Sampling and Data Collection: Lecture 19-20 Research Methods (Business) Isp-Aht
Sampling and Data Collection: Lecture 19-20 Research Methods (Business) Isp-Aht
Sampling and Data Collection: Lecture 19-20 Research Methods (Business) Isp-Aht
Table of Contents
What is sampling?...........................................................................................................................................................1
Types of Sampling:..........................................................................................................................................................2
1-Random/Probability Sampling..................................................................................................................................2
Simple Random Sample...........................................................................................................................................2
Systematic Random Sample.....................................................................................................................................3
Stratified Random Sample.......................................................................................................................................3
Cluster Sampling......................................................................................................................................................3
2- Non-Probability Sampling:......................................................................................................................................4
Convenience Sampling............................................................................................................................................4
Judgmental/Purposive Sampling..............................................................................................................................4
Quota Sampling........................................................................................................................................................4
Snowball Sampling..................................................................................................................................................5
Sequential Sampling................................................................................................................................................5
Theoretical Sampling...............................................................................................................................................5
1-Random/Probability Sampling
Probability sampling: all elements in the population have some known, non-zero chance or
probability of being selected as sample subjects.
Probability samples that rely on random processes require more work than nonrandom ones. A
researcher must identify specific sampling elements (e.g. persons) to include in the sample. For
example, if conducting a telephone survey, the researcher needs to try to reach the specific
sampled person, by calling back several times, to get an accurate sample.
Cluster Sampling
The target papulation is first divided into mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive
subpopulations, or clusters. Then a random sample of cluster is selected, based on a probability
sampling technique.
The purpose of cluster sampling is to sample economically while retaining the characteristics of a
probability sample. Groups or chunks of elements that, ideally, would have heterogeneity among
the members within each group are chosen for study in cluster sampling. This is in contrast to
choosing some elements from the population as in simple random sampling, or stratifying and
then choosing members from the strata, or choosing every nth case in the population in systematic
sampling. When several groups with intra-group heterogeneity and inter-group homogeneity are
found, then a random sampling of the clusters or groups can ideally be done and information
gathered from each of the members in the randomly chosen clusters.
Cluster samples offer more heterogeneity within groups and more homogeneity among and
homogeneity within each group and heterogeneity across groups.
A researcher draws several samples in stages in cluster sampling. In a three-stage sample, stage 1
is random sampling of big clusters; stage 2 is random sampling of small clusters within each
selected big cluster; and the last stage is sampling of elements from within the sampled within the
sampled small clusters. First, one randomly samples the city blocks, then households within
blocks, then individuals within households. This can also be an example of multistage area
sampling.
2- Non-Probability Sampling:
Non-probability sampling: the elements do not have known or predetermined chance of being
selected as subjects.
In non-probability sampling designs, the elements in the population do not have any probabilities
attached to their being chosen as sample subjects. This means that the findings from the study of
the sample cannot be confidently generalized to the population. However the researchers may at
times be less concerned about generalizability than obtaining some preliminary information in a
quick and inexpensive way. Sometimes non-probability could be the only way to collect the data.
Convenience Sampling
Convenience sampling (also called haphazard or accidental sampling) refers to sampling by
obtaining units or people who are most conveniently available. For example, it may be convenient
and economical to sample employees in companies in a nearby area, sample from a pool of
friends and neighbors. The person-on-the street interview conducted by TV programs is another
example. TV interviewers go on the street with camera and microphone to talk to few people who
are convenient to interview. The people walking past a TV studio in the middle of the day do not
represent everyone (homemakers, people in the rural areas). Likewise, TV interviewers select
people who look “normal” to them and avoid people who are unattractive, poor, very old, or
inarticulate.
Convenience samples are least reliable but normally the cheapest and easiest to conduct.
Convenience sampling is most often used during the exploratory phase of a research project and is
perhaps the best way of getting some basic information quickly and efficiently. Often such sample
is taken to test ideas or even to gain ideas about a subject of interest.
