landscape will be supportive of the 2022
vision of the City as the Center of Kapampangan Culture and a
preferred tourism destination in Asia.
4-37
d) To maintain air quality within standards set by R.A. 8749 or
the Clean Air Act;
e) To assess and monitor concentration of particulate
matter in the air;
f) To identify areas for tree planting and greenbelt
development;
g) Issuance of 5-year and 10-year exit plans to livestock
production farms;
h) To improve water quality and achieve standards set by
R.A. 9275 or the Clean Water Act;
i) To assess and monitor water quality on major rivers and
creeks within the city;
j) To ensure proper segregation, collection, transport,
storage, treatment, and disposal of solid waste including
healthcare waste management;
k) To enhance capabilities of local stakeholders in
implementing R.A. 9003;
l) To improve sanitation and maintain a good urban
environmental quality; and,
m) To promote Green Development
4-38
Identification and inventory of abandoned irrigation
wells, deep wells, and shallow wells, including force
pumps and manual pumps
E NVIRONMENTAL Q UALITY
Air Quality
Water Quality
4-39
A. I N T E G RAT E D G ROU N DWA T E R M ANA G EMEN T P RO G RA M
4-40
c) To develop appropriate institutional arrangements and
sound policies to ensure efficient and sustainable
groundwater management practices.
C. S E A L IN G OF A BA N DON E D W E LL S P RO JE CT
D. A IR AND W A T E R P O L LU T IO N C ON T RO L P RO G RA M
4-41
f) Water Quality Monitoring Project;
g) Activation of River Patrols in Barangays
E. S O L ID W A S T E M AN AG E ME N T A SS IS T AN CE P RO G RAM FO R
B A RA NGA Y S AN D C OMMUN IT IE S
4-42
facilities. At the LGU level, one (1) existing Sewage Treatment
Plant in Baliuag, Bulacan was constructed by the Water District.
4-43
4.4 P HYSICAL AND L AND U SE D EVELOPMENT
P LAN
4.4.1 I NTROD UCTION
Strategic infrastructure and land use development are vital
components in the pursuit of economic growth of a city,
municipality, province, and even a country. In the case of City
of San Fernando (CSFP), the basic infrastructure systems are
already in place. However, urbanization, population growth,
and sustained local economic development are placing
considerable challenges on land use management and
infrastructure development. It has been cited that inadequacies
in infrastructure are critical constraints to investment and growth
(Asian Development Bank, 2007). With the city’s essential role as
one of the major economic and service centers of the region,
land use planning and management as well as infrastructure
investments to ensure easy access and connectivity among
people, places, and commodities are essential. These capital
intensive investments must be anchored on well-defined goals,
strategies, and objectives.
4.4.2 C HA LLENGES
A. L A N D U SE
A1.1 L A N D I DL IN G AND L AN D B AN K ING
4-44
production to decline. Idle agricultural lands, like unbuilt
planned unit developments (PUDs), contribute in precluding the
city’s food security efforts because of forgone land productivity.
Fully implementing the provision of Local Government Code of
1991 that imposes five (5) percent real property tax on idle lands
may help address this problem.
A1.3 C O N FL ICT IN G L AN D U S E S
4-45
B. I N FR A STR UCTUR E D EVELOPMENT
B1.1 R O A D N E T WO RK C ONG E S T IO N
V A RIO U S R O A DS IDE S
4-46
challenge. This concern may be attributed to the increasing
number of establishments along major thoroughfares in the city.
Causes of this challenge include narrowness of several roads
and insufficient parking spaces in commercial establishments,
hospitals, schools, and other institutions along thoroughfares. As
such, mobility is impeded within the city.
4-47
B1.3 S T RE E T L IG HT IN G AN D R OA D I L LU MINAT IO N C ON CE RN S
4-48
Another challenge of the city is the maintenance and
monitoring of the cemeteries and memorial parlors’ adherence
to Presidential Decree 856 or the Code on Sanitation of the
Philippines which could affect health and sanitation in the
nearby communities. Buffer zones from the cemetery to
neighboring communities should be properly observed.
4-49
(RE) sources would be beneficial. CSFP on its part may
encourage the development of solar panel roofs in cooperation
with the local electric utility.
4-50
valuable potentials of the city towards providing extensive
infrastructure systems.
4-51
Figure 4-4. Proposed hierarchy of urban centers in Central Luzon
4.4.4 G OALS
The physical and land use development goal of City of San
Fernando is to sustain the growth of the city by providing the
enabling infrastructure systems and proper land use
management geared towards the following:
4-52
a.1. To rehabilitate and modernize utilities and
transportation systems
a.2. To increase road density
a.3. To manage traffic volume
a.4. To improve travel time within the city
a.5. To reduce traffic accidents
a.6. To improve pedestrian facilities
a.7. To further develop traffic and road illumination
b) To provide access to major tourism destinations;
c) To develop and construct additional tourism
infrastructures
d) To attain adequate and effective drainage, sewerage,
and flood control systems
e) To further enhance the delivery of social infrastructure
facilities
f) To modernize administrative infrastructures
g) To sustain the delivery of economic infrastructures
h) To upgrade utility infrastructures
i) To improve access to information on the City’s exposure
to various natural hazards (such as flooding) and
emergencies
h.1. To modernize Information and Communications
Technology (ICT) facilities and systems in the city
h.2. To improve response lead time of
responders/rescuers in terms of traffic and other
emergencies
4-53
c. Rehabilitate and modernize transportation systems
d. Provision/construction of new access roads and alternate
roads
e. Implement non-motorized and pedestrian-oriented
transportation systems
f. Improve the Traffic Management Bureau (Traffic
Management Division) in the City
g. Designation of Traffic Discipline Zones
h. Provision of Median Strip on CSFP roads that will also be
used for the installation of traffic lights
i. Sustain the delivery of economic infrastructures
j. Enhance the delivery of social infrastructure facilities
k. Modernize administrative infrastructures
l. Upgrading of Utility Infrastructure System
m. Modernize Information and Communications Technology
(ICT) facilities and systems
4-54
Development is recommended to be undertaken by the city
government.
