Please Forward To The Direct Attention of Us Attorney General - The Honorable William Barr

Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.
com>
PLEASE FORWARD TO THE DIRECT ATTENTION OF US ATTORNEY

GENERAL - THE HONORABLE WILLIAM BARR
Mohan Harihar <[email protected]> Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 4:04 PM
To: theresa watson3 <[email protected]>
Cc: NewYorkComplaints Dojoig <[email protected]>, andrew lelling
<[email protected]>, mary murrane <[email protected]>, christina sterling
<[email protected]>
Dear Attorney General Barr,
As you know, I've now updated the US District Court and specifically - Chief Judge Saris on the
severity of unresolved legal issues (beginning with jurisdiction) that still remain with HARIHAR v THE
UNITED STATES (Docket No. 15-cv-11109) and the related Federal litigation. You are also aware
that I have informed the Court that The Department of Justice and The Executive Office of the
President have yet to answer whether there is interest in having a mutual agreement discussion. I
respectfully ask that you provide a timely response as to whether there is interest in having such a
discussion. Please be advised that the White House will also receive a copy of this email (via
www.whitehouse.gov), as I believe it is important to include the EOP in any potential discussion.
I sincerely hope that we are able to begin a productive dialogue in the coming days - that ultimately
leads to a legal agreement that is mutually beneficial. However, if there is no interest in having a
mutual agreement discussion, please advise so that I can update the Court in timely fashion. Thank
you for your consideration. I look forward to your response.
Respectfully,
Mohan A. Harihar
Plaintiff – Pro Se
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
[email protected]
1
Mohan Harihar <[email protected]>
A LETTER TO US DISTRICT COURT CHIEF JUDGE – THE HON. PATTI B.

SARIS
Mohan Harihar <[email protected]> Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 3:03 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected], "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, elizabeth warren <[email protected]>,
sydney levin-epstein <[email protected]>, lori trahan
<[email protected]>, ayanna pressley <[email protected]>, NewYorkComplaints
Dojoig <[email protected]>, theresa watson3 <[email protected]>, andrew
lelling <[email protected]>, mary murrane <[email protected]>, christina sterling
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], david fialkow <[email protected]>, "Jeffrey B. Loeb"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], "Murphy,
Matthew T." <[email protected]>, Nora Keefe <[email protected]>, Nairoby
Gabriel <[email protected]>
A LETTER TO US DISTRICT COURT CHIEF JUDGE – THE HON. PATTI B. SARIS
September 25, 2019
The Honorable Patti B. Saris

Chief Judge – District of Massachusetts
John Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse
1 Courthouse Way
Boston, MA 02210
Phone: (617) 748-9175
RE: CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED
Dear Chief Judge Saris:
Before bringing to your attention my concerns, I respectfully preface this letter by stating that a
new complaint is being prepared for filing in the US Court of Federal Claims - against The
United States. This new complaint evidences failures in all three (3) branches of both State and
Federal government, all documented by court record. The most glaring of which are the systemic
judicial failures in the First Circuit (District and Appellate Courts) and includes The Supreme
2
Court of The United States (SCOTUS).1 With the assistance of social media (and out of concerns
for my personal safety and security), these referenced government failures have been regularly
evidenced in full public view for over eight (8) years - all of which are associated with the
following Federal (Civil) Complaints:
1. HARIHAR v US BANK et al - Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752, Appeal No. 17-1381,

