Outline of Philippine Insurance Code RA10607
Outline of Philippine Insurance Code RA10607
Outline of Philippine Insurance Code RA10607
CORRO
An Outline of the Insurance Code
Republic Act No. 10607 (Amending Presidential Decree 612)
1. Definition of Insurance
Insurance is a kind of contract that does not guarantee that nothing will happen but guarantee
to protect certain things such as indemnification (value of what might be lost).1
Economic Definition- Insurance is a method which reduces risk by a transfer and combination
(or “pooling”) of uncertainty in regard to financial loss;
Business definition- A plan by which large numbers of people associate themselves and transfer
to the shoulders of all, risks that attach to individuals.
Social Definition – A social device whereby the uncertain risks of individuals may be combined in
a group and thus made more certain, with small periodic contributions by the individuals
providing a fund out of which those who suffer losses may be reimbursed.
It is a plan by which the losses of the few are paid out of the contributions of all members of a
group.2
Aside from the essential requisites of an ordinary contract such as consent, subject matter and
consideration an insurance contract must have the following elements
1. The insured possesses an interest of some kind susceptible of pecuniary estimation, known
as insurable interest
2. The insured is subject to a risk of loss through the destruction or impairment of that
interest by the happening of designated perils
3. The insurer assumes that risk of loss
4. Such assumption is part of a general scheme to distribute actual losses among a large
group of persons bearing somewhat similar risks
1
Notes; June 13, 2018
2
De Leon, De Leon Jr., The Insurance Code of the Philippine Annotated, 2010 Edition p. 16
3
Sec. 2 (a) RA 10607
4
De Leon, De Leon Jr., The Insurance Code of the Philippine Annotated, 2010 Edition, p. 15 citing Vance, op. cit,
p.83
5. As consideration for the insurer’s promise, the insured makes a ratable contribution, called
premium, to a general insurance fund5
“The consent of the spouse is not necessary for the validity of an insurance policy taken
out by a married person on his or her life or that of his or her children.
“All rights, title and interest in the policy of insurance taken out by an original owner on
the life or health of the person insured shall automatically vest in the latter upon the
death of the original owner, unless otherwise provided for in the policy.
5
Perez, The Insurance Code and Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010, 6 th ed. 2014, p.20
ex. insurance taken by the owner of a car against damage and injury he may
cause while operating said car, is an insurance against liability
Said risks may be insured against events which are contingent or unknown,
whether past or future. 6
(1) In general – Anything that has an appreciable pecuniary value, which is subject
to loss or deterioration or of which one may be deprived so that his pecuniary
interest is or may be prejudiced, ay properly constitute the subject matter of
insurance.
(2) Property Insurance – Both persons and property may be subjects of insurance,
but the term “subject matter’ is ordinarily used in reference to the insurance
property. The property covered by a policy is regarded the subject matter of the
insurance, but it is apparent that in the last analysis, it is the risk of loss of such
property that is primarily involved.
(3) Life, health and accident insurance – While it is true that in life, health, or
accident insurance the person becomes the subject of insurance, the matter is
generally viewed as one in reference to the insured as a party to the contract.
(4) Casualty Insurance – In Insurance (not following within the scope of the other
types of insurance) against perils which may affect the person and/ or property
of the insured and give rise to liability on his party to pay damages to others,
the subject matter is the risks involved in use, or the insured’s risk of loss or
liability that he may suffer loss or be compelled to indemnify for the loss
suffered by a third person.
A married woman may take out an insurance on her life or that of her children
without the consent of her husband (sec. 3, par. 2), or that of her husband, she
having an insurable interest in the latter. (see Sec. 10.) She may also take out
insurance on her paraphernal or separate property, or on property given to her
by her husband.910
6
Perez, The Insurance Code and Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010, 6th ed. 2014, p.29
7
De Leon, De Leon Jr., The Insurance Code of the Philippine Annotated, 2010 Edition p.62-63
8
Insurance Code Sec. 3, par.2
9
Harding v. Comm. Union Assurance Co., 38 Phil. 464 [1918]; see Art. 39, Civil Code; Arts. 110, 111, Family Code
[Exec. Order No. 209])
10
De Leon, De Leon Jr., The Insurance Code of the Philippine Annotated, 2010 Edition p.64
iii. Insurance by minors
Any minor of the age of eighteen years or more, may notwithstanding such
minority, contract for life, health and accident insurance, with any insurance
company duly authorized to do business in the Philippines, provided the insurance is
taken on his own life and the beneficiary appointed is the minor’s estate or the
minor’s father, mother, husband, wife, child, brother or sister.11
(1) Life, health, or accident insurance- Under Section 3 (par. 3), a minor may enter