SYSTEM S
4-55
E. I MPLEMENT NON - MOTOR IZED AND PEDEST R IAN -
LIGHTS
4-56
J. E N HA N CE THE DE LIVER Y OF SOC IAL INFR ASTR UC TUR E
FA CILI TIES
4-57
M. M ODER NIZE I NFOR MATION AND C OMMUNICATION S
T ECHN OLOGY (ICT) FACI LI TIES AND SYST EMS
a. Information Technology (IT) infrastructure upgrading
project
b. Command and Control Center (C3) Development
Project
c. Wired and wireless communication systems expansion
project
4-58
B I BLI OGRAPHY
Street Lighting and Road Safety. (2015). Retrieved July 22, 2016, from The Royal Society for
the Prevention of Accidents: http://www.rospa.com/
Cities Alliance (CA) and the World Bank (WB). (2015). Transport and Traffic Management Plan
for San Fernando City, Pampanga. Almec Corporation.
CLUP of CSFP, 2012-2021. (n.d.). Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the City of San Fernando,
Pampanga 2012-2021. CSFP.
Herron, D. (2015, April 14). Traffic Congestion. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from Green
Transportation.info: http://greentransportation.info/
Orejas, T. (2016, February 3). Pampanga city shuns Metro jam. Inquirer.net.
Pia Agatep, Ronald Catagena, and Paulie Mora. (2014, March 20). Improving Mobility in
Cities. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from League of Cities of the Philippines:
http://www.lcp.org.ph/11/26/improving-mobility-in-cities
4-59
4.5 D EVELOPMENT A DMINISTRATION
4.5.1 I NTRODUCTION
According to the Local Government Code of 1991, every local
government has the mandate to ensure a responsive and
accountable local government structure through the institution of
efficient mechanisms, initiatives, and referendum. With the power
vested on the units, they must attain their fullest development as
self-resilient communities in collaboration with various development
partners in the fulfillment of national goals and local development
objectives. The linkage between the planning and implementation
process may be ambiguous. As such, the success in this process
lays fully on the perspective and understanding of the city on how
to maximize its resources in order to deliver transparent and
accountable public services.
4-60
achievement of an accountable, transparent, participatory, and
self-resilient local government.
C. W E A K DA TA MAN AG E ME N T SY S T EM
4-61
measure the performance and sustainability of the national and
regional agencies, local government sectors, and stakeholders.
D. W E A K P O L ICE F O RCE
E. I N S U FFICIE N T S T O RA G E FA CIL IT IE S
F. I N S U FFICIE N T DRRM P E RS O NN E L
4-62
G. D IS PA RIT Y IN T HE FIRE ME N - T O - PO PUL AT IO N RAT IO
A. M A IN T E NA N CE OF ISO 9001:2008
For 10 consecutive years, the city was conferred the ISO 9001:2008
Certification for having joint efforts in providing efficient and
effective management system. The city’s sustained delivery of
quality business permit and licensing procedure is the primary
factor in receiving this certification. Thus, the city is expected to at
least maintain or even improve ease of doing business.
B. R E CO G N IT IO N TO BE A B U S IN E S S -F RIE NDLY C IT Y
4-63
C. H IG H C O MPE T IT IVE N E SS I N DE X
D. H IG HE R IN T E RN AL RE VE N U E S
E. E S T A BL IS HE D DRRMO
4.5.4 G OALS
Effective and inclusive governance through the collective efforts of
the private sector, local government, citizenry, and other
stakeholders will be the guiding principle of the city to ensure a
4-64
responsive, transparent, and competent administration as the
Center for Kapampangan Culture by 2022.
4-65
4.5.7 P ROGRAMS AND P ROJECTS
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
B. F A S T E R T RA N SA CT ION P ROG RA M
4-66
PEACE AND ORDER
D. I N T E N S IFICA T IO N OF P O L ICE F O RCE
4-67
Consequently, intensive training shall be provided to the BDRRM
Staff to strengthen the barangay’s Quick Response Capabilities.
Said activities are listed below:
FIRE PROTECTION
G. I MPRO VE ME N T A N D MO DE R N IZA T ION O F F IRE P RE VE N T IO N
AND P ROT E CT ION P ROG RA M
The city targeted to reduce the fire incidents by 10% and response
time by 75% by 2020. Thus, the fire department of the city and the
barangays shall be given competent skills and capabilities training.
Activities and programs include, among others, Barangay Fire
Brigade Project, and Reactivation and repair of barangay fire
hydrants.
4-68
4.6 D ISASTER R ISK R EDUCTION AND C LIMATE
C HANGE A DAPTATION
Republic Act (RA) No. 9729 also known as the Climate Change
Act of 2009 and RA 10121 or the National Disaster Risk Reduction
and Management Act of 2010 mandate local government units
(LGUs) to mainstream their local Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)
and Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) plans to their local
development plans. These documents will serve as roadmaps in
addressing and mitigating the impacts of disasters and climate
change in the city.
4.6.2 C HA LLENGES
T HO S E A LO NG MA JO R CR E E K S
4-69
2015). Situated in a relatively flatland with elevations ranging
from below one (1) meter to more than 70 meters above mean
sea level, City of San Fernando is generally susceptible to
flooding. About 20 percent of CSFP barangays (7 out of 35) are
entirely situated in areas highly susceptible to flooding while
some portions of other barangays are exposed to low, and
moderate flooding susceptibility. The city’s estimated built-up
area susceptible to flooding is at 3,554 ha which is 99.9 percent
of the city’s total built-up.