Judgmental/Purposive Sampling
Depending upon the type of topic, the researcher lays down the criteria for the subjects to be
included in the sample on the basis of own judgment for special purpose. Whoever meets that
criteria could be selected in the sample? The researcher might select such cases or might provide
the criteria to somebody else and leave it to his/her judgment for the actual selection of the
subjects. That is why such a sample is also called as judgmental or expert opinion sample. For
example a researcher is interested in studying students who are enrolled in a course on research
methods, are highly regular, are frequent participants in the class discussions, and often come with
new ideas. The criteria has been laid down, the researcher may do this job himself/herself, or may
ask the teacher of this class to select the students by using the said criteria. In the latter situation
we are leaving it to the judgment of the teacher to select the subjects. Similarly we can give some
criteria to the fieldworkers and leave it to their judgment to select the subjects accordingly. In a
study of working women the researcher may lay down the criteria like: the lady is married, has
two children, one of her child is school going age, and is living in nuclear family.
Quota Sampling
A sampling procedure that ensures that certain characteristics of a population sample will be
represented to the exact extent that the researcher desires. In this case the researcher first
identifies relevant categories of people (e.g. male and female; or under age 30, ages 30 to 60, over
60, etc.) then decides how many to get in each category. Thus the number of people in various
categories of sample is fixed. For example the researcher decides to select 5 males and 5 females
under age 30, 10 males and 10 females aged 30 to 60, and 5 males and 5 females over age 60 for a
40 person sample. This is quota sampling.
Once the quota has been fixed then the researcher may use convenience sampling. The
convenience sampling may introduce bias. For example, the field worker might select the
individual according to his/her liking, who can easily be contacted, willing to be interviewed, and
belong to middle class. Quota sampling can be considered as a form of proportionate stratified
sampling, in which a predetermined proportion of people are sampled from different groups, but
on a convenience basis.
Snowball Sampling
Snowball sampling (also called network, chain referral, or reputational sampling) is a method for
identifying and sampling (or selecting) cases in the network. It is based on an analogy to a
snowball, which begins small but becomes larger as it is rolled on wet snow and picks up
additional snow. It begins with one or a few people or cases and spreads out on the basis of links
to the initial cases.
This design has been found quite useful where respondents are difficult to identify and are best
located through referral networks. In the initial stage of snowball sampling, individuals are
discovered and may or may not be selected through probability methods. This group is then used
to locate others who possess similar characteristics and who, in turn, identify others. The
“snowball” gather subjects as it rolls along.
For example, a researcher examines friendship networks among teenagers in a community. He or
she begins with three teenagers who do not know each other. Each teen names four close friends.
The researcher then goes to the four friends and asks each to name four close friends, then goes to
those four and does the same thing again, and so forth. Before long, a large number of people are
involved. Each person in the sample is directly or indirectly tied to the original teenagers, and
several people may have named the same person. The researcher eventually stops, either because
no new names are given, indicating a closed network, or because the network is so large that it is
at the limit of what he or she can study.
Sequential Sampling
Sequential sampling is similar to purposive sampling with one difference. In purposive sampling,
the researcher tries to find as many relevant cases as possible, until time, financial resources, or
his or her energy is exhausted. The principle is to get every possible case. In sequential sampling,
a researcher continues to gather cases until the amount of new information or diversity is filled.
The principle is to gather cases until a saturation point is reached. In economic terms, information
is gathered, or the incremental benefit for additional cases, levels off or drops significantly. It
requires that the researcher continuously evaluates all the collected cases. For example, a
researcher locates and plans in-depth interviews with 60 widows over 70 years old who have been
living without a spouse for 10 or more years. Depending on the researcher’s purposes, getting an
additional 20 widows whose life experiences, social background, and worldview differ little from
the first 60 may be unnecessary.
Theoretical Sampling
In theoretical sampling, what the researcher is sampling (e.g. people, situation, events, time
periods, etc.) is carefully selected, as the researcher develops grounded theory. A growing
theoretical interest guides the selection of sample cases. The researcher selects cases based on
new insights they may provide. For example, a field researcher may be observing a site and a
group of people during week days. Theoretically, the researcher may question whether the people
act the same at other times or when other aspects of site change. He or she could then sample
other time periods (e.g. nights and weekends) to get more full picture and learn whether important
conditions are the same.
Degree of Accuracy
Selecting a representative sample is, of course, important to all researchers. However, the error
may vary from project to project, especially when cost saving or another benefit may be a trade-
off for reduction in accuracy.
Resources
The costs associated with the different sampling techniques vary tremendously. If the researcher’s
financial and human resources are restricted, this limitation of resources will eliminate certain
methods. For a graduate student working on a master’s thesis, conducting a national survey is
almost always out of the question because of limited resources. Managers usually weigh the cost
of research versus the value of information often will opt to save money by using non-probability
sampling design rather than make the decision to conduct no research at all.