into a valid contract of insurance provided that:
(a) He is 18 year of age or over;
(b) The contract is for life, health, or accident insurance
(c) The insurance is taken on his life; and
(d) The beneficiary (the person designated receive the proceeds of
the insurance upon the happening of the vent insured against)
is any of those enumerated.12
(2) Other insurance – A contract of insurance other than life, health, or accident
insurance, such as fire or marine insurance, entered into by a minor is not
entirely void. It is one which is merely voidable , that is, it is valid until annulled
in a proper action in court by the minor or his legal representative (Art. 1390,
Civil Code)
If the contract is not disaffirmed by the minor, the insurer cannot escape liability
by pleading minority as a defense because “persons who are capable cannot
allege the incapacity of those with whom they contracted.” (Art. 1397)
But if the contract is fair and no fraud or undue influence was practiced by the
insurer, the minor cannot recover the premiums paid, if he cannot return the
benefits received (Arts 1385, 1241, par. 1, 1427, ibid.; Johnson vs. Northwester
Mut L. Ins Co. , 59 N.W. 992913
11
Sec. 3, par. 3 Insurance Code
12
De Leon, De Leon Jr., The Insurance Code of the Philippine Annotated, 2010 Edition p.64
13
De Leon, De Leon Jr., The Insurance Code of the Philippine Annotated, 2010 Edition p.65
14
Insurance Code Sec. 6, RA 10607
3. The beneficiary- one who receives a benefit or advantage or who is entitled to the
benefit of contract; that is, the one to whom the insurance is payable or who is entitled
to the proceeds of the policy on the occurrence of the event designated.15
The term insurer, Is synonymous with the term “assurer” or “underwriter”. The
insurance company is sometimes called “underwriter”.17
15
Perez, The Insurance Code and Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010, 6 th ed. 2014, p.33, citing
Couch 2d. 489.
16
Sec. 190 of the Insurance Code, Republic Act No. 10607
17
De Leon, De Leon Jr., The Insurance Code of the Philippine Annotated, 2010 Edition p.71
18
Perez, The Insurance Code and Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010, 6 th ed. 2014, p. 324
19
De Leon, De Leon Jr., The Insurance Code of the Philippine Annotated, 2010 Edition p.71
20
Insurance Code Sec. 7, RA 10607
A Public Enemy is a nation at war with the Philippines and also every citizen or
subject of such nation. Such term does not include robbers, thieves and riotous
mobs.21
When property is insured any condition upon which the insurer wish to
21
Black’s Law Dictionary, citing State v. Moore, 74 Mo. 417, 41 Am. Rep. 322. Asked VIII(a), 2000 Bar Exams.
22
Filipinas Cia de Seguros vs. Christern Huenfeld & Co., 89 Phil.54 [1951]; S. Winshop vs. Phil. Trust Co., Phil. 744
[1952]
rely, in order to avoid liability encase of a loss, must be expressed in the
policy.
c. Insurable interest
“SEC. 10. Every person has an insurable interest in the life and health:
“(a) Of himself, of his spouse and of his children;
“(b) Of any person on whom he depends wholly or in part for education or support, or in whom
he has a pecuniary interest;
“(c) Of any person under a legal obligation to him for the payment of money, or respecting
property or services, of which death or illness might delay or prevent the performance; and
“(d) Of any person upon whose life any estate or interest vested in him depends.23
Filipinas Cia. De Seguros vs. Christian Huenfeld & Co., Inc., G.R. No. L-2294,
May 25, 1951
When the cause of loss happened when the insured is prohibited from being
insured, such as when he became a public enemy, the insured is not entitled to
indemnity.
23
Insurance Code RA10607, Title 3, Sec. 10
24
Perez, The Insurance Code and Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010, 6 th ed. 2014, p.43, citing
Sandlin’s Adm’x v. Allen, 90 S.W. 350, 262 Ky. 355. ,
25
Perez, The Insurance Code and Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010, 6 th ed. 2014, p.43, citing
Casper’s Amd’r v. Lobus’ Admr’s 90 S.W. 2d 33, 262 Ky 245.
of the insured. Insurable Interest in life however, must be one in favor of the
continuance of life and not an interest in its loss or destruction.26
The test of insurable interest in property is whether the insured has such a right,
title or interest therein, or relation thereto that he will be benefited y its
preservation and continued existence, or suffer a direct pecuniary loss from its
destruction or injury by the peril insured against.28
26
Perez, The Insurance Code and Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010, 6th ed. 2014, p.44, citing 44
C.J.S. 903; Warnock vs. Davis, 104 US 775; Couch 2d. 226.
27
Insurance Code, Sec. 13 RA10607
28
Formerly Section 80 of the Insurance Act, Perez, The Insurance Code and Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency
Act of 2010, 6th ed. 2014, p.56
Garcia vs. Hongkong Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 45:122
Garcia wanted insurance upon a stock of goods, which he owned, and
he received and paid for a policy on a building, which he did not own,
and while the policy was in force and effect, both the building, which he
did not own, and the stock of merchandise, which he did own, were
completely destroyed by fire. Under the pleadings and proof, there is
ground for the contention that the plaintiff would be entitled to recover
on the policy for the loss of the building.