FL O ODIN G
L IQ U E FA CT IO N
4-70
71.63 percent and 8.92 percent are with moderate and low
susceptibility to liquefaction. This phenomenon can be
observed in saturated soils such as those near rivers, bays and
other bodies of water. Since CSFP is part of Pampanga and is
standing on mostly sand and silt, a big earthquake can
generate liquefaction in the city and could cause harm to the
population and built environment of the city.
4-71
to be experienced in the province of Pampanga by 2020 and
2050, respectively. However, during rainy season (JJA) until the
month of February, rainfall is likely to increase as much as 16.3
percent which could result flooding (if not properly managed) in
the city.
4.6.3 G OALS
The disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation
(DRR/CCA) goal of City of San Fernando is to provide safe and
resilient environment by preventing hazards and mitigate their
impacts through early detection of vulnerabilities and exposures
and strengthening capabilities of communities through
synergized planning and resources.
4-72
acceptable standards during or immediately after a
disaster
c.2. Decrease the number of preventable deaths and
injuries
c.3. Provide basic subsistence needs of affected
population
d) Recovery and rehabilitation
d.1. Restore and improve facilities, livelihood and living
conditions and organizational capacities of
affected communities, and reduce disaster risks in
accordance with the “building back better”
principle
d.2. Restore people’s means of livelihood and continuity
of economic activities and businesses
d.3. Restore shelter and other buildings/installation
d.4. Reconstruct infrastructures and other public utilities
4.6.5 STRATEGIES
The following strategies were crafted to transform the DRR/CCA
goal of CSFP into concrete results:
4-73
A. RE DU CE VU LN E RA BIL IT Y AN D E XPO SU RE OF T HE
DRA IN AG E WA Y S
4-74
D. P RO VIS IO N O F BA S IC IN FRA S T RU CT U RE FOR RE S PO N S E A N D
RE HA BIL IT A T IO N
4-75
5. L OCAL D EVELOPMENT I NVESTMENT
P ROGRAMMING
5.1 B ACKGROUND
Development investments are collective public investments
categorized into “hard” and “soft” assets. Examples of hard
assets include infrastructures such roads and bridges,
slaughterhouses, community centers and other buildings, water
and wastewater treatment plants, construction equipment, etc.
Soft assets cover human resource programs such as
employment, business development programs like credit
facilities and livelihood programs.
5-1
The basic reference used in the preparation of the LDIP is the
Guidelines on Local Planning and Expenditure Management,
Volume 3 (Investment Programming Revenue Generation). The
said guidelines illustrated the seven-step process (Figure 1-2)
involved in LDIP formulation, namely:
Step 1. Establish LDIP policies. Key policies that guide the
investment programming process are defined. These
include, among others, the time frame, methods of
financing, and criteria for prioritization.
Step 2. Develop and define the prioritization approach.
Criteria for prioritizing and ranking the PPAs are defined.
Step 3. Formalize and rank the list of development
investment projects. Total investment requirements of the
PPAs are estimated. PPAs are then scored and ranked
using the criteria and procedures developed in Step 2.
Step 4. Analyze the development investment financing
capacity. The capability of the city to fund the PPAs is
estimated.
Step 5. Iteratively develop the financing plan and finalize
the investment schedule. The annual investment
requirement estimated in Step 3 is matched with the
initial annual investment capacity (funding capability)
estimated in Step 4. If they match, then the financing
plan and investment schedule are finalized. If not, then
the project list is reviewed on the cost side and/or
additional sources identified on the revenue side.
Step 6. Legally adopt the LDIP. The final LDIP financing
plan and investment schedule are packaged into a draft
LDIP for review and endorsement to the Sangguniang
Panglungsod; the Sanggunian deliberates and then
legally adopts the LDIP.
Step 7. Update the LDIP. The LDIP is updated annually to
reflect changing field and financing conditions, and to
5-2
include new project requests arising from
changes/adjustments.
The selection of projects that were included in the final list were
based on the evaluation of projects’ possible contribution to the
attainment of the City’s long term goals, and in the case of land
5-3
use-based contingent projects, their consistency to the
preferred spatial development strategy.
i. Trim down the final list further, starting from the bottom of the
ranked list until the cumulative total cost matches with the
available funds.
ii. Retain the project list and program but implement project
funds by:
5-4
subjects and activities within the prescribed powers of
the LGU.
arrangements.
F UTURE
An investment program is cognizant of future demand or needs.
Therefore, limiting the number of projects depending on the
availability of funds tend to be unacceptable since there are
additional projects that need to be funded in the long run. LGUs
are then required to augment their resources through bolder
options (e.g. loans, and bond flotation, among others) to be
able to meet financing requirement, as authorized under the
Local Government Code (LGC).
5-5
programming. This part includes Steps 1-3 of the LDIP
Seven-Step Process.
Part 3: Analysis of Fiscal Capability is the Step 4 of the LDIP
process. It presents the resources of the city and the
projection of funds expected to become available for
investment programming.
Part 4: Implementation Strategies and Policies suggests
various strategies to augment the city’s financial
resources.