Lower Court Docket No. 15-cv-11880;
2. HARIHAR v THE UNITED STATES - Appeal No. 17-2074, Lower Court Docket No.
17-cv11109; and
3. HARIHAR v CHIEF JUDGE JEFFREY R HOWARD et al, Docket No. 18-cv-11134
The Nation (as well as the Global community) is taking notice, as the referenced litigation
(above) is now recognized as the largest and most egregious abuse of judicial power in US
history. As Chief Judge, you are aware that the severity of evidenced violations involving
referenced Judicial Officers and other officers of the Court include (but are not limited to): (1)
Judicial TREASON, pursuant to ARTICLE III and 18 U.S. CODE § 2381 for ruling after
jurisdiction had been lost; (2) The repeated refusal to uphold numerous Federal Rules, including
(but not limited to) the Plaintiff’s UNOPPOSED Fraud on the Court (and other) claims
under Fed. R. Civ. P 60(b); (3) Economic Espionage under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1831; (4) RICO
violations (Civil and Criminal); (5) Due Process/Color of Law violations and matters which
are perceived to impact National Security. The Plaintiff’s efforts to report Judicial misconduct
have revealed a failed process within the First Circuit – including the Office of the First Circuit
Executive for addressing judicial misconduct, making it necessary to regularly update: (1) The
White House; (2) Members of Congress; (3) Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA); (4) The
DOJ; and (5) the Administrative Office of US Courts.
Three (3) of the most recent failures evidenced as a matter of record by this Court and the
Office of the First Circuit Executive include (but are not limited to) the following:
1
References Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752, filed with The United States Supreme Court.
3
I. RECUSED US District Court Judge – the Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs2 - who just
weeks ago issued two (2) orders without jurisdiction associated with the Federal (Civil)
Complaint, HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880.3 Please be advised, a
review of the 8/5/19 VOID order shows that Judge Burroughs has – as a matter of record
threatened to bring sanctions against Plaintiff – Mohan A. Harihar, should he continue
to report judicial misconduct including evidenced acts of TREASON against The
United States of America.
II. Systemic Failures Evidenced by the Office of the First Circuit Executive - In a letter
dated August 21, 2019, the Plaintiff was informed that he is no longer ALLOWED to
report evidenced claims of judicial misconduct – including evidenced TREASON against
The United States of America.4
III. Order Issued WITHOUT Jurisdiction by the Hon. Denise J. Casper – The Plaintiff
references the following court document he received by US mail on Saturday, September
14, 2019 (Referencing HARIHAR v THE UNITED STATES, Docket No. 17-cv-11109),
which stated:
“Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying as moot22 Motion to

Amend Complaint. Given D. 14,15, prior dismissal of complaint, Court of Appeals
affirming same over a year ago, D. 207, there is no complaint to amend and this case
remains closed. (Hourihan, Lisa)”5
In the Plaintiff’s original motion, the Court is respectfully reminded that US District Court
Judge – Hon. Denise J. Casper had already LOST jurisdiction to rule further in this or
ANY related litigation, for the SAME IDENTICAL reasons that brought the sua sponte
recusal of the Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs. The Plaintiff’s RESPONSE to the VOID
Order by Judge Casper was entered onto the docket - 9/18/19 [ECF No. 24].
2
See Exhibit 1 – to view the 06/19/17 sua sponte Recusal Order issued by the US District Court Judge – Allison
Dale Burroughs.
3
See Exhibit 2 - On July 29, 2019, US District Court Judge – Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs issued an order
WITHOUT JURISDICTION, denying the Plaintiff’s Motion [Ref. ECF No. 157]. On August 5, 2019, a second
VOID order was issued without jurisdiction [Ref. ECF No. 158]. Both of these actions are interpreted as clear
(and incremental) violations to ARTICLE III and 18 U.S. CODE § 2381 - JUDICIAL TREASON.
4
See Exhibit 3
5
See Exhibit 4
4
The Plaintiff respectfully requests that your Honor assist with addressing these unresolved issues,
beginning with jurisdiction as the referenced judicial officers are no longer allowed to rule over
these dockets.6 Once jurisdiction has been restored, the Plaintiff respectfully calls for this Court to
address and VOID all orders that have been issued by judicial officers who clearly lack
jurisdiction.
Next, the Plaintiff respectfully informs your Honor that the Plaintiff has in Good Faith, extended
an offer(s) to reach a mutual agreement(s) with ALL parties (including the Defendants –
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and THE UNITED STATES) in the
referenced civil complaints. So far, Bank Defendants – WELLS FARGO and US BANK have
expressed an interest in having a mutual agreement discussion, as have Defendants – Jeffrey and
Isabelle Perkins. However, there has yet to be any approved agreement. The Plaintiff is still
waiting for responses from US Attorney General – William Barr and Massachusetts AG
Maura Healey. All remaining defendants have either declined the Plaintiff’s mutual agreement
offer or their timeline for response has since expired.
Based on the Plaintiff’s interpretation of the law – IF a Defendant party(s) were to successfully
reach a mutual agreement with the Plaintiff, there would no longer be a need to proceed further
with the CIVIL portions of the complaint against them, as they would likely be perceived as
moot. Related CRIMINAL and PROFFESIONAL complaints of record however, would remain
unresolved, requiring the attention of this Court, the DOJ, the Board of BAR Overseers/BAR
council and the National Association of Realtors (NAR).
Subsequently, any Defendant party who chooses NOT to enter into a mutual agreement discussion
with the Plaintiff – the corrective path to judgement is quite clear. At minimum, a DEFAULT
judgement in favor of the Plaintiff with prejudice MUST result from the UNOPPOSED Rule
60(b)(3) – FRAUD UPON THE COURT claim(s). Based on the Plaintiff’s interpretation of the
law, if the Court fails to initiate corrective action, the Plaintiff will have again shown cause to
6
In HARIHAR v HOWARD et al (Docket No. 18-cv-11134), the presiding US District Court Judge – the Hon.
William G. Young has similarly exemplified for the record the same patterns of corrupt conduct as Judge’s
Burroughs and Casper. Therefore, Judge Young has also lost jurisdiction and the dismissal order associated with this
docket is too, considered VOID.
5
amend his original complaint against the Defendant - The United States. The Plaintiff remains
hopeful that mutual agreements will be made with ALL parties that are: (1) mutually
beneficial; (2) constructive; and (3) which contribute to the overall benefit of the
Commonwealth and our great Nation.
Please be advised, the referenced litigation is related to a new complaint now being prepared
for filing in The United States Court of Federal Claims; and includes matters perceived to
impact National Security. Therefore, the following government offices/agencies/committees will
necessarily receive copies of this formal letter (via email, US Mail and/or social media):
1. President Donald J. Trump (via www.whitehouse.gov)7;