5-6
5.2 S ELECTION AND P RIORITIZATION OF
P ROGRAMS /P ROJECTS
7
4. Non-Communicable Prevention and Control Program
5. Health Promotion Program
6. Responsible Parenthood-Family Planning Program
7. Family Health Program
8. Micronutrient Supplementation Program
9. Socialized Housing Program
10. Anti-Squatting Program
11. Anti-Mendicancy Program
12. Local Pantawid
13. Self-Employment Assistance-Kaunlaran (SEA-K)
14. PWD Capacity Building Program
15. Local Social Pension Program for Senior Citizens
16. Senior Citizens Welfare Program
17. Solo Parents Capability Programs
18. Youth Development Program
19. Gender and Development (GAD) Program
20. Values Formation Program
21. ECCD Service/Child Development and Family Support
Program
22. Community-Based Service for Children in Conflict with the
Law (CICL) Diversion Program
23. Women and Children Protection Services
24. Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Facility/Program
5-8
35. Barangay Tourism Programs
5-9
60. Bike/electric bike lanes development project
61. Advanced Traffic Management and Control System project
62. Lazatin Boulevard redevelopment project
63. Dolores Intersection redevelopment and traffic
management project
64. Dolores Intersection Pedestrian overpass (with lift)
development project
65. Street Lighting Project
66. Traffic lights provision, rehabilitation and maintenance
project
67. Spillway and Drainage Development Projects:
68. San Fernando River Dredging project
69. Creeks Total Clean-up Project
70. Local Drainages Rehabilitation Project
71. Collaboration Project with neighboring LGUs to Ensure
Efficacy of the City’s Drainage System
72. Provision of a Spillway Diverting the Surplus Water from
Telabastagan Channel to Maluwalu Creek
73. Utilization of the Siquako Dam (across Calulut Creek) for
flood control
74. Construction of water reservoir (water retarding basin) in
Baliti area
75. Central Evacuation Facility Construction Project in barangay
San Isidro
76. Acquisition of DRR-CCA Training Facilities
77. Information Technology (IT) infrastructure upgrading project
78. Command and Control Center (C3) Development Project
79. Wired and wireless communication systems expansion
project
5-10
84. Construction of San Isidro – Del Rosario Command Center
85. Quick Response and Disaster Impacts Mitigation Program
86. Improvement and Modernization of Fire Prevention and
Protection Program
87. Central Evacuation Facility Program
The goals that were identified cover the five (5) sectoral
objectives of the city: economic, infrastructure, environment,
development administration, and social.
5-11
criteria, and considering the city’s vision. Below were the
weights agreed during the consultation:
5-12
Table 5-3 Ranked GAM Summary (Ranked List of Programs and
Projects), CSFP
PROJECT Sector Technical Working Group (TWG) TOTAL
Physical Social DevAd Econ Envi SCORE
5-13
PROJECT Sector Technical Working Group (TWG) TOTAL
Rehabilitation Project 1.74 2.41 2.12 2.09 2.19 SCORE
10.56
13 Command and Control Center Infra
(C3) Development Project 1.83 2.42 2.20 1.98 2.18 10.61
14 Spillway and Drainage Infra
Development Projects: 1.77 2.44 2.34 1.93 2.18 10.66
15 Dolores Intersection Infra
redevelopment and traffic 1.71 2.22 2.31 1.96 2.17 10.38
management project
16 Aquino by-way improvement Infra
project (Del Rosario to 1.69 2.24 2.28 2.13 2.17 10.51
Calulut)
17 Waterway Clearing Project Envi
1.76 2.40 2.01 1.93 2.17 10.27
18 San Fernando River Dredging Infra
project 1.74 2.44 2.23 1.97 2.17 10.54
19 Improvement and DevAd
Modernization of Fire 1.69 2.48 2.08 2.00 2.16 10.41
Prevention and Protection
Program
20 Anti-Squatting Program Social
1.49 2.42 1.94 2.17 2.16 10.19
21 Central Evacuation Facility DevAd
Program 1.83 2.30 1.99 2.14 2.15 10.41
22 Construction of water Infra
reservoir (water retarding 1.79 2.46 2.16 1.85 2.15 10.41
basin) in Baliti area
23 Water Quality Monitoring Envi
Project 1.76 2.52 1.87 1.90 2.14 10.18
24 Quick Response and Disaster DevAd
Impacts Mitigation Program 1.68 2.38 1.88 2.08 2.14 10.17
25 Barangay Bridges Infra
Rehabilitation/Construction 1.68 2.28 2.22 1.86 2.14 10.19
Project
26 Bike/electric bike lanes Infra
development project 1.68 2.31 2.23 1.92 2.14 10.28
27 Lazatin Boulevard Infra
redevelopment project 1.70 2.22 2.20 1.93 2.14 10.19
5-14
PROJECT Sector Technical Working Group (TWG) TOTAL
28 Central Evacuation Facility Infra SCORE
Construction Project in 1.66 2.58 2.16 1.88 2.13 10.41
barangay San Isidro
29 Street Lighting Project Infra
1.71 2.18 2.27 1.93 2.13 10.22
30 Utilization of the Siquako Dam Infra
(across Calulut Creek) for 1.69 2.19 2.32 1.90 2.12 10.23
flood control
31 Balimbing Road Dike Infra
improvement project 1.64 2.28 2.09 2.04 2.12 10.17
32 Del Rosario road (parallel to Infra
Megadike) construction/ 1.56 2.24 2.13 2.07 2.12 10.12
expansion project
33 Advanced Traffic Infra
Management and Control 1.71 2.19 2.30 1.89 2.10 10.19
System project
34 Magliman-Alasas-Del Rosario Infra
road development project 1.61 2.26 2.04 2.01 2.10 10.01
35 Provision of a Spillway Infra
Diverting the Surplus Water 1.69 2.33 1.94 1.89 2.10 9.94
from Telabastagan Channel to
Maluwalu Creek
36 Intensification of Police Force DevAd
1.34 2.73 2.12 1.90 2.07 10.17
37 Information Technology (IT) Infra
infrastructure upgrading 1.57 2.28 2.10 1.79 2.06 9.81
project
38 Dolores Intersection Infra
Pedestrian overpass (with lift) 1.58 2.22 2.07 1.98 2.06 9.91
development project
39 Comprehensive Septage and Envi
Sewage Management 1.60 2.26 1.70 2.07 2.05 9.68
Program
40 Traffic lights provision, Infra
rehabilitation and 1.73 2.12 2.14 1.86 2.05 9.90
maintenance project
41 Manila Bay Rehabilitation Envi
Program 1.63 2.41 1.65 1.83 2.04 9.57
5-15
PROJECT Sector Technical Working Group (TWG) TOTAL
42 Air Quality Monitoring Project Envi SCORE
1.47 2.44 1.79 1.96 2.04 9.70
43 Construction of San Isidro – DevAd
Del Rosario Command Center 1.72 1.98 1.89 2.16 2.04 9.79
44 Integrated Groundwater Envi
Management Program 1.47 2.39 1.86 1.95 2.03 9.70
45 Acquisition of DRR-CCA Infra
Training Facilities 1.66 2.04 1.99 1.87 1.99 9.55
46 Activation of River Patrols in Envi
Barangays 1.69 2.29 1.44 1.94 1.98 9.34
47 Tricycle and pedicab Infra
terminals development project 1.42 1.96 1.84 2.06 1.95 9.23
48 Sealing of Abondoned Wells Envi
Project 1.30 2.24 1.75 1.82 1.92 9.03
49 Wired and wireless Infra
communication systems 1.50 1.92 1.99 1.78 1.92 9.11
expansion project
50 Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Social
Facility/Program 1.16 2.27 1.80 1.91 1.90 9.04
51 Installation of LED AirQuality Envi
Display Modules Project 1.29 2.35 1.58 1.99 1.90 9.11
52 Faster Transaction Program DevAd
1.41 2.01 1.77 1.80 1.90 8.89
53 Heritage Infrastructure Project Econ
1.22 1.89 1.96 1.70 1.89 8.65
54 Emission Inventory Project Envi
1.36 1.99 1.52 1.85 1.87 8.60
55 Health Promotion Program Social
0.85 2.22 1.81 1.93 1.86 8.66
56 One Town/One Barangay Econ
One Product Project 1.11 1.88 1.99 1.73 1.86 8.56
57 Upgrading and Mainstreaming DevAd
of Data Management System 1.12 1.79 1.84 1.85 1.80 8.41
58 Industry Clustering Econ
Development Program 0.98 1.95 1.69 1.76 1.79 8.17
59 Anti-Mendicancy Program Social
1.00 1.89 1.77 2.03 1.77 8.47
5-16
PROJECT Sector Technical Working Group (TWG) TOTAL
60 Capacity Building and Skills DevAd SCORE
Development Program 0.91 1.86 1.90 1.68 1.73 8.09
61 Lantern Decoration Project/ Econ
Shining Star Project 0.75 1.94 1.66 1.71 1.73 7.79
62 Family Health Program Social
0.97 1.91 1.73 1.72 1.72 8.06
63 Farmers Econ
Assembly/Information 1.08 1.77 1.58 1.70 1.70 7.82
Dissemination Program
64 Women and Children Social
Protection Center 0.93 1.80 1.53 1.83 1.70 7.79
65 Barangay Tourism Programs Econ
0.93 1.80 1.77 1.67 1.68 7.85
66 Alternative Learning System/ Social
Non-formal Education 1.11 1.79 1.46 1.61 1.65 7.63
Program
67 Non-Communicable Social
Prevention and Control 0.81 1.82 1.39 1.78 1.65 7.44
Program
68 Creation Of Visitor’s Bureau Econ
And Tourism Network 0.87 1.79 1.72 1.52 1.65 7.54
69 Farmer Field School Project Econ
0.95 1.32 1.68 1.69 1.64 7.27
70 PWD Capacity Building Social
Program 0.75 1.68 1.60 1.83 1.63 7.50
71 CSFP Tourism Star Card Econ
0.71 1.61 1.64 1.70 1.63 7.30
72 City Tourism Branding Project Econ
0.89 1.82 1.58 1.67 1.63 7.59
73 Cultural Promotion And Econ
Development Program 0.99 1.65 1.67 1.64 1.63 7.58
74 Responsible Parenthood- Social
Family Planning Program 0.95 1.69 1.59 1.72 1.59 7.55
75 Community-Based Service for Social
Children in Conflict with the 0.96 1.80 1.48 1.70 1.58 7.52
Law (CICL) Diversion
Program
76 Values Formation Program Social
5-17
PROJECT Sector Technical Working Group (TWG) TOTAL
0.88 1.87 1.35 1.70 1.57 SCORE
7.36
77 Self-Employment Assistance- Social
Kaunlaran (SEA-K) 0.74 1.53 1.43 1.83 1.56 7.09
78 Scholarship for Poor But Social
Deserving Students 1.06 1.54 1.48 1.48 1.56 7.11
79 Micronutrient Social
Supplementation Program 0.66 1.66 1.37 1.76 1.53 6.99
80 Youth Development Program Social
0.75 1.54 1.62 1.54 1.52 6.98
81 ECCD Service/Child Social
Development and Family 0.80 1.65 1.46 1.60 1.48 6.99
Support Program
82 Local Pantawid Social
0.81 1.35 1.43 1.76 1.47 6.82
83 Supplemental Feeding in Social
Elementary Schools 0.97 1.64 1.05 1.63 1.44 6.73
84 Senior Citizens Welfare Social
Program 0.71 1.48 1.30 1.76 1.42 6.67
85 Local Social Pension Program Social
for Senior Citizens 0.71 1.34 1.34 1.68 1.40 6.46
86 Gender and Development Social
(GAD) Program 0.71 1.13 1.45 1.60 1.37 6.25
87 Solo Parents Capability Social
Programs 0.71 1.08 1.33 1.61 1.34 6.07
5-18
On the other hand, Table 2-4 shows the classification of projects
into “hard”, “soft”, or “hard and soft”. As the table indicates,
there are 39 hard PPs, 3 hard and soft PPs, and 45 soft PPs.