2. US Secret Service;
3. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS);
4. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC);
5. Office of the US Inspector General (OIG) - specifically, IG Michael Horowitz;
6. Department of Justice (DOJ) - specifically, US Attorney General, William Barr;
7. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);
8. Administrative Office of US Courts - specifically, Director James C. Duff;
9. House/Senate Judiciary Committees;
10. Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA);
11. US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA);
12. US Senator Ed Markey (D-MA);
13. US Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA);
14. US Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (D-MA);
Copies of this Letter will separately: (1) be included in a NOTICE filed with the Court; (2) be
delivered via email communication to the Court Clerk; and (3) will also be made available to the
Public and to media outlets nationwide for documentation purposes and out of continued
concerns for the Plaintiff’s personal safety and security. If your Honor has ANY questions
regarding any portion of this letter, or requires additional information, the Plaintiff is happy to
7
See Exhibit 5 to review to the email confirmation of receipt from the White House.
6
provide upon request. The Plaintiff is grateful for your Honor’s consideration of this very serious,
and sensitive matter.
Respectfully submitted this 25th Day of September, 2019
Mohan A. Harihar
Plaintiff – Pro Se
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
[email protected]
7
Exhibit 1
8
9
Exhibit 2
10
11
Exhibit 3
12
13
Exhibit 4
14
15
Exhibit 5
16
17

Please Forward To The Direct Attention of Us Attorney General - The Honorable William Barr

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Please Forward To The Direct Attention of Us Attorney General - The Honorable William Barr

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Please Forward To The Direct Attention of Us Attorney General - The Honorable William Barr

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.

PLEASE FORWARD TO THE DIRECT ATTENTION OF US ATTORNEY

Dear Attorney General Barr,

A LETTER TO US DISTRICT COURT CHIEF JUDGE – THE HON. PATTI B.

A LETTER TO US DISTRICT COURT CHIEF JUDGE – THE HON. PATTI B. SARIS

September 25, 2019

The Honorable Patti B. Saris

RE: CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED

Dear Chief Judge Saris:

1. HARIHAR v US BANK et al - Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752, Appeal No. 17-1381,

“Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying as moot22 Motion to

impact National Security. Therefore, the following government offices/agencies/committees will

1. President Donald J. Trump (via www.whitehouse.gov)7;

and sensitive matter.

Respectfully submitted this 25th Day of September, 2019

You might also like