5-19
PROJECT Category Sector COST (PhP)
5-20
PROJECT Category Sector COST (PhP)
5-21
PROJECT Category Sector COST (PhP)
5-22
PROJECT Category Sector COST (PhP)
5-23
5.3 A NALYSIS OF F ISCAL C APABILITY
5-25
3.2.1 E XPENDI TURE B Y O BJECT
Among expenditure items, the General Public Services received
the biggest share of CSFP’s budget for three (3) consecutive
years 2013 – 2015 with an average share of 48.97 percent. The
Social Services item followed with expenditure share averaging
31.75 percent while economic services, with an average of
19.29 percent emanates last.
5-26
Table 5-8. CSFP’s Actual Expenditure by General Account, 2013 - 2015
General Account 2013 % 2014 % 2015 %
(in million Share (in million Share (in million Share
Php) Php) Php)
5-27
5.3.4 C OMPARISON OF I NCOME AND
E XPENDITURE
Table 3-6 shows that the revenues generated by the City of San
Fernando from 2013 – 2015 increased annually. The revenue
received in 2014 posed an 18 percent increase from the 2013
revenue. However, in 2015 the increase slowed down to only
about 10 percent from the previous year. In terms of CSFP’s
expenditure pattern, 2014 spending showed a four (4) percent
decline from the 2013 spending then shoots again by 11
percent in 2015. The rate of increase in the expenditure pattern
of the city was outweighed by the rate of increase in the
revenue generated for the years 2014 and 2015; thus, surpluses
were recorded on the said periods. Approximately, revenue of
CSFP grew at an average of 14 percent while expenditures
grew only at an average of three (3) percent for the last 3 years.
5-28
was also calculated for each of the years in projection. The net
operating surplus constitutes the financing potential of the city
for new public service investments before deducting
expenditures for debt service and appropriations for calamity
fund of five (5) percent. The net amount after deductions is
matched with the capital and current expenditure requirement
of the proposed programs and projects.
5-29
bonds or through joint venture and BOT-type
arrangements; and,
Re-allocating funds from the operating budget to the
investment budget.
5-30
5.4 I MPLEMENTATION S TRATEGIES AND P OLICIES
Local government units (LGUs) can utilize various tools and
mechanisms to effectively and efficiently deliver goods and
services to the communities. These tools also provide a cushion
to LGUs in scenarios where investment requirements exceed the
available resources. The various legislative provisions that serve
as basis for LGUs to competently execute their mandated
functions are also provided in this chapter.
5-32
1. L A N D -B AS E D T OO L S
1 An LGU may acquire and develop land using its ordinary corporate power (Sec. 18), though purchase of foreclosed real properti es
(Sec 263) or through joint ventures (Sec. 302) with the private sector, or through build-operate-transfer (BOT) scheme. Such
investment in land development provides direct revenues to the LGUs in terms of profits upon disposition and also in terms of
enhanced property value and higher property tax base.
5-33
Fishery Rentals, Fees and Charges (Sec. 149); and,
Service Fees and Charges (Sec. 153).
3. I N FRA S T RU CT U RE -B A S E D T OO LS
4. D E BT -B A S E D T OO LS
These are tools that allow LGUs to secure debt finance for so
called “income-generating projects” (IGP) and to make
investment in financial debt instruments like securities (e.g.,
Treasury bills, commercial papers, and shares of stock).
5. R E VE NU E S HA RING -B A S E D T O OL S
2 Members of the House of Representatives as well as members of the Senate are allocated funds that may allocate for
development projects within their respective districts or in the case of the Senators, in any location within the country tha t they may
so choose. Congressional funds have both “hard” and “soft” components. The i nfrastructure funds are for identified hard capital
projects such as roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, etc while the Priority Development Assistance Funds (PDAF) are for soft type
projects such as medical expenses of indigent patients or for scholarships.
5-34
The Administrative Code of 1987 provides that: “The State shall
ensure the autonomy of local governments. For this purpose, it
shall provide for a more responsive and accountable local
government structure instituted through a system of
decentralization. The allocation of powers and resources to
local government units shall be promoted and inter-local
government grouping, consolidation and coordination of
resources shall be encouraged.” (Book III, Title XII, Chapter 1,
Section 1, Administrative Code of 1987).
BUDGETING
LGUs should not waste their “IRA boon”, but instead leverage
their IRA to finance strategic income generating and revenue-
anticipating capital investment projects.
5-35
Schematically presented in Figure 4-1 are the possible options
that may be explored by City of San Fernando (P) to augment
its locally generated resources.
Government Private
Financing
Institutions
and,
d) It must contain a grant element of at least twenty-five
percent (25%).
5-36
Official development assistances (ODAs) are resource flows
provided by the following bilateral sources and multilateral
institutions with the objective of promoting the economic
development and welfare of the recipient country, to wit:
Bilateral Donors
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Italy
Japan
Korea, South
Kuwait
Netherlands, The
New Zealand
Norway
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
United States of America
Multilateral Donors
5-37
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
United Nations Industrial Development Organization
(UNIDO)
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)
World Bank, The
ODA may either take the form of soft loans or grants. Soft loans
have interest rates, which may range from zero to seven
percent, and maturity periods ranging from 10 to 50 years and
grace periods of five to 10 years. ODA grants, on the other
hand, have no repayment obligations and are mainly provided
in the form of experts, consultancy services, equipment,
commodities and training.
1. C RE DIT M A RK E T O PT IO NS
b. Bond Floatation.
3
Annex F, Guidelines on PLPEM, Volume 3
5-38
The nature of the project to be financed and its financial
circumstances must be given in-depth evaluation before
entering into the abovementioned modes of credit financing.
B. F A S T E R T RAN S A CT IO N P RO G RA M
5-39
Capacity building of CPDO, other city departments and
concerned stakeholders shall be improved and strengthened in
order to ensure awareness of the project development process.
This is deemed necessary in selecting certain PPAs that are for
immediate implementation as provided in the Annual
Investment Program (AIP) of the City. The AIP is the annual slice
of the LDIP which indicates the yearly expenditure requirements
of the City and thus forms part of its annual budget.
4 www.searchcio.techtarget.com
5-40
Project implementation by LGUs involves two approaches either
by contract or administration. Local officials and personnel shall
be deemed capable and responsible for whichever approach
is undertaken. Hence, provision of training and seminars for all
local planning staff is necessary to improve their capability in
project development, contract administration, monitoring, and
evaluation.
5-41
ANNEX A: LIST OF PROJECT BRIEFS
No. Project Title Duration Total Cost (Php) in Lead
6 years Implementing
Agency
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
1 Supplemental Feeding in Elementary Schools 2017-2022 10,200,000.00 CHO, DepEd
(continuing)
Reduction of prevalence of malnutrition among elementary
school children through the conduct of supplemental
feeding.
2 Alternative Learning System/ Non-formal Education 2017-2022 5,400,000.00 DepEd
Program (continuing)
Other Programs
-Provision of certified/Hybrid Seed
-Organic Agriculture
-Operation and Maintenance of Organic Trading Post
26 Farmer Field School Project 2017-2022 3,000,000.00 Department of
16 weeks/ 4 Agriculture, Office
Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Project is a non-formal farmer months of the Provincial
education known as “Paaralang Walang Dingding” that is (annually) Agriculturist and
based on experimental learning techniques and LGU-City
participatory method. It is a 16 weeks non- formal Agriculture and
education held in the farm with at least 25 farmer Veterinary Office
participants who are willing to learn about the new package
of technologies which are usually done through
participatory approach, actual demonstration, field
experiences, sharing of ideas, investigation, monitoring,
record keeping, etc. The output of the project is that
farmers will learn and be able to choose between good and
bad agricultural practices. FFS is a practical way of
delivering services among farmers.
27 Industry Clustering Development Program 2017 720,000.00 City Investment
continuing and Promotion
This program will be able to provide technical support and program Office/Department
strengthen the capabilities of the Clustered Industry by of Trade and
assisting them in terms of Training and Seminar in Industry/
entrepreneurship, GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices), Department of
Benchmarking and Capability Building, Marketing and Science and
Promotion and Product Development (Packaging and Technology
Labeling).
Proposed 6 Clustered Industries:
1.Furniture and Furnishing (a. Wood/Bamboo, b.
Steel, c. Mixed used)
2. Processed Food (a. Delicacies,b. Veg, Fruits and
Nuts, c. Ice Cream,d. Processed Meat, e.
Pastries and Sweets)
3. Gift Decors, House wares and Accessories (a.
Woodcraft,b. Basket,c. Bags,d. Water
Hyacinth,e. Fashion Accessories,f. Decorative
Items,g. Crocket,h. Curtains and Bed sheet,i.
Paper machete,j. Housewares)
4. Lantern and Lights (a. Christmas Lanterns,b. Lamp
Shades,c. Decorative Lanterns)
5. Organic and Agri-products(a. Organics Products,b.
Non–Organic Products)
6. Health & Wellness (a. Essential Oils,b. All purpose
liquid soap/soap,c. Massage/Spa centers,d.
Juices)
28 One Town/One Barangay One Product Project 2017-2022 3,000,000.00 LGU- Investment
(continuing Promotion Office/
program) DTI
One Barangay-One Product Program was crafted from the
One Town –One Product Program of the Department of
Trade and Industry. Through this program, the City aims to
maintain and develop product to each 35 barangays in our
city. The program will give chance to the constituents in
their livelihood by building them as entrepreneurs. The
scope of the projects will be from the how to start , access
to finance, access market, develop their products and also
training in preparation for the ASEAN integration. This
project will prioritize those PWD’s, 4P’s, out of school
youth’s and all those drug related victims as beneficiaries.
29 Lantern Decoration Project/ Shining Star Project 2017-2022 51,000,000 City Tourism
Promotion of City’s lantern by displaying their crafts within Office
the
-Giant Lantern Festival (in partnership with Giant Lantern
Festival Foundation)
30 Heritage Infrastructure Project 2017-2022 72,000,000 City Tourism
Office and CEO
The City envisions itself to be the Center for Kapampangan
Culture. To achieve this vision, the City should restore and
develop its existing historical structures. Among these are
the City Hall, Baluyut Bridge and Train Station. The City
Hall will be converted into a heritage center. The Baluyut
Bridge will be restored to its original structure as the first
concrete pavement. A curatorial plan is being designed for
the restoration of the San Fernando Train Station. This
includes the installation of two and three-dimensional art,
construction of walls or other architectural components,
security devices, to name a few.
Statues are erected to show that the City has a past worth
memorializing. The life-size monument of Ninoy Aquino will
be placed at the Heroes Park to replace the current statue
which is already deteriorating. The three local figures,
Sotero Baluyut, Antonio Consunji and Levi Panlilio have
great contributions in our local history. Thus, the City
Government would like to recognize their heroism by
putting up their bust monuments where they are significant.
Components
-Preserving Heritage for Progress Program
-Organization of Festivals and Events
-Improvement of heroes park, Heroes Hall, Lazatin Blvd., 2017 5,000,000.00
San Juan, CSFP
-Provision of Monument @ Heroes Parks, CSFP. 2017 1,000,000.00
-Tourism Infrastructure- CSFP. Entrance Arches 2017 1,000,000.00
-Rehabilitation of Cultural/Historical Sites 5,000,000.00
31 CSFP Tourism Star Card (be replaced by TOURISM 2017 – 312,290.00 City Tourism
PROMOTIONS PROGRAM) continuing Office and CEO
program
This service road will travel north to south and vice versa,
following the path of the NLEX road in San Fernando. It will
also be parallel to McArthur Highway, servicing travellers at
the eastern part of the City. The road is another proposed
solution to decongest traffic in McArthur Highway.
Phase 1
-Improvement/Construction of Sidewalk along Poblacion 2017 5,000,000.00
Area, Sto. Rosario, CSFP.
-Construction of Covered Sidewalk at Heroes Hall, San
Juan, CSFP.
73 Utilization of the Siquako Dam (across Calulut Creek) for 2017-2022 20,000,000.00
flood control
Status/Progress
Status/Progress
To be established.
Status/Progress
84 Construction of San Isidro – Del Rosario Command Center 2017-2022 200,000,000.00 for CEO and CPDCO
Infrastructure development is a vital component in for the full the development of
encouraging a country’s economic growth. For realization the land.
developed countries, infrastructure support has a of the
planned
crucial role as a multiplier, enabling further
civic center.
development and allowing governments to achieve
social, economic and political claims. The role of
infrastructure for developing countries, however, goes
deeper as being the catalyst of development in
undeveloped communities, which comprise the
majority of a nation, by aiding in the provision of
services to households and industries.
Status/Progress
Land already purchased.
85 Quick Response and Disaster Impacts Mitigation Program 2017-2022 600,000,000.00 CDRRMD,
Community resiliency in the locality is essential to prevent CAdminO, OSP
casualties in life and property, especially in identified and CPDCO
disaster prone areas. The CSFP has flood hazard areas
due to it being at the lower parts of the Pampanga River
Basin. Disaster Impacts Mitigation and Quick response
program must encompass engineering techniques for
mitigating infrastructures and hazard-resistant construction
as well as improved environmental policies and public
awareness.
Status/Progress
Ongoing/Continuing
Components
-Pandemic/Epidemic/Emerging/Reemerging/INfectious
Diseases Mitigation Program
-Prepositioning of Goods
Status/Progress
Ongoing
Status/Progress
Not yet started. Land for the location already
purchased.
2017 22,200,000.00
89 Proposed tourism road in San Isidro-Del Rosario Area as 2018-2020 20,000,000.00 CEO w/ DPWH
access road for the Civic Center
90 Proposed entrance road to Dela Paz Sur 2017-2018 10,000,000.00 CEO
LGU Services
108 Legislative Researches (Continuing Program) 2017-2022 21,600,000.00 City Vice Mayor’s
Office
109 Information Campaigns on Government Services 2017-2022 19,758,000.00 City Treasurer’s
(Continuing Programs) Office, CCRO,
CLO, CEO/LBOD
110 Organizational Competitiveness Program (Continuing 2017-2022 134,460,000.00 CHRDO
Program)
-Incentive Program
-Benefits Program
111 Proper Inventory and Legal Documentation of City 2017-2022 180,000,000.00 CGSO
Government Real Properties (Continuing Program)
-Proper Registration and Insurance of City’s Properties
-Research and Survey/Titling of CG Properties
-Improvement of warehousing system and Motorpool
facilities
-Preventive/corrective maintenance of City Vehicles and
Equipment
-Motorpool management systems
112 Centralized Records Management Programs (Continuing 2017-2022 21,000,000.00 CGSO
Program)
-Compliance to RA 94701 or the Archiving Policy
-Maintenance and Preservation of Public Records
-Proper utilization of Supplies and Equipment
113 General Services to LGU and Public Properties (Continuing 2017-2022 300,000,000.00 CGSO
Program)
-Improvement of Security Services
-Pests and Termites Control Program
-Improvement/beautification of City’s Landmarks and
roundabouts
-Improvement of garbage collection and disposal system
-Improvement of Janitorial Services
114 Investment Promotion Programs (Continuing Program) 2017-2022 48,000,000 IPO
-Investment Promotion and Negosyo Center
-Organization of Investment and Incentive Board/SMED
Council
-Business Roving Academy/Counseling
-Investment Promotion Representation Project
-Trade Missions
-Media Advertisements/CSFP Packaging and Labeling
Room
115 Transparency and Accountability Programs (Continuing 2017-2022 7,100,000.00 City Treasurer’s
Program) Office
-Safeguarding of LGU assets and accountabilities
-Data and Property Records Management
116 Revenue Generation Programs (Continuing Program) 2017-2022 18,470,000.00 City Treasurer’s
-Public Auction and Legal Action for Delinquent Accounts Office, City
-Taxpayers’ Saturation Drive Assessor’s Office
-Consultative Meetings and Dialogue
-Real Property Tax Advocacy
-General Revision of all Real Property Assessments
112 Agriculture and Veterinary Programs (Continuing Program) 2017-2022 129,360,000.00 CAVO
-Food Sustainability Programs
-Animal Disease Eradication Programs
-Consumer Protection Program and Meat Safety
-Farm Mechanization Programs
Subtotal for LGU Services 4,077,745,000.00
Rehabilitation/Development/Co
200,000,000
nstruction of Camarin A and B
of the New Public Market, Del
Pilar, CSFP.
Infrastructure Projects
-This includes the construction
and repairs of multi purpose hall
and barangay halls across 35
barangays of the city
Other Infrastructure Support 51,000,000 10,200,000 10,200,000 10,200,000 10,200,000 10,200,000 CEO
Services